damn, 2 to 3 minutes in this really difficult chapter, i realize that i need to go back to chapter 2 to better understand the formula. let's go, I'll be back soon, i hope.
so im confused with the Trilemma. I understand the first two ( 1 and 2 does not imply 3 & 2 and 3 does not imply 1) but the last one I do not, how can 3 & 1 be combined if you can't have monetary policies with a fixed exchange rate?
life saver!!!!!! I have an international economics test today
Help so much
Glad to see this video before the exam tomorrow.
@FinanceKid You are a god! Thanks so much for this great series of lectures :)
Thanks! Good luck with your class
Hi, great video! Is there a way we can access the PowerPoint slides?
2:15 to 2:20 Sounds like another way to put it is that the equilibrium is the point at which "no trade occurs"
Thank you for the video!!
damn, 2 to 3 minutes in this really difficult chapter, i realize that i need to go back to chapter 2 to better understand the formula. let's go, I'll be back soon, i hope.
Thank you :)
so im confused with the Trilemma. I understand the first two ( 1 and 2 does not imply 3 & 2 and 3 does not imply 1) but the last one I do not, how can 3 & 1 be combined if you can't have monetary policies with a fixed exchange rate?
thanks again
THANKYOU SO MUCH
mhhokay