The 1,000-Year-Old Human: Will AI Make Death Optional?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 103

  • @nighttalkersmedia
    @nighttalkersmedia หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    AARP will have to seriously raise their memberships age requirements.

  • @ConnoisseurOfExistence
    @ConnoisseurOfExistence หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The guest on the right had a very interesting idea how to get rid of AI hallucinations - by asking many models the same question and averaging the answers.

  • @ashishmaheshwari9618
    @ashishmaheshwari9618 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Let's first achieve the average lifespan of a human to 1000 years and let a whole generation go through the experience of living that long...By the next 50 years or less we will probably be preaparing for interstellar travel than we will want to have as much longer life as we can possibly have.

    • @CodexPermutatio
      @CodexPermutatio หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or maybe not, because a lot can go wrong on an interstellar journey and not many people would risk losing centuries of life.
      Still, there will be interstellar travelers in some form. Robots, perhaps, with copies of our minds.

  • @classicmax794
    @classicmax794 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Betteridge's law of headlines is an adage that states: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no."

    • @jmg9509
      @jmg9509 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I’ve discovered this truth just by my own mere observation. If it ends in a question mark, it’s click bait.

    • @damonstorms7884
      @damonstorms7884 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yeah, but it's not a real law. It's completely made up and does not apply to everything.

    • @classicmax794
      @classicmax794 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@damonstorms7884 yes, it's a real law. the word 'law' has more definitions than just the ones we use in physics and the legal system.

  • @SilverFan21k
    @SilverFan21k หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Cool video, ty Fortune!

  • @fteoOpty64
    @fteoOpty64 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    1000 years??! . Not in the next 500 years will we get such tech. Even for now, getting to 100 years old with a 65 year old body physique is still a dream. None of the experimental stuff even come close to it!.

    • @frv6610
      @frv6610 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      AI may solve the problem surprisingly fast

    • @nicholasmejia5545
      @nicholasmejia5545 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      My friend… if Knowledge is power then those who have it value there privacy.
      The same way us humans have learned to manipulate our environment, we will in time learn that our biology is just as manipulatable…
      Not trans humanism. This is age regression light years ahead of what most people are able to wrap there heads around. It does already exist.
      We are in an upward slope that is verticalizing, we just can’t see the full picture as individuals.

  • @AgentQQ8
    @AgentQQ8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Holy shit.

    • @kawalates8863
      @kawalates8863 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      accurate response

    • @HardKore5250
      @HardKore5250 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Ai bout to change the universe!

  • @popescuandrei3211
    @popescuandrei3211 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Snake oil, snake oil, come get your snake oil! Put A.I. and quantum in every second phrase and watch how A.I. will solve death, hunger, climate change, working, thinking, etc. C'mon...

    • @denjamin2633
      @denjamin2633 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      AI sustems have anyway been used for drug discovery and protein folding. If you can't extrapolate genuine medical advances from that than I don't know what to tell you.

  • @destinypuzzanghera3087
    @destinypuzzanghera3087 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Genius woman she is so smart I’m glad she is doing this work. Consider me Inspired

  • @GeorgiosAndreasIoannou
    @GeorgiosAndreasIoannou หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It can

  • @MissesWitch
    @MissesWitch 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Bryan Johnson watching this video like: 👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀

  • @kamu747
    @kamu747 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Switch on captions cc

  • @4arrows4all
    @4arrows4all หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I think the title forgot to add the words “for the rich.”

    • @damonstorms7884
      @damonstorms7884 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This is just a common misconception, pretty much all medical breakthroughs or tech may be available to only yhtose that can afford it simply because it just costs a lot of money for things in early development. And even then it always trickles down to where mainstream markets can afford it. Rich people simply are not keeping things to themselves simply because they would not make money if they didn't have people to sell it to.

  • @gorgthesalty
    @gorgthesalty หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How did COVID19 MRNA vaccine pass the 2nd phase which "cannot be accelerated?"

    • @Paraselene_Tao
      @Paraselene_Tao หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The mRNA vaccines were a very special case where nearly all research & development (including all 3 test phases), administration, manufacture, and so on was running in parallel and about as fast as we could possibly manage it. We had government help all around the world, and they were working on the problem as fast as reasonably possible. We went from noticing the disease in China on about Dec 31, 2019, to treating people with a vaccine on Dec 11, 2020. Also, we studied these vaccines and viruses for about 50 years before the pandemic occurred. This rapid deployment saved many millions of lives and trillions of dollars.
      It's possible that if we treated aging & age-related diseases as urgently as we treated Covid, then we might see big, rapid developments in anti-aging; however, it's not the public opinion to treat aging as a disease. Perhaps this will change.

    • @jfair7050
      @jfair7050 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "This rapid deployment saved millions of lives and trillions of dollars"
      What a load of Bullshit!
      How can you make such a statement, presumably with a straight face?
      You have absolutely no proof, just assumptions.
      "Apparently" though, there has been over 30 million excess deaths around the World, since the Covid vaccines were rolled out.
      And as far as saving trillions of dollars, the US's hubris, in thinking they could f*%k with Nature, for whichever twisted (apparently to protect against such an outbreak) purpose, are the ones that have caused immeasurable damage, financially and mentally, to this planet's human inhabitants.

  • @timetravelingschizophrenic987
    @timetravelingschizophrenic987 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cybernetics Ad Astra

  • @ghl19
    @ghl19 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I want to be my biological self as much as possible and have longevity. I don’t want to have to merge with the machines to live as much as I want

    • @frv6610
      @frv6610 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ye natural human

    • @HardKore5250
      @HardKore5250 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Or be half cyborg

  • @meeranraees3183
    @meeranraees3183 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    2:00

  • @meeranraees3183
    @meeranraees3183 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    0:09

  • @meeranraees3183
    @meeranraees3183 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    0:28

  • @mycount64
    @mycount64 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We have people living longer "on average" the maximum age of humans has not increased. People may live to 100 and are old for the last 30 years. We don't have people at the age of 30 staying the same health for 70 years. Plus the law of averages would dictate a fatal accident sooner than you think.

    • @squamish4244
      @squamish4244 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No. But a lot more people are living into old age than they used to, is the general point. It may give the less well-informed the wrong image that people were literally physically 90 years old when they were 50 back in the day, which of course was not true.
      Also, one thing that gets lost in the raw data is the quality of those years. I'm into history, and I read plenty of anecdotes about just how many people spent much of their lives in poor health. It's pretty shocking. The 'lifelong invalid' is a staple of old literature for a reason. And when people got sick, doctors couldn't do much but provide reassurance and hope they pulled through.

  • @megaplay
    @megaplay หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    👁 Quick answer. Yup but evil Rs gotta go.

  • @shieldmcshieldy5750
    @shieldmcshieldy5750 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pro-tip: be the kind of person AGI would grant longer life :)

  • @thymeparzival
    @thymeparzival หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What could possibly go wrong?

  • @ramamurigande9826
    @ramamurigande9826 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    All this is so dumb. No one has even identified where consciousness comes from or where it goes, furthermore the detailed way in which it goes. So this conversation of living here eternally is absurd.

    • @frv6610
      @frv6610 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      You are so smart that you missed that this is about anti aging, it's like taking c-vitamin

  • @pubguc6771
    @pubguc6771 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    T

  • @douglaswatt1582
    @douglaswatt1582 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    As long as we've been around we've been having wet dreams about immortality. The Greeks correctly saw this as hubris and not only did they see it as hubris but they understood that the size of our hubris predicted the size of our fall. Given how arrogant the concept of immortality really is, I think we're headed for a hard fall

    • @jeffkilgore6320
      @jeffkilgore6320 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Or not. I guess jellyfish must be incredibly arrogant. Old views.

    • @mynameisjeff9124
      @mynameisjeff9124 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Why would the concept of immortality be arrogant? The universe is large enough. Also, this is the first time in history where actually know what is happening in the body and make scientific predictions.

    • @jfair7050
      @jfair7050 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's not a question, of whether A.I. will be able to do it.
      It's a question of whether it gives the answer, or says FU.

    • @Dan-uf2vh
      @Dan-uf2vh หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Back then it was plausible that Gods commanded rain. There is no compare. Nowadays a large segment of the population still thinks that but at least we can know.

    • @lillygordon9121
      @lillygordon9121 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      but won't it be fun trying?

  • @Sci-Que
    @Sci-Que 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I wish I had taken a crash course in understanding broken English before I watch videos like this.

    • @matthewclarke5008
      @matthewclarke5008 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Just always practice understanding different accents and dialects, you get better at it over the years.

  • @IvyWilliams2
    @IvyWilliams2 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Hallelujah!!! I’m favored and blessed with $60,000 every week! Now I can afford anything and also support the work of God and the church.

    • @MelissaCarter4
      @MelissaCarter4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh really? Tell me more!,how do you make so much monthly? I’m interested.

    • @IvyWilliams2
      @IvyWilliams2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is what Ana Graciela Blackwelder does, she has changed my life.

    • @IvyWilliams2
      @IvyWilliams2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      After raising up to 60k trading with her, I bought a new house and car here in the US and also paid for my son’s (Oscar) surgery. Glory to God.shalom.

    • @YvonneChavez_0
      @YvonneChavez_0 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I know Ana Graciela Blackwelder, and I have also had success...

    • @YvonneChavez_0
      @YvonneChavez_0 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Absolutely! I have heard stories of people who started with little or no knowledge but managed to emerge victorious thanks to Ana Graciela Blackwelder.

  • @doomguydemonkiller
    @doomguydemonkiller หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nah I rather just wait for the Millennial reign of Christ

  • @MrSeadawg123
    @MrSeadawg123 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What a BS discussion. Complete waste of time.

  • @WhatEver-xn5sn
    @WhatEver-xn5sn หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What did she actually say starting from around 2:20? I can't understand the 3 or 4 sentences she says starting from there. Anybody help? Thanks.

    • @jfair7050
      @jfair7050 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      "Think about it"..

    • @WhatEver-xn5sn
      @WhatEver-xn5sn หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jfair7050 No at 2:21 it sounds like "Nikidi Bauxi" ?!?!
      Then at 2:28 "The bo-bogmatics being there..." wtf is bogmatics?

    • @jfair7050
      @jfair7050 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I was actually taking the piss a bit, in how she kept saying "Think about it" 😛
      But the first one may be nucleus biopsy? As it fits the subject matter..

    • @jfair7050
      @jfair7050 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Second one might be dogmatics?..
      "Dogmatics relied on theory, especially the humoral theory of health and disease, to practice medicine. The Empiric school of medicine, on the other hand, asserted that only observation and experience, not theory, is a sufficient foundation for medical knowledge and practice"

    • @ChessMasterNate
      @ChessMasterNate หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      "Liquid biopsy" is the first, hard to understand, term. "Ba Ba Mathithics"...who the heck can understand what that was supposed to be? I looked up liquid biopsy and it is indeed a method for detecting caner using Phlebotomy, detecting metastasizing caner cells. "Metastasizing" or some variation on the word is probably somewhere in "Ba Ba Mathithics." Man, her English is rough.

  • @USAtoElsewhere
    @USAtoElsewhere 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Cradle to grave! You too think if aging doesnt kill is something else will? Accident prevention is gaining too. Off i go to another video.

  • @ba_charles
    @ba_charles 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    grow up