I really enjoy your channel. I took one archaeology class in college, the only one offered there. So much has changed since then, and so much more discovered. Thank you for all your posts.
You have no idea how many times I had to click "don't recommend this channel" on the TH-cam homepage for TH-cam to finally recommend this video. Finally, something that different, that I also want to see, and relates to what I study.
Whoa! Dude. 3.30 minutes in, you've got a chart up. 1. Talks of Multiregional theory and 2. Says that currently no evidence of European Apes fossils predate fossils found in Africa. Well, we just found that evidence in Anatolia - Anadoluvius. You are going to have to do an updated video.
_"Do Europeans have separate origins?"_ No. All of today's Homo sapiens (whereever in the world they may live) came from the early Homo sapiens that lived in Africa 200K - 300K years ago. The question which of the Late Miocene apes was in the direct lineage eventually leading up to Homo sapiens is a completely different one and might never be answered. We are talking about totally different timeframes here.
OMG. Just visited your channel page where you write the following: _"Paleoanthropology from the right. We provide facts, stats, citations, and links. No pseudo-scientific garbage to push a leftist narrative."_ LOL. There is no left-wing or right-wing narrative in Paleoanthropology. There is only scientific evidence. It is really funny that you claim to be knowledgeable in Paleoanthropology but then suggest that Anadoluvius found in Anatolia could somehow be evidence of a different origin of Europeans. So in effect you claim that the African Homo sapiens had one Miocene ape species in their lineage whatever that species was. And then we had the European Homo sapiens that had a totally different Miocene ape species from Turkey in its lineage. That assumption is stupid beyond belief unless you have some compelling evidence leading from Anadoluvius 9 million ago directly to European Homo sapiens, say, 60,000 years ago. Do you have that? My guess is No. Otherwise it looks to me that you are just a little r...st POS who wants to push his agenda but hasn't really a single clue about Anthropology.
OMG. Just visited your channel page where you write the following: _"Paleoanthropology from the right. We provide facts, stats, citations, and links. No pseudo-scientific garbage to push a leftist narrative."_ LOL. There is no left-wing or right-wing narrative in Paleoanthropology. There is only scientific evidence. It is really funny that you claim to be knowledgeable in Paleoanthropology but then suggest that Anadoluvius found in Anatolia could somehow be evidence of a different origin of Europeans. So in effect you claim that the African Homo sapiens had one Miocene ape species in their lineage whatever that species was. And then we had the European Homo sapiens that had a totally different Miocene ape species from Turkey in its lineage. That assumption is dorky beyond belief unless you have some compelling evidence leading from Anadoluvius 9 million ago directly to European Homo sapiens, say, 60,000 years ago. Do you have that? I guess, no. Otherwise it looks to me that you just wants to push your own agenda (and we know what it is) without really having a single clue about Anthropology.
@@7inrain That is incorrect on multiple levels. Firstly, how does one define "Homo sapiens"? You are using a relatively new definition. For decades, "Homo sapien" was defined as reaching a threshold in brain size and capacity, as well as a suite of other traits and characteristics, including lithics usage and production. By those standards virtually all Africans today could not be described as Homo sapiens, certainly not the Baka, Twi and other Afro-Pygmies.
@@7inrain The main point of this channel is to recognize unique and SEPARATE origins for Eurasians from the Africans. Your citation of 200k - 300k on the African continent has already being disproven by Apidima 1 and other evidence suggesting Homo sapiens were already on the Eurasian continent. And if you'll note halfway in the video I cite the one paper from Madam Bohme that says 3.5mya. And Dmanisi at 1.9mya. And recent China lithics at 2.2mya. There's your continuity from the late Miocene Apes.
![[Live] : ONE FIGHT NIGHT 28 วันนี้!! "พระจันทร์ฉาย vs เอลลิส"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LfImEQqfARc/mqdefault.jpg)
I really enjoy your channel. I took one archaeology class in college, the only one offered there. So much has changed since then, and so much more discovered. Thank you for all your posts.
Thank you for watching :)
You have no idea how many times I had to click "don't recommend this channel" on the TH-cam homepage for TH-cam to finally recommend this video. Finally, something that different, that I also want to see, and relates to what I study.
Whoa! Dude. 3.30 minutes in, you've got a chart up. 1. Talks of Multiregional theory and 2. Says that currently no evidence of European Apes fossils predate fossils found in Africa. Well, we just found that evidence in Anatolia - Anadoluvius. You are going to have to do an updated video.
Because you said so? I doubt it.
What do you think now that they found the bones of a Miocene Ape in Anatolia? Do Europeans have separate origins?
_"Do Europeans have separate origins?"_
No. All of today's Homo sapiens (whereever in the world they may live) came from the early Homo sapiens that lived in Africa 200K - 300K years ago.
The question which of the Late Miocene apes was in the direct lineage eventually leading up to Homo sapiens is a completely different one and might never be answered. We are talking about totally different timeframes here.
OMG. Just visited your channel page where you write the following:
_"Paleoanthropology from the right. We provide facts, stats, citations, and links. No pseudo-scientific garbage to push a leftist narrative."_
LOL. There is no left-wing or right-wing narrative in Paleoanthropology. There is only scientific evidence.
It is really funny that you claim to be knowledgeable in Paleoanthropology but then suggest that Anadoluvius found in Anatolia could somehow be evidence of a different origin of Europeans. So in effect you claim that the African Homo sapiens had one Miocene ape species in their lineage whatever that species was. And then we had the European Homo sapiens that had a totally different Miocene ape species from Turkey in its lineage.
That assumption is stupid beyond belief unless you have some compelling evidence leading from Anadoluvius 9 million ago directly to European Homo sapiens, say, 60,000 years ago. Do you have that? My guess is No.
Otherwise it looks to me that you are just a little r...st POS who wants to push his agenda but hasn't really a single clue about Anthropology.
OMG. Just visited your channel page where you write the following:
_"Paleoanthropology from the right. We provide facts, stats, citations, and links. No pseudo-scientific garbage to push a leftist narrative."_
LOL. There is no left-wing or right-wing narrative in Paleoanthropology. There is only scientific evidence.
It is really funny that you claim to be knowledgeable in Paleoanthropology but then suggest that Anadoluvius found in Anatolia could somehow be evidence of a different origin of Europeans. So in effect you claim that the African Homo sapiens had one Miocene ape species in their lineage whatever that species was. And then we had the European Homo sapiens that had a totally different Miocene ape species from Turkey in its lineage.
That assumption is dorky beyond belief unless you have some compelling evidence leading from Anadoluvius 9 million ago directly to European Homo sapiens, say, 60,000 years ago. Do you have that? I guess, no.
Otherwise it looks to me that you just wants to push your own agenda (and we know what it is) without really having a single clue about Anthropology.
@@7inrain That is incorrect on multiple levels. Firstly, how does one define "Homo sapiens"? You are using a relatively new definition. For decades, "Homo sapien" was defined as reaching a threshold in brain size and capacity, as well as a suite of other traits and characteristics, including lithics usage and production. By those standards virtually all Africans today could not be described as Homo sapiens, certainly not the Baka, Twi and other Afro-Pygmies.
@@7inrain The main point of this channel is to recognize unique and SEPARATE origins for Eurasians from the Africans. Your citation of 200k - 300k on the African continent has already being disproven by Apidima 1 and other evidence suggesting Homo sapiens were already on the Eurasian continent. And if you'll note halfway in the video I cite the one paper from Madam Bohme that says 3.5mya. And Dmanisi at 1.9mya. And recent China lithics at 2.2mya. There's your continuity from the late Miocene Apes.