What happened to the original more powerful TQ ? It never seemed to take off in the market . It may be due to it only being available on one brand . i have the Sachs rs motor 112 nm that has normally only been available on the Nox e bikes . it's a fantastic motor but you rarely hear anything about it , because it's exclusive to one brand .
the TQ sounds like a really great motor .Maybe this one will catch on because it's going after the younger super fit rider that doesn't need or want full power. I haven't heard any negatives about the TQ but that may be due to lack of wide exposure .
Have they updated power level all the Trek places saying it only 50nm not 60nm ??
In fact, this is an error. The motor is 50 Nm, a note has been placed in the description! Thanks.
Nice video. If you don’t mind me asking what height are you and which size were you riding?
im 6" L size.
6'
@@ebikes_org I am also 6ft and feel the bike is very small for a Large. Wish I bought the XL
@@chickenclips interesting, whats your previous bike?
I'm 5"6" (167cm) and the Med even seemed a hair short to me. I'd still go with a Med. I think a large would be too long.
What happened to the original more powerful
TQ ?
It never seemed to take off in the market . It may be due to it only being available on one brand .
i have the Sachs rs motor 112 nm that has normally only been available on the Nox e bikes . it's a fantastic motor but you rarely hear anything about it , because it's exclusive to one brand .
That's a very good question....
the TQ sounds like a really great motor .Maybe this one will catch on because it's going after the younger super fit rider that doesn't need or want full
power.
I haven't heard any negatives about the TQ but that may be due to lack of wide exposure .
300 watts, 50NM
250 w is a nominaL, the 50nm is correct, as we highlighted in the description.