In total Hamiltonian, T_n (kinetic energy of nucleus) is neglected b/c BO approx considers the nucleus to be at rest but why V_nn (nucleus- nucleus repulsion potential energy ) is it also neglected in Hamiltonian?
I think that because V_nn is positive wich indicates positive total energy in little distance between nucleus, which not stable. However the V_ne with negative sign make it stable automatically. For V_ee, with negative totale energy in little distance, which stable.
Omgg thank you so much i completely understand it now. You are a good teacher ❤
Happy to help!
Thank you so much for this video, you explained it in very simpler way that is easy to understand ....thank you again... You are such a good teacher😊😊
@@AnshuKumari-xr6fl Welcome
Very nice and simplified explanation.
Glad you liked it
In total Hamiltonian, T_n (kinetic energy of nucleus) is neglected b/c BO approx considers the nucleus to be at rest but why V_nn (nucleus- nucleus repulsion potential energy ) is it also neglected in Hamiltonian?
I think that because V_nn is positive wich indicates positive total energy in little distance between nucleus, which not stable. However the V_ne with negative sign make it stable automatically. For V_ee, with negative totale energy in little distance, which stable.
"Mohsin Cyanide" what type of bond is that ionic or coolant? M-CN?
Ionic bond is present between Metal and carbon
@@MohsinCyanide I mean what type of bond your name contains? since you've cyanide surname
😂😂😂
@@Rudrakxh 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
PLZ make video on kohn sham equa
Will make within aa few days
👍👍