I apologize, I have a doubt, in the IEC 61025 standard, the fault trees each element is in a separate branch, the correct affirmation that it must be this way or the structure that you expose is also correct and does not contradict the norm.
I give you credit for all the work you do, but the excel creation of a fault tree analysis diagram is just not correct. One should be representing the FTA as it is represented everywhere and that is not done with Excel, but a pictorial representation of the failure that is received from the propagation of basic events. If you'd done it in a graphical tool you'd be great!
![ตีสิบเดย์ [FULL] | เปิดใจ "อาจารย์ เบียร์ ฅนตื่นธรรม" นักสนทนาธรรมสายดุดัน!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vqaBI_mnoDk/mqdefault.jpg)
Now THAT is an excellent presentation 👏
I apologize, I have a doubt, in the IEC 61025 standard, the fault trees each element is in a separate branch, the correct affirmation that it must be this way or the structure that you expose is also correct and does not contradict the norm.
Thank you for your comment, Felipe. I will check the point you are commenting on, and reply in more detail soon.
Felipe, I checked the standard but didn't find the requirement you mentioned. Can you confirm which clause of the standard you are referring to?
I give you credit for all the work you do, but the excel creation of a fault tree analysis diagram is just not correct. One should be representing the FTA as it is represented everywhere and that is not done with Excel, but a pictorial representation of the failure that is received from the propagation of basic events. If you'd done it in a graphical tool you'd be great!