Making PCB Motor v3

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 พ.ค. 2024
  • This video is about my third brushless PCB Motor prototype! I explain the lessons-learned from my older versions and the reason behind every design choice I made, to try and improve its performance!
    Thank you PCBWay for sponsoring my PCBs: www.pcbway.com
    PCB Design Software that I use: carlbugeja.com/altium
    Free Version of Altium's Pro Version: www.altium.com/circuitmaker
    Open Source files: hackaday.io/project/39494-pcb...
    Support my work on Patreon: / carlbugeja
    Cameras/Tools I use (affiliate links):
    Main Camera: amzn.to/30tRgY7
    Second Camera: amzn.to/2ZLm2wy
    Light Setup: amzn.to/3jtqckA
    Magnifying Lamp: amzn.to/3jrcaQv
    Vernier Caliper: amzn.to/3eTju3I
    Multi-meter: amzn.to/3hq6B2R
    My Social Media:
    / carlbugeja
    / bugejacarl
    / bugeja.carl
    / bugeja.carl
    / carl-bugeja-0b922a135
    Music:
    Coupe - Audio Library
    Fun in the Sun - Audio Library
    Goat - Audio Library
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 266

  • @nasone32
    @nasone32 4 ปีที่แล้ว +102

    You could increase the torque even more, like, A LOT, by putting a piece of iron on top of the rotor, right on the back of the magnets. Brushless motors have so called "back iron" which is the iron ring where the magnets stick to. Yeah that's not alluminium. The magnetic circuit otherwise closes behind the magnets in the air which has a very high reluctance. You can cut such a piece from the iron of an old transformer with big scissors. Since this piece of iron will provide structure you could save part of the gained weight by slimming the aluminium part. This is my field of expertise.

    • @CarlBugeja
      @CarlBugeja  4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Thanks for the tip! I will research this topic further 🙂

    • @revimfadli4666
      @revimfadli4666 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Would it add iron losses? If not, what's the deal with "back ironless" motor designs? And what about Halbach arrays?
      Also, would sandwiching the stator between two rotors be a good idea?

    • @Graham_Wideman
      @Graham_Wideman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@CarlBugeja I agree with nasone32's general idea. Part of the problem is that the magnetic flux generated by one of your windings is weak because most of the path from the north to south of the winding is through the air. So in concept, I think what you want is to equip each winding with a "C" shape iron piece, where the winding and the rotor sit in the gap of the C. The C supplies a much more susceptible path for the coil field, hence the flux is higher. So, a total of six C pieces, one for each winding. This should also mean that when the rotor is spinning, it generates a far higher back-emf, resulting in a lower effective EMF applied to heating the coil. Just the fact that your coils are getting very hot is a sign that a major proportion of the energy you're putting into the coils is not being used to drive the motor. (However, If the motor's stalled, then the windings will get hot by straight I^2 x R anyway, because there's no back emf.)

    • @bgdwiepp
      @bgdwiepp 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@revimfadli4666 it would add very minor losses, the magnetic field at the back of the rotor doesn't change much at all.
      coreless/ironless motors have no material in the stator which sees a very rapidly changing magnetic field, unlike the field in the rotor.
      a halbach array would work, but packaging in such a tight space would be problematic.

    • @revimfadli4666
      @revimfadli4666 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@bgdwiepp I see, thanks!
      What about adding another rotor so the stator gets "sandwiched"? Would that improve the performance?
      And would using a back iron mean adding a Halbach array afterwards basically does nothing?

  • @beurksman
    @beurksman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I can smell a quadcopter business card on the horizon

  • @CyberOne
    @CyberOne 4 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    The delta would be usable with half the voltage.
    Scaling up motors to the industrial scale, 3 phase motors come as user configurable as Star or Delta.
    In Australia, the single phase power is 240Vac while 3 phase is 415Vac.
    When using a single phase to 3 phase inverter to drive a motor, it is normal to connect the motors in the delta config. but when used on the 415Vac 3 phase, we connect them in the star config.
    In your demo, you were using 5V, so there is no reason why it shouldn't work at 2.5V in the delta config.
    Nice job by the way.

  • @makingwithsteve
    @makingwithsteve 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Your work is super cool Carl. Keep it up!

  • @nefariousyawn
    @nefariousyawn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    That was excellent, and I appreciate your sense of humor integrated with the technical information. I wish I found your channel sooner.

  • @simontilstedhansen9296
    @simontilstedhansen9296 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have watched a few of your videos, and I absolutely love them😃 You make videos and projects like no one else keep it up!

  • @marcofe82
    @marcofe82 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Carl, your work is really amazing, especially because you do innovations. Infact your videos, compared with the others, are really mind stimulating. Thank you so much ☺️

    • @CarlBugeja
      @CarlBugeja  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks so much 😊

  • @user-rc4zk8ge1g
    @user-rc4zk8ge1g 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Cool stuff. The first thing that comes to mind in terms of practical applications when seeing this version is the LSU polygon motor in a laser printer. It's a motor that spins up a polygon mirror attached to it. The mirror then deflects the printer's laser beam to make it cycle through the page in a predictable manner.
    I think you'll need at least 15000 RPM for this motor to be practical in that role, and that speed needs to be sustained and incredibly stable. On the upside - no need for high torque whatsoever. With your setup, the mirror and the magnet housing might as well be the same piece, so the only thing the motor would have to spin up is itself.
    The same type of mirror unit can be used in a variety of laser devices, such as laser projectors or LIDAR-like sensors.

  • @LC-ue6mp
    @LC-ue6mp 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are such a pleasure to watch and learn from. We send our best wishes to you.

  • @mikal_1
    @mikal_1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the way you build your motors. *HAMMERS EVERYTHING*

  • @RajendranathBehera
    @RajendranathBehera 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent work. Top of the world technology development. Keep rolling.

  • @padmalayarawal3091
    @padmalayarawal3091 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Superb video as always 🤩. Waiting for its final prototype. Keep it up sir

  • @ELECTRONOOBS
    @ELECTRONOOBS 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Hmm is getting better and better! Good job!

    • @andremicallef6370
      @andremicallef6370 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh my electronoobs on a Maltese video wow wow 😮

    • @moonmatthew
      @moonmatthew 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Only 6 likes after 6 months
      Kinda weird

  • @diamony123
    @diamony123 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    love the fact that you use your skills to create original new stuff, i can relate.

  • @vintyprod
    @vintyprod 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You have a really charming style! Keep it up!

  • @HolmesHobbies
    @HolmesHobbies 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good progress! As stated by others, you need back iron to couple the magnets and complete the magnetic circuit. This will also keep the magnets from being demagnitized as easily.

  • @Nono-hk3is
    @Nono-hk3is 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Impressive work!

  • @mr.e.484
    @mr.e.484 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    #60.
    These motors are very cool and have so many uses. It's hard to find good info about them, so Thanks for making these vids.

  • @Zalo29
    @Zalo29 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good research Carl 👏👏

  • @bob2859
    @bob2859 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Have you considered making increases to the rotor field strength? Would help with coupling and certainly improve efficiency ( = less heating! :D)
    For example, you could put magnets on both side of the stator, or use a Halbach array like Cristoph Laimer's 3d-printed motor.

  • @dmitryrucky381
    @dmitryrucky381 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice work, interesting research

  • @teja9676
    @teja9676 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent job

  • @resenese573
    @resenese573 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really like this project. I'm going to be thanks about tall the possible variations and potential design changes all day now.🤯

  • @dejayrezme8617
    @dejayrezme8617 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome idea! This could also be really interesting to make a linear motor on a PCB. I figure PCB milling should be quite precise enough as a crude linear guide. You could make the coils wider horizontally, add a chip to only power the active coils and maybe add some iron to increase the force. I don't really have much knowledge about motors though.
    This could be cool for something like a stewart platform. 6 legs just with their distance to the ground would define the 6dof position of the robot. So with 8 legs that can freely swing you should be able to make a simple robot that can lift two legs while the other 6 keep is fixed, then move all platofmr, lift 2 legs and let them swing back to vertical.

  • @MrMPod
    @MrMPod 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    great job, keep going and waiting for dron

  • @myrmidon0
    @myrmidon0 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    yeah the new pcb motor look more promising. Good Job !

  • @playbyan1453
    @playbyan1453 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is much look better than last time

  • @tomasbarra433
    @tomasbarra433 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    i love that miller!

  •  4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Smash assembly, I love it!

  • @neilgauci6981
    @neilgauci6981 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video 👌

  • @turtlejr8911
    @turtlejr8911 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It looks more stable than the last one!

  • @m.sierra5258
    @m.sierra5258 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would probably really benefit from a ferromagnetic core in the windings somehow. Maybe with vias and a ground plane? Connecting all the magnets together in a ground plane, to create a closed loop magnetic field. Not having one is like putting resistors in your magnetic field, the field needs something to kling on to.

  • @tomasbarra433
    @tomasbarra433 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    and the coolest diy i've ever seen

  • @servaleravs8036
    @servaleravs8036 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello! Amazing work) What is the layer size of the PCB, the copper layers and isolations for v1 and v3 pcb motors?
    Thanks!)

  • @0111649116
    @0111649116 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Consider that aluminum will have eddy currents through it and consider halbach array of magnets too! Just a thought, don't judge :)

  • @kevinminguy
    @kevinminguy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    i will love to see a video of your setup like which software you use or which tool you recommand :)

  • @xmun9236
    @xmun9236 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Regarding using the back emf as a way to measure the speed, is it actually only dependent on the rotational speed of the motor? (compare results with the actual hall sensor with different loads added to the motor) or is it mainly a function of the input signals?

  • @azimalif266
    @azimalif266 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This channel is underrated.

  • @paulscottpadgett1996
    @paulscottpadgett1996 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Much Respect 💪

  • @pieters286
    @pieters286 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice!, except for adding iron to define magnetic path, maybe also try rotor with no indentation to minimize air resistance or drag, the loss is related to drag and square speed.

  • @Iceteavanill
    @Iceteavanill 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interresting project. I like how you combine electrical engineering with mechanical part design. have you thought of having both of the winding sides accessible like in an classical Induction motor so that you could switch from star to delta at will?

  • @skathiri2608
    @skathiri2608 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes! I've been waiting for another video on pcb motors. Still want to do a pcb drone.

    • @skathiri2608
      @skathiri2608 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Keep up the pcb motor!

    • @skathiri2608
      @skathiri2608 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      An the great and helpful work.

  • @Seizeleo
    @Seizeleo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there any way to add a fan or directional air flow holes into the aluminum to cool the PCB? Maybe in the divots or area between the magnets.
    I know nothing of this just trying to help.

  • @excitedbox5705
    @excitedbox5705 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You can re magnetize the magnets by heating them and exposing them to a magnetic field then cooling them. You can also add a second pcb on the other side of the rotor to double the power of your motor. Just add a longer shaft. That is the beauty of an axial motor.

  • @isettech
    @isettech 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    With a proper driver and commutation using hall sensors, the basics involved are this:
    Current = Torque. Speed = Voltage.
    A proper motor driver will reduce current when the commutation is in phase with no lag, so low heat and high efficiency at all speeds. At higher velocity, the current for the torque remains constant if you ignore friction and induced current loss in the conductive magnets.
    This motor control can be performed with an inefficient class AB analog amplifier/driver to feed the commuted 3 phase drive to the motor using 3 hall sensors and 4 quadrant analog multipliers to generate drive signals to the amplifier which is configured not as a voltage amplifier, but a voltage to current amplifier. Motor drag, is responded with a change of current to maintain the correct speed by adjusting current to change torque. As the motor runs slow or faster, the voltage to current amplifier automatically adjusts voltage based on motor back EMF to apply the correct committed torque at all speeds.
    For higher efficiency, a high speed PWM voltage to current driver can be used instead to produce the 3 phase currents required. If you change from a 3 phase design to a 90 degree 2 phase design, cheap stepper motor drivers can be used to run constant current, thus constant torque and constant heating in the motor at all speeds. Use higher supply voltages for higher maximum speed. To grasp the concepts, stepper motors are inexpensive in smaller sizes along with off the shelf stepper motor drivers. Play with and learn stepper motor driver theory and technology to transfer to your PCB motor designs. You can buy 3 phase versions, but they are less common and more costly.
    www.amazon.com/dp/B00PNEQ79Q?tag=duckduckgo-d-20&linkCode=osi&th=1&psc=1
    Stay away from the arduino stepper H Bridge drivers. They are made for slow speeds such as 3D printers. To learn motor drive and view waveforms, get a real CNC style stepper motor driver.
    www.amazon.com/Usongshine-Stepper-Controller-Leadshine-2-Phase/dp/B07PHLJM22/ref=sr_1_36?dchild=1&keywords=stepper+motor+controller&qid=1592375778&s=electronics&sr=1-36
    You set the desired current in dip switches, and your maximum speed is limited by your maximum voltage used. If 1 Amp is too much, you can buy smaller motor drivers.

  • @MatryxMayhem
    @MatryxMayhem 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So what if you placed two magnet arrays on either side of the PCB? Like a reversed axial brushless motor?

  • @MoritzvonSchweinitz
    @MoritzvonSchweinitz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could you use a couple of vias as a core of the coils? You seem, to already have two vias in the middle, but there seems to be space for a couple more?

  • @proevilz
    @proevilz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    On the metal thing that holds the magnets, couldn't you add some fins to the back of it when it spins to help cool it?

  • @martingerhardt9653
    @martingerhardt9653 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey carl nice work. Really got me some ideas. As tip. Have you considered making the rotor also out of pcb material? From manufacturing its simpler.
    Furthermore i wonder if the motor works also good as a generator. Would you be willed to provide one piece for a test?

  • @santoshmaharana4020
    @santoshmaharana4020 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you please tell about Calculations regarding BLDC Motor design and windings?

  • @martinfinne7259
    @martinfinne7259 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The low resistance of the delta configuration is not a problem, it is necessary for higher speeds but you will need a smarter driver that has current limiting

  • @ytxstream
    @ytxstream 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should use magnetics simulation such as JMAG or Maxwell (expensive) or MotorAnalysis (free) to simulate and optimize your design further.

  • @underourrock
    @underourrock 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Any room for heatsinking the back side of the PCB?
    If you mill another magnet rotor, maybe cut some grooves / fins into it so there is a slight cooling effect without much if any extra drag.

  • @torcek1991
    @torcek1991 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great content! I am wondering how this design would work as a power generator? Maybe this is an idea for another video? Cheers

  • @3dpchiron709
    @3dpchiron709 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could you protect the magnets with a thin layer of thermal insulation? Maybe a paint with aerogel powder or insulating film.

  • @6WTF_MAN9
    @6WTF_MAN9 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you set rotor whis ferromagnetic or magnets on opposite side of coils pcb, it increases torque more then two times.

  • @g.balajibabu919
    @g.balajibabu919 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So amazing

  • @zac_5295
    @zac_5295 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have you thought about designing one with an attachable heat sink? There is an article that seems to talk about how motor performance can be negatively impacted by high heat.
    Maybe you put as many vias in the extra room of the PCB as possible to also help with cooling.

  • @ManiKumar-yg7rc
    @ManiKumar-yg7rc 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super I like your project

  • @GENcELL2014
    @GENcELL2014 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Very interesting! I like the direction this is going.
    Have you considered putting thermal epoxy as a heatsink on rear of pcb where the coil areas are?
    Also you can get magnets that are rated to 125+ celcius. "Polymagnets" can generate greater force than standard magnets, Correlated Magnetics make polymagnets.

    • @klausbrinck2137
      @klausbrinck2137 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      thermal epoxy is there just to fill the gaps between a heat source and an alloy heat sink (cause perfect flat surfaces, that could touch each other with 100% of their expanse, don´t exist), and doesn´t help dissipate heat itself!

    • @GENcELL2014
      @GENcELL2014 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@klausbrinck2137 yes an actual heatsink would be superior with thermal epoxy to bond and provide optimal thermal connection. But thermal properties can be improved with just thermal epoxy, it still wicks heat away fairly quickly and increases surface area.
      Have you seen microcontrollers on a pcb under a pool of set thermal epoxy?
      Thermal epoxy can be cast or overmolded into shapes like normal resin.

    • @userPrehistoricman
      @userPrehistoricman 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      > Have you seen microcontrollers on a pcb under a pool of set thermal epoxy?
      Do you mean the black blobs common in very cheap applications? This isn't for thermals, if's for protecting the die.

  • @xaytana
    @xaytana 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Couple questions. How difficult would it be to implement a halbach array in a design this thin? I realize this would require magnets with more optimal shapes than what off the shelf circular magnets provide. Have you also tried using a rotor on each side of the stator? Most axial flux motors, which this motor is, uses that design; I also know some designs, both single and dual sided, use an iron core on the rotors, where other designs do not, so that might be another thing to look into.

  • @zangarkhan
    @zangarkhan 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder if you could sandwich the rotter between 2 PCBs on top and 2 PCBs on bottom. This will trap your spindle between 2 PCBs on either side (higher stability) . Then use the outer exposed disk for mounting blades to instead of shaft. Might be interesting to do push pull between top and bottom PCBs due to heat. Also if u cut small curved vain into the aluminum you can have it self cool to a point.

  • @mansourhamada
    @mansourhamada 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    That is great work)) would like to see something like this underwater 🤔

  • @S7udio1381
    @S7udio1381 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome!

  • @samuelgidman7264
    @samuelgidman7264 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What milling machine is that you are using? Also Great video

  • @ahoe
    @ahoe 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you put a lot of coils onto a lager pcb, could you make something like a marble track? Or a clock, where the small metal ball shows the time.

  • @TiNredstoner
    @TiNredstoner 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You would need need "Water cooled PCB motor" 😂

  • @digitalmunky
    @digitalmunky 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about creating the rotor with fins, to aid cooling & prevent overheating of the magnets? Also, have you looked into graphite as a washer option?...

  • @tinkerduck1373
    @tinkerduck1373 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about the Eddy currents in the aluminium part? Wouldn't they create drag?

  • @polisminus9138
    @polisminus9138 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Quality Content

  • @raykent3211
    @raykent3211 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video and loads of interesting comments. But was I the only one alarmed at the figure of 80C in the spec of the magnets? I'm aware of the Curie point and that hot magnets lose their power, but never thought it was that low. If I simmer a neodymium magnet in water at near 100C for an hour will it become useless?

  • @ianproffitt3679
    @ianproffitt3679 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    would thinner magnets ether side of the PCB work better?

  • @RowanBink
    @RowanBink 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have you thought of using something like an odrive to turn you motors into tiny precision "stepper ish" motors? 🤔 (would that work?)

  • @nipunlokuwithanage3433
    @nipunlokuwithanage3433 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    consider changing the magnet housing to a non-conductive material (other than plastic of course) or use laminated sheets of aluminium epoxied together perpendicular to the pcb. the eddy currents in the housing is giving issues with heat and sapping a lot of the power. adding iron would make this worse. iron is only good for flux coupling and since the magnets are already so close the coils there is no point. any additional metal on the rotor would do little to the flux linkage other than leak power. iron is usually used around coils to help concentrate the flux into a particular axis. around magnets not much happens. consider stiffer thermo-setting plastics such as delrin if possible. delrin is easy to machine even on small mills and lathes.

  • @toofsman
    @toofsman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Very cool work. Just wondering if the switch to using aluminum for the rotor causes eddy currents, and if that might reduce the efficiency of the motor?

    • @CarlBugeja
      @CarlBugeja  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks! Hmm 🤔 very good question.. I don't think eddy currents will reduce the efficiency with regards to speed and torque.. But in reality they might be also getting generated in the bearing and shaft... That is one of the reasons why I prefer this over the old design because the bearing is now inside the rotor and not directly underneath the rotor's magnets

    • @TurkishLoserInc
      @TurkishLoserInc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@CarlBugeja I actually did research in electrodynamic wheels(basically a wheel with circumferencially oriented magnets in a halbach array). We found that all metallic objects created a large eddy current that opposes the field of the magnets. The magnetic field generated in the aluminum will have a phase to the magnetic field of the magnets passing over it, such that as your RPM increases, you will double up or divide your magnetic field strength. Using PVC is a much better idea.
      blogs.nvcc.edu/intercom/2014/03/24/majewskis-students-win-research-competition/

    • @Scrogan
      @Scrogan 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh good thinking there, it’s probably why the magnets got so hot. I’d expect the rotor to remain cold. Perhaps make a silicone mould of the milled rotor and pour in some epoxy, maybe with glass beads or fibres for reinforcement.

    • @InfinionExperiments
      @InfinionExperiments 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@TurkishLoserInc Yeah the aluminum will definitely produce eddies from the magnetic fields and generate heat + counter-torque from their induced currents, this is why motors are produced in laminated sheets. The only question is how much drag and heat is being generated at these magnetic flux levels.
      You could figure out how much drag there was experimentally by changing the rotor back to plastic or milled carbon fiber and measure the RPM differences between it and the aluminum rotor, and you could test if the heat was the result of eddies or the PCB by literally heating the PCB with DC current (no eddies) through the coils while the rotor is stationary, and see if that heat can make its way through the bearings and shaft and get the rotor past 80°C. If it can't, then heating must be coming from eddy current losses.

    • @toofsman
      @toofsman 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CarlBugeja I can see that it might not have much effect at this scale but if scaled up it might factor in. also something to note is that the magnetic fields in the permanent magnets are a lot stronger than the electromagnets, and the fields from the electromagnets are the ones that will induce the eddy currents. so they should not be a concern.

  • @bipolarchemist
    @bipolarchemist 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice work on thinning out the PCB and getting a higher RPM. And were those shafts were a type of pogo pin? They certainly looked like pogo pins and that was a genius use for them.

    • @CarlBugeja
      @CarlBugeja  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks! It's not a pogo pin, just a single pin connector 🙂

  • @simona625
    @simona625 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I know this is an old vid... however, try to incorporate fan blades into the rotor to try cooling the PCB

  • @FIXDIY
    @FIXDIY 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good

  • @whatelseison8970
    @whatelseison8970 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    To get the most out of your magnets you need to confine their flux to pass through the stator as much as possible. To achieve this you should use a magnetically permeable material (a steel washer perhaps?) to back the rotor and make the rotor double sided.
    If you could source them, halbach arrays would be ideal. Not sure how realistic that is at this scale.. Trapezoidal or sector magnets would also let you use the space under the disc more efficiently. Maybe you can get the HDD magnets from an oldschool iPod or something.
    Given the choice of using more of the space you have for magnets or just a higher grade, more magnetic material is usually the way to go. imho.

  • @ManoBiletsky
    @ManoBiletsky 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    You could also stack 2 coil pcb's on top of each other, increasing the torque by 175%?

    • @Johennessy
      @Johennessy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Nice idea. He should defently try it. U could use it as the main structure of the drone as well. I can already see the design :)

    • @ronniepirtlejr2606
      @ronniepirtlejr2606 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was thinking the same thing. 1 on each side of the magnet. Or 2 on each side of the magnet!

  • @kedarprabhudessai
    @kedarprabhudessai 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You get 100 likes from me..!!! Keep it up brother 🙂👌👌

  • @qnaman
    @qnaman 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing

  • @Lizlodude
    @Lizlodude 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    There's the right way to set a bearing with a nice press that doesn't put undue stress on the bearing, and then there's they way everyone actually does it, which is HAMMER :D

  • @Blubb3rbub
    @Blubb3rbub 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting and fascinating.
    I personally would like to see some simulation of the generated magnetic field. Maybe one can throw an optimizer at the shape of the spirals to optimize the generated field? From the previous video it looked like you choose the shape quite arbitrary? I would be surprised if the shape wouldn't have a big influence over the power output of the motor. But i'm just a commenter on the internet that doesn't really know much about that topic, so...

  • @billnopost1594
    @billnopost1594 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good genius! 👍

  • @codebeat4192
    @codebeat4192 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like to use such motor in a cassette tape housing (on a custom PCB inside) that turns the wheels or use one of them as generator to drive the second wheel. The magnets are in the surroundings of the wheels and coils are around the holes. The reason I want to do this is to make BT-adapter without noisy rotating gears. Some cassettedecks requires the motion of both wheels, that is why there are gears inside such adapter. It would be fantastic when this can be done without batteries at all, so when one wheel is driven by the cassettedeck, the other automaticly spins (slower of course due energy loss). That would be amazing! A nice application, right? (or stupid idea?)

  • @TEENASPECT
    @TEENASPECT 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Try to add magnets at different side of pcb for more torque. And sure avoid the high temperature. Also try to insert copper inside of pcd. It's a multilayer pcb like used in graphical card where we have more than 7 layers.

    • @excitedbox5705
      @excitedbox5705 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      he already has multiple layers connected with vias. You are right though about stacking. He should stack a stator on the other side of the rotor though so that the magnets are acted on from both sides.

    • @TEENASPECT
      @TEENASPECT 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@excitedbox5705 I saw only two layers by two sides of pcb plate. Need more)

    • @CarlBugeja
      @CarlBugeja  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is actually 4 layers 🙂

  • @strongest8359
    @strongest8359 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very intrasting! You powerfull )

  • @patrickfle9172
    @patrickfle9172 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did you consider making the rotor out of sheet steel to work as a back connector for the magnetic field? Or using a double rotor with the pcb sandwiched inbetween to build an axial flux motor? Both variations might result in stronger magnetic fields and thus higher torque

    • @CarlBugeja
      @CarlBugeja  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The steel option I believe would reduce the speed of the motor (which was the main goal) but as you said it will also improve the torque.. So I might consider it for some other applications

  • @user-yb5ji9cx8x
    @user-yb5ji9cx8x 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi, I have a question. did you calculate the round(revolution) per sec for both of the delta and star form?
    what's the highest rpm for them?

  • @lucatosatti7071
    @lucatosatti7071 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    2:01 "GIMME PCB!!"
    Ehi for the heat, what about a little fan (maybe in plastic) on the back of the motor pcb? The height increases, but the performance will decrease less.
    Or maybe a different design of the rotor: fan shaped, so it will cool itself without any other extra parts.

  • @hassaization
    @hassaization 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's that little cnc youre using? it's cute

  • @xinrainc
    @xinrainc 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Impressive

  • @SurinderSingh-fq2mv
    @SurinderSingh-fq2mv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Keep on with the force don't stop don't stop till you get enough 🤘 love you 😚😚😘😚

  • @ABaumstumpf
    @ABaumstumpf 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Costs a bit more, but use a 4-layer (or more) PCB, and maybe some iron-covers around the backside of the coils.

  • @isaaccarrillo5391
    @isaaccarrillo5391 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome

  • @maneeshs3876
    @maneeshs3876 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could you please share a video using PCB motors in order to achieve similar functionality as that of celluveyor

  • @hummel911
    @hummel911 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    N1! Whats about closed loop magnetic circuit? So as far as i see, the motor is not using a closed magnetic circuit. Like a classic electric machine.

  • @laureven
    @laureven 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome Idea :) , next step is to build smallest PCB step motor and next 3d printer from them, and next print small 3d printed engine :)

  • @nitashachauhan4455
    @nitashachauhan4455 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Carl,can we make this pcb motor in larger size for evs