Is it time for Khilafah? | Answered by Mufti Taqi Usmani
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ส.ค. 2024
- In this insightful video, Mufti Taqi Uthmani addresses the significant question: Is it currently obligatory to establish a Caliphate? Drawing from Islamic teachings and contemporary perspectives, Mufti Taqi Uthmani provides a comprehensive analysis on this critical topic.
🖥️ Explore Our Course: Islam and Politics - An Introduction
Dive deeper into the intersection of Islam and politics with our expertly curated course. Understand the historical and contemporary nuances of political thought in Islam. Enroll now to gain a well-rounded perspective on these pivotal issues.
🔗 Enroll Now: courses.turath...
📚 Recommended Reading:
Check out our highly recommended book, "Islam and Politics: An Introduction" by leading scholars. This book offers valuable insights and is an essential resource for anyone interested in the relationship between Islam and political systems.
🔗 Learn More: turath.co.uk/p...
📱 Follow Us on Social Media for More Updates:
Twitter: @TurathBooks
Instagram: @turathpublishing
TikTok: @turathpublishing
Don't forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more enlightening content!
#muftitaqiusmani #khilafat #elections
Bloodshed while fighting for Khilafah
VS
Bloodshed while existing without a Khilafah 🩸
Today the bloodshed is happening because of the disputes between muslims and others and while adopting a Khalifa there will be a bloodshed between muslims and Muslims as it happened in the past.
4:39 Thats what he is trying to say. No country's government will adopt khalifa while leaving his own governance but with a severe bloodshed between muslim countries.
Then it will be bloodshed between muslim countries without khilafa
And today there is bloodshed between muslims and others.
And just think when a war will happen between muslim countries they will get more power or they will get more weaker. Then only way to bring saudi turkey egypt iran and other islamic states under one umbrella can only happen after they follow basic principles of isalm, they prioritise islamic profit rather there own. Thats what mufti has said.
@@al-islahcreations3350 there are many other ways of establishing a Khilafah while also minimising Muslim bloodshed.
Establishing an islamic lobby in democratic countries, finding other similar ways for dictatorship countries
The common thing in all is to keep spreading awareness. When Muslims know that it is fardh in Islam to establish the Khilafah, and they want to work for it.
Just saying we will get Khilafah when Allah wants and end the discussion is no choice
@@Anand_Official75 Brother thats what mufti has said that khalifa without bloodshed is not possible but when muslim countries follow basic principles of isalm. A government which does not think about anything for their dominance and governance how can they come under when umbrella without basic islamic principales. First listen what he has said then question about any opinion
When he has said about allah will bring khilafa till then wait instead he has said that scholars of different countries should bring governments and kings closer so one can think about Muslims welfare all around the world.
And this isnt possible without baisc islamic principles......
Mufti sahab, the idea of khilafah is difficult. But if we stop talking about it, it will remain difficult. Instead we should raise awareness about it, despite the difficulty
We should raise awareness as in khilafah is in the best interest of muslims and remind people from history as well but if we actively start forming khilafah exactly right now then we’re gonna end up getting consequences that Mufti Sahab pointed out.
those in muslim countries should try talking about this and see what happens. In countries like Tajikistan, kyrgystan, Tunisia, Egypt you can get locked up simply for following islam in your daily life. Stop trying to be a hero, and think/act practically!
Bro not even practicing five times prayers and wants Khilafah 😂
Bro only through awareness you get nothing.
Present some practical road map
Assalamu alaikum Wa Rahmathullah.
It's is very funny to hear that we should advise the Muslim governments to implement the Law of Allah in the land they rule over. If you are going to govern by the law other than that Allah Swt has revealed is become Kafir, Dhalim and Faziq, as per Qur'an. These nation state already submitted to the sovereignty of the UN Security Council and what does that mean? It's blasphemy. Correct me if I'm wrong. If they truly believe in the Unity of Allah, obey His commandments and follow His Holy Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wassallam, and also liberate themselves from the slavery of the Satanic Gog and Magog Civilization of the Zionist West. The prime responsibility of the Muslims live today is to strive hard for the revival of the Khilafat. There is no Islam without a Jama'at and there is no Jama'at without an Ameer. It's very clear that the Khilafat can only be reestablished with the Divine intervention and through a Meavenly Man.
We have to educate people to get ready to support that Man when He is emerged.
Kassimsaleem@gmail.com
Establishment of Khilafah is only possible after the Muslim Ummah is revived on the basis of the Islamic Aqeeda.
This means that the Ummah should first of all understand the following:
1. Secularism i.e. separation of religion and state is a non-Islamic concept, since Islam is applicable on all public and state matters.
2. Nationalism i.e. forming a bond on the basis of ethnicity, area, language, race etc. is contradictory to Islamic bond of Aqeeda.
3. Democracy (sovereignty of the people) has nothing to do with Islam, since in Islam sovereignty belongs to Sharia, not to the majority opinion.
✌️🖤
@@hasanshirazi9535 trust me muslims know all this, but too cowardly to fight due to the love of the world and hate for death as the Prophet said.
Modern muslims are PhD in talks only, Hencewhy the Prophet said, there will be a lot of khateeb at the end times.
The problem is That if the Khalifa is a idiot or a incompetente we have to deal whith him Forever
@@rvrv7021 You get what you select. However if Khalifah violates sharia, his order can be challenged in the court and he can even be removed from office.
Why were there so many Arab tribes?. Why was not tribalism abolished?
May Allah bless our scholars. If people had a clue the fiqh and aqeedah they taught us that gave us clarity, these things would make sense. It’s like Shaykh Al Albani said, this religion is not based on emotions. People get emotional about these topics, but we have fiqh in everything to do things correctly. People think they now and talk down the Shaykh, don’t realize how ignorant and foolish they are. If they led a country it would crumble overnight. Our scholars are a blessing. Thank you for sharing.
Exactly. Islam is not based on emotions. So look at the solutions given in the Qur'aan and Sunnah which were implimented by the Sahaabah. To speak about the Fiqh of times is a distraction. Alhamdulillaah, I've studied Fiqh so I know what is written there. It's not written you can or can't and that there's a choice. What's written is you Have to do it, and here's the periphery laws governing the outcomes. Read the works of Imam Muhammad ash-Shaybaani. What's based on emotions, namely fear, is this imaginary Fiqh which says you can't fight because you're too weak. That's based on emotions. The Qur'aan says if you're 10 you can overcome 100, if you're 100 you can overcome 1000, and it becomes completely Haraam to run despite those odds. Tell that to cowards these days and they'll tell you the Fiqh of running. So it's not based on emotions to repeat the words of Allaah and Rasoolullaah Sallallaahu Alayhi Wa Sallam, it's emotional to find excuses to avoid the solutions.
He’s talking about having to kill other Muslims!!! Are you mad??? You want to destroy the earth with people who don’t pray Fajr so people who won’t wake up for Fajr, wake up for Fajr???
So what's the fiq of re establishing khilafa?
@@mohammad20412 And certainly he's not well versed in the Fiqh of re-establishment of Khilāfah; he totally gave answer based on his emotions and limited mind which shows his ignorance or his corruption to the Taghūt he's living under
Jazakallah.Allah۔ yes our scholar are more more knowledgeable then we fragile muslims۔ we should follow great scholar like mufti taqi usmani sahib
Excellent & Logical Answer. Ma-Shaa-ALLAH عزوجل ! ! ! Keep on preaching ISLAM without any Sectarianism. May ALLAH عزوجل guide all of us towards his path of TRUTH. Aameen ! ! ! My Salute for all the TRUTH Lovers. Al-hamduLILLAH عزوجل ! ! !
Buzdill darty khoon bahany aur behny se. Tum LOGIC Lana akhrat mein hum FAITH layenge.
@@aqeelokii have a question will you answer it??
@@biggboss9930 why not
@@aqeeloki meray bhai aap ko kis na roka ha aap agr samajhtay hn k ya sahi time ha to ap ya comment ku kar rahay hn
aap BismiLLah karen or sab sa pehlay apna khoon bahayen
Insha'Allah ma aap ke Namaz e Janaza parhun ga
Agar aap buzdil ke ya definition kartay hn to sab sa baray buzdil aap hn maazrat k sath
@@aqeelokikon si khilafat sunni vrelvi ir ahle ahle hadees khilafat
Mufti Taqi Usmani sb is a very respected figure. However, saying that the establishment of the Khilafah will lead to the bloodshed of the Muslims gives an assumption that Muslims are not being killed today. 40000 in Gaza in less than a year, over 300000 in Syria, over 300000 Muslims killed by US in Iraq. Muslims are being killed because of the lack of the Khilafah now, as that Khilafah was supposed to be the shield of the Muslims.
He means
Bloodshed of muslim by muslim.
There is a huge difference in both
@@hafizabdulwahab2426 Hezbollah killed thousands in Syria along with Turkey, USA, and Russia.
Pakistan killed thousands of Muslims on the false premise of "terrorism". Muslim puppet rulers are already killing Muslims. And it will continue untill there is no Khaleefa to protect us
@@atifahmed9233The problem is secular people
@@hafizabdulwahab2426 and where and when did he mention that?. I can also say you mean America and the enemy of Islam can decide to kill one billion Muslims but khilaafa should only be encouraged when Muslims start to kill themselves. So, he never said what you are insinuating. I agree with mufti with the steps in achieving a khilaafa but don't suggest the idea that muslims are not being killed worldwide. We are witnessing a genocide of the muslims in our lifetime already.
@@hafizabdulwahab2426 aren’t Muslims killing and robbing and looting Muslims now? Specially the so-called leaders of Muslim countries?
The best thing is learn quran and hadith and apply each and everything in your life , this will make every muslim same and when the thinking match we can make changes without bloodshed, specially we need to focus on things which are common in every muslim
Thanks Sheikh, for giving a real solution, because this is not a matter of emotions.
"Real" 😂 what a stupid way to put his answer.
(Edit)
There's already bloodshed and there will be bloodshed regardless. I assume the best of our Mufti but the stances of our scholars today are weak. I hate to admit it but I am weak and dread the sacrifice that's needed for the ummah. But I wonder if the post colonial dawah and Islamic studies has effected how I and many other Muslims were raised. If the scholars are not strong, what can we expect from the followers?
“The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools.”
He didn't confirm confirm you're erroneous understanding, therefore therefore he is weak. Perhaps humble yourself and understanding the concept of Shari'ah law and khilafah before writing off senior scholars
Your perspective isn't strong enough to even be considered weak.
Knowing your situation does not mean you are not willing to sacrifice!
The only sacrifice you know if fighting Muslims?!
Whose side are you on again?!
Calm down. Be reasonable and less judgemental.
@@bananaman7638 perhaps I'm not the only one inneed of humbling
@@user-vy3hb7ir6o I literally don't even know what you just said
@@TN-kg2lv as soon as we say we don't need humbling...then we got a bigger problem.
The Seerah tells us that the Prophet Muhammad SAW took Nusrah(material support) from Ansars(Aws and Khasraj). Following the seerah would require to get Nussrah from people of Power(probably from Armed forces) to establish khilafat.
Okey
Where is your work for kilafat?
Following the seerah, first of all correct concepts have to be adopted by the Ummah. And this is clearly lacking. Jumping to nusrah without doing the necessary daawah is going against the seerah and a recipe for disaster.
There is great wisdom in that answer. Instead of trying to directly jump from 1st floor to 100th floor and inevitably failing, one needs to go up the floors one-by-one for far better odds of reaching the 100th floor.
Learn seerah again and understand the Fiqh of Khilāfah. He's making emotional and UnIslamic claims & nonsensical solution to keep the Bātil Kufriya status-quo. Such a sold out scholar it seems.
@@mdfahd24 Alhamdulillah I've read Seerah and I know that before the Stage of initiating Foundation of Islamic state in Madinah there is a 13 year Makki Struggle in which swords were not taken out and strength was gained through preaching only. Insha'Allah when we'll reach the threshold of Standing out militarily then we'll do it. If in your opinion it's necessary to start the combat now, then go and do it. No one has stopped you by force, you are not even raising your voice and blaming those who are atleast raising their voices.
@@user-qqreycf
Reaching a threshold of standing out militarily? Lmao ? In which of the ghazwa did Prophet Mohammad pbuh and his companions stood out militarily? Please englighten me ? What about fighting the Persians, Romans and Byzantines? Were muslims well equipped? More in number? The problem with current muslims is they are all cowards
@@user-qqreycfdid Rasul pbuh accept the existing system during that 13 years time of his struggle in makkah or He denied the system of kufr that existed at that time and tried to change it to a new one like that of Medina?
@@infinixfinix7590 That's what I'm saying. Muhammad S.A.W denied the system by His Holy words and did Dawah. Muhammad S.A.W did not raise the Sword during Makki period but when enough force was collected then foundation of the state of Madinnah was held.
So mufti sahab saying bringing back Khil8f8 is difficult not impossible or ghair shari
So among two difficults why not choose right difficult and restore Khil8f8
Right you are brother💖 from Bangladesh...!!!
Assalamualaikum.
Bro To achieve khilafa directly require a lot of difficulties but he is explaining the way to achieve that purpose.
You have to understand that he is a grat scholar and his work is research only, so their words are important and we need to think about these ideas given by Mufti sahab.
How will you chose a khalifa ? What's the method ? How will you chose a khalifa that will be a pure Muslim because the Muslims having different sects don't even consider other Muslims, pure Muslims ?
Alhumdulillah mufti Takki usmani great scholar ... he's like the genius of this umnah ...
He is scared
Currently all states are following democratic parinciples..My question is is there democracy in islam,(western democracy)..And how is implementing shariah possible if there is no blood shed..However we know that Hazrat abu bakr r.a slaughtered the people who refused to pay zakah..There are lot more questions but kindly give me answers of these questions please..
Sheikh ul arab wal ajam Sheikh ul Islam Hazrat Mufti Taqi Usmani Damat Barkatuhum 🇵🇰❤️🇵🇸
What a crap
Our benchmark is Quran and seerah of Rasolullah SAW.
فَٱحْكُم بَيْنَهُم بِمَآ أَنزَلَ ٱللَّهُ ۖ وَلَا تَتَّبِعْ أَهْوَآءَهُمْ عَمَّا جَآءَكَ مِنَ ٱلْحَقِّ ۚ
So judge between them by what Allah has revealed, and do not follow their desires over the truth that has come to you.
With due respect mufti sb has NO proof of his opinion from Islam. What he has in his mouth are his whims and desires and stick of namalom afrad. Fear Allah !
😂
He doesn't deserve that title. specially after this biased and nonsensical UnIslamic answer.
I always wonder why muslims of subcontinent are fond of giving lots of palatial titles to their mashaikh !!!!!!
I never saw arabs and European muslims doing that !!!!
People have to learn what the scholars have said for a while. Even Shaykh Al Albani says similar. Think about it this way: 2 stages the Muslims can be in. Meccan period: not having the upper hand over the disbelievers, not having the resources or the strength, being oppressed. In this period we should focus on dawah, learning, teaching, being patient. In the Madinah period it is a time for strength, for fighting, for power, for implementing laws. But we are weak. What do we have to offer right now? We are struggling to hold onto our own religion let alone a weapon. We should study, build our deen, fight our desires and nafs, pray our 5 prayers, learn the sunnah, teach others, call others, be patient and one day when Allah sees we are ready He will open the doors for us. Right now we can’t even agree on basic aqeedah points. Sad. Go learn Quran and Sunnah. Actually. Correctly. Not you think you know and you’re actually ignorant.
Yes in makkah our prophet and its sahabah are continuously struggling and in makkah give blood and everthing which they can and now we use makkah life for shield that prophet saww not fight or jihaad yeah true but continously struggling you do not run or only teaching and learning and guiding but you also speak out to government that you are wrong and we struggle until islamic sharya is not implemented if you kill us come on but we do not move from our path today scolar lose their strengh that we are in makkahi life so only offer prayer and teach and learn 😂this not true brother
Prophet muhammad (saw) was fighting against kuffar but today is different.all of Arabia is almost muslim now and around 58 countries have Muslim majority as population.if today's muslim were true to its faith Muslims should be ruled under Khalifa unfortunately which isn't.leave Khalifa aside these Muslims of 58 countries should have helped people in Palestine and gaza.today Muslims are totally obsalate,worthless.i fear that Allah might replace us Muslims with new Muslims who will be better Muslims than us.
People dont know fiqh dont understand this answer
Munafiq
@@HappyForestTrees-si8lx some things dont need fiqh, its just common sense, modern mullah and their fiqh this fiqh that has gotten them no where, Kashmir, burma, Palestine are still suffering but they are busy who has a degree in fiqh.
He is not even referring fiqh, he is doing rational argument instead of referring shariah. He refer Sharia only in namaz rozah haj zakat not in political mattera
It's literally far from the Fiqh of Islām in this answer. He's using his limited mind to justify his nonsensical answer which has nothing to do with the methodology of re-establishment of Khilāfah ala Minhajun Nabuwah.
@@syedumerqadri9852 True.
His premise was establishing khalifa straightforward will cause bloodshed. Right? But what he later proposed and hoped for will most definitely cause bloodshed too. Being afraid of that means your hope will forever stay a hope. And in the meantime the nation are going more astray.
He’s just being diplomatic and careful with his answer . We all know this . We shouldn’t expect all scholars to be extremely bold. That’s not the age we live in
@@k.m.clarke yes we love to live in an age of soothsayers. Frankly brother that's not the cure for 'WAHN'.
It’s very intelligent and good to publicly encourage gradual acceptance of the principles , and a cooperative transition, when we all know it’s gonna be a bloodbath .
What EXACTLY have Pakistan been doing for past 8 decades? UnIslamic approach towards re-establishment of Khilāfah takes you nowhere.
@@mdfahd24 the kinds of people who would reestablish khilafah on earth would be doers , not talkers. “Vocal” politics gets nowhere , power is established by the sword.
the respected mufti is suggesting gradualism, where nations first implement laws based on Quran and sunnah before khilafah is established. The question one needs to ask is if this approach being suggested is based on quran and sunnah.
It is ... The Prophet ( saw ) worked on the imaan and strengthening it in the Sahaabae kiraam for over a decade..
At the Conquest of Makka ( 8AH ) muslims were strong militarily and in their imaan and implementation of sharia...
Then the Khulafaa Khilaafah started ( 632 until 661 ) ..
Expanded by the day....
Muslims gained strength year by year..
Yes it's based on Qur'an and sunnah read the seerah and one could figure out islam didn't spread all of a sudden hazrat umar didn't became Khalifa and conquered lands all of a sudden
It took tarbeeyat this transition doesn't come abruptly
There is just one thing I need to ask the esteemed scholar, my question is not on from where did you get the methodology of establishing caliphate that u mentioned? It’s also not a question on please provide evidences from Quran and Sunnah on the method of establishing an Islamic state like you explained? Its also not a question on what is the legitimacy of the claim that if we work towards establishing a caliphate there will be bloodshed of Muslims (because today not a single drop of sacred Muslim blood is shed anywhere at all on planet earth)? It’s also not a question on the liability of all atrocities committed against Islam and Muslim in the absence of caliphate, it’s a very straightforward question
Why, oh my esteemed scholar (whose books on taqleed I love), why don’t you use the power, popularity and authority that Allah has bestowed you with (that you will be questioned about) to call your sons, brothers, friends and family in the Muslim armies to remove support for rulers in the Muslim world (slaves of Washington or wannabe slaves of Moscow) and give that power to the people who have the capability and ability to establish the caliphate? What stops you from doing that
And while you make that call tell them (your followers in the armed forces) to NOT spill blood because bloodshed for the establishment of caliphate is not at all allowed in Islam! And while you use your abilities to make this call to those who actually are the most powerful entity of the world (Muslim armies) and are capable to make Islam the world order like it was always, why don’t you use evidences from sources of shariah.
You can chose to do that or be replaced by scholars who fulfil their roles to be the inheritors of the prophet ﷺ
Be like the scholars who supported Salahuddin not the ones who tried to stop him from liberating Al Aqsa with the fear of bloodshed
May Allah guide you and truly guide many through you ameen
Haven't you already seen the result of doing what you propose? What happened to Lal Masjid? They did exactly what you are proposing but the state machinery crushed them under their feet so easily that burnt their bodies with Phosphorus bombs. And an honest question from you. Do you really think that majority of his followers are so steadfast that they are ready to sacrifice everything? Laal masjid is not the only case in history. You can find many other cases.
And why do you think Maulana's proposal is impractical? He is also talking about Khilafa but through a gradual process that will slowly but surely ensure its implementation. Will it be wrong if 100% shariah law is implemented through democratic movements? Why is it not acceptable as an interim solution to be replaced by khilafah at an appropriate time?
@@nabeelshamshad1654 I must say that you have no freaking idea of what I am proposing here. And no, it is not at all even remotely close to what lead to the tragic and horrific Lal masjid massacre. But you know what, this is exactly what some state appointed (read sponsored) clerics want us to imagine whenever someone says the forbidden words ‘implement Islam on state level’, so it’s not really your fault in directly assuming that this can be the only thing that is proposed.
Do you know what was the ONE common factor in Lal masjid massacre in Pakistan, Rabaa massacre in Egypt against the democratic ikhwan, and the Algeria massacre against the democratic Islamic Salvation in 1990? Let me remind you of that ONE core common Factor in all these three cases, it was that the scholars did not have the support of the Muslim armies. In the last two cases, they tried to work through democracy (which you are seemingly enticed with) and the scholars even had huge support in all other Muslim groups (academics, physicians, judiciary etc) but they were not allowed to work in the Muslim armies.
Ignoring the Muslim armies was a huge mistake that lead to bloodshed and should never be repeated. The state machinery is to be reinstalled but this time with the correct software (Islam in its true original form).
Ask yourself what lead to the establishment of the city state of Madinah? Was it democracy or was it gradualism? It was when the ansar accepted Islam and gave protection and power to the messenger ﷺfor the establishment of Islam. Where is the bloodshed in all of this??? Why would there be bloodshed today if the Muslim armies do exactly what the Ansar did? Why should we invent scenarios in our head when we have a clear methodology and knowledge of its exact outcomes from the seerah?
Have you ever asked who fiercely guards the fence between the ummah and the Muslim armies?
Why western think tanks have special interest and microscopic focus to maintain control over Muslim armies through some slaves of Washington in the civil and military elites in the Muslim world?
Those are some intelligent questions to ask.
Remember when the Muslim armies are not used For the protection of Islam and Muslims, they are ruthlessly being used Against Islam and Muslims.
So let me spell out exactly what is proposed.
I am reminding the esteemed scholar to warn the sincere elements in the Muslim armies to remove their support from those who implement anything but Islam (western liberal democracy or tyrant authoritarian regimes) and give support to the establishment of Islam to the people who are prepared to implement the systems of Islam in its true original form (not a caricature of sharia)
That’s it! Simple as that.
And there should be absolutely no shedding of blood in the process because shedding of blood or armed struggle to establish the deen is not the method of our beloved ﷺ and the esteemed scholar should strongly reinforce that.
I am advocating for a purely intellectual struggle to establish the deen and I am NOT advocating armed struggle because it is not what we see in Seerah nabawi ﷺ
Asking for power and protection to establish the deen is the method of Rasoolullah ﷺ and it is not at all a proposal invented by me.
It is NOT allowed for us to support the 57 divisions of the ummah in nations with borders drawn by colonial masters. Does the scholar not know the Hadith that does not allow Muslims to have more than one ruler? Does he or does he not??? It is an obligation for us to unite the ummah under one leader that governs us only by Islam (divine laws) and not a constitution with man made laws.
Lastly, Why I am not ok with gradualism is because this is not the method of Rasoolullah ﷺ but a pathetic excuse to justify one’s inaction ridden by a fear to challenge the status quo
@@Kkt-3496 well to tell you the truth, no one will come if he calls them.
@@asadahmed4993 well, that’s never been a reason to not state the facts specially if you are ‘hailed’ as the scholar and you know for sure what the facts are. No one is accountable for those who don’t respond to the truth. And rather than been used as a puppet for crucial negotiations with the taliban when things get out of hands after the stupid foreign policy initiatives by the government, this ‘esteemed’ scholar can surely think of ways in making his conduct more effective. Deen is nasihah, no one depends on him anyways
قُلِ ٱللَّهُمَّ مَـٰلِكَ ٱلْمُلْكِ تُؤْتِى ٱلْمُلْكَ مَن تَشَآءُ وَتَنزِعُ ٱلْمُلْكَ مِمَّن تَشَآءُ وَتُعِزُّ مَن تَشَآءُ وَتُذِلُّ مَن تَشَآءُ ۖ بِيَدِكَ ٱلْخَيْرُ ۖ إِنَّكَ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَىْءٍۢ قَدِيرٌۭ
Say, "O Allāh, Owner of Sovereignty, You give sovereignty to whom You will and You take sovereignty away from whom You will. You honor whom You will and You humble whom You will. In Your hand1 is [all] good. Indeed, You are over all things competent
إِنَّمَآ أَمْرُهُۥٓ إِذَآ أَرَادَ شَيْـًٔا أَن يَقُولَ لَهُۥ كُن فَيَكُونُ
All it takes, when He wills something ˹to be˺, is simply to say to it: “Be!” And it is
أَمَّن يُجِيبُ ٱلْمُضْطَرَّ إِذَا دَعَاهُ وَيَكْشِفُ ٱلسُّوٓءَ وَيَجْعَلُكُمْ خُلَفَآءَ ٱلْأَرْضِ ۗ أَءِلَـٰهٌۭ مَّعَ ٱللَّهِ ۚ قَلِيلًۭا مَّا تَذَكَّرُونَ
Or ˹ask them,˺ “Who responds to the distressed when they cry to Him, relieving ˹their˺ affliction, and ˹Who˺ makes you successors in the earth? Is it another god besides Allah? Yet you are hardly mindful
We believe the Khalifa of Allah will be appointed soon to rid the world of evil and injustice across the globe (specifically in Palestine)
When everything seems impossible, We need to continue holding on to our Dua, know that there is a Allah, who makes things possible by simply saying “kun” (“be” and it is)
We are from Bangladesh want Khilafah and want to join with muslim world under Khilafah.
Ma Sha Allah nice grip over English!
Strange, when discussing about the topic of khilafah or an Islamic State, these, Big scholars suffer from Amnesia.
Did not the Messenger of Allah sought Miltary Power from the Ansaar, and took blood oath from them, and then used that strength to FORCEFULLY establish Islamic State in Medina? ...He (saw) was ready to fight for it if it comes down to it, hence the blood oath!
Also the fact that he was so FOCUSED to eatablish the state that he gave it hiegiest priority, as this was ordained by Allah (saw).
So why are these so called great Mufties and acholars hell bent on avoiding the greatest and most important sunnah of Messenger (saw)? Why cant they give it importantce just like the Messenger(saw)?
What betrayel this is...!!!!
You lover of blood shed. You have wrong guidance. Thats why non islamic national are afraid of the rise of Islam. This scholar is good atleast he has the thought of avoiding blood shed. God bless him and his house.
😅,
Firstly in the blood oath with ansar madina is not the bloodshed of muslim by muslim.
Also why are you not working on kilafat
Is it not your duty?
The blood oath was to tackle anyone that may stand in opposition to the messenger (saw) when he assumes power in Medina as well as deffending him and islam from attacks.
If muslims who hold secular values, identities and constitutions. And stands opposing the idea of establishing islam and khilafah. Then islam has an answer to their opposition. Islam recognises them as ta'ifah mumtani'ah. It would be wise for u to learn what this means and what is the islamic verdict on such people.
If such so called muslims insist to fight for secularism. Then why should he hold back to establish islam?
@@hafizabdulwahab2426 who told you that he is not working on khilafat. How do you know if he is doing it or not.. he doesn't have to show you even if he is doing it.. Don't make assumptions
100% agree with mufti Shahab
😂
According to the authentic teachings of Islam, "Practicality" comes after the Obligations (Faraiz ) under the topic of permissibility (Mubahaat). Obligations can not be dismissed if apparently they do not seem to be practical, they are to be obeyed irrelevant to the consequences.
While Khilafah is the Mother of all Obligations. Imam Al-Qurturbi (ra) said, “The KHILAFAH is the pillar upon which other pillars rest.”
It is more than obvious today that in the absence of the Khilafah all the sanctities, including the blood & honor of Muslims & the rules of Islam are perished.
Authentic Hadeeth says "Ulema are inheritors of the Prophets", so the true & legitimate inheritors will be those Ulema who remind Muslims of their Obligations, & Mother of Obligations, instead of diverting & dismissing them & advising the Muslims to remain attached to post Colonial Systems & Constitutions.
Because today the systems & the constitutions in all 57 Muslim countries are the outcome of the Colonial Rule, the tools, through which Colonial powers are totally controlling them.
Prophetic Method To re-establish the Khilafah is through the Nussrah (Material Support) of the Ahl-e-Nussrah (the people of Power), & today Ahl-e-Nussrah are the Military Men.
Just like the Ahl-e-Nussrah of Yethrib (Madina-al-Munawwarah), Ahl-e-Nussrah of Today should be called to fulfill this Duty (which is obligatory upon them too ! ), and as a result the first Islamic State was established with a Bloodless procedure.
So we call you Janab Taqi Usmani Sahib & all the Ulema of today that be the righteous & legitimate inheritors of the Prophet ﷺ, and stick to the Prophetic Method to establish the Khilafah. And Do Not remain subjugated to the Post Colonial Rule !
This is such an amazing response to this video
You have highlighted some important facts
The one thing I find interesting is that the west is so scared of the unification of the ummah under the banner of Islam , and taking all effective measures to prevent it, these ulemas (may Allah guide them and may they speak with the basirah, hikmah and courage) still saying it’s not practical!
What’s practical then?
Ofcourse the thing mentioned here in this video is compatible with the status quo!
This is the only thing you can do. You can not implement shariah without in Pakistan while sitting in Iraq.
Make efforts in your own country, do protest, ask governments, and adopt every possible way within the limits of shariah to implement shariah in your country like Taliban did in Afghanistan.
But this can not be done without doing, ask ALLAH to choose you and INSHA ALLAH it will happen one day.
Join the people who are loyal and already doing, if there is no one in your country then stand by yourself and ask people to join you.
SubhanAllah you speak about sparing bloodshed of Muslims as if Muslims around the world are not being killed. For how long will we watch our brothers and sisters die before we realize Khilafah is the only solution? How long will scholars hide away from the haqq?
May Allah bless you shaikh ❤
It is practical today as it was practical in the time of first khilafah in the first era of Islam because the nature of Islam has never changed similarly the nature of kufr and kuffar has never changed. Not to FORGET that the khilafah was never wrapped up with Rose and sweets and it will never be how Mufti sab thinks.
ولن ترضى عنك اليهود ولا النصارى حتى تتبعوا ملتهم.
We can start by implementing a system in our country which can a role model for other Muslim countries to follow..Bloodshed is inevitable.. Influential people like Mufti sb can take the lead.
Accepting and reconciling with the system is not ok.
You know the government and hypocritical people will not allow this, the armed forces will immediately suppress us, we need the support of the armed forces
In Indonesia there was a group to gather the power of the caliph and you know what happened, they were immediately muzzled by the government and hypocrites
@@Rifqutpimartian obviously we have to play smart.. keep it hidden for some time
until we have numbers and influential people.
As much i wanted the Sheikh to be decisive and strong on the matter he is not saying khilafah is not possible and poking holes about its history like some have done recently
all he is saying that essentially there needs to be a starting point an nation or nation's that implement the shariah and then the reunification of the ummah will be easier.
But to think they will he no bloodshed in even this scnerario thats wishful thinking
Khilafah with artificial borders
Yes he’s just being careful with his answer . Not worth making bold political statements on camera when you can provide more benefit for the Muslims in other ways
Asking nationstates to be Islamic is inherently impractical.
A nation state is a glorified qureshi tribal state.
What the mufti is saying is not only impractical, it's impossible.
He is clearly a Munafiq
@@user-pp6nj5lu7vwatch your word...even if u disagree with him don't accuse him ofmunafiq
@@tazboy1934 better you watch your Iman
@@user-pp6nj5lu7v nobody asks you who's and who's not, and who are you to judge peoples eman?
@@pearl328 I am a Muslim and I care for Islam and Muslims.
Shocking answer from the sheikh. It's obviously from he's mind and not from Quran and Sunnah
He has authored a book called Islam & Politics.
@@syedfaisalali3839which again lacks evidence from Quran and Sunnah
So what? Did he know millions muslim got killed all ready .@syedfaisalali3839
One thing we all should keep in mind that the democracy in Pakistan is different than the across democratic world. Democracy means opinion by majority people will be the law. But in Pakistan we have such pro Islamic constitution that no other Islamic country have. In Pakistan's constitution, contrary to Quran and Sunnah can not be the law and will be dropped even by majority Parliament. So, we should have revive our constitution rather than folding democracy(Islamic).
Mufti Taqi Usmani is great Scholar
How so? He is scared
❤❤❤ mufti Taqi is one man army❤❤
Mufti sahab is saying that the idea of national states is unislamic but at same time saying right now is not the time for khilafah. So is he implying we remain satisfied with the unislamic idea of nation states or should we condemn the idea of nation states?
He didn't say right now is not the time for khilāfah rather he said people are not mentally ready for it. Bloodshed will be caused. So at this moment scholars in their capacity and ourselves should make an effort to implement sharia law in our respective countries. This is the solution to bloodless battle for khilafa among Muslims according to Mufti saheb.
@@alTursi05When do you think people will be ready? Did RasūlAllah asked everyone in Medina? Including Jews & Pagans which made up majority of Medina, before establishing a State? You only need approval of Ahlul Halli Wal Aqd and then a transition period starts which People have to accept whether they like it or not. You've been fooled by UnIslamic answer like what weak mentality Mufti Taqi usmani is giving right now.
@mdfahd24 adab with your disagreement, dear brother. Who is ahlul hil wa al-aqd in our time?
The Muslims gonna have to agree about that also habib. It's not that simple.
@@mdfahd24 with regards to RasūlulLah صلى الله عليه وسلم not asking anybody, it's a very different story, the landscape was very different. We should deal with history in their own context and not commit the error of presentism.
Only a scholar having deep understanding of fiqh can answer like this. Great answer !
MASHA ALLAH, SPEAKING ZABARDAST ENGLISH
lOl 😂😂😂😂😂
InshaAllah ❤
Revival is best solution at this stage!!!❤❤❤
Brilliant answer
Ma shaa Allah
Fi Aamanillah Ya Muslimin.
Bringing all Muslims under one Kalifah is nothing just a laymen thinking...
Only Allah can appoint his shadow caliph of the earth. If it something people choose its democracy and when people choose agree and disagree is there! Adam ,ibrahim ,david etc the prophets wasn't appointed by people but Allah ! We have seen pros and cons of peoples khilafah from rashidun to ottoman. Infact some saltanat decleared their own khilafah and Caliphs. People need to study whats caliph and khiladah actually from holy Qur'an not from misleading scholars or ottoman drama fan pages and their scholars.when Allah appoints his caliph there will be no disunity among muslims! Period
Does it mean Working to Establish Islam through Khilafah is a matter of choice ? Till now, I new that Working to Establish Islam is Fardh. Subhan Allah.
With all due respect, Please give Daleel to what you are saying?
Unfortunately what you said contradicts the Shariah. You are assuming everything and coming to a conclusion which is against basic Islamic Usool. Muslims living across the Muslim world are ready to break their borders and unite under Islamic Khilafah. This is what many independent report says.
So Is he saying "Bloodshed is worse than fitna/kufr"...just asking...
No. He is saying that the suggested shortcut approach will only lead to greater fitna/kufr than what we have today.
Bloodshed is also fitna.
Both are same bloodshed included as fitna
There's been nothing but bloodshed in the Muslim world for decades. Makes you wonder which world mufti lives in.
Maybe it's just his blood he fears might be shed. Not the millions of innocent Muslims that have died in Palestine, kashmir, Bosnia, Iraq Afghanistan, Yemen, somalia, Pakistan.........
@@MazharKhan-mv5mp ignorant
Basically the question is how the scholars and people should try??? As he mentioned we should go back to khilafa, if we go back in history we see the Ghazwats.
It's mean that we are not even at first stage of khilafah then why we did not start the struggle of khilafah before when we today we need it this is the fault of Muslim scholars when we would be at final stage of khilafah we are talking about first stage. Palestine and all other oppressed Muslim brothers and sisters around the world need us and it is only done through khilafah for God sake start struggling for khilafah from today
Actually what mufti is saying is also that when Muslim countries will follow the shariah it will eventually become khilafah in every country but it will not be global.
Khilafa can never be achieved through hanafi madhab especially because of their fatwa that the person who does not pray salah but just utter the word of sahada is still a muslim. This fatwa will never be able to make good muslim nation or group who believe in allah firmly. There is no way but to follow the salaf. The ulama of hanafi fiqh are among the salaf but they are not the only salaf. The problem begins when the Alims, muftis also follow hanafi fiqh blindly and they don't weight to the other fiqh while the way of the salaf is that we should follow quran and sunnah. I'm not saying that civilians should not follow. Hanafi fiqh, indeed they should do but the ulema should not follow blindly that we see in many country
Which Fiqh declares someone Kaafir just because they are sinner?
Last time I read, it was the belief of Khawaarij who consisdered someone who commits a fisq a kaafir.
Can you please tell me something contrary to Hanafi Fiqh which says a sinner becomes kaafir? Out of any of Maaliki, Shafyie, Hambali?
@@FaizanKhan-um6bnFasiq people are cursed by Allah in the Qur'an
Masha Allah may Allah give him 950 years of life. And I am sure he will be on same stand. And he will be giving same verdict then also.😂.
@@learnarabic2567 True😂😭
Shameless youngsters wouldn't comprehend the Hikmah here.
Implement Islamic Sharia, that's the best answer given by Mufti scholar.
We can't even implement Sharia in our lives, not in our homes 🏡. How can we implement Sharia law in our country/Nation state ?
Is it time for offering 5 times Namaz in a single day? Will you see practicality or see the hukm and act in best way possible to complete the hukm
"Try to.." ? 😅
No, say the should; they must !!
JazaakAllah!
In the past there had never been the Muslim ummah under one khalifa. During the Umayyad caliphate,, Alivid and Abbasid movements were going on to topple the umayyad caliphate. In the same era there were umayyad caliphate in Andalus, Fatimid caliphate in Egypt and Abbasid caliphate in Baghdad. When the Abbasid caliphate was on the wane the many isolated sultanates had grown up like Ayyubid and Seljuks and they were nominally under the sovereignty of the Abbasid caliphate. In modern times this concept is an illusion.
إعلم أخي الموحد أن قوام هذا الدين بالمصحف والحديد ، قال تعالى:" وانزلنا الحديد فيه بأس شديد ومنافع للناس وليعلم الله من ينصره ورسله بالغيب " ، روي عن جابر بن عبد الله رضي الله عنهما، قال : {أمرنا رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ، أن نضرب بهذا - يعني السيف - من عدل عن هذا - يعني المصحف}
I don't agree with Mufti sahab, As in Namaz, Roza, Hajj, even in Janaza we follow Prophet Muhammad Pbuh and we follow it as it is so why don't we follow directly the prophetic method Minhaj to implement Khilafah state instead of adhering the concept of Nation states. That's not the logical answer and also against Shariah law because Shariah doesn't need the way of Taghoot to implement Khilafah state. Why don't they talk clearly why they keep ummah in confusion. Nation states are created by Kuffar and we adopt it like a sacred thing.. Come on Mufti sahab
06
Сура Аль-Фалак, Сура № 113, «Время нисхождения в Мекку», всего аятов 5.
۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔
Например, магия - это реальность, но это неверие.Алкоголь имеет свой специфический эффект, но запрещен. Точно так же нельзя отрицать реальность и эффективность астрологии, хиромантии (знаний хиромантии) и подсознательных операций (очевидно, когда мы верим в хорошие последствия добрых дел и слов, мы должны принять отрицательные последствия подсознательных и злых слов, и т. д. (Эффективность также должна быть признана), но Шариат запрещает нам использовать такие науки и верить утверждениям, сделанным на основе таких наук. Но шариат запретил нам использовать такие науки и верить утверждениям, сделанным на основе таких наук. Очевидно, что все подобные вещи не могут быть ни эффективными, ни вредить кому-либо без разрешения Аллаха Тааля. Поэтому самый простой и эффективный способ избежать их зла - это отдаться человеку под покровительство Всевышнего Аллаха.
۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔
اسی طرح علم نجوم‘ پامسٹری(ہاتھ کی لکیروں کا علم) اور سفلی عملیات کی حقیقت اور تاثیر سے انکار نہیں کیا جا سکتا (ظاہر ہے جب ہم اچھے وظائف و کلمات کی اچھی تاثیر کو مانتے ہیں تو ہمیں سفلی و شیطانی کلمات وغیرہ کی منفی تاثیر کا بھی اقرار کرنا پڑے گا) لیکن شریعت نے ہمیں ایسے علوم سے استفادہ کرنے اور ایسے علوم کی بنیاد پر کیے گئے دعووں پر یقین کرنے سے منع کر دیا ہے۔
ظاہر ہے اس نوعیت کی تمام چیزیں اللہ تعالیٰ کے اذن کے بغیر نہ تو مؤثر ہو سکتی ہیں اور نہ ہی کسی کو نقصان پہنچا سکتی ہیں۔
اس لیے ان کے شر سے بچنے کا آسان اور مؤثر طریقہ یہی ہے کہ انسان خود کو اللہ تعالیٰ کی پناہ میں دے دے۔
آیت ۵ {وَ مِنۡ شَرِّ حَاسِدٍ اِذَا حَسَدَ ٪﴿۵﴾} ’’اور حسد کرنے والے کے شر سے بھی (میں اللہ کی پناہ مانگتا ہوں) جب وہ حسد کرے۔‘‘
ظاہر ہے جب ایک انسان کسی دوسرے انسان سے حسد کرتا ہے تو عین ممکن ہے وہ اپنے حاسدانہ جذبات سے مغلوب ہو کر عملی طور پر بھی اسے نقصان پہنچانے کے درپے ہو جائے۔
حضرت ابوہریرہ رضی اللہ عنہ سے مروی ہے کہ رسول اللہﷺ نے ارشاد فرمایا: ((اَلْعَیْنُ حَقٌّ)) (۱) یعنی نظر لگ جانا برحق ہے۔
چنانچہ حاسدانہ نگاہ بذاتِ خود بھی منفی اثرات کی حامل ہو سکتی ہے ۔
اس لیے حاسد کے شر سے بچنے کے لیے بھی اللہ تعالیٰ کی پناہ کی ضرورت ہے۔
بہرحال جادو‘ٹونے‘ تعویذ گنڈے‘ نظر بد وغیرہ کے اثرات اپنی جگہ مسلم ّہیں۔
سورۃ البقرۃ کی آیت ۱۰۲ میں شیاطین ِجن کا ذکر آیا ہے جو حضرت سلیمان علیہ السلام کے زمانے میں لوگوں کو جادو سکھایا کرتے تھے۔
بلکہ یہ گھناؤنا کاروبار کسی نہ کسی انداز سے ہر زمانے میں چلتا رہا ہے۔
آج بھی ہمارے معاشرے میں بہت سے لوگ ایسی چیزیں سیکھنے سکھانے اور پھر مختلف دعووں کے ساتھ اپنا کاروبار چمکانے میں مصروف ہیں۔
With all due respect to Mufti sahaab of his knowledge and age. Establishing Khilafah is practically very possible whilst expecting to make Nation State Islamic is not only idealistic but also impractical and impossible. There are numerous examples to support this claim and Pakistan being a prime one.
Mufti Taqi sahab said what is practical. But the mad who have no connection with salah is quarelling in comments
Religious leaders must not talk 3:07 politics. Mixing religions and politics is a time bomb. Look after your own country in shambles.
Does Islam teach us to be practical? A Believer cannot be practical. This is what we see in Seerat. Practically it was never possible for the people of the time to beat the super-powers of the time. but believers did it.
With due respect my question to you Mufti Sahab will your reforming Economic system of Islam and making it compatible with Interest based Economy? How are you going to make different countries follow Islam / Khilafat? Explain how it is going to cause bloodshed to bring Muslims under one Roof?
For me khilafah is just a concept, not necessarily under one khalifah, if all of islamic state right now work closely with each other in many sector such as economy, politic, education and many more we will have certain influence in the geopolitics and by this mean it's a "khilafah" by concept not by itself. Firstly we must make a strong coalition like what western country did such as nato, brics, and many more
@@niidaimehokage5731 Your "For me" makes your argument futile. Bring your proof from sources of legislation in Islām (Qur'ān, Sunnah, Ijma' Sahaba and Ijtihad) to discuss any ruling on certain reality like the political system of Muslim world
@@mdfahd24 ok if we want to make an argument based on dalil there's no dalil that explicitly mentioned about khilafah and for it's establishment except what Rasulullah did when leading madinah, so it's one of the thing that Allah leaves for us to make ijtihad, so the essence of khilafah is important than the form itself whether it needed to be only one khalifah or one nation, العبرة بالمقاصد والمعاني لا بالالفاظ والمباني
Only Khilafah is the solution for the human beings. And I stand with Mufti Sahab's stance on how to practically implement khilafah. It is a correct propaganda.
Firstly reestablish the Sharia in your national Constitution. But it'll take time. For not all 52 nations but Pakistan alone to come back to the state of sharia in this democratic rule.
First and foremost goal of Muslim is to save Al Quds, “PRACTICALLY” Not Verbally sitting on mimbers.
So going through the plan Mufti Sahab explained now, best step is to release a major fatwa for mobilization of pak army towards palestin, and this can only be done by people with strong faith. And Allhumdullilah we find this people mostly in masjids.
What there part is to understand the situation and start mobilizing there people towards passing the fatwa for mobilization of the army.
Same kind of technique can be used in changing the Constitution into a sharia based Constitution.
I am saying all the Muslim countries need to come together to form a united form like Europe (and US) made UNO .The counties should be as they are but now called states .In that union all laws should be extracted from Quran and Sunnah which should be implemented across the muslim world.The head of union can be called Supreme leader or Ameer.
Open to critisism
Why every Muslim nation
has different Shariah law's? It seems khilafath is impossible now
Message for those who are saying that we should start combat now and we should start shedding our blood now for the Struggle of Khilafah:
"Alhamdulillah I've read Seerah and I know that before the Stage of initiating Foundation of Islamic state in Madinah there is a 13 year Makki Struggle in which swords were not taken out and strength was gained through preaching only. Insha'Allah when we'll reach the threshold of Standing out militarily then we'll do it. If in your opinion it's necessary to start the combat now, then go and do it. No one has stopped you by force, you are not even raising your voice and blaming those who are atleast raising their voices."
Reaching a threshold of standing out militarily? Lmao ? In which of the ghazwa did Prophet Mohammad pbuh and his companions stood out militarily? Please englighten me ? What about fighting the Persians, Romans and Byzantines? Were muslims well equipped? More in number? The problem with current muslims is they are all cowards
MashaALLAH..... SHEIKH TAQI USMANI DB is 100% CORRECT.... Actually what is he saying is implemenet SHARIYAH which is a CAR and then gradually make Muslims Ready for ONE DRIVER that is KHALEEFAH.... In ISLAM SHARIYAH is ASAL and KHILAFAT is only a Driving Mechanism of SHARIYAH....
Alhamdulillah!!!
Full video?
I Just Don't Understand Where did Mufti Sahab Lost view of OUR PROPHET's SUNNAH OF ESTABLISHING KHILAFAH???
Did he PBUH Shed Blood???
Shouldn't we learn from his sunnah and establish khilafah rather then comming up with Ridculous 5 Year Old Excuses 😊???
IN Quran Allah says Khilafah Will be revived on Sunnat Of Mohammad PBUH and here he is Saying it difficult and first we will do this that and then we would advice and request!!! Really???
Millions of people died under this banner of nation states
Applying Shari'a to every individual is already difficult, let alone establishing a caliph, this takes time
If Allah's laws came into force without martyrdom, then Muhammad (peace be upon him) never raised his sword
No in makki times prophet Muhammad pbuh and sahaba were not allowed to raise hands
but in madini time It was permitted and in each major decisions rasoollah made mashwara. Go by seerah of beloved rasoollah sallallahu alaihi wasallam.
It has hikmah, people need tarbeeyat
First of all we are not united many simple people minds are not ready yet
Mufti sahab is correct if in this we tried for khilafa it will be civil war
Transition doesn't come all of a sudden it took time and tarbeeyat of people
Be practical let's have an example of India here one after the other day mob lynching, hate speeches.... Is common is it the time we should fight directly??? No it will be an idiot step currently
@@User-wf8jx Wherever Islam spread, did everyone follow Islamic law?
Were all people socialists before socialism came to the Soviets?
Were all people capitalist before capitalism came ?
And what is no of Muslim in madina when Muhammad ﷺ becomes king
And what is no Muslim in badr
And Fateh makka
It's not people it's your so called Muslim leaders who don't wants Islamic law
In makki time Muslim have nothing
But at present you have nuclear power
In seerah we need to understand that what is the way of getting power to establish law that the Muhammad ﷺ hade done in madina
Khilafah is only possible if muslims leave sects like shia and suni- Barelvi , deobandi,wahabi . Because if we tell taqi usmani we make wahabi or Barelvi Khalifah , he won't agree so first priority is to leave sects and call ourselves Muslim only .
With due respect, Mufti sahb every wrong act can't be eradicated by Islamic speeches and there needs some laws for inhuman acts like consuming alcohol, adultery, theft, murder etc. Cruelty is erased by strict laws. At the time of Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, how much difficult it was to establish Islamic state. ?
IN Quran Allah says Khilafah Will be revived on Sunnat Of Mohammad PBUH and here he is Saying it difficults and first we will do this that and then we would advice and request!!! Really??? Was it his sunnah??
Actually we shouldn't implement islam rather we should Learn it first😊
The problem is secular people, in Pakistan how many secular people as well as intellectuals, we have to get rid of such people
Now a day's, peoples are are more attracted to taghoot system and they adopt taghoot.
If small groups like shia,deobandi,salafi try to stablish khilafa it is impossible,
Islami Khilafa Zindabad 🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩
Ma sha Allah very good idea
excellent answer
He actually said in other words. İt's allowed to have nation states... And then you can have sharia in them. The democratic nation states implement man's rules not sharia , and they have their own political party interests and corruption as priority. The king ships have no interests. So what he is talking about is impossible to achieve. These systems and people need to be overthrown so why not do it for khilafah and not perpetuate the same system.!!! İt never worked with OİC or even coming together with Gaza ..he is talking the impossible. Khilafah is established in one country first..then expands
We must understand that What the Mufti Saab is saying comes from pragmatic viewpoint as he stated from the begening. In his view the Prophetic State is not practicle in our times.
Like i said they suffer Amnesia, the Prophet (saw) prophecised about the return of the khilafah upon the Methodology of the prophethood.
The Mufti saabs vision is a federation of pesudeo muslim states based upon the sykspicot boundaries.
You must ask yourselves, what the mufti saab states does it match what the Prophet (saw) established? Is it upon the the methodology of the prophethood?
Clearly the Mufti saab lacks clearity in this matter as his words does not match the what we find in the sunnah.
Establishing the khilafah is Fard, hukm shari' matter.
Agar Mulk Hathon Se Jata Hai, Jaye
Tu Ahkam-e-Haq Se Na Kar Be-Wafai
If the territory is being lost let it be lost
You should not be disloyal to God’s commands
Nahin Tujh Ko Tareekh Se Aghi Kya
Khilafat Ki Karne Laga Tu Gadai
Do you not have knowledge of history?
You have started begging for the Khilafah!
Khareedain Na Jis Ko Hum Apne Lahoo Se
Musalman Ko Hai Nanang Woh Padshai
If we do not purchase with our own blood
Such sovereignty is a disgrace to the Muslim!
“Mera Az Shakistan Chuna Aar Nayed
Ke Az Deegaran Khawastan Moumiyai”
“I do not feel as much ashamed of being broken down
As in asking others for mumiya’i for my treatment
-Allama iqbal
transgender, intersex, or eunuch people who live in communities that follow a kinship system known as guru-chela system.
Sahil adeem is on right track, may Allah help him and protect him. ❤
Why not start with Pakistan?
With no disrespect, Mufti Sahab is controlled by Establishment of Pakistan!
In Pakistan, there is just so called Islamic Democracy, everyone knows that Establishment controls everything!
If Mufti Sahab is not giving Fatwa against Establishment (for interfering in Political Matters of Pakistan)
Then it's the question everyone must ask!
Without Islamic System (Khilafah) no Ibadah worths it !!!
Can we have nation states under a khilafa like the united Muslim states?
the question is- do majority of people love Shariah law?
Yes, though they may not act upon it in many matters
Khilafah is the sharia. How can Muslim countries follow sharia in their Constitution and than establish khilafah?
Do we need to gather strength?
People unite with language if Ulema focus on teaching Spoken Arabic language to all the muslims around the world. They will get United and will become a large force to tackle any problem. Ulema doesn't have the intellect to take the initiative. May be muslim should teach Arabic language in schools.
Good
Maulana you can do thing
Napakistan always napakistan 😂
Did Prophet and his companions establish Khilaafah without any “bloodshed”?! You want the west to feed our Khilaafah with a golden spoon or what?!
Bring a reformer like prophet Muhammad and people like his companions who were of strong Iman and built. You people run on emotions not on logic