ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 มิ.ย. 2024
- The Supreme Court appears poised to allow abortions in medical emergencies in Idaho, according to a document that was erroneously posted on the court’s website briefly, according to Bloomberg News. #CNN #news
Want to stay up to date on the day’s top stories? Sign up for CNN’s 5 Things newsletter, and we’ll give you the 5 biggest stories you need to know, videos people are watching, and more!
Sign up here: www.cnn.com/newsletters/5-thi...
They intentionally leaked it before the debate. So trumps anti-abortion stance won't seem so harsh.
Tell me in real life though how this will apply? If I was a doctor I would still worry and what's to say they won't go at it again later
Trump is personally pro life but has stated clearly that he has no plans of getting involved in state issues and believes a compromise between these groups is best. His stance seems logical and not harsh at all.
@@HM-yk8ceTrump is a pathological liar who has flip flopped all over the place when it comes to abortion, women's health and reproductive rights. He has zero integrity when it comes to this issue and will say anything for power!
@@HM-yk8cehaha yet he was pro choice for his entire life before he decided to run for president for the opposite party. And yall just ate it up. He also stated on national television that he believes a woman who gets an abortion should be punished. So whi h of his words do you believe? The ones that agree with your belief? Anx you just ignore the other comments? Weird huh?
@@HM-yk8ceany man that want to tell a woman what to do with her body is harsh, especially while saying they are pro-life but not pro-child.
It's not a leak, its strategy
i agree but is it clear who it benefits to have it leaked?
Go on…
why it is a strategy. it was gonna be released within a week anyway.
an extra 2 days of press coverage does not one any good or harm.
Hmmm before the debate …..
@@DRnab1983stop Alex jones, roll with it’s about the ELECTION then you have a leg to stand on , we all know Dipsht isn’t going to debate , he’s all jazz hands and zingers , he has zero grasp of anything beyond transactional acts, this debate won’t change the view of a MAGA , this might nudge female and sympathetic GOP non full blown voter , but the folks behind Biden already were pissed about Dobbs
How stupid do you think we are???
This isn’t a mistake. It’s another political move.
Alito wants the public to react negatively
Rollback the rollback after the decision to roll back.
exactly
Meanwhile when the leak benefited Democrats last time, the leaker was never caught. I think that was on the Dobbs case? Democrats made all kinds of political hay out of that.
Womp womp.
Thank You
Legislating healthcare. What could go wrong? The only people that should be involved in healthcare decisisons is the doctors and individuals
Full term abortion is murder without a doubt. Not a medical decision Yall pushed it too far! If a person causes a miscarriage, the assailant gets charged with murder.
You will never convince religious fanatics of that.
@@robr177 I'm religious but I agree with the original comment. To me, this should never have been a politicized matter, it should've been kept as a healthcare matter between doctor and patient and their God if they are a believer. It's not my place to judge, draw conclusions, etc., about a healthcare and/or religious choice that someone else makes.
@@robr177 Fuck religious fanatics. This is America - it was founded by theists, who were the equivalent of modern-day atheists. America was founded specifically with the freedom to have any religion or none at all. What an enlightened idea.
Healthcare😂😂😂😂?? U mean murder
If my wife, girlfriend, daughter was at serious risk, guess how many f***'s I would give about a court ruling?
Of course, but the doctors do care because they can get sued.
@@gaileverett Yes, like in the dark ages. Easy for me to say, but I see an ethical imperative. Professionals must give priority to their oath or code of ethics. For a silly example, ban reinforced concrete. Should a structural engineer sign off on a legal bridge that will collapse, or an illegal one that will be safe? If we don't defer to expertise, we might as well put an end to higher learning. And there is no more vital expertise than that in the medical profession .. which is why there is legal precedent for blood transfusions against parents' religious beliefs.
@@danmayberry1185 I've thought about this dilemma often. We can cheer a doctor who puts his whole career on the line for ethical position, but why should the doctor be in that position in the first place? I can't fault a doctor who hesitates to buck the system when the result could, or would, be blacklisting and economic ruin that would affect all members of the doctor's family that depend on the doctor being able to continue being a doctor in good standing rather than a penniless revolutionary.
This is why the current mess is leading back to the days of back-alley abortions of the 50s and 60s, not because of women choosing abortion on a whim, but because of women needing to terminate a pregnancy to save their lives.
Funny how they’re allowed to practice medicine without a license with no repercussions.
Imagine being in the middle of a life-threatening medical emergency and a bunch of lawyers walk in the room and say "Don't worry we'll take it from here" JFC
And look at the three Justices who voted AGAINST allowing abortions in emergency situations. Disgusting misogyny on display.
@harveywilkinson2432 happens every day.
That's not what they're doing at all. That's what the 46th president tried doing in September 2021 when he attempted forced vaccination of everybody when it hurt a lot of people
What about Bidens attempted forced vaccination
Again!!!! I think we can stop saying "mistake" or "accident".
liberal clerk intentionally leaked it
It's called intentional, premeditated strategy. It's not an oops.
Mind Begs the Question:
▪︎If Judiciary,Police are too weak
▪︎To arrest clearly criminal Politicians
▪︎Who support Starvation,Ethnic Cleansing,etc
▪︎Judiciary,Police safeguarding - Nation or Elites?
What a joke the Supreme Court has become.
The democrat party has become a joke, America has become a joke.
Mind Begs the Question:
▪︎If Judiciary,Police are too weak
▪︎To arrest clearly Criminal Politicians
▪︎Who support Starvation,Ethnic Cleansing,etc
▪︎Judiciary,Police work for - Nation or Elites?
It’s disgusting that there was a legal debate over how close to death does a pregnant woman have to be before doctors should help her. That Idaho was against saving the health of a mother shows how terrible Idaho really is. There’s just a general hate towards women
... at least toward women who want control of their own bodies. I'm sure conservative Idahoans are very fond of their obedient, complaisant wives.
You sure about that?
Idaho is one of the fasting growing states. Must be because women are hated there…
😂😂
No abortion is medically necessary
🤣🤣
I can confirm that Idaho is as garbage as you make it out to be.
And to think we actually pay for these jackasses to carry out the wishes of the Federalist Society and other dark money operators.
They get paid twice.
creepy, leaky court: its rotten.
SCOTUS has become a sickening tasteless joke
Most of their decisions lately have favored liberals, but I guess since they support the founding documents and not communism and socialism people like you dont like them
Why ? Because they didn't rule your way 🤡
Ohhh, because you don’t agree wither decisions? If it was 6-3 liberal justices you’d love them right? We’ll roe v wade was overturned 9-0 don’t ever forget that.
@@user-qv8df9vj2o Because Roe v Wade shouldn't have been overturned. It isn't just about disagreement, it's about sound epistemology backing one's philosophy. It isn't just about the Supreme Court, the real issue is that the average American citizen is insufficiently educated to formulate a cogent line of argumentation on this topic. I'll just venture a guess that you aren't either.
@@user-qv8df9vj2o No, Because they have become a bought & paid for partisan disgrace to this Nation!!
Bs it was posted accidentally
Yeah, ok. 🤪
CNN, how do we spin this
It takes the focus off Trump.
Did Alito Leak it again ? 🤣🤣
He's probably in cahoots with Cannon. I'm guessing that's why he was MIA last week.
He'll say his wife did it.
Yup
Remember when a leftist leaked the roe v wade opinion deliberately in order to intimidate justices? Your disgusting hypocrisy is showing
@@PacificForageActually Clarence Thomas actually oversees that Circuit.
BREAKING NEWS: After sinking below all expectations, the Supreme Court's reputation has now reached the Earth's magma mantle! Republicans claim this is all normal, and "it's not even that hot down here anyway".
And the reputation of this court continues to sink…
They are following the constitution. If you don't like it find a new country.
Only to your type
For a man to say that saving the life of a woman, which basically is what you've said, I say fine. What's good for the goose is good for the gander...karma is coming.
@@drzaius1121your constitution is that bad?
@drzaius1121
They're blatantly biased.
LEGISLATURES AND COURTS *STILL* PRACTICING MEDICINE WITHOUT A LICENSE.
What?😂
We need a global law that states "no court may interfere with decisions between a person and their doctor". And while we are at it, "that no insurance company can deny a treatment or medication that has been agreed on between a patient and their doctor, or by the patient's doctor". Hippa laws need to be extended to keep the government, and insurance companies, out of a patient's medical care. Your insurance should cover what is listed with no exceptions. When we pay for insurance, it is to save our lives, not make them or save them an extra dollar.
You should have been a dictator.
This is a good way to do it I agree.not a dictator statement 😂
Now do wax xines
Sounds good to me
Why don't you get your checkbook out and start paying 5x the amount for insurance.
So if the opinions are written why don’t the just release them all. Why play games with a release date. Or in this case everyday is potentially someone’s life lost.
Probably to keep from making both sides angry at the same time.
Bcuz scotus can do what they want and the right wing majority loves drama.
They revise opinions and they become law when they are released. It would be a cluster fuck to have 80 cases out at once.
@@evanb4189 No it wouldn't. There is no difference between releasing 20 rulings in one day versus stretching it out over a week or two.
They know that it's intentional.
SCOTUS is a total, unprofessional mess.
I love this Trump Supreme Court!
Following the constitution is not something Democrats are familiar with.
You mean SCROTUM don't you?
@@justiceforall6412 don't like the constitution then find a new country kiddo
@@joewearsadroolbib7347 you love a bunch of incompetent clowns who don't take it any more seriously than a 12 year old?
Really stinks that we have to put up with you people's infantile tantrums.
The Supreme Court accidentally did something. How about that!
Well federal law already supersedes state law, so they just upheld the way it’s supposed to work, but for this SCOTUS, not overturning decades of precedent in order to allow women to get healthcare is a heavy lift for them
And CNN reporting without full confirmed facts 😂
CNN does do that surprised not SURD MORE
@@Brittanyjustgoes just FYI but that's how "breaking news" works
@@Brittanyjustgoes why are you saying this? what's wrong w you?
look to your right, multiple stations/channels are reporting the exact same thing.
it looks like all the facts are confirmed.
which makes your post entirely worthless.
Don't believe was an accident!
They are now just a joke to me. The reputation of the court is ruined.
Since the Scott v Sandford decision.
"Land of the Free"......unless your government tells you what you can and can't do with your body.
You mad you can’t kill babies?
Did you hold that view when Biden made vaccines mandatory?
@@kittiepride7772 they have no shame😂😂😂😂
You mad because you can’t kill your baby in your womb?
Not a mistake. Stop calling strategy a mistake. Stop it.
ANY suppression or inhibition of one's own body, is a violation of Constitutional right to self autonomy. Hopefully, one day, religious fundamentalists and nationalists, will understand and respect this.
😂😂😂😂 yeah ok.
What did you call the vax mandates😂😂😂😂?
The fact that they "leaked" the overturning of Roe makes this "accidental" upload of abortion support truly a choice bookend.
So besides being hacks, they're incompetent hacks.
they've done this before, it's no mistake!!
Grow thicker skin 😂
What’s more of an emergency than the choice to terminate a pregnancy based on ANY reason. It’s a mental health emergency in MANY cases. Not just the physical health of the pregnant person!
🤣🤣
This legislation from the bench has gotten out of hand.
SCOTUS is acting like they are 12.
Three of them were nominated by someone who acts like he is four
As an American, how does it make you feel to know that the federal government, and state government, can have control over your body?
They did with the COVID vaccine. And the draft
How about school vaccinations, COVID, a d the draft? They've had control for years.
It’s the government who installs the health department and medical places. so they have a right to tell you what they want to do in a facility that is governed by them.
It’s their procedures. Their hospitals. They can tell you if they want to perform a procedure or not.
I’m more concerned with the child’s life who gets no say, no consideration.
A total circus 🎪. By a tremendous circus 🎪 team of 9 clowns.
This is from the same play book the court used when they struck down Roe v Wade
This was not a mistake. At that level there are no mistakes.
In an apparent case of premature opinionation, the Supreme Court briefly posted a decision in an Idaho case centered on emergency abortions Wednesday, before quickly scrubbing it from its website.
The ruling would have affirmed a lower court injunction that allows abortions in medical emergencies to proceed in the Gem State, according to Bloomberg, which caught the inadvertent filing.
love it - premature opinionation!
This is what happens when incompetent children of the court's cronies are hired as clerks & assistants instead of hiring qualified professionals.
Looks like Gorsuch, Alito and Thomas think a women's primary function is as a baby factory.
Honestly I’m surprised the “I like beer” Justice also didn’t join these.
I find it difficult to believe that there is such and easy threshold across systems that would allow for an "accidental" release like this.
How are we going to define an emergency that's not life-threatening?
You don't have to, cupcake. That's what doctors are for. How about we just let doctors treat patients?
@@harveywilkinson2432 Amen! Or- wait for it....Maybe the woman's mental and physical state and her wishes and best wisdom on what course she would like to pursue should ultimately be the one deciding where possible. It's supposed to be who doctors listen to and respect- the patient.
@@harveywilkinson2432 what specific parameters have been given to the doctors that will differentiate what is permitted and what is not?
@@ladyofbast250 Doctors don't need "specific parameters" provided to them by lawyers with no medical training dictating how they treat patients. If your family were in a horrible car accident and taken to an ER while bleeding to death do you want the doctors treating you and your kids or do you want them to get on the phone and start calling lawyers? Because that is literally what is happening now with pregnant women suffering from catastrophic bleeding and life-threatening pregnancies. It's an utter disgrace.
@@harveywilkinson2432🤣🤣
Not being allowed to have control over your own body is the very definition of government over-reach, and government intrusion. Whatever happened to "don't tread on me?"
Like the mandated COVID vaccine?
people dont hold any consistency in their values, as long as stuff is happening that they want to see, theyre happy for it, the "values" they hold are really just memes that make them feel/sound good and righteous
That's nothing. @@Blgtn43
@@Blgtn43 lol you were never under any threat of criminalization from not taking a vaccine. Get it together bro
@karmaceutical3963 is okay for Show.
Was this a mistake? Or was this a test to see how people would react?
Newsflash: maybe total strangers will let the woman you love live. But maybe not.
🎯🎯🎯
Watch Ryan Hamilton's interview with Lincoln Project's Rick Wilson from yesterday. His wife was forced to bleed out for days and nearly died. Really sadly compelling story like so many are going through. Appreciate those that speak up.
🤣🤣
Lindsey Graham mansplains his federal abortion ban: 'I picked 15 weeks.' Got it, ladies?🤰
Deliberate, not "accidental." Meant to help Trump/Republicans & SCOTUS itself, using Trump's repetitious tactic of casting doubt, confusion, distraction, suspicion.
Do you agree with the decision or not
?
@@paulpaul9226 Exactly, they whine when they get their way and whine when they don't.
@@paulpaul9226 I don't agree with any of the current SCOTUS justices' decision on abortion unless they admit they were mistaken when they ruled that pregnant women are property of the state where they reside & rule that the state laws banning abortion are unconstitutional.
@@mariesmith8454 I'm all for abortion but I don't see anything in the constitution that covers abortion
@@paulpaul9226 , "The Ninth Amendment provides that the enumeration of certain rights in the Constitution should not be construed to mean that the Constitution does not protect rights that are not enumerated. The Amendment was included in the Bill of Rights to address fears that expressly protecting certain rights might be misinterpreted implicitly to sanction the infringement of others."---Cornell Law School
Btw, I'm pro choice, not "pro-abortion."
I wonder if they leak this stuff to soften the blow of the actual announcement.
Of course
They do it so people fear abortion bans less.
Possibly, but also potentially to influence certain colleagues that are NOT going along with the corrupt, partisan Leonard Leo regressive block.
the toddlers are running the pre school
Yup. Biden is definitely a toddler.
@@lightworker4813 your brain has holes in it
They never revealed the leaker from before. Why don't they think he/she didn't do it again?
We know it’s Alito
Because it was most likeky Alito or his insane wife
Just in time for debate season
SCOTUS does not have its sh*t together.
You misspelled the POTUS
What do you expect when three were nominated by trump
All the sudden a woman can be defined again 🤦
But then the mother will live
Who knew so many "accidents happen" with the Supreme Court? Especially this version of the SC.
This is not a win for women or republicans. They're working on removing other rights as we speak. What about for mental health, r.pe, etc...how is that supposed to be decided? What if the foetus has severe deformation?
Thought abortion was up to each state. Why the interference from SCOTUS?
There are existing federal laws that guarantee your right to receive emergency medical treatment when your life is threatened and states are not allowed to pass laws that violate this principle. Idaho and several other regressive states have passed laws that violate this principle so it requires resolution from SCOTUS.
Read the constitution. State decisions can be appealed to the US Supreme Court if they impinge on certain Constitutional rights.
It' was SCOTUS that threw this back to the states. Had they affirmed Roe we wouldn't be having these cases nor would women be in the position of begging their doctors for care. This is their whole entire mess- they own it.
@@Nonameforyoudangit I don't know the case so what rights were violated?
@@harveywilkinson2432 ok. Thanks. I didn't know the case
Vote blue . Repair the court .
Fix the court like they did against Trump ? Muh democracy isn't really something y'all really care about, you just want to win at all costs
I care more about the authoritarian actions and positions of the democrats as an independent, like Biden being responsible for causing the US Dollar, OUR NUMBER ONE EXPORT BY FAR, to lose value by weaponizing it making other countries and OPEC nations accept other currency.
Trump may be an arrogant ass but at least he didn't flood the US with 13 million immigrants THEN use an executive order to pretend he was stopping it but in reality made it legal to allow 2500 immigrants in DAILY before he MIGHT close the border which just means the rest have to go to the ports or entry rather then crossing wherever they damn well feel like it.
Hell no!
We know y'all "fix" the courts. Because y'all know you can't win fairly
@@glennleatherwood4552 I believe I said repair .
Please watch a great example of first hand ordeal of days with lack of access to appropriate care from a TX husband that Lincoln Project's Rick Wilson did with Ryan Hamilton yesterday. These Justices and state legislators are literally torturing women.
Yes please
Has anyone tried litigating DNR (Do Not Recessitate) orders? I would imagine the 'pro life' crowed would be against DNRs. That should be challenged as well.
Funny how this comes out just after I said the Supreme court as blood on its hands on here.
The supreme court is feeling the heat of many speaking about their incompetence and its corruption!!!
@@mjh4226Considering trust in SCOTUS at 18% is lowest it’s ever been, not surprising that the SCOTUS may be regretting their Dobbs decision somewhat though at the end of the day, the r.w. Justices don’t care.
Yup, it's all about You and Your god.
"dismissed as improvidently granted" - not a glitch with this Court! It's their feature, especially when it comes to abortion cases and "inadvertently leaked opinions". Funny how those without uteri make law about those that do have them and expect respect for doing so. 😂😂😂😂😂
Unlike Drumpf's immunity appeal where it is STILL dragging it's feet more than 6 months after the prosecutor asked SCOTUS for an immediate ruling on the matter? Chutkan can't wait to get that case back in her jurisdiction - neither can I! Popcorn 🍿?
Perhaps Saints Thomas and Alito should out Jackson here as the guilty party and along with Chief Roberts (as the most senior trio) call for some ethics as a show of GREAT LEADERSHIP. 😂😂😂😂😂
Be ready for more such stories like this until the final decision of this term is "officially" released.
It’s a ruse. An attempt to soften the opposition to their previous abortion rulings before the election (knowing that it is massively damaging to Republican appeal).
Thanks for the reminder . . . . women, and supportive loving men vote accorddingly: vote BLUE all the way from the top of the ticket to the bottom.
🤣🤣
لا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله
If we ever hope to restore balance to the Supreme Court, we must ensure every eligible voter turns out at the ballot box this November and elect a Democratic super majority in the U.S. Senate, Congress, and the presidency.
🤣🤣 Dictatorship?
Roe v Wade was not about women’s rights, it was about DOCTOR’S RIGHT to perform abortions.
Even R B Ginsberg stated the previous decision was unconstitutional, creates divisiveness, and should be corrected on the state level, according to the constitution.
“Roe isn’t really about the woman’s choice, is it?” Ginsburg said. “It’s about the doctor’s freedom to practice…it wasn’t woman-centered, it was physician-centered.”
Ginsburg actually didn’t think Roe was the best case for establishing abortion rights. She would have preferred a case she worked on as a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union in the early 1970s.
Ginsburg, who died in 2020, criticized the 7-to-2 decision both before and after she joined the high court. She argued that it would have been better to take a more incremental approach to legalizing abortion, rather than the nationwide ruling in Roe that invalidated dozens of state antiabortion laws. She suggested a ruling protecting abortion rights would have been more durable if it had been based on the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution - in other words, if it had focused on gender equality rather than the right to privacy that the justices highlighted.
“Roe v. Wade, in contrast, invited no dialogue with legislators. Instead, it seemed entirely to remove the ball from the legislators’ court. In 1973, when Roe v. Wade was issued, abortion law was in a state of change across the nation. As the Supreme Court itself noted, there was a marked trend in state legislatures ‘toward liberalization of abortion statutes.’ ”
This is why I’m so thankful I moved my family to the safety of a sanctuary state. Our city has made every effort to make abortion available to all birthing people and especially to our low income and POC communities. Vote blue to save our democracy. 💙💙
Stupidity. Democrat is the party threatening Democracy if you'd care to actually research what they've done and try to do. 1st amendment violations, 2d amendment violations, using DOJ, FBI and tech companies to squelch free speech. Wake up mindless lib.
Women. The word is women. A man cannot give birth. End of story.
A trans man is still female, which makes him a woman, Just stop.
I have absolutely no problem with someone who is truly transgender doing whatever they need to do to live their best life, but I am not going to change the English language because everyone has lost their damn minds. Most truly transgender people will tell you they don't agree with this craziness, and it's just making it harder for them.
No way I would ever vote blue. Especially after this past 3+ years.
Birthing people…🤣🤣
As a member of a thriving red state we whole heartedly support your decision.....enjoy the high cost of living and high crime rates. Independent voters....unless you want our whole country to look like California's human feces covered streets, vote anything but blue.
Imagine throwing the term abortion around as if it doesn't mean the murder of a defenseless baby
It doesn't
@@Really-ej8jtIt literally does.
@@lightworker4813 no it doesn't. Abortion has never murdered a baby ever
Imagine a baby being born that nobody wanted. Don't tell me about adoption.
The Left murdered 100 million people in the last century alone - you really think they give two damns about a mere "65 million" murdered babies?!?!*
Supreme Court decision on abortion inadvertently gets posted too soon. Sounds like Deja vue to me.
Women are not livestock.
(gotta exclude Ginny "Miss Piggy" Thomas from that one)
This coverage is so distorted. The Supreme Court is not ruling on whether to "allow" or "disallow" abortions. This is a case about federal preemption of a state law. The fact that it involves abortion is largely irrelevant to the legal issues at hand, even if hugely important to those impacted. If you have a problem with it, call your legislator but don't pretend the Supreme Court made the law.
The problem is the timing of this leak. it's suspicious and it's the second time it happenned under this current SCOTUS. no matter the merits , it has an effect that nobody would be unaware.
Evil just evil
Abortion is evil.
The competence of this court is suspect.
The media is a joke if they think this was inadvertent.
I missed the part where they said they agreed that it was a mistake.
Like good journalist do, they simply laid out the facts that were presented to them. There was no opinion offered in any way.
@@MrJperri11 Everything you've ever learned about what is going on in the world, you've learned from the media.
This particular video was pretty accurate.
Y'all just don't like CNN.. probably because it's just cool to hate them.
CNN is better than most. And that's a fact.
You guys should be happy they also decided against free speach the dems should like that
Wrong... the Supremes decided that IDIOT RIGHTIE MISINFORMATION is not protected SPEECH. What you are arguing for is the RIGHT TO LIE and DECEIVE. Intelligent people are against screaming fire in a theatre and this MISINFORAMTION they were spreading was costing Americans their lives. Speech, like the right to own a gun is not UNLIMITED. You guys quote the Constitution but never recite the whole text... just the parts you want.
110% chance cnn gave senile Joey the questions in advance of tomorrow’s debate
I didn't think of that. Probably true
He doesn't need any help. The old man can do in an hour what you couldn't do in a month if you were our President, and yet you throw out insults out of sheer idiotness.
@@CA-tk8ynlol that’s why your guy has been hiding for 7 days 😂 stop drinking the kool aid. Your guy can’t even walk up the big boy steps of af1 anymore
@@CA-tk8ynwhat is impressive about Joe being president?? That he wakes up late and calls lids by 4pm?? Or he awkwardly shuffles away from the press, and just ignorantly grins at them when they try and get him to answer questions?? So strong
@@CA-tk8ynhe doesn’t need help? Thats why he’s hiding for 7 days and has 16 aids helping him try and get ready to debate 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Well, so glad to hear that the SC has decided to *allow* women to make certain health decisions under certain conditions. How gracious of them! What else will women be *allowed* to do?
Question; what is the leading cause of death in America?
I don't understand why I'm a multimillionaire and I still live in this country and pay taxes as a woman. I can work anywhere in the world. It's time to abandon the sinking ship.
The more abortion is regulated, the more expensive and less safe it becomes. That said, fewer abortions is a worthy goal. That's why I can't understand how someone Pro Life can vote against W.I.C. We are a rich country. There's no reason a child has to go to bed in a car ; no reason a child has to go hungry. No reason a child can't have health care. No reason a smart child cant go to college. No reason a pregnant woman should be afraid to have a child. We can do better.
The Supreme Court is as leaky as a 95 year old man who can’t make it to the toilet in time.
Biden?
Inadvertently? How do they know it was inadvertent?
Almost as bad as when Alito leaked the Dobbs decision.
I have little faith in the integrity of the current SCOTUS. I'm sick of them honestly. RBG is rolling in her grave; I wish she were here.
Even all the way from Europe, I can tell this was deliberate.
When the SC makes a ruling on a medical decision that should be between a doc and patient, isn’t that practicing medicine without a license?
Their staff/crew are incredibly talented.
All three trump judges should resign. Governments exercise their JUST Powers through the consent of the people. The electoral college denys that consent. Twice in this century.
This is yet another non relevant issue meant to keep our focus off the issues that matter.
For the love of corn.... What's the big deal?? That it was leaked? It concerns one state, Idaho, in a medical emergency. Geeeeeze
A " block buster ruling " ...
Why do I have such doubt ? 🤥
C'mon, Throwing women a bone hoping it will soften the blow of overturning Roe V Wade.
6 Men and 3 women get to decide the fate of over half the US population. I think we need a recount with only the women getting to vote…
I agree with only letting women vote on this issue, but there are 5 men and 4 women, not 6/3. Women are Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson, Barrett.
What the hell?
The title of this should be "in a DELIBERATE mistake". Nothing stunning about it.
Or just "take".
WHERE IS THE CAPTIONING 😳😧🥺thanks alot from those of us who NEED captioning!
Accidentally posted? Hardly
What about rape and incest? 🤬🤬🤬
Media KNOWS this wasn't a leak. But I guess TV show anchors realize going against your boss's narrative is bad news bears.
Check with justice Alito leaking is what he does.