It's too late, but I'll say it anyway... I was struck by the illogical oral argument from Paul Clement, the solicitor general, and a while back from Brown Jackson too. In Moody, Paul Clement kept repeating "They gave my clients immunity from third-party content liability in order to encourage my clients to censor that third-party content" (paraphrased). THAT'S SO STUPID. Apparently Mr Clement thought repeating that NONSENSE over and over again would somehow make it true. Of course it's the opposite... Shielding his clients from liability for third-party content does not encourage censorship of that content, AT ALL.
4:12 She slips into an uncanny impression of Justice Kagan as she reads her quote from the majority opinion. She captures Kagan's mannerisms and affectations brilliantly. I'm not even sure if she did that intentionally or was even aware that she did it. But the first time I was listening to this I wasn't really paying attention to the video and as she read that quote, just for a second, I really thought they had cut to a clip of Justice Kagan actually reading out that portion of the opinion.
![เปิดใจ "อาจารย์เบียร์ คนตื่นธรรม" อดีตเคยสุดทุกทาง ถ้าใช้หนี้หมดไปบวชแน่ l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IxeE0xVhy08/mqdefault.jpg)
It's too late, but I'll say it anyway...
I was struck by the illogical oral argument from Paul Clement, the solicitor general, and a while back from Brown Jackson too. In Moody, Paul Clement kept repeating "They gave my clients immunity from third-party content liability in order to encourage my clients to censor that third-party content" (paraphrased). THAT'S SO STUPID. Apparently Mr Clement thought repeating that NONSENSE over and over again would somehow make it true. Of course it's the opposite... Shielding his clients from liability for third-party content does not encourage censorship of that content, AT ALL.
4:12 She slips into an uncanny impression of Justice Kagan as she reads her quote from the majority opinion. She captures Kagan's mannerisms and affectations brilliantly. I'm not even sure if she did that intentionally or was even aware that she did it. But the first time I was listening to this I wasn't really paying attention to the video and as she read that quote, just for a second, I really thought they had cut to a clip of Justice Kagan actually reading out that portion of the opinion.