In the beginning you interjected meta-ethics into a video that's supposed to be about normative ethics. Virtue ethics is a normative ethical position and is not tied to any one meta-ethical position. You can be a moral realist and be a virtue ethicist, it doesn't necessitate moral relativism. You could also be a deontologist and a moral relativist, in that each individual/culture simply has rules for themselves and are true for them but not true universally/absolutely.
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
Thank you for this lesson! this will surely help me in my upcoming midterm exam in ethics.
great video!
thank you
For the lesson.
In the beginning you interjected meta-ethics into a video that's supposed to be about normative ethics. Virtue ethics is a normative ethical position and is not tied to any one meta-ethical position. You can be a moral realist and be a virtue ethicist, it doesn't necessitate moral relativism. You could also be a deontologist and a moral relativist, in that each individual/culture simply has rules for themselves and are true for them but not true universally/absolutely.
Moral relativism, oh God.