“Not my king”: Support grows for abolishing British monarchy | Al Jazeera Newsfeed
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 พ.ค. 2023
- “Not my king”: Support grows for abolishing British monarchy
Subscribe to our channel bit.ly/AJSubscribe
Follow us on Twitter / ajenglish
Find us on Facebook / aljazeera
Check our website: www.aljazeera.com/
Check out our Instagram page: / aljazeeraenglish
@AljazeeraEnglish
#Aljazeeraenglish
#News
He has 2 billion in his account yet millions of taxpayers money spent on him . The disparity between the rich and poor is ridiculously huge. May God save the poor
2 billion is not a lot of money
This King and his family represent the dirtiest and shameless nation in the World who poisoned the Chinese people with opium by force, and thereby destroyed the health, lives and souls of countless innocent Chinese people. Nothing else is more inhuman than what this nation had done with the drug.
Have to agree.
2 billion is not much money. Ireland sends a billion to so called developing countries and spends as much at home welcoming as many as can come from the 4 corners of the world.
Still having homelessness, housing shortage. Health system struggling, drugs, taxes, seemingly full employment but still a big presence of obviously healthy looking people wandering at leisure .... Maybe Working from Home??? Hard to quantify
Anyway... The working population is experiencing the same problems without a monarchy as UK is with one
Everytime the royal family go somewhere everything is paid for
@@ADITYAKUMAR-ut4zl2 billion is what shown on papers. Reality is always hidden my friend.
Why not make contributions to the monarchy voluntary? We will see how many Royalists there truly are then.
right on
So the cost of the monarchy is £1.68 per person! The monarchy brings in billions from tourism for the country! No way could the government replace the revenue! They are well worth the cost! Unless you want to pay more in taxes?
The Royal family with all its Royal traditions, castles and history generate millions and millions of pounds annually. The Royal military guards and bands put on a amazing display and are active men and women serving their country. Who would pay to see a Grey uninteresting politician. Great Britain unbelievable rich, royal history is what gives ordinary people pride and who they are Royal. The Royal family are far more stable and pleasent to look at than any politician. Finally how much charity work and time do those thought less people do
It’s not just about the money though, it’s about the principle it represents of hereditary elitism and wealth disparity
@@jjmarsh2003 please don't tell me you're came from non monarchy nation and saying that, it came up as jealous and bitter 🙄
People can't even afford their gas and electric.
royals have shares in that as do the MPs
That’s their own fault. It wouldn’t change if there was a republic.
We are slaves under corrupt system xx
Meanwhile the royals live in luxury
They should cancel Sky TV and give up smoking.
Piers Morgan is going to blame Harry and Megan😅
Piers Morgan is a hateful creep.
These people are right. There is no need of kings in 21st century in the times of democracy and constitutional values.
21century is devil century
Royals family fund limit by government
But democracy constitution are the most
corruptions everywhere
If your unlucky assign there's self as Dictator
Your statement makes me laugh. Have you ever heard of a thing called a corporation? They do not adhere to democracy or constitutional values. What about the super-rich i.e. the 1% it is the same. What nothing on them?
There is democracy and constitution in the UK
@@trishitdas3428 There is also a monarchy. And how do you know there is democracy? because the media said there is? How do you know the election results are not arranged by things like corporations?
While the UK has a constitution it is not a document like most countries had written. That was my point.
The British Monarchy exempts itself from Laws that other citizens face which the people find unfair.
Like what?
@@The88Cheat
There is a Law against racism that doesn't apply to the monarchy.
And like the report said they are exempted from inheritance Taxes.
@@The88Cheat ask Andrew
@@Aquacrystal78 Law against racism? What? Only the monarch him/herself has immunity. The royal family is not. The royal family also voluntarily pays taxes even though it is not required.
@@The88Cheatwhile you can bring a case against an employer for discrimination in the workplace if you are discriminated against, you can't do that if you work for the RF.
I don't understand why do they have to uphold that tradition of having king and queen. Eventually the citizens will get tired of these royal families especially in times of hard times and economic recessions.
His personal wealth is 2 billion, yet the taxpayer has to foot the bill for his coronation,250 million while his people are starving and have to go to food banks to survive
The british spend more money in one month on illegal immigrants than what the coranation cost ?
Hey a job
It's more than that. And so much more hidden that is not declared.
Need a big salary to live comfortably and sadly that’s not reality for working class people as everything is cherry picked from school days going of your family status that’s British politics I’m afraid you can be bright as a button and hit the scrap heap just because your family is not minted
Having a president also needs to pay him and h8s family so what's the difference, a few million pounds?
Charlie will become king but, his female will never be my queen, ever.
She’s divorced yet managed to marry the future king. History and rules get changed just as it suits them.
Chucky also cannot be head of the Church of England
Bla bla bla...
Exactly
the same as my feeling .
Who cares. The monarchy is an outdated idea
And BBC was questioning the expenditure by india on space exploration while completely ignoring millions of dollars of tax payers' money being flushed every year down the rabbit hole in their own country......i'm still waiting for their documentary on this topic.
The money goes to pay people.
Unlike india the U.K doesn’t revive foreign aid, unlike india the U.K doesn’t have slums.
Maybe because Indian space exploration turned out to be a fake news as it never happened. The Indian prime minister created this fake Indian NASA just to pull more money from budget and actually not a single rocket from India has ever gone anywhere, most of them crash
How many people die in the UK each year through lack of access to clean water?
The level of poverty and deprivation in India is far worse than the UK. So many people in India don’t have access to proper sanitation and clean water.
Thank you. This is the kind of coverage we deserve in the UK, but the establishment is afraid to allow it. Well done, Al Jazeera.
👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿
What, biased woke coverage?
@@PeterG1975 Can tell you're dense already 😂😂
@@TheRajk2222 my friend, if only you knew what a misnomer your comment was.
Lol, give the hundreds of thousands that will be there. All these morons are doing is amplifying a very tiny minority.
King or Queen belong in a story book. It is old out dated and costing people big $$$ in maintaining the royals upper lip life style. Harry had the right idea. Get out of it! Good on him.
But he isn't out. He wants his titles,and whatever he is entitled to. If he really wanted out he wouldn't be moaning about his family for millions and go out and get a real job. BUT.....his wife would then leave him because he would be of no use to her any longer.
.
@@passionatesingle .tell that to the rest of the socallroyal .all they do go out wave hand brainwashyou all .. that what you wish .it will neverhappen .Harry is good with his family.evil eye evil mouth .
Or in a chessboard. That's why we can no longer restrict chess to only being available to royals and nobility as there would be no one to play chess anymore. That's why chess has been mass produced so almost anyone can have an 8x8 checkerboard and 32 basic chess pieces. Then, competitive chess came into play. Some chess grandmasters can see the art of chess, and we can remember the kings and queens by playing chess.
I approve of what Harry did. He just got fed up with the whole thing. And his mother's death affected him very much. He was devoted to Diana.
perhaps they should reduce their ceremonial 'duties' by 99% to save money and all members of the royal family should get real jobs
Lol do you see how much they invest their own money in the economy
@@khanhnguyen-tt3ff Nope.
@@Fordnan Well, whether you realize it or accept it, they do. They more than offset their expenses with revenue.
@@The88Cheat I mean the majority of there wealth comes from land stolen from the British public and most of the rest from taxpayer money so there a big loss actually
@@khanhnguyen-tt3ff no because it's BS.
Do you think the Monarchy ever thought about giving a large sum of money to the homeless and struggling British people. They would not even miss that money and it could bring so much basic necessities to these unfortunate folks???
"They have make them selves fat for the slaughter. 🤷♀️
They do a lot for homeless charities, raising money, and Charles has Princes Trust which helps homeless people.
The monarch gives 85% of their revenue from the crown estates (i.e. Windsor Castle etc) to the government which is spent on the British taxpayer.
Which means they give us around 1.5 billion British pounds in total yearly, while in taxes we give them around 100 million British pounds (1.27 pound yearly per person).
Seems fair to me catlady3360
Basically you want communism. Start giving the kings wealth away and then move down. Till nothing is left in the till. Basically you are for an evil system made by Satan.
@@chrysalis4126 I think they did say something like that and they said don't leave plastic plus all the flower sellers made a lot of money. All the bears went to children's charities.
I still don't get it what is the point of having a monarch in this age.
Same in Saudi Arabia, UAE, Morocco
@@TheLatiosnlatias02 And some of which are absolute monarchies.
And I still dont believe you dont have brain
It's a very stupid system. Imagine getting your very first job at 73, because your mom died.
What job he doesn't do anything but wave
I often think about it and don't understand why do those people who have oxford and many other universities, and they teach others about democracy, people's right etcetera still adopt a tradition which supports a family will be called as royal family, a child will be born in their family, a normal human child but eventually will become a prince or princess, and people will spend their money to adopt their aristocratic lifestyle and become curious about their interest, their daily life or their family issues. It's all funny to me. From Bangladesh.
Democracy is an English luxury not afforded to people of Scotland. The UK is a dictatorship run by England for England.
we teach democracy but arent very good at it in the UK. our system is rigged. most young people do not like royal family here.
In psychology it's called 'cognitive dissonance'.
When a person holds and acts on two contradictory views.
And the rich people at expensive elitist educational institutions are certainly not immune from cognitive dissonance. Indeed most depend on it, obviously. 😂
@@kanedNunable Democracy is a luxury afforded only to the English. The Scots are currently in the UK which is dictatorship run by England for England.
Because we generally figure out within 5 minutes of thinking about it. See but the issue with that argument (being born into high positions) stems from its excessive simplicity inevitably and entirely leaving out that having a person born into a family that has ruled for generations, go through the best education the UK has to offer, socialising with other families that have ruled for generations - as well as other world leaders - surrounded by the finest things (which has a positively profound effect on the psyche, by the way) all the while being noble (noble, mind you, merely referring to set a characteristics so embedded within the subconscious that it becomes second nature), the nature of titles subconsciously alluring one to wonder about its, and subsequently the entire nation's, history, etc. etc.
They didn't learn from Princess Diana and villianized their superstars H&M.
The money this family is taking every year and on top from us is needed in the NHS, transport, roads to fix potholes, schools, nurses people and things that matter tonthe country. Shame on them.
The family GIVE money. You really are a moron, aren't you? You don't even know about your own country!
What about the money they bring in?
They receive the income because they have business. Why don't you just do that as well?
@@stanislaskostkajesiaslekst6036 Unethical businesses. Most businesses of most ultra rich people are unethical.
@@riimak4575 apparently they don’t bring in enough since UK still has poverty.
What goes around comes around. There's always a beginning for everything in life and there will always be an end to it.
good riddance to evil
I think end will will be over before the monarchy.
End the Monarchy!!!!
Put a end to uneducated protesters... How many are unemployable?
Lots of openings at MacDonald's. "Fries with that, sir?"
@@mariarevell4836 So true. Most are thugs.
@@mariarevell4836 put an end to peadophile loving monarchists like you
Also, when the British monarchy gets abolished, the British Empire will ultimately die. The British Empire is barely hanging onto his health after the World Wars and decolonization and given the fact that Queen Elizabeth II didn't do anything to save the British Empire. The British monarchy is the only source that keeps the British Empire from dying. After the monarchy gets abolished, Scotland will instantly gain its independence, and quite possibly Wales. Northern Ireland will be united with Ireland. Furthermore, each of the British Overseas Territories will claim their independences one by one or become terra nullis depending on indigenous population, and the Commonwealth Realms will become republics. After that, the new Republic of England will barely have any power compared to other countries, will lose quite a bit of population, and it can spark a wave of communism in Europe, as the UK is one of the key countries that support capitalism, along with Germany, France, Italy, and other strong EU states. With such a great reduction of power, England would no longer keep its legacy of not being invaded for long, as eventually, it could collapse into smaller states with even less power. The saddest part is that the British Empire would never get a chance to unite with Brittany, so Great Britain would never have a chance to unite with Little Britain before its death by monarchy abolition.
Down with the elitist racist colonial monarchy ! Power to the people!
Nope we Brits love our monarchy, we don’t care what other nations think and never have.
@@jamesknight6890 true, you are colonizers! Or we actually, I’m British…..and I hope the monarchy goes down in flames!
Sadly, when the British monarchy gets abolished, the British Empire will ultimately die. The British Empire is barely hanging onto his health after the World Wars and decolonization and given the fact that Queen Elizabeth II didn't do anything to save the British Empire. The British monarchy is the only source that keeps the British Empire from dying. After the monarchy gets abolished, Scotland will instantly gain its independence, and quite possibly Wales. Northern Ireland will be united with Ireland. Furthermore, each of the British Overseas Territories will claim their independences one by one or become terra nullis depending on indigenous population, and the Commonwealth Realms will become republics. After that, the new Republic of England will barely have any power compared to other countries, will lose quite a bit of population, and it can spark a wave of communism in Europe, as the UK is one of the key countries that support capitalism, along with Germany, France, Italy, and other strong EU states. With such a great reduction of power, England would no longer keep its legacy of not being invaded for long, as eventually, it could collapse into smaller states with even less power. The saddest part is that the British Empire would never get a chance to unite with Brittany, so Great Britain would never have a chance to unite with Little Britain before its death by monarchy abolition.
Also, just because it was colonial, it doesn't mean it is racist. Also, colonies are required for Britain to be strong and compete with other strong European countries and prevent it from being invaded. Also, the British Empire grew strong enough to try the best that it could to abolish communism, the one thing that can spread and create dictatorships and quite possibly a nuclear war.
Of course Al jeezera shows protests or dislike against the British royal family and never the despotic royal families in the Middle East. Business as usual.
They care about their people but what about these jokers . They aren't even ruling the country, they are just wasting your billions of dollars on their luxury lifestyle.
@@Ummati-xv8zuryt👍
👏👏👏
They should have a poll on the Arabian monarchy… Al Jeezera is just looking for negative media and comments… in every country you will have people for and against… it’s that simple … am sure some people will be against the news media and want it scraped…
EXACTLY
Outrageous how many people in UK are struggling whilst monarchy is in the billions. Outdated especially the costumes & medals.
I’m 71 and British and l do not want Charles to be crowned. I do not have any respect for a man who is supposedly the father of the country. How can he be when he can’t be a father to both his sons or a grandfather to all his grandchildren.
To then have Camilla as Queen in any form just doesn’t sit right to me. It doesn’t matter what we think or our opinions they both will be crowned. Let be rational how much do they impact on our lives anyway.
It would be nice to see a united Royal family not the displays of childishness from Charles and William.
I concur but step families got alot of issues.The kings sons hold alot of bitterness towards Camilla for the role she played to destroy their mums marriage.
They can pretend to be together but are very much apart.
If the throne is dissolved,the glory called Great Britain will disappear and become a third world country.
Obviously you're a fan of the dipstick son and his horrid wife... get over yourself Charles and William are far more likeable than the clown prince
@janet ?? Google Charles in blue pinstripe suit with Grand child? If you argue he s more useful AS granddad, than that government does..but that is a choice the government makes. They could use royals more, this also is true for Netherlands Denmark etc. They choose to pay for em not use em (much).
Why should there be a king?
Why?
How does this help anyone?
I think the moment the people start asking just what are they for they will be finished.
Because they want another powerful real God on the earth with leverage not the Gods we read in the books
Who would you have as our Head of State, President Sunak, no thanks. UK tourism, hospitality and every business associated with them benefits from the Monarchy. Do you think overseas tourists come to the UK for the weather ?
Well it's better than having a senile President like Biden
The monarchy has a long, looooong tradition! It is part of the British CULTURE. As a Croatian I fully support the British monarchy. They are way better than the British government has ever been. Look at the graceful King Charles and than at someone like Johnson. LOL! Big difference in manners and grace.
It's not so much the 'monarchy' that is hated here in the UK, it's Narcissist Charles.
It's the Camilla and Charles!
THANK you.
We have a bad PM and we don't say the whole office has to go ffs.
Don't forget about the pervert brother, Andrew?
@Jessica Jones he's a Tory snivelling dipshit. Nothing to do with skin tone!
@@JessicaJones-hl2hk You're a moron.
Not My King 🇨🇦
God save the King and RF from Evil 🙏🙏🙏
Open a new Burger King at Windsor!
@@mariarevell4836
You mean that old senile clone of Joe Biden who is friends with Jimmy Savile, Bishop Ball, Enoch Powell, Gary Glitter, Bruce Forsythe, Ian Paisley, Ghislaine Maxwell, Janner, Mountbanner
@@mariarevell4836
26 Major Signs King Charles is the ANTICHRIST!
Janie DuVall interview with Craig Bong.
Watch and learn!
Jesus Christ is preparing to return.
@@mariarevell4836 .you better save yourself .and worrying about saving them .
As a indian i am very comfortable about freedom of speech in UK !!
India has non of that.
Yeah sure that dhoti made crime minister is your corner stone
@@proudhuman166 so that's not freedom of any speech at all. Not very clever are you.
Not for much longer
you realise they are trying to remove it? we have banned protests now. what is next?
At least citizen can say NOT MY KING without looosing their head, where as it is impossible to initiate such thing in Some countries with PEACEFUL RELIGIONS.😂😂😂😂
In Pakistan we are fed up with corrupt monarchy of corrupt Sharif and Bhutto in the guise of so called democracy.
same also with countries with republican system ruled by political dynasties
Same, since the same polítical party in my country has been up for 70 years straight in so called democracy.
Same here in Indonesia
Lol Pakistan is a poor example...there's no democracy there...the military takes power whenever they want- it has happened so many times.
This doesn’t concern you
Also support for Welsh independence is up we don't need this man the crown estate takes 5 billion pounds a year from Wales money we need for our NHS and children
I believe he would be respected more without Camella now going to be Queen. After all they were so awful to poor Diana.
Don't forget that Diana was vilified by ALL newspapers and much of the public for dating a Muslim right up till the accident
Shut up
The real damage the Diana situation did was ruin Charles' reputation, which has caused political instability.
And so it should be under threat, its SHOCKING that British Tax payers are paying for this billionairs Coronation the sooner they are abolished the better let them all get real jobs
The sooner they are abolished, the sooner the British Empire will collapse, and England gets invaded, ruining its long legacy.
It's ridiculous that in 21st century the Great Britain and Northern Ireland is still a Kingdom.
Why does it matter if the monarch doesn't have any real power? The UK is technically a kingdom, but it acts like any other democratic republic in practice.
🇮🇪🇮🇪🇮🇪🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸☯️☯️☯️
@@The88Cheat If anything that gives them even less reason to exist.
Oliver Cromwell thought so, and created a military dictatorship, committed genocide in scotland and ireland, and deported thousands to the colonies to work as indentured servants.
It is just Britain. The prefix 'Great' was self-assumed by the English.
The UK maintaining lavish lifestyles for this one family while its infrastructure crumbles is like that one friend who can't pay rent yet wears designer clothes.
I doubt there would have been so much pushback if the figure in question led an exemplary life befitting his status in society.
True. If say, William was being incoronated instead of Charles, people would be cheering instead of booing. We all know why.
@@eveyk.1204 Yes we do. By the way, I've learnt a new word from your response i.e "Incoronate" which is definitely a different word to the basic word I'm always used to - "Coronate".👍
@@samuelt.kisaame7787 wait, which one is correct? 😂 Because English is not my first language so i might have said it wrong.
@@eveyk.1204 Both are, actually. For the record, English is not my first language either.😄
@@samuelt.kisaame7787 can you imagine now someone else comments that we are both wrong? 😂😂
Why does King Charles not swear an oath of allegiance to the British people? Why do the British military have to swear an oath of allegiance to Charles????!!!!!
The UK is dedicated to keeping the elite in comfort.
It's all an outdated demonstration of perceived superiority.
Cause hes king. He does not need to make an oath to the people. Because he has authority over them
Because then the armed forces would have to swear allegiance to the prime minister and parliament. Do really want them to be sworn to them or a man with no real powers.
It's about time to get rid of these clowns. If he wants such a ceremony so desperately, why can't he pay for it with his millions? Why is the Royal Family allowed to write laws that excempt them from paying taxes? What kind of a "democracy" is that?
Because their property is State owned, the State cannot pay taxes 😂.
@@hakim1138 But he can with his billions, why should the TAX PAYER pay for all the Pomp and Ceremony, if they want it they should pay for it
@@hakim1138 That is only partially true. E.g. Balmoral Castle and Sandringham House are privatly owned by Charles and he did NOT pay any inheritance tax on either.
@@PEdulis he gifted millions from the windfarm leases every year, in lieu of the inheritance tax and he voluntarily pays income tax. He can not pay inheritance tax as it would mean selling off assets that belong to the queen and breaking them up, which would destroy the perpetuity of the monarchies historical artefacts, many of which are displayed or open to the public.
The queen was completely exempt from any prosecution during her time, she could literally have committed murder and walked away scot free. That’s how insane it is.
Great Britain needs to evolve from the Dark Ages
losing our monarchy is not the answer. Long Live The KING
@@BillVanner-cq3vn
So you favour that old senile who is friend of Jimmy Saville, Enoch Powell, Gary Glitter, Bruce Forsythe
There are 43 countries with monarchies. Why are you singling out the British?
@@BillVanner-cq3vn kinda is
It’s too progressive if anything. Traditions are good for a culture. Go live in a cultureless Utopia, good luck.
they should clearly take the money from the monarchy and put it into the minister pension, it's only fair
🤷♂️ Or return the money to all the countries the monarchy stole it from considering most of the money and wealth is in jewels and diamonds they stole from places like India and Burma ☯️
@@MsDboyy Africa?
@@MsDboyy the monarchy, didn’t steal any jewels or diamonds you seem to forget the monarchy has no say in British politics that’s why it’s a constitutional monarchy,
@@chrishilton3626
Continue to dream the monarchy has no say. They stole in the name of monarchy. Whether they know or not, they didn’t question it! Why? Because they know it and has oppressed other people for hundreds of Years, Ireland, India.
@@thefirm4606 Africa is not a country dummy
Nothing to lose from abolishing the monarchy and it would decrease some of society's costs. Logical business practice.
The hundreds of thousands of those employed in tourism, hospitality and associated businesses that exist because of their being a monarchy would disagree.
@@jjefferyworboys8138 Excuse me, but doesn't 90% of the world without a monarchy also have tourism?
Though the UK doesn't rank too low on the list, it's still completely overshadowed by countries WITHOUT a monarchy. So tourism isn't a valid excuse.
Something to lose -- an entire empire in which the sun never sets! A legend! There is a quote, "No. The legend must live."
@@AlbertTheGamer-gk7sn Well, if you want the "legend" to live, maybe start doing something about that extreme poverty. Hm?
@@Bidmartinlo Maybe we can just sell some overseas territories and distribute the money to the poor. There are plenty of overseas territories, and Britain can still be an empire even with half of today's overseas territories.
UK has way bigger problems. NHS still has issues, people are resorting to food banks because of high living costs, UK citizens don't want to work menial jobs. Having one person personified as "The State" in a ceremonious role can't tackle these issues head on.
How about UK citizens learn to vote for better leaders? You get what you vote for.
The Monarchy and the Government are two separate things. The government are elected to deal with the running of the country. The king is not personified as “The State” he is a monarch. Do some research on the difference between government and monarchy.
@Christabelle
Of course he doesn't have direct rule but he is the Head of State. You think No. 10 will never go to him? He doesn't need a passport because he is The State. You open a UK passport it will ask permission in the name of the Majesty (not the government) to let you in another country. Plus 14 other Prime Ministers represent him don't they?
@@jonye7511 not a single leader I would waste a vote on in this dumping ground
"NHS still has issues". Guys what happaned? You left the EU so you would not pay the EU tax and put the money into NHS and what ,still doesnt work? If several bilions didnt fiix it , 100 mil wont cut a dent.
Only Guardian, Al Jazeera that posted videos like this. Its hard to see videos like this on The Daily Fail, The Telegraph etc.
its cos they are all made for old senile flag shaggers.
And you don't see they have a monarchy which is completely unaccountable?
it doesn't matter as long as they are honest & fair tabloids cannot be paid by an invisibke contract and we can say they are reliable source because they never fooled people. In social media or any source i dont read or view any source that were rooting for the monarchy because they are so toxic and so mean with H&M, i want to hear news with a fair treatment and reliable. Positive people stay away toxicity and negative environment.
Dear aljazeera first abolish qtari monarchi
Q: When is a democracy not a democracy?
A: When it's in the UK.
😡👎
Oh so Denmark isn't a democracy? It's one of the most democratic nations on earth and it's a monarchy. Please don't talk if you don't know
Spot on. All the newspapers and radio stations are working for the rich.
Not really. Try looking at Sudan.
The monarchy is going nowhere.
God save the king.
@@aaacsacahh9088 Indeed! The Republicans can get stuffed
@@aaacsacahh9088 The king will soon die just like lil Lizzie.
And so is the British Empire! The legend must live! :)
Angus me 😡 that all that money 💰 being wasted. Annoys me that Charles used to be called the Prince of Wales. Now Kate and William are the prince and princess of Wales. Not even Welsh 😡 it's absolutely disgusting all the shady things this family has done throughout history. I want them gone😡 DOWN WITH THE CROWN!!!
Couldn't agree more. Full of scandals like Andrew diddling underage girls... Just one example of many royal scandals. They don't deserve any taxpayer welfare money.
Karen lore
The sad part of the reality is that they are part of your culture they are part of who you are, getting rid of them is exactly as saying getting rid of yourself
Me to a men .
@@fernandvdg8368 How so?
Abolish the monarchy
Also, when the British monarchy gets abolished, the British Empire will ultimately die. The British Empire is barely hanging onto his health after the World Wars and decolonization and given the fact that Queen Elizabeth II didn't do anything to save the British Empire. The British monarchy is the only source that keeps the British Empire from dying. After the monarchy gets abolished, Scotland will instantly gain its independence, and quite possibly Wales. Northern Ireland will be united with Ireland. Furthermore, each of the British Overseas Territories will claim their independences one by one or become terra nullis depending on indigenous population, and the Commonwealth Realms will become republics. After that, the new Republic of England will barely have any power compared to other countries, will lose quite a bit of population, and it can spark a wave of communism in Europe, as the UK is one of the key countries that support capitalism, along with Germany, France, Italy, and other strong EU states. With such a great reduction of power, England would no longer keep its legacy of not being invaded for long, as eventually, it could collapse into smaller states with even less power. The saddest part is that the British Empire would never get a chance to unite with Brittany, so Great Britain would never have a chance to unite with Little Britain before its death by monarchy abolition.
Kings and queens OUT of every country in this world. Thieves OUT!
Well not every monarch. The Prince of Liechtenstein is still very beloved by public of Liechtenstein, heck even voters gave more power to the monarchy in a referendum in 2003. The Japanese monarchy should also not be abolished as it has such historical significance to many Japanese along with its history.
@@costanvaarwel8932 Lienchtenstein is not an example of anything. Its a country of 40.000 people, a city. And the rent of the people there it is x4 times the EU average...
Talking about Japanese monarchy, again the only argument possible is talk about historical tradition to say something good about the monarchy. There is no more reason to argue to keep a heritage institution who lives like gods with the money of everyone. No sense. No sense in Japan, no sense in Spain, no sense in UK, possibly it make sense in Lienchtenstein, but not, it make no sense.
By the grace of God? Camon...🤦🏽♀️
Why? Japan seems to want to keep the emperor.
@@rabbidcrazy787 Without an emperor, you can kiss anime shows goodbye.
But there is going to be one place where kings and queens cannot be driven out, and that is the chessboard. The reason why chess has grown in popularity and commoners being allowed to play chess is the lack of monarchies. Also, we want to continue remembering the monarchies and wars in the past, so we will play chess. If you want the kings and queens out of every country, you can let the world unite into one big republican country, so you can also drive wars, disputes, and any type of conflict over tradition, culture, religion, etc. out of the world.
Do people of Qatar want emir?
I don't know about Qatar but the Monarchy of Saudi literally pays monthly Allowance to it's Citizen for their legitimate recognition.
@@Aquacrystal78 that's why they don't give citizenship to outsiders. So welcoming 😅
They (The Quatary) are getting paid a monthly salary, which, by the way, is much higher than the English. Only if your fathers father is a Quatary native can you have citizenship. Immigrants are not permitted after the contract ends they go back to their country.
they are happy with their emir
absolutely outrageous situation
It's pathetic isn't it
My family left England to escape the monarchy. My British brothers don't need a monarchy. Think of those in need, rather than worship a family that keeps its dna in one circle
The reality of life is that it can be unjust at times. 😔 While I support tradition, I believe that the monarchy should take more action to assist those in need. Simply mentioning the existence of charities raises the question of whether they truly benefit people or merely serve the interests of the monarchy. 🤔 These are my own views, others may not agree and that's cool. Different folks, different strokes. ☺
Why don't you do proper research into the charitable works, the princes trust, Duke of Edinburgh all the charities they support They have helped thousands of people. Idris Elba was helped by Princes Trust for one.
How much of their own personal wealth do they give to charity? I can wait.
@@gailcusden3607 Is just being there helping? How much money did prince Philip personally give that wasn't already given to him by tax payers? Philip was worth allegedly £60 million when he passed away. How much of his own money in his own personal bank accounts did he give to charity? His will was sealed for 100 years so whether he actually did give a few million of that to charities we will never know.
@@daviniarobbins9298 You just can't wait to have President Boris can you?
@@gailcusden3607 They can't allow themselves to do that , too scared they may learn some truths. They will be thrilled when they end up with President Boris or some other politician with rich backers.Look at the current and last American Presidents.Old men with rich backers Hardly an improvement on a non political Head of State.
They say the rest of the world is in arrears but pay the royal family taxes every month so they don't go to jail 🤦♂️
Harry, Andrew and Margaret are all pure examples of how the monarchy has slipped. Time to call it a day. It all ended with the late Queen Elizabeth.
Well, when your life has no purpose because you were only born for in case your older sibling died, what do you expect?
Add camalia .
The monarchy failed all three of them.
Well, the late Queen Elizabeth reigned for more than 70 years, and through her 7 decades of her royal life, she didn't do ANYTHING to save the British Empire. Instead, she watched her own empire grow severely ill, and once she was on her deathbed, she realized that she betrayed her own British Empire, and then hoped that the next kings can try their best to bring the British Empire back, and now, if the monarchy gets abolished, there will be no one to save the British Empire, and given the fact that the navy was scrapped in the 1970's, we could say that Britain is in "double trouble"! 😢
Just wondered why we're not seeing this play out on BBC News 🤔😁😂, ooh I know making the public to think everything is all rosey 😂
So true .
Rosey posey
What would the punishment be if this was happening in Saudi Arabia?
Answers on a post card please!
Chop chop!
Well, since Saudi Arabia is an ABSOLUTE monarchy, the king would probably execute them. Remember King Louis XIV's motto on absolute monarchies: Disobey me, then baby, it's off with your head. Also, the king can declare himself emperor whenever he wants as well.
I think in a world where it is expensive to live we are sick of seeing some people living off the hand outs!
How much did the coronation cost? It's one freakshow after another. It's probably money well spent, as Britain gets so many millions of tourists from around the world interested in the Royalty and looking at 'Buck house' and spending a lot of money here.
British royalty.., the nation's largest farce and waste of money. This is the real motive of the British monarchy, and any monarchy in general: to spend all the tax payers' money, and all the wealth looted from their colonies for their own useless pomp and shows. To borrow Oscar Wilde' phrase: Truly they all are in a gutter.
NO MORE ROYALS
Sadly, when the British monarchy gets abolished, the British Empire will ultimately die. The British Empire is barely hanging onto his health after the World Wars and decolonization and given the fact that Queen Elizabeth II didn't do anything to save the British Empire. The British monarchy is the only source that keeps the British Empire from dying. After the monarchy gets abolished, Scotland will instantly gain its independence, and quite possibly Wales. Northern Ireland will be united with Ireland. Furthermore, each of the British Overseas Territories will claim their independences one by one or become terra nullis depending on indigenous population, and the Commonwealth Realms will become republics. After that, the new Republic of England will barely have any power compared to other countries, will lose quite a bit of population, and it can spark a wave of communism in Europe, as the UK is one of the key countries that support capitalism, along with Germany, France, Italy, and other strong EU states. With such a great reduction of power, England would no longer keep its legacy of not being invaded for long, as eventually, it could collapse into smaller states with even less power. The saddest part is that the British Empire would never get a chance to unite with Brittany, so Great Britain would never have a chance to unite with Little Britain before its death by monarchy abolition.
Abolish the monarchy.
@@SymphonyBrahms Please, think about what the monarchy is doing to make the British Empire go strong before jumping to crazy conclusions about the monarchy must be abolished. One day, when the monarchy gets abolished, you will be happy, but the next day, your house could be bombed by a communist country that is invading your country as there will be no monarchy to save the British Empire from invasion.
What a load of rubbish the royal family are here to stay ❤
Exactly. Woke Republican advocates in the UK that demanded the abolition of the British Monarchy need to go woke and go broke, and they need to go heck off.
Let the Circus begin! Let's crown the clown-in-chief! 😂
All I have to say is, remember the last time we were a republic. That didn't exactly go well now did it-??? I bet the same thing would happen again.
Up the Irish Republic! ✊ 🇮🇪
@@eaglesfan226 The UK is more globally important, well known and richer than Ireland will ever be so, stay jealous.
@@eaglesfan226 Says the guy, arguing in English.... right.
So you would rather be a subject than a citizen.
Things didn't go well because you removed one tyrant with another tyrant who refused to listen to the people of his country.
The people who fought in the new model Parliamentary army called for full enfranchisement of all men.
Cromwell refused.
Having a tyrant as a king is not the solution. Get rid of the parasites and establish a Republic of the people
Past is past. There were different people in the past
Bit by bit we are tearing down great British Institutions. Our Country for a number of reasons has lost its identity. We are shamed to be proud of our Country and even called racists if we display our flag with pride. Immigration has caused a big part of this by diluting our population. Certain political persuasions are also responsible. I live in a Housing association house and was warned NOT to fly MY Country`s flag from the balcony in fear it may upset peoples Cultures and religions. We have become a Nation who is often reminded of our Colonial past and our Involvement in Slavery and that we should be sorry for our part in things that happened 100`s of years ago. The British Royal Family is like a figurehead for the UK and people with an anti-Monarchy agenda want it removed because they believe that the RF stands for everything they do not like. Unfortunately these people have the loudest voices and can be quite persuasive using the Internet/ Social media to spread their Ideals. I think that it is sad that we are no longer proud of of our County and our Monarchy. I also think its sad that people should feel guilty and ashamed about this Country. Look at how many people who are illegally and Legally trying to live here. Is not that a great big advert that this Country is a great place to live. They talk about the cost. Immigration/Asylum costs per annum = THREE BILLION. The RF draws 86.4 million. Immigration/Asylum costs Vs The cost of the RF which is 0.023255814% compared. The RF contributed 1.77 BILLION towards the UK economy. But it aint all about the money right.
I don't know abt people but the people of royalty should be sry for their whole lives because if you want to enjoy becoming the royal then it comes with consequences.
I am not entirely sure what you mean but you say that that people of royalty should be sorry for the whole of their lives? If that is the case then perhaps every one of us should do the same because nearly every person on this planet will have some historical bad behaviour in their family. It is what we do now that counts. As far as I can see the RF strives to do good and add positively to my Country. They are not perfect and there are some bad apples within but is that not the same as every family in this planet?@@smudge321
I think that there are too many royals...there should just be one...ie the king or the queen and the others should make their own way in the world....not given all the big houses , private jets etc.
This is true.
However, speaking from experience, the public is not capable of handling that. In addition, it's grossly unfair to the lesser royals who still have the stigma of being royalty as they have to work regular jobs.
It's not reasonable.
It is reasonable to give them modest allowances or aid (modest homes, etc) to avoid them just being subjected to the challenges of regular life among people who may still hate them just for being royals.
Correct, make them work for a living.
Not my king!
Sadly, when the British monarchy gets abolished, the British Empire will ultimately die. The British Empire is barely hanging onto his health after the World Wars and decolonization and given the fact that Queen Elizabeth II didn't do anything to save the British Empire. The British monarchy is the only source that keeps the British Empire from dying. After the monarchy gets abolished, Scotland will instantly gain its independence, and quite possibly Wales. Northern Ireland will be united with Ireland. Furthermore, each of the British Overseas Territories will claim their independences one by one or become terra nullis depending on indigenous population, and the Commonwealth Realms will become republics. After that, the new Republic of England will barely have any power compared to other countries, will lose quite a bit of population, and it can spark a wave of communism in Europe, as the UK is one of the key countries that support capitalism, along with Germany, France, Italy, and other strong EU states. With such a great reduction of power, England would no longer keep its legacy of not being invaded for long, as eventually, it could collapse into smaller states with even less power. The saddest part is that the British Empire would never get a chance to unite with Brittany, so Great Britain would never have a chance to unite with Little Britain before its death by monarchy abolition.
Every thing has a lifespan 😊.
What about the Roman Catholic church,which is still the Roman empire ? Just asking.
Also, when the British monarchy gets abolished, the British Empire will ultimately die. The British Empire is barely hanging onto his health after the World Wars and decolonization and given the fact that Queen Elizabeth II didn't do anything to save the British Empire. The British monarchy is the only source that keeps the British Empire from dying. After the monarchy gets abolished, Scotland will instantly gain its independence, and quite possibly Wales. Northern Ireland will be united with Ireland. Furthermore, each of the British Overseas Territories will claim their independences one by one or become terra nullis depending on indigenous population, and the Commonwealth Realms will become republics. After that, the new Republic of England will barely have any power compared to other countries, will lose quite a bit of population, and it can spark a wave of communism in Europe, as the UK is one of the key countries that support capitalism, along with Germany, France, Italy, and other strong EU states. With such a great reduction of power, England would no longer keep its legacy of not being invaded for long, as eventually, it could collapse into smaller states with even less power. The saddest part is that the British Empire would never get a chance to unite with Brittany, so Great Britain would never have a chance to unite with Little Britain before its death by monarchy abolition.
@@AlbertTheGamer-gk7sn Well said .That's what they can not swallow,England becoming eventually a third world country and forced to pay many reparations by those they forcefully yoked.They would better hang on with the monarchy and pay those maintenance allowances than allowing themselves sink into abyss.
@@AlbertTheGamer-gk7snSo sad
@@AlbertTheGamer-gk7sn Good.
I feel exactly the same ,we will never have another queen like Queen Elizabeth, now it's all about family drama that we don't want to hear
It is so disgusting to see the King and Queen of Adultery lead the nation
Then find another king and queen. A more suitable one. No need to abolish your own empire.
I assume you mean Charles and Camila who he made his Queen and had her crowned queen in the UK.
UK citizens need to take to the streets & proclaim the changes they want to see.
Like we are seeing in France.
@@stevenhowe6677 you'll never see that because the ones who are complaining are the gen z and millennials crybabies that are too weak to even join the army let alone tough enough or brave enough to start a revolution
It’s a tiny tiny minority that oppose the monarch.
@@jamesknight6890 You KNOW this how? OR are you just 'guessing' ????
@@jamesknight6890 How tiny?
The monarchy bring more than they earn in tourism
Ever heard of the French monarchy? GONE but they still bring it more tourists to Versailles than Buckingham Palace
Little Charles is a joke. 😂
Time to CHUCK charlie.
@@titusmccarthy And replace him with a more qualified king to rule the empire, and not kill the empire.
As a U.K citizen who doesn’t really care about being a monarchy or republic because it’s irrelevant to my daily life, this “growth in republican sentiment” you say is hugely overstated, it’s basically a very very loud but tiny minority that opposes the monarchy, recent opinion polls give the monarchy a huge lead over republicans, no major U.K political party currently advocates for a republic and its not high on the political agenda at all. Of course at this time journalists and agitators like to stir up a fuss but let’s be real the Monarchy is not going anywhere.
Absolutely true. The fact is that there is only a small minority that actively wants to abolish the monarchy, and less than 30% overall who aren't in favour of retaining it. I think that ill-mannered protests just serve to trun people against the active republicans.
Do we really want to copy the USA with their presidential corruption worse than the UK.
I’m actually against royalty.
But when I see that in The Netherlands, the whole country is partying on the king’s birthday and the king is partying with them in Rotterdam this year with his family, I think: let’s start with removing the British royals. They are weird anyway.
Be extremely careful with the royal family from the netherlands. Maybe queen Beatrice could be a quite nice person but their sons are the other way around.
Literally why? It just sounds like your fundamentally biased and don't want to actually attempt to rationalise or see the benefits of the system of a Constitutional Monarchy.
Even the founding father of America knew that democracy was a fundamentally deeply flawed system, hence why they modelled it after the UK and introduced a bunch of safeguards.
See the issue with that argument (being born into high positions) stems from its excessive simplicity inevitably and entirely leaving out that having a person born into a family that has ruled for generations, go through the best education the UK has to offer, socialising with other families that have ruled for generations - as well as other world leaders - surrounded by the finest things (which has a positively profound effect on the psyche, by the way), whilst being noble (noble, mind you, merely referring to set a characteristics so embedded within the subconscious that it becomes second nature), the nature of titles subconsciously alluring one to wonder about its, and subsequently the entire nation's, history, etc. etc.
Democracy isn't a one-stop shop solution to your problems because it's hardly a solution at all. Need I remind you that our current cost for living crisis was caused by our elected morons? What of the most powerful man on the planet? Joe Biden? Wasn't he elected?
Just compare the House of Lords to the House of Commons and see what I mean. One house is barbaric, immature, barely gets on with anything; the other is respecting, respectable (at least it was, before we removed most of the hereditaries), knowledgeable, insightful etc.
You seem a clever lad. You can figure out which is which and draw your conclusions from there. Don't let others think for you.
So other royal families are good but ours isn’t 😂😂😂 that’s just pure anglophobia, we don’t want a republic we want our king!!!
@@jamesknight6890 I said let’s start with them. Not stop with them. But our royals are cooler than yours, you have to admit that. Our king is even a pilot on commercial flights. And he can hold a pen.
you are delusional
The anti-monarchist could be confusing _democracy_ and _republic._ The UK is considered the longest continuously functioning democracy. The other English-speaking liberal democracy, including the US, have systems of law, economic, government, and protected human rights that originated in England.
Years ago people in the past did get rid of the monarchy but years later they stupidly brought it back the coronation is a waste of money plus sending all those police officers to protect the royal family on coronation is ridiculous they should be catching real criminals not standing around for the king ridiculous
If you study history you will find out they replaced oppression with more oppression. Instead of solving the problem Oliver Cromwell added more oppression. He was simply a tyrant king with another name.
Those police officers swore on their badge to prevent the British Empire from collapsing, and if the British Empire collapses due to protests, the police will be responsible and get fired for disloyalty to their country.
They are right why should they pay for charles
Yeah all that money for inbred Charlie, id want a refund 😂😂
The monarchy is what holding the UK together. If you abolish it, be ready to see the abolishment of the UK.
😂😅🤣
You mean the word "UK"? Of course it should be abolished and replaced by "Republic"
@@talachastu816yes three separate republics.
@@mahmudhasan3093 4
I'd love to see the end of the UK in my lifetime.
About time people begin to see sence and campain to get rid of an outdated drain on our ever depleating resurces. The NHS is arguably in the worst state it has ever been but we spend public money on this rubbish!
The sun has set...
But Brits want the British Empire to be strong, as there is a full raging virus pandemic called "communism", which is probably way more powerful than 1,000 COVID-19 pandemics combined when it happens to use something called "nukes", and the British Empire is one of the key countries in eradicating this virus to stop the pandemic.
They should be using the money for the starving,this is way too expensive
he was PAL OF LORD JANNER, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, JIMMY SAVILLE, BISHOP BALL
Include Enoch Powell, Gary Glitter, Bruce Forsythe and Ian Paisley
These channels broadcasts these things about British Monarch. But doesn't show anything about their own backyard. And the people who are leaving comments about gas prices and living costs, show me which countries' citizen are able to affroad everything. With or without a monarch it will be the same. You make your living. You want to throw the monarch here but doesn't talk about middle east.
A country that being led by a woman will never be succesful, not that it matters if the country now actually has a King but the King is disbelieve in Allah The King of All Kings.
Down with the crown
Down with protesters...you don't how what you got till you lose it...
Open a Disney's at Windsor!
Sadly, when the British monarchy gets abolished, the British Empire will ultimately die. The British Empire is barely hanging onto his health after the World Wars and decolonization and given the fact that Queen Elizabeth II didn't do anything to save the British Empire. The British monarchy is the only source that keeps the British Empire from dying. After the monarchy gets abolished, Scotland will instantly gain its independence, and quite possibly Wales. Northern Ireland will be united with Ireland. Furthermore, each of the British Overseas Territories will claim their independences one by one or become terra nullis depending on indigenous population, and the Commonwealth Realms will become republics. After that, the new Republic of England will barely have any power compared to other countries, will lose quite a bit of population, and it can spark a wave of communism in Europe, as the UK is one of the key countries that support capitalism, along with Germany, France, Italy, and other strong EU states. With such a great reduction of power, England would no longer keep its legacy of not being invaded for long, as eventually, it could collapse into smaller states with even less power. The saddest part is that the British Empire would never get a chance to unite with Brittany, so Great Britain would never have a chance to unite with Little Britain before its death by monarchy abolition.
Up with the people.
@@SymphonyBrahms And then down with the British Empire.
*UK🇬🇧 still occupied Anguilla, Bermuda, Virgin, Cayman, Falkland, Gibraltar, Montserrat, Pitcairn, Saint Helena, Ascension, Tristan da Cunha, South Georgia & South Sandwich, Akrotiri & Dhekelia, Turks & Caicos*
Still Canada,Australia and New Zealand are dominion of UK.
And when the monarchy gets abolished, each of these territories will gain independence. However, some of the islands have no indigenous inhabitants, so those islands will become terra nullis.
Alternative ways to have spent that money instead of on the coronation : health care, housing, education..I could go on and on.
Monarchy is better than democratic form of government. Politicians are crocodiles waiting for funds.
There is a small minded, narrow and bitter minority in this country. Frankly it is embarrassing.
Yes, but they do bring in a lot of tourists.
@@johnmoore9862 I would have thought the tourists would want to avoid these types of people.some of them are actually capable of causing harm.
Defund all of the leaches
Perfect y’a don’t need em
We didn't grow in number. We've only revealed ourselves.
So much energy spent on a minor public expenditure, tbh. The British government is a lot better at wasting taxpayer money than just throwing a hundred million a year at the King. I get it, it’s very in your face, but if this is genuinely about curbing wasteful spending, there’s bigger issues to focus on.
Not really. Ours is a politician's monarchy - the power it gives them is what makes them so appallingly sycophantic toward the institution. We need a head of state independent of the prime minister, able to act as a referee when the PM for example illegally prorogues parliament. A proper representative of the people, not a representative of the elite.
You do realise we can focus on this as well as the "bigger issues" you mention, right?
Only sensible comment here.
It’s such a non issue in comparison to anything else.
What a lame defence
Wow thats weak sauce
2023 and the British still hold on to the royal clown. 😂😅😊
Not my king !!!!
Open a new Burger King at Windsor!
Sadly, when the British monarchy gets abolished, the British Empire will ultimately die. The British Empire is barely hanging onto his health after the World Wars and decolonization and given the fact that Queen Elizabeth II didn't do anything to save the British Empire. The British monarchy is the only source that keeps the British Empire from dying. After the monarchy gets abolished, Scotland will instantly gain its independence, and quite possibly Wales. Northern Ireland will be united with Ireland. Furthermore, each of the British Overseas Territories will claim their independences one by one or become terra nullis depending on indigenous population, and the Commonwealth Realms will become republics. After that, the new Republic of England will barely have any power compared to other countries, will lose quite a bit of population, and it can spark a wave of communism in Europe, as the UK is one of the key countries that support capitalism, along with Germany, France, Italy, and other strong EU states. With such a great reduction of power, England would no longer keep its legacy of not being invaded for long, as eventually, it could collapse into smaller states with even less power. The saddest part is that the British Empire would never get a chance to unite with Brittany, so Great Britain would never have a chance to unite with Little Britain before its death by monarchy abolition.
They don't favor this two clowns because of how they got together
We’ve paid 100 million for this. He’s not my king and Diana would have been my queen.
£250 million quoted by CNN.
He might not be your king, but there are plenty of other princes waiting to be king, so despite Diana might not be your queen, there are plenty of other princesses waiting to be queen. Why bother to abolish your almighty and legendary empire when you can just get another king, a king that is "your king"?
Have the Royal Family sell the crown jewels, properties and all other
assets they have obtained, and give all the proceeds to "The People"
To be honest, most of it was stolen from other Countries, so no.
@@67Doofus why not return it then?
They still do take from other countries. They could and should take care of the people instead of flaunting their opulence in front of the struggling masses.
@@richisixx I am well aware of history, and totally agree with you. Unfortunately, the uk is full of imbeciles.
At least the Brits are free to voice their opposition to the monarchy. Can the same be said about the people of Qatar ?
Nope. Look how Prince Harry is being treated. If you go against the crown prepare to be prosecuted ‼️
Blame yourselves for voting for incompetent politicians. The Monarchy didn't cause the Crisis.
Jesus blessed be the poor and needy in their time of need not money changers let it ⛈️🌧🌨🌩☔️ sense the people can't express them self JESUS take the wheel AMEN thank thank you the truth and righteous king 🙏
Hold it right there! Jesus (peace be upon him) is a prophet of God.
@TheLatiosnlatias02 no he's God! But I agree with the OPs comment👍
their days are numbered.
Sadly, when the British monarchy gets abolished, the British Empire will ultimately die. The British Empire is barely hanging onto his health after the World Wars and decolonization and given the fact that Queen Elizabeth II didn't do anything to save the British Empire. The British monarchy is the only source that keeps the British Empire from dying. After the monarchy gets abolished, Scotland will instantly gain its independence, and quite possibly Wales. Northern Ireland will be united with Ireland. Furthermore, each of the British Overseas Territories will claim their independences one by one or become terra nullis depending on indigenous population, and the Commonwealth Realms will become republics. After that, the new Republic of England will barely have any power compared to other countries, will lose quite a bit of population, and it can spark a wave of communism in Europe, as the UK is one of the key countries that support capitalism, along with Germany, France, Italy, and other strong EU states. With such a great reduction of power, England would no longer keep its legacy of not being invaded for long, as eventually, it could collapse into smaller states with even less power. The saddest part is that the British Empire would never get a chance to unite with Brittany, so Great Britain would never have a chance to unite with Little Britain before its death by monarchy abolition.
@@AlbertTheGamer-gk7sn Oh for that day to happen. Down with the monarchy.
@@SymphonyBrahms And the British Empire will go down as well. The British monarchy is the only thing that is bailing the water out of the sinking ship of the British Empire. Queen Elizabeth II didn't even try to send an SOS call to the coast guard. When the British monarchy gets abolished, there would be no one to bail the water out of the ship, and eventually, it will be completely submerged, plunging down to the bottom of the ocean, with no chance of being raised.
@@SymphonyBrahms But do you want the British Empire to get invaded by a pesky commie because it was too weak to stop the invasion? Do you want the monarchy to be replaced by a communist government with even stricter laws? Do you want to be sent to a labor camp like the Gulag if you did something wrong by accident? Once you reach a situation like this, you would surely want the monarchy back.