1965 What are the PRINCIPLES OF ELECTRICITY? by General Electric (Science, Electronics, Batteries)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ส.ค. 2022
  • For review and discussion, we look at "What is Electricity Exactly?" Educational and historical content, this 1965 GE film provides some of the best detailed explanation of what it is and how it works. A somewhat rare film, with clear examples and explanations. Terms and Topics include: electrons, voltage, amperage, watts, current, magnetism, ohm's law, resistance, batteries, generators, uses of electricity, electrical measurements, Tesla coil, lightning, experiments, and more. Do you think this can be taught in schools today? Hope you find it interesting. Runtime: 19 mins. Uploaded by Computer History Archives Project (CHAP).
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 136

  • @danielmwangi3964
    @danielmwangi3964 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I believe old scientific films like this one explain the fundamental principles of science in a more comprehensible way.

  • @WDCallahan
    @WDCallahan ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Conversation between two atoms:
    "I think I've lost an electron!"
    "Are you sure?"
    "Yes. I'm POSITIVE."

  • @boobayloo
    @boobayloo ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I love the honesty, "we don't know what electricity is" ....
    Today nobody knows, but they act as if they know...
    The truth is that we understand how we can use, but not what it is...

    • @tanner1985
      @tanner1985 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Exactly what I was thinking right now.

  • @perge_music
    @perge_music ปีที่แล้ว +82

    I do much prefer the way information was presented back before the 80s, they would just tell you how stuff worked in a frank way without any frills, documentaries about science or engineering turned into a series of special effects where the makers seem to believe that no-one would be interested in the subject so needed to be distracted with nonsense. The Assent Of Man or Cosmos are still the benchmarks IMO of how to make science interesting and educational. No-one learns anything from TV these days, it's all 'well this is an idea of how we think electricity works but if you believe it's different then that's equally valid'.

    • @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject  ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Hi Matthew, very well stated! Have to say, I agree with you're observations. So much has been "dumbed down" for public consumption that the opportunity today to teach large numbers of people with quality educational material is so often wasted. Thanks very much for your feedback! ~ Victor, CHAP

    • @glory6998
      @glory6998 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agreed

    • @nickharrison3748
      @nickharrison3748 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      we only have common sense. So, all descriptions should match common sense

    • @prashkd7684
      @prashkd7684 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Absolutely. Back then the experts really wanted people to undserstand the technology, now everyone is just showing off they C++ skills.

    • @francoamerican4632
      @francoamerican4632 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Matthew Stringer Many viewers would rather watch things like Living With the Kardadshians and Dancing With the Starz! Gossip and drama gets high ratings which means more dollars generated in advertising revenue. A straight forward show about science isn't going to garner the kind of $$$ that the network execs are looking for.

  • @W1RMD
    @W1RMD 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I miss the way people used to speak. In a world of "hash tag" "af" and "og" it's refreshing to hear someone who pronounces the "H" in the words "what and while". Thanks for posting.

  • @videolabguy
    @videolabguy ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Thank you for another trip down memory lane.
    The videotape recorders shown at 0:15 are Ampex VR-1000s. Two inch tape, moving at 15 IPS, four video heads on a 2.6 inch wheel spinning at 14,400 RPM was able to record a full 4.5MHz bandwidth video signal.

    • @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Videolabguy, thanks for spotting the Ampex VR-1000s! I knew you'd ID this machine. Thanks! : )

    • @jamesslick4790
      @jamesslick4790 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Even in this 8K UHD digital video world, I am STILL impressed with videotape. Compare the innards and working of an 20 year old $50 K Mart VCR and a the same of a current DVD or BluRay player: There's a LOT going on in the tape machine that makes it one impressive feat of engineering AND precision manufacturing. The fact that Ampex got this tech together and was commercially sold BEFORE stereo LPs were available is just amazing! Fun Fact: Since our city (Lil 'ol Pittsburgh,PA) didn't have cable available until the early 1980's, I am one of the few that can say that we (our family) had a VCR before we had cable! (1978 VS 1981). 🤔😲

    • @thesteelrodent1796
      @thesteelrodent1796 ปีที่แล้ว

      Danish national television got their first VR-1000 in 1959 and used the old tape system (on continuously improved machines) up until the late 1970s, long after they switched to broadcasting in colour. They got colour capable machines in 1968, but it depended on what they broadcast whether it was recorded in colour or B/W. First broadcast recorded in Denmark on the VR-1000 was the King's 60 year birthday celebration in 1959, and they recorded that purely as a test, only to decide it was so good it was worthy of being broadcast in the news that same night. That instantly proved that it was worthwhile to record everything on video.

  • @pasupuletivenkatesh4642
    @pasupuletivenkatesh4642 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Explanation was just awesome.

  • @nalin31081
    @nalin31081 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    worth watching again and again. one of the great documentaries I have come across.

    • @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Nalin, thank you for your great feedback. Glad you enjoyed this video from the past... ~ Victor, CHAP

  • @tpcdude
    @tpcdude ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I wonder what GE computer that was...ok GE 210 .. hate it when you guys are so good you answer my questions before you read them .. magic

    • @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Gerry, you got it. Well, we wished they gave us more than 15 seconds look at the GE 210. It's a monster of a machine and quite rare.

    • @tpcdude
      @tpcdude ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject Yep you wonder where the films of GE computer group are. Even the Wiki stuff doesn't go too deep ..

    • @nyki7fykxtjxyi
      @nyki7fykxtjxyi ปีที่แล้ว

      Not y2k ready

  • @nightskymusic5163
    @nightskymusic5163 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love this 90's documentary style video

  • @jayantbalyan1321
    @jayantbalyan1321 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Best way of explaining the concept.

  • @neilmartin1111
    @neilmartin1111 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When I was training to do my electrical exams in 1977 i would of loved this vid

  • @renatoamaral8259
    @renatoamaral8259 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video, informative and didactic even today!!! ❤️❤️💝

  • @yogi9631
    @yogi9631 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I just love these older style of documentaries.
    They have a unique quality to them. Perhaps an earthly tone in their voices etc. Or perhaps they explain it at a slower pace.....
    More a-tuned to my brain/learning skills 🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi YOGi, glad you enjoyed this vintage tech film. Hope you will check out our other tech films as well. ~ Charles, CHAP

  • @padipucast
    @padipucast ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for this video , Keep uploading these types of videos 😇👍

  • @nalin31081
    @nalin31081 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @2:50 I thought there was no background music in old documentaries till I reached here...

  • @TheNobbynoonar
    @TheNobbynoonar ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very informative. Somehow, I cannot see this film being used in schools nowadays. Anyway, thanks for putting this out there.

    • @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Sid, Glad you enjoyed the video. Hope you will explore the other videos we have uploaded as well. ~ Victor, CHAP

    • @TheNobbynoonar
      @TheNobbynoonar ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject Very much so. Thank you.

    • @ronniechilds2002
      @ronniechilds2002 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think you're right about that. Kids' attention spans wouldn't be able to handle it.

  • @selvamg1600
    @selvamg1600 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very good explanation and documentary presentation

  • @thesteelrodent1796
    @thesteelrodent1796 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love these old education film. The end is odd, though. After all that detailed explanation, they don't bother to explain the differences between DC and AC. They only show DC power generation and then at the end show an AC turbine generator (or was that a turban?). There's also a lot more to power generation than just swinging a magnet around, put perhaps that's more of a "part 2" kind of thing

  • @frankowalker4662
    @frankowalker4662 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    That was well done.

  • @skabbymuff111
    @skabbymuff111 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant, thanks.

  • @IsmoyoRiamah
    @IsmoyoRiamah ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you very much for your sharing video.
    It Is very helpfull to understand electricity.
    I have been waiting for your next videos.
    Best regard
    Ismoyo Riamah
    Indonesia

    • @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Ismoyo, thank you very much for your feedback. Glad you enjoyed this video. We have many other videos on vintage technologies that you may find interesting. Have fun exploring them! ~ Victor, at CHAP

  • @TharunKumar-yx8cy
    @TharunKumar-yx8cy ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wonderful !

  • @chunfung8934
    @chunfung8934 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why can’t we just make videos like this anymore?

  • @Greg_Chase
    @Greg_Chase ปีที่แล้ว +4

    On the subject of aligned electron spins (aka 'aligned magnetic domains') as the source of magnetic fields:
    Walther Gerlach (of the Stern-Gerlach Experiment) co-discovered electron spin, which was determined to be the cause of magnetic fields when the electron spins in a sample are aligned in the same direction (in iron, cobalt, and nickel).
    Gerlach led a project in ww2 for the german army (he was german) - Germany in the 1940s was just as dependent on external sources of energy as they are today (russian fuels in our times). Gerlach led a team investigating Z-pinch fusion, an early 'hot fusion' technique that failed due to plasma instabilities. It was an investigation into a possible energy source.
    Gerlach's team added a rotational shear (a rotating cylinder) to the Z-pinch reactor, attempting to solve the plasma instability problem. The device ended up being a centrifuge with two electrodes - positive and negative, one on top, the other on the bottom - arranged on the vertical axis of the rotating containment cylinder. Basically, just a Z-pinch fusion device like those of their times with a rotating containment shell.
    Their 'working fluid' for their modified consisted of mercury, thorium and beryllium. This was NOT the standard working fluid of Z-pinch reactors tested in other countries.
    It's not known if the radioactive working fluid combined with rotational shear (the rotating cylinder) led to a Z-pinch fusion that attained "break-even plus" output. The project was near the end of the war.
    This project was known as "Die Glocke", or 'The Bell' in english.
    I mention this because Gerlach's discovery of electron spin in the 1920s, and the fast follow-on (also in the 1920s) that aligned electron spin in samples (the so-called 'aligned magnetic domains') was also quickly followed by discovery in the 1920s of the Exchange Interaction, which causes spin alignment in adjacent charged particles - including protons and electrons.
    When the Z-pinch pulse fires across its two electrodes, the plasma forms from the working fluid as in standard Z-pinch devices of the time.
    But in Gerlach's modified Z-pinch machine - when the electrons are dissociated from the atoms of the working fluid, the electrons remain close to the axis of rotation. The heavier ions are taken up by centrifugal force by the rotating cylinder.
    If the Exchange Interaction manifests during the pulse-ON-time of the device among the ions collected at the rotating wall, the nuclei may well align their spins.
    It is not unnatural to think that Dr. Gerlach, already aware of the (magnetic) field effects that manifest in aligned electron spins - may have wondered if any field effects might develop with aligned nuclei spins during the 'ON' part of the pulse.
    I work with a small team of hobbyists developing a copy of this device, with one exception - we are using Galinstan as our working fluid, which is the non-toxic alternative to mercury. Indium in the Galinstan mixture has a nuclear spin of 9/2, the highest nuclear spin known, matched by bismuth.
    .
    .

    • @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hi Greg, fascinating. I think you are talking above my "pay grade" but very interesting nevertheless. Thank you for the explanations! ~ VK

    • @tanner1985
      @tanner1985 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, that's interesting!

  • @nickharrison3748
    @nickharrison3748 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very Nice documentary

  • @rickynaidoo2921
    @rickynaidoo2921 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Educational

  • @markarca6360
    @markarca6360 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:03 - The famous experiment of Benjamin Franklin (the man in the $1 bill) who flew a kite with a silk string during a thunderstorm with a key tied to the end of the string. He concluded that lightning is a form of electricity. (Static electricity, to be precise).

  • @MistahJigglah
    @MistahJigglah ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It's crazy that teachers still often describe electricity with the antiquated example of water pressure.
    The way electricity actually works is endlessly weirder.

    • @MistahJigglah
      @MistahJigglah ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/bHIhgxav9LY/w-d-xo.html

    • @MistahJigglah
      @MistahJigglah ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lucasrem
      Universal 220 wasn't feasible in the US at the time, but 110 should have been phased out in the 70s, though retaining the superior 60hz, because like 3, 60 is a magic number.

    • @MistahJigglah
      @MistahJigglah ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lucasrem
      To quote an Indian guy from the 19th century who's name I can't remember and google isn't giving me any help.
      "60 has such a universality as to be naturally elegant"

    • @perge_music
      @perge_music ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you're casually explaining the behaviour of electricity and what V I R means to someone then going to the water pressure example is the easiest way. If you start trying to explain how it really works you'll lose them. If they're interested in knowing more then you can go into it.

    • @perge_music
      @perge_music ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@MistahJigglah the reason Europe ran at a higher voltage than the US was because of WW1&2; it had no money and running at a higher voltage meant that the conductors on the grid could be smaller. With the thousands of miles of cable on a grid running higher saved a lot of money. It's also why European organs always sounded thinner than their American counterparts (listen to an Elka versus a Hammond for example) was because their copper windings were thinner.

  • @rhymesrahasya664
    @rhymesrahasya664 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just loved the documents woow

  • @prestonburton8504
    @prestonburton8504 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you for bringing this wonderful record back from the past -

    • @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Preston, very glad you enjoyed it. ~ Victor

    • @prestonburton8504
      @prestonburton8504 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject I put myself through collage working on tube color tv sets - i'd learned how in the early 70s - i was very interested in electronics. By late 70s, I worked on the first automated transistor NC machines (ge 100, pratt and witney tape-o-matic) and then got into power generation and energy - I'm very blessed as my career has been so fulfilled (not money- but the thirst for this experience) I've been in every part of a Westinghouse steam 1GW x 2 station - and even made equipment for those - I trust that these videos will instill this thirst for the same magic i saw that drove me. Its not just video games - This is how the real games are done! God Bless!

    • @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Preston, sounds pretty awesome an experience! I know that "NC" is the numerical control machines. Not familiar with the "1GW x 2," one Gigawatt electrical generator? They made some heavy duty equipment, that is for sure. You have got some great experience to look back on. Thanks for sharing that bit of history! ~ Victor, CHAP

    • @prestonburton8504
      @prestonburton8504 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject giga-watt. more commonly know at 1000Mega-Watt pressurized water in standard configuration. Pretty much always two reactors and two turbines. Just like the their fathers, the coal steam powered stations. Nothing really changed, except that the steam generated from fission, not burning of coal, oil or now, nat gas. there were others, but that most common.

    • @prestonburton8504
      @prestonburton8504 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      also, the reason for that configuration? because those plants served base load - which at the time, no realistic projection of the electrical demand (this was all late 50's early sixties - it took five, sometimes six years to get a plant from ground break to fully licensed and train the local population how to run it - and that's what they did - took high school graduates and directed them out of the trades to become licensed reactor operators, or elections or mechanics - to this day, its how we do it!)

  • @lineshaftrestorations7903
    @lineshaftrestorations7903 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Even if they watched this program some would still believe electric power comes from a wall socket.

  • @iisky1
    @iisky1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    5:17 lemon battery.

  • @markarca6360
    @markarca6360 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    16:09 - AC generators are different from DC generators. DC generators have commutators, while AC generators have slip rings. There is another AC generator design where the coils (Stator) does not rotate, but the magnet (Rotor) does.

    • @xyz-sp9ht
      @xyz-sp9ht ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Like in bicycles?

    • @markarca6360
      @markarca6360 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@xyz-sp9ht Yes. Even in generators used to generate electricity in a large scale like in a hydroelectric power station.

    • @xyz-sp9ht
      @xyz-sp9ht ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@markarca6360 i really thought that ac produces alternating current, while dc does direct current... Hmmmn.. am i wrong?

    • @cleansebob1
      @cleansebob1 ปีที่แล้ว

      The principles involved are *exactly the same*, you m o r o n. Are you just trying to appear smart?

  • @dalecomer5951
    @dalecomer5951 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Is there a narration credit on the film? Have heard that voice many times.

    • @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Dale, didn't see a credit listing for the narrator, but yes, he is very familiar. Will probably be able to figure out who he is by checking other documentaries of that time period. If I get more info, will let you know. ~ Thanks! ~ VK

    • @dalecomer5951
      @dalecomer5951 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ComputerHistoryArchivesProject Thanks.

    • @historymiscellanea2769
      @historymiscellanea2769 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It sounds like Peter Thomas, narrator of Forensic Files, among many other things.

  • @alocin110
    @alocin110 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Electrons are negitively charged and don't colide while circling around the nuclious. And on the other hand, all the positively charged protons are packed in the nucleous. The million dollars questions that have is how these positively charged Protons packed together? where is the repulsive force between them? So the negatively charged electrons repel each oter and maintain their orbits. Can someone give me an explanation as to why all positively charged packed and not repulsing? Thank you.

  • @ewaf88
    @ewaf88 ปีที่แล้ว

    The young man went on to work for Tesla as a senior consultant

  • @rameenmeerann4876
    @rameenmeerann4876 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very interesting, but to know the source of electron flow when copper coil rotates in magnetic field. Thanks

  • @frankroberts9320
    @frankroberts9320 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A warning is needed ahead of this film? We are well and truly screwed.

    • @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject
      @ComputerHistoryArchivesProject  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hi Frank, some viewers listen to our videos with headphones, and loud sounds are sometimes disturbing. We have had a couple of complaints, not many though....

  • @jimmybrad156
    @jimmybrad156 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    11:19 That lady is like 2 foot tall!

  • @nickharrison3748
    @nickharrison3748 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    why do like charges repel?
    also what are electrons made of?

    • @GH-oi2jf
      @GH-oi2jf ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Electrons are fundamental. They are made of anything else, as far as we know. We know how they behave, not why.

    • @cleansebob1
      @cleansebob1 ปีที่แล้ว

      We don't know why.

  • @cetocoquinto4704
    @cetocoquinto4704 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Back in a time when people made right teachings from true experts. Compared to todays so called experts

  • @HsynCkr900
    @HsynCkr900 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I: intensity of current

  • @Johnconno
    @Johnconno ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Electricity. First we cooked an elephant.
    Then we cooked killers.
    Electricity.

  • @apl175
    @apl175 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Why does it always seem like we're taught electricity "flows" from positive, through a device, and returns to the negative --- when from an electron perspective, the opposite is the case?
    EDIT/ANSWER: Because the movement of electrons is DIFFERENT from the actual electrical current. It's the movement of electrons from negative to positive, that causes (induces) current to flow from positive to negative. (very simplified, but I'm told this is the right way to think about it)

    • @eduflyer
      @eduflyer ปีที่แล้ว +6

      because when the convention was created back in the 1800s they didn’t fully understand how atoms and electrons worked. It’s the same for calculations really you would just get the opposite sign.

    • @jamesslick4790
      @jamesslick4790 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I went to school in Pittsburgh, PA suburb in the 60's - '70's. We WERE taught that current flowed from negative to positive as far back as "grade" school. Perhaps being that Pittsburgh was home to Westinghouse, our teachers were "hipper" as to how electricity worked?, Every time I saw "conventional" flow in a diagram It would drive me "nuts"!

    • @shadowshadow2724
      @shadowshadow2724 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jamesslick4790 is electricity actually a movement of electrons ? does this model still works for higher frequency electronics ?
      Or it's an electric field and magnetic field that propagate in the wire ?

    • @GH-oi2jf
      @GH-oi2jf ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@shadowshadow2724 - The electrons do move, although not very far in AC. You wouldn’t have a field to propagate if they didn’t move.

    • @shadowshadow2724
      @shadowshadow2724 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GH-oi2jf so an electron cannot move to another location 4meters away from its original location in copper wire

  • @johnpaulferrer7589
    @johnpaulferrer7589 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sa here

  • @PeterMilanovski
    @PeterMilanovski ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So basically the more I have, the less I am! And the less I have, the more I am!
    Sounds counterintuitive to me, if only banks worked this way, I could possibly be the wealthiest person on the planet!
    Notice when the description is given of the battery, both terminals of the battery are negative! But since one is more negative than the other, it's called positive even though there's no positive charge!
    I have been saying this for a very long time, there is no negative or positive charge! There's only charge and therefore since there are a lot of different molecules that make up all the elements in the periodic table, there can only be different states of charge! One molecule can be positive in relation to one other molecule and also be negative in relation to another totally different molecule.... So this basically means that an atom doesn't have two different opposite charges plus the neutron which has no charge but instead, the neutron which is supposed to be neutral, carries a charge at the midpoint between the electrons and protons..... Assuming that those particules actually exist as they have never been seen to date!!!
    This is exactly what Benjamin Franklin said about the electric charge, so whoever messed up and misunderstood what Franklin said has messed up everything and everyone else and it's 2022 and the clues are everywhere but no one is noticing....
    And then you take a look at quantum mechanics and see opposite charges everywhere for every particule and you just know that when they realise that their core theory which is based on the atom is incorrect and thus all their quantum theories are also incorrect, they are going to fall over LoL 🤣...
    This is the reason why it's extremely important to be able to see what it is that you are trying to explain, otherwise you are just wasting your time if you can't show me what you are talking about....

    • @simpleman283
      @simpleman283 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Instead of wanting to be wealthy, be content w/food & clothing.

    • @PeterMilanovski
      @PeterMilanovski ปีที่แล้ว

      @@simpleman283 that's all you are allowed to have, any more than that is going to require a fight, they won't let you have it so easy.

    • @simpleman283
      @simpleman283 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@PeterMilanovski I paid sales tax on 2x4s & plywood, I nailed them together with a hammer I also paid sales tax on. Now each year they tell me I owe them money for this thing called property tax.

    • @PeterMilanovski
      @PeterMilanovski ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@simpleman283 I feel and share your pain....
      The other day I put fuel in my car for which I paid for the fuel and paid a fuel excise duty on it and then 10% GST tax on the tax and fuel combined! How the Eff does that work?
      Something tells me that someone somewhere wants me to be positive so they need to keep my account in the negatives as much as possible! All for the privilege of not having to walk to everywhere.... What a wonderful world we live in!

  • @bryancomeaux4961
    @bryancomeaux4961 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    COPPER HAS ELECTRONS A MAGNET PUSHES THE ELECTRON
    THE NEXT ELECTRON UNTIL THE LAST ONER ON THE OTHER END OF THE WIRE PUSHES THE MAGNET ON THE OTHER END TATS BASICALY HOW IT WORKS. SPARKS ARE ELECTROMAGNETIC CHARGE. ROTATING THE ELECTRONS IN AIR UNTIL THEY ARE PALSMA

  • @mphilipsen3077
    @mphilipsen3077 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You forgot to mention that it is all about European inventions.

    • @organicfarm5524
      @organicfarm5524 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tbh, it doesn't need to be mentioned, anyone who is sane enough knows that European inventions are running our advanced modern world;)

    • @anishsharma6702
      @anishsharma6702 ปีที่แล้ว

      what about americans ?

    • @Woffy.
      @Woffy. หลายเดือนก่อน

      Give them a chance America have only existed a few hundred years and yet to discover Europeans.

  • @dracov6664
    @dracov6664 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tu byłem ,Tony Halik 2022.

  • @organicfarm5524
    @organicfarm5524 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can't think of our technologically advanced modern world without Electrical Engineering⚡🔋🔌💡🔦☎📡🎞📻📺📠📸📟💾🖥📱🔬🔭🛰🚋🚎🚘✈️🚁🛳