Play Epic War: Thrones and enjoy the real war game experience! - Download here: bitly.ws/j84U Use the code WAR777 to redeem in-game exclusive prizes! Epic War: Thrones - Real War, Real Epic! Episode #1 Battle of Narva 1700: th-cam.com/video/1DvbGhQcCJw/w-d-xo.html Episode #2 Battle of Kliszow 1702: th-cam.com/video/M6zvXZG-jCM/w-d-xo.html
Sir made vedio on Anglo-mysore war.( india).. These war impact the American war of independence...on British French soldiers.. Invent the world first iron cased rockets..
Congratulations! Your videos are like fruit sallad. Every each video has it's own taste and nature that satisfies a certain nerve of my body. You should be sponsored by the governments of all countries in the world. I visited many of European cities just because of your history channel. Best luck and most successful wishes to you guys. Just don't get biased and keep going as trusted as you are now. ❤️
You'd not question the name, would you read about the amount of balls the 450 Swedes displayed when defending the place in 1702, against 12,000+ Russians.
It’s eerie how much Charles’s career reflects Napoleon. Outnumbered and outgunned by huge coalitions, yet consistently winning battles until he decides to invade Russian territory.
After the battle, the Saxon commander wrote a touching letter to Eugene of Savoy, in which he said: "It does not look naturally possible, that an army posted as this [the allies] was, can be put into any unheard of disorder in just a quarter of an hour ... the order and bravery of their troops [the Swedes] in advancing to attack us, notwithstanding the terrible fire we made upon them, cannot be enough praised and advanced; and if it be a good fortune to command troops like these, who are always sure of victory, what must be the chagrin and misfortune of those who have to deal with them?"
See the Caroleans standing tall, All for one and one for all, Enemies fall at their feet, Begging for their mercy. See the Caroleans standing tall, Conquer lands and slaughter all, Enemies fall at their feet, Victory and great defeat.
@@solomon4554 Gjuterblod, moter doden vid Fraustadt. Synderflod, genom fiendens led. Gjuterblod, ingen nad kommer givas, dar. My keyboard doesn't speak Swedish vowels sorry XD.
Probably because he lost it all in the end. But it's insane that it would even come to Poltava if you see what happened here. Haha I did not knew it was such a troublesome situation right from the start.
Swedes, who were not known for the strength of their cavalry, managed to beat the Poles and Saxons while being outnumbered 5 to 1. Impressive, most impressive.
Gustav II Adolf had the infamous hakkapeliitta cavalry, that also served as his personal guard. They had such rugged appearances, rumors spread that they dibbled in witchcraft.
At the time Polish cavalry was a mere shadow of its former self. In times of Gustav Adolf, not even his own personal guard could withstand a fight with Polish hussars. By the time of Charles XII, Polish "army" was but a glorified militia.
@@kamilszadkowski8864 The hakkapeliitta where light cavalry compared to the more heavy polish hussars. It would be a gross misconduct to ever have them fight one on one.
There is one small nitpick I have. It should be nice to see Łódź, my city on your beautiful map, but in this period it's a bit of an inaccuracy. Prior to the Industrial Revolution, Łódź was just a very small rural town. Other towns in the region, like Łęczyca, Sieradz or Piotrków Trybunalski, were bigger and more important.
@@joellaz9836 Anyone who thinks . . . "there is within us a moral instinct which forbids us to rejoice at the death of even an enemy" . . . has obviously never read the Torah and Tannakh. Please cry some more so I can paste quotes from your so-called "holy book" which rejoices over your bronze age genocidal racial supremacy.
There's a reason some Polish poets have spoken of their nation as a Christ-like entity, suffering for the sins of Europe. A bit far-fetched, perhaps, but like all good legends it has a grin of truth
Will be frank here, the polish-lithuanian army was actually quite competent for an european major power at the time considering the disastrous Deluge half a century before. Their main problem was their officer corp, who was mostly made up of weak noblemen politicians, with little to no readiness for a war against the innovative swedish military doctrine and officer corp. Plus the political disagreements between the noble Szclachta and king Augustus II made the loyalty of the military toward the latter's cause very difficult.
but he did know how to use battles. He also knew that unless the enemy kings were deposed or surrendered under his terms that they'd be back later having prepared against swedish superiority. Tho seemingly stupid that he rejected countless peace deals, he knew precisely what he was doing
@@hashtagrex did he? He spent years fighting a thoroughly defeated enemy for personal reasons, ignoring potentially lucrative diplomatic opportunities at the expense of Sweden's position. He may have known his own justifications (none of which were wise) for why he was doing what he was doing, but he catastrophically misjudged the situation. Your comments regarding kings are also very inaccurate for the example of Augustus, who had already shown that his personal authority and position was quite weak, and that he conspicuously lacked strong support within the nobility of the Commonwealth.
@@basilharpham9372 I never said it wasn't necessarily an inaccurate line - ancient adages often are. I personally agree marching on Rome was probably futile, but that is something we will never know the truth of. However, in the context of Charles, and his incompentence in diplomacy and statecraft, who got repeatedly generous offers of peace from all of his enemies (which Hannibal never received) it is completely accurate.
@@TheSamuraijim87 and yet Augustus was unwilling to give up the title of King, nor surrender under Charles' terms. He may not have been a remarkable individual, but any opportunity given to Augustus to reinforce his position for the future was a risk Sweden couldn't take. You also seem to be ignoring that Charles *very* quickly made peace with Denmark when it was under terms he wanted. He wasn't stupid enough to believe that his enemies wouldn't try again in greater force if he left them any opportunity to stabilise and improve their armies. Are you also gonna ignore how simple Charles' terms were? All he really wanted from the war was Augustus deposed. Thats not about being personal, its about the fact that he was fighting a defensive war, which you clearly don't understand means you're perceived weak. A show of force and victory is not enough to permanently secure your position in a defensive war. Let's say he gives in and lets both Peter and Augustus offer their peace, with trivial gains for Sweden, maybe a few territories. What happens after? The commonwealth and Russia fix the glaring issues that they exposed with their overconfident war and come back to fight Sweden much much stronger. Sweden has now lost all advantage in the future war because it didn't use it to its fullest during this one, and its armies superiority now means nothing because its numerically much smaller against improved, competent Russian and Commonwealth armies who had years to prepare to fight Sweden again. What if they bring in more allies, like they did after Poltava? What if they pass military reforms after seeing the Swedish in action and come back with the exact same tactics but with larger forces? What if they go on different military campaigns and gain thousands of elite soldiers with new tactics? It's ridiculously uninformed to say Charles was just a petty, stupid king wanting revenge. Sweden's position was one surrounded on all sides by enemies. He didn't refuse peace "at the expense" of Sweden's position. He ensured that Sweden's position changed
The battle that confirmed the fear that Charles XII's army meant business. At Narva everyone was just "Oh this was a fluke" and counted him lucky at Kliszow, now Charles XII's eyes are glowing red with malicious intent looking for Augustus II.
his powerful voice is perfect to explain all the events what happened in history. that channel gives me lessons in history, even better than school or university. thank you a lot , Kings and Generals. i expect more history from you in the future.
Devin's voice truly shines when he's narrating how barbarians of Civ VI utilised time-travelling technologies and fielded Medieval infantry against his hoplites.
See the Caroleans standing tall, all for one and one for all. Enemies fall at their feet, begging for their mercy. See the Caroleans standing tall, conquer land slaughter all. Enemies fall at their feet; victory and great defeat.
Haha I love how Epic History TV's music choices have started to spread more throughout other history channels. Although the actual composer's (Ben Hayden) tracks can be found on Filmstro.
@Persian Reich Well actually the Swedish Invasion(Deluge) in 1650 was as most destructive as shit that happened in WW2. During Deluge it was first time that capitals of Poland and Lithuania were taken by enemy force(during Mongol invasions there was no Kingdom of Poland but only several dukes)
I feel we will see battle of Poltava soon. A dark day in Swedish history. Who knows what would have happened if not defeat at Poltava.. But still, what a small and poore nation as Sweden was has achieved, is just amazing and deserve our admiration!
For those who didn't get it, the Russian soldiers turned their uniforms inside out because the change in color would then make them resemble Saxon soldiers to a certain degree, hoping they would not be recognized as inexperienced troops.
"Schulenburg believed that the mere presence of his superior army would be enough to rout the Swedish force." Yes, because all empirical knowledge was so clear that Swedes reacted that way to being outnumbered. They never did learn did they!
that was not the problem, carolus rex got drunk of his victories and should have just went back to narva region once he defeated the polish to defend his homeland instead of going into the ottoman empire and then suffered a massive defeat at poltava
@@smiIingman Fair point, but the whole point of them becoming who they were was precisely because they couldn't compete on the demographic and economic level. In this case, necessity forced them to innovate whereas had they had the same advantages as Russia, would they have innovated to do what they did?
@@Handles-Suck-TH-cam oops, my mistake. I will not redact it as to let your comment make sense when someone else is reading it. But, yeah, you are totally right
@@michaelsinger4638 And Hitler were aware of Napoleon's demise in Russia - but thought he could defeat Russia/Soviet in two months time after crushing France in one month.
@@mrnygren2 History doesn't repeat, but it rhymes. Each was justified in thinking that way. Just because it happened before, doesn't mean it'll happen again. But there's a good chance that it will. Both took that chance. As a Muslim, I'm no expert in European history, but I think they both had no other way if they'd hoped to at least maintain the status quo of them being at the top of Europe. You just can't do that with Russia still standing! Just look at today! After the cold war ended...after everything that has happened, the shadow of Russian dominance over Europe started looming again! Europe's best hope is for someone to stab Russia in the back, as in, dismantle it from the east or south into smaller states. Maybe China...Turkey or some new power in middle Asia. All of those seem extremely far fetched at the moment. China is extremely huge already, and they have no important quarrels with Russia. I am curious of what Turkey and Afganistan will look like in 50 years tho. Turkey's been on the rise for a good 2 decades, and Taliban are doing something completely new to the world order in Afghanistan. Maybe they'll shake things up if they manage to stay in power longer this time. As for the USA, depends if a new world war breaks out or not. If not, Russia is fine. If it does, we need to first see who's involved. I don't think Russia would side with China if a world war breaks out, neither would China side with Russia. They'd both benefit of the other two weakening each other! Last thing that may end Russia is total economic collapse, which I don't think is as far fetched as it seems. A huge economic crisis is about to hit the world God knowing. Everyone knows that, we just don't know when. Russia and China have both been trying to become economically independent, but I don't think they've been succeeding. Depends on how firmly under the boot they can keep both their populations. I ranted again didn't I!
Thank you for this channel. I am what you call an "amateur historian" with most of my reading and focus on wars of the 20th century. Your channel offers me an education on a variety of conflicts fought in the previous centuries. Thanks again for the history lesson!
Except for butchering the name of Rehnskiöld 😂(which more or less means ”reindeer-shield” in old swedish), and some of the other regional names, this was an absolutely fantastic episode! So fun to learn more about my countrys history. I obviously understand you can’t manage to do everything but me adding a request for the future won’t do any harm I hope. My request for future ep is one about Gustav III. He is greatly known for his huge influence on swedish culture. The capital of the island of St Barthelemy + its airport for example are both named after him. So an ep about him and the wars he fought in, although they were few, would be great to see! Thank you so much and well done!
There'd probably be no Swedish involvement in it or they'd use it as a backdrop for a series about some court woman or whatever. I am not kidding when I say that most of the upper echelon of Sweden (those in the Arts community) and politicians look upon "the era of great power" as something shameful
@@Pottan23 It depends on how you sell it, the elites are snobs in a bubble whit no real convictions. Make the movie the tragedy its supposed to be. War is hell and this war was no exception. It ends Whit a desperate attack against the Russians outside of Stockholm after all. Not really a happy lucky glory ending, more like a national doomsday ending were all the men have died and the country is destroyed for two generations, you tell the true story about the war call it provocative and they'll produce it.
I kept thinking back to my wonderful tour of the Prague Castle with a hilarious Canadian tour guide and his melodramatic references to the existential threat of THE SWEEEEEEDES
Big balls indeed but it also helped that they had a very strong religious belief that their cause was just and dying for it was a sure way to paradise.
Musketeers back then did 2 rounds per minute on a good day, and cannon did less depending on their calibre. A brisk walk followed by mass fire when you saw the whites of their eyes ensures you only encounter 1 effective volley at most before they break from the shock value of your charge
@Alenas Kvasninas Why are Russian trolls like you so obsessed with Poland taking a miniature region in 1938? They seem to forget Warsaw did this in agreement with Prague, not Berlin.
@@goscodfilmow "They seem to forget Warsaw did this in agreement with Prague, not Berlin." The words of a true imbecile. Prague had no choice and was not even invited to the meetings. Our president had to wait for the decision behind closed doors while our allies conspired with Nazi monsters to betray us.
Great video! I think the big mistake of the Sweden King was letting Russia having a open door to the Baltic Sea while he was focusing against Augustus II
The Swedish commander brought about a very impressive victory for his king. And probably helped pave the way for victory for his country. My compliments to all those who made this video a reality.
Obligatory Sabaton reference: One by one the Saxons disband Or die where they stand Killing ground Even though you surrender Turn around You will never survive Killing ground As the battle of Fraustadt turns
En för en, flyr Sachsens män hem Död väntar dem Gjuter blod Möter döden vid Fraustadt Syndaflod Genom fiendens led Gjuter blod Ingen nåd kommer givas, där
What a battle,such tactical brilliance has been hidden in a neglected time period which held great importance,I have never heard about this war except from the Ottoman-Russo war that came shortly after,and then the previous video you made about Charles XII residence at Bender.
"Tactical brilliance ?" Bruh, he just told his army to march straight forward over an open field into fortified positions. This has all the tactical brilliance of charging a trench head on. The reason this worked comes entirely down to the quality of the swedish soldiers, and the lack thereof on the Saxon's side.
@@ravenknight4876 it was tactical brilliance though lol? He managed to fool the Saxon commander, which was part of his plan. Rehnskiöld then chose a perfect location for his army to be able to fight the much larger saxon force, the ”Gå på” swedish infantry strategy was all part of the tactics + the flanking cavalry. You need a tactical mind to be able to achieve this
Immediately upon receiving news of the victory, Karl XII wrote to Carl-Gustaf Rehnskiöld: “Det syntes Mig väl vara, det som Herr Generalen beslutit. Såväl om fångarna som om Posen”.
Agreed. It's disappointing sometimes that rare series such as the Great Northern War are being released slowly while Alexander the Great's series, which have been covered a lot by other channels, are being released quite quickly.
That makes sense. But, unlike other channels, this channel already has millions of followers, so there is no need to cover a part of history that's already been covered by others. I'd rather see this channel focuses on covering wars or campaigns that haven't been covered by other channels, such as this one. Or maybe other wars and campaigns before the lifetime of Alexander the Great such as the Achaemenid Empire conquest of Egypt, Greco-Persian Wars, and Corinthian War.
@@hananreldy4395 I mean, it takes quite some time to make each episode; this is especially true for the Great Northern War, since the war has not been explored to detail in a similar fashion (apart from that Extra Credits or whatever).
@@Leaffordes Right. The thing is that I wish this channel doesn't do too many series at the same time. I mean, it's fine if they do only 2-4 series at the same time, but not more than that. I still remember that it took more than a year to finish the Thirty Years War series. I believe that they could have done it in three months if they focused on finishing that series first before moving on to another series. I hope that I don't offend anyone by saying this.
@@vinterskugga That's right. I still remember that in the end of the last video of the Thirty Year's War series they said that they would cover wars that took place after that such as the War of Devolution and the War of the League of Augsburg. I really wish that they would cover these wars first before doing other wars and campaigns that aren't related to the Thirty Year's War.
Saxons: The enemy army is retreating. Let's pursue them and wipe them all out! Saxons: Ok, the enemy army is ready for battle. No worry. Our army is bigger. Let's defeat them! Saxons: Ok, looks like they are attacking us. No worry. Just stand and fight and we will win this easily. They don't even shoot at us! Saxons:
"Differing slightly, the accounts agree that Patkul, after a prolonged process of breaking his bones with the wheel, begged for his decapitation (crying "Kopf ab!") and rolled to the block on his own; the following decapitation did however not succeed until after several strikes."
The swedish empire was incredible in the 17th and early 18th century ,I think there should be a video on the swedish army in the swedish empire period.
Great episode and nice pronunciation of Leszczyński! Fun fact: there is a phrase in Polish: _od Sasa do Lasa_ (from 'Sas' to 'Las') meaning something chaotic. It originated in that period, referencing the civil war between the supporters of Augustus and Leszczyński.
In Norwegian, and a lot of other languages, a phrase describing something chaotic is "Polsk riksdag". Meaning "Polish Parliament", referencing the diet during the Commonwealth era.
@@Artur_M. Most extreme case I know was in the Polish-Swedish war of 1600-1611 where the Poles won an overwhelming victory at Kircholm, but failed to capitalise, and even conceded afterwards, because the Sejm refused to raise forces to help or even grant funds to pay the already raised army of Chodkiewicz.
@@GardEngebretsen the real tragic part is that in the late 16th century, parts of Europe used "polish accord" as a way of expressing one's belief in getting along. Because the sejm (Senate) would actually work. By the end of the 17th century, the same meaning had become an insult at people who can't come to an accord. Fascinating how the commonwealth can teach so many lessons to us if only we care to look.
I'll never look at a Swedish cookbook the same again: "Add generous amounts of salt to this dish, the same way Charles would apply it to the wounded Augustus having to congratulate Stanislaw. Mmmmm!!!"
It's funny that no one mention the dude was the military mind behind Narva and Klizow as well. Charles certainly was talented and bold but he also was smart enough to let his fathers veteran generals run things, in the beginning at least.
The "lobster-tailed pot helmet" was an extremely popular form of head protection throughout the the 17th century, especially with cavalrymen. "Hummerhielm" was probably not his real name, but rather an honorific or nickname that he earned for being an exceptional cavalry commander if I had to guess
@@stevensonbak True about the existence of such a helmet, but 'Hummerhielm' was not a nickname, it was indeed his real surname once he was ennobled (previously, it was just 'Hummer').
I don't think his army improved much throughout the war. But I can give Peter some credit for some tactically smart things he would do. Like the T-shaped line of redoubts at Poltava that caused devestating losses for the Swedish army. That formation was brilliant in the sense that it created the oppurtunity for flanking fire. And if you attack a redoubt with a line formation with a company, then can you theoretically kill 250 men with just one lucky cannon ball shot from the side. So the flanking fire was deadly. Peters handling of his invasion of Finland was also smart. Finland was a country too poor to feed a large Russian invasion army no matter how brutaly it would plunder the Finnish population. So food supplies had therefore to come from Russia. And the only way to get them to Finland was by sea since the road network in Finland was non-existent. The problem was that the Swedish navy was superior so transporting food by sea would not work. But Peter then changed his plans, and attacked Finland during the months while the Swedish navy was stuck in Stockholm and had to wait until the ice had melted before it could set sail to Finland. But then would the first phase of the Russian invasion already have been acomplished. Peter also reintroduced the galley into warfare in the Baltic sea. And it proved to be excellent in the shallow waters along the Finnish coast and the waters near Stockholm. The Swedish deep water navy was superior but could not follow the galleys into the shallow waters and destroy them.
@@Theodre_Verany The battle was lost due to incompetence of the Swedish cavalry generals Hamilton and Creutz who squandered the Swedish battle plan of a surprise attack on the redoubts with their long delay. Many of the redoubts were conquered and passed and the attacking Russian cavalry was beaten back. So even with this disasterous start there was still hope for a win that day. Then it was time for the next idiot to enter this story: Roos who commanded a large chunk of the Swedish infantry. After his troops had conquered the 2nd redoubt a silence had suddenly fallen on the battlefield. Roos and his 4 battallions were suddenly standing alone at the redoubts and the Swedish army had moved on. And Roos had no idea where to go to link up with the main force. The idiot then decided to attack a redoubt alone just for fun and got half of the men in the (inofficially) elite regiment from Dalarna killed and all its officers dead. The attempt to take it was aborted. And he began a retreat and looked for the rest of the army. The Russians saw this lone force and understood what had happened and sent out a strong force to destroy it - which they did. And the Swedish army realized that it had suffered losses during the morning. And they prefered to wait hours for Roos to reinforce the army, but he never came. So the surprise attack of the Russian camp never happened. The commander of the highest responsability of the battle: Rehnskiöld had acted as an arrogant idiot the entire day. He had been rude towards Lewenhaupt and others, and he had not bothered to inform other officers about the battle plan before the battle - which caused much confusion, and idiots like Roos did therefore not know where to go with his forces. When some scouts had spotted the main army moving out from the Russian camp to go into battle, he did refuse to believe the news. He was too arrogant and assumed that the Russian army would remain passive and always avoid battle - like it always had done the last 2 years. This arrogant underestimation of Russia, did delay a Swedish response. And when he finally took his horse to see for himself the Russian troop movements, then he finally would react. But then the respons wast hastily and badly planned and organized - like everything else the Swedish army did this day. He lined up his infantry - 4000 men, to attack a Russian force of 28.000. The Swedish cavalry was supposed to help the infantry. But because of thick forrests on the sides of the battle lines was it impossible to line up the cavalry, so it had to walk behind the infantry and being unable to support it for a long time if fighting would begin. The Swedish infantry attacked the Russian line. The infantry on Swedens left got deleyed, while the Swedish right pushed onwards through a thunderstorm of Russian artillery, and managed to push back the Russian army. The Russian first line was crushed and start fleeing. And in earlier battles would this be a sign that victory was near. A numerical advantage quickly turns into a disadvantage as panic and stampede enters the mix. But as the Swedes push forward and gained ground on Russias expense, did the left side finally come into contact with the Russian troops a bit later, and they were quickly pushed back as Russia had their best regiments on the right side of the Russian line. It was now or never. Soon the line would break for either side. The Swedish cavalry could come in on the left and stabalize the front line while the infantry on the right would roll up the Russian line and win this battle. But that would never happen. The Swedish cavalry was sitting on their asses near the forrest and had not yet even formed up for battle as their friends in the infantry got murdered by the Russian over-might. Finally did a few squadrons get ready and moved towards the left. But then it was already too late. The cowards in Närke-Värmlands regiment and Östergötland had begun to flee and desert. and the Swedish line fell apart like a house of cards. And the Swedish cavalry squadrons arrived, but it was too little too late and they were soon cut to pieces. The Russian infantry and cavalry on the Swedish left moved on and encircled and massacred nearly all of Upplands regiment. And then they moved on and destroyed one regiment after another on the Swedish left. And soon there was nothing left of the Swedish infantry. And sure, the Russian military victory was total. 50,000 people were lost at Poltava and Perevolotjna. And the Russians captured lots of guns, musical instruments, flags, silver, Swedish plunder from other military campaigns in the Baltics, Poland and Germany, horse saddles, muskets, swords and other things in gigantic amounts. The battle could have ended differently, but many oppurtunities were wasted. What if Rehnskiöld had informed his men about his plan and prepared for battle in good time so the surprise attack would have failed? Rehnskiöld believed that a fast surprise attack would have made it possible to storm the forts easily without much bloodshed. So to not delay the army he did not carry any big cannons with him. And no ladders to climb on had been prepared. No fascines had been prepared to climb over ditches and moats. No hand grenades were distributed for storming a castle - none of the usual equipment and preparations for attacking a fortified position had been done. So no wonder that it ended up in a bloodshed. And when the Russian redoubts started to fire, then the Swedish troops had not lined up and a new battle plan had to be created there and then, under all firing and confusion. And many formations marched to the wrong spot. One can wonder what would have happened if Roos and his men had joined the Swedish army and stormed the Russian camp. What if the Swedish army had brought its many artillery pieces to the battle this day, could that have bended the odds enough in Swedens favor? What would have happened if Närke-Värmlands regiment had hold out for a little longer and the cavalry coming to their rescue? The Swedish cavalry was after all the only thing in which the Swedes had a numerical superiority over the Russians, and yet this was the most badly used resource of the Swedish army this day. Roos, Creutz, Rehnskiöld and Hamilton lost this battle, along with the cowards in Närke-Värmlands infantry regiment.
@@Theodre_Verany *"What you fail to take into account is the fact that those positions that the Swedes were trying to break through were held by the Russian front line units only."* The redoubts were to some extent taken. There was however many ways this problem could have been dealt with in better ways. 1. A succesful surprise attack with cavalry. 2. Stormning them with artillery, faschines, hand grenades, ladders, poles with ropes for climbing and so on.. 3. Avoid the redoubt line, and instead move the army to the western side of the Russian camp and then attack it. Thereby could the fighting in the redoubts be avoided all togheter. *"They still had loads of reserves to plug holes in the lines"* As I said earlier, even when the Russian infantry outnumbered the Swedish 28.000 vs 4000 did the Swedes nearly break the Russian line as in earlier battles where Russia lost to Sweden despite gigantic numerical superiority. War back then was more about psychology than about numbers and weapons technology. *"The fact of the matter is that at no time in the battle were the Russians close to routing"* The infantry attack on the Russian line nearly routed it. Tsar Peter was also fearful about his hopes about winning the battle after the first redoubts had been fallen and a Russian cavalry attack had beaten back... and he probably thought to himself... now its time again for one humiliating defeat despite numerical superiority... its Narva, Düna, Saladen, Jakobstadt, Fraustadt, Holowczyn all over again... But he kept his calm and didn't decide to give up all hopes of a Russian victory yet, and good for him to taking that decision. *"The Swedes on the other hand were suffering horrific casualties the moment they started their advance"* Nowhere did I ever deny that the storming of the redoubts became a costly affair. The commanders had no battle plan. The troops were not yet in formation. They had no artillery - unlike the Russians. And they had no tools prepared to storm the forts. And numerical advantage was more of a problem than an advantage in circumstances like this. The russians did not have to aim to hit something, and so many men flocked around the redoubts that it became impossible to move. Retreating men blocked the way of men moving forward to attack and everything was chaos. Men had no escalades to climb up on the forts so they were easily gun down or cut to pieces once they managed to climb up on the walls. So no surprises here. Swedish solidiers died because they were not prepared. And the Russians had well prepared defensive positions. The high losses was not because the Russian army had become much better than 9 years before. If it was better, then I doubt it would play a defensive game behind a wall like cowards. When it later that day finally came a field battle between the Swedish army and the Russian army. Then had many men already died at the redoubts. And Roos the retard and walked away with a quarter of the Swedish infantry into nowhere. And even despite all this did the Swedish army attack. And Russian cannons fired a hell storm of artillery fire for 9 minutes, before the Swedish army finally made contact with the Russian infantry and deadly fired a volley at close range and charged with swords and bayonets, and the first Russian line began to flee. So no the artillery bombardment later that day did not inflict that much losses. Most losses happened when the line was broken and men started to flee - like in most other battles of the 1700s. So that moment when Närke-Värmlands regiment started to flee was the moment when Russia finally won this battle. From that moment was there nothing the Swedes could do victory from the jaws of defeat. *"Even if my some miracle Sweden won the battle of Poltava that would achieve nothing other than a hollow victory."* Another victory like Narva could have destroyed Russian fighting morale and triggered an uprising and civil war in Russia. Ukrainian Zaporogs and cossacks would feel less hesitation about joining the Swedes. The supply problems in southern Russia would be solved. Fighting morale would be restored. And perhaps would also the Ottomans and Persians feel tempted to join in on the destruction of Russia.
@@Theodre_Verany *"saw his army logistically ruined through the Russian scorched earth tactics"* Ukraine offered much food for the Swedish army and it would not be possible to burn food in all directions. Especially not with Ukrainians on Swedens side and a Russian army on retreat after a lost battle *"The Russian population and army was never going to have a collapse in moral no matter how many battles Charles won"* The collapse of Russia in 1917 illustrates well that Russian patientence is not endless. Russia had fought for 9 years and lost battle after battle. Church bells had been melted to make artillery. Taxes had been raised. Russian losses had been much higher than Swedish ones - including those during the winter and the scorched earth campaigns. And the Tsars westernization program was not popular among all. There existed many reasons for people to rise up against the Tsar. *"The whole reason Charles was heading for the Ukraine was because his attempt on Moscow had already failed"* Partly that, but partly also that he hoped that he could join forces with the Ottomans. *"Russia was gathering strong allies in Europe"* Denmark and Saxony had walked out from the war. Poland had been taken over by a Swedish puppet. And after the humiliating defeat at Narva did Russian diplomats in Europe reporting back home that everyone was laughing at them. Russia had become the laughing stock in Europe, and the diplomats felt bullied and the butt of every joke people made. *"was ravaging Finland"* Nope. Finland fell in 1713. And the main army of Sweden was fighting on the western front. *"raiding the Swedish heartland"* The last years of the war after the King had died, and the country had been taken over by a weak leadership. Even so did the Russian army manage to humiliate itself at the battle of Stäket and managed to lose against an enemy it outnumbered 3 to 1. So I still not believe that the Russian army improved much throughout the war. *"had beaten the Swedish fleet as sea"* Nope. The Swedish high sea fleet still dominated the Baltic sea. *"he was going to dethrone the Russian leadership rather than negotiate a peace, because that was never going to happen"* The goal was to retake the lands that other countries had stolen. I consider that to be a reasonable moderate minimum demand he made. And none of the men he had to deal with deserved any trust since all had betrayed him before. Peter the Great had promised peace with Sweden barely a year before it started the war. And the cousins August of Saxony and the King of Denmark had betrayed a man of the same blood. So yeah, I would not have any belief in any peace promises from those guys either. If anything he was too kind to them. August should have been dethroned and beheaded. And the defeat at Poltava also showed that neither Denmark and Saxony cared anything about honor, since they happily broke their peace deal as soon they got the chance. *"Charles XII was a capable tactician and a fool of grand strategy"* Charles XII was a capable tactician and a fool of grand strategy. He capable advisors around him as a teenager. And he himself could also produce great battle plans. Like the invasion of Norway. And had he not died and it succeded then would Denmark be knocked out of the war, and Swedish troops could now be shipped to the Baltics to retake this nearly undefended area from the Russians. And without shipments of food from the Baltic ports would the Russian army in Finland either had to retreat or to be starved to death due to lack of food (The food supplies in Finland was inadequate for feeding an army of 30.000 men, so the food therefore had to become from Russia with ships). And thereby would Sweden be able to also retake Finland at a low cost. So he Charles war plan made much sense and is brilliant in my opinion. It would also be extra interesting to see what could have happened if Britain also joined in into the war.
Love the different series. Glad I found your channel and enjoying binge watching. Have you done anything about Bavaria? Trying to find out more about why my family came to the US in the mid 1700's.
The double envelopment here was not like Hannibal in Cannae. It was like Scipio Africanus in Zama. Scipio's method was to collapse the flanks with superior troops and do an encirclement. While Hannibal's method was to lure the enemy into a center circle with his weaker troops and then shut the door on the flanks.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 88 | คู่เอก "ป้อมเพชร vs อัสลามจอน"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1ZqTVVbMgbo/mqdefault.jpg)
![[TH] 2024 PMGC League | Survival Stage วันที่ 1 | PUBG MOBILE Global Championship](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FVFT-PFwU80/mqdefault.jpg)
Play Epic War: Thrones and enjoy the real war game experience! - Download here: bitly.ws/j84U Use the code WAR777 to redeem in-game exclusive prizes! Epic War: Thrones - Real War, Real Epic!
Episode #1 Battle of Narva 1700: th-cam.com/video/1DvbGhQcCJw/w-d-xo.html
Episode #2 Battle of Kliszow 1702: th-cam.com/video/M6zvXZG-jCM/w-d-xo.html
Make a video on Battle of badr 313 only vs 1000
Sir made vedio on Anglo-mysore war.( india).. These war impact the American war of independence...on British French soldiers..
Invent the world first iron cased rockets..
oi šermukšnio **intensified ***
Congratulations!
Your videos are like fruit sallad. Every each video has it's own taste and nature that satisfies a certain nerve of my body.
You should be sponsored by the governments of all countries in the world. I visited many of European cities just because of your history channel.
Best luck and most successful wishes to you guys.
Just don't get biased and keep going as trusted as you are now.
❤️
Code doesn't work
Out of all names the swedes can think of. they chosen "Nut Fortress"
You'd not question the name, would you read about the amount of balls the 450 Swedes displayed when defending the place in 1702, against 12,000+ Russians.
they named the fort in the first day of December
What do you mean? It was a tough nut to crack. lol
Nut Fortress
Swede defenders: Dont come
The only nut no one could bust
It’s eerie how much Charles’s career reflects Napoleon. Outnumbered and outgunned by huge coalitions, yet consistently winning battles until he decides to invade Russian territory.
well you know Napoleon got influenced by Gustavus Adolphus, the father of modern warfare. Hence he was great just like the Swedes!
After the battle, the Saxon commander wrote a touching letter to Eugene of Savoy, in which he said:
"It does not look naturally possible, that an army posted as this [the allies] was, can be put into any unheard of disorder in just a quarter of an hour ... the order and bravery of their troops [the Swedes] in advancing to attack us, notwithstanding the terrible fire we made upon them, cannot be enough praised and advanced; and if it be a good fortune to command troops like these, who are always sure of victory, what must be the chagrin and misfortune of those who have to deal with them?"
I Wonder if Eugene would win or lose a battle against Charles
See the Caroleans standing tall,
All for one and one for all,
Enemies fall at their feet,
Begging for their mercy.
See the Caroleans standing tall,
Conquer lands and slaughter all,
Enemies fall at their feet,
Victory and great defeat.
I mean they did create a
Killing ground
At the battle of Fraustadt
Turn around
You will never survive
I can not believe you cover my absolute favourite battle of this war. This one often goes under the radar.
Have you heard the song based on this battle, Killing Ground by Sabaton?
@@thecombatwombat7652 en för en flyr Sachsens män hem, död väntar dem 😼
@@solomon4554 Gjuterblod, moter doden vid Fraustadt.
Synderflod, genom fiendens led.
Gjuterblod, ingen nad kommer givas, dar.
My keyboard doesn't speak Swedish vowels sorry XD.
Probably because he lost it all in the end. But it's insane that it would even come to Poltava if you see what happened here. Haha I did not knew it was such a troublesome situation right from the start.
Swedes, who were not known for the strength of their cavalry, managed to beat the Poles and Saxons while being outnumbered 5 to 1. Impressive, most impressive.
I would disagree, the Swedish cavalry was ofter the deciding factor in their victories.
Gustav II Adolf had the infamous hakkapeliitta cavalry, that also served as his personal guard.
They had such rugged appearances, rumors spread that they dibbled in witchcraft.
At the time Polish cavalry was a mere shadow of its former self. In times of Gustav Adolf, not even his own personal guard could withstand a fight with Polish hussars. By the time of Charles XII, Polish "army" was but a glorified militia.
El Bandito is referring to the Battle of Warsaw (1705), for anyone wondering.
@@kamilszadkowski8864 The hakkapeliitta where light cavalry compared to the more heavy polish hussars. It would be a gross misconduct to ever have them fight one on one.
There is one small nitpick I have. It should be nice to see Łódź, my city on your beautiful map, but in this period it's a bit of an inaccuracy. Prior to the Industrial Revolution, Łódź was just a very small rural town. Other towns in the region, like Łęczyca, Sieradz or Piotrków Trybunalski, were bigger and more important.
Przykro mi to mówić ale Łódź była wtedy wręcz wiochą
My grandad was from Lodz.
"There is within us a moral instinct which forbids us to rejoice at the death of even an enemy"
- Henryk Sienkiewicz
Henryk obviously never read the Talmud.
that's a cute thought
@@dreamdiction
DA JOOOOOOS. Grow up.
@@joellaz9836 Anyone who thinks . . . "there is within us a moral instinct which forbids us to rejoice at the death of even an enemy" . . . has obviously never read the Torah and Tannakh. Please cry some more so I can paste quotes from your so-called "holy book" which rejoices over your bronze age genocidal racial supremacy.
@@dreamdiction
Oh no. Ancient people were violent. How shocking. Didn’t Romans hold a triumphal celebration for killing a million Gauls?
Kinda feeling sad for Augustus II... I dont know hoe many episodes I have watched but he has been fleeing since the first one 😂
There's a reason some Polish poets have spoken of their nation as a Christ-like entity, suffering for the sins of Europe. A bit far-fetched, perhaps, but like all good legends it has a grin of truth
Will be frank here, the polish-lithuanian army was actually quite competent for an european major power at the time considering the disastrous Deluge half a century before. Their main problem was their officer corp, who was mostly made up of weak noblemen politicians, with little to no readiness for a war against the innovative swedish military doctrine and officer corp. Plus the political disagreements between the noble Szclachta and king Augustus II made the loyalty of the military toward the latter's cause very difficult.
At least he got some great cardio workout.
Dont worry
Augustus has a plan
Augustus alwas has a plan
Just keep losing
I would have to, if not for the fact that he chose to declare war. I feel sad for the civilians, but Augustus? He had it coming... ^^
And just like Hannibal, Charles "knew how to win a battle but not how to use one".
but he did know how to use battles. He also knew that unless the enemy kings were deposed or surrendered under his terms that they'd be back later having prepared against swedish superiority. Tho seemingly stupid that he rejected countless peace deals, he knew precisely what he was doing
that line is such bullshit,
Marching on Rome would have put his army exhausted army between two forces, 1 of which was in a fortified city.
@@hashtagrex did he? He spent years fighting a thoroughly defeated enemy for personal reasons, ignoring potentially lucrative diplomatic opportunities at the expense of Sweden's position. He may have known his own justifications (none of which were wise) for why he was doing what he was doing, but he catastrophically misjudged the situation.
Your comments regarding kings are also very inaccurate for the example of Augustus, who had already shown that his personal authority and position was quite weak, and that he conspicuously lacked strong support within the nobility of the Commonwealth.
@@basilharpham9372 I never said it wasn't necessarily an inaccurate line - ancient adages often are. I personally agree marching on Rome was probably futile, but that is something we will never know the truth of.
However, in the context of Charles, and his incompentence in diplomacy and statecraft, who got repeatedly generous offers of peace from all of his enemies (which Hannibal never received) it is completely accurate.
@@TheSamuraijim87 and yet Augustus was unwilling to give up the title of King, nor surrender under Charles' terms. He may not have been a remarkable individual, but any opportunity given to Augustus to reinforce his position for the future was a risk Sweden couldn't take. You also seem to be ignoring that Charles *very* quickly made peace with Denmark when it was under terms he wanted. He wasn't stupid enough to believe that his enemies wouldn't try again in greater force if he left them any opportunity to stabilise and improve their armies. Are you also gonna ignore how simple Charles' terms were? All he really wanted from the war was Augustus deposed. Thats not about being personal, its about the fact that he was fighting a defensive war, which you clearly don't understand means you're perceived weak. A show of force and victory is not enough to permanently secure your position in a defensive war.
Let's say he gives in and lets both Peter and Augustus offer their peace, with trivial gains for Sweden, maybe a few territories. What happens after? The commonwealth and Russia fix the glaring issues that they exposed with their overconfident war and come back to fight Sweden much much stronger. Sweden has now lost all advantage in the future war because it didn't use it to its fullest during this one, and its armies superiority now means nothing because its numerically much smaller against improved, competent Russian and Commonwealth armies who had years to prepare to fight Sweden again. What if they bring in more allies, like they did after Poltava? What if they pass military reforms after seeing the Swedish in action and come back with the exact same tactics but with larger forces? What if they go on different military campaigns and gain thousands of elite soldiers with new tactics? It's ridiculously uninformed to say Charles was just a petty, stupid king wanting revenge. Sweden's position was one surrounded on all sides by enemies. He didn't refuse peace "at the expense" of Sweden's position. He ensured that Sweden's position changed
The battle that confirmed the fear that Charles XII's army meant business. At Narva everyone was just "Oh this was a fluke" and counted him lucky at Kliszow, now Charles XII's eyes are glowing red with malicious intent looking for Augustus II.
Augustus the strong at the beginning of the war: "hello there!"
King Charles XII: "king Augustoni, you are a bold one!"
@@iordanvassilev8091 more like you are a deposed one
his powerful voice is perfect to explain all the events what happened in history. that channel gives me lessons in history, even better than school or university. thank you a lot , Kings and Generals. i expect more history from you in the future.
Devin's voice truly shines when he's narrating how barbarians of Civ VI utilised time-travelling technologies and fielded Medieval infantry against his hoplites.
See the Caroleans standing tall, all for one and one for all.
Enemies fall at their feet, begging for their mercy.
See the Caroleans standing tall, conquer land slaughter all.
Enemies fall at their feet; victory and great defeat.
I'm loving the return of the Napoleonic background music. Really fitting for the gunpowder era
Me too
Haha I love how Epic History TV's music choices have started to spread more throughout other history channels. Although the actual composer's (Ben Hayden) tracks can be found on Filmstro.
*"KILLING GROUND! Even though you surrender,*
*TURN AROUND! you will never survive,*
*KILLING GROUND! as the Battle of Fraustadt turns!"*
Saxons: "We vastly outnumber them and still they're planning to attack us head on? Without firing a single shot no less?"
Swedes: "Cowabunga it is."
It’s almost as if the Swedes turned the field into a - dare I say - Killing Ground?
@@Psychonaut316 KILLING GROUND
AT THE BATTLE OF FRAUSTADT
TURN AROUND
YOU WILL NEVER SURVIVE
Nononono
Swedes: No bullet hits a human being without the will of god, no mather if ducks or stands, it is
@@Psychonaut316 Spotted the sabaton fan
I love the aesthetic of these maps.
It seems that the Polish can never catch a break, another great video kings 👍
Things were never the same after the Deluge.
@Persian Reich Partitioning of Poland: Are you sure about that?
Whole county is flat terrain and sandwich between big empires (Germans/Austrians,Russians,Turks) + rising Sweden .
@@howdoyouturnthison7827 Well, all Eastern Europe is a completely flat terrain
@Persian Reich Well actually the Swedish Invasion(Deluge) in 1650 was as most destructive as shit that happened in WW2. During Deluge it was first time that capitals of Poland and Lithuania were taken by enemy force(during Mongol invasions there was no Kingdom of Poland but only several dukes)
I feel we will see battle of Poltava soon. A dark day in Swedish history. Who knows what would have happened if not defeat at Poltava..
But still, what a small and poore nation as Sweden was has achieved, is just amazing and deserve our admiration!
I think the turning point was Charles' decision to go for Moscow instead of taking the fortress in Saint Petersburg
As a Swede i think we can skip that battle! It just dont have any historical significans ^^
@@Strrroke I kinda agree.
For those who didn't get it, the Russian soldiers turned their uniforms inside out because the change in color would then make them resemble Saxon soldiers to a certain degree, hoping they would not be recognized as inexperienced troops.
"Schulenburg believed that the mere presence of his superior army would be enough to rout the Swedish force." Yes, because all empirical knowledge was so clear that Swedes reacted that way to being outnumbered. They never did learn did they!
Damn, the Swedes were good. Too bad they simply didn't have the manpower to win the war.
Imagine if they had the manpower of Russia or France at that time.
They would've dumpstered Russia.
Well its very expensive to have a large proffesional army, so no the power would not change much
that was not the problem, carolus rex got drunk of his victories and should have just went back to narva region once he defeated the polish to defend his homeland instead of going into the ottoman empire and then suffered a massive defeat at poltava
@@smiIingman Fair point, but the whole point of them becoming who they were was precisely because they couldn't compete on the demographic and economic level. In this case, necessity forced them to innovate whereas had they had the same advantages as Russia, would they have innovated to do what they did?
@@fedorevdokimenko3978 lol
"See the cavalry up standing tall
Conquer lands and slaughter all
Enemies fall at their feet
Begging for their mercy!"
*epic solo follows*
Small note, it's "See the Caroleans standing tall..."
@@Handles-Suck-TH-cam oops, my mistake. I will not redact it as to let your comment make sense when someone else is reading it. But, yeah, you are totally right
"Charles turned his 👀 to Russia..." if only napoleon and uncle adolf had kings and generals 🤣
I mean if they looked at history they'd know.but then again each had their reasons of attacking so guess history couldn't dissuade them.
Napoleon was actually aware of what happened to Charles.
He just thought that he could succeed where Charles failed regardless.
@@michaelsinger4638 And Hitler were aware of Napoleon's demise in Russia - but thought he could defeat Russia/Soviet in two months time after crushing France in one month.
@@mrnygren2 History doesn't repeat, but it rhymes.
Each was justified in thinking that way. Just because it happened before, doesn't mean it'll happen again. But there's a good chance that it will.
Both took that chance.
As a Muslim, I'm no expert in European history, but I think they both had no other way if they'd hoped to at least maintain the status quo of them being at the top of Europe.
You just can't do that with Russia still standing! Just look at today! After the cold war ended...after everything that has happened, the shadow of Russian dominance over Europe started looming again!
Europe's best hope is for someone to stab Russia in the back, as in, dismantle it from the east or south into smaller states. Maybe China...Turkey or some new power in middle Asia. All of those seem extremely far fetched at the moment. China is extremely huge already, and they have no important quarrels with Russia. I am curious of what Turkey and Afganistan will look like in 50 years tho.
Turkey's been on the rise for a good 2 decades, and Taliban are doing something completely new to the world order in Afghanistan. Maybe they'll shake things up if they manage to stay in power longer this time.
As for the USA, depends if a new world war breaks out or not. If not, Russia is fine. If it does, we need to first see who's involved. I don't think Russia would side with China if a world war breaks out, neither would China side with Russia. They'd both benefit of the other two weakening each other!
Last thing that may end Russia is total economic collapse, which I don't think is as far fetched as it seems. A huge economic crisis is about to hit the world God knowing. Everyone knows that, we just don't know when. Russia and China have both been trying to become economically independent, but I don't think they've been succeeding. Depends on how firmly under the boot they can keep both their populations.
I ranted again didn't I!
Poles 100 years prior has taken Moscow, so for him it was possible, atleast in his head...
This makes me want to watch Conquest of Siberia and play Empire: Total War
Also Europa Universalis IV
@@Berat-mm6pj Idk, I tried it but there are several issues that made me give up easily.
@@lucasjleandro an Empire 2 reaching from the thirty years war until the American Civil War would be awesome
@@lucasjleandro ❤️ and Medieval 3
@@aleksapetrovic6519 dont give up on EUIV it will pay of I swear. I have over 1000 hours and another million is on the way😂❤️
Alexander: *gets crushed trying to retake warsaw*
Alexander: "I'll fuckin do it again"
Thank you for this channel. I am what you call an "amateur historian" with most of my reading and focus on wars of the 20th century. Your channel offers me an education on a variety of conflicts fought in the previous centuries. Thanks again for the history lesson!
As a swede this is a fantastic topic! Looking forward to more.
"Defeated by a much smaller Swedish army"
Quote of the day that.
Except for butchering the name of Rehnskiöld 😂(which more or less means ”reindeer-shield” in old swedish), and some of the other regional names, this was an absolutely fantastic episode! So fun to learn more about my countrys history.
I obviously understand you can’t manage to do everything but me adding a request for the future won’t do any harm I hope.
My request for future ep is one about Gustav III. He is greatly known for his huge influence on swedish culture. The capital of the island of St Barthelemy + its airport for example are both named after him. So an ep about him and the wars he fought in, although they were few, would be great to see!
Thank you so much and well done!
Love, love, LOVE, that transition from the colored map to the topographic map!!! Such great context for where the battles happened!
There so needs to be a high budget movie series on the rise and fall of the Swedish empire. It would make for a great historical drama.
There'd probably be no Swedish involvement in it or they'd use it as a backdrop for a series about some court woman or whatever.
I am not kidding when I say that most of the upper echelon of Sweden (those in the Arts community) and politicians look upon "the era of great power" as something shameful
@@Pottan23 It depends on how you sell it, the elites are snobs in a bubble whit no real convictions. Make the movie the tragedy its supposed to be. War is hell and this war was no exception. It ends Whit a desperate attack against the Russians outside of Stockholm after all. Not really a happy lucky glory ending, more like a national doomsday ending were all the men have died and the country is destroyed for two generations, you tell the true story about the war call it provocative and they'll produce it.
@@Pottan23 a black dude would play charles
Was wondering who Reinschild was until i realized that you guys totally butchered the pronounciation of Rehnskiöld😅😥 oh well
And you butchered the spelling of his name, so I guess yall are both 0-1
@@buffoonustroglodytus4688 no in this case the captivations on the video did that.
@@buffoonustroglodytus4688 no he did not, his name was Carl Gustaf Rehnskiöld
@@gunn-brittslagochetik2863 hey smartass, look again at his comment. It’s edited.
I kept thinking back to my wonderful tour of the Prague Castle with a hilarious Canadian tour guide and his melodramatic references to the existential threat of THE SWEEEEEEDES
Imagine how much balls it would take, to charge a line of cannons with swords in hand. Backed up by another line of thousands of musketeers.
Gå på! ;)
Honestly to me this time period style of warfare is the most terrifyimg
Big balls indeed but it also helped that they had a very strong religious belief that their cause was just and dying for it was a sure way to paradise.
Musketeers back then did 2 rounds per minute on a good day, and cannon did less depending on their calibre. A brisk walk followed by mass fire when you saw the whites of their eyes ensures you only encounter 1 effective volley at most before they break from the shock value of your charge
Average Banzai fan vs Average Gå på enjoyer.
The music is perfect.
poland: exist
everybody who boarder poland: you know the rules and so do i
@@Nishkid641 In that case I guess they accepted the fate of having to be someone's bitch lol. It also doesn't even make them any safer.
Actually Polish-Swedes wars started with Polish invasion of mainland Sweden at the end of 16th century.
@Alenas Kvasninas Why are Russian trolls like you so obsessed with Poland taking a miniature region in 1938? They seem to forget Warsaw did this in agreement with Prague, not Berlin.
@@goscodfilmow
"They seem to forget Warsaw did this in agreement with Prague, not Berlin."
The words of a true imbecile. Prague had no choice and was not even invited to the meetings. Our president had to wait for the decision behind closed doors while our allies conspired with Nazi monsters to betray us.
Damn, I fucking love Swedish history
Thanks for covering Swedish history in a way very few have done! All your videos are so very interesting and qualitative.
Imagine being this level Chad to make beaten king congratulate his elected opponent as part of a treaty
Great video! I think the big mistake of the Sweden King was letting Russia having a open door to the Baltic Sea while he was focusing against Augustus II
Frozen ground, ride with the wind
Emerge from the gun-smoke like demons
Rehnskiöld's men, charging their flanks
The enemy trembles with fear
The Swedish commander brought about a very impressive victory for his king. And probably helped pave the way for victory for his country. My compliments to all those who made this video a reality.
You mean those that made this reality a video?
As always, quality production and amazing storytelling, keep up the good work.
I woke up this am to find a new kings and generals video awesome. I love these videos. Keep them coming
Obligatory Sabaton reference: One by one the Saxons disband
Or die where they stand
Killing ground
Even though you surrender
Turn around
You will never survive
Killing ground
As the battle of Fraustadt turns
See the Caroleans standing tall.
All for one and one for all.
En för en, flyr Sachsens män hem
Död väntar dem
Gjuter blod
Möter döden vid Fraustadt
Syndaflod
Genom fiendens led
Gjuter blod
Ingen nåd kommer givas, där
What a battle,such tactical brilliance has been hidden in a neglected time period which held great importance,I have never heard about this war except from the Ottoman-Russo war that came shortly after,and then the previous video you made about Charles XII residence at Bender.
"Tactical brilliance ?" Bruh, he just told his army to march straight forward over an open field into fortified positions. This has all the tactical brilliance of charging a trench head on.
The reason this worked comes entirely down to the quality of the swedish soldiers, and the lack thereof on the Saxon's side.
@@ravenknight4876
I'm talking about the whole of the great northern war,mate.
@@azizbey4334 And I'm talking about the battle of Fraustadt.
@@ravenknight4876 it was tactical brilliance though lol? He managed to fool the Saxon commander, which was part of his plan. Rehnskiöld then chose a perfect location for his army to be able to fight the much larger saxon force, the ”Gå på” swedish infantry strategy was all part of the tactics + the flanking cavalry. You need a tactical mind to be able to achieve this
@@philipl7647 The tactical mind of a Lemming, I presume ?
Fantastic video on one of greatest victories in swedish military history. 👍👍
First Time this Channel used music from Epic History TV, Nice
Immediately upon receiving news of the victory, Karl XII wrote to Carl-Gustaf Rehnskiöld:
“Det syntes Mig väl vara, det som Herr Generalen beslutit. Såväl om fångarna som om Posen”.
High quality work as always guys. 15 out of 10. Fantastic
Great! This is the series that I've always been waiting for. I hope that the next episode is going to be released next week.
Agreed. It's disappointing sometimes that rare series such as the Great Northern War are being released slowly while Alexander the Great's series, which have been covered a lot by other channels, are being released quite quickly.
That makes sense. But, unlike other channels, this channel already has millions of followers, so there is no need to cover a part of history that's already been covered by others. I'd rather see this channel focuses on covering wars or campaigns that haven't been covered by other channels, such as this one. Or maybe other wars and campaigns before the lifetime of Alexander the Great such as the Achaemenid Empire conquest of Egypt, Greco-Persian Wars, and Corinthian War.
@@hananreldy4395 I mean, it takes quite some time to make each episode; this is especially true for the Great Northern War, since the war has not been explored to detail in a similar fashion (apart from that Extra Credits or whatever).
@@Leaffordes Right. The thing is that I wish this channel doesn't do too many series at the same time. I mean, it's fine if they do only 2-4 series at the same time, but not more than that. I still remember that it took more than a year to finish the Thirty Years War series. I believe that they could have done it in three months if they focused on finishing that series first before moving on to another series. I hope that I don't offend anyone by saying this.
@@vinterskugga That's right. I still remember that in the end of the last video of the Thirty Year's War series they said that they would cover wars that took place after that such as the War of Devolution and the War of the League of Augsburg. I really wish that they would cover these wars first before doing other wars and campaigns that aren't related to the Thirty Year's War.
Saxons: The enemy army is retreating. Let's pursue them and wipe them all out!
Saxons: Ok, the enemy army is ready for battle. No worry. Our army is bigger. Let's defeat them!
Saxons: Ok, looks like they are attacking us. No worry. Just stand and fight and we will win this easily. They don't even shoot at us!
Saxons:
🤣🤣🤣👍👍
So fascinating how such a small army can be so devastating. Shows the power that a great general-king can bring to the esprit-de-corps
Excellent series. I knew little about this conflict! The Swedes were epic fighters, I had no idea they were that good.
Aprendendo mais sobre a história da Europa! Parabéns pelo canal!
"Differing slightly, the accounts agree that Patkul, after a prolonged process of breaking his bones with the wheel, begged for his decapitation (crying "Kopf ab!") and rolled to the block on his own; the following decapitation did however not succeed until after several strikes."
You should continue this series!
In polish Fraustadt is called Wschowa
The swedish empire was incredible in the 17th and early 18th century ,I think there should be a video on the swedish army in the swedish empire period.
Supergreat video. Keep the good work up. I really like this series.
Amazing as always KnG!
As a long time extensive completionist of Empire Total War, I can confirm this is 100% accurate
Right back at it with another great video.
Very nice. Thank you.
Great episode and nice pronunciation of Leszczyński!
Fun fact: there is a phrase in Polish: _od Sasa do Lasa_ (from 'Sas' to 'Las') meaning something chaotic. It originated in that period, referencing the civil war between the supporters of Augustus and Leszczyński.
In Norwegian, and a lot of other languages, a phrase describing something chaotic is "Polsk riksdag". Meaning "Polish Parliament", referencing the diet during the Commonwealth era.
@@GardEngebretsen So I've heard. I can't say it was inaccurate, especially during the "Saxon times".
But his pronunciation of everything else was horrifying
@@Artur_M. Most extreme case I know was in the Polish-Swedish war of 1600-1611 where the Poles won an overwhelming victory at Kircholm, but failed to capitalise, and even conceded afterwards, because the Sejm refused to raise forces to help or even grant funds to pay the already raised army of Chodkiewicz.
@@GardEngebretsen the real tragic part is that in the late 16th century, parts of Europe used "polish accord" as a way of expressing one's belief in getting along. Because the sejm (Senate) would actually work. By the end of the 17th century, the same meaning had become an insult at people who can't come to an accord. Fascinating how the commonwealth can teach so many lessons to us if only we care to look.
This series makes me want to play Empire: Total War as Sweden 😆
While listening to the Carolus Rex album by Sabaton
@@OneTrueVikingbard Exactly! :D
have fun taking and holding moscow...
I once did that in hard difficulty, I was able to get all of Russia LOL and even managed to take Baghdad and Istanbul.
@@richardbjuhr6356 sounds like a dare! Now I want it even more :D
Killing ground
Even though you surrender
Turn around
You will never survive
Killing ground
As the battle of Fraustadt turns
Sabaton?
@@someonesilence3731 Sabaton!
I'll never look at a Swedish cookbook the same again: "Add generous amounts of salt to this dish, the same way Charles would apply it to the wounded Augustus having to congratulate Stanislaw. Mmmmm!!!"
Apply Russian portwater to burned area
The absolute balls to build city on land you yet not own
Land owned by a so-far undefeated enemy!
@@Theodre_Verany you tertible syco… Good for you 👍
Thank you , K&G .
It is very nice to hear the music “agent”from hayden. We heard it a lot when we watch the epic history’s napoleon series.Thnx k&g.
Russian army, comanded by 67 years old one eyed general kutuzov…
Like if you understand ;D
Frozen ground, ride with the wind
Emerge from the gun-smoke like demons
Rehnskiöld's men, charging their flanks
The enemy trembles with fear
One by one, the Saxons disband
Or die where they stand!
Killing ground
Even though you surrender
Turn around
You will never survive
Killing ground
As the battle of Fraustadt turns
Renskiöld is my favorite swedish general after Charles XII. Such a badass
It's funny that no one mention the dude was the military mind behind Narva and Klizow as well. Charles certainly was talented and bold but he also was smart enough to let his fathers veteran generals run things, in the beginning at least.
@@Jauhl1 Rehnsköld was charles teacher as well.
Been waiting for this one. Thrilled its here, but all of KG content has been on point lately. Well done.
See the Caroleans standing tall, all for one and one for all!
Enemies fall at their feet, begging for their mercy!
Great video! The battle was really interesting and I’m loving the new design scheme for the video!
The Saxons had no morale. They were simply hopeless against the Swedes.
Wonderful series! Thanks.
Amazing, the more episodes about Commonwealth, the better :D
Please do a video about the First Battle of Nördlingen (1634). There is only a video about the second one but not the first one
haha the name of the swedish cavalry commander hummerhielm, it literally means lobster helmet xD
The "lobster-tailed pot helmet" was an extremely popular form of head protection throughout the the 17th century, especially with cavalrymen.
"Hummerhielm" was probably not his real name, but rather an honorific or nickname that he earned for being an exceptional cavalry commander if I had to guess
@@stevensonbak But that is how most noblemen got their name which they still have today, (in Sweden atleast) by great deeds in battle.
@@torodensson1331 No it's not.
@@stevensonbak True about the existence of such a helmet, but 'Hummerhielm' was not a nickname, it was indeed his real surname once he was ennobled (previously, it was just 'Hummer').
@@xergiok2322 So before his ennoblement he was just Mr Lobster 🙂
Killing ground
Even though you surrender
Turn around
You will never survive
Killing ground
At the battle of Fraustadt
Got to give it to Peter the Great for trying again and again and succeeding in modernising their army, navy and state.
I don't think his army improved much throughout the war. But I can give Peter some credit for some tactically smart things he would do. Like the T-shaped line of redoubts at Poltava that caused devestating losses for the Swedish army. That formation was brilliant in the sense that it created the oppurtunity for flanking fire. And if you attack a redoubt with a line formation with a company, then can you theoretically kill 250 men with just one lucky cannon ball shot from the side. So the flanking fire was deadly.
Peters handling of his invasion of Finland was also smart. Finland was a country too poor to feed a large Russian invasion army no matter how brutaly it would plunder the Finnish population. So food supplies had therefore to come from Russia. And the only way to get them to Finland was by sea since the road network in Finland was non-existent. The problem was that the Swedish navy was superior so transporting food by sea would not work.
But Peter then changed his plans, and attacked Finland during the months while the Swedish navy was stuck in Stockholm and had to wait until the ice had melted before it could set sail to Finland. But then would the first phase of the Russian invasion already have been acomplished.
Peter also reintroduced the galley into warfare in the Baltic sea. And it proved to be excellent in the shallow waters along the Finnish coast and the waters near Stockholm. The Swedish deep water navy was superior but could not follow the galleys into the shallow waters and destroy them.
ok
@@Theodre_Verany
The battle was lost due to incompetence of the Swedish cavalry generals Hamilton and Creutz who squandered the Swedish battle plan of a surprise attack on the redoubts with their long delay. Many of the redoubts were conquered and passed and the attacking Russian cavalry was beaten back. So even with this disasterous start there was still hope for a win that day.
Then it was time for the next idiot to enter this story: Roos who commanded a large chunk of the Swedish infantry.
After his troops had conquered the 2nd redoubt a silence had suddenly fallen on the battlefield. Roos and his 4 battallions were suddenly standing alone at the redoubts and the Swedish army had moved on. And Roos had no idea where to go to link up with the main force.
The idiot then decided to attack a redoubt alone just for fun and got half of the men in the (inofficially) elite regiment from Dalarna killed and all its officers dead. The attempt to take it was aborted. And he began a retreat and looked for the rest of the army. The Russians saw this lone force and understood what had happened and sent out a strong force to destroy it - which they did.
And the Swedish army realized that it had suffered losses during the morning. And they prefered to wait hours for Roos to reinforce the army, but he never came. So the surprise attack of the Russian camp never happened.
The commander of the highest responsability of the battle: Rehnskiöld had acted as an arrogant idiot the entire day.
He had been rude towards Lewenhaupt and others, and he had not bothered to inform other officers about the battle plan before the battle - which caused much confusion, and idiots like Roos did therefore not know where to go with his forces.
When some scouts had spotted the main army moving out from the Russian camp to go into battle, he did refuse to believe the news. He was too arrogant and assumed that the Russian army would remain passive and always avoid battle - like it always had done the last 2 years.
This arrogant underestimation of Russia, did delay a Swedish response. And when he finally took his horse to see for himself the Russian troop movements, then he finally would react. But then the respons wast hastily and badly planned and organized - like everything else the Swedish army did this day.
He lined up his infantry - 4000 men, to attack a Russian force of 28.000. The Swedish cavalry was supposed to help the infantry. But because of thick forrests on the sides of the battle lines was it impossible to line up the cavalry, so it had to walk behind the infantry and being unable to support it for a long time if fighting would begin.
The Swedish infantry attacked the Russian line. The infantry on Swedens left got deleyed, while the Swedish right pushed onwards through a thunderstorm of Russian artillery, and managed to push back the Russian army. The Russian first line was crushed and start fleeing. And in earlier battles would this be a sign that victory was near. A numerical advantage quickly turns into a disadvantage as panic and stampede enters the mix.
But as the Swedes push forward and gained ground on Russias expense, did the left side finally come into contact with the Russian troops a bit later, and they were quickly pushed back as Russia had their best regiments on the right side of the Russian line.
It was now or never. Soon the line would break for either side. The Swedish cavalry could come in on the left and stabalize the front line while the infantry on the right would roll up the Russian line and win this battle.
But that would never happen. The Swedish cavalry was sitting on their asses near the forrest and had not yet even formed up for battle as their friends in the infantry got murdered by the Russian over-might.
Finally did a few squadrons get ready and moved towards the left. But then it was already too late. The cowards in Närke-Värmlands regiment and Östergötland had begun to flee and desert. and the Swedish line fell apart like a house of cards. And the Swedish cavalry squadrons arrived, but it was too little too late and they were soon cut to pieces. The Russian infantry and cavalry on the Swedish left moved on and encircled and massacred nearly all of Upplands regiment. And then they moved on and destroyed one regiment after another on the Swedish left.
And soon there was nothing left of the Swedish infantry.
And sure, the Russian military victory was total. 50,000 people were lost at Poltava and Perevolotjna.
And the Russians captured lots of guns, musical instruments, flags, silver, Swedish plunder from other military campaigns in the Baltics, Poland and Germany, horse saddles, muskets, swords and other things in gigantic amounts.
The battle could have ended differently, but many oppurtunities were wasted. What if Rehnskiöld had informed his men about his plan and prepared for battle in good time so the surprise attack would have failed? Rehnskiöld believed that a fast surprise attack would have made it possible to storm the forts easily without much bloodshed.
So to not delay the army he did not carry any big cannons with him. And no ladders to climb on had been prepared. No fascines had been prepared to climb over ditches and moats. No hand grenades were distributed for storming a castle - none of the usual equipment and preparations for attacking a fortified position had been done.
So no wonder that it ended up in a bloodshed.
And when the Russian redoubts started to fire, then the Swedish troops had not lined up and a new battle plan had to be created there and then, under all firing and confusion. And many formations marched to the wrong spot.
One can wonder what would have happened if Roos and his men had joined the Swedish army and stormed the Russian camp. What if the Swedish army had brought its many artillery pieces to the battle this day, could that have bended the odds enough in Swedens favor?
What would have happened if Närke-Värmlands regiment had hold out for a little longer and the cavalry coming to their rescue?
The Swedish cavalry was after all the only thing in which the Swedes had a numerical superiority over the Russians, and yet this was the most badly used resource of the Swedish army this day.
Roos, Creutz, Rehnskiöld and Hamilton lost this battle, along with the cowards in Närke-Värmlands infantry regiment.
@@Theodre_Verany
*"What you fail to take into account is the fact that those positions that the Swedes were trying to break through were held by the Russian front line units only."*
The redoubts were to some extent taken. There was however many ways this problem could have been dealt with in better ways.
1. A succesful surprise attack with cavalry.
2. Stormning them with artillery, faschines, hand grenades, ladders, poles with ropes for climbing and so on..
3. Avoid the redoubt line, and instead move the army to the western side of the Russian camp and then attack it.
Thereby could the fighting in the redoubts be avoided all togheter.
*"They still had loads of reserves to plug holes in the lines"*
As I said earlier, even when the Russian infantry outnumbered the Swedish 28.000 vs 4000 did the Swedes nearly break the Russian line as in earlier battles where Russia lost to Sweden despite gigantic numerical superiority.
War back then was more about psychology than about numbers and weapons technology.
*"The fact of the matter is that at no time in the battle were the Russians close to routing"*
The infantry attack on the Russian line nearly routed it. Tsar Peter was also fearful about his hopes about winning the battle after the first redoubts had been fallen and a Russian cavalry attack had beaten back... and he probably thought to himself... now its time again for one humiliating defeat despite numerical superiority... its Narva, Düna, Saladen, Jakobstadt, Fraustadt, Holowczyn all over again...
But he kept his calm and didn't decide to give up all hopes of a Russian victory yet, and good for him to taking that decision.
*"The Swedes on the other hand were suffering horrific casualties the moment they started their advance"*
Nowhere did I ever deny that the storming of the redoubts became a costly affair. The commanders had no battle plan. The troops were not yet in formation. They had no artillery - unlike the Russians. And they had no tools prepared to storm the forts.
And numerical advantage was more of a problem than an advantage in circumstances like this. The russians did not have to aim to hit something, and so many men flocked around the redoubts that it became impossible to move. Retreating men blocked the way of men moving forward to attack and everything was chaos. Men had no escalades to climb up on the forts so they were easily gun down or cut to pieces once they managed to climb up on the walls.
So no surprises here.
Swedish solidiers died because they were not prepared. And the Russians had well prepared defensive positions.
The high losses was not because the Russian army had become much better than 9 years before. If it was better, then I doubt it would play a defensive game behind a wall like cowards.
When it later that day finally came a field battle between the Swedish army and the Russian army. Then had many men already died at the redoubts. And Roos the retard and walked away with a quarter of the Swedish infantry into nowhere.
And even despite all this did the Swedish army attack. And Russian cannons fired a hell storm of artillery fire for 9 minutes, before the Swedish army finally made contact with the Russian infantry and deadly fired a volley at close range and charged with swords and bayonets, and the first Russian line began to flee.
So no the artillery bombardment later that day did not inflict that much losses. Most losses happened when the line was broken and men started to flee - like in most other battles of the 1700s.
So that moment when Närke-Värmlands regiment started to flee was the moment when Russia finally won this battle. From that moment was there nothing the Swedes could do victory from the jaws of defeat.
*"Even if my some miracle Sweden won the battle of Poltava that would achieve nothing other than a hollow victory."*
Another victory like Narva could have destroyed Russian fighting morale and triggered an uprising and civil war in Russia. Ukrainian Zaporogs and cossacks would feel less hesitation about joining the Swedes. The supply problems in southern Russia would be solved. Fighting morale would be restored.
And perhaps would also the Ottomans and Persians feel tempted to join in on the destruction of Russia.
@@Theodre_Verany
*"saw his army logistically ruined through the Russian scorched earth tactics"*
Ukraine offered much food for the Swedish army and it would not be possible to burn food in all directions. Especially not with Ukrainians on Swedens side and a Russian army on retreat after a lost battle
*"The Russian population and army was never going to have a collapse in moral no matter how many battles Charles won"*
The collapse of Russia in 1917 illustrates well that Russian patientence is not endless. Russia had fought for 9 years and lost battle after battle. Church bells had been melted to make artillery. Taxes had been raised. Russian losses had been much higher than Swedish ones - including those during the winter and the scorched earth campaigns.
And the Tsars westernization program was not popular among all. There existed many reasons for people to rise up against the Tsar.
*"The whole reason Charles was heading for the Ukraine was because his attempt on Moscow had already failed"*
Partly that, but partly also that he hoped that he could join forces with the Ottomans.
*"Russia was gathering strong allies in Europe"*
Denmark and Saxony had walked out from the war. Poland had been taken over by a Swedish puppet. And after the humiliating defeat at Narva did Russian diplomats in Europe reporting back home that everyone was laughing at them. Russia had become the laughing stock in Europe, and the diplomats felt bullied and the butt of every joke people made.
*"was ravaging Finland"*
Nope. Finland fell in 1713. And the main army of Sweden was fighting on the western front.
*"raiding the Swedish heartland"*
The last years of the war after the King had died, and the country had been taken over by a weak leadership.
Even so did the Russian army manage to humiliate itself at the battle of Stäket and managed to lose against an enemy it outnumbered 3 to 1.
So I still not believe that the Russian army improved much throughout the war.
*"had beaten the Swedish fleet as sea"*
Nope. The Swedish high sea fleet still dominated the Baltic sea.
*"he was going to dethrone the Russian leadership rather than negotiate a peace, because that was never going to happen"*
The goal was to retake the lands that other countries had stolen. I consider that to be a reasonable moderate minimum demand he made.
And none of the men he had to deal with deserved any trust since all had betrayed him before. Peter the Great had promised peace with Sweden barely a year before it started the war. And the cousins August of Saxony and the King of Denmark had betrayed a man of the same blood.
So yeah, I would not have any belief in any peace promises from those guys either. If anything he was too kind to them. August should have been dethroned and beheaded.
And the defeat at Poltava also showed that neither Denmark and Saxony cared anything about honor, since they happily broke their peace deal as soon they got the chance.
*"Charles XII was a capable tactician and a fool of grand strategy"*
Charles XII was a capable tactician and a fool of grand strategy. He capable advisors around him as a teenager.
And he himself could also produce great battle plans. Like the invasion of Norway. And had he not died and it succeded then would Denmark be knocked out of the war, and Swedish troops could now be shipped to the Baltics to retake this nearly undefended area from the Russians. And without shipments of food from the Baltic ports would the Russian army in Finland either had to retreat or to be starved to death due to lack of food (The food supplies in Finland was inadequate for feeding an army of 30.000 men, so the food therefore had to become from Russia with ships).
And thereby would Sweden be able to also retake Finland at a low cost. So he Charles war plan made much sense and is brilliant in my opinion. It would also be extra interesting to see what could have happened if Britain also joined in into the war.
you are a legend. daily videos of great interest. Thankyou!
I love this series! Will you guys continue it?
Love the different series. Glad I found your channel and enjoying binge watching. Have you done anything about Bavaria? Trying to find out more about why my family came to the US in the mid 1700's.
Dammit, I can’t but root for the Carolus but when you know your history, you can only dread the episodes on Poltava and the siege of Fredrikshald
Great video!
Was a bit late on watching the last video so I just finished it now.
Wondered when the next would come and boom. There you are 😄
Another great episode
again and again and again ad infinitum K&G delivers awesome content. thank you for your hard work
What a great video!! You are the best!
Best channel in youtube
Charles XII was the latest king that was fighting in the frontline of an empire, that's why he's the latest true warrior king
The double envelopment here was not like Hannibal in Cannae. It was like Scipio Africanus in Zama. Scipio's method was to collapse the flanks with superior troops and do an encirclement. While Hannibal's method was to lure the enemy into a center circle with his weaker troops and then shut the door on the flanks.
The research you guys do are amazing
Great video
"Killing Ground" is Sabatons song of this battle.