Oh my gosh thank you so much for mentioning the Wilhelm scream. I have ALWAYS wondered about that sound effect and wanted to research its origins but didn't know what to call it! I feel so satisfied right now.
I feel kind of sad. This movie has a lot of elements I really enjoy: 1700s, swashbuckling, grey-morality main characters...but I feel like it really failed to meet it's potential. Also, I like stories about the American Revolution (being a Canadian, I'm not as overly familiar with the history as some might be, so it's kind of fresh) but I always feel like they're very over the top patriotic, although I suppose that goes with any country pivotal historical event.
I swear the main character looks like a homeschooled Christian version of Brad Pitt. That's literally what his face reminds me of....and I don't know why.
"So he takes him to his playroom, and I don't mean the room with his x-box" *50 shades music plays* Wow, Kevin that's not very appropriate for a CHRISTIAN review.
Not sure if anyone gives a shit but if you are bored like me atm then you can stream pretty much all the latest movies and series on InstaFlixxer. Have been streaming with my gf for the last couple of days :)
I'd actually watch a movie about an American Revolution-based Batman/Zorro-inspired vigilante working to defeat undercover plots by the King. Shame this movie has other ideas.
About the fake salvation scene, YES, it bothered me SO MUCH when I watched this movie that he was able to immediately become a devout Christian, it's not that easy or instantaneous. God does help us find Him again, but we still need to work at doing so and learning about Him rather than go from no faith to amazingly faithful in 0.5 seconds.
It depends on whether or not the seed has already been planted and watered by someone else. Remember, this guy had been "preaching" for months. As a result, even though he was not a believer, he had been reading/studying the Word on a regular basis in order to give a sermon. He had also been spending a lot of time with a godly woman who was encouraging him in his walk and showing him unconditional love. Besides, now that I'm thinking about it, I don't think we can put God in a box and say what He can and can't do. The faith to believe doesn't come from us; it comes from God and He's the one who chooses how to save someone. I'm quite sure that there are Christians who were "instantaneously" saved.
To be fair, I'm pretty sure everything Ben Franklin said in real life was a wink to the audience about a future he couldn't have known about yet unless his Deist God revealed it to him.
I'm always hesitant when it comes to independent films, but, as someone who was homeschooled, I was even more hesitant (my mind kept being dragged to the many homeschool-shaming conversations I have overheard). Thank you for this video! I watched this video just a couple weeks ago (after watching your video) and the family loved it!
I really appreciate your point at 26:32... It's such an important moment in a persons life that we can't cheapen it with a quick moment. Sure, not everyones salvation story won't be epic and really cool (mine surely wasnt), we can't give a formula or make it seem like it's something else when it's not...
5 years later, I came back to rewatch this review. I have in the last couple of years been learning about historical fashion and common period drama mistakes, and now some things really stick out in the film. Am I going to bash a small film's limited-budget costumes? Yes, yes I am because I'm petty and nothing fun is open in summer 2020. 1. Charlotte's hair should not be down in public. She is a grown woman, hair should be up in a quite ridiculously voluminous updo. Can be easily achieved by wrapping hair around a wig stuffed into a hair net. And definitely not in 2010s beach waves. 2. Modern day make-up is very obvious on Charlotte. Appropriate make-up for the time would have been rice powder to make the face appear paler (lead powder was actually discouraged because of its toxicity), a hint of rouge for the cheeks, and charcoal for shaping eyebrows. Looks odd to us today, but really makes it look 18th century. 3. Wigs look like they were obtained from Party City or Amazon- they're too shiny and polyester-looking. Cheap, mass-produced wigs maybe could be used if baby powder/baking powder was used on them. Also more grey wigs could be used, with white powder to really sell it as an authentic wig. Powder does get on the clothing (as it would have at the time) and adds another expense, but small details work wonders when trying to make the characters look like they belong to the time period. I'm probably being too hard on the film though. Trying to make actors look like they're "built in the 18th century" (as Karolina Zebrowska puts it) and not just actors in historical costumes, especially on budget is really tricky, and even big movie studios get it wrong a lot (I'm looking at you, Uggs in 2019 Little Women).
There’s one thing I’d like to mention about something you said. When Will and Joshua Brand were fighting in the shed, Will did not kill Joshua. Joshua slipped on the floor and fell, thus hitting his head on the fireplace. It was an accidental death.
I've never seen this movie but I loved your review! It kept me laughing the entire time. The funniest part was when you said "What's he wearing?!" Because I said the exact same thing right before! 😄😄
I saw this a few months ago! I was hoping you'd get your hands on it. I was overall impressed despite some flaws. I actually went to an acting workshop presentation by the guy that plays the main character, where someone said he was "the Christian version of Brad Pitt." (Why is there a Christian version of everything??) 5:45 is the reason I watch this channel.
The East India Company is a fascinating topic, but his movie does it no justice. It was virtually the first multinational corporation, and was so powerful that it commanded a Navy. In fact, at its height, in todays dollars it would be worth several trillion dollars, which is bigger than any company that's ever existed. This film, however, is not interested in history or, you know, the ay real people comport themselves. . And unfortunately as John Rhys Davis has become more religious, he has said some very offensive remarks about immigration in Europe. Another reason people think that piousness and tolerance are mutually exclusive.
+Geoffrey Zoref Dude, RIGHT? When I was working on this review, I did a bunch of research about it and it was so interesting. It made me actually want to see a movie about it. It was crazy. They owned a large majority of Parlement, and were essentially a corporate entity acting as the government and even using government resources to control it's interests. The Revolutionary War was, in many ways, fought against the EIC. Sounds a bit like the monopoly corporation that is the US government today. haha. There are even theories, which I'm sure Nick Cage will do a movie about one day, that the US government actually IS the EIC, which went under, right around the time of the rebuilding of the US government after the Civil War! Now, those theories are usually presented in videos that closely resemble the intro to The X-files, but still, it's much more compelling than this movie!
I liked Beyond the Mask. But you do make some good points. I was confused with the script a lot. But the graphics\cinematography seemed really good for a low budget film. Thanks for the good review!
Hey, fun fact: the actress who plays Charlotte also plays a paramedic in Chicago Fire. And honestly she might be one of the few reasons (beyond John Rhys-Davies) why I would watch this movie. I find her very attractive.
Hey Kevin, I've heard people harp on voice overs (especially when a movie opens with one) before, and not that I disagree, but why exactly? Is it just because it's more cliche, or is there a larger reason? I'm just curious and thought it would be nice to hear it explained in full. Great video as always!
In different kinds mediums, you have to use different types of writing, in order to tell the story to your audience. In books, you can go into great detail, because you have the narrative voice speaking directly to the audience. But you don't have pictures (typically). Audio drama, you struggle with different environments and locations. As every new place, must be identified in the dialogue without the actors saying, "and now we are going into this new room." With stage, a whole different set of limitations. With film, you have a saying, "show, don't tell". It is important to tell your story in a creative way, in order to draw your audience into the story, and to avoid reminding them that they are watching a movie. Voice over can be used very creatively. (Martin Scorsese is a great example of this). However, usually, voice over is, for lack of a better term, a cop out. Used to avoid creative dialogue, which can provide crucial character development. Instead of someone turning to the audience and saying, "I'm the one you're supposed to identify with" it can be much more beneficial to guide your audience into drawing that conclusion for themselves.
Love your blasting of John Rhys Davies alliteration, the annoying mask metaphors and the random twists and turns of the plot. This is my favorite episode of yours yet lol. I thought this movie was okay, personally. Also, am I the only one who noticed...A psychopathic assassin who quits the business, gets double crossed by his boss, comes back a vigilante and learns the value of mercy? Am I the only one who feels the plot of this film is reminiscent of a more lighthearted, colonial version, REALLY rushed version of Spawn without all the Hell/Demonic/Unded themes or any of the personal tragedy? Actually, come to think of it, you might be able to make a pretty sweet Christian movie out of Spawn; an assassin damned to Hell, sacrificing everything he ever wanted and desired in the name of love, finding the value of mercy and redemption through Christ and Heaven and his newfound love of God even after all he's done and his existence as a Hellspawn? That Christian movie would ROCK IMO. If done right, it could actually be really touching and uplifting IMO.
One thing you forgot! The modesty double standard. The women were all dressed very modestly, but the lead male was shown with his shirt off and in a sleeveless shirt. ;)
Just because he has his shirt off, doesn't make him gay. If you're a guy doing a lot of hard labor on a very hot day, sometimes you have to take off your shirt. Anyway, what does it matter if a person is gay?
My family loved this movie so much when it came out at our theater, and I was really excited to see it when Mom bought it. *sigh* it was such a disappointment. While we were watching that England love story part I was just thinking "Jane Austen?" the whole time.
just watched this movie and totally agree with your take on it. I thought the cinematography and visuals were great! However, I was completely confused by the story and dialogue the whole time. You left out the part where the uncle tells his men to kill his niece if she "so much as visits wills grave" and I'm like "what! I wasn't convinced he was THAT evil. didn't make sense.
"DO YOU GET IT YET? MASKS!" ugh its the same problem that I had with that other movie you reviewed that had the crosses in it. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SUBTLE IMAGERY AND JUST, WHATEVER THIS IS.
+Firecycle HAHAHAHA. I didn't remember this part, and then I checked and was like, "What is this person talking about, that's clearly me....oh, I get it now"
+Say Goodnight Kevin I think Paul is great writer. That being said he writes mostly audio dramas, of I'm not mistaken. Not saying he can't cross over, it's just a little different at form.
I had a class in high school with the writers son, and he was all excited about the mvie and his dads script, and then I read the World Mag. review and was like oh.... that's too bad. I think they need to release another Bonhoeffer film, and these guys could probably do it well.
They marketed this very hard to homeschoolers as something you can use with your history... We went to the screening, and I was surprised to see someone handing out tracts to all the attendees, which I thought was rather hilarious as it was heavily marketed to Christian homeschoolers.
Because I’m that person: Crown oversight of the East India Company only really started in 1787, but control over India’s government didn’t pass into Crown hands until 1858. Until then, the looting of India’s wealth was still very much a corporate affair. This is not to say the Crown Raj was better for India’s people, only that the Crown wasn’t to blame at this point in time. You (and the movie) are a little ahead of yourself, is all. 😉
Oh my gosh thank you so much for mentioning the Wilhelm scream. I have ALWAYS wondered about that sound effect and wanted to research its origins but didn't know what to call it! I feel so satisfied right now.
I feel kind of sad. This movie has a lot of elements I really enjoy: 1700s, swashbuckling, grey-morality main characters...but I feel like it really failed to meet it's potential. Also, I like stories about the American Revolution (being a Canadian, I'm not as overly familiar with the history as some might be, so it's kind of fresh) but I always feel like they're very over the top patriotic, although I suppose that goes with any country pivotal historical event.
I swear the main character looks like a homeschooled Christian version of Brad Pitt. That's literally what his face reminds me of....and I don't know why.
Or the lead singer of Disciple.
He reminds me of a Stuido character for some reason
He reminds me of a Russian actor called Oleg Menshikov.
Looks like a discount Jaime Lannister to me personally
"So he takes him to his playroom, and I don't mean the room with his x-box" *50 shades music plays* Wow, Kevin that's not very appropriate for a CHRISTIAN review.
It's CHRISTIIIIIAAAAAAAN!!!
There will never be a movie that can say "mask" without me thinking of The Phantom of the Opera
Marinelife7 / were your parents accepting of your "alternative lifestyle?"
+Justin Booker No, I've been abandoned. I now live under an opera house, where I tutor a young chorus girl.
Marinelife7 careful of those chandeliers. ive heard they fall from time to time.
'we're not sure why he's doing it, but he's doing it.....IN SLOW MOTION" I think that's one of the best things I've ever heard
I have _adored_ this show since you launched it (under a different name) many moons ago. Keep it up!
Not sure if anyone gives a shit but if you are bored like me atm then you can stream pretty much all the latest movies and series on InstaFlixxer. Have been streaming with my gf for the last couple of days :)
@Bruno Joey yup, I've been using Instaflixxer for since december myself :)
I didn’t realize Moses was in this! The black guy by Ben Franklin is Moses from liberty kids!
"And then... the rapture happened." 😂😂 I'm dead
I'd actually watch a movie about an American Revolution-based Batman/Zorro-inspired vigilante working to defeat undercover plots by the King. Shame this movie has other ideas.
Assassin Creed 3
When you referenced Les Miserables, all I thought is that is THAT movie is a better salvation story than this movie.
Truth.
Not to mention the original Brick.
About the fake salvation scene, YES, it bothered me SO MUCH when I watched this movie that he was able to immediately become a devout Christian, it's not that easy or instantaneous. God does help us find Him again, but we still need to work at doing so and learning about Him rather than go from no faith to amazingly faithful in 0.5 seconds.
It depends on whether or not the seed has already been planted and watered by someone else. Remember, this guy had been "preaching" for months. As a result, even though he was not a believer, he had been reading/studying the Word on a regular basis in order to give a sermon. He had also been spending a lot of time with a godly woman who was encouraging him in his walk and showing him unconditional love. Besides, now that I'm thinking about it, I don't think we can put God in a box and say what He can and can't do. The faith to believe doesn't come from us; it comes from God and He's the one who chooses how to save someone. I'm quite sure that there are Christians who were "instantaneously" saved.
Pretty interesting how Kevin turned into Bad Lip Reading at 18:11
*sits down to study for major test tonight*. *sees a new saymovienightkevin* *throws books out the window* yep. its that good.
"We then cut to Downton Abbey"
To be fair, I'm pretty sure everything Ben Franklin said in real life was a wink to the audience about a future he couldn't have known about yet unless his Deist God revealed it to him.
The Fresh Prince reference :) and the extraHahahah! Great job Kevin!
I hate when stories expect you to get attached to the characters through a monologue. It just makes you bored.
I'm always hesitant when it comes to independent films, but, as someone who was homeschooled, I was even more hesitant (my mind kept being dragged to the many homeschool-shaming conversations I have overheard). Thank you for this video! I watched this video just a couple weeks ago (after watching your video) and the family loved it!
Same here! 😂
I JUST WATCHED THIS TWO DAYS AGO AND I WAS THINKING THE WHOLE TIME, WHAT WOULD KEVIN SAYYYY
BONANZA REFERENCE
John Ruhs kinda looks like smoky bear...
I really appreciate your point at 26:32...
It's such an important moment in a persons life that we can't cheapen it with a quick moment. Sure, not everyones salvation story won't be epic and really cool (mine surely wasnt), we can't give a formula or make it seem like it's something else when it's not...
5 years later, I came back to rewatch this review. I have in the last couple of years been learning about historical fashion and common period drama mistakes, and now some things really stick out in the film. Am I going to bash a small film's limited-budget costumes? Yes, yes I am because I'm petty and nothing fun is open in summer 2020.
1. Charlotte's hair should not be down in public. She is a grown woman, hair should be up in a quite ridiculously voluminous updo. Can be easily achieved by wrapping hair around a wig stuffed into a hair net. And definitely not in 2010s beach waves.
2. Modern day make-up is very obvious on Charlotte. Appropriate make-up for the time would have been rice powder to make the face appear paler (lead powder was actually discouraged because of its toxicity), a hint of rouge for the cheeks, and charcoal for shaping eyebrows. Looks odd to us today, but really makes it look 18th century.
3. Wigs look like they were obtained from Party City or Amazon- they're too shiny and polyester-looking. Cheap, mass-produced wigs maybe could be used if baby powder/baking powder was used on them. Also more grey wigs could be used, with white powder to really sell it as an authentic wig. Powder does get on the clothing (as it would have at the time) and adds another expense, but small details work wonders when trying to make the characters look like they belong to the time period.
I'm probably being too hard on the film though. Trying to make actors look like they're "built in the 18th century" (as Karolina Zebrowska puts it) and not just actors in historical costumes, especially on budget is really tricky, and even big movie studios get it wrong a lot (I'm looking at you, Uggs in 2019 Little Women).
I'm a fan of Jane Austen-esque romances, but the romance in this story really drags the film
"Give me your hand!" "But I need my hand!"
This is an awesome video. Keep making this, they're better every time!
Oh wow, Underoath reference! That brings back memories.
There’s one thing I’d like to mention about something you said. When Will and Joshua Brand were fighting in the shed, Will did not kill Joshua. Joshua slipped on the floor and fell, thus hitting his head on the fireplace. It was an accidental death.
"This bar must be the youtube comments section of colonial times." - Best. Line. Ever.
Pro Tip: Don't eat things while watching Kevin's reviews. I nearly choked on a Butterfinger at the ad lib lines for the extras. LOL...
I remember having cranberry juice come out of my nose one time I was watching one of Kevin's reviews because I was laughing so hard.
Good times.
Would you review Pendragon too? I'd love to see that MovieNight episode! :D
When you played the Dark Night part I got the goose pimples
+PersianMonkeyStudios I DID TOO WHEN I WAS EDITING! Finding that part, I was like, "Holy cow, this is such a good movie!"
Wow, Kevin, that was practically a positive review for you! I don't usually watch movie reviews, but you make me laugh, so bravo for that.
18:40 and 18:55 were probably the funniest things I've heard all day. They literally made me lol. Bravo, Kevin, bravo!
When the fall from the dock:
``Beyond the Mask, by Nicholas Sparks!'' :D
“I’ve told you threece!” 😂😂😂
That rigoletto piece was on point! I love that movie!
"Then we have this missed opportunity to use the Wilhelm scream"
Oh yeah, I forgot Luther and Amazing Grace existed. Those are good Christian Movies. I like both of them.
I've never seen this movie but I loved your review! It kept me laughing the entire time. The funniest part was when you said "What's he wearing?!" Because I said the exact same thing right before! 😄😄
**insert obligatory "good night, Kevin" comment here** :)
+SimGunther okay a little too beefy.
Ethan Walker sorry. :P
SimGunther it was more of a burgie reference.
Beyond The Mask and Divergent are my favorite movies and you made a MovieNight on them!!!!
18:11 I was dying 😂
He looks like Ronnie Howard at the time he was in Happy Days. So that was an extra laugh there.
33:56 Even though it reaks of Pirates of the Caribbean sometimes.
That knock off Pirates of the Caribbean music doo!
Kevin: "The TARDIS"
Me: "ITS DOCTOR WHOOOOOO!"
William Reynolds looks like a discount Malcolm Reynolds.
This guy deserves more subscribers!Good Job Kevin!
I saw this a few months ago! I was hoping you'd get your hands on it. I was overall impressed despite some flaws. I actually went to an acting workshop presentation by the guy that plays the main character, where someone said he was "the Christian version of Brad Pitt." (Why is there a Christian version of everything??)
5:45 is the reason I watch this channel.
I do enormously enjoy this movie despite its inaccuracies
It is our families number one choice for movie night because it is just super enjoyable.
16:19 Did you realize that youtube would insert an ad RIGHT when you said "and now a word from our sponsors"?
Another great episode! I started supporting you on Patreon because these are just too good to be free.
I'm honored!
I love movies like this about old times. 1800s, etc.
you know, the more I watch it, the more I really like this movie
laughed so hard at "and she'll be naked" lol pirates of the Caribbean
Great review, as usual. Can't wait for Say Music Night Kevin.
That Couch Tomato crossover was beautiful 👌
The East India Company is a fascinating topic, but his movie does it no justice. It was virtually the first multinational corporation, and was so powerful that it commanded a Navy. In fact, at its height, in todays dollars it would be worth several trillion dollars, which is bigger than any company that's ever existed.
This film, however, is not interested in history or, you know, the ay real people comport themselves. . And unfortunately as John Rhys Davis has become more religious, he has said some very offensive remarks about immigration in Europe. Another reason people think that piousness and tolerance are mutually exclusive.
+Geoffrey Zoref Dude, RIGHT? When I was working on this review, I did a bunch of research about it and it was so interesting. It made me actually want to see a movie about it. It was crazy. They owned a large majority of Parlement, and were essentially a corporate entity acting as the government and even using government resources to control it's interests. The Revolutionary War was, in many ways, fought against the EIC. Sounds a bit like the monopoly corporation that is the US government today. haha.
There are even theories, which I'm sure Nick Cage will do a movie about one day, that the US government actually IS the EIC, which went under, right around the time of the rebuilding of the US government after the Civil War!
Now, those theories are usually presented in videos that closely resemble the intro to The X-files, but still, it's much more compelling than this movie!
+Geoffrey Zoref , I hope you understand that this film is entirely Fiction... So it really don't matter how they make the East India company look.
Selachii Studio / you'd have to possess an IQ of below 40 to not know this is fiction
This is one of my favorite reviews you've done. Can't wait to see what Musicnight is like :)
I liked Beyond the Mask. But you do make some good points. I was confused with the script a lot. But the graphics\cinematography seemed really good for a low budget film. Thanks for the good review!
22:36 Ah. PennFylvania, my favorite American Ftate. I'm feriouf!
(Yef, i know that'f how they fpelled s-es back then, but it's still funny to me :) )
Hey now, don't dis Jane Austin. :P
This was so fun to watch!
Hey, fun fact: the actress who plays Charlotte also plays a paramedic in Chicago Fire. And honestly she might be one of the few reasons (beyond John Rhys-Davies) why I would watch this movie. I find her very attractive.
I loved this review!!!
Hey Kevin, I've heard people harp on voice overs (especially when a movie opens with one) before, and not that I disagree, but why exactly? Is it just because it's more cliche, or is there a larger reason? I'm just curious and thought it would be nice to hear it explained in full. Great video as always!
In different kinds mediums, you have to use different types of writing, in order to tell the story to your audience. In books, you can go into great detail, because you have the narrative voice speaking directly to the audience. But you don't have pictures (typically). Audio drama, you struggle with different environments and locations. As every new place, must be identified in the dialogue without the actors saying, "and now we are going into this new room." With stage, a whole different set of limitations. With film, you have a saying, "show, don't tell". It is important to tell your story in a creative way, in order to draw your audience into the story, and to avoid reminding them that they are watching a movie. Voice over can be used very creatively. (Martin Scorsese is a great example of this). However, usually, voice over is, for lack of a better term, a cop out. Used to avoid creative dialogue, which can provide crucial character development. Instead of someone turning to the audience and saying, "I'm the one you're supposed to identify with" it can be much more beneficial to guide your audience into drawing that conclusion for themselves.
+Say Goodnight Kevin That makes so much sense, I totally understand it now! Thanks, man!
+Say Goodnight Kevin The moment you said a word from our sponsors 'I had an ad appear
Love your blasting of John Rhys Davies alliteration, the annoying mask metaphors and the random twists and turns of the plot. This is my favorite episode of yours yet lol. I thought this movie was okay, personally.
Also, am I the only one who noticed...A psychopathic assassin who quits the business, gets double crossed by his boss, comes back a vigilante and learns the value of mercy? Am I the only one who feels the plot of this film is reminiscent of a more lighthearted, colonial version, REALLY rushed version of Spawn without all the Hell/Demonic/Unded themes or any of the personal tragedy?
Actually, come to think of it, you might be able to make a pretty sweet Christian movie out of Spawn; an assassin damned to Hell, sacrificing everything he ever wanted and desired in the name of love, finding the value of mercy and redemption through Christ and Heaven and his newfound love of God even after all he's done and his existence as a Hellspawn? That Christian movie would ROCK IMO. If done right, it could actually be really touching and uplifting IMO.
One thing you forgot! The modesty double standard. The women were all dressed very modestly, but the lead male was shown with his shirt off and in a sleeveless shirt. ;)
Jen Jeanette / next time just say "dressed like a gay pirate"
That would have been a better movie.
Just because he has his shirt off, doesn't make him gay.
If you're a guy doing a lot of hard labor on a very hot day, sometimes you have to take off your shirt.
Anyway, what does it matter if a person is gay?
My family loved this movie so much when it came out at our theater, and I was really excited to see it when Mom bought it. *sigh* it was such a disappointment. While we were watching that England love story part I was just thinking "Jane Austen?" the whole time.
That's the worst Ben Franklin I've ever seen.
So is the Highwayman supposed to be like Colonial Batman?
So many good one liners lol
just watched this movie and totally agree with your take on it. I thought the cinematography and visuals were great! However, I was completely confused by the story and dialogue the whole time. You left out the part where the uncle tells his men to kill his niece if she "so much as visits wills grave" and I'm like "what! I wasn't convinced he was THAT evil. didn't make sense.
Oh my favorite movie!!!
"We're not sure why he's doing it, but he's doing it. In slow-motion." Gold.
That Couch Tomato bit was cool man.
That underoath cut hahahaha hell yeah 🤘🏼🤘🏼
"DO YOU GET IT YET? MASKS!"
ugh its the same problem that I had with that other movie you reviewed that had the crosses in it. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SUBTLE IMAGERY AND JUST, WHATEVER THIS IS.
I can’t tell if, at times, the movie plays a rip-off score of Pirates of the Caribbean, or of Kevin added in the actual score during editing.
YES. Just. YES. I loved everything about this. Fantastic job. : ) (Now, excuse me as I go re-watch it...)
I can't wait to see what Kevin thinks about War Room!
Another great review! I like it when you say both good and bad things about the movies. It shows you're not just a hater.
@abby foreman OH, is that where that's from? Innocent mistake.
+Say Goodnight Kevin +Abby Foreman Between the two of you, I can't tell who is/are sincere and who is/are sarcastic.
So long as we're pointing out mistakes, they're the Charlotte Hornets now. **ding**
Troy Wullbrandt Lol. I know silly goose. :-P that's the joke.
Kevin! Your review of do you believe was taken down!
I KNOW! I guess these "christians" can't take a little criticism.
this review is great! and couch tomato thrown in to!!!
"Ouch, my skin!" That was so funny to me. :)
when he did the fresh Prince joke 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Pretty please do War Room or Mom's Night Out, pretty pretty please! :)
A COMMERCIAL ACTUALLY PLAYED AFTER YOU SAID A WORD FROM OUR SPONSER! WAS THAT ON PURPOSE!
Who's that guy at 21:07 ?
+Firecycle HAHAHAHA. I didn't remember this part, and then I checked and was like, "What is this person talking about, that's clearly me....oh, I get it now"
I loved this movie and you have no idea how hard I laughed at this review.
"You dropped your glass slipper!" Haha!
would you say that this is probably the best film you've reviewed on Movie Night
Hmmm. I think It had the most potential.
+Say Goodnight Kevin I think Paul is great writer. That being said he writes mostly audio dramas, of I'm not mistaken. Not saying he can't cross over, it's just a little different at form.
I really enjoyed this review. So hilarious.
Nice, as always.
I had a class in high school with the writers son, and he was all excited about the mvie and his dads script, and then I read the World Mag. review and was like oh.... that's too bad. I think they need to release another Bonhoeffer film, and these guys could probably do it well.
ok right when you said, "and now a word from my sponsors." a commercial played.
Dude that's what happened to me
weird, maybe it was planned...CONSPIRACY!
I think Kevin was able to make the ad play there.
Charlotte has officially reverted to the Hornets team. Just a note. Thanks for the laughs, though!
They marketed this very hard to homeschoolers as something you can use with your history...
We went to the screening, and I was surprised to see someone handing out tracts to all the attendees, which I thought was rather hilarious as it was heavily marketed to Christian homeschoolers.
"This bar must be the youtube comment section of colonial times" Ha Kevin that's hilarousXD also I do get that liberty kids reference:P
Because I’m that person: Crown oversight of the East India Company only really started in 1787, but control over India’s government didn’t pass into Crown hands until 1858. Until then, the looting of India’s wealth was still very much a corporate affair. This is not to say the Crown Raj was better for India’s people, only that the Crown wasn’t to blame at this point in time. You (and the movie) are a little ahead of yourself, is all. 😉