Mercedes AMG GT 43 4-Door 2022 POV Drive | soundcheck |

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @evelynhermann1871
    @evelynhermann1871 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    love that car!! 🔥

  • @wass6143
    @wass6143 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    this car its just show and no go

  • @lukastruger
    @lukastruger ปีที่แล้ว +2

    kenne die Straßen;)

  • @20padre20
    @20padre20 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    UFO !

  • @DanielSadjadian
    @DanielSadjadian ปีที่แล้ว +6

    It sound better than I thought, but if you can afford this, you can surely afford the V8 and the GT63S sounds so much nicer.

    • @zhongyaoma0054
      @zhongyaoma0054 ปีที่แล้ว

      why dont you think if they could afford the 63 why would they afford the 43

    • @lizlana4200
      @lizlana4200 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Not a chance, the gt63s is 60k+ more

    • @adrian5640
      @adrian5640 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@lizlana4200 cost of maintaining 63 vs 43 are 300% higher

    • @lizlana4200
      @lizlana4200 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@adrian5640 That's super true, the twin turbo inline 6, with down pipes, tune, e85, intakes, exhaust delete, intercooler and even meth will give you over 500hp on a 4 wheel drive will emulate a 600hp easy off the line. Don't need more power than that. The 63 is just way too much

    • @AdamMalysz007
      @AdamMalysz007 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don’t think that’s always true. In my case yes I could afford both models BUT I don’t want to spend to much on a car. My current car costs about 50k. I can add 50k and get a 43 which is reasonable as that’s like a quater of my yearly income and I already feel bad for spending that much but it’s justifiable considering how stunning it looks. If I were to get a 63 I would need to add 110k as it costs about 160k which is more than half of my income which is just wrong and the only difference would be that the engine is a beast. I drove both and yes 63 is a monster but 43 is way more than enough for a daily car.

  • @tofugodx5945
    @tofugodx5945 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awful car my infiniti m37s from 2012 is way faster 100k for this is a scam

    • @fastcarsgermany6365
      @fastcarsgermany6365  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I think most buyers don't care. They are looking for a sporty car with a lot of luxury and quality and the amg gt is a good choice. If you want better acceleration, there's the amg gt 63s.

  • @Ersy90
    @Ersy90 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Horrible car, 100k Euro, 2tons, sound?, nearly 5sec to 100 (even my rs3 is way quicker) and the insurrance on this car is like 2 tanks and a jetfighter. You could get a flat 6 Porsche for this price.

    • @fastcarsgermany6365
      @fastcarsgermany6365  ปีที่แล้ว +7

      you can't compare the amg gt 43 to a porsche or rs3. if you want to compare something with the rs3 then a45s even if it is a 4 cylinder. and with a porsche you can rather compare the amg gt 63s 2door that takes you from 0-100 in 3 seconds as well.

    • @Ersy90
      @Ersy90 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@fastcarsgermany6365 Comparing money, thats the only thing that matters in this world.

    • @myownname5
      @myownname5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I dont understand why you compare this car to a flat 6 Porsche or rs3. This is a rival to a Panamera v6, which is prised the same. Most people who can afford a car like this can also afford the insurance. Crazy to think about, right?

    • @marcoocram815
      @marcoocram815 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes this 43 in the GT really pulls no sausage from the plate, i think a old 205 c43 makes more fun. It’s a true showcar for posing but nothing else 😂