Mech Rogue Is Totally BUSTED

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ก.ค. 2024
  • VOD: • TITANS Mech Rogue (Aug...
    Watch Live: / chumphs
    Follow on Twitter: / chumphs
    Become a Patron: / chumphs
    Deck Code:
    AAECAaIHBuy6BOigBd7QBbb2Bdj2Ber6BQz3nwThtQT13QTZ0AXV9gW/9wWm+AXm+gWh/AX7/AXn/QW5/gUAAA==
    00:00 Intro
    02:42 Game 1
    05:17 Game 2
    09:58 Game 3
    18:29 Game 4
    21:43 Game 5
    25:27 Game 6
    #TITANS #Hearthstone #ChumpHS
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 128

  • @_haphazard_
    @_haphazard_ 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +153

    Spark bots are basically like One Amalgam Band in pieces, so I’m going to count this as another OAB video fueling Chump’s addiction to the card

    • @wysonlegion5398
      @wysonlegion5398 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But what does the one amalgam band say?

    • @MY-tr7vc
      @MY-tr7vc 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Bleurgh-kaw-heeeeew-A?

  • @zacharyploude4620
    @zacharyploude4620 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    Lab Constructor and Replicating Menace should have their names switched.

  • @hogg156
    @hogg156 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Lab Constuctor is basically Grimmer Patron, an ADVENTURE card, but better. Thats crazy to me how that is now considered balanced enough to be a class card.

    • @aure2549
      @aure2549 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Grimmer Patron with a tribe, magnetic and easy access to every single keyword even perma stealth

  • @corbintheintern6229
    @corbintheintern6229 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +96

    Remember when paying 4 mana for a 4/5 with no abilities was reasonable?

    • @TMeyer-cc9cw
      @TMeyer-cc9cw 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      sounds boring af

    • @PenguinWithInternetAccess
      @PenguinWithInternetAccess 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

      ​@@TMeyer-cc9cw
      Don't diss my boy chillwind yeti like that

    • @_skud
      @_skud 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      ​@@TMeyer-cc9cwthe real fun is innervate coin yeti on one

    • @ninenineninenine407
      @ninenineninenine407 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      No, chillwind yeti was never a good card

    • @vigge111111
      @vigge111111 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      @@ninenineninenine407it was legit a really good 4 drop back in the day

  • @PenguinWithInternetAccess
    @PenguinWithInternetAccess 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    I got killed on turn 4 against this deck this thing should be forbidden by the Geneva Convention

    • @ArkansasHS
      @ArkansasHS 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I got killed on turn 4 by undead Priest

  • @joaovictor_of
    @joaovictor_of 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    That is stupid. The card should cost more or replicate at the start of your turn to allow the opponent to answer it before it snowballs out of control.

  • @hujm9617
    @hujm9617 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    shout out to dirty rat indeed, that priest didn't even have one answer in hand.

  • @isawayto
    @isawayto 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    1:38 My man just had to mention One Amalgam Band

  • @irium_pls
    @irium_pls 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    I wanted to play a miracle-style mech rogue that uses record scratcher to give a big mimiron turn, but it just turns out the aggro version is better, sadly

    • @Discoveryman29
      @Discoveryman29 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Imagine release combo archetype after putting most of the useful combo archetype back to wild, i ve been spamming combo deck for a while trying to make a good deck for it bur nope, i just cant, current combo minion is too costly and can be easily deal with in one turn, better just put combo spell in with asstalor and be done with it

    • @Discoveryman29
      @Discoveryman29 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Like the dang seagull is 1 mana 4 1 rush, and we have a octopus that does nothing for 2

    • @spankychanty3796
      @spankychanty3796 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Discoveryman29 When they announced the combo heavy support for FoL I was just mad they didnt add Foxy fraud to the core set. It seemed like a major oversight. Would have made the mediocre combo cards better.

  • @infantilemewling6801
    @infantilemewling6801 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    When you said "we're jammin' here" I instantly started singing Bob Marley and The Wailers song "Jammin"
    Ooh, yeah! All right!
    We're jammin':
    I wanna jam it wid you.
    We're jammin', jammin',
    And I hope you like jammin', too.
    LOL, good times!

    • @parrotmaster1019
      @parrotmaster1019 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's song sucks listen to real stuff like inferno (Bella poarch)

  • @johngleeman8347
    @johngleeman8347 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Rat on two. A classic blunder.

  • @Vic-ol8hj
    @Vic-ol8hj 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    - Shard of the Naaru entered the chat

  • @BL00D_CREEPIN
    @BL00D_CREEPIN 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    the neutral magnetic legendary is also very strong in this deck if you opponent somehow survives, ive had games where ive had a 12 14 on turn 7

  • @polyjackets8659
    @polyjackets8659 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I see the star aligner ✨ poster has replaced the outback renekton poster 🐊 neat.

  • @Satherian
    @Satherian 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Man, you really have to play Priest in order to even have a chance to deal with these insane boards and buffs

  • @Vallun
    @Vallun 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    I came back to hearthstone recently and thought it was very powercrept since last I remember. Then this expansion dropped. ☠

    • @imaforceanature7297
      @imaforceanature7297 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Descent of dragons was the turning point. Cards from before that set are unrecognizable in comparison.

  • @claytongreenlee7808
    @claytongreenlee7808 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Don’t know why they decided to turn a broken duels treasure into a constructed card with extra upsides that you can tutor from you deck and buff. I called this card being the strongest from the expansion the moment I saw it

    • @danieldaponte1819
      @danieldaponte1819 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which duels treasure?

    • @claytongreenlee7808
      @claytongreenlee7808 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@danieldaponte1819 Grimmer patron, the 3/3 that summons a copy at the end of a turn and if you play it on turn 2 or 3 you usually just win the game or at least snowball tempo early. Even late game the card is good and now its in standard for some reason and has magnetic

    • @danieldaponte1819
      @danieldaponte1819 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@claytongreenlee7808 ahh I forgot about that one. You're right

  • @LucasRodmo
    @LucasRodmo 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The one rule about Dirty Rat: you should have a clear/silence and mana to spend on it. It's the difference between losing and winning too often

  • @EDoyl
    @EDoyl 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    if you stealth your duplicating guy it's like a Sargeras/Lakkari portal that you can infinitely upgrade.

  • @HackionSTx
    @HackionSTx 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Chump REALLY put up a poster of Star Aligner in place of Aussie Sobek huh? Now I respect you good sir.

  • @tristanward4309
    @tristanward4309 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That preist deserved everything that happened to him that game for ripping that rat on 2

  • @HackionSTx
    @HackionSTx 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I commented on Regis reveal video something along the lines "tell me one time where a card with 'this copies itself' was bad in HS".
    I knew this thing would be busted.

  • @LegendMayne
    @LegendMayne 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    HELLO DADDY CHUMP

  • @Ironlionm4n
    @Ironlionm4n 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is just way too powerful

  • @sugurugeto330
    @sugurugeto330 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    A card with such a great effect should be more expensive, or have at least 0/1 stats

    • @victortineo9278
      @victortineo9278 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Specially when it hits the 1/1 divine shield. It just snowballs really easy really early on

  • @Scarth2233
    @Scarth2233 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice poster

  • @hfdbravest11
    @hfdbravest11 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is the first new expansion I've been back for since like, galakronds awakening or Rastahkahn Rumble. And holy shit, just #feelsbadman lol. Probably just a skill issue but damn I was getting bodied at bronze 😞.

  • @aure2549
    @aure2549 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I still don't understand how people could underestimate so much lab constructor. If you really tough 4 mana copy itself at the end of every turn with every possible keyword was weak you are not playing hearthstone

    • @corden826
      @corden826 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I think it would be pretty garbage if it wasn't a mech with magnetize support

  • @huzzlin4979
    @huzzlin4979 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Some how when I play this deck, I face control Priests that has a zillion ways to deal with it...

    • @RenzZlax
      @RenzZlax 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Felt this with my soul

    • @RickyMuzakki
      @RickyMuzakki 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RenzZlaxeveryone and their mother playing control now since they’re mad getting asshanded by mech rogue

  • @mangouschase
    @mangouschase 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Games going turboer than pirate rogue when it was good

    • @manbok2035
      @manbok2035 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Remember Pirate Warrior? Dead by turn 5 or 6?

    • @mangouschase
      @mangouschase 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@manbok2035 Eh, Rogue sometimes is better at the mana cheat thing. Stupid Defias Cannoneer tho

  • @Jinxyoutoheaven
    @Jinxyoutoheaven 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Spark Bots are just killing me by the time turn 4, 5 hits. Never saw rest of deck nor the first card you talk about.

  • @amberlee4536
    @amberlee4536 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mech Rogue this expansion plays like how I expected the Stormwind Quest for Rogue to play, except it didn't do that at all and was kind of awful. I'm actually pleased to see Rogue get a cool, broken utility deck for once, if only because that Quest was so godawful when pretty much every single other one was so busted it got nerfed or is busted in Wild now besides Paladin. That being said, we all know what Paladin Quest does. The last few people I saw play SI:7 Rogue didn't even know themselves what their cards did 😂

  • @brett.c1649
    @brett.c1649 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's all anyone is playing.. being a noob I'm bout rage quit any thoughts on how to counter there nee mechs?

    • @RickyMuzakki
      @RickyMuzakki 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Play control priest or blood dk to counter mechs

    • @brett.c1649
      @brett.c1649 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @RickyMuzakki thx I maid a pretty cool death rattle that's holding its own against most decks I've seen

  • @pingufanal9455
    @pingufanal9455 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Look at the turn 4 board in Game 1.
    And this is not that hard to pull off for that deck. Let's say it would be an easy board on turn 5.
    This should not exist...yeah he draw good and everything but DK is a deck with a strong early and good removal. He can discover blood rune cards to eliminate titans on a regular basis. And even this is too slow and too weak vs rogue.
    DK is a problem in istelf with his easy clear and strong discovers. But put this against a shaman. How will a shaman deal with this turn 5 board (counting coin like in Game 1) without completly fucking his next turn thanks to overload?
    Every class has ways to deal with those boards I know. But the problem is some decks just hit such strong plays way more often then the others have their answers.
    Yes priest has silence. But those are 2 cards in his deck most of the time. Rogue has at least 3 different combos to pull of that kind of board.

    • @ArkansasHS
      @ArkansasHS 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      "But how can X deal with this high roll" is a pretty bad argument against a class that has no board clear. No one was complaining when Rogue just died because your opponent played a single card.

    • @pingufanal9455
      @pingufanal9455 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@ArkansasHS But that is the argument isn't it? It is not a high roll. It is a consistent turn 5. I got no problem dealing 3 dmg to a minion if I know I will deal another 3 next turn and kill it. But if I know it will just become a 7/7 again then it just isn't a matter of having board clear

    • @ArkansasHS
      @ArkansasHS 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pingufanal9455 It's consistent if you draw the exact cards you need, which is what you call a high roll.

    • @pingufanal9455
      @pingufanal9455 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@ArkansasHS Okay so a deck which would have 30 super good cards would only have high rolls? Or would you call it super consistent? Because I would call it consistent. It is not a high roll to me, if you can recreate such turns on a 4/5 game-basis. But doesn't matter how you call it. In my opinion it is way too easy for rogue to kill you on turn 5

    • @ArkansasHS
      @ArkansasHS 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pingufanal9455 Play the deck without Mimiron and Lab Constructor and see how well you do. The deck is bad if you don't high roll. Compare that to Undead Priest which will consistently kill you on turn 5.

  • @user-wv4fe2pc6j
    @user-wv4fe2pc6j 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Guys if u dont have voltron u can olay without him i played like 40 games with this deck and i use him 5-6 times to be fair he very weak titan

  • @ethanarndt6359
    @ethanarndt6359 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2 8/7s on turn 4. That copy at end of turn. Perfectly balanced.
    Need tonremove the copy ability. Then this deck will be balanced. As is 95% of the time the game is over turn 4/5 with a 8+/8+ that copies at end of turn, that can jave stealth/divineshield/windfury/taunt/reborn..... just completely broken....

  • @bird3713
    @bird3713 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is kinda gross to watch - but I swore I'd watch every Chump video

  • @aniersuarez4226
    @aniersuarez4226 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So many cool decks this expac makes me sad to be a free to play player! ;-;

  • @shafta2010
    @shafta2010 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Titans are good weekdays and on the weakend.

  • @cadavison
    @cadavison 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    No fun rogue. No fun for the opponent. I am not a fan.

  • @notabene9630
    @notabene9630 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Ngl this extension feels a bit overpowered with the titans what you guys think ?

    • @chiefkelly
      @chiefkelly 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I dont think the titans themselves are overpowered which is ironic lol so many other busted cards though yes

  • @ElBandito
    @ElBandito 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Yet another powercreep expansion. Good thing I am only watching.

    • @harrygarris6921
      @harrygarris6921 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The power level has risen a lot and yet the best deck is still just the hunter deck from last expansion with like 3 new cards thrown in.

    • @pigeonish_4555
      @pigeonish_4555 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@harrygarris6921 tbf the main reason that deck is good is hollow hound

    • @harrygarris6921
      @harrygarris6921 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@pigeonish_4555 yeah and because hunter can buff hollow hound so easily.

  • @RealityRogue
    @RealityRogue 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’ve gotten boards of +20+20 invent-o-matics with this deck before. Can confirm, this is the funnest deck I’ve played yet

  • @Jay2646
    @Jay2646 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Priest players out here making the dumbest possible plays, as usual

    • @RickyMuzakki
      @RickyMuzakki 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rat on 2, wild players know to not do that. As usual with standardretardation

  • @jingleballs9935
    @jingleballs9935 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    I hate this expansion

    • @Metallijosh100
      @Metallijosh100 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      This might be the most egregious power creep expansion I've seen in all my years of watching HS.

    • @shadowpriest2574
      @shadowpriest2574 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Yeah, I feel you. The most annoying part is the fact that decks nowadays are made to highroll or just hope you roll higher than your opponent. You are not supposed to do any sort of counterplay. Its rly frustrating.

    • @Szgerle
      @Szgerle 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Metallijosh100 Titans each are like, two 10 mana cards merged into one

    • @pokefreakplays
      @pokefreakplays 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I saw so many people pre launch saying how weak the expac was which is hilarious@@Metallijosh100

    • @aure2549
      @aure2549 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@pokefreakplays So many people said with confidence "rogue mech will never work, lab constructor is so weak too slow, 4 mana do nothing" and now they complain about how op it is and ask for nerfs

  • @anilkarakaya9343
    @anilkarakaya9343 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Its impossible to not hit on the most charismatic gamer nerd on earth

    • @PenguinWithInternetAccess
      @PenguinWithInternetAccess 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Nice abs bro

    • @7lucasazevedo
      @7lucasazevedo 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don't be gay trash, man. He has family.

    • @anilkarakaya9343
      @anilkarakaya9343 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PenguinWithInternetAccess appreciate the compliment!

  • @BrownCookieBoy
    @BrownCookieBoy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Of all the expansions of those that didnt deserve legend, mech rogues this expansion are the least deserving. They know it, we know it, everyone knows it.
    When you achieve legend, the deck should be saved in an archive so that they can look back and remember they played with massive handicap.

  • @GenericMedusa99
    @GenericMedusa99 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    some dev out there must really like rogue and hate druid with a passion

  • @christoz77
    @christoz77 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Weakest titan. In my sight, but still good. Mech rogue looks amazing enjoy playing it

    • @kameronjernigan
      @kameronjernigan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      it is weak because ppl are misplaying with it. if u summon like 5-6 mechs in one turn which is easy with rogue then do the 4 dmg one its absolutely nuts or just the anti magic shell just wins games in one button

    • @arachnofiend2859
      @arachnofiend2859 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kameronjernigan Remembering the last Chump video where the Rogue opponent magnetized Lab Constructor onto Voltron, missing the "allied minion" buff and ending up with a bunch of huge minions that couldn't do anything when those could have just been Lab Constructors.

    • @kameronjernigan
      @kameronjernigan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@arachnofiend2859 lmao I didn't see that one hahaha I'ma watch it

  • @Average_CoD_Clips
    @Average_CoD_Clips 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Step 1: Huge stealthy minion
    Step 2: Copy it over and over
    Step 3: ?
    Step 4: Profit
    Tavern Brawl gave me a taste of this deck. Spider stealthing a huge minion into Lab Constructor is OP.
    The deck is pretty cheap but I opened Mimiron, the Mastermind in my free packs so I’m leaning towards it.

  • @fredericbuttler810
    @fredericbuttler810 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was thinking to play mech rogue, but it's so overpowered I will feel bored. Not really much strategy needed...

  • @MrPuch82
    @MrPuch82 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I see a lot of people whining about "power creep" in the comments. Seriously, you guys need to read an explanation what the term means before throwing it around willy nilly.
    It does NOT mean: These new cards are stronger than these old cards.
    Two things need to be true for it to be power creep:
    1. It needs to invalidate cards that are in the same format and lower meta diversity
    2. The old cards that get crowded out need to have been relevant recently
    Both of these are not true about this expansion. At worst it invalidates decks/cards that have left the format years ago and even that is debatable.

    • @aure2549
      @aure2549 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Because they mean the power level is too high, has nothing to do with power creep

    • @kourii
      @kourii 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What you're describing is not power creep either. The _creep_ part isn't just some random word thrown in: 'power creep' describes a longer process whereby the power level of cards ticks up gradually but (generally) inexorably over time. The average statline of minions at various low-end mana costs, for example. What you're describing is a faster-paced and more deleterious process with some additional stipulations you've cooked up

    • @aure2549
      @aure2549 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kourii nope in most TCG power creep simply means that a new card has the exact same purpose as an older but strictly better, so there's no reason at all to play the older card expect if you want an additional weaker copy.
      In hearthstone they try to avoid that by printing the stronger version in a different classe but it still happens sometimes. For exemple there was a neutral 5/4 for 5 taunt tribeless in the classic set then they release a 5/4 for 4 taunt tribeless a few years later.