How-To Determine Good Technique
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.พ. 2025
- In this video, Drs. Baraki and Feigenbaum discuss the thought behind picking a specific exercise technique.
2-Day Barbell Medicine Seminar:
www.barbellmed...
Pain and Rehab Seminar: www.barbellmed...
For more of our stuff:
Podcasts: goo.gl/X4H4z8
Website:
www.barbellmedicine.com
Instagram:
@austin_barbellmedicine
@jordan_barbellmedicine
@leah_barbellmedicine
@vaness_barbellmedicine
@untamedstrength
@michael_barbellmedicine
@derek_barbellmedicine
@hassan_barbellmedicine
@amato_barbellmedicine
@charlie_barbellmedicine
@alex_barbellmedicine
@tomcampitelli
@cam_barbellmedicine
Email: info@barbellmedicine.com
Supplements/Templates/Seminars:
www.barbellmedicine.com/shop/
Forum: forum.barbellmedicine.com/
Once I found this amazing crew a year ago, I switched from being a form purist to focus on it from an efficiency perspective. It has made me a better lifter and made me enjoy training much more. Thanks for putting out this content to us mortals. Sincerely, a former squatu subscriber.
@@littlethuggie Squat univeristy
@@OGfromGst oh, that's so sad. Aaron is a boss.
@@OGfromGst Squat univerthirsty....
@@littlethuggie a boss? A boss at noceboing people, or a boss of shenanigans perhaps...
I’ll pass on SquatU.
Barbell Medicine just speak truth. Based on what they know from current research as well as their own experiences. They deserve a greater following.
littlethuggie What was it about?
@@alexwright5954 I was replying, so instead I just posted my reply as a new thread. It was simply how lifting changes with load and things, and there becomes a right and wrong way to do things, or a better and worse way. Then about (active, increasing) flexion of the spine under load not being a mechanism of potential injury, we which just isn't true.
And they deleted my response again lol.
@@alexwright5954 "@Barbell Medicine actually, the better the DLer, the less what you said is true: Coan, Konstantinovs, Browner, etc. There's flexion in their spine, yes, but it doesn't increase to any noticeable degree, even at max loads, that is to say it's "rigid" in its place. In this case the discs and facets aren't at risk, there's no shear, etc.
In your case, would you say what my spine does during a pull is inconsequential? I can just bend over, grab the bar, stand up, with any amount of spinal flexion (including continuing to flex as the lift progresses) not ever being provoking?"
They deleted it.
@@littlethuggie we didn’t delete any thread or comments. I still see it on my end too. Why would i delete the thread I spent time responding to? Relax.
O gotta say, the way the wall is evenly divided between you two messes with my head. It looks like you two are in different shots composited together.
My head canon is that Dr. Feigenbaum does the joke each video and pokes Dr. Baraki each time.
I very much wish this were the case, and encourage Dr Feigenbaum to make this happen in the next series of similar shorts.
I think the biggest argument come down to the deadlift and the rounding of the back, and the more experienced I become, the more complicated it seems to be to decide
So many MLB players through the years have provided excellent examples of high-level performance with seemingly awkward technique, particularly with batting stances.
I improved my deadlift 1RM for five days in a row just by small adjustments in form and not going to hard the day before.
Congrats, but I’ve gotta imagine your 1RM must not be super high if you were able to build on it five days in a row with no rest days.
@@aumurphy It went from 300kg to 400kg in five days.
Did you drink a gallon of milk?
@@Sealed_Chamber yea, your story makes no sense. You said you did it by “not going too hard the day before”. If deadlifting 300kg is not “going hard”, then it wasn’t your 1RM.
I didn’t really start to grow until I ditched numbers on the bar and focused on the mind muscle connection and the pump. If a given technique doesn’t provide that feedback then I drop it.
Maybe not useful for strength but it was a game changer for hypertrophy… at least for me.
Mind-Muscle connection has been researched to be significantly less effective than bar speed in terms of muscle activation (SBS has a great evidence-based article on this, if you're curious). The pump is literally nothing more than blood flowing into the muscle because of usage.
Your change might have been in programming and or diet and recovery, but I doubt it's pump-chasing and MMC.
Pump actually might be implicated in hypertrophy. Certainly not a closed book.
@@TheoneandonlyTB135 I’m glad the science based fitness community has figured out what all those jacked dudes at the gym have been doing wrong all these decades
Strength comes from stressing the CNS. Size comes from stressing the muscle.
I started with bodybuilder style lifting in the '90s. For the past 3 or 4 years I focused on strength and lifted in the 3-6 rep range. I got stronger than I ever thought I would be but I liked my body better the other way. I found a pretty happy medium in powerbuilding. Plus, I like both styles equally. Each one is a completely different challenge.
Great video !
source for the partial rom hypertrophy evidence please?
Love these video shorts!
Does anyone else call him Dr F-bomb in their head? Makes me lol, but I do appreciate the content!
Cheers guys, great content as usual 😎
how people can complicate simply lifting of a bar.........incredible
comment for the algo
how does CC end up in Dutch language,. Does not translate beck to english
What I know from experience is bad technique is quickly expressed by the body as tendonitis or a strain/pull whereas good technique does not.