I am cancer biologist, but loves Arvin videos. If he was my teacher, I could have been quantum physicist. Amazing videos with great explanations, can’t wait till next video. Thanks for such amazing contribution!
For what it's worth I'm glad that you're a cancer biologist. Not that there's anything wrong with being a quantum physicist, but at this point in time it certainly looks like the world is more in direct need of cancer biologists....
@@andersjjensen Probably the most valuable field to humans in present day are Advanced General Intelligence programmers. I would not be surprised if an AGI gets created and massively advances cancer treatment far beyond what biologists manage to in the next few decades. Equally important are AGI safety researchers & philosophers, because if they get it wrong then AGI will almost certainly cause human extinction.
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. Certainty is dual to uncertainty -- the Heisenberg certainty/uncertainty principle. Stability is dual to instability -- optimized control theory. Quantum stars or Black holes do not collapse in on themselves because of the Pauli exclusion principle or Fermions (particles) cannot occupy exactly the same state state. Duality is the origin of the Pauli exclusion principle! Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality). Spin statistics theorem:- Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality. Bosons are dual to Fermions. "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind" -- Einstein. Science is dual to religion -- the mind duality of Albert Einstein. Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual. Apples fall to the the ground because they are conserving duality. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Duality creates reality.
Best school ever, thanks for inspiring me to start learning quantum physics and science in general, thanks to this channel and the internet my life took turn and from a mainstream person I began to search more and more, many things including installing solar panels to get my electricity, making circuits, making ethanol from sugar and even fruits began here, thanks for the great content quantum physics is very interesting and fundamental I hope we learn more about it, but as we learn more I only have more questions haha
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. Certainty is dual to uncertainty -- the Heisenberg certainty/uncertainty principle. Stability is dual to instability -- optimized control theory. Quantum stars or Black holes do not collapse in on themselves because of the Pauli exclusion principle or Fermions (particles) cannot occupy exactly the same state state. Duality is the origin of the Pauli exclusion principle! Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality). Spin statistics theorem:- Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality. Bosons are dual to Fermions. "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind" -- Einstein. Science is dual to religion -- the mind duality of Albert Einstein. Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual. Apples fall to the the ground because they are conserving duality. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Duality creates reality.
Arvin, you pointed out a very important fact-in the Sun's nuclear reaction, only 0.7% of the mass gets converted to energy. In fact, one of your viewers asked why not a 100%. I explained the law of conservation of baryon number as well as I could. But I'm sure a video from you would be worth a 1000 times as much. Yup, that's a request-a video on the lesser-known conservation laws such as charge, parity, baryon number, lepton number etc. I have another reason for requesting this. Some enthusiastic but misguided proponents of nuclear fusion forget this 0.7% limit. They tell you how much energy _E_ we humans consume, how much fossil fuel we burn for that energy, and how much pollution we cause because of it. Then they use Einstein's famous _E = mc²_ and arrive at a ridiculously small amount _m = E/c²_ of uranium, plutonium, or some other nuclear fuel that could replace all those gigatons of fossil fuels. A lot of naïve people get convinced by such false arguments. But, as you mentioned in this video, they are off by a factor of more than 140. But you did not explain why. In order to have a rational and fact-based discussion on such topics, it would be nice to have the science explained in a simple and clear fashion, as you do in your other videos.
The reason only a small amount of mass gets converted into energy, is because our Sun is too large to have convection currents. Red dwarfs don't have this limitation, due to reduced gravity and convert almost all hydrogen.
@@lordgarion514 No, that's not it. The only way to convert all of hydrogen into pure energy is to get an equal quantity of anti-hydrogen to annihilate each other. On the other hand, if you have only matter to begin with-no antimatter-you won't be able to convert it all to pure energy. Doesn't matter what kind of reaction it is-chemical, biological, nuclear fission, nuclear fusion. Doesn't matter where it takes place-in a lab on Earth, in the Sun or some other star, white dwarf, red dwarf, neutron star, supernova, quasar ... some matter will always remain behind as matter, without getting converted to energy.
If I understand correctly, it's 0.7% of the mass involved with the actual successful reactions occurring at the core. There is a lot hydrogen just sitting around in a hot bath of plasma heated by the energy coming from the core before it heads towards the planets. Not all hydrogen "collisions" at the core will fuse to helium at any moment, but nothing is stopping it from happening in future moment. I'm then curious what percentage of the core is actually fusing over a period of time...let's just say 1 second.
Can you please make a video on what if we could see in a every wave length? I mean including the X-ray and uv waves. All the possible waves of electromagnetic fields
*Avez-vous lu le livre Jésus a Échoué et s'est Terminé en Catastrophe? Très bon. Pour ceux qui veulent approfondir la LOA et éliminer les croyances limitantes que je conseille, cela élargira considérablement votre esprit.*
Did I tell you I met Hans Bethe? It is said that after he put the Nobel prizing winning paper in the mail, he was on a date, and his date said, "Aren't the stars beautiful?".... ...he said, "Yes, and I am the only man in the world who knows how they work." (We were not "Bros", so I was in no position to check the veracity of this legend).
*Avez-vous lu le livre Jésus a Échoué et s'est Terminé en Catastrophe? Très bon. Pour ceux qui veulent approfondir la LOA et éliminer les croyances limitantes que je conseille, cela élargira considérablement votre esprit.*
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. Certainty is dual to uncertainty -- the Heisenberg certainty/uncertainty principle. Stability is dual to instability -- optimized control theory. Quantum stars or Black holes do not collapse in on themselves because of the Pauli exclusion principle or Fermions (particles) cannot occupy exactly the same state state. Duality is the origin of the Pauli exclusion principle! Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality). Spin statistics theorem:- Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality. Bosons are dual to Fermions. "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind" -- Einstein. Science is dual to religion -- the mind duality of Albert Einstein. Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual. Apples fall to the the ground because they are conserving duality. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Duality creates reality.
@TH-cam official c^2 = 1 in Einstein's theory of General Relativity. Dark energy = repulsive gravity or negative curvature, hyperbolic space. Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry. Real black holes rotate or spin close to the speed of light, when a large star collapses its angular velocity must increase to conserve angular momentum, think of a spinning ballet dancer who brings in her arms to her sides. Dark matter is empirical proof that black holes are spinning close to the speed of light -- relativistic effects. You must add the energy due to rotation and angular momentum to the rest mass of the black hole and this amplifies or increases the net mass of the black hole -- this is completely consistent with General Relativity. Black holes therefore contain a lot more energy/mass than is currently accepted because of rotation and hence the gravitational force is a lot stronger (dark matter). "Perpendicularity in hyperbolic geometry is measured in terms of duality" -- Professor Norman Wildberger, universal hyperbolic geometry. The relationship between dark energy and dark matter is dual. The big bang is a Janus hole/point (two faces = duality) -- Julian Barbour, physicist. Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero. Divergence (the big bang, white hole) is dual to convergence (black holes). Attraction (gravity) is dual to repulsion (anti-gravity, dark energy). Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic.
"When wood burns it releases about 1 ten-millionth of a trillionth of a watt per atom." should be "When wood burns it releases about 1 ten-millionth of a trillionth of a JOULE per atom."
It's pleasing to see quantum explanations. Quantum physics has been hidden away for decades. Explanations without quantum components have always seemed incomplete, and harder to understand. Hooray for the Standard Model, incomplete as she may be.
I would like to say, thank you Arvin. I am a very recent subscriber to your content but have learned so much from you already. The first video I watched of yours was the "How nuclear fission works" and because of how you deliver the facts and theories, made re watching and absorbing the info very easy. Keep up the great work and I hope you and your channel get the recognition it deserves.
@@MrEkzotic The C is there because energy travels at the speed of light. And if you compare it kinetic energy (1/2MV^2), it is the same concept. The kinetic energy in proportional to square of speed.
*Avez-vous lu le livre Jésus a Échoué et s'est Terminé en Catastrophe? Très bon. Pour ceux qui veulent approfondir la LOA et éliminer les croyances limitantes que je conseille, cela élargira considérablement votre esprit.*
Delivering such detailed explanation of complex topics in a way that is not much scientific and difficult to understand is a tough job indeed. Thanks to Arvin who makes it look so easy and helps us in understanding this universe and science beautifully. Thankful to this channel and Arvin. Love from India.
Thank you so much sir I am from India I hav the same concepts in the nuclei chapter of my grade 12 The visuals and explanations made it more clear Once again Thank you sir!!
I think it was one of your past videos that finally helped me grasp some difficult ideas in physics. This video also has helped me further understand energy related to the strong force
Best explanation I have seen on how the Sun shines. One tiny nit: Ra, the Egyptian god, is generally pronounced, not as Ray, but as Rah (the 'a' like in 'father').
In English it is. But in Coptic, which is the leftover of the ancient language of Egypt, it is pronounced, "RAY." I consider this the "correct" pronunciation.
Best video I have found explaining quantum tunneling the nucleons. It doesn't offend my intelligence by presumptions that I wouldn't understand it. Most channels talks to us as if a 6 years old or the masses would ever be interested in learning this. Thank you very much!!
I've been watching his video for more than a year now and he doesn't let me down. Even the topic is too complicated the explanation is too easy to understand, he got some real skills. I love this channel, I'm not a smart guy just enjoying to learn things.
Something about the way Arvin says "The answers... are coming up... right now!" always makes me feel good. You da man Arv, never stop making dope content that makes our brains big
understanding complex subjects of physics is necessary and not easy. Your videos are didactically clear and well explained! Your efforts in preparing your videos deserve gratitude and recognition !! Thank you so much. I subscribe, like and share. See you on other videos. Good luck.
This is by far the best channel I've subscribed in. I'll definitely support it and try to make as many questions I possibly can!!! Thanks so much for enlighten my curiosity and show and explain so many facts, wich, most of the times, I was wrong about them. Thanks so much, thanks a lot for teaching so complicated science in such an easy way. Thanks
I am sad that this type of channel are getting only minimum veiws all are interested in comedy channel and all Now a day there are not brilliant scientists because they are only studying not use imagination but this type of channel give us information about everything that we can't get in our whole life thank you sir teaching us
I wonder if when making a kugelblitz, could the light be angled in a way where it forms a ring of light bounded by its own gravity. If so, what would happen if light was added so the peaks cancelled out, would that space still have gravity.
Ive been wondering this as well. Or if its possible to shine light at a certain angle within the ergosphere of spinning black hole, and have that light bend around and come back out, towards where it was cast, but with a higher energy output. Essentially stealing energy from the black hole.
So basically you want to make a Kerr Metric black hole via Kugelblitz? As for whether the space would still have gravity the answer is yes as gravity comes from the energy density in a volume of space not just its rest mass. Once the black hole is formed the content of the space within the black hole becomes meaningless you need to think of black holes not as a physical object but as a scar in spacetime. Hawking radiation then is the effect of this scar distorting the quantum fields which drives the resulting scar to "heal". The question of what happens to matter that falls in is thus far unanswerable with a number of hypothesized solutions In fact as he pointed out here most of a nucleon's mass is bound up in the energy of the quantum field interactions and photons i.e. quanta of light are the mediating bosons of Quantum Electro Dynamics(QED). All this is to say that once the black hole is made anything on the inside is unknown causally disconnected.
@@brianpj5860 The short answer to your question is yes Have you looked into David Kipping's Halo drive proposal? It describes how this could be done with astrophysical black holes using them to both accelerate and decelerate spacecraft at high speeds. There are two forms of energy accessible from this the rotational angular momentum of the black hole locked within its ergosphere and the orbital angular momentum between two or more co orbiting black hole binaries. The 3 main limitations are the complexity of calculations needed to know where to aim the ability to aim with the necessary precision and of course access to an astrophysical black hole. Kugelblitz black holes would likely be far too small and short lived to be able to fill this role unless you say fed them entire stars worth of mass/energy.
Excellent video although I think it worth mentioning that the shown fusion process (called p-p chain) is not the only way how the sun produce energy (pep, hep, pp2, pp3) even though that is the dominant way. And there are other ways like CNO cycle in other stars. And one more nitpick 12:47 shows the flux tubes in a sligtly misinterpereted way (should be pulled together via gluon interactions).
Yes, I agree on the first issue. The second one, the pulling and pushing are just representations. You can visualize it in a number of ways. One study shows that the tubes look similar to the way we showed it. The only difference is that the plasma would fill all the space between the quarks. But I agree, the conventional picture that was taught in college was different. The science of how this would actually look is not settled.
@@samuelthecamel I was wondering whether "TH-cam sometimes unsubscribes you" was true or a marketing trick used by some youtubers. Looks like it's true.
*Avez-vous lu le livre Jésus a Échoué et s'est Terminé en Catastrophe? Très bon. Pour ceux qui veulent approfondir la LOA et éliminer les croyances limitantes que je conseille, cela élargira considérablement votre esprit.*
A nucleus, like other physical systems, tends towards a state of lowest energy. A neutron will decay into a proton (plus an electron and electron antineutrino) if the nucleus with the proton has a lower energy state than the original. In stable nuclei the possible lower energy states are all filled, i.e. they are each occupied by two protons with spin up and spin down, so beta decay does not occur. A free neutron, outside of a nucleus, is actually unstable, with a half-life of about 10 minutes and 10 seconds.
LIKE CHARGES CAN ATTRACT EACH OTHER WHEN A MAGNETIC FIELD IS A CERTAIN WAY: Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a. My Current TOE: THE SETUP: 1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism. 2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.). 3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them. 4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them. 5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them. FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO: 6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field. 7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field. 8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality. 9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons. 10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary. 11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks. 12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do. THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA: 13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc. 14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe. 15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe. 16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate. 17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure. 18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons). THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY: 19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up. 20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency. 21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies. NOTES: 22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well. 25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true. 26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught? DISCLAIMER: 27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way. a. Imagine a 12 hour clock. b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions. c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions. (The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.) d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields. e. Do this with the em fields on and off. (The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.) f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects. (Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.) (And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it. In addition, it's possible a neutrino might be formed before the black hole stage, the neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.) (An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.) 'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done. 'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
So epic! Totally mind blowing how the weight difference between hydrogen and helium creates all of the known energy from the sun. Would it be fair to say then that the difference is a fine tuned parameter?
It's like getting to a knowledge which a non professional could have never imagined to get despite having a deep interest It's all new level of information for me and I'm sure for lots of others too.
Some scientist say that the stuff that makes up the stuff in the universe, is mostly of space, or mass less and its the energy that holds it and structure of it together. It is of quantum physics and how it moves and keeps it self in place, the pattern is what makes it what it is overall in the larger scale. from tiniest to the largest things in the universe they all follow similar laws and of quantum physics too, the forces that keep something going and staying together in form, in which is essentially varying energies, or movements at work, it is most neat and fantastic part, in which makes up everything. Also if higgs field is real and how things gain mass, or loose mass, on how they interact with the higgs field and how they say the higgs field is what makes up matter is also neat, this could explain things in quantum physic's and how things gain negative and positive dynamic's.
I Learned many things & phenomenond in quantum mechanics from YT channels like yours. But I really lack the foundation and I don't have any idea about equations in it like the one presented at @7:32 . Will you suggest me some free resources where I can learn them? PS: your videos are outstanding 👏
I've been following Arvin's videos for a long time. He gives a lot of information on a certain topic in a very nice way. I watch each of his new videos with pleasure. Greetings from Serbia!
“And that’s coming up. Right now!” A predictable phrase I look forward to every time I watch you video. I generally understand that the difference between the weight of one helium atom and four hydrogen atoms was the source of sun’s energy. But no where have I come across such a comprehensive explanation. Thank you! At the end, you say that the Sun will collapse into a white dwarf. My understanding is that for collapse to occur, the star should have at least 1.49 solar masses, which is the ChandraShekar Limit. Therefore, Sun would expand into a red giant stretching upto Mars, much like Betelgeuse. I would be grateful if you can comment on this doubt.
THANK. YOU. I have been searching for 2 weeks exactly *why* nuclear fusion generates energy beyond the simple mass-energy explanation most videos end with. When you went deeper in the explanation I shouted "YES" out loud to the point where I got weird stares HAHSHAHA- thank you!!!
8:00 I think you should have shown the waveform of the particle when it tunnels through the barrier. Firstly it makes it more clear how a particle is able to tunnel, secondly since it actually is a waveform process that allows the particle to tunnel it's also a more correct explanation of the actually physics.
Yes, that would be a more precise way to describe it, but in order to do that I would have to spend at least a few more minutes explaining that in more depth. I made an in depth video on tunneling here: th-cam.com/video/YstJxj30hzs/w-d-xo.html
he cant mention that coz he is ashamed of his origin so he try to hide any reference that can revile his origin ,u can see that in his name like its Avinash but he made is Arvin Ash so that its look more like Westman name , most of oversees Indian Dharmic Origin peoples hav a mantel illness call Infirioty Complex , and also u can find it in Modern Day Indian Hindus in India too , i think its came from 600 years of continues Islamic Invasion and 200 years of European Colonializations
@@Tilak-Chatterjee There's no problem in being Indian and scientist at the same time, there were amazing Indian scientists from the time that made amazing work in physics, i don't think Arvin is ashamed of anything about his origins or so.
A great job of taking something dry and complicated and explaining it in a clear and simple way to make it interesting. Suggestion at 6 minutes 41 seconds is to label the X and Y axes on the graph. X-axis being inter-particle distance, and Y-axis being potential energy or force.
Arvin, I have some well pondered questions. I need to understand the engineering of a fabricated versus natural fusion reactor. Here are some questions: 1. If the sun is plasma then the gravity of the sun should confine the highest density plasma at the center. Therefore, are electrons available for appearance in the orbits of P-N or P-P nuclei? Are electrons hanging out ready to appear in a fully functional He Atom? 2. Or do they just quantum tunnel off somewhere? 3. Are protons pushed past the "Columb" barrier or do Neutrons just get close enough to overcome the strong nuclear distance for bonding and then bond as a P-N or do protons get pushed next to each other due to the pressure and force? How much is due to N Beta decay and how much happens as direct P-P compliance? Do N's bump into the P's and bond and some P's bond to some P's in some ratio? You mentioned the Berylium path, is this a minority path or some set percentage?
The stocking cap…. Is that like keeping in heat in an overcooked brain?😂. Your videos and explanations are amazing. Thank you for sharing your amazing knowledge.
Thank you so much, I found you channel only recently and LOVE your indepth explanations. Everytime I think I still have a question about something you said...you follow it up with that exact explanation!
I just discovered this channel and I like it. I think that there is a lot of things in macro and micro universe that people can't understand because our perception is limited by three dimensional space and one dimensional time.
In 2013 I quit pursuing mechanical engineering because I didn’t have any teachers who helped things click for me. I do graphic design now but often miss science. I wish I had teachers who explained and applied topics like this.
Very well done video! My only complaint is about the statement that wood releases 10^-19 Watts per atom when it is burned. I tried doing this calculation and got about 10^-19 Joules per atom. To convert this to Watts, you need to divide by the time it takes for the wood to burn. If you assume the log burns up in 1 hour, then you get an average power of about 10^-24 Watts per atom. I think you should be looking at the energy per atom, not power per atom.
Hi Arvin/viewers Since a proton can beta-decay into a neutron, neutrino and positron, how does it make sense for a neutron decaying into a proton, electron and anti neutrino? Is it because a proton can only beta-decay if it has a lot of kinetic energy, and that energy is enough to create the extra mass needed? Have a great day everyone
When he said: „But we are quantum physicists, so let’s get one step deeper!“ This really brought a smile to my face 🙂
Rather broadened the chest I'd say :)
Yup
Tnhnhhh
heh
Me too
I feel smarter..but if I tried to explain this to anyone else I'd sound pretty dumb. 💀😂😂😂
ME WATCHING: "Huh? Where does all the energy come from?"
ARVIN ASH: "I bet you're wondering where all that energy comes from..."
ME: 👀
It is really a surprisingly detailed video.
Arvin is doing such a good job. I wish he was my teacher.
Haha, he is teaching you thru the video, for freeee
Facts. I love Arvin
I second that, he's amazing.
I love this guy.. Such a wonderful people
Yep this video was absolutely amazing!
the only problem with this channel, is that after watching I want more :)
Its not the channel's its yours
No problem dude
I was infuriated that you had a problem for about 0.128 seconds until I finished reading. Also, you're a G.
@@physics_enthusiast_Soorya lol, what a dicky thing to say
I am cancer biologist, but loves Arvin videos. If he was my teacher, I could have been quantum physicist.
Amazing videos with great explanations, can’t wait till next video.
Thanks for such amazing contribution!
For what it's worth I'm glad that you're a cancer biologist. Not that there's anything wrong with being a quantum physicist, but at this point in time it certainly looks like the world is more in direct need of cancer biologists....
Did you already come up with healing method of cancer? Cutting sugar and glutamine to zero? Or you still look for it? Lol Your welcome...
1
@@andersjjensen Probably the most valuable field to humans in present day are Advanced General Intelligence programmers. I would not be surprised if an AGI gets created and massively advances cancer treatment far beyond what biologists manage to in the next few decades. Equally important are AGI safety researchers & philosophers, because if they get it wrong then AGI will almost certainly cause human extinction.
Can you believe some people think that the earth is flat...??? !!! They are missing a whole world of physics, chemistry and astronomy!
This could easily have been a 10 hour long video without running out of fascinating science, thank you.
And I easily could have sat through all 10 hours without a problem. 👍👍
Arvin does such a great job of explaining things that he might be the world's single greatest source in terms of making the world more intelligent.
Many other channels. My most favorite channel is Kurzgesagt. Go check it out, you won't be disappointed.
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
Certainty is dual to uncertainty -- the Heisenberg certainty/uncertainty principle.
Stability is dual to instability -- optimized control theory.
Quantum stars or Black holes do not collapse in on themselves because of the Pauli exclusion principle or Fermions (particles) cannot occupy exactly the same state state.
Duality is the origin of the Pauli exclusion principle!
Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality).
Spin statistics theorem:- Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
Bosons are dual to Fermions.
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind" -- Einstein.
Science is dual to religion -- the mind duality of Albert Einstein.
Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
Apples fall to the the ground because they are conserving duality.
Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton.
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Duality creates reality.
@@SahilP2648 The BEST artistic animations of real science. Its beautiful.😍 This channel is exceptional animation as well. 👌
Best school ever, thanks for inspiring me to start learning quantum physics and science in general, thanks to this channel and the internet my life took turn and from a mainstream person I began to search more and more, many things including installing solar panels to get my electricity, making circuits, making ethanol from sugar and even fruits began here, thanks for the great content quantum physics is very interesting and fundamental I hope we learn more about it, but as we learn more I only have more questions haha
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
Certainty is dual to uncertainty -- the Heisenberg certainty/uncertainty principle.
Stability is dual to instability -- optimized control theory.
Quantum stars or Black holes do not collapse in on themselves because of the Pauli exclusion principle or Fermions (particles) cannot occupy exactly the same state state.
Duality is the origin of the Pauli exclusion principle!
Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality).
Spin statistics theorem:- Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
Bosons are dual to Fermions.
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind" -- Einstein.
Science is dual to religion -- the mind duality of Albert Einstein.
Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
Apples fall to the the ground because they are conserving duality.
Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton.
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Duality creates reality.
Arvin, you pointed out a very important fact-in the Sun's nuclear reaction, only 0.7% of the mass gets converted to energy.
In fact, one of your viewers asked why not a 100%. I explained the law of conservation of baryon number as well as I could. But I'm sure a video from you would be worth a 1000 times as much. Yup, that's a request-a video on the lesser-known conservation laws such as charge, parity, baryon number, lepton number etc.
I have another reason for requesting this. Some enthusiastic but misguided proponents of nuclear fusion forget this 0.7% limit. They tell you how much energy _E_ we humans consume, how much fossil fuel we burn for that energy, and how much pollution we cause because of it. Then they use Einstein's famous _E = mc²_ and arrive at a ridiculously small amount _m = E/c²_ of uranium, plutonium, or some other nuclear fuel that could replace all those gigatons of fossil fuels. A lot of naïve people get convinced by such false arguments. But, as you mentioned in this video, they are off by a factor of more than 140. But you did not explain why. In order to have a rational and fact-based discussion on such topics, it would be nice to have the science explained in a simple and clear fashion, as you do in your other videos.
The reason only a small amount of mass gets converted into energy, is because our Sun is too large to have convection currents.
Red dwarfs don't have this limitation, due to reduced gravity and convert almost all hydrogen.
@@lordgarion514 No, that's not it. The only way to convert all of hydrogen into pure energy is to get an equal quantity of anti-hydrogen to annihilate each other.
On the other hand, if you have only matter to begin with-no antimatter-you won't be able to convert it all to pure energy. Doesn't matter what kind of reaction it is-chemical, biological, nuclear fission, nuclear fusion. Doesn't matter where it takes place-in a lab on Earth, in the Sun or some other star, white dwarf, red dwarf, neutron star, supernova, quasar ... some matter will always remain behind as matter, without getting converted to energy.
If I understand correctly, it's 0.7% of the mass involved with the actual successful reactions occurring at the core. There is a lot hydrogen just sitting around in a hot bath of plasma heated by the energy coming from the core before it heads towards the planets. Not all hydrogen "collisions" at the core will fuse to helium at any moment, but nothing is stopping it from happening in future moment. I'm then curious what percentage of the core is actually fusing over a period of time...let's just say 1 second.
Can you please make a video on what if we could see in a every wave length? I mean including the X-ray and uv waves. All the possible waves of electromagnetic fields
I can't even imagine what that would look like. You could try borrowing Geordi La Forge's visor. 😬 I know, I'm a dork.
*Avez-vous lu le livre Jésus a Échoué et s'est Terminé en Catastrophe? Très bon. Pour ceux qui veulent approfondir la LOA et éliminer les croyances limitantes que je conseille, cela élargira considérablement votre esprit.*
I don't think we can even imagine or perceive what'll happen then.
Did I tell you I met Hans Bethe? It is said that after he put the Nobel prizing winning paper in the mail, he was on a date, and his date said, "Aren't the stars beautiful?"....
...he said, "Yes, and I am the only man in the world who knows how they work."
(We were not "Bros", so I was in no position to check the veracity of this legend).
Oh nice! He must have been quite an exciting date!
*Avez-vous lu le livre Jésus a Échoué et s'est Terminé en Catastrophe? Très bon. Pour ceux qui veulent approfondir la LOA et éliminer les croyances limitantes que je conseille, cela élargira considérablement votre esprit.*
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
Certainty is dual to uncertainty -- the Heisenberg certainty/uncertainty principle.
Stability is dual to instability -- optimized control theory.
Quantum stars or Black holes do not collapse in on themselves because of the Pauli exclusion principle or Fermions (particles) cannot occupy exactly the same state state.
Duality is the origin of the Pauli exclusion principle!
Gravitation is equivalent or dual to acceleration -- Einstein's happiest thought, the principle of equivalence (duality).
Spin statistics theorem:- Symmetric wave functions (Bosons, waves) are dual to anti-symmetric wave functions (Fermions, particles) -- wave/particle or quantum duality.
Bosons are dual to Fermions.
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind" -- Einstein.
Science is dual to religion -- the mind duality of Albert Einstein.
Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy, gravitational energy is dual.
Apples fall to the the ground because they are conserving duality.
Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton.
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Duality creates reality.
@TH-cam official c^2 = 1 in Einstein's theory of General Relativity.
Dark energy = repulsive gravity or negative curvature, hyperbolic space.
Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry.
Real black holes rotate or spin close to the speed of light, when a large star collapses its angular velocity must increase to conserve angular momentum, think of a spinning ballet dancer who brings in her arms to her sides. Dark matter is empirical proof that black holes are spinning close to the speed of light -- relativistic effects.
You must add the energy due to rotation and angular momentum to the rest mass of the black hole and this amplifies or increases the net mass of the black hole -- this is completely consistent with General Relativity. Black holes therefore contain a lot more energy/mass than is currently accepted because of rotation and hence the gravitational force is a lot stronger (dark matter).
"Perpendicularity in hyperbolic geometry is measured in terms of duality" -- Professor Norman Wildberger, universal hyperbolic geometry.
The relationship between dark energy and dark matter is dual.
The big bang is a Janus hole/point (two faces = duality) -- Julian Barbour, physicist.
Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero.
Divergence (the big bang, white hole) is dual to convergence (black holes).
Attraction (gravity) is dual to repulsion (anti-gravity, dark energy).
Thesis is dual to anti-thesis creates the converging thesis or synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic.
Arvin Ash exudes the energy of happiness + enthusiasm C square
"When wood burns it releases about 1 ten-millionth of a trillionth of a watt per atom."
should be
"When wood burns it releases about 1 ten-millionth of a trillionth of a JOULE per atom."
It's pleasing to see quantum explanations.
Quantum physics has been hidden away for decades.
Explanations without quantum components have always seemed incomplete, and harder to understand.
Hooray for the Standard Model,
incomplete as she may be.
Love the way you teach this material. The flow is engaging and the graphics make the content more easy to understand
I would like to say, thank you Arvin. I am a very recent subscriber to your content but have learned so much from you already. The first video I watched of yours was the "How nuclear fission works" and because of how you deliver the facts and theories, made re watching and absorbing the info very easy. Keep up the great work and I hope you and your channel get the recognition it deserves.
Such an excellent explanation!
Satisfied my thirst for knowledge 😊😊
This video is one of your Best of Arvin Ash videos... Thank you for this great video..
Thank you. Much appreciated. Hope you got something out of it.
@@ArvinAsh oh yeah, definitely :))
@@ArvinAsh I concur, it's one of your best. What I'd really like to know is why the c is squared.
@@MrEkzotic The C is there because energy travels at the speed of light. And if you compare it kinetic energy (1/2MV^2), it is the same concept. The kinetic energy in proportional to square of speed.
*Avez-vous lu le livre Jésus a Échoué et s'est Terminé en Catastrophe? Très bon. Pour ceux qui veulent approfondir la LOA et éliminer les croyances limitantes que je conseille, cela élargira considérablement votre esprit.*
You gave the best explanation that I've ever heard...and then you went two steps deeper!
You always wakes up my curiosity.
Graduated with a general equivalency diploma but this dude makes it easy for everyone to learn physics
Whether all could be understood or not, Arvin style of delivering is so interesting that glued to his hearing till the end.
Delivering such detailed explanation of complex topics in a way that is not much scientific and difficult to understand is a tough job indeed. Thanks to Arvin who makes it look so easy and helps us in understanding this universe and science beautifully. Thankful to this channel and Arvin. Love from India.
"A few more cosmic minutes of basking in the sun," whew! Thanks Arvin.
I love taking notes about your videos Arvin, amazing job!
Thank you so much sir
I am from India
I hav the same concepts in the nuclei chapter of my grade 12
The visuals and explanations made it more clear
Once again Thank you sir!!
I think it was one of your past videos that finally helped me grasp some difficult ideas in physics. This video also has helped me further understand energy related to the strong force
Best explanation I have seen on how the Sun shines.
One tiny nit: Ra, the Egyptian god, is generally pronounced, not as Ray, but as Rah (the 'a' like in 'father').
In English it is. But in Coptic, which is the leftover of the ancient language of Egypt, it is pronounced, "RAY." I consider this the "correct" pronunciation.
Archeologists discovered an ancient "cheer" written on the inside of a tomb.
There's only one God,
He is the Sun God,
Ra, Ra, Ra
Please make a video on the muon g-2 experiment👍🏻
Best video I have found explaining quantum tunneling the nucleons. It doesn't offend my intelligence by presumptions that I wouldn't understand it. Most channels talks to us as if a 6 years old or the masses would ever be interested in learning this. Thank you very much!!
Fantastic writing, well done!
I've been watching his video for more than a year now and he doesn't let me down.
Even the topic is too complicated the explanation is too easy to understand, he got some real skills.
I love this channel, I'm not a smart guy just enjoying to learn things.
Something about the way Arvin says "The answers... are coming up... right now!" always makes me feel good. You da man Arv, never stop making dope content that makes our brains big
I appreciate that.
There is no guy who explains physics in a simple way, thatb helps everyone understand than this one. So awesome
Awesome video, learned a lot! 😁
understanding complex subjects of physics is necessary and not easy. Your videos are didactically clear and well explained! Your efforts in preparing your videos deserve gratitude and recognition !! Thank you so much. I subscribe, like and share. See you on other videos. Good luck.
This is by far the best channel I've subscribed in. I'll definitely support it and try to make as many questions I possibly can!!! Thanks so much for enlighten my curiosity and show and explain so many facts, wich, most of the times, I was wrong about them. Thanks so much, thanks a lot for teaching so complicated science in such an easy way. Thanks
Man just explained in 16 minutes what physicists in the past spent their whole life times trying to explain.... 🤯🤯
Awesome content, thank you 🙏🙏
I am sad that this type of channel are getting only minimum veiws all are interested in comedy channel and all
Now a day there are not brilliant scientists because they are only studying not use imagination but this type of channel give us information about everything that we can't get in our whole life thank you sir teaching us
"minimum views"
Dude has a half-million subscribers. You and I have very different definitions of "minimum."
Arvin's passion for quantum physics is rubbing off on me. His questions keep me captivated.
Now the Gluon G 9 wobble threw a wrench into the standard model...
I worked on that detector at BNL
I loved his statement at 10:45
"We are Quantum-Physicists Darn it!"
I wonder if when making a kugelblitz, could the light be angled in a way where it forms a ring of light bounded by its own gravity.
If so, what would happen if light was added so the peaks cancelled out, would that space still have gravity.
Ive been wondering this as well. Or if its possible to shine light at a certain angle within the ergosphere of spinning black hole, and have that light bend around and come back out, towards where it was cast, but with a higher energy output. Essentially stealing energy from the black hole.
So basically you want to make a Kerr Metric black hole via Kugelblitz? As for whether the space would still have gravity the answer is yes as gravity comes from the energy density in a volume of space not just its rest mass. Once the black hole is formed the content of the space within the black hole becomes meaningless you need to think of black holes not as a physical object but as a scar in spacetime. Hawking radiation then is the effect of this scar distorting the quantum fields which drives the resulting scar to "heal". The question of what happens to matter that falls in is thus far unanswerable with a number of hypothesized solutions
In fact as he pointed out here most of a nucleon's mass is bound up in the energy of the quantum field interactions and photons i.e. quanta of light are the mediating bosons of Quantum Electro Dynamics(QED). All this is to say that once the black hole is made anything on the inside is unknown causally disconnected.
@@brianpj5860 The short answer to your question is yes Have you looked into David Kipping's Halo drive proposal? It describes how this could be done with astrophysical black holes using them to both accelerate and decelerate spacecraft at high speeds. There are two forms of energy accessible from this the rotational angular momentum of the black hole locked within its ergosphere and the orbital angular momentum between two or more co orbiting black hole binaries. The 3 main limitations are the complexity of calculations needed to know where to aim the ability to aim with the necessary precision and of course access to an astrophysical black hole.
Kugelblitz black holes would likely be far too small and short lived to be able to fill this role unless you say fed them entire stars worth of mass/energy.
Basically, in simplest terms, Matter is Super Hyper concentrated form of Enenrgy.
Nice video as usual, I enjoyed it very much. Keep it up!
you have changed my life with your videos... thanks so munch
One of his best videos. Masterpeice!! Keep doing this type of great work. Loved it❤
Excellent video although I think it worth mentioning that the shown fusion process (called p-p chain) is not the only way how the sun produce energy (pep, hep, pp2, pp3) even though that is the dominant way. And there are other ways like CNO cycle in other stars.
And one more nitpick 12:47 shows the flux tubes in a sligtly misinterpereted way (should be pulled together via gluon interactions).
Yes, I agree on the first issue. The second one, the pulling and pushing are just representations. You can visualize it in a number of ways. One study shows that the tubes look similar to the way we showed it. The only difference is that the plasma would fill all the space between the quarks. But I agree, the conventional picture that was taught in college was different. The science of how this would actually look is not settled.
Awesome!
Why the hell did YT unsubscribe me? 😡
That can happen? Yikes
@@samuelthecamel I was wondering whether "TH-cam sometimes unsubscribes you" was true or a marketing trick used by some youtubers. Looks like it's true.
*Avez-vous lu le livre Jésus a Échoué et s'est Terminé en Catastrophe? Très bon. Pour ceux qui veulent approfondir la LOA et éliminer les croyances limitantes que je conseille, cela élargira considérablement votre esprit.*
...things I thought I knew well, but really didn't know it all that in depth at all
What causes the beta decay? I understand that it’s an interaction with the weak force’s W- boson, but why does it occur? Thanks.
A nucleus, like other physical systems, tends towards a state of lowest energy. A neutron will decay into a proton (plus an electron and electron antineutrino) if the nucleus with the proton has a lower energy state than the original. In stable nuclei the possible lower energy states are all filled, i.e. they are each occupied by two protons with spin up and spin down, so beta decay does not occur.
A free neutron, outside of a nucleus, is actually unstable, with a half-life of about 10 minutes and 10 seconds.
@@robinswamidasan the lowest level of energy being the bohr radius? Also thanks a lot for the help :)
LIKE CHARGES CAN ATTRACT EACH OTHER WHEN A MAGNETIC FIELD IS A CERTAIN WAY:
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it. In addition, it's possible a neutrino might be formed before the black hole stage, the neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.)
(An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
So epic! Totally mind blowing how the weight difference between hydrogen and helium creates all of the known energy from the sun. Would it be fair to say then that the difference is a fine tuned parameter?
There are lots of seemingly fine tuned parameters, but this would not be one of them. It could just as well have been 1% or less than 0.7%
@@ArvinAsh thank you!
It's like getting to a knowledge which a non professional could have never imagined to get despite having a deep interest It's all new level of information for me and I'm sure for lots of others too.
I really did not expect to understand everything with as much clarity as I did. Thank you!
Thanks for this!.. your AWESOME!!!!!!! 😎💪👊👊
Some scientist say that the stuff that makes up the stuff in the
universe, is mostly of space, or mass less and its the energy that holds
it and structure of it together. It is of quantum physics and how it
moves and keeps it self in place, the pattern is what makes it what it
is overall in the larger scale. from tiniest to the largest things in
the universe they all follow similar laws and of quantum physics too,
the forces that keep something going and staying together in form, in
which is essentially varying energies, or movements at work, it is most
neat and fantastic part, in which makes up everything. Also if higgs
field is real and how things gain mass, or loose mass, on how they
interact with the higgs field and how they say the higgs field is what
makes up matter is also neat, this could explain things in quantum
physic's and how things gain negative and positive dynamic's.
I Learned many things & phenomenond in quantum mechanics from YT channels like yours. But I really lack the foundation and I don't have any idea about equations in it like the one presented at @7:32 . Will you suggest me some free resources where I can learn them?
PS: your videos are outstanding 👏
Free sources would be Feynman lectures. David Tong's lecture notes are also quite good.
THANK YOU Almost every video i saw about fusion doesnt even mention the tunnel effect. All they say is heat and pressure....
Please keep this intro music in all your videos!
I've been following Arvin's videos for a long time. He gives a lot of information on a certain topic in a very nice way. I watch each of his new videos with pleasure.
Greetings from Serbia!
As usual 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Most underatted channel on youtube. Deserves M+ subscribers....
“And that’s coming up. Right now!” A predictable phrase I look forward to every time I watch you video.
I generally understand that the difference between the weight of one helium atom and four hydrogen atoms was the source of sun’s energy. But no where have I come across such a comprehensive explanation. Thank you!
At the end, you say that the Sun will collapse into a white dwarf. My understanding is that for collapse to occur, the star should have at least 1.49 solar masses, which is the ChandraShekar Limit. Therefore, Sun would expand into a red giant stretching upto Mars, much like Betelgeuse.
I would be grateful if you can comment on this doubt.
Sure, much the sun's mass will expand and will eventually blow away, but a central core will be left behind. This central core is a white dwarf.
@@ArvinAsh so could we safely say that red giants are an eventual white dwarfs?
THANK. YOU. I have been searching for 2 weeks exactly *why* nuclear fusion generates energy beyond the simple mass-energy explanation most videos end with. When you went deeper in the explanation I shouted "YES" out loud to the point where I got weird stares HAHSHAHA- thank you!!!
If you were my teacher, I would have not dropped my high school.
finally I understood how the universe works, thank you Arvin! 🙏☀️🌌
Grate stuff🙌
8:00 I think you should have shown the waveform of the particle when it tunnels through the barrier. Firstly it makes it more clear how a particle is able to tunnel, secondly since it actually is a waveform process that allows the particle to tunnel it's also a more correct explanation of the actually physics.
Yes, that would be a more precise way to describe it, but in order to do that I would have to spend at least a few more minutes explaining that in more depth. I made an in depth video on tunneling here: th-cam.com/video/YstJxj30hzs/w-d-xo.html
In Hindu civilisation, the Sun is still worshiped daily - as the ultimate dispeller of darkness ( both literally and metaphorically)
he cant mention that coz he is ashamed of his origin so he try to hide any reference that can revile his origin ,u can see that in his name like its Avinash but he made is Arvin Ash so that its look more like Westman name , most of oversees Indian Dharmic Origin peoples hav a mantel illness call Infirioty Complex , and also u can find it in Modern Day Indian Hindus in India too , i think its came from 600 years of continues Islamic Invasion and 200 years of European Colonializations
@@Tilak-Chatterjee he is not indian and his name is arvin ash and don't take a religious talk now...... Research is still going on....
@@Tilak-Chatterjee There's no problem in being Indian and scientist at the same time, there were amazing Indian scientists from the time that made amazing work in physics, i don't think Arvin is ashamed of anything about his origins or so.
But it's all science bruh
Yes I am from india I know am aware of this and ya we should thank thermonuclear reaction🙏🙏 helping us to survive
Every student needs a teacher like you! Awesome explanation! ✨
You are HOTTER than the sun☀
If ash was our teacher we will be living in space already
Fantastic! I wish more science videos were as straightforward and detailed as this.
That was deep man... I had an epiphany because of that video! I actually understand planks constant now! Wow! Mind blown!
A great job of taking something dry and complicated and explaining it in a clear and simple way to make it interesting. Suggestion at 6 minutes 41 seconds is to label the X and Y axes on the graph. X-axis being inter-particle distance, and Y-axis being potential energy or force.
Wonderfully explained and great graphics! Arvin anticipated every one of my queries 😅 - thanks so much!!
Arvin, I have some well pondered questions. I need to understand the engineering of a fabricated versus natural fusion reactor. Here are some questions: 1. If the sun is plasma then the gravity of the sun should confine the highest density plasma at the center. Therefore, are electrons available for appearance in the orbits of P-N or P-P nuclei? Are electrons hanging out ready to appear in a fully functional He Atom? 2. Or do they just quantum tunnel off somewhere? 3. Are protons pushed past the "Columb" barrier or do Neutrons just get close enough to overcome the strong nuclear distance for bonding and then bond as a P-N or do protons get pushed next to each other due to the pressure and force? How much is due to N Beta decay and how much happens as direct P-P compliance? Do N's bump into the P's and bond and some P's bond to some P's in some ratio? You mentioned the Berylium path, is this a minority path or some set percentage?
The stocking cap…. Is that like keeping in heat in an overcooked brain?😂. Your videos and explanations are amazing. Thank you for sharing your amazing knowledge.
Mükemmel anlatım.
Impressive explained. Thank you so much Ash.
Thank you Arvin Ash !
The best explanation until now ❤️❤️! Thanks a ton, Arvin 🔥!
Extremely well done!! I am fascinated with stars!
Truly one of the best channels ever on TH-cam, I just love this content, and Arvin Ash is a great teacher!!!
Wow. This is a much deeper explanation than I have heard in the past.
Thank you so much, I found you channel only recently and LOVE your indepth explanations. Everytime I think I still have a question about something you said...you follow it up with that exact explanation!
Amazing. I can't believe I have a chance to understand how the sun shines !
I love the part " so let's go one step deeper"
I just discovered this channel and I like it. I think that there is a lot of things in macro and micro universe that people can't understand because our perception is limited by three dimensional space and one dimensional time.
I love your videos, you're the best teacher! Greetings from Uruguay!
Good and reasonable easy explanation.
THANK YOU DR.ARVIN ASH...!!!
Why is there not more views on this video? This was a great explanation of the major player in why all of us even exist.
In 2013 I quit pursuing mechanical engineering because I didn’t have any teachers who helped things click for me. I do graphic design now but often miss science. I wish I had teachers who explained and applied topics like this.
In the beginning of the video I was like (I know all this) then you went in.... to the math of quantum physics and nailed it 👍👌👏👏👏👏👏
Have to watch this a few more times to get it. I have seen that graph that shows Iron being the last element in the fusion process.
Very well done video! My only complaint is about the statement that wood releases 10^-19 Watts per atom when it is burned. I tried doing this calculation and got about 10^-19 Joules per atom. To convert this to Watts, you need to divide by the time it takes for the wood to burn. If you assume the log burns up in 1 hour, then you get an average power of about 10^-24 Watts per atom. I think you should be looking at the energy per atom, not power per atom.
Good upgrade. thanks.
Hi Arvin/viewers
Since a proton can beta-decay into a neutron, neutrino and positron, how does it make sense for a neutron decaying into a proton, electron and anti neutrino? Is it because a proton can only beta-decay if it has a lot of kinetic energy, and that energy is enough to create the extra mass needed?
Have a great day everyone
Just such a great video my friend
What a gem Arvin is!