9:42 Do you think it's probably accidental? I've generally assumed that every time they go aggressively on the offensive, they're using the "warfare via demoralization" strategy.
In this case, I believe it was more intentional than otherwise. However, it comes with a warning against ascribing intent too liberally. People can inflict moral injury without doing so intentionally. As we zoom out, I believe there is a broad mix of both intentional participants who wield moral injury like a cudgel, and there are others who, through carelessness, indifference, or otherwise, contribute to the suffering of others. It's not simply "the evil leaders and the stupid populace" approach that so many conservatives default to, but rather, a matter of justice. We differentiate murder from manslaughter via intent. Murder requires intent and is adjudicated more severely. Not merely blamed.
9:42 Do you think it's probably accidental? I've generally assumed that every time they go aggressively on the offensive, they're using the "warfare via demoralization" strategy.
In this case, I believe it was more intentional than otherwise. However, it comes with a warning against ascribing intent too liberally. People can inflict moral injury without doing so intentionally. As we zoom out, I believe there is a broad mix of both intentional participants who wield moral injury like a cudgel, and there are others who, through carelessness, indifference, or otherwise, contribute to the suffering of others.
It's not simply "the evil leaders and the stupid populace" approach that so many conservatives default to, but rather, a matter of justice. We differentiate murder from manslaughter via intent. Murder requires intent and is adjudicated more severely. Not merely blamed.
Ok that's serious😅
Now we're talkin
Yes@@redactedllc