When Evidence Expires - My Grand Rounds - Mt Sinai NYC - Critical Care Dept
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024
- Vinay Prasad, MD MPH; Physician & Professor
Hematologist/ Oncologist
Professor of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Medicine
Author of 450+ Peer Reviewed papers, 2 Books, 2 Podcasts, 100+ op-eds.
If you want to contact me, do it here: www.vinayakkpra...
Google Scholar: scholar.google...
Substack: vinayprasadmdm...
Podcast: podcasts.apple...
Personal Website: www.vinayakkprasad.com
Laboratory Website: www.vkprasadlab.com
Podcast Website: www.plenarysessionpodcast.com
Academic Publications: www.vinayakkpra...
Follow me on:
Twitter @vprasadmdmph
Dr. Prasad is one of society’s great minds. So articulate and OPEN minded. He always informs ideas that challenges current practice. God bless him!
Dope presentation. People are right to mistrust medical authorities when such flawed trials are used to drive policy and clinical practice.
expecialy when they did the whole plamdemic and plan to do more!
The problem is that in the beginning many elderly and hospital workers were complaining of chest pain and shortness of breath. They were told to stay home, take Tylenol and NOT to go to the ER. How many myocarditis cases were missed due to these instructions?
The "experts" were terrified of contamination infection from those with covid. So much so that the deceased were placed in refrigeration trucks in the parking lots of hospitals.... as if a corpse in a bag was going to breathe on you and give you covid.
To date NO cases of covid via surface contact have been documented.
Was probably me! Or Maybe pericarditis. All my labs were fine but I had chest pain and out of this world shortness of breath but my lungs stayed clear. They said go home and take Motrin
Right? Nobody is even making an attempt to calculate the iatrogenic medical malpractice of nurses and doctors gaslighting patients. Nurses and doctors on the whole tend to think very highly of themselves as smarter than everyone else, which I think we all know isn't true. It's unfortunate that I have this perception, but it's been my experience in more cases than not. We know our own bodies better than anyone or any doctor, even the smartest one in the world
Five years before covid, I went to hospital with sharp heart pain and all 10 ER doctors I saw over three days ignored or dismissed that it could be myocarditis(it was)
I brought it up because I started to have minor inverted t-waves on ekg with other nonspecific abnormalities after two days straight of 120 beats/minute resting heart rate. The last ER doc begrudgingly admitted me after only running a complete drug screen that came back negative because “that’s only seen in drug addicts” despite the fact that I had a viral case not bacterial.
then when the hospitalist admitted me, they ran a troponin that was off the charts. And only after that did they begin treatments, three days after I showed up with initial symptoms.
(Most) Doctors are terrible at diagnosing uncommon cases.
Meanwhile I ran my symptoms into chatgpt in a chronological order and after the first day with just the elevated heart rate and heart pain, it ranked myocarditis as a top 3 potential diagnosis. When adding in the inverted T-waves on the second day, it made myocarditis the top diagnosis.
Can’t wait for AI to replace the frauds in healthcare, especially after the whole covid fiasco of pushing vaccines, masks etc on the lowest risk people, with limit to no data.
@@shaniceervin1465ironically that’s the treatment for myocarditis (viral), bacterial you get a strong IV abx, an
Anti-inflammatory (up to max dosage) for long time.
For bad cases they give colchicine (not much data to support this though)
They might give some short term beta blockers and other heart medication (but it was such a rare thing that most doctors never came across it)
-had myocarditis 5 years before covid and misdiagnosed by 10 ER docs even after I brought it up.
Remember when they finally came out and said that they made this? Everyone that had this is a victim
Currently and applicable to women is the 2001 WHI study on women and hormone replacement therapy. For over 20 years menopausal women were denied HRT and as of April of this year a new and improved study revealed not only is HRT safe for women over age 65, it is found beneficial.
AMEN!
12:05 Covid 19 "the data for all therapeutics has expired". Thank you! Even with my basic understanding as a non-scientist, I felt this in my bones!
Dr. Prasad should have at least ONE MILLION subscribers by now! Unbelievable!
Wish you would speak about blocking patents , which big pharma use to stop great treatments. Maybe if we could get enough awareness of this we could force change.
Regarding the early, high mortality rate “from” Covid. What percent of those deaths may have been caused by 1) the lack of early treatment, and 2) the treatment finally administered in the hospitals contributing to respiratory distress (midazolam, morphine)?
And hasty/clumsy interventions?
And respirators.
AND caused by other things but labeled Covid.
I’m not an MD, but took many biostatistics classes for my PhD. I love listening to your explanations of experimental design impacts that are often not considered in studies.
Benefitted so much for your information thank you Margaret Western Australia
Placebos Work! - Safe & Effective.
Have a jellybean!
The most effective are the yellow ones.
Love watching your videos! Have been following since sometime in 2020 and you have helped me (as a non-medically educated person) understand what my intuition told me since the beginning of the 2020 stuff began
Thanks VP!! ❤ Would love to hear how you deal with people in your personal life who disregard your insights in favor of following the "party line". Do you simply forgive them and ignore it or has it changed relationships for you?
Perverse incentives pretty much describes all incentives instituted by the medical industrial complex
Pharma companies are also throwing out anything that would eliminate the future need for more medication, which exacerbates the situation of the vast majority of medicines tried not providing any benefit
"It’s easy to criticize me, but they’re really criticizing science because I represent science."
- Dr. Anthony Fauci
Fauci has always represented big pharma and himself
Spoken like a true Narcissist.
In his defense, he meant he represents the Department of Defense and the stockholders of multiple very important pharmaceutical corporations…it was just a slip of the tongue…nothing to see here…
It is like how religious communities take satire of them as an insult to their gods and deities.
No... Monty Python was making light of misplaced devoteism, for example, and not of any one figure in Life of Brian. The greater concepts and ideals are way higher than a quick jab, or even a life devoted to the detriment of which. Science, too.
@@FloraJoannaK you’re right.
I am the only true authority
-vinay prasad, genius.
Fantastic lecture
Thanks Doc
thought this was going to be what type of ammo he uses in his M1 Garand. My bad.
if 1 million people in a small city all wore masks all the time, how many lives would be saved
1?
1 million- small city?:) we have different perspectives 😄
/ from Sweden where the biggest city has 1 million citizens;)
People touch their masks and it spreads whatever is being filtered. It's a collection device for microbes and you are wearing it on your face. A better questions is, how many people are lost because of untrained mask use? I bet it's higher than any protection given.
@@piquat1 people sucking hard for air and sucking down the microplastics, sad to see it
but governments and top medical scientists don't know anything about this, no
@@liahk1000 sorry i tried to send a reply but youtube keeps deleting it, i suspect my social credit score isn't high enough, regards
yes. yes these things. _JC
Only young men showed up to be diagnosed with myocarditis because they were still exerting themselves whereas women and older aged persons felt poor enough to rest. I still contend that spike proteins related inflammation probaby occurs at the same rate for all persons with a similarly responding immune system regardless of sex or age. Further vaccine studies should include obtaining serial tests of heart inflammatory markers for days 3 to 9 in all study participants!
Dr. Prasad, what's your hunch that low dose aspirin-now no longer routinely recommended for hear attack preventions-should again be recommended, in light of the wide prevalence of COVID exposure and COVID vaccination?
Fun fact, phlebotomy actually extends life and it’s a good way to get rid of pfas and extra iron and other junk. However not a great idea as treatment for acute illness.
Might as well sauna to get rid of heavy metals, what data are you basing that on?
@@MyPerennial www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8994130/, th-cam.com/video/Re9piRz9ny8/w-d-xo.htmlsi=DekI7Jyta4Rmnkei
Seems like that failure rate for meds and procedures has been going down lately huh? Unless it's cheap, safe and deserves an honest try - then it doesn't stand a chance.
Should an American citizen, over age 65 and who has multiple comorbities and who ALREADY has had three COVID-19 vaccinations plus one documented bout of COVID-19 illness get the 2024 booster? To be more specific, is there ANY "rock solid" scientific data that supports such a recommendation?🔬
No, there is not.
@@DylanYoung Thank you, Dylan.
@@JMK-vo8pvhow are you not joking
id recomend NONE get it since its diffrent per batch and some are near saline and some are stright poision. idk maby it would help someone who has ZERO immunity and then atlest give covid immunity, but if you got a working immunue system then take it, it causes your immunue system to ONLY wpork with that PACIFIC strain of "Covid" and all other strains of "covid" and "influemnczia" and other common alaments all suddenly will have ZERO immunity to it. the better your immune system the WORSE the covid vaccine hits.
why no comments
Video was just uploaded...
Whats the difference if it expires on the shelf or in the arm??? & forced at a Cancer hospital 🤔🤔
❤🎉🇦🇺
Vinay, it is not correct to state "there was no population level immunity". 99.5% of humans who came into contact with SCV2 were just fine, even in year one. This indicated that for most of us, our immune system was totally capable of dealing with this virus. Only those with severe comorbidités failed. Our immune systems could deal, because this virus was sufficiently similar to previous coronaviruses that our immune systems were generally capable.