I’ve seen a couple of videos from you now back to back and I seriously thought you were a somewhat bigger youtuber that has been doing this for a long time. Great job on your videos man. Keep it up. 👍
It's a good one! And be careful. Buying games can be an addiction 😅 just get at least 50% through before buying another. Then you know you at least enjoyed it. Some games I buy and don't even download for....an embarrassingly long amount of time. Lol
@@howtoplayntrollwithstyle6208 oh yeah. Especially in close quarters. It definitely takes a little getting used to. If your looking for a good feeling flight game, WARPLANES: WWI Fighters is pretty awesome. The real war setting uses no gaming HUD and feels like your actually flying an old WWI plane.
25% discount has hit a limit and no longer available. I'm told that 10% is available now, but Meta could run that well dry too🙄 If you have a friend that has it on your oculus have them send you thiers for 25% off.
That would be amazing. My hope is they do superman in vr. That first iron man plane mission is JUST like superman. Flying in sky, save plane by using super strength to fix wings and stuck gear, then finish it off by carrying the civilian in your arms to safety. Superman should be a vr project. Power him down or use kryptonite or something idk whatever you have to do to make it challenging.
It will be super awesome when we have games like this in a seamless, open world. Then we can have moments when we can take our time to explore or just goof around. As a casual player I tend to like less intense games but with the option to go bonkers and battle hordes of enemies when I feel the desire. 😂
No joke. Technically, they could do it now it would just be at the sacrifice of graphics. VR renders the game 2 separate times. Once for each eye. So that's the main reason why graphics aren't better. If you were willing to have walk about mini graphics you could totally have an open world game.
@@ilikestuff8218 asgard's wrath 2. it's the closest we have. I'd say it did it, but I would love an open world flying game like iron man or superman with no visible loading points. Graphics in asgards wrath 2 are awesome. Everytime I play it im fascinated by the hands and weapons in my face.... and the enemies getting cut in half. That's pretty cool. Lol
@@superhippieman I don't mind simplistic graphics in the least. It gives developers time to focus on the game's world and other mechanics. I prefer fun games over pretty ones.
It really does feel that way. The hand controls for flying is perfect. I just wish I could hang from a harness and use my feet too for more maneuvers 😅
It’s the only game I bought for quest two that I asked for the money back within the timeframe. I just thought it looked too crappy with the graphics. Now I’m watching these videos on the three, and it’s a lot better. I might actually get this game again and keep it.
The graphics aren't technically any better.... you can just see them. Lol. I hear with that quest 3 optimizer app it's even better. But I haven't tried that myself. I should really get on that.
@@superhippieman100% get quest games optimizer. Some of the games I've played with the resolution and power levels boosted, look better than what my PC is able to put out right now.
3:10 The reason a VR games visuals are blurry outside the focal point is not because of Fresnel lenses, it is because they are using Fixed Foveated Rendering (FFR) and only making the center have the highest resolution. It a game is doing that, it doesn't matter if the headset has Fresnel or Pancake lens, only the focal point is rendered at highest quality so if you look to sides using eyes instead of head movement, you will see lower resolution / blurry image because those parts of the game are expected to be seen by your peripheral vision which doesn't see high detail anyway. To have full clarity within headset no matter where you look, you either need high-end PCVR that can render all parts of all frames at highest quality, or your headset needs eye-tracking and then the game uses Eye-Tracked Dynamic Foveated Rendering (ETDFR). In this scenario, you can look around within your headset using eyes and still see highest quality no matter where you look. Where Pancake lens are better is in allowing the player to wear the headset less optimally and still see the display panels more clearly. You still have to wear your headset correctly (especially vertically) when using Pancake lens or you will get fish bowl effect around the edges or other distorted visuals, and you still should dial in your IPD to be right for your eyes or you will get more headaches. If the Quest 3 with its Pancake lens did not still require IPD adjustments for optimal use, they would not have provided the physical dial to adjust it. The same way they don't provide a decent face shield, properly charging adapter (18w included, 45w recommended), crap headset strap included that everyone will have to replace.
Fresnel lenses absolutley are more fuzzy around the edges due to how they work. Yes, the headset renders for optimization of the center, but it only takes one experiment to physically see that with pancake lenses the edge clarity is MUCH better than fresnel lenses. I still switch between headsets regularly in dogfighting games and the fresnel lenses have a very clear center and not clear edges. Pancake is not the case. Just try it out. Otherwise there would literally be no point in having pancake.
@@superhippieman I am left assuming you haven't played any games that use Eye-Tracked Foveated Rendering because you are using headsets that don't have that capability. I have used VR headsets that use Fresnel and FFR for years, the PSVR2 which supports ETDFR for close to a year, and most recently I have been using the Quest 3 with its Pancake lens as well. Since the Quest 3 once accessorized is just as expensive or more as the Quest Pro (comes with elite strap, charging dock, 45w power adapter, better face shield, etc), sometimes I have regret that I got the Quest 3 instead of the Quest Pro which does support ETDFR. The Pancake lens really hasn't impressed me as much as ETDFR (on Fresnel) has for image quality & clarity. Will be interesting to see how things look on the Apple Vision Pro headsets which is the first VR headset I am aware of that is capable of both ETDFR and has Pancake lens.
@@cusman oh the apple vision pro will blow everything out of the water, and I definitely can tell when the quest 3 is not fully rendering in peripherals, but I will literally lose planes in my peripherals with fresnel lenses. I don't have that happen with pancake. I guess what im wondering us if you notice a difference in peripherals between Q2 and Q3 as that is the main point of this video is those two headsets. Pro was not included on purpose.
@@terrystokes7893 correct but the visuals still blow everything out of the water which is what I was referring too, not that it is a gaming focused headset. We were simply discussing visuals. But the vision pro visuals are at a great cost which you just mentioned.
Though it has higher pixel count, the biggest reason is simply the pancake lenses. You can actually SEE what's there. The quest 2 has decent resolution and power but those lenses just ruin it. It's too foggy to see what's ACTUALLY there. I still love the quest 2 but yeah....if you want better VR......quest three.....no brainer
It absolutely does need to be optimized to further preserve this game wow some people shouldn't be allowed to give their gaming insights just destroying the industry.
First, quest 2 is fine to play this with. Quest 3- The better controllers allow for less freezing of the hands if you get a little crazy, it has very little (if any) frame rate issues on the 3 and the simple fact that it has better pixel count AND pancake lenses means it looks better without upgrades. Combine that with the unofficial quest 3 optimization app and this game can really shine. But the quest 2 is still a valid option as there's no mixed reality or specific quest 3 texture upgrades for Iron man VR. In the description I have links for the quest 2 AND quest 3 and a discount on the game.
Man I also think these controllers are better but it seems it’s not like that for every game. It seems they are worse for eleven table tennis and other sport games. Like fast paced workout boxing and stuff like that
@@superhippieman quest 2 definitely keep better tracking on table tennis but it might be because of occlusion issue and it gets even worse if you use paddle adapters. I googled the issue to see if I was the only one complaining and it seems is a spread out problem in this game and a couple of others. But like I said in my previous message they seem to work as good or even slightly better in some instances as well so my guess is they probably improve the tracking capabilities of the headset or the software via AI but the actual controllers are worse because of the position of the lights the headset needs to see to track them. Also you might have noticed. Now if I leave the controllers hanging from my wrist I lose track of the controllers instantly (they would go to the roof or all the way to the floor) but with q2 I would still have my virtual hands hanging in the right place
@@joseandresjulienbarriere8786 yeah they definitely lose tracking if I set them down or hang. Was not the case before. You can use your 2 controllers with them however if you want. I believe the pro too
Hmm, this is a quest channel, but maybe it will help if people have more context. At what point does it not work? Start up? Can't see but can hear? Controller issues? Black screen? Stuck on logo? Keep in mind I don't do psvr2 but many people here do and may have experienced your issue.
@@jason305dallascowboysfan8 Thanks! maybe trade that thing in for a Quest 3, lol, na psvr2 is cool, i just prefer stand alone headsets. It really helps with immersion.
@superhippieman but let's be real. The idea was good. But it's to much talking the graphics where amazingly bad. Overall the execution was done poorly. It maybe fun for some but I did not have the patience for it
@@spidermonkeynr1 I respect the opinion, but I love it. I mean its that simple. If the sky is blue and someone tells me it's green all I can do is so ok. I see blue. Green sounds cool but I can't see that. I played a great game. I don't know why you didn't but I did. Not every cup of tea works for every person. Just life my man.
Stand alone vr man. There's only so much computer people are willing to wear on their face. PC vr wil always have more power. I stopped being a graphics gamer around 2010. Too many crappy looking classics to play that way.
@@superhippieman Fair enough. The game design itself looks so messy and epileptic to me that it immediately put me off. I don't understand why they have to clutter the screen so much tbf.. and what good are extremely well designed and detailed assets and animations when they are surrounded by Duke Nukem era 'explosions', Fourth Of July firecracker effects and energy beams that look like your shooting pieces of blue candy out of your suit!? ;;)
@@theyshouldhavenevergivenme5439 your commentary is hilarious 😅 excellent visuals. I remember when Duke nukem came out. Our minds were blown. Bad graphics might not affect me as much simply because of the nostalgia I get from the pioneer style visuals in some of these games.
Oh man I couldn't disagree more. Though....I LOVE the first mission. It's not hard.... there's not much to do, you're just flying by a plane. As the game goes on you actually get to points where you die. Lol. Real challenges, upgrades and skills needed. Could use more environments but not unhappy. You said after the first mission. Just curious....Was the first mission awesome to you or did you feel it was a good starting point and nothing ever got better?
@@MrDeathwishVR I respect the opinion 🙌 Super disagree but I could see how the first mission could be a high point that never felt met again. It's got a real "super hero" vibe to it. As a major superman fan I was like.... this is a superman game that is actually GOOD 😅 if only.
@superhippieman I mean, I get if you wanna promote the game so everyone buys it using your referral but I don't play like that, this game first appeared a couple years back for the psvr1 and it wasn't that good then, so to say it dominates on quest 3 when there are much higher quality games on the system is a big stretch..
@@superhippieman so I've played at least a hundred different titles in VR, Iron Man just fell off the whole time. On the Quest 2 and the quest 3. It's one of the only titles that made me have motion sickness.
@@2Guys1ControllerShow ooohhh. You never got your VR legs. This game hasn't made me sick at all with zero comfort settings. 100s means nothing to improve motion sickness if they're not motion sickness inducing. Only play for small bits until you get used to it.
@@superhippieman I have 1000s of hours in VR. I definitely have my "VR" legs lol. There's something with the fps/fov that makes Iron Man very off putting for me.
@@2Guys1ControllerShow weird. I had no issue. Im a light weight with motion sickness. Lots of new games have given a little after an hour of play even after gaining my vr legs in flight sims. This one didn't. Do you think that's the only thing that ruined it or were you also unimpressed by story, graphics, gameplay etc.
🔥SHAMELESS SELF PROMOTION🔥
Check out the description for links to the BEST Quest accessories I use!
I played this on psvr1 and I'm sure someone already said this but it makes you feel like iron man
It's worth saying again 🤣
I’ve seen a couple of videos from you now back to back and I seriously thought you were a somewhat bigger youtuber that has been doing this for a long time. Great job on your videos man. Keep it up. 👍
Thanks! That's way to nice of praise but I'll take it! And I definitely plan on keeping it up.
This looks like a fun game. Really great video, I’ve watched the last three and you’re amazing.
You are too kind. I do the best I can with what time I have. I only plan on doing even more so keep looking out for me!
Nice dude
I just got my Quest 3
I definitely gonna pick this game next month, I always liked Iron Man
I bought too many games this month 😂😂😂
It's a good one! And be careful. Buying games can be an addiction 😅 just get at least 50% through before buying another. Then you know you at least enjoyed it. Some games I buy and don't even download for....an embarrassingly long amount of time. Lol
well, i would buy it just for the flight gameplay 😅
They did really good on the flying mechanics. Very "iron man" in controls, no feet tracking, but even without it the hand movement are spot on.
@@superhippieman i m tempted now :D, do you feel the speed?
@@howtoplayntrollwithstyle6208 oh yeah. Especially in close quarters. It definitely takes a little getting used to. If your looking for a good feeling flight game, WARPLANES: WWI Fighters is pretty awesome. The real war setting uses no gaming HUD and feels like your actually flying an old WWI plane.
@@superhippieman thanks a lot bro, i ll try and buy both 😁😁
@@superhippieman but i ll start with Iron man
25% discount has hit a limit and no longer available. I'm told that 10% is available now, but Meta could run that well dry too🙄
If you have a friend that has it on your oculus have them send you thiers for 25% off.
I just bought the game so have a fresh referal to get your viewers 25% off but don't want to post unless you say it's ok.
@@usuqa9172 feel free to post it right here! It's all about spreading the discount!
@@usuqa9172please post!
I wish Meta Quest 3 had an awesome Spider-Man game too.
That would be amazing. My hope is they do superman in vr. That first iron man plane mission is JUST like superman. Flying in sky, save plane by using super strength to fix wings and stuck gear, then finish it off by carrying the civilian in your arms to safety. Superman should be a vr project. Power him down or use kryptonite or something idk whatever you have to do to make it challenging.
Resist is what you are looking for. The best spider man alternative on the Quest store.
It will be super awesome when we have games like this in a seamless, open world. Then we can have moments when we can take our time to explore or just goof around. As a casual player I tend to like less intense games but with the option to go bonkers and battle hordes of enemies when I feel the desire. 😂
No joke. Technically, they could do it now it would just be at the sacrifice of graphics. VR renders the game 2 separate times. Once for each eye. So that's the main reason why graphics aren't better. If you were willing to have walk about mini graphics you could totally have an open world game.
Asgard's Wrath 2
@@ilikestuff8218 asgard's wrath 2. it's the closest we have. I'd say it did it, but I would love an open world flying game like iron man or superman with no visible loading points. Graphics in asgards wrath 2 are awesome. Everytime I play it im fascinated by the hands and weapons in my face.... and the enemies getting cut in half. That's pretty cool. Lol
@@superhippieman I don't mind simplistic graphics in the least. It gives developers time to focus on the game's world and other mechanics. I prefer fun games over pretty ones.
@@williammcleroy558 same here. That's exactly what minecraft was btw. And it's STILL GOING. Lol.
Tho so game really is awesome, it’s like the character iron man was made for vr
It really does feel that way. The hand controls for flying is perfect. I just wish I could hang from a harness and use my feet too for more maneuvers 😅
It’s the only game I bought for quest two that I asked for the money back within the timeframe. I just thought it looked too crappy with the graphics. Now I’m watching these videos on the three, and it’s a lot better. I might actually get this game again and keep it.
The graphics aren't technically any better.... you can just see them. Lol. I hear with that quest 3 optimizer app it's even better. But I haven't tried that myself. I should really get on that.
@@superhippieman100% get quest games optimizer. Some of the games I've played with the resolution and power levels boosted, look better than what my PC is able to put out right now.
@@judahsfinest1860 what is your experience with battery life using it?
@@superhippieman really no different, quest 3 battery is what it is to begin with. But I still get about 2 hours, maybe less.
@@judahsfinest1860 yeah, I need to do that
With the Quest Game Optimizer it's damn near unstoppable! [:]~))
It gives the game its own "iron suit" 😅
Great video! Thanks. My god I need this game on the PSVR 2.
Thanks! And It will be worth it! It's a great VR experience.
25% discount? How?
Well, I've just been informed by a commenter that the discount limit has been hit. So no more discount. 😪
Run it through the Quest Game Optimiser. Bang that resolution and hrs up.
🤩
What were you able to get it to?
@@thegarch3293 I have yet to try it. How does it impact battery?
@@thegarch3293 I have yet to try it. How does it impact battery?
I haven’t noticed any impact but I’m using a good battery strap
3:10 The reason a VR games visuals are blurry outside the focal point is not because of Fresnel lenses, it is because they are using Fixed Foveated Rendering (FFR) and only making the center have the highest resolution. It a game is doing that, it doesn't matter if the headset has Fresnel or Pancake lens, only the focal point is rendered at highest quality so if you look to sides using eyes instead of head movement, you will see lower resolution / blurry image because those parts of the game are expected to be seen by your peripheral vision which doesn't see high detail anyway.
To have full clarity within headset no matter where you look, you either need high-end PCVR that can render all parts of all frames at highest quality, or your headset needs eye-tracking and then the game uses Eye-Tracked Dynamic Foveated Rendering (ETDFR). In this scenario, you can look around within your headset using eyes and still see highest quality no matter where you look.
Where Pancake lens are better is in allowing the player to wear the headset less optimally and still see the display panels more clearly. You still have to wear your headset correctly (especially vertically) when using Pancake lens or you will get fish bowl effect around the edges or other distorted visuals, and you still should dial in your IPD to be right for your eyes or you will get more headaches. If the Quest 3 with its Pancake lens did not still require IPD adjustments for optimal use, they would not have provided the physical dial to adjust it.
The same way they don't provide a decent face shield, properly charging adapter (18w included, 45w recommended), crap headset strap included that everyone will have to replace.
Fresnel lenses absolutley are more fuzzy around the edges due to how they work. Yes, the headset renders for optimization of the center, but it only takes one experiment to physically see that with pancake lenses the edge clarity is MUCH better than fresnel lenses. I still switch between headsets regularly in dogfighting games and the fresnel lenses have a very clear center and not clear edges. Pancake is not the case. Just try it out. Otherwise there would literally be no point in having pancake.
@@superhippieman I am left assuming you haven't played any games that use Eye-Tracked Foveated Rendering because you are using headsets that don't have that capability.
I have used VR headsets that use Fresnel and FFR for years, the PSVR2 which supports ETDFR for close to a year, and most recently I have been using the Quest 3 with its Pancake lens as well.
Since the Quest 3 once accessorized is just as expensive or more as the Quest Pro (comes with elite strap, charging dock, 45w power adapter, better face shield, etc), sometimes I have regret that I got the Quest 3 instead of the Quest Pro which does support ETDFR. The Pancake lens really hasn't impressed me as much as ETDFR (on Fresnel) has for image quality & clarity.
Will be interesting to see how things look on the Apple Vision Pro headsets which is the first VR headset I am aware of that is capable of both ETDFR and has Pancake lens.
@@cusman oh the apple vision pro will blow everything out of the water, and I definitely can tell when the quest 3 is not fully rendering in peripherals, but I will literally lose planes in my peripherals with fresnel lenses. I don't have that happen with pancake. I guess what im wondering us if you notice a difference in peripherals between Q2 and Q3 as that is the main point of this video is those two headsets. Pro was not included on purpose.
Apple vision pro....$3500.....no thanks, and it's made for creativity and developers....not gaming @@superhippieman
@@terrystokes7893 correct but the visuals still blow everything out of the water which is what I was referring too, not that it is a gaming focused headset. We were simply discussing visuals. But the vision pro visuals are at a great cost which you just mentioned.
not enough people apretiate what diference sound makes
Very true. When I first got my quest 3 I played my favorite game and INSTANTLY felt more immersed just simply due to how great it sounded.
It really is a great game
Agreed. I hope they do even better with Batman Arkham Shadow.
Every game I own looks better on the quest 3 either with an upgrade or none at all
Though it has higher pixel count, the biggest reason is simply the pancake lenses. You can actually SEE what's there. The quest 2 has decent resolution and power but those lenses just ruin it. It's too foggy to see what's ACTUALLY there. I still love the quest 2 but yeah....if you want better VR......quest three.....no brainer
nice vid bro and you can upd the resolution via quest game optimizer
Thanks man! A couple people have mentioned that about the optimizer, I guess I should have said it in the video. What's impact on battery?
@@superhippieman depends on how high you go.. But never noticed it that much. But the graphic difference is insane... Was even good on q2.. Try it
I need to get around it it. You're like the 3rd person to tell me to try it 😅
@@superhippieman get on it.. You missing out.. 😂
@@maximilian_puetz I know 😅
Nice video... sounds like a fun game! I have the Quest3 with 512gb... so space enough for some nice games.... 😊😊
This one is worth it! I did NOT get 512. Big mistake. Lol.
It absolutely does need to be optimized to further preserve this game wow some people shouldn't be allowed to give their gaming insights just destroying the industry.
What?
you've reached your referral limit mate, no 25% discount for anyone.
Worked for me js
@Thankfulgamer just tried it there. says he's reached the referral limit and offering 10%. I'll wait for a half price sale.
Yep. That's a recent terms of service we can change anything anytime deal. Should be 10% from here on out.
Yeah... meta does that now....I'm not sure what the limit is either.
I did notice some lag in the Rock Bottom mission on Meta Quest 3.
Really, where you recording or using quest optimizer?
@@superhippieman no.
Would you say it makes a difference on quest 3
First, quest 2 is fine to play this with. Quest 3- The better controllers allow for less freezing of the hands if you get a little crazy, it has very little (if any) frame rate issues on the 3 and the simple fact that it has better pixel count AND pancake lenses means it looks better without upgrades. Combine that with the unofficial quest 3 optimization app and this game can really shine. But the quest 2 is still a valid option as there's no mixed reality or specific quest 3 texture upgrades for Iron man VR.
In the description I have links for the quest 2 AND quest 3 and a discount on the game.
Thanks
@@LemonyLimeYT not a problem, thanks for watching!
Man I also think these controllers are better but it seems it’s not like that for every game. It seems they are worse for eleven table tennis and other sport games. Like fast paced workout boxing and stuff like that
Do you mean tracking wise the q2 controllers keep up better on faster movements?
@@superhippieman quest 2 definitely keep better tracking on table tennis but it might be because of occlusion issue and it gets even worse if you use paddle adapters. I googled the issue to see if I was the only one complaining and it seems is a spread out problem in this game and a couple of others. But like I said in my previous message they seem to work as good or even slightly better in some instances as well so my guess is they probably improve the tracking capabilities of the headset or the software via AI but the actual controllers are worse because of the position of the lights the headset needs to see to track them.
Also you might have noticed. Now if I leave the controllers hanging from my wrist I lose track of the controllers instantly (they would go to the roof or all the way to the floor) but with q2 I would still have my virtual hands hanging in the right place
@@joseandresjulienbarriere8786 yeah they definitely lose tracking if I set them down or hang. Was not the case before. You can use your 2 controllers with them however if you want. I believe the pro too
@@superhippieman hmm. I had understood you can’t you quest 2 controllers with it. Maybe it was in the very beginning. Thx for the info though
@@joseandresjulienbarriere8786 I believe that's correct 🤔 now I'm doubting
Can somebody tell me what else do I need to get this game to work on my PsVR2. I have everything set up, but the game not working for me
Just found out it’s not for PSVR2 😢
Hmm, this is a quest channel, but maybe it will help if people have more context. At what point does it not work? Start up? Can't see but can hear? Controller issues? Black screen? Stuck on logo? Keep in mind I don't do psvr2 but many people here do and may have experienced your issue.
@@jason305dallascowboysfan8 ah, well, that will do it. I find it odd psvr games won't work on psvr2. That's unfortunate
Thanks , I just ran cross your channel and now I Subscribe to you. It won’t start.
@@jason305dallascowboysfan8 Thanks! maybe trade that thing in for a Quest 3, lol, na psvr2 is cool, i just prefer stand alone headsets. It really helps with immersion.
Who paid you to make this. This game was mehhh
Tony Stark. He gave me a jet pack and a coffee maker equipped with Jarvis. He tells me when I need more coffee.
@superhippieman but let's be real. The idea was good. But it's to much talking the graphics where amazingly bad. Overall the execution was done poorly. It maybe fun for some but I did not have the patience for it
@@spidermonkeynr1 I respect the opinion, but I love it. I mean its that simple. If the sky is blue and someone tells me it's green all I can do is so ok. I see blue. Green sounds cool but I can't see that. I played a great game. I don't know why you didn't but I did. Not every cup of tea works for every person. Just life my man.
ngl but this looks incredibly takcy and crappy.. look at those 1997 explosions.
Stand alone vr man. There's only so much computer people are willing to wear on their face. PC vr wil always have more power. I stopped being a graphics gamer around 2010. Too many crappy looking classics to play that way.
@@superhippieman Fair enough. The game design itself looks so messy and epileptic to me that it immediately put me off.
I don't understand why they have to clutter the screen so much tbf.. and what good are extremely well designed and detailed assets and animations when they are surrounded by Duke Nukem era 'explosions', Fourth Of July firecracker effects and energy beams that look like your shooting pieces of blue candy out of your suit!? ;;)
@@theyshouldhavenevergivenme5439 your commentary is hilarious 😅 excellent visuals. I remember when Duke nukem came out. Our minds were blown. Bad graphics might not affect me as much simply because of the nostalgia I get from the pioneer style visuals in some of these games.
After the first mission, this game is kinda meh...
Oh man I couldn't disagree more. Though....I LOVE the first mission. It's not hard.... there's not much to do, you're just flying by a plane. As the game goes on you actually get to points where you die. Lol. Real challenges, upgrades and skills needed. Could use more environments but not unhappy.
You said after the first mission. Just curious....Was the first mission awesome to you or did you feel it was a good starting point and nothing ever got better?
@superhippieman yeah basically a good start that fizzled out.. It's not a really bad game. it's just not amazing
@@MrDeathwishVR I respect the opinion 🙌
Super disagree but I could see how the first mission could be a high point that never felt met again. It's got a real "super hero" vibe to it. As a major superman fan I was like.... this is a superman game that is actually GOOD 😅 if only.
@superhippieman I mean, I get if you wanna promote the game so everyone buys it using your referral but I don't play like that, this game first appeared a couple years back for the psvr1 and it wasn't that good then, so to say it dominates on quest 3 when there are much higher quality games on the system is a big stretch..
@@MrDeathwishVR not dominates the quest 3, it dominates ON quest 3. Literally just iron man vs iron man. The game is best on quest 3.
This game was awful on Quest 2 and 3.
Do tell! I mean saying it's awful is easy. What aspects about the game made you find it so bad? Why was it also bad on quest 3?
@@superhippieman so I've played at least a hundred different titles in VR, Iron Man just fell off the whole time. On the Quest 2 and the quest 3. It's one of the only titles that made me have motion sickness.
@@2Guys1ControllerShow ooohhh. You never got your VR legs. This game hasn't made me sick at all with zero comfort settings. 100s means nothing to improve motion sickness if they're not motion sickness inducing. Only play for small bits until you get used to it.
@@superhippieman I have 1000s of hours in VR. I definitely have my "VR" legs lol.
There's something with the fps/fov that makes Iron Man very off putting for me.
@@2Guys1ControllerShow weird. I had no issue. Im a light weight with motion sickness. Lots of new games have given a little after an hour of play even after gaining my vr legs in flight sims. This one didn't. Do you think that's the only thing that ruined it or were you also unimpressed by story, graphics, gameplay etc.