OJ Simpson Deposition - (Day 6) Feb 22nd 1996 - Part 5/5
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ต.ค. 2024
- O.J. Simpson was deposed over five days in Jan 1996. commencing on Jan 22 & concluding on-Jan 26, 1996. One month later, Simpson was recalled & deposed over 4 additional days (Feb 22-23 & Feb 26-27, 1996).
This is rarely-seen footage of the first day of the additional four days of deposition Mr Simpson was forced to give.
Present in the room are -
Defendant: O.J. Simpson
Representatives: Bob Baker, Daniel Leonard & Phil Baker
Daniel Petrocell (for Plaintiff Fred Goldman)
Michael Brewer & Christopher Olsen (for Plaintiff Sharon Rufo)
John Kelly (for Plaintiff Louis Brown & the Estate of Nicole Brown)
Videographer: Rod Rigole
Examination by Daniel Petrocelli
![[Watch Party] RoV Pro League 2024 Winter | ( Bacon Time Vs FS )](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/lD6z1BugdZw/mqdefault.jpg)
He smiles like he didn't do what he did... something is really wrong with him....I wonder if there is frontal lobe damage in his murderous head
But he's now dead. Aren't you happy and pleased that he is?
Also when he said she was the BEST MOTHER WAS TRUTH AS WELL..
He would only admit to things if there was an eye witness or a written report from the police… so obvious!!! Omg such a bad liar
So OJ is basically saying that in this note Nicole wrote him that he never received, that she lied about faking a bike accident at the doctor exam??? He’s such a terrible liar! It’s so transparent!!! It’s preposterous that she would make up an incident about his physical abuse & call it a “bike accident” in a letter written TO HIM, when he clearly knows the truth!! The LAPD may have attempted to frame O.J. to hammer out a slam dunk case, but if so they ultimately framed the guiltiest man in California trial history!!
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤½s
WHO IS THIS .
....REPASENATE ??? HE IS A HABIYCHALE LIAR OJ SIMPSON
THEY BELIEVE THERYE OWN LIES😮
OJ was not framed. 😂😂
This is definitely the most informative day thus far
Wilens Galette yes...it is. It’s obvious he did beat her quite often, although I think they would hit each other, I wouldn’t want a punch off of OJ, would you? He seems to deny everything unless it puts shade on Nicole. You’d think he was perfect if you believed him. It was all Nicole, according to OJ. I just refuse to believe that. It’s never that one sided.
Trying break OJ down he smart strong man
Pommie bears Nicole was no angel everyone wants to believe. She didn’t deserve to die, but there was a rush to judgement on the police.
@@pommiebears "I may have been obsessive in that I bought her too many things." 😅
@@Gracelee681 you so right
His “community service” involved him raising money for charity. That’s it. He did nothing else. Didn’t sweep streets or pick up litter.....he called friends and asked for money for charity. How is that punishment? 😒
He had to make all the calls Collect.
O.j. stop going beyond question volunteering stuff
He actually had to arrange a charity golf tournament. Not much work but you're still inaccurate.
@@flunder50 considering charity golf tournaments were his actual occupation at the time i would say it was no work at all.
@@markmac2206 my point is my issue with the entire case. These little details that are being ignored. Pommie bears was adamant that all he did was raise money for charity. I was saying arranging a golf tournament isn't hard work either but he was still inaccurate on what he did. That's this entire case in a nutshell. Media, documentaries and the general public saying things that weren't accurate
At certain times you can see his face that Nicole and Ron probably saw that night..🤨
Guilty
GUILTY as hell. Cacy Anthony and Michael Jackson also…
Take away the murders and incidents of abuse and you're left with 1000 reasons why not to live in the first world.
Bob Baker is insufferable.
Turn up... the volume. Please, my speakaz
I always hang my cloths up
Regarding "the packet"lawyer ask where they came from, where come from HIS lawyer says irrelevant don't answer,
Did you ever ask no.
It's now years later that I'm watching this. Didn't anyone notice that when the person questioning him was sifting through papers, Oj sang "go away little girl'"?
Lawyer injects it's irrelevant where he think "the packet" of "diary" came from? ????s. Do you think relevant?
Wine cellar,wine closet what else would you call it? 😅
I went there on her birthday
That's not what "charade" means.
13 I never saw the letter from usc
For the love of God, can that attorney get some cough medicine/cough drops? 😷
😂😂😂😂😂😂
I was wondering if it was a secret cough code 😂😂😂😂
12 some girl took a letter on my windshield.
112 atusc later off wondshiel edit uscletter on windshield
Personal safety nick no
26 drunk didn't hit her
34 safety of niche. Ron not happy with n.
If they can read her “private” diary, why not reveal her “private” phone records so we know who and when she talked to last????????????????????????!!!!!
I think OJ is innocent. Nicole knew how to get to OJ by the way she dressed, being very promiscuous. She seemed very feisty. If she was continually abused, why didn't she leave. She had the means to get away from him. The night of Sydney's recital, she told her mother he is my sole mate. She was just as disturbed ss he was. She wouldve gone back to OJ whenever he wanted her.
Not many people understand this
Why oj ring and the interview ring 💍 🤔 are identical waw 😳 it show all plan their are in thesame group. Waw
4 44.bruis my arm. Who saw this.
742 birthday on her dayy
Oj knows he fuked
4 55
22 contemplated aa
32 went totheropy
13 her living habits bothered you're was sloppy and messy
4514 I mhave been obsessive in I boughter to ma y things
14 56 I fell off a bike
14 you were more neat and orderly
37 burviosbrakedown
You don’t need a dream team of lawyers to prove your innocence if you are truly innocent. Personally, I Believe No lawyer is necessary if I am Innocent.... the facts would speak... for themselves. You would only need one lawyer and only if it was so absolutely necessary because of of media Speculation and more importantly if you were high profile....And the destruction it causes even to an innocent person. I would not feel The Necessity of throwing good money after bad if there was no reason. .So sad and tragic that that a horrific murder has never been followed up and not taken to the degree to find the real killer. No justice for the victims and their families. Speaks for itself. Not only speaks but shouts. Had nothing to do with race, or planting evidence.... corruption hate, or history.....but only used as defence. Don’t think in anybody’s reasonable mind...Unless you Had a strong conviction before hand before evidence was presented... you could find this man innocent..... disregarding....incompetence. corruption of police....scientific evidence Domestic abuse and photos, discussions with friends and family, which was obviously disregarded...which Was what the defence Based their whole strategy of defence. Prejudiced Jury on not on the blatant evidence is the only conclusion to the verdict. Celebrity because he was A so called national “hero”.... was very important, and, The defence had an answer for everything which was obviously manipulated to Defend the man that they knew in their hearts was guilty. Why would you need So many lawyers in a second case that you knew you were obviously not going to be tried again for murder? Only used to try and Regain his reputation, but most importantly money. Again, if truly innocent, why do you need a lawyer? Was an uphill battle for the prosecution from the very start regardless of evidence. Today...when race Has become the number one factor More than ever before and used as the subject and defence for every crime Of colour.....this case would never have become such a long process today. No doubt in my mind that there has been injustices done not only in the past, but truly in this case. Justice should be justice and not “coloured”. Innocent or guilty Is the heart of the matter. Don’t care who the guilty party is!!!! OJ is obviously guilty, I pray he believes in the mercy of God.....and has asked God to forgive him.... which God will....because God is merciful, and Jesus died for our sins regardless if it’s a lie or A murder of a million people.....and we are all sinners regardless of the degree.
Not very bright. Simpson was the rare defendant that matched or exceeded the state’s resources to fight the charge.
It shouldn’t be that way but unfortunately it is necessary. The old saying is true “anyone who represents themselves in court has a fool for a client”
Shut up
Not true how many innocent ppl go t jail ? Money helps get justice or not
OJ was definitely guilty, but EVERYBODY needs an attorney when they are dealing with the legal system. There is a word used to describe someone that thinks they don't need a lawyer...
13 her living habits concerned ber
I love OJ voice
No he is not a smooth talker. He is a murderer. If you hear him as a smooth voice there's something wrong with you.
@@yourmajestymyhighness9273 prove it, the state of California could not, very smart man could not frame Simpson, beyond reasonable doubt not guilty, something wrong with you, OJ
@@yourmajestymyhighness9273 ha ha all detectives looked like fools living off blood money shame on them Marcia Clark living off OJ fame why they took trial, how stupid all them papers and exhibits Mark Furhmam screwed case, jump fense and moving glove how stupid , too much evidence
@M S so was can after, Lang, Furhmam liars
Marcia Clark, Kato Kali all of them living off blood money, so donate it to Fred and Kim Goldman
Is this another criminal trial double jeopardy
This was for the civil trial.
It's crazy that this is allowed in America. Of course, he would've been found guilty in this civil trial because everyone was mad he got away in the criminal trial and they would not let him get away again. This is not fair I agree.
@@macedarling1180 true harassment
Mace Darling It’s not fair that he killed the Brown’s daughter and the Goldman’s son either!!!
@@macedarling1180 while I agree I hate in this country u are allowed to being any frivolous law suit u want. I could name one that was so ridiculous I felt so bad. Unfortunately among the frivolous their are legit ones so all get their day in court. Usually if u win a criminal case the people wont take it to civil bc a lawyer wont take it unless u pay them but if it's a decent lawyer who wont waste ur time & money or his time like I believe the Micheal jackson criminal case that went to trial those people were total liars & frauds. One example is the mom had been caught shoplifting cried racism & successfully somehow won a civil case. Also just the way when Micheal was away they would spend a fortune on his dime. Their were other things but no lawyer would take their civil case . Their was no race at all brought into the case either. Nobody really was outraged when he got off. When scott Peterson was convicted their was no civil trial. When bill cosby was convicted many of the women did sue . Imo I think many of those women just jumped on the bandwagon. So in this case would the goldmans have sued if he were convicted ? I dont know. They say they did not care about the money just wanted a court to say in record he did it. If oj was joe schmoe that did it & got off on a technicality would they have sued ? U cant get blood from a stone . But would they have sued some broke nobody to get a court to say he did it who knows ? I dont think petrocelli took this on a contingency he was not some big name , he was a buisness lawyer not criminal. The goldmans & browns prob raised money. I don't know why they both didnt just team up & have the same attorney bc petrocelli covers really only nicole bc she was in this case the target according to people & ron an innocent bystander. I do get the sense that people out there are annoyed by the goldmans bc they are on every tv show or show up for every special. Some think they are " gold diggers & love the attention " some think they are just keeping Ron's memory alive. I think bc the Brown's other than denise dont show up on tv at all look at that as " it's enough with the goldmans " but the browns will forever be in a tough spot bc they are related to ojs kids & its such a conflict that I'm surprised they even sued here bc the kids were still little & they loved those kids & oj got full custody & he held the cards to see the kids. At this point denise has not shown up on tv in years . I do agree in general that the cottage industry this launched for so many around the case with the book deals & TV jobs is disgusting bc it's all on the backs if two people butchered. I believe Marcia clarke half asses the case once she got her 4.2 million book deal & she writes murder mysteries. I see why furhman does it bc he lost his job & pension & is has a conviction of perjury on his record. So he actually suffered the worst monetarily & in life out of all the non victims & alleged murderer. I mean the jury people all wrote books I think one posed for playboy. Look at the morally corrupt faye resnic immediately writing a book saying nicole did all these salacious embarrassing things.
Not guilty the end stupid questions
Stupid questions for a stupid person.
Yes why keep beating dead 🐎
Ask over and over trying tick him
OJ volunteering too much just answer questions DAM OJ
He is SO guilty!!!!
This is all just complete nonsense. Every claim of an ARGUMENT is now “evidence” of murder? Really? This is the straw that is being grasped at?
The only relevant behavior is stalking. OJ’s admission in earlier testimony that he likes “to drive around” to clear his head was intriguing and any evidence of stalking should be the focus.
All this nonsense about arguments had between two hot tempered people during the course of a marriage is utterly worthless as to what OJ did or did not do on June 12 1994.
Watch the trial you moron
Yes it is important because it shows he was a violent person towards her and theres a motive
Also when he said she was the BEST MOTHER WAS TRUTH AS WELL..