What the failed Russian nuclear test tells us about Putin's missile forces | Ukraine: The Latest
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ต.ค. 2024
- Day 960.
Today, we look at why Kamala Harris isn't talking about Ukraine, and hear from a missile-technology expert about what Russia's recent failed (and very expensive) missile test might mean for arms control and strategic ability.
Contributors:
Dominic Nicholls (Associate Editor, Defence). @DomNicholls on X.
Tony Diver (US Editor). @TonyDiver on X.
Tim Wright (Research Analyst and Programme Administrator for Defence and Military Analysis at the IISS). @Wright_T_J on X.
Students can subscribe to our coverage for free:
We’re giving university students worldwide unlimited access to The Telegraph completely free of charge. Just enter your student email address at telegraph.co.uk/studentsub to enjoy 12 months’ free access to our website and app. Better still, you’ll get another 12 months each time you re-validate your email address.
Subscribe to The Telegraph: telegraph.co.uk/ukrainethelatest
Email: ukrainepod@telegraph.co.uk
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
I disagree with the comments about the position of Mrs. Harris regarding Ukraine. Her knowledge, position and support is clear. Mrs. Harris seems to be tempering down her position as candidate so the war doesn’t became a partisan issue. I have no doubt that if Mrs. Harris get elected, the support from US to Ukraine will be more efficient, decisive and proactive compared to Biden’s team approach.
Thanks for keeping us informed!
thats wishful thinking. ukraine is done bro.
@@shaun1463whatever Rusbot
It took Biden how long to finallly submit that the US wants Ukraine to win. Needed a firmer approach on Russia.
Bots bots bots
Ukraine ❤
Just watched the Funeral for David. Was putting it off for a while as didn't want it to be the full end. Beautiful service though, and lovely readings by Dom, Francis and the family.
RIP David.
Regarding VP Harris’ limited Ukraine references, maybe she is avoiding voter pivots that Trump has clearly made one of his issues.
I also disagree. Mrs. Kamala Harris has definitely spoken on Ukraine multiple times. Her stance is very clear, and actually, I would say stronger than Joe Biden's.
Still listening from Alberta Canada 🇨🇦 Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦
Before I even listen to this podcast.... remember that the uks last 4 trident missile tests have all failed...
Good morning from 🇨🇦
Big problem for P.
It never ceases to amaze me how these propagandists can always talk positively about Ukraine, regardless of how bad things are actually getting.
I'e stopped at 18:38, to comment that I judge that the podcast is failing to understand Harris's politics and electioneering. She has to win to the White House. She has to, in her electioneering, speak to the American electorate. Here person and electioneering are at one with her focus on domestic matters. What she has to say about Iran, should be understood in relation to what she has said about doing right (to a degree) by Palestinians. Where her position on American domestic matters, extrapolates directly to what she might say about what Palestinians also want as a life circumstance. Her approach to foreign policy is symbiotic with her (and TW's) approach to domestic policy. What is taking place in Israel is way more significant to most Americans, than is what is going on in Ukraine; remembering that she has to win to the White House first. So her Iran answer was bang on.
I think her approach to foreign policy, when President, will emerge from her domestic policy; all people round the world wanting basically the same life conditions; and TW on that score, being on the same page.
Regards the NATO question, she was again bang on; because that issue and its complexities cannot be answered from her domestic policy core. Here she will preside over experts who will take the lead on what is involved in Ukraine joining NATO. Always remembering that Ukraine being inside or outside NATO, may in practice look nothing like what we currently imagine.
Anyway, back to listening to the rest of this always excellent Telegraph podcast. Before, incidentally, the wife and I go and sign off on our Wills!
Is maintenance cost for the Trident program included in the 2% gdp defence budget for the UK?
That guy in Michigan doesn’t speak for all Americans. For me at least, foreign policy and Ukraine specifically is a huge point deciding my vote.
great
Where Brits say 'I couldn't care less' Americans say 'I could care less'. So when an American says 'I care less' who knows what they mean ?
Harris of course is less experienced, but so was Harry Truman.
GJ!
My gut feeling regarding Kamala Harris’s Ukraine policy is this: she’s keeping her powder dry as it’s not central US electoral focus (ie, why bring it up unnecessarily)
However… her personality and career would suggest she despises thugs and bullies… and she will take a very robust position against Putin.
Pennslavania or north carolina is the only important states to monitor )) Either decides the winner
so, when and where is the 2nd peace conference that Zelenskiy sent out an invite to Russia... what's the latest on the frozen Russian assets... and what's going on with the F-16s ?
🇺🇦
Was it a failed nuclear bomb test, or a failed ballistic missile test which could eventually have nuclear MIRV payloads aboard? My understanding is it was the latter, no nukes aboard, just to be clear. Anyways, Slava Ukraini!!!
It will happen, a rogue drone will create casualties in a NATO country and the question will be asked, too late unfortunately.
Wasn't our last Nuclear missile test a failure from a Submarine?
Your good
Yeah but Russia says they are invincible
And the one before that
@@buddyrojek9417 Well they would make light work of us Brits that's no question. They are the most capable military on the planet at the moment when we like it or not
@@7107-n1h theres no doubt of that.
The British MoD really do need to lay off on the class A nonsense.
The Ukrainian diaspora , mostly the Greek Catholic , the Bandera faction , they have encouraged Ukraine to be independent, poke Russia , but now just send old clothes instead of pressuring politicians to give ammunition. Shame on them ! Ukraine needs them in the western countries to pressure the media and politicians. Instead they send second hand clothes .
The Chinese Foreign Ministry announced on Thursday that the country imposed sanctions on three companies and 10 individuals over the recently announced United States weapon sales to Taiwan."The United States recently announced that it would provide large amounts of arms aid to China's Taiwan region, which seriously violated the one-China principle and the three Sino-US joint communiqués, seriously interfered in China's internal affairs, and seriously undermined China's sovereignty and territorial integrity," the ministry said.The sanctions target Edge Autonomy, Huntington Ingalls Industries, and Skydio and their senior executives, as well as senior executives of other firms on the "countermeasures list."
I really try to get a range of views on the news so I can be as well informed as possible. I don't want to get stuck in a bubble. I want to listen to everyone, including bootlickers to see who has the most compelling points of view. However, Dominic is either so dim, or presenting in such bad faith that he gives me the same sort of headache people like that "cash me outside" girl from Dr. Phil give me.
This is just parroting the keef post and isw .so it’s total one sided propaganda.yes dimdom is embarrassing
Moscow currently sees no basis for talks with Washington, regardless of who becomes the next US president, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov said.
"Unless this line [of the anti-Russian policy being pursued by the United States and its allies] changes, no talks on strategic stability or extending the New START Treaty can be held, regardless of who becomes the next US president," the senior Russian diplomat told reporters.
On February 21, 2023, President Vladimir Putin stated that Russia was suspending its participation in New START but not withdrawing from the agreement. He emphasized that before Russia could consider restarting work under the treaty it would need clarity on how the document takes account the arsenals of not only the United States but also of other NATO nuclear powers - Britain and France.
I saw Kamala Harris in NYC last week…
She’s incoherent and dizzy in real life as one would expect from anything she has said in the past…
She’s as politically tatty and shabby as the rest of the United States of America is infrastructurally dysfunctional.
For the sheep lol
I saw Kamala Harris in NYC last week…
She’s incoherent and dizzy in real life as one would expect from anything she has said in the past…
She’s as politically tatty and shabby as the United States of America national infrastructure is dysfunctional.
Kamala Harris answers questions in the manner and depth of a miss World contestant asked about how to improve the world.
... Whereas the orange idiot is completely coherent and eloquent?
Slava Russia