📌 FIND ONE HERE: bit.ly/3rBZT4x • bit.ly/3RLCIPT 🔓 Missed something? OPEN the description box ABOVE. You'll find it! 🆘 Hit THANKS☝to highlight your Question + give thanks for the help you receive! ☝ NO Links, Self Promotion, or Personal Info. Please stay on topic and be respectful.
Hi Andrew - if I put my Onkyo RZ-50 in pure direct mode, would I not have a ton of more functionality for $1200.00 vs an $1800.00 strictly 2.1 amp with nowhere near the functionality? What are yours and Kristie's thoughts?
@@Audiomainia2310 Well, if you require 5.1 Home Theater, the Onkyo makes more sense. I don't know about "more functionality". For stereo music alone, the 1000A does as much and with better (and more stable) power and fidelity than the Onkyo. The Onkyo cannot handle 4 ohm loads and lower with grace. This more or less comes down to the use of a very beefy 2 channel class A/B power supply vs. a switching class D that is asked to handle 11(!) channels.
It’s dumb to think y’all are a ‘lone wolf’ because this is an amazing community. Thankful for your commitment to all your viewers. This channel is my only ‘must watch’ audio channel.
@@chrisveltman1795 Hmm, interesting. Appreciate you letting me know. FWIW, Kristi and I don't shy away from communication and/or collaboration, it's just that we're either a) never asked or b) have been other creators' punching bag for years which makes it hard to want to participate in a back-n-forth. We love this community though --especially you all here in the comments! I'm very proud of what we've built together!
they didn’t mention y’all by name. They just were celebrating their recent subscriber Memberships. And then stating that Darko didn’t want to increase his subscriber numbers. Because no one wants to be the Lone wolf.
Thank you, Andrew and Kristi for this timely video! I really wish more stereo receivers or integrated amps would come with HDMI given the convenience for movies & TV. At the end of the day, I just want a nicely constructed piece of HiFi equipment that is pleasant to look at and listen to, while being able to pull double duty for our entertainment room.
@@LeezahB I don't make a direct comparison to the 40N in either video, but it is comparable and a good option that would totally round out my TOP 3. Don't give your 40N a second look, it's good and you bought a great product!
I’m a bit late today, but I’ve got thoughts lol: 1) HDMI today is a must in any integrated amplifier for me. Those who think you need everything separately, then go separates? Integrated should be fully capable of doing whatever you want from it aside from making you dinner. HDMI is a must. 2) I think audiophiles (not all of them, but a lot of them) have been holding this hobby hostage, with their stubbornness and their inability to accept progress and change. That needs to stop and we’re seeing more and more brands realizing it and starting to go out there like this Yamaha. 3) I’m absolutely going to choose a cheaper integrated from the same brand if it’s performance sonically is 90% of the top dog yet the price is 50-60%. That’s awesome, we need to see more products like this and especially with tons of features built in. 4) Awesome review as usual! I think this piece of gear is an absolute steal. Especially when you compare it to Rotel S14 and that price… Hope everyone is having a lovely Sunday!
I think you're starting to see a real choice being offered to the consumer now. Like the Yamaha, the new Marantz Stereo 70s (2.1) vs the Marantz Cinema 70s (7.1) - single HMDI and high(er) output vs multiple HDMI with more speaker outputs (with a sacrifice in power and ultimate audio quality?)|| Each group can now optimise for their own preferences. It would be interesting to understand the compromises / advantages of these choices in more detail.
Great review. I won't consider any new device that doesn't support HDMI ARC these days. I'm slightly disappointed that Yamaha continues to not support Chromecast built-in in many of their devices. Luckily, as you mention, the MusicCast app is quite good and includes most music streaming services. Question! In your opinion, does the R-N1000a sound greatly better than the Yamaha's Aventage (AVR) line around this price range (A4A, A6A)? For me personally, if the sound quality isn't a huge improvement, frugal me could regret getting this receiver over the additional diversity/flexibility of features offered by the Aventage line.
Your talk about HDMI being digital reminds me of reading people bashing optical in favor of digital coax back in the day. I suspect this was driven by cable companies trying to push ridiculously expensive digital cables. Audiophiles are weird. I’m glad there’s a bigger push for measurement data in recent years. Anyway. Love your channel. I’m not at all in the market for this product but watch anyway.
Good afternoon friends! I watched a few hours ago, but had to run out right after. This was a fun video, and very well done. Is it odd that the biggest draw to me is the variable loudness setting? I always enjoyed the option on my vintage receivers that I started out with. I hope you have a great one!
I definitely need HDMI. I want to build a stereo system that can be used for 2-channel music as well as TV. I originally was thinking of getting the 7000A, but after seeing this review, the Yamaha is now my top pick for an integrated amplifier for this use case
I love my AS301 stereo amp with digital connections, combined with the Yamaha CD network player combo from some years ago. I am very keen on upgrading, mostly because the 301 is sligthly underpowered, but very neutral. I am totally in love with the RN2000A, however the 1000A is so much more affordable. I guess the multiroom/multicast is also a big bonus. Not sure on importance on HDMI (most TVs have digital out?) so even the RN800A might even be a good alternative. I am so happy Yamaha get the attention it so deserves at the moment in Hifi/audiofile land :-)
@Andrew Robinson If you could choose between a used Marantz model n40 for around the same price as a new Yamaha R-N1000a which one would you pick? Another great review by the way. This is in my opinion the best channel around hifi. Keep up the good work. Greetings from Belgium
Also for Dirac, it was a real gift from the universe (and the Swedish DSP algorithm wizards). As a person who's room has 2 huge almost +10dB peaks between 40 and 60hz (with a +5db "dip" between them) and then several +3-5dB peaks (and small dips) in the 100-200hz area, the implementation of Dirac took my 2.1 systems (connected to my TV with an HDMI 😉) sound to a whole different level. Even my mother would notice such a vast difference.
After upgrading to an audiphoæe product with HDMI eArc Everyone on the household enjoy the sound and usability of the primary sound system. HDMI eARHc is such a gamechanger. Add tidal/Spotify connect and Chromecast you are in heaven.
I am told the N800A is close the the 1000A regarding the sound. I dont need the HDMI so i dont know if you got a chance to look at it or got any feedback. thanks
Yamaha has always been my go to recievers. Don't laugh, but my current Yamaha is a RS 202, with blutooth and RCA inputs. I have a older node 2i as a streamer, and some Klipsch R51M speakers. Running a optical out from the TV to the node, and both my mac mini M1 ( with a Apple headphone dongle as my dac), and my PC using RCA's. I still listen to CD's with a NAD 542. I have a Monoprice flat 10" sub. This all old school hookups, the sub with speaker level hookup as well. The set up sounds fantastic! I really don't see a need to upgrade. The one thing about Yamaha recievers, amps is that they just last. Living in socal without A/C I don't worry aboot them overheating etc. as far as sorround I left that station years ago. I just enjoy a simple 2.1 setup.
Looking forward to the comparison to the Technics in the future. Though I do wonder how the predicted bankruptcy of Panasonic is going to affect Technics as a company. Or if it even will happen at all. They seem to be on a roll with their lineup! And this Yamaha looks great too. It's a great time for audiophiles. This or the Technics with a pair of Lintons is classic style with modern features.
Lured by the price I was about to buy this Yamaha amp. But then I had a listen of few demoes of this amp and I decided to buy Marantz 40n instead. Yamaha did sounds did not sound well to my ear. That does not mean it is not good for you, give it a listen before buying.
AFAIK, the Yamaha network receivers do not support gapless playback. They also do not support scrubbing within a song. I have these issues on my 2000A and Yamaha verified it in a support request. It's fixable with either a firmware or MusicCast (or both), but Yamaha has not done so for 10+ years. WiiM fixed their gapless issue in weeks after a Darko video mentionioned it. If WiiM can do it, Yamaha with their billions in revenue certainly can - and may do so, so it's not hopeless. Also, it must be known that Yamaha chose to use Bluetooth 4.2 when BT 5.x has been available for years. Maybe it doesn't matter, but hey...
Impressive product... I was surprised by Kristi's impression. The Yamaha N1000A has a lot in common with the A-S801 integrated amp. Kristi was not as enthusiastic with that. The N1000A does offer pre-amp outputs and apparently discards the subwoofer filter. Those are improvements! YPAO and HDMI offer benefits, but not for this two channel guy. FWIW we use a basic A-S301 that replaced Adcom separates when the GTP-500 refused to be repaired. The A-S301 cost less than the attempted repairs for the Adcom. Lesson learned... Paul H. in Huntington Beach, CA
In my case, using Dali Zensor 7 and REL T/7i, ypao did an amazing job. I feel like I have different speakers now. Amazing mid-range, which I didn't have earlier.
Big question I have - how does this compare to the similarly priced RX A4A? In the past you were a big proponent of AVRs for stereo/music with room correction being a main factor, and now there is the hybrid solution within the same price range (rn2000a being a lot more expensive). So should those of us considering 2(.1) setups for streaming and television who’d like some room correction still consider the RXA4A, or go straight for the rn1000a? And would that, in terms of quality (not just “waste of input space”), be a better choice? Or do AVRs, besides expandability, still have aces up their sleeves?
I’m a Yamaha fan boy, but Yamaha R-N1000 & R-N2000 are hard passes for me. I have an older Yamaha R-S700 Receiver I use in my garage and it seems as if Yamaha uses the same amp section in this as they did in my R-S700, the R-S700 specs actually show slightly less distortion in my R-S700. This is the same as the R-S & A-S700 and beyond. Save money, buy a dac if needed HDMI? It’s not important in two channel stereo, it just isn’t. The R-N2000 is basically an A-S1200 with a radio and dac built in, not worth the extra money. I also have the A-S1200 and the decades older more powerful CA-2010. As I said, I’m a Yamaha guy but just don’t see the value an extra 1K buys you here.
@@driver9337I’m really happy with the A-S1200. The dac I use? I have different dacs I move around. The range from Schiit Modi & Bitfrost, Cambridge dac magic 200M. Not a huge user of dacs or streamed music. Technology advances so fast I view all in one units like the R-N 2000/R-N1000 wasted cash. I have a 1978/1979 Yamaha CA-2010, the A-S1200 was bought to give the old amp a bit of a break. The A-S1200 sounds an awful lot like my cherished CA-2010. If I’m Honest, the CA-2010 120 wpc does get louder, does hit a bit harder in the bass department but the only way I can really push either amp is with hearing protection. At DB levels up to 105db or less I can’t tell them apart. To me the higher end Yamaha’s have an almost tube like leaning presentation. As far as the R-N1000? For me that would be a hard pass because of the money they want and the amp section isn’t any different from my R-S700 or the A-S700/701/801. Don’t get me wrong, it sounds decent enough but they sure aren’t on the same level as the A-S1200 which just sounds to my ears better. The A-S1200, uses mosfets, weighs double and draws far more current from the wall. That current translates into deeper, better controlled base. My R-S700 needs a sub, my CA-2010 & A-S1200 don’t. The higher end Yamaha also sound really good to me at lower volumes too. The R-S700 which is the Same amp section has to be pushed a little to get decent sound to my ears. Best advice? Demo them yourself in person
@robinsonbrand Will do. BTW: What's up with manufacturers referring to components like these as "amplifiers", even though they clearly incorporate tuner sections (usually FM-only, which is totally cool by me)? Is the term "receiver" now considered too A/V plebian?
R-N800A don't have HDMI eArc, R-N1000A have double bottom chassis, metal feet and minor changes to some components. I have R-N800A and it's great for the mony, if u don't want the hdmi
Thank you for the great review! With so many options available, it's becoming pretty difficult to choose. How does the Yamaha R-N1000 compare to the Marantz 40n?
Thanks for the review as always! interestingly the Audiolab 9000A can be had for the same price as the N1000a here in Sweden. The 7000a is almost 40% less expensive.... and the 6000a is over 60% cheaper But the Yamaha seems to be a good overall package but listening to what you are saying it feel like the Audiolab signature is the one for me at least
Thanks for this review Andrew! Just at this moment looking for a 2-channel with HDMI so looking forward to your review on the Marantz Stereo 70S! There is also the Onkyo 8270! Like to see a double feature on these maybe? Great channel!!
Depends what you like. The Lintons (I own a pair which are connected to a 2000A) are *relatively* warm sounding. If the 1000A is a "bit bright*, then the Linton''s slight warm character would be neutralized. IMO, it would be a good match. If you are over 50 (our hearing degrades over time), I wouldn't hesitate.
Thank you for this super great review. This channel is my favourite channel to go to and listen to. What I am now interested in, is how it will compare sound wise to the new Marantz stereo 70S. As I am in the market for a new receiver this Christmas and I think it will come to these two.
I think if you are going to have optical and digital coax, then HDMI should also be included. 10 years ago I was very naive to the entire DAC drama (and in some ways it was a better world) However, I also applaud Yamaha for building some very analog integrated amps and hope they don't drop that line. I have a 5.1 system for the TV and I like an analog 2 channel music system where I supply the streamer and DAC for music. Some of this isn't from the analog purist mindset, I get burned out on buying an expensive do everything integrated just to want eARC a few years later and... Then needing to buy a new integrated. When the power and sound of the old amp is still very nice. A modular design is also nice if a component is obsolete or fails, I can get another DAC, another streamer. I applaud NAD for modular design in the aspect of planning for new inputs. I don't swap out systems often and I despise planned obsoletion.
I bought the R-N2000A based on your previous review and love it. It is hooked up with B&W 705 s2 and SVS 3000 sub. Yup it’s a sweet sound. But now Kef R11 are in the future.
@@andrewrobinsonreviews Yeah, I'm not sure why someone would not like that. I would imagine because it signals home theater and there are some that don't like HT? I'm one of those audiophiles that has a hybrid 2-channel and HT system and would love to have HDMI on my preamp!
Well Yamaha is good and all. But I’m thinking about something smaller. Would u consider doing a review of miniDSP FLEX? It’s a give me that their room correction is good. What about their pre amp. The numbers look incredible. But do they sound good?
Hi thanks for a great review. If you had to choose between the yamaha rn1000a vs the as801 with a good streamer like the eversolo. What would be your choice?
I bought a Cambridge axr100 and i run a digital in from my tv with a 2.1 system including Kanto y6 passives and a 10" Monoprice sub, Another digital comes from my 4k blu-ray player for movies, And I have hdmi put from the tv to a Polk 400 atmos soundbar. I can plat both the 2.1 and the soundbar at the same time and it sounds fantastic for my needs in movies and when i listen to music i just go back to 2.1. I may buy tower speakers at some point, but im not sure if i really need them anymore!
Great review, A&K! Wondering how it compares to the Marantz 40n? I imagine the Marantz is the warmer sounding of the 2. Love the bass/treble/variable loudness controls and the fact that although this looks like an integrated amp, it’s actually a receiver. For about 1/2 the price of its bigger brother, it seems to be a no-brainer.
The 40N has a bit fuller "richer" sound with more of a low mid-bass hump or sensation of weight in comparison. Also the 40N lacks room correction but it's still a GREAT piece!
Guys you keep mentioning a comparison with 40N. As I can see 40N is much more expensive. Almost 1000€ in my country. Also Yamaha is more powerful. What’s to compare here? Yamaha at this price is a bargain I think.
So I have been watching your channel along with others for a while now. The plan - scrapping pretty much everything I have and starting over. This field is extremely daunting. Like you said...if you can plug in yulour TV.. Why not!! What advice do you give an old gear head like me? I'm still rocking the Puoneer Elite SC-05 with my Definitive Texlchnology Tower with subwoofers built in. I love my movies, my vinyl, and yes my CD's! What advice do you give someone like ne where all the big audio stores are all gone..
I understand why you refer to NAD as sterile but I do find it a bit ironic. To me, sterile means that the speakers determine the sound of the system, no matter the speakers (as long as power needs are being met). So when you refer to the KEFs as neutral and taking on the sound characteristics of the amp, and referring to that positively, I don't quite understand why that characteristic on the amplifier side is worthy of dismissal. None of this is to say your preference is invalid, just your language around NAD products felt harsh here.
Any thoughts on the RX-A4A vs the R-N1000A? In the past, I've always gone with multi-channel receivers due to their versatility, but I find this to be an intriguing comparison, given the pretty similar specs for two channels driven. This review, particularly Kristi's take, is what has me seriously considering getting an R-N1000A.
Thank you for the great review Andrew! But here is a question: Is there any reason I should prefer RN1000A over the RX-A4A (it's an AV, but I'm just thinking of stereo configuration)? The first one retails for $1,799 and the latter for $1,299 (there is a discount currently, but even without it it's still cheaper), while it has output power of 110 watts per channel and Also gives you the flexibility to build your surround system if you wish. Are there any fundamental differences in these Amps that make the RN1000A better for music? I am no hi-fi specialist, so probably will not notice minor differences in the sound. And another question: did you have a chance to run PolkAudio R700 on one of these receivers/amps? How did that go? :) (was there enough power?)
I'm taking long look at the Yamaha amps (receivers) This 1000 is a good value. The "2000" looks cool but has high price. Then the purer "1200" & "2200" Integrated Amps -- also of interest. Right now I'm between this "1000" level (but no meters, sadly) but size easier to deal with - as well as price. Or maybe stretching to get a "2200" at the best price I can find (even if I have to wait for a "special") I have a Yamaha last 22 years -- the RX-777. It's a good Receiver, and better once broken-in for a year or two. (I expect these newer Yamahas will also benefit by a good long break-in period.)
I assume Yamaha doesn't kindly provide an extra review unit for comparison, but what a lot of people is wondering is what the real world use / sound quality difference is between the cheaper R-N800a and this one. What do you get for $500 and 1Kg more? (Yes, squinting at the back panel photos, the 800a has no HDMI, 2 coaxs (1000a has 1), and an AM antenna)
Has anyone compared this to the A-S1200? Is it similar sonically to it? If I have a node should I just get the 1200? Or get rid of the node and go with the RN1000A?
If you happen to hook the B&W bookshelves up, I would love to hear how it does. I have an older yamaha integrated from this line (303) and like it except that it struggles to drive my B&W bookshelves (CM5) as they are quite power hungry. Has Yamaha updated the musicast experience from 5 years ago? I find that it is a bit cumbersome compared to other streamers that I have played with. I do LOVE that it is part of the amp though. Thanks as always for a great review!
Hello from the Netherlands Amsterdam, great exploring yamaha 1000, I have a question I still got the 2010 yamaha amplifier it's have a Recap 4 years ago, and 4 x the yamaha 1000 m , here's a question,,is the rn a 1000 an upgrade or ???? What is your opinion I hope you answer 👍
hdmi input is fantastic to cover one scenario: optical disk player, with output hdmi-audio only; as there is one (reavon) that covers almost all scenarios, from CD/SACD, DVD-Audio, and maybe Bluray-Audio, it is even good to handle movie sound; and the power to move loudspeakers of 8ohms at 110-220w is an eye opener.
Two weeks ago i just bought rn 800a available in Europe (same specs like 1000A minus HDMI)amazing sound and i have all conection that i need. YPAO do great job with audio setup on my small living room(you can adjust all setings after from music cast) ,i am very happy with him..keep listening !
Thanks a lot for this great review, you're the best and thank you Kristi for convincing me i don't need the 2000a , mostly for us Canadians, i can't justify paying 700$ of taxes for that, 5500$ total...3000$more than it's little brother here... Even my 500$ Yamaha avr receiver is surprising after adjusting the equalizer manually. Thanks again and take care.
Listen here, y'all audiophiles with ears finer than frog hair, 'cause I'm about to serve up a sonic feast fit for kings. That Yamaha amplifier, she's the belle of the sound ball, decked out in all her high-fidelity finery. Imagine harmonic distortion so negligible, it's like findin' a needle in a haystack, and a soundstage wider than the Mississippi, presentin' each note with the grace and manners of Southern hospitality. This darlin' delivers frequencies smoother than a well-aged bourbon, from the lowest bass that'll rumble your guts, to highs clearer than a June day in Dixie. And mercy, the separation is like each instrument's got its own personal invitation to perform in your parlor. Equipped with a top-tier DAC and a phono input that'd make any vinyl purist swoon, this amplifier has the muscle to drive even the most persnickety speakers with the gusto of a gator in a bayou. So, fret no more, dear audiophiles, 'cause with the Yamaha, your hi-fi anxieties are as gone as last season's pecan pie, and you're in for audio bliss that's as satisfyin' as Mama's homemade biscuits!
Completely agree that the integration of HDMI is, and should be, a normal state for HiFi components at THE END OF 2023! I feel it's just such a missed opportunity when companies don't do it for some reason..
Your TH-cam is absolutely awesome and educational. Question: do you ever test jazz such as songs on TH-cam called greatest collection Whiskey Blues relaxing Whiskey Blues music?
was there a big difference when you tried the cambridge audio streamer, and has music cast finally added tidal connect? i used to own the rn803D but changed for cambridge audio cxa 81 with the magic dag200 and a wimmpro. but i still like the yamaha sound and the 2000n is out of reach for me. so thanks for this great review i think yours is the first, love what you guys are doing
The fact that it has Wifi and bluetooth is unfortunate. I specifically went with the 801 for my office as I can't have any devices with Wifi or Bluetooth there. Maybe niche but just have an ethernet jack and call it a day. Wire all the things...
It does have an Ethernet jack, and if it’s anything like my Yamaha home theater receiver, then you can probably turn off Bluetooth completely. Can even unscrew the antenna to further disable those signals.
Marantz just came out with the same type of amp called “the stereo 70” I bought it from Marantz about 6weeks ago. I don’t think Marantz has it out to the dealers yet. I have the Yamaha A-S 801 and like the amp a lot but no ARC or pre-outs. The new Marantz is awesome if you like that little warmer sound signature.
Wow! Finally a full-featured amp under 1000€ that's not a class D mini amp (Bluesound Edge). Marantz finally understood that most people just want HDMI eARC + Streaming + Sub Out in an amp. Everything else is gravy.
Yamaha has what I waited for. Tone Controls! Built in Phono pre amp! Meters! HDMI 🕺 I had held off on Audio Lab because I just couldn’t break from having tone controls. Now I can upgrade from my 80’s Yamaha Go figure. But what about the built in streamer? I use Apple music and Prime music through my TV to my receiver now. Is Music Cast as good as some stand alone streamers? Always enjoy your reviews. Clear and concise info always
The streamer is good and its implementation within the app was flawless for us. It doesn't support Apple Music natively, but you can Airplay/BT or use the HDMI and a TV/AppleTV as a work around.
This is interesting. My Onkyo TX-SR313 is long in the tooth and since going 2.1 for home theatre I've been looking for a 2.1 reciever I can use with my TV (and not break the bank). I think this is a good option for me, kinda bothers me to get a 7.1 or 9.1 AV reciever when only using 2.1. Thank you for pointing this one out.
Thanks for another wonderful review. Just curious at this price point with HDMI, what would be the sound comparison between this and the Onkyo TX-RZ50 driven in 2 channels? I understand...apples and oranges...but maybe closer to zebras and appaloosa.
There are some sonic similarities and if I knew I wanted to split my time (even if it was 70 music/ 30 home theater) I'd probably opt for the Onkyo just to have that added flexibility.
Andrew I took your advice 0n the rotel ra 1592mk and am very happy with it I wonder could you please do a review on the advance Paris a12 it would be great to hear your thoughts about it
At 40% more expensive than the Bluesound Powernode in Australia it’s a hard sell in my view. I purchased the Bluesound to replace my last Yamaha receiver that died after 20 months of use. The repairer told me that Yamaha is perfect for those wanting to update their gear regularly but they’re no longer built to last. Hopefully Bluesound products last longer. At least the Yamaha warranty support were excellent.
It all depends on your use case. For me the Powernode wouldn't even be on my radar due to its lack of connections. With only Hdmi, 2x optical an no analog inputs... it pales in comparison to the Phono stage, USB input and several line-in connections on the Yamaha has on top of that. The Powernode is an entirely different beast.
I am really torn between keeping the Audiolab 7000A or trying this Yamaha! Any thoughts from folks with experience? Paired with the Dali Opticon 6MK2's hybrid tweeter, high frequencies sound ever so clinical and digitally compared to what might be described as "Musical", smoother driven by Musical Fidelity (M5si) or Parasound (A23) I have tried. That said, I am blown away by the bass control and mid bass definition from the Audiolab and they have opened by eyes to a sound signature I adore! And so the search continues, fun! Any thoughts on how this Yammy might compare. I am also drawn to the idea of consolidating the streamer into this unit as well, and say good by to this amazing yet clunky Rose RS250 box.
The Alva TT has a built-in phono pre as well as BT transmission. I tested the MM compatibility with our AudioTechnica/Ortofon Black as well. Apologies if it wasn't clear that the TT also helped me to test the amp's Bluetooth and analog/line-in capabilities.
No worries, here's how it is explained in the manual "The phono jacks of this product are compatible with MM cartridges. Use a step-up transformer or the like when connecting a turntable (record player) equipped with a MC (low-output cartridge". @@andrewrobinsonreviews
Andrew, Kristi, good review and very high production quality. I own a Nuprime IDA8 integrated. Nuprime reviews are hard to find but all their amps, dacs, etc. I have listened to eo far were amazing. Any chance you consider the brand in the future? Keep up your hard work, it is greatly appreciated.
Thanks! I forgot to mention the subwoofer output is a an excellent addition. Most speakers you review that interest me would benefit from a sub woofer i.e. Q Acoustics 5040 and such. If I want a truer surround sound I think a sound bar like the Samsung Q 990 C will be a good compliment.
Thank you both so much for this review. I have now found my all in one solution to purchase this Yamaha 1000 to pair with my Klipsch rp 600m that I will receive tomorrow. P.S Love your channel and look forward to seeing more reviews. ❤
📌 FIND ONE HERE: bit.ly/3rBZT4x • bit.ly/3RLCIPT
🔓 Missed something? OPEN the description box ABOVE. You'll find it!
🆘 Hit THANKS☝to highlight your Question + give thanks for the help you receive!
☝ NO Links, Self Promotion, or Personal Info. Please stay on topic and be respectful.
Hi Andrew - if I put my Onkyo RZ-50 in pure direct mode, would I not have a ton of more functionality for $1200.00 vs an $1800.00 strictly 2.1 amp with nowhere near the functionality? What are yours and Kristie's thoughts?
@@Audiomainia2310 Well, if you require 5.1 Home Theater, the Onkyo makes more sense. I don't know about "more functionality". For stereo music alone, the 1000A does as much and with better (and more stable) power and fidelity than the Onkyo. The Onkyo cannot handle 4 ohm loads and lower with grace. This more or less comes down to the use of a very beefy 2 channel class A/B power supply vs. a switching class D that is asked to handle 11(!) channels.
It’s dumb to think y’all are a ‘lone wolf’ because this is an amazing community. Thankful for your commitment to all your viewers. This channel is my only ‘must watch’ audio channel.
Appreciate you (and everyone) but may I ask what prompted the "lone wolf" comment? Not upset, just curious!
The beginning of the recent CAM/Darko collab. An assumption on my part, but I don’t know who else theyd be talking about.
@@chrisveltman1795 Hmm, interesting. Appreciate you letting me know. FWIW, Kristi and I don't shy away from communication and/or collaboration, it's just that we're either a) never asked or b) have been other creators' punching bag for years which makes it hard to want to participate in a back-n-forth. We love this community though --especially you all here in the comments! I'm very proud of what we've built together!
they didn’t mention y’all by name. They just were celebrating their recent subscriber Memberships. And then stating that Darko didn’t want to increase his subscriber numbers. Because no one wants to be the Lone wolf.
@@chrisveltman1795 Well, so long as I have Kristi and all of you there ain't nothing "lone" about what we do here 😉
This review put me over the top, just ordered mine!!!
Thank you, Andrew and Kristi for this timely video! I really wish more stereo receivers or integrated amps would come with HDMI given the convenience for movies & TV. At the end of the day, I just want a nicely constructed piece of HiFi equipment that is pleasant to look at and listen to, while being able to pull double duty for our entertainment room.
HDMI is want I want!!! Definitely interested in this amp! Love the aesthetics
Love having options for integrated amps that have so much built in!
Me too! Be sure to stay tuned for part two next Sunday.
@@andrewrobinsonreviews❤
@@andrewrobinsonreviewswill you compare with the Marantz Model 40N?
@@LeezahB I don't make a direct comparison to the 40N in either video, but it is comparable and a good option that would totally round out my TOP 3. Don't give your 40N a second look, it's good and you bought a great product!
@@andrewrobinsonreviews thanks Andrew!!!🥰💖
I’m a bit late today, but I’ve got thoughts lol:
1) HDMI today is a must in any integrated amplifier for me. Those who think you need everything separately, then go separates? Integrated should be fully capable of doing whatever you want from it aside from making you dinner. HDMI is a must.
2) I think audiophiles (not all of them, but a lot of them) have been holding this hobby hostage, with their stubbornness and their inability to accept progress and change. That needs to stop and we’re seeing more and more brands realizing it and starting to go out there like this Yamaha.
3) I’m absolutely going to choose a cheaper integrated from the same brand if it’s performance sonically is 90% of the top dog yet the price is 50-60%. That’s awesome, we need to see more products like this and especially with tons of features built in.
4) Awesome review as usual! I think this piece of gear is an absolute steal. Especially when you compare it to Rotel S14 and that price…
Hope everyone is having a lovely Sunday!
I think you're starting to see a real choice being offered to the consumer now. Like the Yamaha, the new Marantz Stereo 70s (2.1) vs the Marantz Cinema 70s (7.1) - single HMDI and high(er) output vs multiple HDMI with more speaker outputs (with a sacrifice in power and ultimate audio quality?)||
Each group can now optimise for their own preferences.
It would be interesting to understand the compromises / advantages of these choices in more detail.
Guys, I just love your presentation! Clear, precise and to the point. Did I mention entertaining? I do like the fact that the Yamaha is a 2.1 system.
Thanks so much!
Great review. I won't consider any new device that doesn't support HDMI ARC these days. I'm slightly disappointed that Yamaha continues to not support Chromecast built-in in many of their devices. Luckily, as you mention, the MusicCast app is quite good and includes most music streaming services. Question! In your opinion, does the R-N1000a sound greatly better than the Yamaha's Aventage (AVR) line around this price range (A4A, A6A)? For me personally, if the sound quality isn't a huge improvement, frugal me could regret getting this receiver over the additional diversity/flexibility of features offered by the Aventage line.
I was thinking the same thing!
Good morning I enjoyed the video this morning. Hope you guys have an awesome week
Thanks so much! Same to you!
Your talk about HDMI being digital reminds me of reading people bashing optical in favor of digital coax back in the day. I suspect this was driven by cable companies trying to push ridiculously expensive digital cables.
Audiophiles are weird. I’m glad there’s a bigger push for measurement data in recent years.
Anyway. Love your channel. I’m not at all in the market for this product but watch anyway.
Good afternoon friends! I watched a few hours ago, but had to run out right after. This was a fun video, and very well done. Is it odd that the biggest draw to me is the variable loudness setting? I always enjoyed the option on my vintage receivers that I started out with. I hope you have a great one!
I definitely need HDMI. I want to build a stereo system that can be used for 2-channel music as well as TV. I originally was thinking of getting the 7000A, but after seeing this review, the Yamaha is now my top pick for an integrated amplifier for this use case
I love my AS301 stereo amp with digital connections, combined with the Yamaha CD network player combo from some years ago. I am very keen on upgrading, mostly because the 301 is sligthly underpowered, but very neutral. I am totally in love with the RN2000A, however the 1000A is so much more affordable. I guess the multiroom/multicast is also a big bonus. Not sure on importance on HDMI (most TVs have digital out?) so even the RN800A might even be a good alternative. I am so happy Yamaha get the attention it so deserves at the moment in Hifi/audiofile land :-)
@Andrew Robinson
If you could choose between a used Marantz model n40 for around the same price as a new Yamaha R-N1000a which one would you pick?
Another great review by the way. This is in my opinion the best channel around hifi. Keep up the good work.
Greetings from Belgium
The best is to audition both amps next to each other.
Alright! Happy sunday to ya once again!!!
Happy Sunday indeed, AND at the right time 😂
😄
Also for Dirac, it was a real gift from the universe (and the Swedish DSP algorithm wizards). As a person who's room has 2 huge almost +10dB peaks between 40 and 60hz (with a +5db "dip" between them) and then several +3-5dB peaks (and small dips) in the 100-200hz area, the implementation of Dirac took my 2.1 systems (connected to my TV with an HDMI 😉) sound to a whole different level. Even my mother would notice such a vast difference.
After upgrading to an audiphoæe product with HDMI eArc Everyone on the household enjoy the sound and usability of the primary sound system.
HDMI eARHc is such a gamechanger. Add tidal/Spotify connect and Chromecast you are in heaven.
Amazing product! Yamaha made an integrated that I had to build with separates.
I own one for a couple of months now. So far I really like it. But the plastic knobs are close to killing it for me. Once you know, you know. :)
Maybe a heavy duty nylon knob would be a good compromise solution ?
You can change the knobs ,I do it on mine .
Agree with the comment this is a must watch channel. The quality never fades.
Sincerely appreciate that!
I am told the N800A is close the the 1000A regarding the sound. I dont need the HDMI so i dont know if you got a chance to look at it or got any feedback. thanks
Yamaha has always been my go to recievers. Don't laugh, but my current Yamaha is a RS 202, with blutooth and RCA inputs. I have a older node 2i as a streamer, and some Klipsch R51M speakers. Running a optical out from the TV to the node, and both my mac mini M1 ( with a Apple headphone dongle as my dac), and my PC using RCA's. I still listen to CD's with a NAD 542. I have a Monoprice flat 10" sub. This all old school hookups, the sub with speaker level hookup as well. The set up sounds fantastic! I really don't see a need to upgrade. The one thing about Yamaha recievers, amps is that they just last. Living in socal without A/C I don't worry aboot them overheating etc. as far as sorround I left that station years ago. I just enjoy a simple 2.1 setup.
Looking forward to the comparison to the Technics in the future. Though I do wonder how the predicted bankruptcy of Panasonic is going to affect Technics as a company. Or if it even will happen at all. They seem to be on a roll with their lineup!
And this Yamaha looks great too. It's a great time for audiophiles.
This or the Technics with a pair of Lintons is classic style with modern features.
Lured by the price I was about to buy this Yamaha amp.
But then I had a listen of few demoes of this amp and I decided to buy Marantz 40n instead. Yamaha did sounds did not sound well to my ear. That does not mean it is not good for you, give it a listen before buying.
AFAIK, the Yamaha network receivers do not support gapless playback. They also do not support scrubbing within a song. I have these issues on my 2000A and Yamaha verified it in a support request. It's fixable with either a firmware or MusicCast (or both), but Yamaha has not done so for 10+ years. WiiM fixed their gapless issue in weeks after a Darko video mentionioned it. If WiiM can do it, Yamaha with their billions in revenue certainly can - and may do so, so it's not hopeless.
Also, it must be known that Yamaha chose to use Bluetooth 4.2 when BT 5.x has been available for years. Maybe it doesn't matter, but hey...
Impressive product... I was surprised by Kristi's impression. The Yamaha N1000A has a lot in common with the A-S801 integrated amp. Kristi was not as enthusiastic with that. The N1000A does offer pre-amp outputs and apparently discards the subwoofer filter. Those are improvements! YPAO and HDMI offer benefits, but not for this two channel guy. FWIW we use a basic A-S301 that replaced Adcom separates when the GTP-500 refused to be repaired. The A-S301 cost less than the attempted repairs for the Adcom. Lesson learned...
Paul H. in Huntington Beach, CA
In my case, using Dali Zensor 7 and REL T/7i, ypao did an amazing job. I feel like I have different speakers now. Amazing mid-range, which I didn't have earlier.
Big question I have - how does this compare to the similarly priced RX A4A? In the past you were a big proponent of AVRs for stereo/music with room correction being a main factor, and now there is the hybrid solution within the same price range (rn2000a being a lot more expensive). So should those of us considering 2(.1) setups for streaming and television who’d like some room correction still consider the RXA4A, or go straight for the rn1000a? And would that, in terms of quality (not just “waste of input space”), be a better choice? Or do AVRs, besides expandability, still have aces up their sleeves?
How does NAD C3050 compare to Yamaha 1000a?
This amp plus Decware OB’s seems intriguing for a less expensive set up.
I’m a Yamaha fan boy, but Yamaha R-N1000 & R-N2000 are hard passes for me. I have an older Yamaha R-S700 Receiver I use in my garage and it seems as if Yamaha uses the same amp section in this as they did in my R-S700, the R-S700 specs actually show slightly less distortion in my R-S700. This is the same as the R-S & A-S700 and beyond. Save money, buy a dac if needed HDMI? It’s not important in two channel stereo, it just isn’t. The R-N2000 is basically an A-S1200 with a radio and dac built in, not worth the extra money. I also have the A-S1200 and the decades older more powerful CA-2010. As I said, I’m a Yamaha guy but just don’t see the value an extra 1K buys you here.
I'm trying to decide between the A-S1200 and this R-N1000A. Are you satisfied with your A-S1200? What DAC do you use with it?
@@driver9337I’m really happy with the A-S1200. The dac I use? I have different dacs I move around. The range from Schiit Modi & Bitfrost, Cambridge dac magic 200M. Not a huge user of dacs or streamed music. Technology advances so fast I view all in one units like the R-N 2000/R-N1000 wasted cash. I have a 1978/1979 Yamaha CA-2010, the A-S1200 was bought to give the old amp a bit of a break. The A-S1200 sounds an awful lot like my cherished CA-2010. If I’m Honest, the CA-2010 120 wpc does get louder, does hit a bit harder in the bass department but the only way I can really push either amp is with hearing protection. At DB levels up to 105db or less I can’t tell them apart. To me the higher end Yamaha’s have an almost tube like leaning presentation. As far as the R-N1000? For me that would be a hard pass because of the money they want and the amp section isn’t any different from my R-S700 or the A-S700/701/801. Don’t get me wrong, it sounds decent enough but they sure aren’t on the same level as the A-S1200 which just sounds to my ears better. The A-S1200, uses mosfets, weighs double and draws far more current from the wall. That current translates into deeper, better controlled base. My R-S700 needs a sub, my CA-2010 & A-S1200 don’t. The higher end Yamaha also sound really good to me at lower volumes too. The R-S700 which is the Same amp section has to be pushed a little to get decent sound to my ears. Best advice? Demo them yourself in person
Damn, you're killing me with that Technics SU-GX70 tease!
Right? THAT looks a bit too delectable to ignore now.
Stay very tuned...
@robinsonbrand Will do. BTW: What's up with manufacturers referring to components like these as "amplifiers", even though they clearly incorporate tuner sections (usually FM-only, which is totally cool by me)? Is the term "receiver" now considered too A/V plebian?
the less expensive R-N800A has the same Sabre ES9080Q DAC and is also 100 w 20-20khz. do you know what the differences would be?
R-N800A don't have HDMI eArc, R-N1000A have double bottom chassis, metal feet and minor changes to some components.
I have R-N800A and it's great for the mony, if u don't want the hdmi
thank you@@milad.m2130
Thank you for the great review! With so many options available, it's becoming pretty difficult to choose. How does the Yamaha R-N1000 compare to the Marantz 40n?
Thanks for the review as always!
interestingly the Audiolab 9000A can be had for the same price as the N1000a here in Sweden. The 7000a is almost 40% less expensive.... and the 6000a is over 60% cheaper
But the Yamaha seems to be a good overall package but listening to what you are saying it feel like the Audiolab signature is the one for me at least
Thanks for this review Andrew! Just at this moment looking for a 2-channel with HDMI so looking forward to your review on the Marantz Stereo 70S! There is also the Onkyo 8270! Like to see a double feature on these maybe? Great channel!!
Wonder how this would pair with the Wharfedale Lintons…?
Same here
Depends what you like. The Lintons (I own a pair which are connected to a 2000A) are *relatively* warm sounding. If the 1000A is a "bit bright*, then the Linton''s slight warm character would be neutralized. IMO, it would be a good match. If you are over 50 (our hearing degrades over time), I wouldn't hesitate.
@@billd9667Thank you for your reply 😊
Thank you for this super great review. This channel is my favourite channel to go to and listen to. What I am now interested in, is how it will compare sound wise to the new Marantz stereo 70S. As I am in the market for a new receiver this Christmas and I think it will come to these two.
I think if you are going to have optical and digital coax, then HDMI should also be included. 10 years ago I was very naive to the entire DAC drama (and in some ways it was a better world)
However, I also applaud Yamaha for building some very analog integrated amps and hope they don't drop that line. I have a 5.1 system for the TV and I like an analog 2 channel music system where I supply the streamer and DAC for music.
Some of this isn't from the analog purist mindset, I get burned out on buying an expensive do everything integrated just to want eARC a few years later and... Then needing to buy a new integrated. When the power and sound of the old amp is still very nice. A modular design is also nice if a component is obsolete or fails, I can get another DAC, another streamer. I applaud NAD for modular design in the aspect of planning for new inputs. I don't swap out systems often and I despise planned obsoletion.
You don't want HDMI? Fine, don't use it then. This has everything I want. I really want to try this amp.
Pre Amp outputs are non negotiable. Nice to see them.
Very nice!
I bought the R-N2000A based on your previous review and love it. It is hooked up with B&W 705 s2 and SVS 3000 sub. Yup it’s a sweet sound. But now Kef R11 are in the future.
Admittedly diehard audiophile here, I think having HDMI integration is fantastic! Wish I had it. All for it, 100%.
Well hello, stranger!
It's not the evil connection I think a lot of people think it is, or that it was many, many years ago. Appreciate you sharing your thoughts.
@@KristiWright Hi there, Kristi! I am always here, never miss a video!!!
@@andrewrobinsonreviews Yeah, I'm not sure why someone would not like that. I would imagine because it signals home theater and there are some that don't like HT? I'm one of those audiophiles that has a hybrid 2-channel and HT system and would love to have HDMI on my preamp!
@@reestyfarts the HDMI on the XD3-A has major bugs and I don't recommend you use it.
Great review. Yamaha ..love their amps❤
Well Yamaha is good and all. But I’m thinking about something smaller. Would u consider doing a review of miniDSP FLEX? It’s a give me that their room correction is good. What about their pre amp. The numbers look incredible. But do they sound good?
Cyrus are half width & sound really good to me. However even here in UK are not cheap 🎶
Hi thanks for a great review. If you had to choose between the yamaha rn1000a vs the as801 with a good streamer like the eversolo. What would be your choice?
There are many things to like in your reviews but I appreciate your willingness to compare products/brands definitively. Thanks.
Thanks!
@andrewrobinsonreviews, M1 or the Yamaha RN1000?
@@stefanradu8640 @andrewrobinsonreviews…. I’d also love to know this
Me to!
I bought a Cambridge axr100 and i run a digital in from my tv with a 2.1 system including Kanto y6 passives and a 10" Monoprice sub, Another digital comes from my 4k blu-ray player for movies, And I have hdmi put from the tv to a Polk 400 atmos soundbar. I can plat both the 2.1 and the soundbar at the same time and it sounds fantastic for my needs in movies and when i listen to music i just go back to 2.1. I may buy tower speakers at some point, but im not sure if i really need them anymore!
Love Yamaha products
They're always pretty solid!
Out of curiosity how do these stereo amps compare to receivers like the cinema 40 or others in that price range etc for stereo?
Great review, A&K! Wondering how it compares to the Marantz 40n? I imagine the Marantz is the warmer sounding of the 2. Love the bass/treble/variable loudness controls and the fact that although this looks like an integrated amp, it’s actually a receiver. For about 1/2 the price of its bigger brother, it seems to be a no-brainer.
The 40N has a bit fuller "richer" sound with more of a low mid-bass hump or sensation of weight in comparison. Also the 40N lacks room correction but it's still a GREAT piece!
Guys you keep mentioning a comparison with 40N. As I can see 40N is much more expensive. Almost 1000€ in my country. Also Yamaha is more powerful. What’s to compare here? Yamaha at this price is a bargain I think.
So I have been watching your channel along with others for a while now. The plan - scrapping pretty much everything I have and starting over. This field is extremely daunting. Like you said...if you can plug in yulour TV.. Why not!! What advice do you give an old gear head like me? I'm still rocking the Puoneer Elite SC-05 with my Definitive Texlchnology Tower with subwoofers built in. I love my movies, my vinyl, and yes my CD's! What advice do you give someone like ne where all the big audio stores are all gone..
I understand why you refer to NAD as sterile but I do find it a bit ironic. To me, sterile means that the speakers determine the sound of the system, no matter the speakers (as long as power needs are being met). So when you refer to the KEFs as neutral and taking on the sound characteristics of the amp, and referring to that positively, I don't quite understand why that characteristic on the amplifier side is worthy of dismissal.
None of this is to say your preference is invalid, just your language around NAD products felt harsh here.
I love Yamaha. I would like to see y'all review the more budget av Yamaha receiver rx-385.
Any thoughts on the RX-A4A vs the R-N1000A? In the past, I've always gone with multi-channel receivers due to their versatility, but I find this to be an intriguing comparison, given the pretty similar specs for two channels driven. This review, particularly Kristi's take, is what has me seriously considering getting an R-N1000A.
Thank you for the great review Andrew! But here is a question: Is there any reason I should prefer RN1000A over the RX-A4A (it's an AV, but I'm just thinking of stereo configuration)? The first one retails for $1,799 and the latter for $1,299 (there is a discount currently, but even without it it's still cheaper), while it has output power of 110 watts per channel and Also gives you the flexibility to build your surround system if you wish. Are there any fundamental differences in these Amps that make the RN1000A better for music? I am no hi-fi specialist, so probably will not notice minor differences in the sound. And another question: did you have a chance to run PolkAudio R700 on one of these receivers/amps? How did that go? :) (was there enough power?)
I'm taking long look at the Yamaha amps (receivers) This 1000 is a good value. The "2000" looks cool but has high price. Then the purer "1200" & "2200" Integrated Amps -- also of interest. Right now I'm between this "1000" level (but no meters, sadly) but size easier to deal with - as well as price. Or maybe stretching to get a "2200" at the best price I can find (even if I have to wait for a "special")
I have a Yamaha last 22 years -- the RX-777. It's a good Receiver, and better once broken-in for a year or two.
(I expect these newer Yamahas will also benefit by a good long break-in period.)
I have my Yamaha n2000a used as preamp to the Yamaha 3200 and I love it! More than my Luxman! Can't go wrong with Yamaha higher tier amps.
Nice Video! is there any way you get the new Marantz Stereo 70 for a review?
We have it and that review is in the works.
I assume Yamaha doesn't kindly provide an extra review unit for comparison, but what a lot of people is wondering is what the real world use / sound quality difference is between the cheaper R-N800a and this one. What do you get for $500 and 1Kg more? (Yes, squinting at the back panel photos, the 800a has no HDMI, 2 coaxs (1000a has 1), and an AM antenna)
Had the exact same question 😅
Thanks! HDMI rules in so many ways.
Great video as usual... I have a quick question? Where did you get those nice black leather, silver chairs?
Those chairs are tagged in the video. You should see a photo pop up. You can also open the description box to find them.
Has anyone compared this to the A-S1200? Is it similar sonically to it? If I have a node should I just get the 1200? Or get rid of the node and go with the RN1000A?
If you happen to hook the B&W bookshelves up, I would love to hear how it does. I have an older yamaha integrated from this line (303) and like it except that it struggles to drive my B&W bookshelves (CM5) as they are quite power hungry. Has Yamaha updated the musicast experience from 5 years ago? I find that it is a bit cumbersome compared to other streamers that I have played with. I do LOVE that it is part of the amp though. Thanks as always for a great review!
Hello from the Netherlands Amsterdam, great exploring yamaha 1000, I have a question I still got the 2010 yamaha amplifier it's have a Recap 4 years ago, and 4 x the yamaha 1000 m , here's a question,,is the rn a 1000 an upgrade or ???? What is your opinion I hope you answer 👍
hdmi input is fantastic to cover one scenario: optical disk player, with output hdmi-audio only; as there is one (reavon) that covers almost all scenarios, from CD/SACD, DVD-Audio, and maybe Bluray-Audio, it is even good to handle movie sound; and the power to move loudspeakers of 8ohms at 110-220w is an eye opener.
Two weeks ago i just bought rn 800a available in Europe (same specs like 1000A minus HDMI)amazing sound and i have all conection that i need.
YPAO do great job with audio setup on my small living room(you can adjust all setings after from music cast) ,i am very happy with him..keep listening !
Thanks a lot for this great review, you're the best and thank you Kristi for convincing me i don't need the 2000a , mostly for us Canadians, i can't justify paying 700$ of taxes for that, 5500$ total...3000$more than it's little brother here...
Even my 500$ Yamaha avr receiver is surprising after adjusting the equalizer manually.
Thanks again and take care.
Glad we could help give you a bit more peace of mind.
Listen here, y'all audiophiles with ears finer than frog hair, 'cause I'm about to serve up a sonic feast fit for kings. That Yamaha amplifier, she's the belle of the sound ball, decked out in all her high-fidelity finery. Imagine harmonic distortion so negligible, it's like findin' a needle in a haystack, and a soundstage wider than the Mississippi, presentin' each note with the grace and manners of Southern hospitality. This darlin' delivers frequencies smoother than a well-aged bourbon, from the lowest bass that'll rumble your guts, to highs clearer than a June day in Dixie. And mercy, the separation is like each instrument's got its own personal invitation to perform in your parlor. Equipped with a top-tier DAC and a phono input that'd make any vinyl purist swoon, this amplifier has the muscle to drive even the most persnickety speakers with the gusto of a gator in a bayou. So, fret no more, dear audiophiles, 'cause with the Yamaha, your hi-fi anxieties are as gone as last season's pecan pie, and you're in for audio bliss that's as satisfyin' as Mama's homemade biscuits!
it sounds more 'downtown' & 'public' rather than 'audiophile elites'
both are great really lul
jh might be the mix but so as the price
Completely agree that the integration of HDMI is, and should be, a normal state for HiFi components at THE END OF 2023! I feel it's just such a missed opportunity when companies don't do it for some reason..
100% agree! Thanks for watching!
Thanks for the great and insightful videos@@andrewrobinsonreviews!
Your TH-cam is absolutely awesome and educational. Question: do you ever test jazz such as songs on TH-cam called greatest collection Whiskey Blues relaxing Whiskey Blues music?
was there a big difference when you tried the cambridge audio streamer, and has music cast finally added tidal connect? i used to own the rn803D but changed for cambridge audio cxa 81 with the magic dag200 and a wimmpro.
but i still like the yamaha sound and the 2000n is out of reach for me. so thanks for this great review i think yours is the first, love what you guys are doing
The fact that it has Wifi and bluetooth is unfortunate. I specifically went with the 801 for my office as I can't have any devices with Wifi or Bluetooth there. Maybe niche but just have an ethernet jack and call it a day. Wire all the things...
It does have an Ethernet jack, and if it’s anything like my Yamaha home theater receiver, then you can probably turn off Bluetooth completely. Can even unscrew the antenna to further disable those signals.
Faraday cage FTW!
Marantz just came out with the same type of amp called “the stereo 70” I bought it from Marantz about 6weeks ago. I don’t think Marantz has it out to the dealers yet. I have the Yamaha A-S 801 and like the amp a lot but no ARC or pre-outs. The new Marantz is awesome if you like that little warmer sound signature.
Our review of the Stereo 70 is in the works.
Wow! Finally a full-featured amp under 1000€ that's not a class D mini amp (Bluesound Edge). Marantz finally understood that most people just want HDMI eARC + Streaming + Sub Out in an amp. Everything else is gravy.
Yamaha has what I waited for. Tone Controls! Built in Phono pre amp! Meters! HDMI 🕺 I had held off on Audio Lab because I just couldn’t break from having tone controls. Now I can upgrade from my 80’s Yamaha Go figure. But what about the built in streamer? I use Apple music and Prime music through my TV to my receiver now. Is Music Cast as good as some stand alone streamers?
Always enjoy your reviews. Clear and concise info always
The streamer is good and its implementation within the app was flawless for us. It doesn't support Apple Music natively, but you can Airplay/BT or use the HDMI and a TV/AppleTV as a work around.
@@andrewrobinsonreviewsahh guess I will still be using the Apple TV but via HDMI now. That works
This is interesting. My Onkyo TX-SR313 is long in the tooth and since going 2.1 for home theatre I've been looking for a 2.1 reciever I can use with my TV (and not break the bank). I think this is a good option for me, kinda bothers me to get a 7.1 or 9.1 AV reciever when only using 2.1. Thank you for pointing this one out.
Good morning, friends!!
Hi Leezah!
Morning Leezah! Hope all is well!
@@KristiWrightHi Kristi!💖
@@andrewrobinsonreviewsHi Andrew! Hope you are well too!!💖
@@LeezahB doing well now that I'm getting to my coffee 😂
Thanks for another wonderful review. Just curious at this price point with HDMI, what would be the sound comparison between this and the Onkyo TX-RZ50 driven in 2 channels? I understand...apples and oranges...but maybe closer to zebras and appaloosa.
There are some sonic similarities and if I knew I wanted to split my time (even if it was 70 music/ 30 home theater) I'd probably opt for the Onkyo just to have that added flexibility.
Will this power a set of Magnat Transpuls, or KLH model 5, or similar large floor speaker?
Andrew I took your advice 0n the rotel ra 1592mk and am very happy with it I wonder could you please do a review on the advance Paris a12 it would be great to hear your thoughts about it
At 40% more expensive than the Bluesound Powernode in Australia it’s a hard sell in my view. I purchased the Bluesound to replace my last Yamaha receiver that died after 20 months of use. The repairer told me that Yamaha is perfect for those wanting to update their gear regularly but they’re no longer built to last. Hopefully Bluesound products last longer. At least the Yamaha warranty support were excellent.
It all depends on your use case. For me the Powernode wouldn't even be on my radar due to its lack of connections. With only Hdmi, 2x optical an no analog inputs... it pales in comparison to the Phono stage, USB input and several line-in connections on the Yamaha has on top of that. The Powernode is an entirely different beast.
I am really torn between keeping the Audiolab 7000A or trying this Yamaha! Any thoughts from folks with experience?
Paired with the Dali Opticon 6MK2's hybrid tweeter, high frequencies sound ever so clinical and digitally compared to what might be described as "Musical", smoother driven by Musical Fidelity (M5si) or Parasound (A23) I have tried. That said, I am blown away by the bass control and mid bass definition from the Audiolab and they have opened by eyes to a sound signature I adore! And so the search continues, fun!
Any thoughts on how this Yammy might compare. I am also drawn to the idea of consolidating the streamer into this unit as well, and say good by to this amazing yet clunky Rose RS250 box.
Thanks for the vid.
For me as non native english at 0.75 speed very comfortable ;)
Compatible for moving magnet cartridges - moving coil requires adding a phono preamp.
The Alva TT has a built-in phono pre as well as BT transmission. I tested the MM compatibility with our AudioTechnica/Ortofon Black as well. Apologies if it wasn't clear that the TT also helped me to test the amp's Bluetooth and analog/line-in capabilities.
No worries, here's how it is explained in the manual "The phono jacks of this product are compatible with MM cartridges. Use a step-up transformer or the like when connecting a turntable (record player) equipped with a MC (low-output cartridge". @@andrewrobinsonreviews
Would this pair well with NS-800 or NS-600 loudspeakers?
Any ideas on how this compares to the likes of CA Evo 75 and or Evo 150? Primarily for audio quality as features are similar.
Fab review. Thank you! 🙃
I’ll buy something like to replace my aging Home Theater Receiver but not to replace my all analog amp for my 2 channel setup.
Andrew, Kristi, good review and very high production quality. I own a Nuprime IDA8 integrated. Nuprime reviews are hard to find but all their amps, dacs, etc. I have listened to eo far were amazing. Any chance you consider the brand in the future? Keep up your hard work, it is greatly appreciated.
Had to google the company, but looks really interesting!
Andrew, any chance you’ll review subs soon? I would like your opinion on jl audio d110 please 🙏
Thanks! I forgot to mention the subwoofer output is a an excellent addition. Most speakers you review that interest me would benefit from a sub woofer i.e. Q Acoustics 5040 and such. If I want a truer surround sound I think a sound bar like the Samsung Q 990 C will be a good compliment.
This plus a Q990C for movies would be a really great and easy one-two punch!
How does it compare to denon pma 900 hne?
This has been upgraded !! Pro-Ject pre box s2 digital - edition 23
Thank you both so much for this review. I have now found my all in one solution to purchase this Yamaha 1000 to pair with my Klipsch rp 600m that I will receive tomorrow. P.S Love your channel and look forward to seeing more reviews. ❤
Thank you for this and many other detailed reviews.
I am wondering how would r-n100a pair with Q Acoustic 5040?
Would appreciate anyone’s feedback.
What do you think about this receiver with Heresy 4’s?
Thanks!
You bet!