Don't listen to horrible reviews. This game is amazing. Feels and plays like an old school Silent Hill game with modern graphics. Play on Hard with no hints though, otherwise the game is too easy. 8/10 I had to reload a saved game twice because I got stuck on an obstacle. The music cuts out here and there and when you start a new chapter you get a flash frame before the cinematic. Framerate dropped a few times, mostly during cinematics. Those were the only technical issues I had. Im sure they will get patched.
@@Piranha-Boy Well the guy is famous from Stranger Things on Netflix, he plays the Sherriff, and is definitely not British. Given what a smash hit Stranger Things was (and rightly so), I'm sure his fee was not cheap in the slightest. The woman I know nothing about. OP is spot on though.
@@narniaphuket You're spot on. I mean he does plenty decent as an actor in that show but he is FAR from an A lister with sufficient draw factor that would effect game sales. Money was misspent for sure. This isn't close to say the CP2077 situation with hiring Keanu Reeves & Idris Elba for example. Now that decision I understood.
Agreed. It looks to have a good core experience, but it needs some updates, and patches. Still a solid buy after maybe 6 to 8 months after release. Might wait until Christmas to pick this one up on deep sale.
4/10 is just absurd. This is NOT a bad game. Yes, the combat is not good but it's functional. Other than that, every part of AitD is decent, good or even great. I love the setting. It's got great environmental variety. The game looks and sounds good and the puzzles are pretty fun. The characters are goofy. And the story is interesting all the way up to the confusing end. It's definitely worth playing if you're into the genre. We need more games like this. AA experiences that doesn't cost 300 million USD to make and have that charm from the past.
Feels like this is an AA game and needed to be priced like it. If this was £30 at launch I'd buy it, but now I'll just wait a year or two for a deep sale.
It's always funny seeing people feel entitled to positive reviews for games they're hyped for. It's even funnier seeing them trying to pretend that not agreeing with a lower score than what they wanted makes them free thinkers somehow.
I didn’t even know the game was coming out until it was out. The trailer looked good so I picked it up. It’s easy the most interesting survive horror game I’ve played in years. I would give it a 8 out of 10. Far more interesting ideas the the RE games and the puzzles make you think,
Clearly caters to a certain audience and not for everyone, very high and low reviews, this is all based on one person's opinion these people are no experts, try the game yourself and see if you like it or watch if it interests you 👍
The real root of this curse is that the video game industry is ashamed of video games as a medium, so they compensate by including Hollywood actors in order to validate and legitimize games as an art form.
They were demanding compensation for better reviews on this game but this company is low budget so they didn't pay the amount good enough for an honest review so GameSpot and other critics are pooping on it and not being honest in these videos Glad you noticed the controls
No hes just pointing out something obvious. Ive seen 4s. This aint a 4. 6 maybe sure, but its playable, a 4 indicates shovelware. Which this isnt, close but no@dmwrobinson
Yet it seems that a lot of gamer youtubers that like the originals and survival horror games of old in general actually like the game, like Gman. I'm getting this, but at 39-49€ max.
is there some conspiracy going on against this game or didn't they pay you enough money like EA or Blizz?? Yeah, it's technically not as good as RERE Ok. But the atmosphere is still great, graphics and sound are very well and it's lots of fun, even with "a bit" wonky combat.... 4/10 wow, if there's anything 4/10, it's the guy who did the review.
Yes, mechanically, it's very much like resident Evil 2 remake plus Silent Hill downpour with a vibe and structure of eternal darkness for gamecube. Solid.
You mention a story twist here that’s repeated from another game. But this is a remake afterall, which I didn’t hear you mention and as such I’m wondering if this game’s twist from the original predates whatever game you’re saying it stole from? Perhaps that other game stole this game’s twist via the original but since nobody remembers or played the OG, we think it was stolen
I agree with the poor casting. David Harbour is a great actor but I strongly feel he shouldn't be Edward Carnby; he's too beefy and menacing to play the OG gentleman Edward Carnby from 1992. I suppose the designers at Pieces Interactive opted more for The New Nightmare and 2008 Carnby instead. The game itself looks alright. I may get it when it's on sale. Thanks for the review, GameSpot.
Honestly I thought the same, but after a few hours of playing David Harbour did the character some great service. Think hard boiled detective vs the OG Edward Carnby, not bad truthfully
Easy 7 out of 10, yeah the combat isn't amazing but fans of this genre don't play for the combat. Not every game needs a skill tree, christ.... It's a decent game in the genre, if you're unsure wait a few months when it'll be $20.
Please do I have it and I haven't enjoyed a game from alone in the dark since the new nightmare this one is very misunderstood by critics and check out the user's reviews as you can see they give a way higher rating than any of these critics out there
@@georgechilders4680 it feels like a old school horror game and the puzzles really make you think also the story has some interesting twist and turns :)
Well a lot of games are mediocre at best the last couple of years, some games are good to great but most games these games are just Ok. But from the first gameplay i saw i knew it would flop
There is no winning with y'all, if they give a positive review it's bc they are paid by the dev to give good review if they give a bad review it's bc they don't like good games
Such a shame, it sounds like th story setting and puzzles are good. But the core gameplay and combat is so bad that it feels unplayable. Feels like they needed to partner with someone to let them make the combat. So they could focus on the bits they were clearly pretty good at. Like what square enix did with nier automata. Nier 1 had good ideas but rough gameplay so for the sequel they drafted in platinum to make the gameplay parts while square made the concept and story and it turned out to be a masterpiece.
This guy shouldn't review games if he really give this Alone in the Dark game a 4/10. Come on now dude you seem very bias, and being that as a game review is not a good thing.
This review is a horrible take. Take it from someone who absolutely loves real survival horror, games do yourself a favor and pick up the game. The characters in the story are interesting. The location is perfect, the atmosphere, hold up a compelling tone and the puzzles are actually difficult. It makes you actually feel like you’re a detective solving a case.
IMO the issues with the game are typically its controls.. it can be really janky.. Other than that I thought the story was intriguing.. kinda like Alan Wake meets Shutter Island, made it feel like everything was or wasnt actually happening.. TBH the ending felt rushed and jumped the shark, but that doesnt make it bad .. 7.5/10
I am not one to criticize reviews often. I take them with a grain of salt. It is just one person's opinion. That being said, this game deserves more than a 4. I bought it for Series X today and played for 4.5 hours. I never noticed some of this reviewers complaints. So far it's quite good and at least a 7 for me, although that could change. Disappointing that people might see a 4 and forget about the game. It:s only $60 CAD too. No mention of that in the review.
Well, for me that was disappointing as I was looking forward to the game. I might still get it but, on sell and hopefully the devs sort out the clunky controls.
I can’t get over how bad the graphics look even on cinematic settings at 4K on PC. Truly looks like a PS3 game, especially when it comes to face models. Everything about it just screams that it was made on a tight budget for a 2024 game. Ended up refunding it when I found out, and experienced that it also suffers from terrible fps drops and hitching.
Alone in the Dark is a really good game! I think it'll be a sleeper hit when people buy it on sale (currently already at 50% off). It's a very atmospheric and wonderful game! No Call of Duty though I guess...
Sometimes I think some games include combat just because it's expected of them, but the final result is a combat system that's stiff, uninspired, and proves more of a liability than an asset. This looks like it would've been vastly better if it minimized fight sequences and became more of an adventure game, cause I genuinely loved the atmosphere from the demo, so it's too bad it doesn't seem the thing they highlight the most from this review.
Ironically the original that came out in 1992 was more an adventure game that indirectly influenced and birth the survival horror genre although it had horror elements.
The original AitD (1992) literally starts with combat. The first scene involves grabbing a shotgun and barricade the window. The next floor down then has zombies and monsters.
@@Jenema2 Fair enough, I think my point still stands; that having several enemies especially in the beginning of the game ruins the atmospheric horror that both games (og and this one from what I've seen and played in the demo) seem to be going for.
@@AmariMarvelous I think the og game was trying to bring action elements to the adventure genre, which led to a very clunky combat system, but I still appreciate it as a highly influential game that inspired far better ones like Resident Evil.
Nah it was a lot better than people are making it out to be. Remember this is a solid AA type of game. Yes, there was some occasional jank but I enjoyed it. Finished playing as Detective Carnby, playing again as Emily to pick up the other collectable and see her side of the story
I knew this was going to be the case when they banned any reviews till after release. That being said, the reviewer sounded like he enjoyed it more than a 4/10
Another undercooked game, its getting frustrating needing to wait for patches to fix games that should really be completed, although early access titles that completely flip their mechanics later on in the development cycle are just as annoying
@Faded.Visuals Good to know. I am a fan of the franchise and love both actors but yeah, visually it just wasn't hitting it for me from how it looked in the review
Actually the game was rather enjoyable. Remember, this is an AA type of game, however, it definitely keep me interested and mostly entertained. I would recommend it
4 is kinda harsh, at least it's 6, could been 8 if the gameplay was polished & smooth at the end.. 4 doesn't mean anything since most fans will buy it sooner or later But yeah.. with in 3 months from now, it's will be disoucnted & slightly better gameplay (hope they do some patches)
Personally I don't see why you can't buy it now. Finished playing through as Detective Cramby and I thought the game was rather enjoyable! I mean yea there could be some polish here and there, but I went in with a mindset that this is a Double AA type of game, and quite frankly better than most triple AAA games right now. But yeah I recommend it
The graphic looks like a generation ago, from 2014-15 when GTX 980 still fresh. Not something that come out in the middle of this generation life-cycle.
6 at a push, could have been so much better, so many bugs, combat is awful. Should not have released it yet. Really disappointing, I would advise to wait and buy when on sale if you really want to play, not worth the price atm
Don't listen to horrible reviews. This game is amazing. Feels and plays like an old school Silent Hill game with modern graphics. Play on Hard with no hints though, otherwise the game is too easy. 8/10
I had to reload a saved game twice because I got stuck on an obstacle. The music cuts out here and there and when you start a new chapter you get a flash frame before the cinematic. Framerate dropped a few times, mostly during cinematics. Those were the only technical issues I had. Im sure they will get patched.
They should’ve cut the Hollywood actors and used that money for more development.
Arent they like, british actors from tv series?
@@Piranha-Boy Well the guy is famous from Stranger Things on Netflix, he plays the Sherriff, and is definitely not British. Given what a smash hit Stranger Things was (and rightly so), I'm sure his fee was not cheap in the slightest. The woman I know nothing about. OP is spot on though.
@@quadcarnage8462 and it likely didn't contribute to any sales, which is usually the whole point of higher pay...the draw factor
@@narniaphuket You're spot on. I mean he does plenty decent as an actor in that show but he is FAR from an A lister with sufficient draw factor that would effect game sales. Money was misspent for sure.
This isn't close to say the CP2077 situation with hiring Keanu Reeves & Idris Elba for example. Now that decision I understood.
100% They seem to be more concerned with "WE HAVE THIS GUY!"
It looks similar to the Sinking City. Good art design but janky AF combat.
Even though it was frustrating to play I still loved that game
@@royrogers1010001agreed
It was janky and frustrating to play ( hence why I never completed it)
But it had good story and atmosphere etc
Yes! I couldn’t finish the game cause of how janky it felt. Shame this is going to fall into that vein also
thanks for letting us know the combat is unoptimized.
i'll hold off for a month. see intial reviews.
see if devs can fix these issues with some patch.
Agreed. It looks to have a good core experience, but it needs some updates, and patches. Still a solid buy after maybe 6 to 8 months after release. Might wait until Christmas to pick this one up on deep sale.
Don’t wait the game was a lot of fun!
can u suggest me how can I improve my content
4/10 is just absurd. This is NOT a bad game. Yes, the combat is not good but it's functional. Other than that, every part of AitD is decent, good or even great. I love the setting. It's got great environmental variety. The game looks and sounds good and the puzzles are pretty fun. The characters are goofy. And the story is interesting all the way up to the confusing end. It's definitely worth playing if you're into the genre. We need more games like this. AA experiences that doesn't cost 300 million USD to make and have that charm from the past.
Feels like this is an AA game and needed to be priced like it. If this was £30 at launch I'd buy it, but now I'll just wait a year or two for a deep sale.
That’s dumb. It’s a great game. I had no regrets about the price at all. People always need to find any reason to complain
I just got it for $30 today. I'd say that's a much more fair price. Decent game.
It's always funny seeing people feel entitled to positive reviews for games they're hyped for.
It's even funnier seeing them trying to pretend that not agreeing with a lower score than what they wanted makes them free thinkers somehow.
Well to be fair, I am no hyped for the game but a 4 seems way to low, at least based on the gameplay that I saw
I didn’t even know the game was coming out until it was out. The trailer looked good so I picked it up. It’s easy the most interesting survive horror game I’ve played in years. I would give it a 8 out of 10. Far more interesting ideas the the RE games and the puzzles make you think,
Clearly caters to a certain audience and not for everyone, very high and low reviews, this is all based on one person's opinion these people are no experts, try the game yourself and see if you like it or watch if it interests you 👍
Agreed. Can’t always rely on scores or ratings these days, a lot of mediocrity does get high ratings and popularity quite often it seems.
I just want Alone in the Dark to get a good game already. It's really disappointing that the last good game was 23 years ago.
Maybe play the game yourself and form an opinion
This game is very good so far I'm playing it I swear critics are pooping on it for no reason
This game is fantastic Don’t listen to this reviewer is far more interesting than the majority of modern resident evil games.
can u suggest me how can I improve my content
this one is good
I kinda saw this coming with this game. After the delays it had and then that awful demo they gave us with no combat.
Video games staring Hollywood celebrities are just cursed to be bad (most of the time)
The real root of this curse is that the video game industry is ashamed of video games as a medium, so they compensate by including Hollywood actors in order to validate and legitimize games as an art form.
Arent they like, british actors from tv series?
can u suggest me how can I improve my content
2:18 review on XBX why R1 R2?
They were demanding compensation for better reviews on this game but this company is low budget so they didn't pay the amount good enough for an honest review so GameSpot and other critics are pooping on it and not being honest in these videos
Glad you noticed the controls
Three reviews I saw at 6/10 and now a 4.
What's your point? It's subjective and Game is obviously mediocre for most
@@rayromano6249Just making an observation. No real point at all.
ya its rough but still looks decent.
@@kennethbailey9802 "rough" doesn't mean decent, if it's rough it's a bad game.
can u suggest me how can I improve my content
im still getting it. Its clearly the best one since the original.
Considering every game since the sequel has been a 3/10, it makes sense lol
Easily the 2nd or 3rd best "Alone in the Dark" game besides the 1992 original and New Nightmare (2001).
Don’t listen to the review it was a lot of fun to play though.
can u suggest me how can I improve my content
4/10 not enough dark to be alone in.
I was actually just thinking how I wish the game took place at nighttime instead of mostly in late afternoon.
😂😂
4/10 is just not right or fair theres no way this game is a 4 bruh
Are your feelings hurt fanboy?
No hes just pointing out something obvious. Ive seen 4s. This aint a 4. 6 maybe sure, but its playable, a 4 indicates shovelware. Which this isnt, close but no@dmwrobinson
Yet it seems that a lot of gamer youtubers that like the originals and survival horror games of old in general actually like the game, like Gman. I'm getting this, but at 39-49€ max.
@@KaijuCouture Fanboy#2 has entered the chat, nice BS narrative you've spun, close but no.
You haven't played yet you say someone who as finished the wrong?
is there some conspiracy going on against this game or didn't they pay you enough money like EA or Blizz?? Yeah, it's technically not as good as RERE Ok. But the atmosphere is still great, graphics and sound are very well and it's lots of fun, even with "a bit" wonky combat.... 4/10 wow, if there's anything 4/10, it's the guy who did the review.
It looks like Sinking City with Silent Hill Downpour combat.
It’s far better then both of those games.
@@Faceplay2 Currently playing it I'm on Episode 4. I can confirm it's better than those games, but still not perfect.Gamespot score 4 is a joke.
Yes, mechanically, it's very much like resident Evil 2 remake plus Silent Hill downpour with a vibe and structure of eternal darkness for gamecube. Solid.
You mention a story twist here that’s repeated from another game. But this is a remake afterall, which I didn’t hear you mention and as such I’m wondering if this game’s twist from the original predates whatever game you’re saying it stole from? Perhaps that other game stole this game’s twist via the original but since nobody remembers or played the OG, we think it was stolen
Looks like the bulk of the budget went to the salary of the actors.
Same will happen with SH2 remake. The gameplay is terrible in both games
SH2 will be worse. Bloober is an indie studio who have never handled combat before. They are known for walking sims like Layers of Fear.
I agree with the poor casting. David Harbour is a great actor but I strongly feel he shouldn't be Edward Carnby; he's too beefy and menacing to play the OG gentleman Edward Carnby from 1992. I suppose the designers at Pieces Interactive opted more for The New Nightmare and 2008 Carnby instead.
The game itself looks alright. I may get it when it's on sale. Thanks for the review, GameSpot.
Honestly I thought the same, but after a few hours of playing David Harbour did the character some great service. Think hard boiled detective vs the OG Edward Carnby, not bad truthfully
Who should be cast as carnby? Maybe jude law with a mustache? Or someone even more interesting?
Easy 7 out of 10, yeah the combat isn't amazing but fans of this genre don't play for the combat.
Not every game needs a skill tree, christ....
It's a decent game in the genre, if you're unsure wait a few months when it'll be $20.
Im on the fence about still getting it
Please do I have it and I haven't enjoyed a game from alone in the dark since the new nightmare this one is very misunderstood by critics and check out the user's reviews as you can see they give a way higher rating than any of these critics out there
The janky combat is a real shame. Must be even more unenjoyable to play as it is to watch.
well pc games gave it a 8/10, thats quite a different view
That's what I've seen with this game. Half people say it's bad, the other half say it's really fun but flawed
@@captainfach And I think the first half only watched reviews
I wish they did more with the tree, it wasn't fleshed out much. should have had more dedicated scenes and moments
I completely forgot that this franchise was returning. Apparently, it was for the best...?
Don’t listen to the review it was a lot of fun to play though.
Been waiting forever for this remake and honestly it looks incredible
Don’t listen to the review it was a lot of fun to play though.
@Faceplay2 thanks definitely buying it
@@georgechilders4680 it feels like a old school horror game and the puzzles really make you think also the story has some interesting twist and turns :)
@@Faceplay2 òld school nice!
yep @@Faceplay2 can u suggest me how can I improve my content
4/10? Wow Gamespot has been throwing out lower scores for in my opinion, decent games.
That preorder sting is sinking in eh
Well a lot of games are mediocre at best the last couple of years, some games are good to great but most games these games are just Ok.
But from the first gameplay i saw i knew it would flop
Right
There is no winning with y'all, if they give a positive review it's bc they are paid by the dev to give good review if they give a bad review it's bc they don't like good games
@@cristian_rarg And that's why game reviewers should ignore all of the outside noise.
I hope alone in the dark sells well cause at the end of the day you can thank this IP for many games
That doesn't mean it gets a pass when they release a sub par product.
dark story based horror adventure with action. Maybe not flawless, but the negativity is very very undeserved. I find this a great game
I’m enjoying it so far, I play, come back later for more. The love the “old New Orleans story.
How can you give it a 4? this is ridiculous, a 4/10 is very bad, you are the reason why games like Alone in the Dark might never comeback after this
Well make a better game then
I thank god for that awful cyberpunk initial release that forced me to stop pre purchasing games because this was on my list.
at least cyberpunk is amazing now, this doesnt even have potential tbh lol
Such a shame, it sounds like th story setting and puzzles are good. But the core gameplay and combat is so bad that it feels unplayable.
Feels like they needed to partner with someone to let them make the combat. So they could focus on the bits they were clearly pretty good at.
Like what square enix did with nier automata. Nier 1 had good ideas but rough gameplay so for the sequel they drafted in platinum to make the gameplay parts while square made the concept and story and it turned out to be a masterpiece.
Don’t listen to the review it was a lot of fun to play though.
8:04 u enjoyed this game...then y 4?
I wasn’t going to buy it until it got sale price and it seems with all the bad reviews that will be pretty soon. I’ll buy it at $30
Its already 10% off on steam for release day because the pre-order sales were so low.
Just finished this game today. It was incredible. Combat was a weak part of the game, but the story/narrative more than made up for it
it didn't
This guy shouldn't review games if he really give this Alone in the Dark game a 4/10. Come on now dude you seem very bias, and being that as a game review is not a good thing.
Don’t listen to the review it was a lot of fun to play though.
can u suggest me how can I improve my content
All reviews are biased there’s no such thing as an unbiased review
Seems very mixed. I've found just as many not good, as goods
4/10 guys. Ouch
I mean, if you're alone in the dark it shouldn't be that scary, you're alone...right? MOM?
This review makes me wanna play it more. 😎
Don’t listen to the review it was a lot of fun to play though.
This review is a horrible take.
Take it from someone who absolutely loves real survival horror, games do yourself a favor and pick up the game. The characters in the story are interesting. The location is perfect, the atmosphere, hold up a compelling tone and the puzzles are actually difficult. It makes you actually feel like you’re a detective solving a case.
IMO the issues with the game are typically its controls.. it can be really janky..
Other than that I thought the story was intriguing.. kinda like Alan Wake meets Shutter Island, made it feel like everything was or wasnt actually happening..
TBH the ending felt rushed and jumped the shark, but that doesnt make it bad .. 7.5/10
I am not one to criticize reviews often. I take them with a grain of salt. It is just one person's opinion. That being said, this game deserves more than a 4. I bought it for Series X today and played for 4.5 hours. I never noticed some of this reviewers complaints. So far it's quite good and at least a 7 for me, although that could change. Disappointing that people might see a 4 and forget about the game. It:s only $60 CAD too. No mention of that in the review.
Reviews like this are the reason people don't take game journalists/reviewers seriously.
A new video game starring the star of Stranger Things and the star of Killing Eve.
can u suggest me how can I improve my content
663 subs u doing well
@@ashish4k07 I never played that game before.
@@ashish4k07 Yes.
@@zairehaylock4974 so what would you suggest me what to improve
It's a great game with issues, the mechanics feels like old but at the same time, if you are a gamer, is enjoyable
I was hoping the game would be good - but was afraid it would turn out like this. The series was my favourite as a kid! 😥
It looks like this game will remain alone in the dark again
Nice try. Keep ya head up kid
Don’t listen to the review it was a lot of fun to play though.
*They gave it s 9/10 , absolute masterpiece. Saved you several minutes.*
Uh I doubt it
Is it better than FF VII Rebirth tho?
Haha, nice try, you almost got me.
you forgot the part were he takes PEDS and other such drugs
Well, for me that was disappointing as I was looking forward to the game. I might still get it but, on sell and hopefully the devs sort out the clunky controls.
"Jolly good ..... rather !!!", "ohhhh what what what what!"
I can’t get over how bad the graphics look even on cinematic settings at 4K on PC. Truly looks like a PS3 game, especially when it comes to face models.
Everything about it just screams that it was made on a tight budget for a 2024 game. Ended up refunding it when I found out, and experienced that it also suffers from terrible fps drops and hitching.
Alone in the Dark is a really good game! I think it'll be a sleeper hit when people buy it on sale (currently already at 50% off). It's a very atmospheric and wonderful game!
No Call of Duty though I guess...
Sometimes I think some games include combat just because it's expected of them, but the final result is a combat system that's stiff, uninspired, and proves more of a liability than an asset. This looks like it would've been vastly better if it minimized fight sequences and became more of an adventure game, cause I genuinely loved the atmosphere from the demo, so it's too bad it doesn't seem the thing they highlight the most from this review.
Ironically the original that came out in 1992 was more an adventure game that indirectly influenced and birth the survival horror genre although it had horror elements.
The original AitD (1992) literally starts with combat. The first scene involves grabbing a shotgun and barricade the window. The next floor down then has zombies and monsters.
@@Jenema2 Fair enough, I think my point still stands; that having several enemies especially in the beginning of the game ruins the atmospheric horror that both games (og and this one from what I've seen and played in the demo) seem to be going for.
@@AmariMarvelous I think the og game was trying to bring action elements to the adventure genre, which led to a very clunky combat system, but I still appreciate it as a highly influential game that inspired far better ones like Resident Evil.
It's may not be the best survival horror game but this too low of a score. I still want it when it drops price..
I’m just waiting for the Rise of the Ronin review
My uncle Jeremy had died by his own hand!
Ooof. No wonder the publisher hasn't bothered trying to hope this dud.
Simply brutal score.
Giving this game a 4/10 is a crime! It's a solid 8/10 imo!
Holy is it That Bad ??!!
16 years between entries and the best they could do was a buggy 8 hour game with dated visuals and clunky combat. It's pretty bad.
Nah it was a lot better than people are making it out to be. Remember this is a solid AA type of game. Yes, there was some occasional jank but I enjoyed it. Finished playing as Detective Carnby, playing again as Emily to pick up the other collectable and see her side of the story
Lack of enemies turned me off early
4??? really , common man , why so harsh ... its a good game , at least 6 or 7 but not 4 !
The sinking city 2
I knew this was going to be the case when they banned any reviews till after release. That being said, the reviewer sounded like he enjoyed it more than a 4/10
Don’t listen to the review it was a lot of fun to play though.
It did look pretty bad from the footage I’ve seen.
Another undercooked game, its getting frustrating needing to wait for patches to fix games that should really be completed, although early access titles that completely flip their mechanics later on in the development cycle are just as annoying
Silent hill has janky combat. Its still good.
Many channels did NOT received a review copy, so before even playing they already have judged it 😂😂 RagnarRox review is the only good one so far
If mídias says no i say yes.
I’ll wait till it goes on sale sub $30
can u suggest me how can I improve my content I can tell u if u suggest me where to get it free
Alone in the Dark!!! The Scary Creepiest thing is about Something behind the Dark itself!!! Unimaginable Creatures from the Darkness!!! 🔥😱🔥
At least the free demo was good.... 🎉
Seen 6/10 now 4/10, I'm going with, the game is a 5 at best lol
I'm going with a possible game of the year contender 😅
@@chechen149 😂
I will probs still play it but I do wish the character models looked better
I don't know if in this review they're playing either in performance or quality but I played in quality and the models are improved
@Faded.Visuals Good to know. I am a fan of the franchise and love both actors but yeah, visually it just wasn't hitting it for me from how it looked in the review
This game doesn't get reemed enough.
6.66/10.
The original was hardly mind blowing so no surprise the remake faired the same.
Unfair. Should be at least 6-6.5
Did you play the game? Probably not.
People seem to forget that combat is not the main focus of any AitD title.
so much money down the drain. impressive
It actually pretty good! Think of a better than average double AA resident evil. Almost like the Evil Within series.
Horrible score!! Not sure what game this guy just played.
Time to bury this and Silent Hill franchises for good I guess. Devs have no real vision to revive them
Really
Really😂
😥
i always knew this would be bad from the setting
Actually the game was rather enjoyable. Remember, this is an AA type of game, however, it definitely keep me interested and mostly entertained. I would recommend it
Terrible narrator, just talk normally, stop emphasising every other word
remake *Phantasmagoria* 😈
4 is kinda harsh, at least it's 6, could been 8 if the gameplay was polished & smooth
at the end.. 4 doesn't mean anything since most fans will buy it sooner or later
But yeah.. with in 3 months from now, it's will be disoucnted & slightly better gameplay (hope they do some patches)
Have you played it yourself?
Personally I don't see why you can't buy it now. Finished playing through as Detective Cramby and I thought the game was rather enjoyable! I mean yea there could be some polish here and there, but I went in with a mindset that this is a Double AA type of game, and quite frankly better than most triple AAA games right now. But yeah I recommend it
How disappointing…
I didn’t like the remake
Ouch
The graphic looks like a generation ago, from 2014-15 when GTX 980 still fresh. Not something that come out in the middle of this generation life-cycle.
6 at a push, could have been so much better, so many bugs, combat is awful. Should not have released it yet. Really disappointing, I would advise to wait and buy when on sale if you really want to play, not worth the price atm
😲
Well, there’s a reason this review doesn’t have many views…
But gggmanlives was paid to say the game is gud.