It's interesting that multiple, independent lines of evidence point to a much younger age for the earth than the dates given by lomg-lived radioactive elements.
This is a premise I presented a novitiate in summer catechism, at seven. When Adam and Eve left the Garden of Eden, they lost 2% of their ‘Image of God’ (Free will) and became apes; and, the enormity of original sin caused their descendants to lose all of their physical ‘Image of God’ (98%) and became Neanderthals, with free will (2%), to restart God’s experiment.
1. 8:00 u just assert ur worldview with a god as its foundation to be the only one not having the problem with not knowing if observations can be true. U dont have any more basis then any other worldview, all stil have for example the problem of the brain in a vat. 2. 10:00 a mousetrap isnt irriducabelly complex. U have to provide evidence of an structure/mechanisme in our body to be so. Else its just an argument from incredulity. 3. 12:00 plz provide an adaptation between 2 families/kinds that cant happen and is in ur words a boundary for evolution. Right now ur just making unfouned claims. 4. Just before the 15:00 u roughly said" major mutations are leathal". Ever heard of whole genome duplications. They happen and are imo very major, but apparently dont kill the organism. If a mutation extreme doesnt mean immediate death. 5. 18:00-19:00 so ur saying the evolution of snake venom happened, only ur claiming it to have happened in a way shorter time and give credit to ur god/satin. Without evidence for the extra steps, pascals wager is on our side in this case. Edit: (even though geology isnt my forte i can still comment on some stuff) 6. 21:00 ur assumeong the conditions and processes to be constant over millions of years. As an geoligist u should know better. As an layman i can think of iceages, uplifting, sealevels, the separation of america and europe/africa. 7. 23:30 plz provide the paper about fossils still smelling like dead bodies. 8. 24:30 Host: " these findings are not done by Christians/creationists". Dude, literally the example u gave of the trex tissue was discovered by Mary Schweitzer. An (at the time of discovery) creationist. She literally is now arguing against creationist misusing her findings like u. Plz be more credible. 9. 26:30 i now believe ur not a real geologist or just lying. Trying to date a million year old carbon sample is just radiometric decay 101. It has a max range of around 200.000 years old. 10. 31:00 u claim the layers were formed rapidly. Plz provide the mechanism that will sort these layers during a flood. IMPORTANT: include in ur explanation the oscillation between flood-deposits and desert-deposits or other layers that require a dry Environment. 11. 32:30 that is just blatantly false. Off the top of my head the famous La brea tar-pits (with dinosaurs) come to mind. Ur just lying now and lost all my respect. 12. 34:00 "integelent desing doesnt start with a godbelieve" false, miller vs dover, the intelligent design side was litterly creationists trying to hide the fact they were creationists. Also the biggest creationist organisation requires u to sign a waiver saying ur a creationist. Dont try to pretend ur starting without a god believe in mind. 13. 35:50 plz provide evidence that that could not happen naturally. Again u just assert it. 14. 37:00 "a lot of scientist have decided to throw away the possibility of a god" again, provide the study that supports this, stop lying.
@@johncollins7062 well seeing i have never heard of that saying kinda confirms the age difference here. And u making an age insult in the 1st place instead of addressing my counter points to the vid kinda tells me being old is in ur opinion a hurfull thing...
@@galaxyTMOW- Not hearing that, and pre-school texting, in a a mature conversation, means you never made it to the fifth grade. When you express your self maturely, you will be treated that way.
It's interesting that multiple, independent lines of evidence point to a much younger age for the earth than the dates given by lomg-lived radioactive elements.
🙌🏼
This is a premise I presented a novitiate in summer catechism, at seven. When Adam and Eve left the Garden of Eden, they lost 2% of their ‘Image of God’ (Free will) and became apes; and, the enormity of original sin caused their descendants to lose all of their physical ‘Image of God’ (98%) and became Neanderthals, with free will (2%), to restart God’s experiment.
"The human eye is incompatible with evolution." - Charles Darwin
Try to read the next sentence he wrote.
He smiled that the Rex comment, it’s not a Rex.
Does Southern Adventist University require a declaration of faith like other religious universities?
nope
1. 8:00 u just assert ur worldview with a god as its foundation to be the only one not having the problem with not knowing if observations can be true. U dont have any more basis then any other worldview, all stil have for example the problem of the brain in a vat.
2. 10:00 a mousetrap isnt irriducabelly complex. U have to provide evidence of an structure/mechanisme in our body to be so. Else its just an argument from incredulity.
3. 12:00 plz provide an adaptation between 2 families/kinds that cant happen and is in ur words a boundary for evolution. Right now ur just making unfouned claims.
4. Just before the 15:00 u roughly said" major mutations are leathal". Ever heard of whole genome duplications. They happen and are imo very major, but apparently dont kill the organism. If a mutation extreme doesnt mean immediate death.
5. 18:00-19:00 so ur saying the evolution of snake venom happened, only ur claiming it to have happened in a way shorter time and give credit to ur god/satin. Without evidence for the extra steps, pascals wager is on our side in this case.
Edit: (even though geology isnt my forte i can still comment on some stuff)
6. 21:00 ur assumeong the conditions and processes to be constant over millions of years. As an geoligist u should know better. As an layman i can think of iceages, uplifting, sealevels, the separation of america and europe/africa.
7. 23:30 plz provide the paper about fossils still smelling like dead bodies.
8. 24:30 Host: " these findings are not done by Christians/creationists". Dude, literally the example u gave of the trex tissue was discovered by Mary Schweitzer. An (at the time of discovery) creationist. She literally is now arguing against creationist misusing her findings like u. Plz be more credible.
9. 26:30 i now believe ur not a real geologist or just lying. Trying to date a million year old carbon sample is just radiometric decay 101. It has a max range of around 200.000 years old.
10. 31:00 u claim the layers were formed rapidly. Plz provide the mechanism that will sort these layers during a flood. IMPORTANT: include in ur explanation the oscillation between flood-deposits and desert-deposits or other layers that require a dry Environment.
11. 32:30 that is just blatantly false. Off the top of my head the famous La brea tar-pits (with dinosaurs) come to mind. Ur just lying now and lost all my respect.
12. 34:00 "integelent desing doesnt start with a godbelieve" false, miller vs dover, the intelligent design side was litterly creationists trying to hide the fact they were creationists.
Also the biggest creationist organisation requires u to sign a waiver saying ur a creationist. Dont try to pretend ur starting without a god believe in mind.
13. 35:50 plz provide evidence that that could not happen naturally. Again u just assert it.
14. 37:00 "a lot of scientist have decided to throw away the possibility of a god" again, provide the study that supports this, stop lying.
Face book misses you.
@@johncollins7062 facebook* and nah, its too cringe. the stone age misses you..
@@galaxyTMOW- I'm rubber and your glue, is the best you can come up with?
@@johncollins7062 well seeing i have never heard of that saying kinda confirms the age difference here.
And u making an age insult in the 1st place instead of addressing my counter points to the vid kinda tells me being old is in ur opinion a hurfull thing...
@@galaxyTMOW- Not hearing that, and pre-school texting, in a a mature conversation, means you never made it to the fifth grade. When you express your self maturely, you will be treated that way.