Otto Aviation Reveals The Plan For OTTO CELERA 800 - The World's Fastest and Most Efficient Aircraft

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ม.ค. 2024
  • The Otto Celera 800: A Glimpse into the Future of Sustainable Aviation
    Soar through the skies at supersonic speeds while leaving a minimal environmental footprint - that's the bold promise of the Otto Celera 800, a revolutionary aircraft poised to disrupt the aviation industry. This transonic super-laminar design is a marvel of engineering, incorporating cutting-edge technology to achieve unprecedented levels of efficiency and sustainability. Let's delve deeper into the fascinating world of the Celera 800:
    1. The Science of Laminar Flow:
    Imagine air smoothly gliding over the aircraft's surface, instead of the usual turbulent chaos. This is the magic of laminar flow, the holy grail of aerodynamic design. The Celera 800's elongated fuselage and specially designed wings are meticulously crafted to maintain this ideal airflow, reducing drag by a staggering 80% compared to conventional aircraft. Think of it as slicing through the air like a hot knife through butter!
    2. A Symphony of Advanced Materials:
    Lightweight and incredibly strong, carbon fiber composites form the backbone of the Celera 800. This not only keeps the aircraft nimble and fuel-efficient but also allows for the precise shaping necessary to sustain laminar flow. Every curve and contour is meticulously calculated to ensure optimal airflow and drag reduction.
    3. Farewell to Rivets and Seams:
    In the world of laminar flow, even the tiniest disruption can be detrimental. That's why the Celera 800 ditches traditional rivets and seams in critical areas. Instead, the panels are seamlessly bonded together using a special adhesive, creating a smooth, uninterrupted surface for the air to caress.
    4. Sustainable Skies with Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF):
    The Celera 800 isn't just aerodynamically efficient; it's also environmentally conscious. By running on SAF, a fuel derived from renewable sources like plant oils and algae, the aircraft reduces its carbon footprint by up to 80% compared to traditional jet fuel. Imagine flying across continents while leaving a minimal environmental impact - that's the future the Celera 800 represents.
    5. Speed Demon with a Green Heart:
    Forget those agonizingly slow commutes across continents. The Celera 800 boasts a top speed of Mach 1.2, translating to a blistering 720 mph. That's significantly faster than traditional jets, slashing travel times and making the world feel a whole lot smaller. But here's the kicker: even at these supersonic speeds, the Celera 800's fuel efficiency remains unmatched, thanks to its laminar flow design and lightweight construction.
    6. Stepping into the Future of Flying:
    The Celera 800 isn't just about speed and efficiency; it's also about redefining the in-flight experience. Imagine stepping into a spacious cabin bathed in natural light from panoramic digital windows, offering stunning views without compromising laminar flow. The interior is a haven of comfort and luxury, equipped with state-of-the-art technology and a fly-by-wire control system for a truly smooth and effortless journey.
    Comparison between celera 500L and celera 800
    The Otto Celera 500L and 800 are both revolutionary aircraft pushing the boundaries of efficiency and sustainability, but they cater to different needs and represent distinct stages in the Celera journey. Here's a breakdown of their key differences:
    1. Design and Purpose:
    Celera 500L: This single-engine turboprop aircraft acts as a technology demonstrator, paving the way for the more advanced Celera 800. It focuses on verifying laminar flow principles and proving the viability of the TSL design.Celera 800: This twin-engine jet represents the culmination of Celera's technology advancements. It's designed for commercial production and targets longer-range, supersonic travel with a luxurious passenger experience.
    Performance:
    Speed: The Celera 500L's maximum speed is around 300 knots (560 km/h), while the Celera 800 boasts a supersonic Mach 1.2 capability.
    Range: The 500L has a range of around 3,500-4,000 nautical miles , while the 800 aims for transcontinental distances exceeding 4,500 nautical miles (8,300 km).
    Fuel Efficiency: Both aircraft achieve significant fuel savings compared to traditional jets, but the Celera 800 boasts a more pronounced 60% reduction due to its twin-engine configuration and optimized design for longer ranges.
    Watch More:
    Inside Otto Celera 500L A Plane That Revolutionized Aviation History : • Inside Otto Celera 500...
    Otto Reveals Plan For Hydrogen Powered Calera 750L | Updated Version Of Otto Calera 500L : • Otto Reveals Plan For ...
    subscribe channel - www.youtube.com/@technologyvi...

ความคิดเห็น • 32

  • @ethan93m
    @ethan93m 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Looks like an Orca which was designed by the best scientist known to man!!

  • @wadesaxton6079
    @wadesaxton6079 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    What happened to the other Otto aircraft. One or two test flights and it disappeared, along with all of its incredible claims.

    • @wololo10
      @wololo10 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's always like that

    • @steve0ne11
      @steve0ne11 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I think there were over 50 test flights to date. With the current engine configuration I think they were only able to reach 250-275 mph. But they are supposedly fitting a more powerful engine that will bring that above 400 mph. No idea if they were able to achieve efficiency goals though.

  • @viarnay
    @viarnay 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Eyecandy!! 😍🥰😍🤩

  • @Mausju
    @Mausju 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Video sounds like PR and the numbers are wrong, interesting apart from that.

  • @user-ph8fe2eh5z
    @user-ph8fe2eh5z 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I want one…

  • @hubschenk1652
    @hubschenk1652 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If the Celera 800 flies at Mach 1.2, it will produce a sonic boom. This will probably only be permitted over open sea, as with other supersonic projects. NASA is also working on this problem with the X59.

  • @darrena2625
    @darrena2625 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Natural light with digital windows ? Hmmmm

  • @user-tq2vq3yy5b
    @user-tq2vq3yy5b 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where are they gonna put the gas?

  • @flippert0
    @flippert0 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hmm, this sounds a lot different than before. Thought, the 500 would be real product according to previous claims.

  • @sirtwigg1479
    @sirtwigg1479 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This kind of reminds me of one of those mega projects in some oil-rich country. Lots of fancy renders and buzzwords.

  • @oTuro
    @oTuro 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    720p and re-using footage multiple times in the same 6min video and you want people to take this project seriously with the expectation of funding?

    • @bhatkat
      @bhatkat 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Producing what appears to be CGI video is very expensive and the demo is not the product. I've come up with many new items and have two patents and counting, do know something about demos.

  • @yvanpimentel9950
    @yvanpimentel9950 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I thought the celera 500 is power by a diesel ICE engine,no a turboprop.

  • @Richibald1
    @Richibald1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You copied your script incorrectly. Mach 1.2 Does not equal 720 mph... it = 920.7 mph
    Significantly faster no? Yawww.

    • @philliplow5379
      @philliplow5379 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      At what altitude please?

    • @yvanpimentel9950
      @yvanpimentel9950 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@philliplow5379 Mach is a set number at sea level and a set temperature.

  • @adruvitpandit5816
    @adruvitpandit5816 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Celera 800 in transonic not supersonic.

  • @jmhofmeyr
    @jmhofmeyr 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Digital windows...what the actual fuck......no thx. We have enough screens in our life...I want real windows thx.

    • @INSIGHTCO
      @INSIGHTCO 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree with you and I understand them. Real windows would create turbulence along the airframe. Thus this reduces the performance

  • @laulaja-7186
    @laulaja-7186 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All the efficiency in the world isn't going to save me the millions of dollars needed to buy this thing. The same is probably true for almost everyone. That makes all this talk of efficiency a bit meaningless and out of reach, doesn't it?

  • @XMGi00
    @XMGi00 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Innovative? Still looks and flies like a regular airplane. 🤷‍♂

    • @bhatkat
      @bhatkat 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The innovation would be the dramatic gains in fuel efficiency, my question is why these haven't been flying for at least twenty years, you could be right in the sense of no dramatic technical innovation.

  • @Sandhoeflyerhome
    @Sandhoeflyerhome หลายเดือนก่อน

    As soon as the bullshit mentions "sustainability" I check out

  • @dangermouse8466
    @dangermouse8466 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    720 mph is not even Mach 1. At least get your maths right.

    • @abramdancy3111
      @abramdancy3111 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Mach speeds vary with altitude. Mach 1 is slower at 40,000' than at sea level.

    • @dangermouse8466
      @dangermouse8466 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@abramdancy3111 Ok, that's something new I just learnt. I didn't realise the speed varied with altitude. Thanks for informing me.

    • @Kamykc312
      @Kamykc312 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@dangermouse8466but no, you had to show you're the smartest on town and how stupid and limited we are, aren't we? Did you ever asked yourself how immature is? You just showed us how insecured and rude you actually are

    • @yvanpimentel9950
      @yvanpimentel9950 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@dangermouse8466 the speed of sound vary but mack is a constant #
      if you measure like that in space wouldn't be a mack speed.