Buckling of a Thin Column.MP4

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 99

  • @Jekvan
    @Jekvan 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its safe to say here that a common notion is,the lecturers and assistants around the world have a way of making stuff utterly complicated to understand.
    Thank you thank you thank you for considering the little students which only try to understand the material.Thank you much.

  • @isaacbourn8031
    @isaacbourn8031 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    12 years later, thank you so much for this video !

  • @johny1913
    @johny1913 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear professor, you made a great video, thank you very much. Your explanation is really clear and simple and you can say in a few minutes more than our teachers in a lot of hours.
    Greetings from Czech Republic

  • @sandyguerrero1
    @sandyguerrero1 10 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Make more videos! You teach better than my professor. :-)

  • @purdueMET
    @purdueMET  15 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Assuming the boundary conditions are identical, a column will buckle in the direction of the smallest value of I. The column that looks like a ruler will buckle in the direction of the smallest dimension.

  • @2ndcolumn
    @2ndcolumn 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you very much, your skill as a professor is incredible! Simply direct to the point. Cheers.

  • @Sanjaymaxtorque
    @Sanjaymaxtorque 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Was looking for something on Euler Column buckling that I'm checking on Aircraft stiffened panels. This is just what I needed. Thanks!

  • @AvisMcgill
    @AvisMcgill 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you
    Your videos have helped me through my class and I got A +

  • @purdueMET
    @purdueMET  14 ปีที่แล้ว

    @ARIJ88 I'm glad the video helps. I'm doing more videos every week.

  • @juanpablodt
    @juanpablodt 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you very much, my teacher did not expain any of this and I was very confused reading thorugh my notes. Your videos are well explained and now everything is getting clear.

  • @MrZulkefabdul
    @MrZulkefabdul 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @MrZah89 I tried to calculate Pcr (not Pe) and I got 25.24N. Pcr=(Pi^2X5.516X10E3MPaX144mm^4)/(1)(557.3mm)^2. Try that. U must have got your unit wrong.
    For Prof French, u are great. This is a great refresher for me. It's much easier to listen to u than reading text like Juvinall or Mott.

  • @meemouk
    @meemouk 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    nice straight forward explanation

  • @DarvaishBandah
    @DarvaishBandah 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish u to be my teacher.. u explained better than mah professor.. old is really gold

  • @akhalakhusain5761
    @akhalakhusain5761 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your explanation way is so interesting 👌👌👌👌👌

  • @carltolentino2044
    @carltolentino2044 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Higher cross section and shorter length will Greatly increased it's load capacity. To get the critical stress just divide it by area.

  • @mklsenaka5323
    @mklsenaka5323 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great again. please add more. can you upload a clip explaining how finite element method is used in computer based design? the approaches , determination steps and understanding outcomes in that report.

  • @benji8861
    @benji8861 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    columm AB carries a centric load P of magnitude 60kn. cables BC and BD are taut and prevent motion of point B in the xz plane. using euler formula and a factor safety of 2.2 , gelect tension in cable. determine the maz allowable length L...this is the qns

  • @TroyaE117
    @TroyaE117 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Remember guys, that the column is never truly straight and so the column buckles from the moment you put any compressive load on it, no matter how small. Remember that "buckling" is defined as a column that wishes to worsen its curvature.
    The Euler buckling load is better described as the maximum allowable end load before the buckling curvature "runs away" and, it fails catastrophically. It is the limit allowable compressive load. It is not the load that initiates buckling.

  • @attemptthis
    @attemptthis 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @MrZah89 make sure you put your GPa in as MPa to get the units correct

  • @SunilSundar
    @SunilSundar 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there a way to predict the buckling of a thin walled beam in bending? Such as the wing spar of an aircraft

  • @guitarczar15
    @guitarczar15 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow your way better than my structures professor

  • @hazarakhan851
    @hazarakhan851 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you it is very helpful and I learn a lot from your videos.

  • @hungrypenguin1
    @hungrypenguin1 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm a bit confused for the rectangle's second moment of inertia, if i instead took b = 4mm and h = 27 mm that would give I =6561mm^4 which is much larger than the square's. Why do you choose b and h in that particular way?

  • @gopalakrishnanarava423
    @gopalakrishnanarava423 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    ur very brilliant explanation all the topics very good sir! i like so much ur teaching.....

  • @sree1010
    @sree1010 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great teaching.. good informative video.. congrats

  • @kabbirhossain7816
    @kabbirhossain7816 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Normally we consider the minimum value of the moment of inertia thus we get the direction of bulckling. But what happens for square cross sections? Since there's equal value of moment of inertia in both ways?

  • @HobbsO
    @HobbsO 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good video. Got an exam on this soon and it's good to learn something that takes a lecturer 2 hours.
    P.S. English units? Do you mean imperial? The UK has been metric for over 30 years.

  • @thundernerdt
    @thundernerdt 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for your perfect explination!, it helps me out a lot. Greetings from the Netherlands.

  • @fmwaaris
    @fmwaaris 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    can u please explain me wts the major and wts the minor axis. I cant picture it! wen we say rotation about x-axis, how does the beam rotate? do the flanges bend downwards, or sideways? pls help me out here!

  • @spikes1529
    @spikes1529 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks so much, can you do one on failing under compression too?

  • @benji8861
    @benji8861 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    hey prof, can i request to see if you could put up video on buckling in the yz plane and xz plane. and also, explain the formula for inertia Ix if it is in the yz plane and the inertia Iy in the xz plane?
    thanks!

  • @abdulfatahabushagur8425
    @abdulfatahabushagur8425 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks, very well explained buckling

  • @purdueMET
    @purdueMET  14 ปีที่แล้ว

    @1932chevrolet Wow. This thing must be the battleship of the kayak world. I'm away from the office and don't have time to check your calculations. First thing to check is whether you have a thin column or not.

  • @manojrv2485
    @manojrv2485 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow. So neat and clear. Thank you!

  • @aliqan6258
    @aliqan6258 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    great demonstration. god bless you

  • @dalsenov
    @dalsenov 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very informative video! Thanks! One question:
    I plan to make a metal tubing construction and I want to run some numbers for the horizontal roof beams (the base of the roof trusses). As you gave the formula for "the critical buckling" that seems like a sort of limit, how do I calculate the real buckling value in order to compare it with the critical one?

  • @VIPAgnieszka
    @VIPAgnieszka 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant explanation!

  • @K0ffing
    @K0ffing 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey prof. why no deflections of beams/superposition videos??

  • @tripathilavkush
    @tripathilavkush 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you very much, sir..... Excellently explained.

  • @TheChikabum
    @TheChikabum 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    why don't we use the higher moment of inertia ? for stick 1 ?
    it would give a higher Pcritical, even higher than stick 2 provides.

  • @demanmania
    @demanmania 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    dear sir,
    can you please link between this and v.mises stress
    can we ignore buckling if we are using v.mises
    and what about plastic/inelastic design?

  • @MustangGTR2
    @MustangGTR2 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Prof, excellent videos, but Can you tell the difference between linear and non linear buckling ? thnks

  • @SampleroftheMultiverse
    @SampleroftheMultiverse 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    How does beam theory or thin sheet theory differ?

  • @johnyoung1611
    @johnyoung1611 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    how can I know if its global or local buckling ?

  • @zehra9499
    @zehra9499 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    when using SAP2000 to calculate Pcr, dividing the frame members makes the results change. why is it so? thank you...

  • @growgoodgetgood7875
    @growgoodgetgood7875 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you.your teaching is very useful. could you tell how to find the value of deflection at any point in the column under compressive force

  • @rramirezx8738
    @rramirezx8738 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good explanation, but I have a question, the critical load formula serves to determine the load to which the column buckles, But is there any formula or a way of knowing since the column has buckled, ?

    • @purdueMET
      @purdueMET  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      We generally assume that a column has little or no load carrying ability after it has buckled. There are some expressions for beam elements with large deformation that might work for buckled beams or columns.

  • @cadcamokulu
    @cadcamokulu 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about the non symmetric profile. we need to calculate Imin is that right

  • @tmtan1303
    @tmtan1303 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent!! Could you derive that equation?

  • @hasssankhattak5136
    @hasssankhattak5136 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir is it cmpulsry to take minimum moment of inertia ?

  • @crazyguru94
    @crazyguru94 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    if i want to design an eccentric loaded short column, is interaction formula better or secant formula is more suited?

    • @davidguerrero2703
      @davidguerrero2703 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      The secant formula would be more appropriate for an eccentric loaded column

  • @sharathshetty2807
    @sharathshetty2807 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    E=value is mentioned 800,000 psi is it right value or an assumption.
    what is the value considered for final computing the load

  • @TheWrinkleMan
    @TheWrinkleMan 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    if you pick the height for stick one to be 27mm then it's I will be greater than stick two. why?

  • @ram3nz
    @ram3nz 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi there thanks for the helpful video. I have a question about the Moment of Inertia equation though.[ I = (1/12)*b*h^3 ] How do we know which edge to use as base and which edge to use as height?

    • @Rayquesto
      @Rayquesto 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The axis for the area moment of inertia is sort of like the resistance of an area element from rotation (or just an point away from the axis). So, you use the distance^3 that would be in the direction perpendicular (or can think of it as away) from the axis of interest. You can think of the other distance multiplier as just adding a multiple amount of lines from the axis of interest with the same sort of rotation resisting value which in sum is the moment of inertia.

    • @nizamieminov3648
      @nizamieminov3648 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Ramen Van Trough Very good question and here is the very good answer : The rectangular cross section has two moments of inertia Ix and Iy. You must calculate both and select the smaller one. In this example h is 4 and b is 27.

  • @Ninjarni
    @Ninjarni 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    you find both, and give the minimum

  • @addieroxrev09
    @addieroxrev09 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    why didn't i get this in the lecture... but now i get it in just under 9 mins. ?
    strange..

  • @marioserrano5919
    @marioserrano5919 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    hi teacher, your videos are really good. could you please create a video about the difference between bending and bucking ?.
    it would be more great

  • @redrooster241
    @redrooster241 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    so what happens if you rotate the ruler stick cross-sectional shape by its axis 90 degrees so the value of I is greater?

    • @redrooster241
      @redrooster241 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Rusty Shackleford and then do the empirical test

    • @ramoserafini
      @ramoserafini 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Rusty Shackleford The moment of intertia (I) is calculated in the x and y directions, so if you rotate the ruler you would have Ix

    • @redrooster241
      @redrooster241 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes that makes sense. cheers

  • @ahsabhasan4118
    @ahsabhasan4118 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice explained

  • @danieljue3363
    @danieljue3363 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good!

  • @kristogf
    @kristogf 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much!

  • @pyr666
    @pyr666 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    suppose you were given a load and a factor of safety. how do those fit?

    • @msigala
      @msigala 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is taken into account if you are doing LRFD or ASD Assuming you are doing ASD then it would be 1.67. If you were in LRFD you would need to apply load factors to you loads I.E. dead and live.

  • @goliatt01
    @goliatt01 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very usefu, thank you!

  • @VibhorVerma28
    @VibhorVerma28 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice work.

  • @bogdanindeed225
    @bogdanindeed225 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!

  • @lemmereact7589
    @lemmereact7589 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks alot sir 💕

  • @sanjaykumavat6941
    @sanjaykumavat6941 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you.

  • @6devas6tation6
    @6devas6tation6 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    very helpful !! thanks !

  • @inzamahamed9828
    @inzamahamed9828 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    why only one side it's bending even both sides are same ex: a ruler bends in one direction

    • @inzamahamed9828
      @inzamahamed9828 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      why only one side is bending even both sides are same ex: a ruler bends in one direction if we apply compressive force

  • @barisevran7093
    @barisevran7093 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video ! :)

  • @maxalawal5654
    @maxalawal5654 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice.............................

  • @GreatGatling
    @GreatGatling 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Prof French put “meter” instead of “mm”

  • @challakishore6975
    @challakishore6975 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir

  • @aissarasaiamkhum3050
    @aissarasaiamkhum3050 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you very much ^^

  • @anonymooh
    @anonymooh 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    brilliant

  • @dailyenglishepisodes
    @dailyenglishepisodes 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Genius

  • @surajkupradhan1806
    @surajkupradhan1806 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank u sir

  • @attemptthis
    @attemptthis 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    the difference is due to the cross sectional area... cross sectional shape :|

  • @robframingham8835
    @robframingham8835 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    top video

  • @benji8861
    @benji8861 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    the cables are like this / || \

  • @jackiefelixart
    @jackiefelixart 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    umm good video but i think you made a small mistake with stick 1 with 4m should be 4 mm.

  • @isheanesuzimba4411
    @isheanesuzimba4411 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    better

  • @paritoshupadhyay8979
    @paritoshupadhyay8979 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir you are funny.

  • @materialsandstore8927
    @materialsandstore8927 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you make a mistake to write h=4m, but it is h=4mm

    • @barisevran7093
      @barisevran7093 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +sadrul hossain Are you serious ?
      h=4m, if you are Civil Eng. Im sure u can see its 4mm not 4m thickness ! jeeez !

  • @kumarvinayakmaurya4163
    @kumarvinayakmaurya4163 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wao budhe

  • @josinkz1
    @josinkz1 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good!

    • @purdueMET
      @purdueMET  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks. I'm glad you liked the video :-)