Knowing God’s thoughts: Einstein’s unfinished dream - Public lecture by Dr. Don Lincoln
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2024
- Albert Einstein spent the last decades of his life trying to work out a theory that would explain all known phenomena. He failed, but his vision has been pursued by generations of researchers, and there have been many popular science books and articles that imply that such a theory could be right around the corner. In this talk, Fermilab’s Dr. Don Lincoln will explain the current status in this timeless quest and give the audience a sense of the prospects for completing Einstein’s dream.
Dr. Lincoln is a senior scientist at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, America’s leading particle physics laboratory, and was a member of the research teams that discovered the top quark in 1995 and the Higgs boson in 2012. He is a recipient of the 2013 Outreach Prize from the European Physical Society and the 2017 Gemant Award from the American Institute of Physics. He is a Fellow of the American Physical Society and the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
For more information about research at Fermilab, please visit our website:
www.fnal.gov
The only thing missing is the alltime great ending: "After all - even at home - physics is everything!".
Hello Doc
I love the way you lecture on difficult subjects that a layman can understand. I have your course guidebooks on The Theory of Everything and The Evidence for Modern Physics plus your lectures. You are truly a wonderful lecturer. I'm 68 and your lectures and guidebooks keep me sharp.
Dr Don is no1 person in world for science fans.. should have hosted Cosmos, not Neil..
agreed
Both are fantastic Science communicators and we're lucky to have them.
Bearing in mind this is getting views n clicks - that people are INTERESTED - no reason Dr Don shouldn't have HIS own series too !
No
Dr lincon may be better in communication in science but cosmos is incomplete without Dr tyson.
"Being a lover of freedom, when the revolution came in Germany, I looked to the universities to defend it, knowing that they had always boasted of their devotion to the cause of truth; but, no, the universities immediately were silenced. Then I looked to the great editors of the newspapers whose flaming editorials in days gone by had proclaimed their love of freedom; but they, like the universities, were silenced in a few short weeks….
.
"Only the Church stood squarely across the path of Hitler’s campaign for suppressing truth. I never had any special interest in the Church before, but now I feel a great affection and admiration because the Church alone has had the courage and persistence to stand for intellectual truth and moral freedom. I am forced thus to confess that what I once despised I now praise unreservedly."
.
- Albert Einstein, Time magazine, 23rd December, 1940 p. 38
You made a wise chioce.. God is more real than you or I am...Now get ready to have your mind blown...the earth is not geological it is biological aqnd geology missed this...Dont be alarmed as this can be very disturbing....th-cam.com/video/P_O_RF6q2jQ/w-d-xo.html
Giants are the earth...th-cam.com/video/9KU7fm3LbaU/w-d-xo.html
The secret of stone mountain..th-cam.com/video/WVg4DR18Pyk/w-d-xo.html
Walls made of giants body parts..th-cam.com/video/Vrn7DwYm9MU/w-d-xo.html
You must see this on Devils Tower..Biological...th-cam.com/video/XGgy9BFWhpM/w-d-xo.html
_The word “God” is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honorable but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. For me the Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most childish superstitions._ -Albert Einstein, in letter written to Jewish philosopher Eric Gutkind, 3 January 1954 (a year before Einstein's death)
💕 ☮ 🌎 🌌
"childish superstitions"
Most people are pretty immature, Einstein in this case was as well.
He failed to see religion as a product of culture and evolution, thus still having scientific value, without which you can say bye bye to science.
Without assuming the presense of "the sacred/holy" in the world itself, there is no reason for scientific research and progress.
No reason to get stuck on the concept of god, this is so fuzzy and confused.
@@zarodgaming1844 Just because religion evolved doesn't mean it's still necessary, in fact it's now demonstrably stunting human progress, like a grumbling appendix.
@@zarodgaming1844 And what you fail to realize is that your religion has absolutely nothing to do with science, but is instead based on Arabian Bronze Age myths, fables and fairytales from older cultures, which were then embellished and refined over millennia to become a mind virus with which to wage psychological warfare, using elements such as "sacred/holy" and such. Science, on the other hand, is founded upon intersubjectively demonstrable facts in order to provide rational explanations for natural phenomena. So please, just do us all a favor and keep your religious mumbo jumbo to yourself. Thanks.
my "mumbo jumbo" had nothing to do with religion and everything to do with biology.
It is a fundamental dimension of what makes us "human", and what makes our science "humane".
That atheist sentiment will be the end of science, not religion.
Everyone always on that vibe of "science will bring world peace and make us communucate with the aliens" ... while it alone will only help them see how much useful materials they extract from our bodies.
Spiritual maturity (needs a better name) is to me one necessary evolutionary step as a specie to prosper, both as a force of cohesion an allow change, not something to throw away.
Einstein fell in the usual trap of that "angry rebel atheism", "ha ha, talking snake, funny story bro" and blind faith in science alone that somehow is supposed to bring us towards prosperity but got us into 1 world war and is destroying the culture that made science happen.
(also ... I would not call Einstein immature for no reason ... it's years of study and confrontation with my peers at university both secular and religious ... u all kinda proving my point in a way)
The audio levels are so low, at full blast it is barely understandable.
might be your tech issues i thought the sound was fine with my Bose bluetooth noise cancelling headphones.
@@sirvapalot Much less volume than most other videos, including those from Don, and indeed, hardly understandable at max volume.
fine on my mac
OMG at 21:50 I laughed so hard. You're the best Don
The last question "If we finally figure out the theory of everything, what can we do with that knowledge?"
I love Don's first reaction!
Q: what we can do with Theory of Everything?
A: Everything!
It could be that if we figure out a Theory of Everything, the universe will disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre. This may have already happened . . . .
We can reveal the supreme truth of universe and that is the main work of humankind 😇
After figuring out the theory of everything, the theory will have to be checked for correctness. I'm afraid the figuring out part will require a smart generation of scientists, but the checking out will befall to the generation of Flatearthers. They will disprove the theory in 5 minutes and we'll be in dark ages again.
If it's still a theory, nothing can be done with it, since it has not been proven to be true.
Saw Dr. Don in the title and clicked faster than a proton in a particle accelerator.
Ptolemy, Kepler, Newton & Einstein. They'll tell you: there's almost always more to the story...
Just shudup and calculate.
The saga continues
@Arastushukooh well, ... okay. I *think* Feynman would have gotten that.
I can never focus on any smart information for more then 5 minutes... BUT THIS MAN... I'm speechless. I've been watching him for hours
What a guy, clever and nice with it! Would love an evening in the pub with a pint or two (I'm buying!) with him! 👍🍺
You have to be a fellow Brit!?! Pub ha
Haha me too! 😂 But also with a computer and alot of pen and papers then haha. 😅
Better buy him a decent microphone
Aaa err eetywy wtyereyeyw
All forces are inertia. Gravity magnetism and electricity are all the same thing. This video is materialism. Poison to the mind.
its fantasy but they really believe it.....Every aspect of standard science is wrong on every level.....no electricity, no clue. Biology, chemistry, geology, astronomy, cosmology, history..........the theory of everything is electricity in a plasma environment. I cringe when I listen to the rubbish they go on about, they know nothing, the whole lot of them.......
Fermilabs next project needs to involve studying how microphones work
I am fascinated with microphones too. I might have some of the same questions? I also might be able answer, or help you disagree ? with what I have studied in school, for many years, and observed upon the scientific method. I hope you like my reply. (fyi, I just got accused of being hateful while mentoring at a grade school. When I was saying we should love each other!)
That was a fascinating and comprehensive presentation. I was impressed by what we know as a species, and your honesty about what we don't know in Physics. This was the first time that I heard that there are different types of "Dark Matter." I will now think of that in the plural. Thanks
I think that's just two types of dark. I think. He may have said that dark energy doesn't interact with the Higgs field..? It's just a fudge to blow the universe up quicker.
I i lo III öffnet 09
Dr. Lincoln has an extraordinary gift for explaining complex subjects to nonscientists like me.
I think we will all die not knowing God’s thoughts.
I am pretty sure where Dark Energy is.
Try my ex's heart.
ha, "below quarks, there be dragons." Don is great.
If you only knew how right you are..Watch this...Living in the eye of a dragon..th-cam.com/video/c4ekm3DZpIk/w-d-xo.html
This is exactly what Im lying awake at night over. Sence I was a kid. Loved how you used ourselves as an example. Thats what Ive been thinking of too. If we can get some of the missing pieces by looking at everything with "different eyes" or with other messurment methods or tools. Is your course for free, and how did you mean us younger can help solve this mysteries? Also, thank you for this very interesting video. 😊🙏
I have the same inquiry...
What physical laws??. They're all invented and approximate. 20th century physics
I think professor is hassling his wife with this title, even some of the atheists physicists sometimes believe there is a unique force behind this universe but biologists are always kind of hardcore atheists, they are allergic to the word god😂
Most of time the word god is used as a metaphor by physicists
@Mean Bob No doubt, beliefs have nothing to do with science however, saying scientists don't have beliefs is like saying no MD smokes or judges can't be corrupted. Humans are a complicated "quantic" machines that can live with a superposed opposite states :). Anyway, this not the subject of my comment. I just wanted to say that professor intentionally add word god in this title to chase his wife :). If you put scientists (as humans) in beliefs graph; physicists will have highest marks, I don't say they are not atheists, I'm saying they can be at least open to religious concepts and vocabulary maybe because in physics there is those hints of everything theory or supreme intelligence managing the universe or unique laws everywhere... but this not the case for biologists, they will have lowest marks; sorry I mean zero :).
🔶 The Conglomerate of Universes - Universe Creation Theory 🔶
combining GOD/Nature, ancient religions, astronomy, cosmology, fined-tuned laws of physics/general relativity/quantum mechanics, chaos theory/fractals, laws of biology & chemistry, linguistics/code-breaking, programming the Universe/GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4 theory, mysticism, and philosophy/ anthropic principle
"Energy can’t be created or destroyed, only transformed/transferred in an isolated system." General relativity's black holes, white holes, Big Bang and wormholes.
‘The BIG Bang-Bit Bang’ inflation/expansion of energy₇₄ and information into the void 13.77 billion years ago was a supermassive white hole spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our ‘parent₇₄ universe’. This duality combines general relativity’s singularities of infinite density breaking through spacetime in ‘Cosmic Egg hatchings’ of all created universes within ‘The Conglomerate’: multiverse with no random quantum fluctuation bubble universes, no parallel universes or parallel worlds, and no universes with different physical laws. Our Universe is 1-in-200 billion ‘self-similar offspring’ each with the same inherited ‘DNA’.
“In the beginning”, the Planck density of the core of a SBH is a birth canal. ‘Quantum bounce SBH-SWH seed transitions’ are ‘quantum tunneling umbilical wormholes’ with energy-matter and data transformed/transferred, albeit scrambled and encoded. The ubiquitous cause-and-effect ‘circle of life cycle’: birth-life-death-transformation-rebirth explains infinite space and eternity - a necessity. Reproduction is GOD/Nature’s plan for greatly spreading life from cells to universes.
GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4 is the #1 program₇₄/law/initial₇₄ condition (Seal #2).
Why does this Universe exist? It’s our playground (god + run = ground₆₄).
- This is Seal #1a of the 7seals.blogspot.com . Only the returned Christ & Einstein reincarnated could produce this - it's triggered The Apocalypse/ Revelation which is NOT the 'end of the world'. COVID-19 is part of Seal #4: S=19 (18.6) Theory.
what we know is a drop, what we dont know is an ocean, what we dont know that we dont know is universe
I’ve been looking forward to this
Twice the pride double the fall
I don’t believe science will ever solve the mystery of life and how it started, because Science don’t believe it was a creation by a creator that put everything single thing in it’s perfect form to still be existing in it’s perfect equation.
The human race as we know it has existed for approximately 50,000 years. This makes it approximately 800 lifetimes old, assuming a lifetime to be from sixty to seventy years.
Of these 800 lifetimes, about 650 of them were passed by cave dwellers. Nearly all the manufactured products, luxury items, and technological conveniences we enjoy today were invented or perfected within the duration of only the last five to seven lifetimes.
Remarkably, fewer than 100 generations have walked the Earth since mankind learned how to write. Only a handful of generations have experienced our present understanding and current mastery of electricity, including the light bulb, the electric motor, radio and television, microwave ovens, computers and networks, and online videos.
And yet, ten or twenty thousand years ago, and almost certainly even long prior to this, humans had essentially the same physical strength and prowess, as well as intellectual capacity and ability to think and reason, as we do today.
Perhaps astoundingly, for all this while, right beneath our feet was everything needed to build and construct a vehicle that could, under our control, leave the bounds of this very planet that we call home, and venture out beyond our own solar system, while still communicating back and forth.
Who knows what else is just within the grasp of our next generations and in the very-near-future; what else exists as-yet-undiscovered right beneath our feet, a mere moment away in time or in thought, a discovery that will be realized and brought to fruition, not by wishes or by magic, but through hard work, and an unfettered process of being allowed the freedom to think, and to imagine, and to invent, and to build? - j q t -
I've been watching Susskind's cosmology lectures and this stitches together much of that content. Thanks for the upload. Fascinating!
It seems we expect lot of DM surrounding all galaxies in order to explain rotational velocity of their distant stars much higher than those of planets in solar systems, in other words that Newton’s laws when applied to galaxies demand this DM amount. But I have heard that DM permeates also our solar system , then it should be already accounted for in Newton’s laws! The fact we are looking for DM since more than 30 years without any success, in my opinion, is that there should be another reason to explain those unexplained higher velocities and we had better disregard DM at all.
While doctor Don was explaining current Standard Model, something crossed my mind:
1. We still didn't detect graviton.
2. Higgs field gives mass to particles and matter.
3. Mass is curving the space giving the sensation of gravity.
q: Is Higgs field in any way pathway to explaining gravity and/or detecting graviton?
that was exactly my thought as well! consider: what if the higgs field is space itself? and that matter, by binding to the higgs field, puts a drag on it. But this idea is quickly dismissed by the fact that all gravitation depends only on energy- the mass of quarks makes up almost nothing of our real mass, the only reason they need mass is so that they travel slowly enough to form nuclei. the binding energy of the quarks is what makes up most mass, and in general it's always energy that causes gravitation. what do you think?
We still need to be open to the possibility that there is no theory of everything
there has to be one, but it might be supremely complex, which is why no one can figure it out
@@eyle6839 has to be? Richard Feynman surely did not think so th-cam.com/video/MEqMM2Co_9c/w-d-xo.html
@@nadavdanieli i meant that it could be like the old circle model of our solar system, technically true, but so complicated that its useless in practice
@@eyle6839 I am totally lost now, what circle model of the solar system, the geocentric model?
@@nadavdanieli yeah, ptolemy's version
I think it's time to stop using words, that do reference to religious superstitions, in science....
thank u so much....
wonder what kind, if any, force unifying behavior is occurring at ultra cold Bose-Einstein condensate [lack of] temperature...
Writes.for.cnn..RIGHT THERE HE HAS ZERO.CREDIBILITY...ZERO ZILTCH..
.
That microphone was horrible. Don't ever use it again. I could barely understand anything.
thank you so much for this!!!! please do more long form videos.
thanks Doctor Lincoln, that was a fascinating lecture.
Who else is addicted to the fermilab lecture series !?
Haha! How Don introduced himself for the video was so good! I could listen to his lectures all day
I strongly suspected tongue in cheek even before the video started ... ;-)
How did subatomic particles get grouped into families? Why don't they stand on their own?
common properties, in the same way elements in the periodic table get grouped by their common properties
It's always fascinating listening to Don talk -- much of what he says I have to revisit before I get it, but it's worth the effort!
Dr Lincoln: could you please do a video showing numerous examples of written homework exercises that graduate level physics major need to complete to pass their courses?
And, could you do a video on the relevance & importance & necessity (I'll let you decide how relevant & how necessary)
of solutions to differential equations in physics, especially solutions that come from symmetry methods?
I have a $285 Handbook of Nonlinear PDEs on my desk by Andrei D Polyanin & Valentin F Zaitsev, 2nd edition, which is a GOLDMINE of solution, as exact as they can find, for hundreds of different nonlinear PDEs. I also have their handbooks on Linear PDEs and on Nonlinear ODEs.
what if at 5.5 billion years ago gravity lost its grip because the distance between galaxies became to great to completely slow the outward movement of the big bang and therefore resulted in a zero g increase of velocity
Doesn't explain acceleration... Your model would result in decelerating expansion followed by linear expansion, accelerated expansion never happens in your model, yet that what we seem to observe... One theory that can use gravity as an expansion accelerator is a BIG CRUNCH where our cosmic event horizon is much, much smaller than the size of the universe, and we only see our tiny bubble, where the universe looks pretty homogeneous... everything is accelerating towards a central point / black hole ... The growing Hierarchy of Greater Attractors is lending credence to this idea...
--
Our galaxy is moving inward at a slower speed than those nearer the centre, and galaxies further out are moving slower than us, but all are accelerating towards the centre. The universe is spreading out, from a dense spherical shell, where it eventually hits a central black hole.. If outward expansion was occurring in this model, it would be decelerating expansion, as in your model, forming a universe shell and inward rebound - another BIG CRUNCH!
--
This is not my preferred 'Dark Energy' solution but at least it does not involve inventing a new force or energy source.
Hello have been watching your videos for a while and although I have no formal physics education I have about as good of understanding of the standard model, General relativity and other precepts of science and physics as one can have without a good understanding of a lot of the math behind it. I understand that describing things through analogies like your description of the higgs field as water and the higgs boson as water a molecule.
So given my understanding of Particle physics and that i understand the somewhat fuzzy barrier between the macroscopic and the quantum and that at the quantum level there are bizarre properties such and entanglement, or superposition. What would you say if I told you about the ability to generate a "Macroscopic Quantum Property that allowed me to cancel the mass of a macroscopic object? To be clear that is not exactly whats happening but what is happening is indeed the generation or creation of a macroscopic quantum property and is actually more astonishing than mass cancellation but which is indeed whats being measured. You would tell me I'm a wak job right? Here is the thing Upon further investigation of these three items one of them already has a working prototype and apparently the other two the science behind them has been demonstrated to work. Normally I would not bother someone like you with such craziness however when considering the source I now have some serious questions about this.
You are a much smarter man than most and I was hoping that you could take a look at the science described in these 3 documents which is explained in a very detailed way And maybe you can tell us all how possible this is. As the US Navy seems to think that they can, and in one case have already created these devices. Just copy and paste the 3 numbers into a google search.
1. High-Frequency Gravitational Wave Generator (2017)
Patent US20180229864A1
2. Craft using an inertial mass reduction device (2016)
Patent US10144532B2
These are all patents for the US Navy that have all been approved after being denied once but them providing a demonstration they were then all three approved. There are alot of people out their that would love to hear a physicist of your caliber make a statement about these Read the applied science contained within each patent! Thank you.
I hate the use of the word 'god'. This is science, not silly superstition.
Various particles interaction with Higg's field analogy with human and fish interaction with water is really interesting.
As an analog, yes. But it limits the Higgs field to a single thing, a Boson; a misstep in reasoning as there is no evidence for this limitation-by-definition.
Perhaps, fields exist differently than "things"...
i.e. A array between 0 and 1 will always be contained without the fields of 0/1 or 1/1. The mediant, all numbers between 0 and 1, are contained within the definition of 1/0 (zeno's paradox - infinite divisions). The Boson is set to 1/1 by the analogy.
Conjecture: two fields, one force - infinite interaction.
Loved the talk. Im so over news.
How is all this financed? Which would also be a fascinating lecture. Thank you.
Thank you! Awesome! It just shows if your job is something you love, you will never work a day in your life.
I say this all the time!
Is the Universe of EXISTANCE expanding into NON EXISTANCE ???
One hour and twenty minutes of Dr. Don?!?!?!! 👏🎉🤩
It's not enough!!!!
you doing it for me Don thank you, im fascinated and in awe.
So in the very early early universe there is no particle has mass because temperature of universe is very very high. And as the universe cooled down the higgs field turned on and some particles (quarks, electrons etc.) got their mass.
That is very interesting.
But is that mean if we increase temperature of some matter then it also loses its mass.
And also in LHC as temperatures are very very high but is that enough to turn off higgs field?
I loved this thank you for posting ❤️
Got to watch this a little later but I really like the title of the video, especially considering your reasoning for naming it. I think the people who get caught up in an argument over the correctness, political or otherwise, of the title really shouldn't be watching this in the first place 😂🤣. I'm a Christian and have zero problems with anyone else's views, just so long as they are respectful of others views too. I'm looking forward to watching this, I hope it's as good as as it started out 🤞
Bullshit ! Its like hulucingeneic acid trip trying to tell you they figured it all out but can't put it into words.
Just keep giving us money one day we can will show you.
Another great video. Thank you Dr. Lincoln!!
HOW ARROGANT and Anthropocentric!!!
Man great content as always but I wish you guys could have recorded his voice separately for TH-cam with a better microphone 🎤
Fantastic lecture, thank you Professor and Fermilab.
What a great and clear concise lecture!!! And funny and entertaining at that...amazing. Thanks for the upload.
I just started watching this but I hope Dr. Don tells us the secrets of the time crystals in this lecture. Don we have to go back.. back to the future!
Gradually Growing from thickness of cell membrane to size of earth really takes lots of time but we can reduce this time taken by using relativity.
Iii$$$8$87
&
I’m
Nmn
N
M
Mmn
N
Mmm n
M N mnmnn m my mom no
M mmnjm I’m mmm mmm mmm
Hh ink Hh
X Dudu I i ouhhubuhb
You are a incredible scientist and educator sir!! Wow!! So clear and we'll spoken. Thank you so much!
Conservation of Spatial Curvature (both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature)
Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together.
------------------------
String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension?
What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine.
Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
“We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr
(lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958)
The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics?
When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry.
Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other.
Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change.
Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons?
Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension?
Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons
. Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules.
Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. We know there is an unequal distribution of electrical charge within each atom because the positive charge is concentrated within the nucleus, even though the overall electrical charge of the atom is balanced by equal positive and negative charge.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137.
1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface
137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted.
The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. The model grew out of that simple idea.
I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles.
.
I am trying to listen to every word. You got a camera that takes 100 megapixels pictures 40,000,000 times a second and obviously you spent less money on the microphone. Lol. Had to use headphones. Amazing content thank you Dr Don.
I had the same knee jerk reaction to the audio when I started listening. I wish he recorded his audio locally on another recorder and had it replaced afterwards. I found by lowering the volume of my mobile phone's speaker it attenuated the distortion enough for me to hear him clearly and not be distracted by it.
Great content.
Most fascinating marvellous lecture ever I saw listen and digest thanks🙏🙏🙏🙏
Any mention of the timeron particle that controls time, and the xyzeron particle that control space?
Popcorn time 📺🍿
Excellent! Thank you.
Finally, a Donald we don't have to duck!
Finally, a Donald that isn't racist
1:39 as if secular science and religion are 2 different things well It should be but it isnt.... secular scinece has become a religion in its own right ever since the secular scientists deliberately kicked out God from their equations.... that started early on in the 1860's with Lyell and Darwin
I'm so early I don't even know what to say yet.
POLECTRON FIELD: cell: a + & a - particle split by Full Split Energy as a positron+ & electron-. Bonds to 12 neighbours
MATTER: p+ / e- = half cell (& a cell as +-+ / -+-)? Polarises field as + & - shells. SPIN: centre polarisation axis
LECKY: absolute charge. MASS: particle lecky. INERTIA: rebalancing field kicks mass. STRONG GRAVITY: field repels mass
MOND: lecky density slows acceleration/TIME and shrinks cells, loss to gravity gradients grows voids, aids acceleration
BIG BANG: more proton-antiproton pairs malformed as proton-muon than antiproton-antimuon so hydrogen beat antihydrogen
POSITRONIUM: e_p. Muon: ep_e. Proton: pep. Neutron: pep_e. Tau: epep_e. Neutron mass is halfway between muon and tau
ANTIMATTER: 1,2 e_p pairs annihilate. 3: proton+anti proton or muon+anti muon. 4: neutron+anti neutron. 5: tau+anti tau
WEAK FORCE: unstable atoms form and annihilate e_p pairs. BETA- DECAY: pep_e => pep e. BETA+: pep + new e_p => pep_e p
NUCLEAR FORCE: neutron electrons bond to protons. ENTANGLEMENT: correlation broken by interaction? Physical link?
BLACK HOLE: atoms cut into neutrons fused as higher mass tau cores (epep). Field rotates. Core annihilates: ep => cell?
PHOTON: cell polarisation/lateral shift wave. LONGITUDINAL WAVE: gravitational wave, neutrino: 1 to 3 cell wave
DOUBLE SLIT: photon/particle field warps diffract and interfere, guiding the core. Detectors interfere with guides
COMPLEXITY:. Closed system complexity reduces over time. Uniformly (dis)ordered (hot)/cold field is simplest
Am I the only one that hopes Dr. Don is directly responsible for the next big physics breakthrough? And us and the next generation puts his name up there with the likes of Einstein!
Well, there's two of us now.
CMS weighs 14,000 tons (44:29)? That seems heavier than a ship?
No. The smallest tanker I was on was 14605 tons when full. Ms Cardissa, Shell Tankers.
The Ms Niso was 121293 tons.
The largest tankers are over 500.000 tons 564.763 tons for the Seawise Giant.
@@boterlettersukkel Yes, but there are many ships which are far less than 14,000 tons. My point being, it seems odd how the CMS weighs more than the larger collider detector, which is only 8,000 tons?
IMO, we do not truly "know" about forces since we do not know how they do what they do.
Have to agree old boy, E= Mc2 is a bit of a schoolboy's joke in the physicists canteen. Look up: Eric Lerner on the FPPfusion channel, he's got some open minded vids about everything.
The human species is about two hundred years or so into scientific inquiry and discovery. We are still very naive and childlike regarding the universe. If we could come back in five hundred years (assuming that life on the planet survives) then we might see some real scientific progress.
_"The reason I like this quote from Einstein is ... he wanted to know WHY the universe is the way it is ... and he never found out"_ well the reason is obvious really if you want to know *why* anything happened you are ultimately assuming a choice has been made which is the product of a mind! How do we know that because all non-equilibrium states are thermodynamically ordered states and order can only be created by *work* not *heat* which is *directed energy* which requires a choice to be made and therefore predicts a mind.
then he begins with _"the first thing ... what are the ultimate building blocks and by that I mean the smallest things of which matter is composed"_ So his whole idea of _"everything"_ is limited to the physical universe devoid of meaning, but meaning is an essential part of the universe because humanity depends upon it all the time! So to start with I would propose a different model for the origin of the universe more consistent with the laws of physics than the big bang which does include meaning:
BIBLICAL CREATION MODEL:
Mass of universe = 1e80 protons = 1.67e53 Kg
Escape velocity = v = √(2GM/r) therefore r = 2GM/v^2
Substitute M = 1.67e53 and v = 3e8 m/sec (speed of light)
Minimum dia of the universe to avoid collapse into a black hole is 52.5 billion light years! Matter of the universe could not be created in a big bang! Particle pair production at CERN confirms antimatter exactly equals matter, (first law of thermodynamics) so no net residual of matter.
Running the universe back in time is not the same for energy and matter. A candle burning (like star we see today) ENERGY can go back to a point but MATTER cannot the candle gets BIGGER and STOPS at maximum order minimum entropy! Stars must by the second law do the same!
The real Big Bang was an expansion of space followed by wave energy (no mass except earth at centre) to nearly the size we observe today agrees with deSitter solution (1917) of Einstein's wave equation finally accepted in 1931.
Before Day 1: _"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth"_ Earth with space stretched out
Day 1: God said _"let there be light"_ expansion of space and photon energy giving us the very smooth CMBR
Day 4: God said _"he made the stars also"_ after the expansion by collapsing the wave energy into matter.
The double slit experiment shows a MIND measuring a wave collapses the wave to produce a particle with a history written retrospectively in time! Matter from mind solves the antimatter problem, the gravity problem and the starlight time problem with no special pleading! With earth existing before the stars it is unlikely all the wave energy would come from one point because too close and the energy would blast the water off the earth and distant quasars being so massive the wave energy would be too week by the time it got there plus there is the ordered placement of stars on swirling galaxies so I propose the following.
Day 1 God created light at the centre of every star in its highly ordered place filling the universe with wave energy which produced the very smooth CMBR we observe. After 3 days of expansion on day 4 His infinite mind collapsed most of that energy to form every star, black hole, planet (beyond earth) and moon. It means the history of the stars we observe is real and does go back billions of years in our frame of reference calculated by the distance but in their frame of reference that history was created instantaneously backwards from 6000 years ago and Adam created on day 6 could see the stars immediately.
Here's the temperature based TIme Dilation calc, Garrett is working on a proof for the velocity equation ...
Natural Particle Weight Formation/Growth times
If an electron forms in one second (de-ionisation time of a hydrogen atom) the time to form a 10C^3 Particle weight, would be 2 seconds dilated by the depth in the G space by a factor of 2 or 4 seconds, if you consider 4 seconds dilated by 4 times the electron weight for a top level neutron, you get 16 seconds, this is a linear progression of weights and time dilation so ...
T=(C^3Weight / 5)^2 seconds.
If we can hold ourselves together for 16 seconds we're making Lithium ;-)
(C) M.B.Eringa Aug 2021
I'll throw this one out to you as well ;-) ...
Gravity
Take a second to think about the weight space , it is directly related to the heat space.
I.E. The higher the temperature the lighter the particle becomes until it breaches the 2000°C. temperature range. After that it starts to become heavier. We live in the -676.5 Celsius to +15000 Celsius weight space.
So take the temperature up to big bang level (10^18 or higher),
remembering that heat destroys time dilation, time dilation is compressed space.
So heat destroys/consumes space.
The big bang is therefore the top end of our Universal heat space, or a zero dimensional space (I.E. there is no spacial expansion at those temperatures).
Now add the fact that density also causes time dilation, and at MAX temp the density of the Bang space is maximum as well.
Hence time stops relatively in the big bang.
So for photons to persist, they have to inherit the density time dilation from the big bang, which is in fact still “there”, it classes as HyperDimenional (I.E. temp/weight/distance relative to us is less than Planck length.)
So all mass is an expression of this heat density inside the photon itself, the more photonic weight in a particle the heavier it becomes, expressing the “compression” factor of the big bang in an inverse squared way into our 3d space.
So space flows into the aperture feeding the heat I.E. Gravity, the more heat/weight the more Gravity flow towards said aperture.
**Time Dilation moderates Gravity the same way temperature redshifts so Double the temperature/weight, halves the Gravity flow, but doubles it's expressed distance/volume.
(C) April 2020, M.B.Eringa AKA Einstein.
**
Radium:-1. A pipet structure that Photonium energy is drawn into/through, likely has larger pixelated volume densities or "bubbles" going down from the 1C^3 weights to the required 10,11 and 12 C^3 weights to get the flow densities required for plutonium production.
2. Likely to be come in three depths/sizes 10C^3, 11C^3 and 12C^3 giving the resulting 13C^3 Plutonium isotope.
Photonium:- The actual heat energy being transferred to the proton masses.
Great video Dr Lincoln,
There are so many problems with the current models, compressed space / distance physics does solve them IMO ;-)
What we don't have is skin theory, here's a page I wrote in response to the "on the shoulders of Everrett" videos ...
Skin Theory Introduction.
I've watched a few of this series now and you all are up against Particle Skin versus Particle Static Structure physics, or in my words "Skin Theory".
The Static Structure is the Heat Density packet of the particle.
i.e. heavily time-dilated/compressed because of temperature, measured by QCD temperature frequency and inverse square law e=1/(R2/R1)^2
The "Entropic/Information/Kinetic/Entanglement/Any interaction event" are all remembered in the 0C^3+ side of the 1C^3 particle.(which is a density harmonic of the core 10^4.5 degree Celsius photonium particle (which is not visible because x,y,z compression has gone less than plank (i.e. C^3 scale is a temperature-distance x,y,z compression scale in the metric system)))
I've only just started to write the skin pages for Relativity as I know it, and I thank you all for helping me with the question.
If you followed the above, here's the problem the theory throws at me ...
- Particles with temps of 10^18°C have a time-dilation of 4.e+34 seconds to one. This means that no matter how much energy we throw at the electron the core energy that makes it persist will not show any movement for 1.271e+24 Years! (These particles are less than Planck and only reflect back into our space because of x,y,z space spacial entanglement i.e. Gravity WISC or WIMP)
- The only way for any kind of interaction that we call matter in space
(i.e. move an atom in any direction or induce electric current)
is for the skin to zero°C aperture to "snap" across the golf ball of preexisting SR space particle weights"
(this does give us Inertial resistance to any movement which is a yay! event for me but also demands superposition of all the stacked particle weight skins back to zero°C which have time-dilations of 16 and 4 seconds which could also be problematic, my answer is currently they all "snap" and an invisible SR particle weight has two skins, the outside skin can distort and become "visible" and "disappears" once the atom/particle has moved past ;))
So lets say we apply this "Field of holes" theory to laser beam quantum entanglement.
- The laser emits particles that are an aperture in our space that exhibits a temperature of x°C
- On the C^3 scale the photon itself is x+1C^3 and x+1°C weight scales.
- The QCD temperature frequency of both lasers is consuming space which contains "potential" apertures.
- The aperture space inside the box can only replenish itself at C.
- The potential for a "Sympathetic" photon to appear is anywhere in the distance between the two lasers spacial phase causes an aperture to grow, an aperture with a primed harmonic of both laser temperatures.
- All photons in the equation are balanced through the flow of space towards the apertures causing temperature frequency phase equivalence.
- If you change the ambient temperature inside the box you should be able to moderate the entanglement effect by removing all particle weights "lighter" and exposing the desired SR particle weight where you want entanglement to occur.
Cheers, Thankyou againI appreciate your time(s)
I'm gonna throw this out to the QGR as well.
M.B.Eringa (2022)
Here’s a thought… so dark energy is 68% of the universe budget and dark matter is 27% of that budget. Who says dark energy is all the same? What if what we call ‘dark energy which is called dark just because we don’t know what it is and we only know of the effect. The same with dark matter. So what if dark energy is actually say, 12 different energies that when combined give a sum total effect equal to what we see now? The same for dark matter. Also I say 12 energy things because in the 5% that we know we have 12 particles in that.
So what I’m saying is that by looking for one great big honking energy thing that’s almost absolutely completely everything, 68% compared to 27% for the next biggest thing DM and then everything that we actually know is only 5% and that 5% is actually made of 12 particles but realistically it’s really just 4 of the 12 with the others just being around almost never and only for specific events. So that massive 68% that is by name, totally unknown other than its energy, about 68% of absolutely everything and has a measurable effect. Well that would be more than likely to be a combination of energies or things that we perceive as energy rather than just one great big single thing.
God is not absent in science. My late father AJ Meyer II, a theoretical physicist, mathematician and inventor, was also a Holy Spirit filled Christian believer. My father finished what Einstein began and often quoted his mentor PAM Dirac, "God used beautiful mathematics in creating the world." A true friend to Teller, dad would share his thoughts on Our Creator God Yeshua Ha Mashiach God made flesh. God is very much interested in everything mankind does and most importantly wants us to know Him personally. We also have an enemy, Satan Lucifer who is in competition with The Triune Godhead. Only The Blood of Jesus can redeem one's soul. In Jesus' Agape Love, Michelle Katherine Orts oldest daughter to the late Physicist AJ Meyer II
The Norwegian-American physicist Ivar Giæver (nobel laureate in physics 1973) criticised the American Physical Society (APS) for it’s climate decision.
vimeo.com/368744477
It appeared like this also when APS mand the climate decision. It was not discussed among the members like other scientific topics. This also shows in their climate statement.
APS: The global warming is incontrovertible.
Ivar Giæver: This shows that climate policy has become religion.
Average temperature of the earth has gone up 0,8 degree C from 1860 until 2000.
APS: Global warming is occurring, if not immediate action is taken, significant disruption to physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occure.
Ivar Giæver: But through these 150 years all this has become better. Why is it suddenly changing and getting worse? It is a mystery.
The climate policy has become an attack on democracy. Computer-calulations with their climate models compete with human thinking and that appears to be the main point. What they call science is dictatorship. What they call science gets this meaning, that you shall leave it for somebody else to think for you. In this case the use computers to try to tell you that you are not qualified because the scientists have so much more systematic information and advanced computer to do the calculations, that you with your own thinking gets nothing to say.
Has anyone considered the possibility that the Higg's Field is not uniform and that is the reason the stars move faster than expected given the amount of mass in the galaxies? A weakening Higg's Field might also provide an explanation for the expansion of the universe. The problem with the idea of a varying Higg's Field is explaining why it varies, i.e., the mechanism governing it. Just some meandering thought I had, so I thought I would throw it out there to get reactions, from people with more ability than I to consider.
I have a problem accepting the ideas that there is some mystical invisible matter permeating the universe along with some unknown unmeasured energy that magically turns on and off.
Wayne Y. Adams
B.S. Chemistry (ACS Certified)
M.S. Physics
R & D Chemist (9 yrs.)
Physics Instructor (33yrs., retired)
Practical people tend to exchange information and skills by demonstration and observation, building integrated Intuitions and learning by doing.., so Theorists who are mostly concerned with future designs of techniques and technology to better understand and utilise the knowledge, reiterate whatever the current state of knowledge may be.
If your top Theorists get stuck in a particular mode or thought pattern that is "proven" to work, but has no reasonable explanation to substantiate it, then a reiteration of the derivivation of experienced intuition "missed a turn" on the path to reasonable certainty.
The fundamental elemental principles of Physics and Mathematics have been discovered and revealed by repeatable observation of general conventions and practices under the system of "believe half of what you think you understand and nothing that you hear", because "nobody knows" anything, with absolute certainty. "Precision is not Accuracy, but it can be thought to correctly identify an objective in completeness.., which is why Philosophy identifies this Eternity-now Interval Conception Superposition-point here-now-forever as WYSIWYG in the most practical Intuitive way, and the wave-particle coordination-identification of a Pure Dynamic Mathematical Disproof Methodology is a Theoretical job forever.
So Singularity is Infinity/forever, as experienced, and existence is a Bio-logical re-evolution circularity quantization cause-effect, Theoretically.
Universe Expansion
As for expansion itself, there is a temperature based 2 directional tensor on every particle we have ever observed from plasma photons, up to any atomic weight we have encountered so far.
If you consider a deeper weight particle lives at an interference point and is constantly being fed expressed heat from it's immediately (doubled depth and distance) deeper particle, or from ambient temperature at its' depth in the weight space. The deepest particle interferes a new weight and goes the summed interfered temperature C^3 or degree Celsius deeper in its' weight space, the internal "Cavendish" tensors from the particle depth SR monodimensional BB space, pulls the particle back "up" the temperature scale. The particle will shed two "half temperature" photons back up the atomic pipe causing interference in the half distance position of the atomic pipe and the same thing happens at that temperature scale, all the way back to the aperture of the atom and being expressed as a zero degree Celsius photon particle (No velocity at all).
If you consider the temperature over distance equation, and add in the redshift of the exhibited photons you realise that the redshift of a "stable" atom by definition on the C^3 scale has to achieve a temperature of zero degrees Celsius as it finds its' position in the "visible space".
So instead if the stacked atom we observe, we actually have a redshifted temperature pipet from the Big Bang , too our visible space, which is expressing a Big Bang instantaneous explosive energy at Zero Degrees Celsius and Zero Velocity!
This is our visible aperture of space, and it (the Universe) simply started growing when the expression of the BB in its' GR'd observable frame of reference (i.e. expanding at C) , a C velocity time dilated by its' temperature and redshifted by the decreasing to zero degrees aperture space allowing zero degree Celsius photons to "simply appear" in our space, expanding our Universe one photon at a time multiplied the the "Skin Depth Aperture" of our observed universe.
Atomic particle formation, is the other side of the BB energy cycle through our space, which means the atoms are slowly in comparison "swallowing" photons that are too hot for the zero degree space and their journey back to the Big Bang has started.
When you consider the amount of matter that we observed versus the amount of empty space, it's easy to see why we are still expanding, and likely will continue to do so for ever.
(C) M.B.Eringa; S Hawking; 1989
Greek philosophy started as nature philosophy, then moral and political philosophy took over and poetry of their gods turned into dictatorship.
The first Greek nature philosophers came up with many good ideas of nature, but did not find methods to find out what was right. Moral and political philosophy took over. As a reaction against the democracy in Athen, the soldier and poet Aiskhylos said that Zevs was god over all gods and ruled with an universal moral, so dictatorial that all that happened was his work. So this was “a theory of everything”. But how could one of those gods that sprang out of chaos get so much power as if there were no more chaos?
It was poetry that became the Greeks answer to Israel’s God and about 300 years later Antiokus 4. Epiphanes (175-164 BC) decided that everyone in his Syrian kingdom should worship Zevs and no other god. It is strange that poetry should result in so much dictatorship and pain, there is still a lot of it in this world. Jews were persecuted and got a hard time revolting against it. This was prophesied 3-400 years earlier (Daniel.11 Zechariah 11).
But Israel’s God was not like this. The ten commandments told them what they should not do, only two of them told them what they should do, they should honor God for what he had done by keeping the sabbath holy an honor their parents for what they were for them and had done for them.
What should they do then? They should believe in God, turn to him and listen to him. And so they should cultivate their land so that it became fruitful to them.
A world government, but with what kind of policy?
Einstein separated science from politics, social affairs and religion. He said he did not believe in a personal God, even though he said he wanted to know God’s thoughts.
After second world war Einstein wanted a world government, but what kind of policy should it have? UN was formed and nowadays there appears to be a lot of interest in defining a global policy to it, where the climate policy is central. But it seems to bring more trouble to Israel and the Jews. So this was surely not what Einstein looked forward to.
Unsubscribing. Please let me explain. TH-cam recommendations are broken and I can't get videos from your channel off my list even though I've watched them and manually removed them. It's an unacceptable situation with all this repeated content recommended every single day. Billions and billions of videos and they can't recommend anything I haven't already seen. The only thing I've found is to unsubscribe and click "do not recommend channel". It's unfortunate you have to lose subscribers but hopefully content creators can get TH-cam to add a little fuzziness to their recommendations and actually recommend new content. Sorry to leave. Bye.
I don't understand the part with annihilation of 3 000 00 000 parts of antimatter with 3 000 000 001 parts of matter. In the end our universe would be composed of matter that survived this annihilation. So far so good. But then what I'd expect is that the energy make-up (37:47) would say that stars + gas + neutrinos + energy left over from initial annihilation (in the form of microwave background or whatever) is 5%. Or how exactly does the annihilation energy fit into the chart?
Effectively, the same problematic related to understanding natural forces, structure of our universe, motions and interactions among elementary and other particles is part of generalized “matter-waves and wave-particle duality theory”. See much more here (download PDF book):
mastersonics.com/documents/revision_of_the_particle-wave_dualism.pdf
Jesus paid for us with his blood, to free us from slavery.
Prophet Zechariah prophesied about the incompetent shepherd that pastured the flock marked for slaughter, those who sold them became rich from it and even praised the Lord for it (Zechariah11 & Daniel 11). The Lord was sold for 30 pieces of silver, so it happened when Jesus was killed. Then someone should take again the equipment of a foolish shepherd. That became apparent in the indulgence trade. So the prophesy stretches over many century, even up to our time.
In the Bible the gods made of sticks and stone are called the Lie. Contrary to that Jesus is the truth that frees us form the slavery under sin and the false gods. When he died on the cross, he paid the price for us, to by us back to God, so that we shall belong to him. By faith in Christ we get the Holy Spirit of mere grace, without doing anything for it. It is like a seal that shows that we belong to him and it is the pant of our heritage.
2 electrons repel eachother, what is the repellingness constructed of? and what is the mechanism that imparts the motive force? same question for gravity, there is a communication between the ground and the object,what is the communication made of and How does it make the object move to the ground? I get the idea that einstien says the space under the object 'shrinks', is that the best answer science has for how stuff falls down? Higgs field sounds like we are back to the aether. what is space, if it is not simply the 'gap' between stuff.Hubbard says 'space is a viewpoint of dimension'... interesting but still does not describe the mechanism by which stuff falls down.Tesla considered the aether was real and it could be made to emit 'radient energy' at any location. The idea the aether can be stressed to produce radient energy which condenses to form electrons in metals, fascinating stuff, thank you!
Does God throw dices?
Einstein wouldn’t quite accept quantum mechanics and put it this way, that God does not throw dices. Stephan Hawking answered in one of his books that he is a big gambler. And I think he was right. The six days of creation went like this, God said his Word and it happened. Then he saw it was good. Of course these “days” are long periods of time. God created everything with his Word, so he already has a theory of everything. But he also looked after it, why? Surely because there is a matter of chance in it, even for him. He is good and he looked after that it became good.
In quantum mechanics we realized that the matter of chance is fundamental in mass, particles and space. Any elementary particle has random motion, so we become concerned about position and momentum and I see it this way, that it is fundamental for life also. God has mercy with what he has created and let it have it’s random choice. It must have it to exist, this becomes apparent in life, it has the property that it moves, at least as it grows.
Dr Don I can hear after presidential debate
God does his work with us with his Spirit and his Word, he builds us up inside and build us like living stones to become a temple for him in the Spirit. Building means order, so we experience that God creates order.
We got the Holy Spirit by faith in Christ, of mere grace, and it does wonders among us. It reveals Jesus for us, so we get to know him and the power of his resurrection in our life, we get to know the power of the coming world (Phil.3,10 Heb.6,5). So we experience at least a “two world theory”.
God saves us and creates us “in Christ”, that’s to say just because he died for us and rose from the dead and is alive. So we experience God’s creative power and saving power in our lives.
We experience that God creates order, so this does not come as a result of more total disorder in the universe according to the second law of thermodynamics, that comes naturally in addition to this. God is one and it may sound like his power of creation is the same as his power of salvation, he creates something that lasts for ever, so it will not fall apart according to the entropy law. That’s the point with the salvation.
So we can say that the power of God is the most fundamental force, since he is one, his power is one. Yes, God created everything with his Word, so he already has a theory of everything and we experience it.
Max Planck "I regard Consciousness as fundamental and Matter being derived from Consciousness"
In the "particle wave theory" the moment it is not a particle, it can only be a "conscious" wave! The Infinite Consciousness, experiencing the Infinite possibilities, Infinitely. We are that consciousness experiencing our infinite possibilities in our finite space and time. All possibilities means experiencing the "good, bad, and indifference.
Excellent explanation of TOE in context to QM and GR , QED , dark matter and dark energy , space time , forces and the laws of nature with unknown and unexplained cosmic mysteries and the God particle , hypothesis of God's thought and antimatter and anti-gravity and antiparticle mystery .