Keyline® in the AR Sandbox #3: Design for Water

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 47

  • @anthonyburke5656
    @anthonyburke5656 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    To understand Yeomans, you need to appreciate that he was from an era of very expensive energy. He designed his systems to be able to provide water to the maximum area of land with minimum expenditure of energy, hence his primary reservoir was at the highest economic point in his landscape AND he moved water whenever possible NOT surrendering the gravity energy.

  • @AloshaLynov
    @AloshaLynov 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Best key line presentation I have seen. I got it for je first time after studying permaculture for 10 years

    • @amillison
      @amillison  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thanks and that means a lot to me. It took me having a workshop with Darren Doherty before I was able to grasp it in 2007. It is somewhat of a complex equation!

    • @AloshaLynov
      @AloshaLynov 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Andrew thank u for your reply. I would love to chat to you about a possible collaboration. We have an online course on water and dome home building. And would like to know if we can share it with your students at 50% comm back to you ? Www.bioveda.co/domehome we also have the courses separate water / dome

  • @sarahhewlett2366
    @sarahhewlett2366 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Wow! I’ve been trying to understand Keyline all day, and wishing for a sandbox demonstration. This is amazing. It’s all clicking now.

  • @jamofakind
    @jamofakind 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What an incredible educational piece! Thank you for explaining this so clearly.

  • @michaeljames8594
    @michaeljames8594 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant Andrew Millison! Awesomely clear, coherent and professional. Very helpful.

  • @cjoarder
    @cjoarder 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wow...this is a wonderful simulation and presentation. I am reading Yoman's book and this simulation clears many important concepts presented in the book. Thanks for sharing this video. Hope to see more from you in future. God Bless you!

    • @amillison
      @amillison  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Glad to help. That book is very difficult to get through and understand. I read it multiple times, and finally understood the system after learning with Darren Doherty of the Regrarians, who is the foremost Keyline teacher in the world.

  • @wudangmtn
    @wudangmtn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Excellent presentation; I feel like I am finally starting to understand this concept after much confusion from other sources.

  • @OBRfarm
    @OBRfarm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hell yes! Just found your TH-cam channel. Seriously awesome.

  • @johnsmiff8328
    @johnsmiff8328 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Very helpful! I wish more math was involved, it seems like key points could be described really quickly as inflection points in the elevation curves.

    • @FarfettilLejl
      @FarfettilLejl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      "I wish more math was involved" is not a sentence I ever said in my life

    • @FlyingcupNsourcer
      @FlyingcupNsourcer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Get thee to a hydrology course!

    • @aenorist2431
      @aenorist2431 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Its true though, in fact PA Yeomans explicitly defines them as inflection points. However, Andrew is trying to be understood by everyone, not just those of us affected by mathbrain syndrome :P

  • @nikkizgb
    @nikkizgb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you this is so helpful and really easy to follow. Much appreciated.

  • @ForagersGarden
    @ForagersGarden 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for uploading these!!

  • @carloscardoso1342
    @carloscardoso1342 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excelent job. I have watch many of your videos and helpme a lot. regrards from Colombia.

  • @chalisblur
    @chalisblur 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much for sharing this awesome approach and knowledge. Keep well and stay blessed!

  • @khaitrilachong7619
    @khaitrilachong7619 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am new into farming .. you made things clear and easy to understand. Thanks for sharing this critical info in farming.

  • @feaale
    @feaale 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very clear explanation. Thank you

  • @titchc3657
    @titchc3657 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very helpful explanation, thanks again.

  • @JB-yg3ew
    @JB-yg3ew 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is rad, thanks.

  • @twbishop
    @twbishop ปีที่แล้ว

    @1:04 a key point is an inflection point in mathematics.

  • @nnelg6587
    @nnelg6587 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    do you have any thoughts on dumping massive amounts of brush down into a primary valley over years? Is this problematic for some reason? Will it build out the ridge over time?

  • @intrepid-crossing2356
    @intrepid-crossing2356 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    7:26 the green lines are keylines that divert the water across the ridge?
    what is the difference with swales? do swales go along the contour lines, or do they gradually descend from one contour line to the next?

    • @amillison
      @amillison  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The green lines represent the cultivation pattern. So that could mean how a field is plowed, or it could mean the orientation of orchard rows. They are now swales, but just the pattern by which rows of crops or cultivation lines are oriented.
      In the wider world, a swale just means a low area where water flows. But in Permaculture-speak, a swale usually refers to a water harvesting ditch placed on contour. I like to use the terminology of "on contour" or "off contour" swales, because then that can be understood by people who only know about permaculture and also people who are fluent in the language of civil engineering and landscape architecture.

    • @amillison
      @amillison  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@intrepid-crossing2356 There is a ton of confusion out there so that's why I say on or off-contour swales. Keyline is a very specific set of methods and people throw the terms around without really having a grasp on the terminology of the *trademarked* system. In the Keyline design system, water management structures are typically sloped from valley to ridge forms. On-contour swales are level in the landscape. But which strategy to use depends a lot on your soils, climate, and rainfall regime . There are two primary sources I would refer you to: www.amazon.com/Water-Every-Farm-Yeomans-Keyline/dp/1438225784
      www.regrarians.org/product/regrarians-ehandbook-3-water/

  • @frictionhitch
    @frictionhitch 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You need to speak to the Colorado river states. Why are we still using Lake Mead to evaporate 1 million acre feet of water per year(3 times Nevada's entire allocation) when we have the Rockies?

  • @sebastianwrites
    @sebastianwrites 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Understand there's quite a bit of regulation, but to speak of this almost excessively risks putting people off when this is well worth doing!

  • @ronaldcoleman9370
    @ronaldcoleman9370 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    SO ON THE UPPER RIDGE COLLECTION SYSTEM, DO YOU BUILD THE CATCHMENT SYSTEMS OUT OF CLAY TO RETAIN THE WATER AND MANAGE SATURATION THAT CAUSES MUD/LAND SLIDES???

  • @hudson8865
    @hudson8865 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you.

  • @VCJyJ2010
    @VCJyJ2010 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Andrew, I love your videos and your work and I love that some of you videos have subtitles or are dubbed in Spanish so I can share them with my people back in Chile. Talking about Chile I have a question, This model with key points is applicable to all hills? my family has a hillside property and I was trying to design some ponds but I can’t find a key point in my contour map. I wonder if I’m doing something wrong or there are exceptions to this model. Hills in my country looks don’t like bells. I’m hoping you’ll see this comment…😊

  • @cherrytreepermaculture756
    @cherrytreepermaculture756 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Andrew, I'm curious if keyline design was used for the MJK vineyards? I'm in an area with a lot of vineyards and they are mainly conventional monocultures, with rows going vertically for ease of tractor use.

    • @amillison
      @amillison  4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The MJK vineyards are on-contour terraces. At that time I did not really know about the option of sloping those terraces towards the ridges, but that would be interesting to see.

  • @VincentMillet1
    @VincentMillet1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I saw these mini canals in Bali

  • @Teshia
    @Teshia 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    These presentations are fascinating and I was wondering how you do this with active modeling of the waterflow?

  • @jopalo31675
    @jopalo31675 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s probably not in your capacity, but a smaller scale project would be wonderful. 8-16 acres would helpful. It’s probably easier to implement then larger municipal projects.

  • @nephilimPB
    @nephilimPB 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So why put the cultivation lines off contour? It seems like it would lead to erosion and hollowing of those rows. Why not stay on contour and make the water soak in?

  • @joefeinstein6804
    @joefeinstein6804 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What do you do on very flat land?

  • @amythinks
    @amythinks ปีที่แล้ว

    What if these high keypoint ponds end up creating a spring somewhere down the landscape that is destructive to a building or something.

  • @BikeAndFish1
    @BikeAndFish1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Woow........

  • @r4ranjith
    @r4ranjith 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1.5x speed still sounds like normal talking speed

  • @TreyNitrotoluene
    @TreyNitrotoluene 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Glad I live in Missouri. Just dont flood your neighbors yard and build under 35 ft.

  • @DaDunge
    @DaDunge ปีที่แล้ว

    Don't like the use of ponds. open water means you lsoe water to evaporaiton. Much better to let water go to groundwater. Also is this meant to be the surface of the earth the O-horizon or the bedrock?

  • @whowereweagain
    @whowereweagain 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You said "peepoint"