It need deep review by all law experts, reputed intectuals, and present lokasabha members. by these laws citizens of India should not have colonism effect.
@@Krish-cz7tg Even President has to take oath from SC, so SC powerful than the parliament. Electoral bond was issued after getting the approval of Parliament, however SC has banned the electoral bond and by which you can understand who has more power than the Parliament.
@@AsgarAhamedAli parliament can remove president and parliament can reverse the sc judgement so No parliament is more powerful because it's people of india voice
@@Krish-cz7tg yeah dude but that never costed our liberty and these laws give more power to police who are already corrupt. So how can we expect proper fair justice. We can accept these laws but the problem is proper definition of particular terms like terrorism. It's very vague, it needs to be very particular. Varna sab ke upar tada lag jayega
@@LuciferScreams haa but court ka interpretation pe depends karta hai sb . pehle bde se bda criminal nikl jata tha but ab niklna thoda mushkil ho gya h evidence act check balances kr lga
Lawyers should know the basic rule that, they can not overrule the laws made by parliament. Why were they not participating in discussions when public opinion was saught before bringing in the new laws?
This is not implemented in hurry, the changes coming and review happening was pitches in public meetings and parliament new few times. New laws need to come and amend as the implementation hurdles come
The new laws have been put into operation without following due process of a wider range of debate in parliament, without evoluation by a body of legal luminaries of known loyalty to the constitution and nation, and without evolving a national consensus. The old laws introduced during colonial era have been amended extensively in 1973 and are compatible with Indian conditions. Therefore, there is no need and place for any new laws for the country as such. If at all Goverment felt necessity of a change in the laws, such changes could as well have been done by way of an ammendment. These laws appear to be more arbitrary and state centric than democratic and citizens centric. The new laws are therefore a malicious political exercise and disservice to the nation.
8mths pehle se gov ne bataya new law aayega, AI laao court me, vakil aur judge ki zarurat kam lagegi, badlao thoda mushkil lata hai per baad me faida hota hai.
Corruption blame BJP, ED and CBI accused for ruling party, reform laws also objections. Exam papers leaking blame BJP, but reform laws to punish culprits. Also, blame BJP, hurry to pass reform laws?
Bjp me jantaka bharosa ab bilkul nahi he ye jo kuchh bhi karenge woh sirf logope tanadhahi karne k liye hi karenge .Ye kuchh achha kar hi nahi sakte kyuki dharma aur dweshki rajneeti karte he aur kuchh nahi.
jis din jail jaoge u will thank ipc where u were supposed to be be in jail for 15 days and now with the new rules, it’s 90 days.. so i guess for 90 days they won’t ask u write any eassy
No these laws should not be implemented . There is no reason that they must be implemented right now . They should be discussed Parliament . Opposition should be involved too to take decision.
जब कानून को बदलेगा उस समिति में जज और वकीलों को भी मिलना है। मोदी और शाह मिलकर बदलने से देश का कानून बदलेगा? इस के विरुद्ध पार्लामेंट के अंदर और बाहर प्रोटेस्ट करना चाहिए। 150 एमपीयों को सस्पेंड करके उनके अनुपस्थिति में किया हुआ कानून मान नही सकता है।
![TEEDEE TADA - DIAMOND NARAKORN X LEGO LYKN [Special Dance Performance]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QgtZedFeumA/mqdefault.jpg)
It need deep review by all law experts, reputed intectuals, and present lokasabha members. by these laws citizens of India should not have colonism effect.
It was passed 7 months back! Why these bums did not view their rear? How many more rearview?
Already delayed by 75 years. Is this a hurry for courts ? They want another millioneum?
With this new modification, people will take law in hands and it may raise anarchy
SC to stay this order immediately.
sc is not above parliament.they have there limitations
@@Krish-cz7tgthey can act in laws
@@Krish-cz7tg Even President has to take oath from SC, so
SC powerful than the parliament.
Electoral bond was issued after getting the approval of Parliament, however SC has banned the electoral bond and by which you can understand who has more power than the Parliament.
@@AsgarAhamedAli parliament can remove president and parliament can reverse the sc judgement
so No parliament is more powerful because it's people of india voice
@@AsgarAhamedAli parliament respect sc judgement don't mean they can't change it. parliament is ultimate authority of political decision.
It needs review
nothing is perfect.govt already said that they will review time by time with sc help
@@Krish-cz7tg it need not to be perfect but can't let a law to be implemented which can be openly used for political advantage by any party
@@LuciferScreams political party and business man will always find a loopholes.no matter what ever law you make
@@Krish-cz7tg yeah dude but that never costed our liberty and these laws give more power to police who are already corrupt. So how can we expect proper fair justice. We can accept these laws but the problem is proper definition of particular terms like terrorism. It's very vague, it needs to be very particular. Varna sab ke upar tada lag jayega
@@LuciferScreams haa but court ka interpretation pe depends karta hai sb . pehle bde se bda criminal nikl jata tha but ab niklna thoda mushkil ho gya h evidence act check balances kr lga
Already comitee bani thi
Lok sabha abd rajya sabha mei bahas kei badh hi law laye gye hai 😊😊
Up very very thanks
11 नवंबर 2024 से 13 मई 2025 तक भारतीय न्यायप्रणाली के इतिहास में एक काला कार्यकाल साबित होगा
Why?
After holding proper discussions.
20 - 30 साल केस को खींचना असंभव होगा और हर adjournment का collection कम हो जायेगा.....
Lawyers should know the basic rule that, they can not overrule the laws made by parliament. Why were they not participating in discussions when public opinion was saught before bringing in the new laws?
It's to late the laws must implement.today itself.those are opposing these laws what held them to came out and discuss law minister in earlier.
Why Govt., is in hurry, do we and Supreme Court will ever get an answer thats acceptable for majority of the people
This is not implemented in hurry, the changes coming and review happening was pitches in public meetings and parliament new few times. New laws need to come and amend as the implementation hurdles come
देश के जनता को बताना चाहिए क़ी ये तीन क़ानून से लोगों को क्या फायदा हैं उसके बाद ही लागु करना चाहिए ताकि आम जनता इसे अच्छी तरह से समझ सके
The new laws have been put into operation without following due process of a wider range of debate in parliament, without evoluation by a body of legal luminaries of known loyalty to the constitution and nation, and without evolving a national consensus.
The old laws introduced during colonial era have been amended extensively in 1973 and are compatible with Indian conditions.
Therefore, there is no need and place for any new laws for the country as such.
If at all Goverment felt necessity of a change in the laws, such changes could as well have been done by way of an ammendment. These laws appear to be more arbitrary and state centric than democratic and citizens centric. The new laws are therefore a malicious political exercise and disservice to the nation.
Modi Saha lobby ko deeply samajhna chahiye
Pro government lawyers, judges, NGOs, Politicians should file cases against black day protesting lawyers and judges under new laws
8mths pehle se gov ne bataya new law aayega, AI laao court me, vakil aur judge ki zarurat kam lagegi, badlao thoda mushkil lata hai per baad me faida hota hai.
These Kanoon laws should be applied to Modi and Amit Shah
Corruption blame BJP, ED and CBI accused for ruling party, reform laws also objections. Exam papers leaking blame BJP, but reform laws to punish culprits. Also, blame BJP, hurry to pass reform laws?
Ye law minister kuchh samjhte he kya.
ye privilege ko enjoy kar rahe he
Anti reform 😇
Bjp me jantaka bharosa ab bilkul nahi he ye jo kuchh bhi karenge woh sirf logope tanadhahi karne k liye hi karenge .Ye kuchh achha kar hi nahi sakte kyuki dharma aur dweshki rajneeti karte he aur kuchh nahi.
Passed by parliament. Implement it. They ask why hurry. I ask why delay?
You ask why delay , answer is health of constitutional democracy. It could even raise to anarchy, if it's good why fear for review
Who are you
A joker
jis din jail jaoge u will thank ipc where u were supposed to be be in jail for 15 days and now with the new rules, it’s 90 days.. so i guess for 90 days they won’t ask u write any eassy
stsy
No these laws should not be implemented . There is no reason that they must be implemented right now . They should be discussed Parliament . Opposition should be involved too to take decision.
Anti Reform and speedy Justice. Sticking to colonialism is anti Hindu and anti India.
Losing our history rather shaping it for the future is very sad indeed
जब कानून को बदलेगा उस समिति में जज और वकीलों को भी मिलना है। मोदी और शाह मिलकर बदलने से देश का कानून बदलेगा? इस के विरुद्ध पार्लामेंट के अंदर और बाहर प्रोटेस्ट करना चाहिए।
150 एमपीयों को सस्पेंड करके उनके अनुपस्थिति में किया हुआ कानून मान नही सकता है।
Ye 3 law Amit Shah ke Dimaag ki Khtarnaak Scheme hai...