The worst thing is that there are hundreds of "historical" channels on TH-cam and on the rest of the social medias created entirely by AI - pictures, narration, info, that spread misinformation and make a lot of money from viewership.
You don't even know what AI really is. You just listen to others who say they do and believe them. AI is currently a buzzword for ignorant people, not programmers in artificial intelligence. Turn cynical and lose the propaganda BS 🤚💩😞 your chewing. Start by getting rid of this dumb woman.
@@ManuelRomero-h7b You can also report accounts or videos for misinformation. I can't help wondering if there might be cause enough for someone to make a Discord server for historians where video links etc can be posted so that they might be reviewed and then reported if they're found to be sufficiently incorrect, since social media companies only seem to take down posts that are reported multiple times for the same reason.
@@Revenant_Art History is always rewritten by those who don't want everyone to understand the truth. But want people to agree with their propaganda. For example: Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Idi Amin, Putin, General Franco, Fernando Marcos, Mao Tse Tong, the Chinese Communist Party, Democrats, Republicans, Pastors, Rabbis, Priests, Mulahs, Presidents, Emperor's, Kings, Queens, Dictators, MSNBC hosts, CNN hosts, Fox News hosts, corporate CEOs, bankers, lawyers, judges, insurance people, real estate people, police, firemen, politicians, bureaucrats, family, neighbors, etc. a All telling you what to believe usually because you're too dumb to use your own brain well enough and need to be told. The corrupt leading the dumb. You know, Democrats. 😞🤔🧐💯👍
29:01 "The English said they should get to be King of France because It's not fair and mom said I can have a turn" is just so hilariously on point for the initial dispute I had to pause the video to laugh.
The problem with that statement is that she calls them English and French not the trivialisation of the motivation. That's very much what set off the conflict. But to refer to them as nations is a bit dubious. This conflict is the beginning of the journey towards becoming nations rather than random wealthy families that spoke the same language in both areas and possessed land in both areas.
@@lyalldawson7080 No, that’s Guyenne/Aquitaine. The claim to the French throne was derived through Isabella the She-Wolf, French princess and mother of Edward III.
@@danvernier198 I think the reason they're called "England" and "France" even today is mainly because it's easier for people to understand the conflict with such terms. If you had to say "The land that would soon become England" every time you talked about it, it would get very cumbersome, very fast.
AI is worrisome. I hate its dehumanising gassing of humanity while time after time Ai plays better at impersonating evil over good. How dare tech hold so much self importance over us all, we're the beings of consciousness here, not the damn toasters.
@burtlangoustine1 It definitely dehumanizing to human history, it's adds this touch of disconnect where people could potentially forget the greatness of people by not featuring the locations, clothes, and art of those times, and uses bad cartoon like depictions of real people that have no basis in historical records or anything like that, just other similar pictures. Ai totally sucks in a historical framework!
The problem I have with badly created AI images is not with the image itself. It's when someone sees a badly created AI image and it doesn't click in their brain that it's fake and they share it raving about how amazing it is.
@larrykelly-kf5pp sometimes both. A bot puts it on there to begin with, and then people share it because they like the pictures. Then there's always at least one person who thinks that it's actually something real and shares it to try and find out where to buy one despite the fact that it looks like a cartoon.......
@ I worry that in critiquing we’re just training young Albert to do better while we try to protect vulnerable people. 🤔 Hard to know but I guess we’ll work it out eventually
@DBProductions12345-m An example of what I mean is I've seen a site that sells plants. The images are clearly AI and not the actual plants. People comment on "how beautiful" and "how amazing" and when someone posts a picture of the actual plant or points this out, the comment gets deleted half the time. Unless the positive comments are made by bots, too, to bring up the popularity?🤔
Wow, never would have guessed Dr. Janega speaks Czech. I would love her review the historical accuracy of Kingdom Come Deliverance game or it's upcoming sequel, should be right up her alley!
Yes, this! Especially since it's centered around Kutna Hora which was, at the time, one of the biggest and richest cities and a huge competitor to Prague, because it was one of the hot spots for mining silver. I've you've never been there and happen to be in Czechia, please visit. Kutna Hora is beautiful and it also has a very famous ossuary: Sedlec.
@@richardjakobek7477 True for the claim being stronger but Alienor was also the great-great-great grandaughter of Robert 2, the second capetian king who ruled between 996 and 1031 so she had royal blood (Robert's grandaughter married Alienor's great grandfather aka Guilhem 8). Nevertheless, Edward 3's claim was still the weakest of the three main pretendant (Edward 3, Philippe 6 and Philippe of Burgundy) after Charles 4's death, either it was because he wasn't from a male line unlike Philippe 6 or because by female line, he was from Charles 4's younger sister (Isabelle) line unlike Philippe of Burgundy who was from Charles 4's older brother (Philippe 5) line. The irony of this claim by female line is that when it happened in England in 1399, the lancaster dynasty who was the oldest male line alive from Edward 3 take the throne to Edmund Mortimer who was the heir by the eldest line (Lionel of Antwerp) but it was also a female line (by Philippa of Clarence, Lionel's daughter)
I remember when they said AI would make life easier, reduce mundane tasks. Instead all we get is it stealing artists work and doing a bad interpretation of it.
I went to high school in the late 70s here in Britain and our teachers told us when the new technology came in we would all; have extra leisure time, all be rich there would be no need for masses of paperwork as offices would be paperless and machines would do all the hard physical labour 🙄. Now nearly 50 years on and none of it has come true. People work longer hours, for less money, paperwork is still duplicated despite also being on computer systems and apart from Roomba vacuums we still have to do manual tasks.
@@nigeh5326 Well it turns out that technology is "neutral". In other words. It can be used for good and improving lives. But it can be also used to deepen the wealth inequality and increase social issues. The industrial revolution is a perfect example for this. When it happend, it was terrible for the majoritiy of people. Labour and agriculture suffered greatly and it took several generations to get out of it. Once that was over though the benefits of it started to come in which we still see even to this day. But this idea that technology has always like inherently lead to improvements? I believe that's wrong.
& spending 10x as long trying to find the right results on search engines. I still cant believe this shit was easier when i had to concurrently use Netscape, Webscape, Jeeves & company
"all we get"? ::sigh:: what you describe as "all we get" is the barest, tiniest, fraction of the tip of the AI iceberg. if that's "all" you're getting from AI (hint: it isn't), you're doing life wrong
Agreed! Eleanor often speaks of being a Prague specialist and I love to learn of things I am not well educated on. As an American, please teach me something I don’t know about one of the most influential and powerful regimes in history.
@@martavdz4972 Bohemia, of which Prague was the capital (at least in the 19th century) belonged to the Austro-Hungarian empire for 300 years. The other part of modern-day Czechia is Moravia. Czechia has really interesting and well-documented history.
Thanks for speaking out about this trend. It is up to the content producers to care enough about what is in their videos to look at the images they accept and learn enough about the subject to know if those images are accurate. I have to skip over bad ones all the time.
To be fair, you don't even have to know the era to know a picture's done by AI. Just look at the details shown - the cloaks that grow out of the clothing worn under it, the OMG nightmare fuels hands or blank stares, the thing that has wheels on two adjacent sides and nowhere to hitch a horse or ox - there are so many things that give AI pictures away to anyone who spends even a moment looking at them. The issue is, really, that people don't know how to think critically about things any more. AI was supposed to take over the boring mundane things so that people had time to be creative, not take over the creative stuff so that people had more time for boring mundane chores.
The Monty Python clips dish so hard. 👨🍳💋 Yes, even a low budget 70s absurd comedy featuring men pretending to ride horses can be arsed to do better research than your AI.
Her comment was a glib anachronism and wrong. Henry VIII headed a tenuous dynasty that had a meagre thread of legitimacy and many domestic enemies. That he renounced his & the nation's faith - to become defender of the faith as the monarch still is, in order to preserve his dynasty, is about temporal power.
@@peterworwood6483 confirmation bias does not prove an argument, not from 500 years later. He was the English state & state power affords considerable extension of action in its retention.
I saw an AI christmas advert being advertised by a legitimate company Opendoor which I presumed is run by people with eyes in which the Turkey had 7 legs! On a side note the laziness and greed of these companies knows no bounds.
I saw a populist party in my country, with a fairly large following no less, use AI to depict a perfect, white heterosexual family (somehow they were all blonde too), all of them with 6+ fingers. Do you think any of their followers actually cared?
Toyota and Coke also made Christmas AI ads and they look horrendous, the "art" is constantly morphing in the background and it looks like it's actively rotting, no clue why these billion-dollar companies thought that was ok to do
Ok but I WOULD LOVE a multipart series on medieval Prague/Bohemia/Holy Roman Empire!! I feel like it was confusing in school so I just skipped it. But the drama of 7 guys electing the emperor? Dr Janega would absolutely rock it!!
@@Peaches_Montclaire Just two examples: Her claim about no f**e-wea**ns is complete false, they did exist. And how she is making fun of n*bility taking part in f**hts. There was a very good reason why they did it. That she does not know this is just embarassing. Sorry for the spelling, but that's the only way you will be able to see it.
Funnyly enough - or not so funny after all - the AI isn't doing a worse job than her. She is ignorant and a lot of her statements are absurd and a bad joke.
I needed this, I just spent like 2 weeks trying to research medieval tavern architecture for a painting, and I only found people selling what they think looks medieval based on vibes, or ai image garbage. The roast was necessary for all the rage I dealt with
Magna Carta obviously wrong because it wasn’t signed half way down. When asked ‘where was Magna Carta signed?’, every English schoolboy responds “at the bottom of the page.”
That's so true. And then a clever clogs kid tells everyone they didn't sign it at all, the put their wax seals on it. The King's seal was the bigliest, obviously.
Well, the practice of the time is that the stamp on the seal hanging from the document is what legitimises it. So both the middle and the bottom are equally wrong, the name would have been written by a scribe near the top and the stamp in the wax blob hanging from the paper would have been the equivalent of a "signature".
The Lindisfarne example also ignores the fact that the monastery ruins are to be found in the present day village, two-thirds of a mile to the west of the castle and on the opposite side of the harbour, not next to it as in the AI cartoon.
I wouldn’t include Janega in that list, she makes the others look bad. Saying guns not exisiting in medieval times???? Simply inaccurate. Saying kings fighting with their men is stupid? By modern standards yeah, but using modern lens to judge history is a poor frame of reference, Alexander the Great for example fought with his men, it showed a level of devotion and provided a morale boost. Today’s leaders would never set foot on the battlefield but that’s modern sensibilities.
@@samjones7900 Kings fighting with their men *is* stupid from the point of view that it makes them incredibly vulnerable which she demonstrated by discussing the deaths of Harold and Richard the Lionheart. Yes, it does have some benefits but that doesn't mean you aren't gambling with some very large downsides like, for example, the breaking of your army at Hastings giving William the upper hand in his conquest of England.
"Medieval people thought being bald was sexy" - somehow I am halfway into building a time machine to go get a weird form of the plague because I was too thirsty.
Yeah, I feel your pain. AI is doing my head in too. Especially You Tube thumbnails. If I see one more picture for a Roman Legionary who looks more like a Spartan from the film 300 I shall scream and not be held responsible for my future actions. I mean, we all worried about the future picture in the Terminator films, but we certainly didn't see this nightmare coming.
Don't know how I didn't know you were a Prague-ophile Dr Janega (considering how much of your content I have watched), but that just makes you rock even more in my eyes!! My favourite city in the world. Love the history, love the architecture, love the ambience and love the people 🙂
หลายเดือนก่อน +21
Bro, wake up! New medieval torture method just dropped! (Except this only works on medievalists.)
This was hilarious… great video for a long drive! Fun fact: a bishop’s hat is called a mitre, at least today in the Catholic Church. Either in this period It was different, or she was referring to the papal tiara, which only the pope wore, not any other bishop.
@ I used it simply because she used it to describe the bishop’s hat in the video. Also, you would do well to stop using the concept of hell so frivolously. Peace.
It's quite funny being able to see exactly which kinds of images the AI used to make every single one of these. You tell it " please depict historically accurate medieval prague" And it goes "Right on chief, let me just butcher someone's medieval fantasy city concept art real quick." People think AI can somehow create things beyond human capability. Just cause you know. It smart robot, it steal all the art.
I once got Ancient Egypt with... excavators in the background. And people like to convince me that AI is smarter than most humans. No human would have done that unless it was deliberate (like a time-travel scenario or something along those lines), which the AI model definitely wasn't trying to do.
I'm a translator with three languages, have also translated movies and books, and having to quit after 18 years due to crappy machine translations. "Infuriating" doesn't cover it.
Was the Joan of Arc picture pulling from US puritan witch trials? That would account for some of the severe dress and everyone wearing almost the same thing. While I didn't believe everyone dressed identically at that time either, they did dress in a more similar way.
I think another issue is also not one thing AI produces is new, it is just an amalgamation of data put into it. All these images look so familiar. It is creating nothing new, stagnating and regressing art.
Aren't humans just an amalgamation of our experiences? Why is "true novelty" the benchmark for artistic greatness here? Is there a correlation where fewer common elements an art piece has, the better it is? Data itself might not be new, but there are endless number of ways to arrange it. Child grown in absolute darkness with no experiences would not make for a great artist. Inspiration and vision aren't willed by the soul into existence from the ether.
@@MidWitPride Sounds convincing in theory. In actuall practice though, AI is 100% making the art world stagnate and regress, it's been a shitshow for the last two years. It is based on theft, and nothing original comes out of it. And AI-bros can only get "likes" if they show something derivative of something that people like already anyways (like fake paintings "in the style of X"). The only thing achieved by generative AI so far is enabling art fraudsters to prompt an image, copy it "by numbers" onto canvas and sell that through naive local galleries who don't have a clue.
This video is gold! I'm new to HistoryHit, but I'm addicted. Also, I never turn down an Eleanor video! This one though, cracked me up, but also is so loaded with facts. Please make more!
AI is not worth the money and technology we have put into it, I fail to see how AI creates a better anything. AI doesnt depict humans as they are not human, just a blobby outline of what maybe looks like the form of a human if you look very far away. Dont like the AI but love Eleanor! She makes medieval history so much fun and accessible! I'm a subscriber of HH and this channel and I would love to see more docus/videos with her in it!
AI is useful in technology, medicine and law. Whoever thought of using it in humanities, though... Humanities involve emotions, morality and aesthetics. As far as I know, AI is about as familiar with them as a caterpillar is with the planet Jupiter.
We weren't really TV people but this was kinda like watching a movie with my parents. "Oh, for godssake - men didn't wear shirts with attached collars then." or "Look at her, unbound hair and make-up! She would have been run out of town!" etc. I rather think that's why I became an historian.
@@AmperSand666 It'd be more impressive if I hadn't been hearing that last year. That said, I'm less scared of AI than I am the clowns who are running the companies that are trying to invent it. AI should be a national project, overseen by the government, transparently run with the interest of the public in mind. Not the vanity projects of spoiled and entitled rich boys. We've been here before with social media, and look how that turned out.
Beyond the humor involved, this is a very productive discussion to be having around nascent AI. The mismatch that is obvious to the specialist but hidden to most others under a kind of 'confidence' that AI presents all its outputs, particularly images of this nature. More of this kind of content is only likely to rise and it's nice to see a presentation of that AI-Human exchange as centering the importance of human knowledge, understanding and nuance as critical. Dr. Janega's generous thought experiments on behalf of the AI are particularly helpful and I imagine very accurate to the flow of neural network encoding. Maybe because any academic has an understanding with the hyper-intelligent child-student that an AI can be conceived as, but certainly because of her innate empathy even amid the same kind of sharp wit that makes these videos enjoyable at the expense of technological fumblings forward. 🤖🦄🤖
I could happily spend a week wandering around historic Britain with Dr Janega as long as we could spend the evenings in bars drinking and talking about how bloody awful many monarchs were. Cheers Doctor Janega 👍🏴
The AI art shown was not something I was personally into, but the segment with William the Conqueror around time-tagged at 26:28 minutes in with the depiction of some of the old intact art pieces, I did like that; I enjoyed the overall historical explanations that Dr. Eleanor Janega provided when she explained each period of historical reference that the AI art attempted to depict.
I asked Chatbot to create an image of Dr. Eleanor Janega as a medieval historian at work. They ended up looking a lot like the AI image of Eleanor of Aquitaine although she had eyeglasses and a pen in each hand!
Dr Eleanor Janega is... the mother I never had. she is the sister everybody would want. she is the friend that everybody deserves. I don't know a better person.
I thought the first one was the Rock of Cashel at first, but of course not on an island. Edited to add that if this is what happens when you put Dr. Janega in front of a camera and let her go off script, please let her do it more often.
I enjoy history and I really enjoy your videos. History isn't dates and names, it's people. You do a very good job of talking about the people and making them live (in a manner of speaking) again. And let me say that I would absolutely love to watch a video where you took a drink every time they screwed something up. The humor when you were three sheets to the wind would be epic and hilarious.
As a public historian of a different time period, I completely understand the pain, Dr Janega! I swear these AI images are pretty much the same as the general public's perception of history, no matter what time period we're talking about. Thank you for enduring it for our entertainment.😄
Ok I was so distracted by how lovely Eleanor was I had to go back and rewatch the beginning. Great idea for a video! I think of this whenever I see a weird AI thumbnail for a history video.
Very pro this Eleanor reacts style - the fashion tier lists were great, if you decide against further torture. But I'd be up for asking AI historical questions and making fun of its answers too.
I love this woman. She is incredibly smart, and presents in a way that is entertaining. I look forward to her content. History taught, and told the way it should be.👍
Despite making fun of the worst thing ever invented in my lifetime, this video was also super informative and educational. Upvote and please make more!
Fairly famously Agincourt did have a couple of guns (to no effect). But nothing handheld, you would call them cannon nowadays, and they would have fired hand-chipped gunstones and not cannonballs.
Your comment about knowing how Americans think because you have been cursed cracked me up 😂-I definitely feel your pain! BTW, love listening to you & Matt on Gone Medieval.
My favourite explanation of the 100-years war. "is when the English decided that they should get to be kings of France because it's not fair and mom said they could have a turn".
2:28 Why aren't those buildings so colorful anymore if they are not abandoned? For example churches that are still in use, why are they not repainted throughout Europe?
A LOT of churches in Europe are colourful. It depends on the country, the region (poor or rich), the time period (some mediaeval churches genuinely never had been painted, but from the 16th century onwards, most of them were). And it also depends on the money. There are hundreds of thousands of churches in Europe and they need to be reconstructed by experts, which costs money that the Catholic or Lutheran or whichever church doesn't always have. There are hundreds of crowdfunding campaigns going on in my country to repair and re-paint churches, and it usually takes 10-20 years to put together the millions and millions that are needed.
Also want to point out that for a lot of churches, it took decades or even centuries to build them. The monastery in my town was built over the course of 80 years. They're massive and require the work of hundreds of artisans and highly educated experts. So it's not a surprise that it takes decades to repair them after wars, natural catastrophes or economic decline when there was no money to keep the building spic and span. Also, the Catholic and other churches have less money nowadays.
The real reason is that we usually try to conserve, not to rebuild. I mean how would you repaint a church? We know a lot, but we also don't know it exactly. We learned that the hard way in the periods of Historicism or the Romantic Era in the 19th century, where a lot of medieval castles were rebuild. But they did make a lot of errors, because they didn't know better and now we have some weird amalgamation of periods that isn't historically accurate. You could ask that about a lot of other buildings too, why is the Forum Romanum in Rome not rebuild, why the Egyptian Pyramids, the Temple of Zeus etc. ? Before you do it wrong, you better don't do it at all. That's why.
The thing about AI is that its just an aggressive search engine with the ability to make pretty pictures. You have to remember at all times that AI is not definitive. It is not absolute. Junk in junk out.
Oh, Eleanor, don't hate me, but I want like 75 more of these with you. I love your good natured irritation and I always love the way you discuss the different facets of history. More! More! Just don't give the poor woman anything else to do with Prague. 😘
I completely agree on the fact that the AI is definitely not a tool for Historical and Knowledge Preservation, but you're telling some severe false assertion too though, and it's irritating, but I need to keep it civilised. However, It's insulting on various deep levels. As such, please, people, go check Metathron reacting to this video to have a clearer and truthful view about certain topics treated here... Although it's not on the full video, of course, it's enough to understand, and to not buy misleading/false/not completely correct/etc...information that has been said here.
I rather enjoyed this!! Great topic for a video. I love Dr. Yanega's presentation. My favourite piece here was the history of Thomas St Beckett. I first heard this name in a reference by Benjamin Franklin on the HBO John Adams show and I tried to look it up myself but the history I was reading confused me more. With this little snippet it made so much more sense thank you 🙏🏽❤
The worst thing is that there are hundreds of "historical" channels on TH-cam and on the rest of the social medias created entirely by AI - pictures, narration, info, that spread misinformation and make a lot of money from viewership.
You don't even know what AI really is. You just listen to others who say they do and believe them. AI is currently a buzzword for ignorant people, not programmers in artificial intelligence.
Turn cynical and lose the propaganda BS 🤚💩😞 your chewing. Start by getting rid of this dumb woman.
Yep ... I block ALOT.
@@ManuelRomero-h7b You can also report accounts or videos for misinformation. I can't help wondering if there might be cause enough for someone to make a Discord server for historians where video links etc can be posted so that they might be reviewed and then reported if they're found to be sufficiently incorrect, since social media companies only seem to take down posts that are reported multiple times for the same reason.
@@Revenant_Art History is always rewritten by those who don't want everyone to understand the truth. But want people to agree with their propaganda.
For example:
Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Idi Amin, Putin, General Franco, Fernando Marcos, Mao Tse Tong, the Chinese Communist Party, Democrats, Republicans, Pastors, Rabbis, Priests, Mulahs, Presidents, Emperor's, Kings, Queens, Dictators, MSNBC hosts, CNN hosts, Fox News hosts, corporate CEOs, bankers, lawyers, judges, insurance people, real estate people, police, firemen, politicians, bureaucrats, family, neighbors, etc. a
All telling you what to believe usually because you're too dumb to use your own brain well enough and need to be told. The corrupt leading the dumb. You know, Democrats.
😞🤔🧐💯👍
There are also channels with humans no AI that spread crap info.
29:01 "The English said they should get to be King of France because It's not fair and mom said I can have a turn" is just so hilariously on point for the initial dispute I had to pause the video to laugh.
In a way it is true. The English claim to France was based largely on inheritance from Eleanor of Aquitaine.
The problem with that statement is that she calls them English and French not the trivialisation of the motivation.
That's very much what set off the conflict.
But to refer to them as nations is a bit dubious. This conflict is the beginning of the journey towards becoming nations rather than random wealthy families that spoke the same language in both areas and possessed land in both areas.
@@danvernier198Exactly. In her quest to make history "relatable" and fun, Janega quite often falsifies what actually happened.
@@lyalldawson7080
No, that’s Guyenne/Aquitaine. The claim to the French throne was derived through Isabella the She-Wolf, French princess and mother of Edward III.
@@danvernier198 I think the reason they're called "England" and "France" even today is mainly because it's easier for people to understand the conflict with such terms. If you had to say "The land that would soon become England" every time you talked about it, it would get very cumbersome, very fast.
I need more historians shitting on Ai depictions of history. Ai has been so shitty for preserving and talking about history.
AI is worrisome. I hate its dehumanising gassing of humanity while time after time Ai plays better at impersonating evil over good. How dare tech hold so much self importance over us all, we're the beings of consciousness here, not the damn toasters.
@burtlangoustine1 It definitely dehumanizing to human history, it's adds this touch of disconnect where people could potentially forget the greatness of people by not featuring the locations, clothes, and art of those times, and uses bad cartoon like depictions of real people that have no basis in historical records or anything like that, just other similar pictures. Ai totally sucks in a historical framework!
That's not the job of AI.
@@justsaynotoboomers Tell that to these youtube history shorts accounts just trying to make a quick buck on factoids and throwing inputs into an app
SnappyDragon (who makes and talks about historical clothes) has a video reacting to AI stuff
I love watching these with sub-titles. It's great to know about "Linda's Farm" and "Jonah Arc"
AI continues to be a jerk 🤣
And a pilgrimage to Canter-berry.
😂 😂 😂 😂 That's classic! Ai voice over for the win 😂😂😂
That's why the Viking's raided there. They wanted to visit Linda.
😂😂
RIP to the poor monks of Lindisfarne that were brutally sacked and massacred by Ragnar Lothbrok in the year of our lord 2013.
😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂
No Ragnar Lothbrok rules
If they had not had so much gold and precious stones to loot they would not have been worth the effort.
👍😂
The problem I have with badly created AI images is not with the image itself. It's when someone sees a badly created AI image and it doesn't click in their brain that it's fake and they share it raving about how amazing it is.
Or are bots sharing it?
@larrykelly-kf5pp sometimes both. A bot puts it on there to begin with, and then people share it because they like the pictures. Then there's always at least one person who thinks that it's actually something real and shares it to try and find out where to buy one despite the fact that it looks like a cartoon.......
@ I worry that in critiquing we’re just training young Albert to do better while we try to protect vulnerable people. 🤔
Hard to know but I guess we’ll work it out eventually
It's bots that share it. Humans have a baseline level of intelligence that lets us clearly see whats AI and what isn't
@DBProductions12345-m An example of what I mean is I've seen a site that sells plants. The images are clearly AI and not the actual plants. People comment on "how beautiful" and "how amazing" and when someone posts a picture of the actual plant or points this out, the comment gets deleted half the time.
Unless the positive comments are made by bots, too, to bring up the popularity?🤔
"It's a very famous woman..." "Yeah, the Flying Nun!" Lightning wit, there!
Wow, never would have guessed Dr. Janega speaks Czech. I would love her review the historical accuracy of Kingdom Come Deliverance game or it's upcoming sequel, should be right up her alley!
I was thinking the same thing!
Yes, this! Especially since it's centered around Kutna Hora which was, at the time, one of the biggest and richest cities and a huge competitor to Prague, because it was one of the hot spots for mining silver.
I've you've never been there and happen to be in Czechia, please visit. Kutna Hora is beautiful and it also has a very famous ossuary: Sedlec.
Let's not get too carried away with doctor talk.
Um, did you watch any of her videos and/or podcasts before? I learned that on, like, number 3...
Because she is Czech
'The English decided they should get to be king of France, because it's not fair and Mom said they could have a turn' 🤣🤣 just brilliant
Well, the English kings at that time, had a claim on the French throne, because they were descended from Eleanor of Aquitaine.
@@richardjakobek7477 From Isabelle of France who a king's daughter, not Alienor who was a queen consort.
@@robert-surcouf Very true. I stand corrected. But that makes the claim stronger.
@@richardjakobek7477 True for the claim being stronger but Alienor was also the great-great-great grandaughter of Robert 2, the second capetian king who ruled between 996 and 1031 so she had royal blood (Robert's grandaughter married Alienor's great grandfather aka Guilhem 8).
Nevertheless, Edward 3's claim was still the weakest of the three main pretendant (Edward 3, Philippe 6 and Philippe of Burgundy) after Charles 4's death, either it was because he wasn't from a male line unlike Philippe 6 or because by female line, he was from Charles 4's younger sister (Isabelle) line unlike Philippe of Burgundy who was from Charles 4's older brother (Philippe 5) line.
The irony of this claim by female line is that when it happened in England in 1399, the lancaster dynasty who was the oldest male line alive from Edward 3 take the throne to Edmund Mortimer who was the heir by the eldest line (Lionel of Antwerp) but it was also a female line (by Philippa of Clarence, Lionel's daughter)
I'm a simple woman, I see Dr. Janega, I click
I do the same thing.
Am I a simple woman? 😮
Fellow simple woman checking in! 💜✨
I'm a complicated man, I see the good doctor, and I click also.
Not to confuse with Dr. Jenga.
These declarations from simpletons all over youtube must be Bots.
I remember when they said AI would make life easier, reduce mundane tasks. Instead all we get is it stealing artists work and doing a bad interpretation of it.
I went to high school in the late 70s here in Britain and our teachers told us when the new technology came in we would all;
have extra leisure time, all be rich there would be no need for masses of paperwork as offices would be paperless and machines would do all the hard physical labour 🙄.
Now nearly 50 years on and none of it has come true.
People work longer hours, for less money, paperwork is still duplicated despite also being on computer systems and apart from Roomba vacuums we still have to do manual tasks.
@@nigeh5326 And you still have to manually clean the Roomba when it runs over dog crap.
@@nigeh5326 Well it turns out that technology is "neutral". In other words. It can be used for good and improving lives. But it can be also used to deepen the wealth inequality and increase social issues.
The industrial revolution is a perfect example for this. When it happend, it was terrible for the majoritiy of people. Labour and agriculture suffered greatly and it took several generations to get out of it. Once that was over though the benefits of it started to come in which we still see even to this day.
But this idea that technology has always like inherently lead to improvements? I believe that's wrong.
& spending 10x as long trying to find the right results on search engines. I still cant believe this shit was easier when i had to concurrently use Netscape, Webscape, Jeeves & company
"all we get"? ::sigh:: what you describe as "all we get" is the barest, tiniest, fraction of the tip of the AI iceberg.
if that's "all" you're getting from AI (hint: it isn't), you're doing life wrong
Awesome idea and great episode, thank you Eleanor and history hit!
It would be really nice to hear more about the Prague history!
Agreed! Eleanor often speaks of being a Prague specialist and I love to learn of things I am not well educated on. As an American, please teach me something I don’t know about one of the most influential and powerful regimes in history.
More defenestration and such!
Yes! More Prague! More Bohemia! More Holy Roman Empire!
There's the Wikipedia article 🙂
@@martavdz4972 Bohemia, of which Prague was the capital (at least in the 19th century) belonged to the Austro-Hungarian empire for 300 years. The other part of modern-day Czechia is Moravia. Czechia has really interesting and well-documented history.
Thanks for speaking out about this trend. It is up to the content producers to care enough about what is in their videos to look at the images they accept and learn enough about the subject to know if those images are accurate. I have to skip over bad ones all the time.
To be fair, you don't even have to know the era to know a picture's done by AI. Just look at the details shown - the cloaks that grow out of the clothing worn under it, the OMG nightmare fuels hands or blank stares, the thing that has wheels on two adjacent sides and nowhere to hitch a horse or ox - there are so many things that give AI pictures away to anyone who spends even a moment looking at them. The issue is, really, that people don't know how to think critically about things any more.
AI was supposed to take over the boring mundane things so that people had time to be creative, not take over the creative stuff so that people had more time for boring mundane chores.
The Monty Python clips dish so hard. 👨🍳💋 Yes, even a low budget 70s absurd comedy featuring men pretending to ride horses can be arsed to do better research than your AI.
She said Henry VIII was a jerk. I provide thy like button.
Did you mean press? TH-cam provides the like button.
Her comment was a glib anachronism and wrong. Henry VIII headed a tenuous dynasty that had a meagre thread of legitimacy and many domestic enemies. That he renounced his & the nation's faith - to become defender of the faith as the monarch still is, in order to preserve his dynasty, is about temporal power.
@@CMI2017 plenty of people at the time thought he was a jerk, plenty of people now do - what you mentioned he did has everything to do with that
@@peterworwood6483 confirmation bias does not prove an argument, not from 500 years later. He was the English state & state power affords considerable extension of action in its retention.
@CMI2017 damn I didn't know Henry VIII apologists are a thing
I saw an AI christmas advert being advertised by a legitimate company Opendoor which I presumed is run by people with eyes in which the Turkey had 7 legs! On a side note the laziness and greed of these companies knows no bounds.
I saw a populist party in my country, with a fairly large following no less, use AI to depict a perfect, white heterosexual family (somehow they were all blonde too), all of them with 6+ fingers. Do you think any of their followers actually cared?
Check out the Toys R Us AI ad. It's horrendous
Toyota and Coke also made Christmas AI ads and they look horrendous, the "art" is constantly morphing in the background and it looks like it's actively rotting, no clue why these billion-dollar companies thought that was ok to do
Joan of Arc was famously executed in the styling of and on the set of Dune: Prophesy on HBO.
Tleilaxu facedancers too!
😂😂🤣🤣😂
Ok but I WOULD LOVE a multipart series on medieval Prague/Bohemia/Holy Roman Empire!! I feel like it was confusing in school so I just skipped it. But the drama of 7 guys electing the emperor? Dr Janega would absolutely rock it!!
In second half of 17th two more Kurfürsten/ electors had been added: Hannover and Bavaria.
I love listening to Dr Eleanor, she always explains everything brilliantly and in such a great way you enjoy every minute of her lectures.
Yes. As long as you do not care if the stuff she claims is actually correct or completly made up nonsense.
She said guns do not belong in medieval times... Guns were very much around back then. This woman is a fraud
@@wedgeantilles8575How is it untrue?
@@Peaches_Montclaire Just two examples: Her claim about no f**e-wea**ns is complete false, they did exist.
And how she is making fun of n*bility taking part in f**hts.
There was a very good reason why they did it.
That she does not know this is just embarassing.
Sorry for the spelling, but that's the only way you will be able to see it.
@@Peaches_Montclaire No fi**ar** - for example.
I made more examples, but the post is gone.
She is so funny i could watch like 5 hours of her hating on ai
Right? This needs to be a series!
So, yes to Dr Janega being tortured more?
Funnyly enough - or not so funny after all - the AI isn't doing a worse job than her.
She is ignorant and a lot of her statements are absurd and a bad joke.
@@wedgeantilles8575 Name one.
Nothing about this woman is funny. She reeks of Karen
I needed this, I just spent like 2 weeks trying to research medieval tavern architecture for a painting, and I only found people selling what they think looks medieval based on vibes, or ai image garbage. The roast was necessary for all the rage I dealt with
Magna Carta obviously wrong because it wasn’t signed half way down. When asked ‘where was Magna Carta signed?’, every English schoolboy responds “at the bottom of the page.”
That's so true. And then a clever clogs kid tells everyone they didn't sign it at all, the put their wax seals on it. The King's seal was the bigliest, obviously.
Well, the practice of the time is that the stamp on the seal hanging from the document is what legitimises it.
So both the middle and the bottom are equally wrong, the name would have been written by a scribe near the top and the stamp in the wax blob hanging from the paper would have been the equivalent of a "signature".
@@Crusty_Camper my vote is for "...on the dotted line."
The Lindisfarne example also ignores the fact that the monastery ruins are to be found in the present day village, two-thirds of a mile to the west of the castle and on the opposite side of the harbour, not next to it as in the AI cartoon.
"I know what Americans think like because I've been cursed." - That got a good laugh out of me.
It's so in vogue to shit on America and Americans, which reveals an unhealthy indoctrination.
This was so good! 😂😂
More of Dr. Janega!
She would be so fun to have drinks with. 🍸
Partying with the Dr. would be awesome!🎉❤😍
Hell yesss
Name the time and place and I am there!
I have also had this thought a few times! She would be the most awesome companion for a pub crawl!
@@UnDead483 especially in historic pubs!!
Why can't there be a rule that under every AI created image it should say: image created by AI. It's not hard....
“Vomited by AI”
Because then people couldn't pass it off as their own work. 😛
They’d just crop it out
This whole video could've been created by AI.
This woman is spouting absolute nonsense
@@yipperdeyip she’s a historian…
Dr Janega is so funny, and props to editor(s) - movie clips, pic zooms, timing of overlays were hilarious, this was so well done 😂😂😂
If the video has Eleanor Janega, Kate Lister, or Suzannah Lipscomb, I'm here for it. My history holy trinity 💖💖
I see your excellent list and would like to add Claire Ridgway.
You are led by postmodernist liars with a anti-europe agenda...
I wouldn’t include Janega in that list, she makes the others look bad. Saying guns not exisiting in medieval times???? Simply inaccurate. Saying kings fighting with their men is stupid? By modern standards yeah, but using modern lens to judge history is a poor frame of reference, Alexander the Great for example fought with his men, it showed a level of devotion and provided a morale boost. Today’s leaders would never set foot on the battlefield but that’s modern sensibilities.
Please learn actual history and not leftist rewritten history...
@@samjones7900 Kings fighting with their men *is* stupid from the point of view that it makes them incredibly vulnerable which she demonstrated by discussing the deaths of Harold and Richard the Lionheart. Yes, it does have some benefits but that doesn't mean you aren't gambling with some very large downsides like, for example, the breaking of your army at Hastings giving William the upper hand in his conquest of England.
"Medieval people thought being bald was sexy" - somehow I am halfway into building a time machine to go get a weird form of the plague because I was too thirsty.
Once again, this is another video I never knew I needed in my life. Dr Janega is simply goals.
This was a great load of fun. I loved hearing all the details you picked out as false; especially gray walls and ceilings.
Yeah, I feel your pain. AI is doing my head in too. Especially You Tube thumbnails. If I see one more picture for a Roman Legionary who looks more like a Spartan from the film 300 I shall scream and not be held responsible for my future actions. I mean, we all worried about the future picture in the Terminator films, but we certainly didn't see this nightmare coming.
What I despise about AI is how it straight up steals from actual artists and then vomits out these crappy images
Omg this was great - her level of shade is perfect. Please bring her back for more reactions to AI!
As both a historian and a fellow Czech , I had exactly the same reaction to the fake Prague! 😱
Don't know how I didn't know you were a Prague-ophile Dr Janega (considering how much of your content I have watched), but that just makes you rock even more in my eyes!! My favourite city in the world. Love the history, love the architecture, love the ambience and love the people 🙂
Bro, wake up! New medieval torture method just dropped! (Except this only works on medievalists.)
This was totally awesome. I just found this channel and Dr. Janega is my new favourite historian. I will now continue to binge-watch as much as I can.
8:09 Had me laughing out loud! Brilliant punmanship! 🤣🤣
Ahoj, Dr Janega! Always a pleasure to see your videos and the entertaining way you present history. 😊
This was hilarious… great video for a long drive!
Fun fact: a bishop’s hat is called a mitre, at least today in the Catholic Church. Either in this period It was different, or she was referring to the papal tiara, which only the pope wore, not any other bishop.
There's a special in hell for lame people who us the term "fun fact". Also, that wasn't a fun fact.
@ I used it simply because she used it to describe the bishop’s hat in the video. Also, you would do well to stop using the concept of hell so frivolously. Peace.
I'm a simple girl, I see Dr Eleanor and I watch - never disappointed by her incredible knowledge and delivery!!!
Yay! It’s an early Xmas present, more Dr Janega content!! 🎁
It's quite funny being able to see exactly which kinds of images the AI used to make every single one of these. You tell it " please depict historically accurate medieval prague"
And it goes "Right on chief, let me just butcher someone's medieval fantasy city concept art real quick."
People think AI can somehow create things beyond human capability. Just cause you know. It smart robot, it steal all the art.
I once got Ancient Egypt with... excavators in the background. And people like to convince me that AI is smarter than most humans. No human would have done that unless it was deliberate (like a time-travel scenario or something along those lines), which the AI model definitely wasn't trying to do.
I'm a translator with three languages, have also translated movies and books, and having to quit after 18 years due to crappy machine translations. "Infuriating" doesn't cover it.
Love Dr EJ! She's real about things, very entertaining, and so darn smart.
I had no idea there was someone like this on History Hit. I have no subscribed. This is the most fun I've had on youtube in a LONG time.
Check out the We're Not So Different podcast. Dr Janega kills it!
I need more Eleanor videos in my life! 💜 This was so entertaining & yet thoughtful
I love history hit, obvs, and I love the way Eleanor Janega presents. So warm, so natural, so incredibly informed. Hi from an Australian fan
Was the Joan of Arc picture pulling from US puritan witch trials? That would account for some of the severe dress and everyone wearing almost the same thing. While I didn't believe everyone dressed identically at that time either, they did dress in a more similar way.
I thought it was trying to be some 17th century witch trial! Though the colonies only hanged their witches.
Your the best Eleanor! I love your presentation your sense of humour and I adore all you do on the history Channel. Give us more please.
Great! I wondered where Dr. Janega had got to.
It's reassuring if AI is crap. This is a public service film!
Nice one Eleanor and team. 🌟👍
I think another issue is also not one thing AI produces is new, it is just an amalgamation of data put into it. All these images look so familiar. It is creating nothing new, stagnating and regressing art.
It's cud. It takes people's real creativity, ingenuity, and innovation and reconstitutes into soulless slop for the masses to mindlessly chew on
Aren't humans just an amalgamation of our experiences? Why is "true novelty" the benchmark for artistic greatness here? Is there a correlation where fewer common elements an art piece has, the better it is? Data itself might not be new, but there are endless number of ways to arrange it. Child grown in absolute darkness with no experiences would not make for a great artist. Inspiration and vision aren't willed by the soul into existence from the ether.
@@MidWitPride Sounds convincing in theory. In actuall practice though, AI is 100% making the art world stagnate and regress, it's been a shitshow for the last two years. It is based on theft, and nothing original comes out of it. And AI-bros can only get "likes" if they show something derivative of something that people like already anyways (like fake paintings "in the style of X").
The only thing achieved by generative AI so far is enabling art fraudsters to prompt an image, copy it "by numbers" onto canvas and sell that through naive local galleries who don't have a clue.
This video is gold! I'm new to HistoryHit, but I'm addicted. Also, I never turn down an Eleanor video! This one though, cracked me up, but also is so loaded with facts. Please make more!
Dr. Janega, my favorite History Hit host!
AI is not worth the money and technology we have put into it, I fail to see how AI creates a better anything. AI doesnt depict humans as they are not human, just a blobby outline of what maybe looks like the form of a human if you look very far away. Dont like the AI but love Eleanor! She makes medieval history so much fun and accessible! I'm a subscriber of HH and this channel and I would love to see more docus/videos with her in it!
AI is useful in technology, medicine and law. Whoever thought of using it in humanities, though... Humanities involve emotions, morality and aesthetics. As far as I know, AI is about as familiar with them as a caterpillar is with the planet Jupiter.
We weren't really TV people but this was kinda like watching a movie with my parents. "Oh, for godssake - men didn't wear shirts with attached collars then." or "Look at her, unbound hair and make-up! She would have been run out of town!" etc. I rather think that's why I became an historian.
AI: Actual Idiocy. Art for Idiots. Awfully Inept. Act of Insanity?
AI is still in its infancy. We'll talk next year.
@@AmperSand666 It'd be more impressive if I hadn't been hearing that last year. That said, I'm less scared of AI than I am the clowns who are running the companies that are trying to invent it. AI should be a national project, overseen by the government, transparently run with the interest of the public in mind. Not the vanity projects of spoiled and entitled rich boys. We've been here before with social media, and look how that turned out.
“Asinine interpretation “
I really like this format as a conversation starter about medieval European history.
Beyond the humor involved, this is a very productive discussion to be having around nascent AI. The mismatch that is obvious to the specialist but hidden to most others under a kind of 'confidence' that AI presents all its outputs, particularly images of this nature. More of this kind of content is only likely to rise and it's nice to see a presentation of that AI-Human exchange as centering the importance of human knowledge, understanding and nuance as critical. Dr. Janega's generous thought experiments on behalf of the AI are particularly helpful and I imagine very accurate to the flow of neural network encoding. Maybe because any academic has an understanding with the hyper-intelligent child-student that an AI can be conceived as, but certainly because of her innate empathy even amid the same kind of sharp wit that makes these videos enjoyable at the expense of technological fumblings forward. 🤖🦄🤖
I really enjoyed Dr. Eleanor Janega's commentary both educational and otherwise - I hope you have her back again!
The sad part is all of the people who will tell her to “chill out, they’re only pictures, have you not heard of artistic license, get a life”.
More Dr. Janega please!
This was fun! (FYI - a bishop's hat is called a "mitre," not a "tiara." A "tiara" is a three-tiered crown worn by the Pope.)
Wow, that's so professional, and so charming at the same time! Kudos for that, and I am definitely smashing the subscribe button! ❤
I could happily spend a week wandering around historic Britain with Dr Janega as long as we could spend the evenings in bars drinking and talking about how bloody awful many monarchs were.
Cheers Doctor Janega 👍🏴
I think you'd have quite a merry band to join you! 😂🍻💜
That sounds like an awesome time!!!
The AI art shown was not something I was personally into, but the segment with William the Conqueror around time-tagged at 26:28 minutes in with the depiction of some of the old intact art pieces, I did like that; I enjoyed the overall historical explanations that Dr. Eleanor Janega provided when she explained each period of historical reference that the AI art attempted to depict.
I asked Chatbot to create an image of Dr. Eleanor Janega as a medieval historian at work. They ended up looking a lot like the AI image of Eleanor of Aquitaine although she had eyeglasses and a pen in each hand!
I believe she would love that! What a compliment!
Ah doctors so have eye glasses
Dr Eleanor Janega is... the mother I never had. she is the sister everybody would want. she is the friend that everybody deserves. I don't know a better person.
I thought the first one was the Rock of Cashel at first, but of course not on an island.
Edited to add that if this is what happens when you put Dr. Janega in front of a camera and let her go off script, please let her do it more often.
I enjoy history and I really enjoy your videos. History isn't dates and names, it's people. You do a very good job of talking about the people and making them live (in a manner of speaking) again. And let me say that I would absolutely love to watch a video where you took a drink every time they screwed something up. The humor when you were three sheets to the wind would be epic and hilarious.
"How can I be mad about anything ever again when I've already seen the depths of hell?" - Dr. Janega, 15:08 PURE POETRY
As a public historian of a different time period, I completely understand the pain, Dr Janega! I swear these AI images are pretty much the same as the general public's perception of history, no matter what time period we're talking about. Thank you for enduring it for our entertainment.😄
But worse because maybe good images are screwed to create this abominations.
Ok I was so distracted by how lovely Eleanor was I had to go back and rewatch the beginning. Great idea for a video! I think of this whenever I see a weird AI thumbnail for a history video.
Very pro this Eleanor reacts style - the fashion tier lists were great, if you decide against further torture. But I'd be up for asking AI historical questions and making fun of its answers too.
I love this woman. She is incredibly smart, and presents in a way that is entertaining. I look forward to her content. History taught, and told the way it should be.👍
21:51 - that side eye after the realisation.
Despite making fun of the worst thing ever invented in my lifetime, this video was also super informative and educational. Upvote and please make more!
Absolutely my fave historian! We want more eleanor!
Thank you for playing two of my favorite Quest for the Holy Grail moments.
"And that's why I'm a Prague specialist, 'cause it's the best!" 😂😂😂 She is lit! Now I've got to dig through TH-cam to watch more of her stuff…
loved hearing Dr. eleanor on WTYP, great video
Dr Janega is so passionate & down to earth, humanocentric in her analysis. Highest Praise!!!
I absolutely loved watching this program. So interesting. Thank you Dr Janega. I am a big fan. ❤
Fairly famously Agincourt did have a couple of guns (to no effect). But nothing handheld, you would call them cannon nowadays, and they would have fired hand-chipped gunstones and not cannonballs.
Saying guns have no place in a medieval battlefields is quite ignorant.
Dr Janega is so much fun, doesn't matter what part of the middle ages she's taking about, it's a good time.
I do research on history, and art history in particular, for my novels. AI has RUINED Google. I just go to the library and look things up now.
Your comment about knowing how Americans think because you have been cursed cracked me up 😂-I definitely feel your pain! BTW, love listening to you & Matt on Gone Medieval.
My favourite explanation of the 100-years war. "is when the English decided that they should get to be kings of France because it's not fair and mom said they could have a turn".
Or even Mum
Eleanor you rock! Love watching your videos and always come away feeling I have learned something. Keep up the good work! 🤴🏰💖
Very generous ratings
This was hilarious and well done. One nit: the plague doctor mask at 22:37 dates from the 17th century, not the 13th.
I am expecting to have a plot twist at the end were we find out that all the pics were real and it is Eleanor that is AI generated.
Now that would be impressive. 😂
I need a series of this every week and I would pay for it.
2:28 Why aren't those buildings so colorful anymore if they are not abandoned? For example churches that are still in use, why are they not repainted throughout Europe?
A LOT of churches in Europe are colourful. It depends on the country, the region (poor or rich), the time period (some mediaeval churches genuinely never had been painted, but from the 16th century onwards, most of them were). And it also depends on the money. There are hundreds of thousands of churches in Europe and they need to be reconstructed by experts, which costs money that the Catholic or Lutheran or whichever church doesn't always have. There are hundreds of crowdfunding campaigns going on in my country to repair and re-paint churches, and it usually takes 10-20 years to put together the millions and millions that are needed.
Also want to point out that for a lot of churches, it took decades or even centuries to build them. The monastery in my town was built over the course of 80 years. They're massive and require the work of hundreds of artisans and highly educated experts. So it's not a surprise that it takes decades to repair them after wars, natural catastrophes or economic decline when there was no money to keep the building spic and span. Also, the Catholic and other churches have less money nowadays.
@@martavdz4972 Ah thanks for the information
@@martavdz4972 A lot of medieval churches were painted, not only from the 16th century onwards
The real reason is that we usually try to conserve, not to rebuild. I mean how would you repaint a church? We know a lot, but we also don't know it exactly. We learned that the hard way in the periods of Historicism or the Romantic Era in the 19th century, where a lot of medieval castles were rebuild. But they did make a lot of errors, because they didn't know better and now we have some weird amalgamation of periods that isn't historically accurate. You could ask that about a lot of other buildings too, why is the Forum Romanum in Rome not rebuild, why the Egyptian Pyramids, the Temple of Zeus etc. ? Before you do it wrong, you better don't do it at all. That's why.
This. Is. Fantastic! 😀 More of this, please! And maybe you can it with Kate Lister too!
The thing about AI is that its just an aggressive search engine with the ability to make pretty pictures.
You have to remember at all times that AI is not definitive. It is not absolute. Junk in junk out.
Oh, Eleanor, don't hate me, but I want like 75 more of these with you. I love your good natured irritation and I always love the way you discuss the different facets of history. More! More! Just don't give the poor woman anything else to do with Prague. 😘
I completely agree on the fact that the AI is definitely not a tool for Historical and Knowledge Preservation, but you're telling some severe false assertion too though, and it's irritating, but I need to keep it civilised. However, It's insulting on various deep levels. As such, please, people, go check Metathron reacting to this video to have a clearer and truthful view about certain topics treated here...
Although it's not on the full video, of course, it's enough to understand, and to not buy misleading/false/not completely correct/etc...information that has been said here.
I rather enjoyed this!! Great topic for a video. I love Dr. Yanega's presentation. My favourite piece here was the history of Thomas St Beckett. I first heard this name in a reference by Benjamin Franklin on the HBO John Adams show and I tried to look it up myself but the history I was reading confused me more. With this little snippet it made so much more sense thank you 🙏🏽❤