Literally Scientists, Doctors and Post-Doctors who dedicated a lifetime's worth of study into the matter of physics providing knowledge and armchair youtube physicists here in the comment section acting like they know more, get off your high horse people.
@@murraymadness4674 Another good question is what makes a person who builds car trailers think they know better than cosmologists? xD You can't even post a single comment without insulting someone, an 80 IQ move, kiddo.
@@justadam1917 Einstein was talented and scored best in the class, but he skipped tons of lectures and had to use notes from one of his best colleagues Grossmann. Einstein could not bring himself to study things that didn't interest him. Since he was in conflict with some of the University personnel and had a disrespectful approach towards the lectures, nobody wanted to take him as an assistant position to continue the work in the university. He got the job because Grossmann's dad was able to get Einstein job in the patent office. It is a very interesting story, how the scientific career of one of the most influential person in science got halted because of the poor personal relations with the personnel. Despite it, Einstein managed to find time after work to write the 4 ground braking research papers on different topics in under one year! ;)
They're so smart then why don't they know what is causing the accelerated expansion of space or the fast orbital velocity of galaxies or why satellite galaxies and stars along the outskirts of the Milky Way traveling some 1.2 million mi/h have exceeded the escape velocity of the galaxy yet have not been flung out into deep space? If a dark matter halo surrounded the Milky Way the satellite galaxies would have been flung out into deep space a long time ago. A real expert would be able to predict the motion of all the mass in the universe, not just 0.14% of the mass in our solar system.
idk why, but all science related comment sections always have a good portion of aggressively religious types, schizophrenics, and really, very confused questions/arguments about the topic where theyre basically just mashing buzzwords together like a scifi movie. you should see the shit they spin up in PBS spacetimes comments.
I still don't like how the big bang is depicted in graphics like those shown in the beginning of this video. It's no wonder that people ask questions like "what is the universe expanding into" and "where is the centre" when it's depicted this way.
thats not what this graphics show. It is the history, a time scheme of events. Therefore it doesn t show the future (what is the universe expanding into isn t answered here) and it certainly not indicates a place of origin or a map of the universe. Not all these things can be shown in one figure, maybe the supposed future of the universe can be added but it was not the question here.
@@thepuma2012 I think you missed the point of my comment. There's a graphic in the video that plays when they discuss the big bang and makes it appear as though the big bang is an explosion that arises from a singular point, which is an incorrect representation of how we understand the big bang.
Great Video. I'd love to see one that discusses the differences and similarities of Dark Matter and Gravity. For some reason I feel like once we get the answer to one it will reveal the others answers as well.
Theoretically gravity only affects the motion of small objects like planets and moons. Theoretically, dark matter only affects the motion of star, galaxies and light. Because our solar system is made up of about 0.14% of mass smaller than our sun and our sun makes up the remaining 99.8% it indicates because they are unable to explain the motion of our sun that the theory of general relativity and the laws of motion are only 0.14% accurate at describing the motion of mass in our solar system. Not very accurate are they? Imagine if you were a news anchors that were only able to accurately predict 0.14% of the weather every year and then blamed their inaccuracy on dark clouds. Do you think people would still rely on them for their news? I don't rely on any scientist who tries to make me believe in dark matter and dark energy. They are like the guys who can't accurately predict the weather.
In act one, you stated that Dark Matter came after the Big Bang. Since Dark Matter is detected in the CMB (from Act Two), which is only 380,000 years after the Big Bang, how do you know Dark Matter came after the Big Bang?
Hold on! Dr. Bauer says the universe started as a big fireball; Dr. Lincoln (in another Fermilab video) says, no, it did not. He said it was "a great expansion,". Did I misconstrue something?
Cool video, guys. Keep making videos. To understand whether Dark Matter is a good theory or not people need to understand the breadth of evidence that it is trying to explain. This video goes some way toward fleshing that out for people.
No. Dark matter is pinned on the motion of stars far from the center of a galaxy. The motion of the stars near the central supermassive black hole in a galaxy can easily be explained by general relativity and the laws of physics. It is the motion of the stars furthest away from the barycenter of mass in the galaxy that cannot be explained. So they pin this motion on missing mass. Not because they are able to detect dark matter but that's what they believe is causing the extra motion occurring to stars in galaxies. They assume gravity is the only force in the universe able to move stars and galaxies and they are wrong. Mass is not a strong force. Electromagnetism is much stronger than gravity. Even the weak nuclear force is stronger than gravity yet they still believe gravity is the only force causing the motion of mass in the universe. Hence why they blame it on missing mass.
@@stephendatgmail That's what I wanted to know. Does the Dark matter speed up as it clumps together? How does it shed energy as it gets closer together?
@@501Mobius I don’t think that it clumps or gets closer together generally, but I’m probably not the best person to go that deep. I’m sure at the very least there are some constraints on how clumpy it could be.
@@BigNewGames There does seem to be other evidence of DM as there are a small number of galaxies that appear to have had it stripped away and rotate more in accordance with GR.
I think the word night was from the beginning a name for the dark light. They were called Light and Night. The Light made the day come, the Night made the evening come. The Ni-light are probably not rays that is extrovert like the sunlight. It's more of a passive activity or an introvert process, it is the duality to the ray-kinda-light that comes from extrothermical gas planets like the sun. Does the Ni-ght spread itself like a gas? And without that gas the light can not be seen or even exist or travel? In that case, what is keeping the night-"gasmateria" inside of our galaxy? Is our galaxy a disc with a gas sphear around it too? The disc, is that lots of planets or what is that wirlwind kinda form? So many questions. If we succeed to isolate the night and the light and deletes them from a container, what will we find? A rainbow? Heaven? A unicorn? The gods? 😂😂
If my girlfriend is charged with static electricity then it means that I'm attracted to her by gravity, by electromagnetism, by affection and love. That's why it is so strong between us. Case solved! But what about the strong force and the weak force? I'm simply not close enough to her for those to be really involved here. The day they are, we'll become one.
If dark matter can't be seen, how can we "see" it cluster? If you assume that it's there because there's more normal matter there -how do you explain that there was more dark matter there from the beginning? I like the simplicity with which you guys try to explain such complex concepts. Thank you.
To date science is not given a description of the photon, electrons are still a mystery. We can smash together protons to find particles of mass. The large hadron collider can't smash together photons or electrons. We will never find the answer to dark matter without understanding photons.
That would be logical. However, recombination is kinda true also. During "recombination" the electrons would combine with the nuclei and then fly off, combine and fly off, many many times before settling down into a stable state.
Thanks to everyone for a great talk. Concerning the "Big Rip" scenario; wouldn't that create another big bang? I'm thinking that such a 'rip' would finally reach the point of tearing quarks apart, which would just create more quarks. tavi.
A few silly questions, would the Dark Matter fall in the Black holes, (like at center of our Galaxy)? Why didn't the Dark Matter in Galaxy clusters keep condensing and form a Dark Matter Black hole? I assume a Blackhole would be made up of both ordinary and dark matter. Is that assumption too naive?
While some dark matter (a few percent) would fall into the event horizon of a black hole, they are mostly made up of normal matter which consists of particles that collide and slow down and form an accretion disk around the black hole or is funnelled into the area around the black hole. Since dark matter is thought not to interact (only gravitationally) it would not lose kinetic energy and most of it would fly past the black hole.
Dark matter does react with light. It gives it a specific speed limit. Dark matter causes gravity, gravity doesn't manipulate dark matter. Science doesn't understand dark matter because of the Big Bang theory. The reason is the need for normal matter to possess gravity so a lifeless cloud of gas and dust can turn itself into a star which breaks the second law of thermodynamics anyway. It was not gravity that created the energy we see but a massive collision in space in which our universe turned itself into a particle collider with the galaxies being quark plasma shrapnel. Gravity is created as heat manipulates the dark matter field of space that is made of extremely pressurized electron neutrinos. A mass uses heat to create dark matter by destroying electrons and turning them into electron neutrinos. These particles are shot from the mass gravitationally invisible. They push out on the natural pressure of space because they are all the same matter. Gravity is caused by the unenergized electron neutrinos pushing through the outgoing matter and reacting with the normal matter as gravity. These incoming particles are also the cause of the massive charges in clouds as they create new electrons that are unable to ground to the Earth until a lightning bolt hits.
@@jimgraham6722 people don't want change in astrophysics because the same thing has been taught for decades meaning the Lambda-CDM model. Edwin Hubble, the mastermind of the expanding galaxies, never believed in the expanding universe theory. He, and many others, thought that it was too religious an assumption. What I am suggesting is a paradigm shift that nobody wants to have anything to do with. It is the exact same scrutiny that Galileo faced as he told the world the Earth was not the center of the universe. Now, people are mad at me because I tell them that the universe wasn't "born" 13.8 billion years ago. Somehow it has become absurd to disagree with it yet the same people that argue for it to their death strategically ignore every neverending question that the theory has been unable to solve. It's nothing but crickets.
This a question not an opinion. If dark matter and dark energy is over 95% of the universe why is it not here on earth where it can be study more easily?.
I understand that dark matter interacts with gravity the same way as normal matter. If that is the case, why would it not cluster in exactly the same way as normal matter? For example, why is there no dark matter in the Sun? And if dark matter doesn't interact with any of the other forces, then there is also no force that keeps the dark matter particles apart. If that is the case, why don't they cluster together into black holes?
Dark matter is thought to have a very tiny cross section, so it can't really collide with other dark matter and fall to the center of a gravity well. It may also annihilate with itself.
@@spartanatreyu _"so it can't really collide with other dark matter and fall to the center of a gravity well"_ - as long as it is attracted to other matter and other dark matter, it should not make a difference how large its cross section is. It should still fall to the center of the gravity well. Especially if it does not interact with other matter, that is, when it can go through normal atoms.
@@renedekker9806 Cross section absolutely matters. Without collision, things can't settle. If you imagine a dark matter particle from outside the Solar System was on a "collision course" with the Sun it would drift into the system, accelerate as it gets closer to the Sun, pass right through the centre, come out the other side decelerating but with enough velocity to continue to head out of the Solar System never to be encountered again. Even if we imagine a dark matter particle inside the Solar System without enough velocity to escape, it will either orbit the sun, or pass through the sun over and over again like a frictionless pendulum. It will never settle inside the centre of the Sun.
@@spartanatreyu _"If you imagine a dark matter particle from outside the Solar System was on a "collision course" with the Sun"_ - the vast majority of Dark Matter is supposed to be around from the Big Bang, and, according to the video, was cold. So the image you need to think about is dark matter floating around in a cloud together with normal matter, and then collapsing inward due to gravity, creating the Sun. Not particles from outside after the Sun was already formed. _"it will either orbit the sun, or pass through the sun over and over again like a frictionless pendulum."_ - It will orbit the Sun inside the Sun.
@@renedekker9806 *"and then collapsing inward due to gravity, creating the Sun"* Yes, dark matter particles would collapse towards the center of the Sun, and because the particles don't collide, they would shoot outside the sun on the other side. The reason regular matter doesn't shoot through the other side is because the effect of the particle's electromagnetic and strong nuclear forces have a large and strong enough cross sectional area of effect, that they can collide, turning their velocity into another form of energy (usually heat). Dark matter is not effected by either the electromagnetic or strong nuclear force, so it does not collide (interact) in any real sense with particles that are effected by those forces. For a dark matter particle to orbit within a star, it needs to be both: within a star and have such a small relative velocity to that star that it is below that star's escape velocity. *Edit*: If you're under the assumption that a dark matter particle would orbit a star even without collision, you'll want to check out collisionless n-body simulatons with a particle on a hyperbolic trajectory.
Sending our brightest scientists to shed some light on something invisible might seem like going up a blind alley, but it might be crazy enough to provide a crystal clear explanation on how our universe really works!
Ahh, that's cute, for some reason... I've never seen a slide in a fairly technical, yet nonetheless layman's level physics presentation that says "Really energetic beam" or "Really intense beam" ! That's Really Neat !!!
A lot of research seeking something for which not a single example has been detected. Effects that can be conveniently explained by the presence dark matter, but dark matter itself remains elusive.
@@louislesch3878 dark gravity that is concentrated around galaxies. gravity itself has no way to concentrate itself without matter. so dark matter is a pretty good name, even if it could be wrong
Fireball? Does not change a light trajectory? This is what I heard in 2 mins after a beginning. May be electrons rotate around a core? PS Some kind of excited state of a vector form of Higgs field? So a Higgs boson must be a result of an annihilation with a certain spectrum of a decay.
Thank you. Thank you. Great video. My life on earth is constantly looking up at the sky. I do not believe we are alone (as I hum “Is anybody out there?”-Pink Floyd).
it's OK . . . calm down . . . the aliens told me that the dark energy isn't pushing the universe apart . . . it's just heating up the dark matter causing it to expand . . . so there!!!!!
Do you know how much energy is required to accelerate a single particle in a particle accelerator up to the speed of light? An infinite amount of energy. So how much energy is required to accelerate galaxies up to the speed of light? An infinite amount of energy, more than the universe contains inside all the mass in the universe. That's just one galaxy. But in every direction they look all galaxies are moving away from us faster than the speed of light. So how much energy does it take to accelerate all the galaxies around us faster than the speed of light? It is beyond comprehension. Dark energy and dark matter are mistakes in their equations because their equations are wrong. They are missing variables and scientists have no idea what's missing so they blame all the motion on either dark matter of dark energy. They think they are so smart yet failed to predict the motion of our solar system as it orbits the center of the galaxy? Out of all the mass in out solar system they are only able to predict the motion of 0.14%. Scientific theories and laws come up short trying to explain the motion of mass. So, scientists invented dark matter and dark energy as wildcards to explain the motion they cannot account for. These variables can take on any value to make scientists look like they know what they're talking about when they have no clue. In reality dark matter and dark energy are pseudoscience. There is not dark matter or dark energy. There is simply a misunderstanding as to what causes large, old mass to move through space.
@@BigNewGames The galaxies were not accelerated beyond the speed of light, in fact the average speed of a galaxy is in the hundreds to thousands of km/s which is less than 1% of the speed of light. Space itself is expanding.
@@tonywells6990 Yes, the expansion of space is a slow acceleration between galaxies that I deduced many years ago. Have you figured out what is causing it yet? I did. I even got a single value, a single variable that explains both dark matter and dark energy.
Spatial (by Doppler effect) explanation of Hubble's redshift led to Bing Bang singularity. Actually, this redshift is neither space nor light related: Let's say, 10 billion years ago you started sending letters to yourself, one letter a day. 10 billion years have passed, and now, for some reason, the day is twice shorter than it used to be, and letters start coming. How many letters you'll be receiving a day? = 1 letter every other day. And if 14B years ago time was twice slower than today, then of 100 light-waves sent a second, you'll be receiving 50 waves a second now. Frequency drop = wavelength increase = redshift. Cosmology collapsed on twice slower time 14B years ago, because wavelength (which depends on a Second, even in our eyes) change was incorrectly explained via space/wave expansion. It is first chapter of my Time Matters. Second chapter of Time Matters debunks Dark Matter.
so in a way I am up aginst The City Of Toronto developers and the land use, my land says they are wrong! The Church on Duffrin Street and Davenport was wrong to raise the land and hide the true beauty of my beloved city
Cart before the horse syndrome. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon has laid all this to rest 19 years ago : wakey wakey.
I am very curious about dark ( matter and energy ). My thoughts over the years has sent me in a direction where, I feel they may be the area(s) of dimensional shifting. More investigating is definitely required.
Optical telescopes are prone to distortion no matter how large. As a matter of reference the larger a optical telescope is the more prone it is to structural intolerance. You can create a program to digitally enhance the images from the optical telescope. The light is still distorted by the gravity of any object between the source of light and the primary mirror of the telescope. The week Force of gravity on light only by our own Moon will transform any image made with an EarthBound telescope. Thank you peace
All I need to believe dark matter exists. is an explanation of why every example of a structure which is mostly dark matter is extremely dense, and every example of a structure with almost no dark matter is extremely diffuse. this includes the mapping of the dark matter in the bullet cluster. I dont have a degree so ELI5.
nothing is less then zero 5 - 10 = 5 ^-5 {1+1} 2; 1,1,+; 11; 2 integers & 1 calculator; a math problem; a point of interest; ect Dark matter appears to hold ties to being the anti range respects of the density gravity polarity(no space under 0 so not solid to gas //p! its introverted solid to extraverted gas to introverted gas to extraverted solid) __& not simply a 'too far away persuasion for anything more then quadrant gravity slopes via reflection & dampening' the universe acts like a dampening field each new stack thicker gets less kinetic but in our Quadrant 001s Terran Systems Yellow Stars physics (&++>**surrounding hood) hot > cauterize > grease > widen > 0 < thin < slide < harden < cold so is dark matter the left over Gravitron dots(spread across the blackhole plain)? allowing them to get absorbed as the next reaction takes hold? #noblepeaceprice
u think na no way, are they after the ARORA well just look on Rogers Road right behind Rex building supplies homes thirty feet of grade seems that way? seems they are out to block the sunset aswell and the moon yes, as I did make the mistake of complainig the house was going higher on the hill well seems new rules in town now, my elevation here was an inverted valley now its nolonger it? and if thats the case and this home and theres were all planned to take water? what did they destroy? hard questions even here on earth that need clarification, not only dark matter? this is about what derection our world is taking as I see it?
Looking forward to see a Modified Gravity day, where 30 seconds are dedicated to Dark Matter, simply stating that we know it doesn't work, without further explanations... And it would have been interesting to include in this vídeo all the DM detections that ocurred in the last decades, with all the colliders, detectors,... And funds keep coming in...
Thanks for the video. Could dark matter have something to do with space? Maybe dark matter and dark energy are inherent properties of space. We always assume that infinite space always existed and that the universe is expanding into this unlimited free space. Isn't there a better explanation to define space and how is it expanding and expanding into what?
I believe there is a political bias in the choice of your science talkers so I skipped all women and non-whites. I am perfeclty fine with bias based on entertainment, like Neil Degrasse is entertaining. The fact that top research centers get on board with the political bias is polarising everybody, forcing empathy onto people is not gonna work. It's getting unethical.
I don't believe in dark matter, but I don't have to work for some university. I designed electronics. Electronic systems never work as expected when there is test data, but every designer thinks his ideas will work.
dark matter isnt a physical, singular sort of object you "believe" in. Its the name of a problem with our understanding of the relationship between gravity and mass. We KNOW something is wrong, and until someone comes along flips relativity on its head and says "THIS is how gravity really works", we just have to assume we're missing a massive particle.
@@Hal_McKinney Because of their extremely low rest mass. For years, physicists wondered whether they were actually massless, but they were eventually measured to roughly one ten billionth the mass of a proton. No theory has shown how such a lightweight particle could account for 4/5 of the universe's matter.
@@CAPSLOCKPUNDIT like you said, neutrinos are not massless, so given enough time, with bazillions streaming out of every star in the universe every bazillo-second, eventually there’s enough mass.
@@Hal_McKinney you are missing to comprehend the amount of dark matter. the magnitude of dark matter we see affecting gravity is way less than the gazellion neutrinos emitted from stars. The dark matter is estimated to be 4/5 portion of total matter.
Dark matter must be invoked to explain why far away galaxies don't spin according to current gravity equations from their observable light. A much simpler answer will emerge in the future. This contorted view reminds how people explained how everything revolved around the earth before we understand more.
It has to explain far more than that. How do you expect to progress in the area if you want them to stop trying to explain it now and wait for a "simpler answer in the future". Before Copernicus scientific method was not in use, and cosmology was more like a philosophy. Most of the particles in the standard model have been discovered in the second half of the last century.
But, we know it's not a perfect solution, and we know that either our model of gravity is wrong, or there must be something that behave like matter according to it. The thing is, people have tried to come up with models that recapitulate the dark matter related issues, but it always end up not fitting other observations. So at this moment, dark matter actually being a form of matter is the main theory, with everybody ready to welcome any solid alternative if and whenever it presents itself.
@@arnaudnicolas2782 The issue is this video is coming across as facts, not theory. It is a rather wild idea with essentially no real data to support it, except that our current gravity theory fails. How about you fix the gravity theory? There seems to me a lot of other possibilities other than invoking some magic material.
@@murraymadness4674 dark matter is a solution that fits the data because it's a solution built by looking at the shape of the hole on the data and designing a piece that fits in it. It's deductive reasoning. The reason it's called matter is that once you look at that supposed piece, it has all the properties of conventional matter, except that it doesn't interact with light in a way we can detect. The reason it's talked about as seriously as if it was 100% real is that 1)it fits the data so insanely well it's uncanny and 2) despite throwing all the brilliant minds we can at it, nobody so far has comes close to fitting the data the way the dark matter model does. But again physicists the world over will welcome any alternative model of the universe that account for the observation without using dark matter. But until then, the dark matter model fits so well, they'll keep using it to make predictions about the universe.
The best way to detect DM is with layers of electrons as DM are dead particle waves (only a 4d spin w/cross-dimensional wave) but occasionally reconstitutes (this is why less light is observed in space.} Observing the electrons for wave change will give you hints to DM interaction as they reconstitute local dimensional adhesions.
Because all our observations indicate it acts just like matter in the sense that it bends space time like matter does. IOW it causes gravitational effects just as matter particles do. It seems to have mass and therefore also momentum.
Not extra gravity. Extra propulsion. The extra motion that theory and law cannot explain only happens to stars and galaxies. So stars and galaxies must somehow propel themselves, a slow acceleration over time.
If it was a slow acceleration then it would be the same for stars and galaxies because it would be based on time. The solar system is 5 billion years old. It is traveling 500,000 mi/h. That's an acceleration of 1 mi/h every 10,000 years. The Milky Way galaxy contains much more mass than our solar system so their mass is not a common factor to their motion right? The Milky Way galaxy is 13.7 billion years old. It is traveling 1.37 million mi/h. That's an acceleration of 1 mi/h ever 10,000 years. Their mass is not the same but their acceleration rates are the same even though they don't contain the same mass. Mass is not the common factor in their motion! Time is the common factor in their motion.
Talking about a "particle" that hasn't been verified. Keep in mind, *there is* real matter that can't be seen *within* the expanse of space. We shouldn't expect to see all the (real) matter in the universe. We can only see matter where there is fusion. Light also travels faster where there is less matter since time goes by faster in a greater measure of distance.
It's like old info as things found older then 15 billion years old, and dark mater should be called air as it's smaller then a grain of sand and has quantum levels of black holes.
Space is a photoshopped lie of the serpent...we are in an enclosed earth, see Genesis...The little g god of this world, for now, satan, is a liar, and the father of lies...run to the ONLY One Who can save you, JESUS, the only begotten SON of God, don't put your faith and trust in man, who cannot save you, call upon the NAME of the LORD JESUS. Romans 10:9-10 9That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. 10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation....
If one moonless night you hear a duck, see duck feathers, and notice duck prints but you can't see a duck around, it is reasonable to assume there is a duck but it's too dim to see. So until you figure out an explanation that doesn't involve a duck, you give it a cool name and look for it.
@@nihlify it all depends on how you look at what i said. We have no idea weather space is always the same or changing its properties over time. It is quite striking that there are Galaxies without any extra gravitational pull other than the gravitational pull from the observable matter. Also these galaxies are young, galaxies without a spiral structure. so taking that into consideration dark matter could be an illusion created by space that has been compressed and decompressed multiple times whic made its integrity more loose.
Cold fusion happens when you suspend hydrogen particles or protons in a vacuum using a weak magnetic field. When long wavelength light (visible) goes into the suspended protons they come out the other side as high energy radiation (X-rays, gamma rays) and heat. Use cold light having a long wavelength to make high energy light and heat.
@@BigNewGames cold fusion with palladium and deuterium , in beaker put heavy water and lithium salt and palladium as anode and lead as cathode if current pass ., palladium has cubic structure so palladium absorb more deuterium ,there palladium contracting because of current passing and deuterium+deuterium= helium +gamma ray
i love how uncanny this is. we can hear his taps on the keyboard as he proceeds the slides
I thought he was bouncing a ball. Just shooting the breeze.
"SLAMS" Hos keyboard
plot twist.
he's writing the presentation in real time.
Literally Scientists, Doctors and Post-Doctors who dedicated a lifetime's worth of study into the matter of physics providing knowledge and armchair youtube physicists here in the comment section acting like they know more, get off your high horse people.
@@murraymadness4674 There's nothing wrong with asking questions. But a reasonable starting point is "What do the scientists know that I don't?"
@@murraymadness4674 Another good question is what makes a person who builds car trailers think they know better than cosmologists? xD You can't even post a single comment without insulting someone, an 80 IQ move, kiddo.
Albert Einstein was a clerk in a pattern office when he did his most valuable thinking
@@justadam1917 Einstein was talented and scored best in the class, but he skipped tons of lectures and had to use notes from one of his best colleagues Grossmann. Einstein could not bring himself to study things that didn't interest him. Since he was in conflict with some of the University personnel and had a disrespectful approach towards the lectures, nobody wanted to take him as an assistant position to continue the work in the university. He got the job because Grossmann's dad was able to get Einstein job in the patent office. It is a very interesting story, how the scientific career of one of the most influential person in science got halted because of the poor personal relations with the personnel. Despite it, Einstein managed to find time after work to write the 4 ground braking research papers on different topics in under one year! ;)
They're so smart then why don't they know what is causing the accelerated expansion of space or the fast orbital velocity of galaxies or why satellite galaxies and stars along the outskirts of the Milky Way traveling some 1.2 million mi/h have exceeded the escape velocity of the galaxy yet have not been flung out into deep space? If a dark matter halo surrounded the Milky Way the satellite galaxies would have been flung out into deep space a long time ago. A real expert would be able to predict the motion of all the mass in the universe, not just 0.14% of the mass in our solar system.
lol all the, Dunning/Krugers, in the comment section.
idk why, but all science related comment sections always have a good portion of aggressively religious types, schizophrenics, and really, very confused questions/arguments about the topic where theyre basically just mashing buzzwords together like a scifi movie.
you should see the shit they spin up in PBS spacetimes comments.
@@eattoast6378 the psychos are psycho for science
video starts at 0:00 . Welcome
thanks!
Thanks to all of you who worked on putting this together. Great job. Those of us with IQ's under 125 appreciate it.
IQ's are just an illusion
Beautiful easy to grasp presentation. Those keyboard taps added a nice flavour to it :)
Thank you Mr. Dan Bauer
I still don't like how the big bang is depicted in graphics like those shown in the beginning of this video. It's no wonder that people ask questions like "what is the universe expanding into" and "where is the centre" when it's depicted this way.
thats not what this graphics show. It is the history, a time scheme of events. Therefore it doesn t show the future (what is the universe expanding into isn t answered here) and it certainly not indicates a place of origin or a map of the universe. Not all these things can be shown in one figure, maybe the supposed future of the universe can be added but it was not the question here.
@@thepuma2012 I think you missed the point of my comment. There's a graphic in the video that plays when they discuss the big bang and makes it appear as though the big bang is an explosion that arises from a singular point, which is an incorrect representation of how we understand the big bang.
@@Candesce no, i couldn t make that up from your comment indeed
Great Video. I'd love to see one that discusses the differences and similarities of Dark Matter and Gravity. For some reason I feel like once we get the answer to one it will reveal the others answers as well.
@@guff9567 Were you talking to me? Who are you calling Loser?
My friend and me were discussing about the same thing a few days ago
Theoretically gravity only affects the motion of small objects like planets and moons. Theoretically, dark matter only affects the motion of star, galaxies and light. Because our solar system is made up of about 0.14% of mass smaller than our sun and our sun makes up the remaining 99.8% it indicates because they are unable to explain the motion of our sun that the theory of general relativity and the laws of motion are only 0.14% accurate at describing the motion of mass in our solar system. Not very accurate are they?
Imagine if you were a news anchors that were only able to accurately predict 0.14% of the weather every year and then blamed their inaccuracy on dark clouds. Do you think people would still rely on them for their news? I don't rely on any scientist who tries to make me believe in dark matter and dark energy. They are like the guys who can't accurately predict the weather.
@@BigNewGames why are you contradicting your first and last statements tho xD
@@Shreysoldier I didn't. You simply misunderstood what I said.
Is it possible that dark and ordinary matter are constantly converted back and forth like in a chemical equation and dark energy is the catalyst?
I FEEL PROUD TO SEE INDIAN SCIENTIST IN FERMI LAB #LOVEFROMINDIA
There's a big bang every few seconds in this video.
Can we sithesize neutron? can it be done in big amounts? how energy intense it woud be?
In act one, you stated that Dark Matter came after the Big Bang. Since Dark Matter is detected in the CMB (from Act Two), which is only 380,000 years after the Big Bang, how do you know Dark Matter came after the Big Bang?
Hold on! Dr. Bauer says the universe started as a big fireball; Dr. Lincoln (in another Fermilab video) says, no, it did not. He said it was "a great expansion,". Did I misconstrue something?
Cool video, guys. Keep making videos. To understand whether Dark Matter is a good theory or not people need to understand the breadth of evidence that it is trying to explain. This video goes some way toward fleshing that out for people.
Does dark matter rotate around the center of the galaxy or does it not play any part in the rotational motion of the galaxy?
Orbits and contributes to the center of mass in the same manner as normal matter.
No. Dark matter is pinned on the motion of stars far from the center of a galaxy. The motion of the stars near the central supermassive black hole in a galaxy can easily be explained by general relativity and the laws of physics. It is the motion of the stars furthest away from the barycenter of mass in the galaxy that cannot be explained. So they pin this motion on missing mass. Not because they are able to detect dark matter but that's what they believe is causing the extra motion occurring to stars in galaxies. They assume gravity is the only force in the universe able to move stars and galaxies and they are wrong. Mass is not a strong force. Electromagnetism is much stronger than gravity. Even the weak nuclear force is stronger than gravity yet they still believe gravity is the only force causing the motion of mass in the universe. Hence why they blame it on missing mass.
@@stephendatgmail That's what I wanted to know. Does the Dark matter speed up as it clumps together? How does it shed energy as it gets closer together?
@@501Mobius I don’t think that it clumps or gets closer together generally, but I’m probably not the best person to go that deep. I’m sure at the very least there are some constraints on how clumpy it could be.
@@BigNewGames There does seem to be other evidence of DM as there are a small number of galaxies that appear to have had it stripped away and rotate more in accordance with GR.
Hi Chris.. Very Cool!! the Shadows betray everything.. I think a complete city/Basis.. Thanks really Nice find 👌👍✌
When talking about température, please use the number of degrees Kelvin. Don't divide température by 100..
The tapping sound is very annoying
Fabulous, thanks all. Very interesting!
I think the word night was from the beginning a name for the dark light. They were called Light and Night. The Light made the day come, the Night made the evening come.
The Ni-light are probably not rays that is extrovert like the sunlight. It's more of a passive activity or an introvert process, it is the duality to the ray-kinda-light that comes from extrothermical gas planets like the sun. Does the Ni-ght spread itself like a gas? And without that gas the light can not be seen or even exist or travel?
In that case, what is keeping the night-"gasmateria" inside of our galaxy? Is our galaxy a disc with a gas sphear around it too? The disc, is that lots of planets or what is that wirlwind kinda form?
So many questions.
If we succeed to isolate the night and the light and deletes them from a container, what will we find? A rainbow? Heaven? A unicorn? The gods?
😂😂
Thank you so much for your work! ^.^
Got a strong key tapping finger.
If my girlfriend is charged with static electricity then it means that I'm attracted to her by gravity, by electromagnetism, by affection and love. That's why it is so strong between us. Case solved! But what about the strong force and the weak force? I'm simply not close enough to her for those to be really involved here. The day they are, we'll become one.
If dark matter can't be seen, how can we "see" it cluster?
If you assume that it's there because there's more normal matter there -how do you explain that there was more dark matter there from the beginning?
I like the simplicity with which you guys try to explain such complex concepts.
Thank you.
one way is gravitational lensing
All of this primordial universe discussion should be called into question based on JWT evidence…
To date science is not given a description of the photon, electrons are still a mystery. We can smash together protons to find particles of mass. The large hadron collider can't smash together photons or electrons. We will never find the answer to dark matter without understanding photons.
Spider-man: Turn Off the Dark Matter
Great, thank you.
*A video about something preposterous (dark matter) in 40 minutes? No, thank you!*
I found the video interesting and sent it to my grandkids to see.
Gteat work
Shoulda got Don to read that script. Maybe then I wouldn’t have needed closed captions.
Whoa. ! Things get abrupt around 40:30.
4:29 should this be combine rather than recombine. Isn't this the first time that the particles remain in a combined state?
Yes! Even people in the field joke about that. But the official term is recombination.
It would be the first time, so combine - i would say
That would be logical. However, recombination is kinda true also.
During "recombination" the electrons would combine with the nuclei and then fly off, combine and fly off, many many times before settling down into a stable state.
@@nmarbletoe8210 good point, but essentially the start of the combination process
Some theories says that our Universe is expanding just because of Dark Energies.
Thanks to everyone for a great talk. Concerning the "Big Rip" scenario; wouldn't that create another big bang? I'm thinking that such a 'rip' would finally reach the point of tearing quarks apart, which would just create more quarks. tavi.
A few silly questions, would the Dark Matter fall in the Black holes, (like at center of our Galaxy)? Why didn't the Dark Matter in Galaxy clusters keep condensing and form a Dark Matter Black hole? I assume a Blackhole would be made up of both ordinary and dark matter. Is that assumption too naive?
While some dark matter (a few percent) would fall into the event horizon of a black hole, they are mostly made up of normal matter which consists of particles that collide and slow down and form an accretion disk around the black hole or is funnelled into the area around the black hole. Since dark matter is thought not to interact (only gravitationally) it would not lose kinetic energy and most of it would fly past the black hole.
@@tonywells6990 Thanks Tony.
Thanks for this series of explanations and showing the direction of research in the future. I had no idea of this perspective.
Dark matter does react with light. It gives it a specific speed limit.
Dark matter causes gravity, gravity doesn't manipulate dark matter.
Science doesn't understand dark matter because of the Big Bang theory. The reason is the need for normal matter to possess gravity so a lifeless cloud of gas and dust can turn itself into a star which breaks the second law of thermodynamics anyway. It was not gravity that created the energy we see but a massive collision in space in which our universe turned itself into a particle collider with the galaxies being quark plasma shrapnel. Gravity is created as heat manipulates the dark matter field of space that is made of extremely pressurized electron neutrinos. A mass uses heat to create dark matter by destroying electrons and turning them into electron neutrinos. These particles are shot from the mass gravitationally invisible. They push out on the natural pressure of space because they are all the same matter. Gravity is caused by the unenergized electron neutrinos pushing through the outgoing matter and reacting with the normal matter as gravity. These incoming particles are also the cause of the massive charges in clouds as they create new electrons that are unable to ground to the Earth until a lightning bolt hits.
Interesting idea, maybe.
@@jimgraham6722 people don't want change in astrophysics because the same thing has been taught for decades meaning the Lambda-CDM model. Edwin Hubble, the mastermind of the expanding galaxies, never believed in the expanding universe theory. He, and many others, thought that it was too religious an assumption. What I am suggesting is a paradigm shift that nobody wants to have anything to do with. It is the exact same scrutiny that Galileo faced as he told the world the Earth was not the center of the universe. Now, people are mad at me because I tell them that the universe wasn't "born" 13.8 billion years ago. Somehow it has become absurd to disagree with it yet the same people that argue for it to their death strategically ignore every neverending question that the theory has been unable to solve. It's nothing but crickets.
This a question not an opinion. If dark matter and dark energy is over 95% of the universe why is it not here on earth where it can be study more easily?.
It is here! But it doesn't mean it's easy to study
Wouldn't dark gravity be a better name?
I understand that dark matter interacts with gravity the same way as normal matter. If that is the case, why would it not cluster in exactly the same way as normal matter? For example, why is there no dark matter in the Sun?
And if dark matter doesn't interact with any of the other forces, then there is also no force that keeps the dark matter particles apart. If that is the case, why don't they cluster together into black holes?
Dark matter is thought to have a very tiny cross section, so it can't really collide with other dark matter and fall to the center of a gravity well.
It may also annihilate with itself.
@@spartanatreyu _"so it can't really collide with other dark matter and fall to the center of a gravity well"_ - as long as it is attracted to other matter and other dark matter, it should not make a difference how large its cross section is. It should still fall to the center of the gravity well. Especially if it does not interact with other matter, that is, when it can go through normal atoms.
@@renedekker9806 Cross section absolutely matters. Without collision, things can't settle.
If you imagine a dark matter particle from outside the Solar System was on a "collision course" with the Sun it would drift into the system, accelerate as it gets closer to the Sun, pass right through the centre, come out the other side decelerating but with enough velocity to continue to head out of the Solar System never to be encountered again.
Even if we imagine a dark matter particle inside the Solar System without enough velocity to escape, it will either orbit the sun, or pass through the sun over and over again like a frictionless pendulum. It will never settle inside the centre of the Sun.
@@spartanatreyu _"If you imagine a dark matter particle from outside the Solar System was on a "collision course" with the Sun"_ - the vast majority of Dark Matter is supposed to be around from the Big Bang, and, according to the video, was cold. So the image you need to think about is dark matter floating around in a cloud together with normal matter, and then collapsing inward due to gravity, creating the Sun. Not particles from outside after the Sun was already formed.
_"it will either orbit the sun, or pass through the sun over and over again like a frictionless pendulum."_ - It will orbit the Sun inside the Sun.
@@renedekker9806 *"and then collapsing inward due to gravity, creating the Sun"*
Yes, dark matter particles would collapse towards the center of the Sun, and because the particles don't collide, they would shoot outside the sun on the other side.
The reason regular matter doesn't shoot through the other side is because the effect of the particle's electromagnetic and strong nuclear forces have a large and strong enough cross sectional area of effect, that they can collide, turning their velocity into another form of energy (usually heat).
Dark matter is not effected by either the electromagnetic or strong nuclear force, so it does not collide (interact) in any real sense with particles that are effected by those forces.
For a dark matter particle to orbit within a star, it needs to be both: within a star and have such a small relative velocity to that star that it is below that star's escape velocity.
*Edit*: If you're under the assumption that a dark matter particle would orbit a star even without collision, you'll want to check out collisionless n-body simulatons with a particle on a hyperbolic trajectory.
Sending our brightest scientists to shed some light on something invisible might seem like going up a blind alley, but it might be crazy enough to provide a crystal clear explanation on how our universe really works!
👍🏼👍🏼
Send a space craft beyond the ort cloud? Any telescope will have bended light or radio frequencies if it is within our Solar sphere.
Ahh, that's cute, for some reason...
I've never seen a slide in a fairly technical, yet nonetheless layman's level physics presentation that says "Really energetic beam" or "Really intense beam" !
That's Really Neat !!!
A lot of research seeking something for which not a single example has been detected. Effects that can be conveniently explained by the presence dark matter, but dark matter itself remains elusive.
I think Neil deGrasse Tyson said it best in that the term "matter" isn't even accurate. It's really dark gravity.
@@louislesch3878 dark gravity that is concentrated around galaxies. gravity itself has no way to concentrate itself without matter. so dark matter is a pretty good name, even if it could be wrong
That button is loud.
Fireball? Does not change a light trajectory? This is what I heard in 2 mins after a beginning. May be electrons rotate around a core?
PS Some kind of excited state of a vector form of Higgs field? So a Higgs boson must be a result of an annihilation with a certain spectrum of a decay.
Love You guys👊😈
Thank you. Thank you. Great video. My life on earth is constantly looking up at the sky. I do not believe we are alone (as I hum “Is anybody out there?”-Pink Floyd).
it's OK . . . calm down . . . the aliens told me that the dark energy isn't pushing the universe apart . . . it's just heating up the dark matter causing it to expand . . . so there!!!!!
Do you know how much energy is required to accelerate a single particle in a particle accelerator up to the speed of light? An infinite amount of energy. So how much energy is required to accelerate galaxies up to the speed of light? An infinite amount of energy, more than the universe contains inside all the mass in the universe. That's just one galaxy. But in every direction they look all galaxies are moving away from us faster than the speed of light. So how much energy does it take to accelerate all the galaxies around us faster than the speed of light? It is beyond comprehension. Dark energy and dark matter are mistakes in their equations because their equations are wrong. They are missing variables and scientists have no idea what's missing so they blame all the motion on either dark matter of dark energy. They think they are so smart yet failed to predict the motion of our solar system as it orbits the center of the galaxy? Out of all the mass in out solar system they are only able to predict the motion of 0.14%. Scientific theories and laws come up short trying to explain the motion of mass. So, scientists invented dark matter and dark energy as wildcards to explain the motion they cannot account for. These variables can take on any value to make scientists look like they know what they're talking about when they have no clue. In reality dark matter and dark energy are pseudoscience. There is not dark matter or dark energy. There is simply a misunderstanding as to what causes large, old mass to move through space.
@@BigNewGames The galaxies were not accelerated beyond the speed of light, in fact the average speed of a galaxy is in the hundreds to thousands of km/s which is less than 1% of the speed of light. Space itself is expanding.
@@tonywells6990 Yes, the expansion of space is a slow acceleration between galaxies that I deduced many years ago. Have you figured out what is causing it yet? I did. I even got a single value, a single variable that explains both dark matter and dark energy.
@@BigNewGames You are completely wrong. Anyone can make up facts but you have to at least show your working out.
@@BigNewGames ah, one of those. humour me, what is this great thing you thought of and if its so great why was it not published?
I never thought I would live long enough to see a pandemic rage, I thought I would never see such distruction of peioples habatat!
Dark matter is a neutral vacuum.
Spatial (by Doppler effect) explanation of Hubble's redshift led to Bing Bang singularity.
Actually, this redshift is neither space nor light related:
Let's say, 10 billion years ago you started sending letters to yourself, one letter a day.
10 billion years have passed, and now, for some reason, the day is twice shorter than it used to be, and letters start coming.
How many letters you'll be receiving a day? = 1 letter every other day.
And if 14B years ago time was twice slower than today, then of 100 light-waves sent a second, you'll be receiving 50 waves a second now.
Frequency drop = wavelength increase = redshift. Cosmology collapsed on twice slower time 14B years ago, because wavelength (which depends on a Second, even in our eyes) change was incorrectly explained via space/wave expansion.
It is first chapter of my Time Matters. Second chapter of Time Matters debunks Dark Matter.
mP=(hxE)I(G*xM*)
is it necessary to explain the big bang as a fireball? it's pretty misleading
Ball is bound, BB not so.
yeah, it was fiery but it wasn't a ball... but it could have been a hyperball
@@nmarbletoe8210 not really fire. there was no oxidation. fire had not formed
so in a way I am up aginst The City Of Toronto developers and the land use, my land says they are wrong! The Church on Duffrin Street and Davenport was wrong to raise the land and hide the true beauty of my beloved city
Cart before the horse syndrome. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon has laid all this to rest 19 years ago : wakey wakey.
I am very curious about dark ( matter and energy ). My thoughts over the years has sent me in a direction where, I feel they may be the area(s) of dimensional shifting. More investigating is definitely required.
Checkout Issac Arthur's vids on it!
Optical telescopes are prone to distortion no matter how large. As a matter of reference the larger a optical telescope is the more prone it is to structural intolerance. You can create a program to digitally enhance the images from the optical telescope. The light is still distorted by the gravity of any object between the source of light and the primary mirror of the telescope. The week Force of gravity on light only by our own Moon will transform any image made with an EarthBound telescope. Thank you peace
All I need to believe dark matter exists. is an explanation of why every example of a structure which is mostly dark matter is extremely dense, and every example of a structure with almost no dark matter is extremely diffuse.
this includes the mapping of the dark matter in the bullet cluster.
I dont have a degree so ELI5.
Starfleet Naval Group [NCC]
Starfleet Repair Dock
General Analyst Comnd
Psychological Sciences Division insignia:
dark matter is such a hard topic
nothing is less then zero
5 - 10 = 5 ^-5
{1+1}
2; 1,1,+; 11; 2 integers & 1 calculator; a math problem; a point of interest; ect
Dark matter appears to hold ties to being the anti range respects of the density gravity polarity(no space under 0
so not solid to gas
//p!
its introverted solid to extraverted gas to introverted gas to extraverted solid)
__& not simply a 'too far away persuasion for anything more then quadrant gravity slopes via reflection & dampening'
the universe acts like a dampening field
each new stack thicker gets less kinetic
but
in our Quadrant 001s Terran Systems Yellow Stars physics (&++>**surrounding hood)
hot > cauterize > grease > widen > 0 < thin < slide < harden < cold
so is dark matter the left over Gravitron dots(spread across the blackhole plain)?
allowing them to get absorbed as the next reaction takes hold?
#noblepeaceprice
can the dark matter form a black hole?
yup
Please accept me in undergrad program...
u think na no way, are they after the ARORA well just look on Rogers Road right behind Rex building supplies homes thirty feet of grade seems that way? seems they are out to block the sunset aswell and the moon yes, as I did make the mistake of complainig the house was going higher on the hill well seems new rules in town now, my elevation here was an inverted valley now its nolonger it? and if thats the case and this home and theres were all planned to take water? what did they destroy? hard questions even here on earth that need clarification, not only dark matter? this is about what derection our world is taking as I see it?
Compressed vacuum that can be tapped.
A long winded way of saying none of you know what you are talking about.
Dark matter is dry water...
Wrong
Looking forward to see a Modified Gravity day, where 30 seconds are dedicated to Dark Matter, simply stating that we know it doesn't work, without further explanations...
And it would have been interesting to include in this vídeo all the DM detections that ocurred in the last decades, with all the colliders, detectors,... And funds keep coming in...
Space is a dieleçtric medium. Fermilab is out to lunch. With Tooney
dark matter is 4 element
earth water air fire
Thanks for the video. Could dark matter have something to do with space? Maybe dark matter and dark energy are inherent properties of space. We always assume that infinite space always existed and that the universe is expanding into this unlimited free space. Isn't there a better explanation to define space and how is it expanding and expanding into what?
I believe there is a political bias in the choice of your science talkers so I skipped all women and non-whites.
I am perfeclty fine with bias based on entertainment, like Neil Degrasse is entertaining.
The fact that top research centers get on board with the political bias is polarising everybody, forcing empathy onto people is not gonna work. It's getting unethical.
What?..... pffff
isn't our understanding of light incomplete?
how dark is in some "scientifics" brains :)
And we know what it is now^^
I don't believe in dark matter, but I don't have to work for some university. I designed electronics. Electronic systems never work as expected when there is test data, but every designer thinks his ideas will work.
dark matter isnt a physical, singular sort of object you "believe" in. Its the name of a problem with our understanding of the relationship between gravity and mass. We KNOW something is wrong, and until someone comes along flips relativity on its head and says "THIS is how gravity really works", we just have to assume we're missing a massive particle.
@@eattoast6378 My guess is modified gravity will win over dark matter....a field, not a particle.
How do we know neutrinos aren’t the “dark matter”?
There's not enough of it
@@nihlify why?
@@Hal_McKinney Because of their extremely low rest mass. For years, physicists wondered whether they were actually massless, but they were eventually measured to roughly one ten billionth the mass of a proton. No theory has shown how such a lightweight particle could account for 4/5 of the universe's matter.
@@CAPSLOCKPUNDIT like you said, neutrinos are not massless, so given enough time, with bazillions streaming out of every star in the universe every bazillo-second, eventually there’s enough mass.
@@Hal_McKinney you are missing to comprehend the amount of dark matter. the magnitude of dark matter we see affecting gravity is way less than the gazellion neutrinos emitted from stars. The dark matter is estimated to be 4/5 portion of total matter.
Always looking for something that doesn't exist....and postulating theories that can not be proven.
That's referred to as pseudoscience.
*cough* MOND *cough*
I have found a paper that explains the entire universe.....
Every thing.
I would bet on no dark matter/energy and an unknown something about gravity or the universe causing the dark ideas.
Spot on. I might well be wrong too, of course.
not missing mass. It only happens to stars and galaxies. So stars and galaxies must be propelling themselves slowly over time.
Possible, but it would have to be something unique to explain all the evidence.
@@tonywells6990 All the evidence of no dark matter?
@@lightdark00 No, I meant the evidence that supports the existence of dark matter.
Dark matter must be invoked to explain why far away galaxies don't spin according to current gravity equations from their observable light.
A much simpler answer will emerge in the future. This contorted view reminds how people explained how everything revolved around the earth before we understand more.
It has to explain far more than that. How do you expect to progress in the area if you want them to stop trying to explain it now and wait for a "simpler answer in the future". Before Copernicus scientific method was not in use, and cosmology was more like a philosophy. Most of the particles in the standard model have been discovered in the second half of the last century.
But, we know it's not a perfect solution, and we know that either our model of gravity is wrong, or there must be something that behave like matter according to it. The thing is, people have tried to come up with models that recapitulate the dark matter related issues, but it always end up not fitting other observations. So at this moment, dark matter actually being a form of matter is the main theory, with everybody ready to welcome any solid alternative if and whenever it presents itself.
@@arnaudnicolas2782 The issue is this video is coming across as facts, not theory. It is a rather wild idea with essentially no real data to support it, except that our current gravity theory fails. How about you fix the gravity theory? There seems to me a lot of other possibilities other than invoking some magic material.
@@murraymadness4674 dark matter is a solution that fits the data because it's a solution built by looking at the shape of the hole on the data and designing a piece that fits in it. It's deductive reasoning. The reason it's called matter is that once you look at that supposed piece, it has all the properties of conventional matter, except that it doesn't interact with light in a way we can detect. The reason it's talked about as seriously as if it was 100% real is that 1)it fits the data so insanely well it's uncanny and 2) despite throwing all the brilliant minds we can at it, nobody so far has comes close to fitting the data the way the dark matter model does.
But again physicists the world over will welcome any alternative model of the universe that account for the observation without using dark matter. But until then, the dark matter model fits so well, they'll keep using it to make predictions about the universe.
And, what is the victory of a cat on a hot tin roof?
This presentation suggest that DM is glass :D
The best way to detect DM is with layers of electrons as DM are dead particle waves (only a 4d spin w/cross-dimensional wave) but occasionally reconstitutes (this is why less light is observed in space.} Observing the electrons for wave change will give you hints to DM interaction as they reconstitute local dimensional adhesions.
Interesting. Would you be able to say a little more, please?
@@tim40gabby25 What aspect would you like more detail on?
@@Corvaire the reconstitution of 4-d waves, please.
Why call it "matter?" All we know so far, at least as far as I understand it, is that there is SOMETHING out there that is causing additional gravity.
Because all our observations indicate it acts just like matter in the sense that it bends space time like matter does. IOW it causes gravitational effects just as matter particles do. It seems to have mass and therefore also momentum.
Not extra gravity. Extra propulsion. The extra motion that theory and law cannot explain only happens to stars and galaxies. So stars and galaxies must somehow propel themselves, a slow acceleration over time.
If it was a slow acceleration then it would be the same for stars and galaxies because it would be based on time. The solar system is 5 billion years old. It is traveling 500,000 mi/h. That's an acceleration of 1 mi/h every 10,000 years. The Milky Way galaxy contains much more mass than our solar system so their mass is not a common factor to their motion right? The Milky Way galaxy is 13.7 billion years old. It is traveling 1.37 million mi/h. That's an acceleration of 1 mi/h ever 10,000 years. Their mass is not the same but their acceleration rates are the same even though they don't contain the same mass. Mass is not the common factor in their motion! Time is the common factor in their motion.
@@BigNewGames what are you on about? You are not making any sense.
@@frojojo5717 whoosh, went right over your head.
Talking about a "particle" that hasn't been verified. Keep in mind, *there is* real matter that can't be seen *within* the expanse of space. We shouldn't expect to see all the (real) matter in the universe. We can only see matter where there is fusion. Light also travels faster where there is less matter since time goes by faster in a greater measure of distance.
Dark matter is all the stuff left behind , that didn’t from regular matter
It's like old info as things found older then 15 billion years old, and dark mater should be called air as it's smaller then a grain of sand and has quantum levels of black holes.
Space is a photoshopped lie of the serpent...we are in an enclosed earth, see Genesis...The little g god of this world, for now, satan, is a liar, and the father of lies...run to the ONLY One Who can save you, JESUS, the only begotten SON of God, don't put your faith and trust in man, who cannot save you, call upon the NAME of the LORD JESUS. Romans 10:9-10 9That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. 10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation....
At first I wasn't sure, but this is actually a pretty great joke. Thanks for the laugh
🇺🇳28:41
Laugh at the earthling day
No big bang
When scientists failed to explain something they simply put the word "Dark"...
Not how it works
If one moonless night you hear a duck, see duck feathers, and notice duck prints but you can't see a duck around, it is reasonable to assume there is a duck but it's too dim to see. So until you figure out an explanation that doesn't involve a duck, you give it a cool name and look for it.
what if dark matter is just a side effect of Space transforming due to occupation by energy :)
Does not fit with observations
@@nihlify it all depends on how you look at what i said. We have no idea weather space is always the same or changing its properties over time. It is quite striking that there are Galaxies without any extra gravitational pull other than the gravitational pull from the observable matter. Also these galaxies are young, galaxies without a spiral structure. so taking that into consideration dark matter could be an illusion created by space that has been compressed and decompressed multiple times whic made its integrity more loose.
That's gravity! But i'll add, you can't explain observations like the bullet cluster, even if you modify gravity to match other observations
I think all matter is doing the affect of this and gravity is the side affect from the mater created
The DIELECTRIC VORTEX Technology by Ronald Frederick Sykes just G it
How to make cold nuclear fusion possible 😤
Cold fusion happens when you suspend hydrogen particles or protons in a vacuum using a weak magnetic field. When long wavelength light (visible) goes into the suspended protons they come out the other side as high energy radiation (X-rays, gamma rays) and heat. Use cold light having a long wavelength to make high energy light and heat.
@@BigNewGames cold fusion with palladium and deuterium , in beaker put heavy water and lithium salt and palladium as anode and lead as cathode if current pass ., palladium has cubic structure so palladium absorb more deuterium ,there palladium contracting because of current passing and deuterium+deuterium= helium +gamma ray