You seem like a really engaging, and compelling Teacher .You remind me of My teacher from Highschool Mr. Ahern. He made me look at education as a fundamental need of all humans instead of just work for no pay the knowledge was the pay. having me look at school that way changed my life looking at knowledge as currency which it most certainly is . Keep it up! We need more Teachers like you This is Great Content... Subscribed for sure.
Keith Hughes has been found guilty of contributing to the evolution of our minds. His motive was education, and his weapon was a straightforward, objective summary of a still contentious issue for some. His sentence will include more subscriptions and production of more videos.
Oh my god you are hilarious! I love your style, you are a great teacher. You remind me of a couple teachers I had back in highschool, keep up the good work :)
I’m not everyone’s cup of tea. Although I’d prefer to be a pistachio non dairy milk shake. Maybe made with coconut milk. Yeah. I’m gonna be a pistachio coconut “milk”shake. 🥥👉🏻🍃(pretend that’s pistachios)🥛👉🏻🧉
My friend goes to this "homechurch" that is supposed to be more casual and modern, and is mostly young people. She invited me a few times and I went even though I'm atheist (which she knows) because she wanted me to check it out. I got into a conversation with a girl and she brought up evolution without provocation and how she didn't believe "we come from monkeys, that's just stupid." I changed topics, because no way was I going to touch that. It made me realize that even though they were tatted, dreadlocked, millennials who smoked hookah and play drinking games after bible study, that didn't mean archaic ideas didn't linger beneath. Of course, just because you believe in a divine power, doesn't mean you have your head in the sand when it comes to science- the two are often murky in places, and may possibly overlap. Yet, old institutions harbor old ideas, and sometimes, there's just no escaping that.
I'm sorry for your bad experience with Christianity but I urge you to return, some legalistic Christians think you need to be perfect but God doesn't! He wants your failures and all to come to him and embrace your and my messiness for the betterment of his kingdom and im sur your friend thinks the same thing!
Tysm! I have to present a radio show, exactly how it would be in the 1920's (behind a curtain so nobody can see my group and I) and I chose the scopes trial, followed by flappers and cigarettes as my advertisement. This really helped me, thank you once again!
Great video, Professor Hughes (oh, and by the way, congratulations on getting a show on H2) Anyways, I always thought Hitchens said it best when he said that if people wanted "Intelligent Design" (such a stupid euphemism for creationism) taught in schools ("equal time") than any church that is tax exempt should teach evolution in their Sunday Schools. See their reaction when you tell a creationist that :-D.
Scientifically, life only comes from other living things. To say where the first life came from is conjecture based upon one’s world view. There are no scientific facts to back up spontaneous generation. Intelligent design (ID) would say that DNA (essential for life) is information, and information only comes from intelligence, therefore; life must have come from intelligence. Those hostile to the idea of ID say ID implies that God created life, there is no God, therefore; life sprang from non-living things. I would just like us to be honest. Leaving God out of your theory doesn’t make it scientific (observable, testable, repeatable), it only makes it secular. ID is also secular. It’s not God vs. Science, its one theory vs another.
hatfidd5 First of all, life is based in dna, rna, and proteins, however for dna to be synthesized rna must be present, therefor rna most likely predated dna, and rna molecules capable of polymerizing nucleotides have been created in lab conditions that were not only likely but highly probable long ago. More information needs to be found (and will be found i have no doubt) , but at this point it is extremely likely Elements, radiation, and chemistry are the culprits responsible for life. Even though abiogenesis has nothing to do with evolution which explains the diversification of species and genetic change over generations, since you commented on it I felt it deserved its own reply as well. Moving on to Evo. VS ID as "theories", ID has no scientific theory, it is almost entirely speculative and suffers from confirmation bias as well considering it is based on christian mythology. Mythology is a traditional or legendary story or stories that usually portray a hero of some sort or multiple hero's and their rise and sometimes fall as well. Evolution however, is a scientific theory based on multiple laws and other theories that explain natural phenomena and have been repeatedly tested, scrutinized, and submitted for empirical review, and still found to be true. Since ID is unable to deliver a similar set of ideas that have been tested, retested and found to be true, and as i said before is almost entire speculative, it is unable to stand up to evolution as a likely scientific theory, and unless it produces more testable data over time, it never will. My bet is on the fact that it never will. I do not want to try to take someones faith away or challenge their faith. I believe individual dogma can still accept evolution without betraying beliefs, and although i am an atheist, many non atheist scientists agree with my previous statement. Evolution is based on facts, therefore is fact, and nothing else has ever been proposed as a theory that has the same amount of overwhelming evidence based on empirical data to be able to stand up to it, much less, be proposed as an opposing theory.
Today, any scientific paper immediately comes under peer review before it hits the public. Question: How many years did evolution as a teaching exist without peer review? Was this the first peer review so to speak?
Wasn't the law not to forbid the teaching of evolution, but to forbid the evolution of man from ancestor. I heard you could teach that animals could have evolved or changed . But not man. Could you clarify that. Or state the actual wording of the LAW.
hatfidd5 Never said what I found great about it. The accuracy of any bio movie as it relates to real life is not what I intended as great but thanks for sharing!!
gnewt75 I won't deny it was great propaganda. It worked wonderfully. The Keith Hughes video was about history, it is unfortunate that people relate the historical event to the movie you mentioned. That’s all I was saying.
Because it spread the message nationwide and the testimony of Bryan was ridiculed in the news. So the overall effect was the diminishing of creationism as a legitimate scientific explanation for human beings.
@@tigercap100 LOL. That's what the creationists think. Evolution does not tell that black pigmented skin people are less evolved. It is the creationist christians who believe that the sons of ham(imaginary guy), the son of noah(another imaginary guy) were cursed by god(another imaginary guy) and meant to be subjugated. That is what makes creationist christians *actually* racist.
You mean creation science versus pseudoscience has nothing to do with religion it has to do with comprehension that every seed produces after its kind and everything produces after its kind where with in order to continue life cycles of each individual life for whether it be kingdom phylum class order family genus species each has a process to which a male an a female procreates in order to its kind.
Thank you for this video. I disagree we are moving towards a science education though, rather a more of a politically correct touchy Feely kinda of education now.
This guy explains how they lost the case doesnt matter. But this is how it happened. The prosecutor took the stand, and was fully ready to defend the Bible. The defense, at that point after a lengthy trial stood up and claim guilty. The prosecutor could not defend his case properly prove the Bible over evolution. The guilty plea shut the prosecutor up. That wouldnt matter to people this host claims. The prosecutor that saved the best for last, could not present his case, and died shortly. Evil won that day pleading guilty. From that point on this science which has no evidence is the type of science America is pushing on the world. There is no evidence on any link, that grass is a human ancestor, or that cows became whales. Or Kissing a frog, and it turns into a human.
Have either of you ever read the Bible, I think not. If you had, you'd see the distinct relationship between the two. And frankly s t1, I don't care what you believe, arguing by swearing and insulting is only effective when used against complete and totally idiotic illiterate wimps like yourself. if you'd like to have a actual debate, please do continue. Otherwise, leave.
Marco Fiorello I'm sorry but in what way is evolution compatible with genesis saying that god created mankind separately from all other creatures? How is science consistent with donkeys and snakes talking? Virgins giving birth? 30 year old carpenters dying and coming back to life? A giant flood over the whole planet and then all of that water just somehow disappearing within a matter of months? If you think science and the bible are compatible, I'd love it if you could explain in what way, because so far it's not looking good for you.
At the end of the video, you say we are going towards a more scientific way of teaching instead of teaching biblical. The Bible has multiple places where it talks about science, for example, it talks about the water cycles many times. It wasn't really biblical VS science more like Evolution VS Christianity/Bible. Also, Evolution is a theory, and now in days, they teach it as FACT. That's my problem with the school system. They explain things as FACT instead of theory. Also, I can agree the Bible is a theory too.
Frμ1T It’s taught as fact because it’s the best model we have to explain the diversity in species. It also builds on multiple facets of knowledge, yes the model can change in the future, but for now it’s Darwin’s original theory
Paul Dana I love how I’m the idiot, and you don’t even know me. A theory can never be considered a fact, because in fact it is a “theory.” If a theory was a fact, everything not proven would be considered true. Have a blessed day.😌
Paul Dana Spend time in the library? Do you talk to everyone you don’t know like this? You should spend time fixing your attitude, and then we can have a proper conversation ma’am. Thank you.😌
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 85 | คู่เอก "ยอดเหล็กเพชร vs ผึ้งหลวง"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Qq_19bnnxEo/mqdefault.jpg)
You seem like a really engaging, and compelling Teacher .You remind me of My teacher from Highschool Mr. Ahern. He made me look at education as a fundamental need of all humans instead of just work for no pay the knowledge was the pay. having me look at school that way changed my life looking at knowledge as currency which it most certainly is . Keep it up! We need more Teachers like you This is Great Content... Subscribed for sure.
+Ricky Warren Thanks for the kind words Ricky. Glad to have you and Board!
I need ten pages though lol
Zelios 2 years later...
Did you ever finish those 10 pages? Lol
@@masongalioth4110 I'm wondering the same thing
Mason Galioth The world will never know
@@kevincruz8763 never
david mamchits ever
Keith Hughes has been found guilty of contributing to the evolution of our minds. His motive was education, and his weapon was a straightforward, objective summary of a still contentious issue for some. His sentence will include more subscriptions and production of more videos.
I Am Leg.
I Am Arm
I Am Hand.
Why do you apparently believe we have undergone such speciation in the past?
Oh my god you are hilarious! I love your style, you are a great teacher. You remind me of a couple teachers I had back in highschool, keep up the good work :)
I’m not everyone’s cup of tea. Although I’d prefer to be a pistachio non dairy milk shake. Maybe made with coconut milk. Yeah. I’m gonna be a pistachio coconut “milk”shake. 🥥👉🏻🍃(pretend that’s pistachios)🥛👉🏻🧉
My friend goes to this "homechurch" that is supposed to be more casual and modern, and is mostly young people. She invited me a few times and I went even though I'm atheist (which she knows) because she wanted me to check it out. I got into a conversation with a girl and she brought up evolution without provocation and how she didn't believe "we come from monkeys, that's just stupid." I changed topics, because no way was I going to touch that. It made me realize that even though they were tatted, dreadlocked, millennials who smoked hookah and play drinking games after bible study, that didn't mean archaic ideas didn't linger beneath. Of course, just because you believe in a divine power, doesn't mean you have your head in the sand when it comes to science- the two are often murky in places, and may possibly overlap. Yet, old institutions harbor old ideas, and sometimes, there's just no escaping that.
I'm sorry for your bad experience with Christianity but I urge you to return, some legalistic Christians think you need to be perfect but God doesn't! He wants your failures and all to come to him and embrace your and my messiness for the betterment of his kingdom and im sur your friend thinks the same thing!
Amen
Well said brother.
"ITS CURRENT YEAR"
Tysm! I have to present a radio show, exactly how it would be in the 1920's (behind a curtain so nobody can see my group and I) and I chose the scopes trial, followed by flappers and cigarettes as my advertisement. This really helped me, thank you once again!
Great video ! Keep up the good work.
Nice video.. As part of Clarences lineage, Im proud of the Darrow contribution to this country since 1675
Hawkeyes life really took a turn for the worse
Great video, Professor Hughes (oh, and by the way, congratulations on getting a show on H2) Anyways, I always thought Hitchens said it best when he said that if people wanted "Intelligent Design" (such a stupid euphemism for creationism) taught in schools ("equal time") than any church that is tax exempt should teach evolution in their Sunday Schools. See their reaction when you tell a creationist that :-D.
Scientifically, life only comes from other living things. To say where the first life came from is conjecture based upon one’s world view. There are no scientific facts to back up spontaneous generation. Intelligent design (ID) would say that DNA (essential for life) is information, and information only comes from intelligence, therefore; life must have come from intelligence. Those hostile to the idea of ID say ID implies that God created life, there is no God, therefore; life sprang from non-living things. I would just like us to be honest. Leaving God out of your theory doesn’t make it scientific (observable, testable, repeatable), it only makes it secular. ID is also secular. It’s not God vs. Science, its one theory vs another.
hatfidd5 First of all, life is based in dna, rna, and proteins, however for dna to be synthesized rna must be present, therefor rna most likely predated dna, and rna molecules capable of polymerizing nucleotides have been created in lab conditions that were not only likely but highly probable long ago. More information needs to be found (and will be found i have no doubt) , but at this point it is extremely likely Elements, radiation, and chemistry are the culprits responsible for life. Even though abiogenesis has nothing to do with evolution which explains the diversification of species and genetic change over generations, since you commented on it I felt it deserved its own reply as well. Moving on to Evo. VS ID as "theories", ID has no scientific theory, it is almost entirely speculative and suffers from confirmation bias as well considering it is based on christian mythology. Mythology is a traditional or legendary story or stories that usually portray a hero of some sort or multiple hero's and their rise and sometimes fall as well. Evolution however, is a scientific theory based on multiple laws and other theories that explain natural phenomena and have been repeatedly tested, scrutinized, and submitted for empirical review, and still found to be true. Since ID is unable to deliver a similar set of ideas that have been tested, retested and found to be true, and as i said before is almost entire speculative, it is unable to stand up to evolution as a likely scientific theory, and unless it produces more testable data over time, it never will. My bet is on the fact that it never will. I do not want to try to take someones faith away or challenge their faith. I believe individual dogma can still accept evolution without betraying beliefs, and although i am an atheist, many non atheist scientists agree with my previous statement. Evolution is based on facts, therefore is fact, and nothing else has ever been proposed as a theory that has the same amount of overwhelming evidence based on empirical data to be able to stand up to it, much less, be proposed as an opposing theory.
Today, any scientific paper immediately comes under peer review before it hits the public. Question: How many years did evolution as a teaching exist without peer review? Was this the first peer review so to speak?
Man, I wish I had this in high school.
You kind of look like my dad.
Wasn't the law not to forbid the teaching of evolution, but to forbid the evolution of man from ancestor. I heard you could teach that animals could have evolved or changed . But not man. Could you clarify that. Or state the actual wording of the LAW.
bruh what is the subtitles
I cringed a little but the video did actually contain some good information.
Zappy Cat 818 lol same
Change in the 1920s and here we are again fighting for change 100 years later
Inherit the Wind.....great movie. Must see!!!
hatfidd5 Never said what I found great about it. The accuracy of any bio movie as it relates to real life is not what I intended as great but thanks for sharing!!
gnewt75 I won't deny it was great propaganda. It worked wonderfully. The Keith Hughes video was about history, it is unfortunate that people relate the historical event to the movie you mentioned. That’s all I was saying.
I'm a bit confused, if he was found guilty, how was this trial specifically significant in overturning the law?
Because it spread the message nationwide and the testimony of Bryan was ridiculed in the news. So the overall effect was the diminishing of creationism as a legitimate scientific explanation for human beings.
Keith Hughes Ah ok, that's very interesting. Thank you very much.
Cuppa Joe evolutionists are racist. they believe blacks are less evolved
I Am Leg.
@@tigercap100 LOL. That's what the creationists think. Evolution does not tell that black pigmented skin people are less evolved. It is the creationist christians who believe that the sons of ham(imaginary guy), the son of noah(another imaginary guy) were cursed by god(another imaginary guy) and meant to be subjugated. That is what makes creationist christians *actually* racist.
helped me with my homework and I aced it
The excessive blinking is distracting.
Patton Oswald lost weight!
Isn't beleif in evolution a religion?
You mean creation science versus pseudoscience has nothing to do with religion it has to do with comprehension that every seed produces after its kind and everything produces after its kind where with in order to continue life cycles of each individual life for whether it be kingdom phylum class order family genus species each has a process to which a male an a female procreates in order to its kind.
Patton Oswald...???
First time seeing a video of yours. Very good interview' but i expected to learn a little bit more or get a little bit more dialouge at least
I Am Leg.
wasn't the main argue and prove of evolution proven to me doctored? Nebraska man
Thank you for this video. I disagree we are moving towards a science education though, rather a more of a politically correct touchy Feely kinda of education now.
Of course it happened in the backwards south!
Excuse me but I’m from North Carolina and I resent you for call the South backwards!!🤬🤬🤬🤬
Jesus is Lord
This guy explains how they lost the case doesnt matter. But this is how it happened. The prosecutor took the stand, and was fully ready to defend the Bible. The defense, at that point after a lengthy trial stood up and claim guilty. The prosecutor could not defend his case properly prove the Bible over evolution. The guilty plea shut the prosecutor up. That wouldnt matter to people this host claims. The prosecutor that saved the best for last, could not present his case, and died shortly. Evil won that day pleading guilty. From that point on this science which has no evidence is the type of science America is pushing on the world. There is no evidence on any link, that grass is a human ancestor, or that cows became whales. Or Kissing a frog, and it turns into a human.
Hughes doesn't seem confident about what he is talking about. And for the record, the Bible and science are compatible, not separate.
How are two parties with completely different reasoning methods in any way compatible?
Lol they're compatible if you're willing to cherry pick instead of being a consistent human being
Have either of you ever read the Bible, I think not. If you had, you'd see the distinct relationship between the two. And frankly s t1, I don't care what you believe, arguing by swearing and insulting is only effective when used against complete and totally idiotic illiterate wimps like yourself. if you'd like to have a actual debate, please do continue. Otherwise, leave.
Marco Fiorello
I'm sorry but in what way is evolution compatible with genesis saying that god created mankind separately from all other creatures? How is science consistent with donkeys and snakes talking? Virgins giving birth? 30 year old carpenters dying and coming back to life? A giant flood over the whole planet and then all of that water just somehow disappearing within a matter of months?
If you think science and the bible are compatible, I'd love it if you could explain in what way, because so far it's not looking good for you.
Marco Fiorello They R Definitely Not Compatible! u tell me where in the bible it says that Humans Came from the apes of the random Big Bang. -_-
At the end of the video, you say we are going towards a more scientific way of teaching instead of teaching biblical. The Bible has multiple places where it talks about science, for example, it talks about the water cycles many times. It wasn't really biblical VS science more like Evolution VS Christianity/Bible. Also, Evolution is a theory, and now in days, they teach it as FACT. That's my problem with the school system. They explain things as FACT instead of theory. Also, I can agree the Bible is a theory too.
Frμ1T It’s taught as fact because it’s the best model we have to explain the diversity in species. It also builds on multiple facets of knowledge, yes the model can change in the future, but for now it’s Darwin’s original theory
@Paul Dana How can it be a theory and, a fact at the same time?
Paul Dana I love how I’m the idiot, and you don’t even know me. A theory can never be considered a fact, because in fact it is a “theory.” If a theory was a fact, everything not proven would be considered true. Have a blessed day.😌
Paul Dana Spend time in the library? Do you talk to everyone you don’t know like this? You should spend time fixing your attitude, and then we can have a proper conversation ma’am. Thank you.😌
Paul Dana You realize Evolution is a theory still right? It’s not fact but schools teach it as fact. There are many things that can’t be proven.