OJ25 Episode 17 - The TRUE Story of the OJ Simpson Trial (Court TV Docuseries)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ธ.ค. 2020
- #ojsimpsontrial #ojsimpson #nicolebrownsimpson #rongoldman #truecrime #courttv #OJ25
The defense uses bloody socks found in O.J. Simpson's bedroom to further their claim that police are trying to frame their client.
© 2020 Court TV Media LLC, part of The E.W. Scripps Company.
![[안방1열 풀캠4K] 베이비몬스터 'FOREVER' (BABYMONSTER FullCam)│@SBS Inkigayo 240707](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_2HL-ogzzBU/mqdefault.jpg)
![[4K] BABYMONSTER(베이비몬스터) “FOREVER” Band LIVE Concert “영원히” 베몬만을 사랑하게 되…💗 [it’s KPOP LIVE 잇츠라이브]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TQfC0xdpiw4/mqdefault.jpg)
This series is going to be my bedtime every night for quite a while
Ditto. lol 😂
😂 and me too.
Same, watch oj the lost confession tapes here on TH-cam. Eye opening
@@the-finn Paid six million.
It was for me.
Not being able to figure out how to tape off the bronco is the most egregious thing in the whole case. Get some traffic cones man
This has been great to watch
A recurring theme in all of these episodes is how the cops and the prosecution think it is so very unfair that the defense can match them in resources. They hate that, since they are used to trying their cases in front of public defenders, who either don't care, or work with such limited resources that they go out of their way to get their defendants to plea to a lesser charge in order to risk conviction because they are hopelessly outmatched by the prosecution. Think about that. This is what it is like to be poor in America. If you get charged by the police, you are going to prison. These cops and these prosecutors can't stand that they had to play on a level playing field because these defenders could match them dollar for dollar.
yeah it's like they think plaintiffs don't deserve a real defense.
Very well said.
No, its simpler than that. OJ got off because the majority of the jurors were black. Nothing Johnny Cochran and the defense said made any sense. Looking back, the defense never disproved any of the evidence. The "jury" already had a preconceived notion as to how they were going to vote.
@@starter47990 wrong it made perfect lying nazi troll and they did in fact disproved plenty of it and no the jury did not have a preconceived notion at all lying POS, my god you are brain-dead.
@@Chad_Max OJ did not murder anyone.
I lost all respect for Darden for a lot of things but what sealed the deal was when he said Simpson had well financed attorneys.
California spent 16 million dollars prosecuting Simpson and lost.
It sounds like Darden is saying well it’s not fair we are only use to prosecuting people who can’t afford to defend themselves.
BP. That is a great observation. That is certainly something to consider. It was something that he knew would be very difficult because the Defense Attorney's were no push overs.
yeah Darden is such a blatant race traitor that it sickens me.
just confirms the entire thing. If you get charged and you are not rich you WILL lose. Best case is a plea.
The game is rigged
@@drointhewind480 prisons is gov't $$$$$ maker
That is just California, doesn't count all the FBI experts they used on the case and brought to testify, probably surpasses $20 million
If the prosecution’s theory was that OJ disposed his bloody garments and shoes 👞 at LAX…then why tf would he just leave the bloody socks 🧦 at his home 🏡?!?
Or one bloody glove behind the house.
The prosecution thinks OJ threw away the knife at the airport and that he had given his clothes to Robert Kardashian at his mansion in the bag that Kardashian was seen taken from OJ's house. Maybe OJ forgot about the socks or thought they were fine because they were a dark color and probably didn't see the small specks of blood due to that reason. The glove at Nicoles was probably pulled off during the struggle with Ron and the other glove OJ probably dropped when he was climbing over the fence by Kato's room on accident. They never thought he threw away his clothes at the airport, just the knife. Since Robert Kardashian is dead only he and OJ know what was in the bag that Kardashian took from OJs home.
@@tara1darby More hogwash.
@@tara1darby Your story proved OJ innocent.
@@tara1darby Well the Jurors were brilliant,you are not.The juros stated with experts looking for blood with special lighting,they should have seen it first time.Now explain how did the blood got on those socks got to the third side.Was it while OJ had them on.?????
It amazing that if Furman noticed blood on/in the Bronco early in the morning when they first arrived still dark outside that they let the Bronco sit there for what another 12 hours before being taken to impound? It should have been protected and towed away immediately
That’s because there was no blood there in the first place.
@@bighomiemac3472 there was blood on the driver's side door, big dogg.
@@johnp82 -Wrong,that was allegedly blood,never tested,untill today,it's unknown.It shoul've been a mixture of all three parties blood,at least OJs'.
@@johnp82 -That smear was the probable cause to scale the fence.
@@johnp82 Fuhrman put that smear on the door. John.
You can tell when Darden is about to do something stupid because Clarke stares at him with a deer in headlights look
A lawyer in a courtroom can't afford to make mistakes. As a wise lawyer once said: "A lawyer isn't in court to do his or her best, the lawyer is there to win!"
Holy cow. These attorneys must have ages 10 years going thru this bs
Holy cow,it was 25 yr's ago.
I agree Cathy. I said, also that the amount of stress they had to endure for a full year was off the chain. Also, that is another reason why the Jury took less than 3.5 hours to come back with their decision. They too, had aged.
@@andrerobinson2923 There was no evidence for them to sift through.
@@philipwilliams1754 What?
There was a lot of evidence they needed to discuss.
This bunch of idiots was biased by the race card Cochran played.
That confused common sense.
And this rediculous gloves smear comedy.
" If it don' t fit you must acquit" BS.
@@lesterpaul9657 Care to tell me the evidence.
My condolences to the families because no one should be done the way these people were done .
I feel for them to, OJ got away with this and had an easy life playing golf and giving ridicoulus interviews afterwards.
@@luskapani9905 Have you thought Ron was the intended victim.
@@philipwilliams1754 I don’t know, he may have been. Have you seen the if I did it interview? OJ said : there was this guy going into karate thing, so he thought : you wanna kick MY ass??? And so it went on.
@@luskapani9905 except for that stint of jail time he did for setting up and violently robbing some memorabilia collectors at gun point...The Juice was charged and found guilty on all 12 counts. They gave him 33 years in prison with eligibility for parole in 9 years. He got locked up in December 2008. He was released from prison on October 1, 2017. So 9 years behind bars which wasn't enough. I've always wondered what his kids think and if he has a relationship with them. I want to say they both did a interview one time. There's also rumors that OJ Simpson is one of the Kardashians father's. Chloe is the one that looks nothing like the other full Kardashian girls and the father was one of OJs good friends. Cause OJs factual daughter looks sooooo much like Chloe Kardashian. Look them up
especially since OJ was wrongfully accused
Apparently , the murder suspect was smart enough to discard the murder weapon, bloody clothes and shoes, but not the socks....Apparently, the murder suspect left a pair of dirty, bloody socks openly on a white rug (for many hours) in an otherwise tidy bedroom. Apparently, the cow jumped over the moon......
@b blacker- Well said! None of that adds up! Also, notice how blood was never found on the white carpet of the stairs leading up to his bedroom that logically would of been there IF OJ walked up those stairs wearing bloody socks. Also there were no traces of blood on the floor at the front door entrance both inside and outside the house. Here's another thing in regard to the black gloves. OJ had a significant cut on one of his index fingers but yet there were NO corresponding CUTS on that glove's fingers. WHY??? If it doesn't FIT you must ACQUIT!!!
😆😆😆💯
@@archangelvvv Bro. Jerry, it was just too many strange things going on and the defense went on the offense. They were called the Dream Team but they should have been called "The Hole Punchers."
yeah it's funny how people like Kim got on the defense for trying to argue the cops were both inept and cunning, when in reality that's not what the defense was saying, they were saying the lead detectives wanted to frame Simpson while the patrol officers didn't care about preserving the integrity of the crime scene, yet those people like the Goldmans fail to account for how OJ could be smart enough to dispose of the murder weapon yet inept enough to leave the gloves behind.
Apparently, you are an idiot
So sad theres isnt an episode for each day. I would watch 120 episodes if they had that many. Lol
Ron Goldman's father is obviously upset about his son's murder and I completely understand. I just don't see the point in having these segments of him making remarks about events during the trial. The man could have proof in front of his face that the crime scene was tampered with and he still wouldn't believe it.
Absolutely!!
I 100% agree with you. I watched the whole trial I think OJ did not do it.
@@sofialavish1072 You think he didn’t do it? You probably need to stop thinking then, because it’s dangerous for the rest of us.
Simpson was placed in handcuffs because he butchered Nicole and Ron...Period!!!!!!
That's the worst Investigation of Forensic and Detective work I ever seen. Nothing is done correctly from the start.
100% CORRECT on ALL levels of the Investigation! A total & complete BOTCH JOB from beginning to end! How about the absurd matter of the LAPD Detective who was driving around L.A. with OJs blood sample in his pocket i.e. the test tube drawn on OJ at the crime lab and that test tube had 1.5 cc's of blood missing from the original 5 cc volume of that EDTA Hematology tube!
@@archangelvvv I believe they must have missed training every time in forensic school it's embarrassing how they proceed in this case. I truly feel so sorry for the victims who have been brutalized and don't get justice.
Because it's all messed up.
So true. It is very sad. Don't want to know what other cases have been done by them.
Juror #6 sounds like a smart guy but I just can’t get past the stupidity of the blatantly obvious in this case
When being a juror on the case you can only entertain the evidence introduced… No speculation allowed at least we hope not.
only one with stupidity here was the prosecution fool
The stupidity of the blatantly obvious what?? You comment makes no sense.
Anyone paying attention to the testimonies evidence and arguments in this trial should have voted not guilty.
@@Berkmugga nup.
The reporters were allowed around the Bronco and to use it as a cupholder? Oh for f**k's sake!
Police tape can't touch the bronco but reporters can
Lance Ito and the LA DA office dropped the ball all over this case! It became personal. Jonny, Robert, Alan, F.Lee, Barry really was a dream team they poked holes into everything The State presented. Creating reasonable doubt with led to Oj’s acquittal!!
They were anything but the dream team. Cochrane was a trial lawyer in civil cases. He never tried a criminal case before this one. Shapiro was a plea bargainer. Dershowitz was an appellate lawyer and law professor. F Lee Bailey distinguished himself as a lawyer, but before this case, he hadn't won a case in years. The rest of his lawyers, what was so special about them? This label of the Dream Team, was just made up by the media.
That juror #6 is a fool
nah he's smart, you're the fool.
Explain.
@@Yorktown48 black panther.
To believe the conspiracy, how would the LA PD have known he didn’t have a lock tight alibi
Furhman knew OJ took a flght that eve, per Kato.
@@Jim.Jim.32how?
@@BushidoVXX Jim is full of BS. He lies.
@@BushidoVXXHe immediately went over to OJ's house, jumped the fence, ran to Kato and Arnelle and interviewed them and asked where was OJ and what was he doing that day/night. As for air tight alibi, OJ did have not only one, but multiple, he was in the limo when the ice cream melt rate demonstrates the murders happened. The prosecutor just glosses over inconvenient truths like alibis, and the time of death clearly being after 10:35 [which is when all the neighbours hear the screams and see the fights].
They planted that evidence like a week after the murders…. Some evidence was collected 2 months later!!!
I like how the defense is like: EVERYTHING IS A LIE!
That was basically all they had
Most of it was a lie. The LAPD planted evidence. Proven 100 percent.
@@jpenir and it worked!
@@bloopnation I know. OJ got off at the right time. Luckily they got him at the Civil trial
@@Jim.Jim.32 You really think they soaked up blood from Bundy and sprinkled it at OJ's place NOT knowing if he had an alibi or not? Get real.
And you can handcuff someone and not arrest them. He could be detained and handcuffed.
Darden got played he let his feeling show
Got played like a fiddle.
Waay to emotional
I feel bad for him. He was in the middle of a race war basically it seems and was probably being seen and talked about as a traitor, yet he knew OJ was guilty.
@@ashleymcmeakin8590 Whom knew OJ was guilty.????
@@philipwilliams1754 phillip...were discussing Chris...
Everything is so white perfect all over the house...except some bloody socks perfectly laid out on white carpet....🤐
Seems odd, doesn't it?
That and the ice cream plays a crucial role for the timeline.
That is really, really strange.
Those dummy cops really planted those socks😂
And, Cochran really bribed a witness to lie on the stand about the Bronco.
@@pommiebears where is he proof that Johnnie Cochran bribed the witness? But there was 100% proof of EDTA in OJ's blood that was so called collected by the LAPD.
OJ was arguing with her and she said something. He had knife and pulled it just to scare her and ended up slashing at her. Then he realized he had finish job. Goldman was caught off guard.
Looks like Karma got the dream team. As of now only 2 are still alive
Shapiro, Scheck, Neufeld, Blaiser, Dershowitz, Uelman, Douglas, Chapman all still alive
Karma come on people die .what a silly thing to say
Ummm, you would be wrong, Shapiro, sheck, Douglass, jersawich, Sean, are all still alive
You would be wrong, Shapiro, scheck, Sean, jersawich, Douglass are all still alive and f Lee Bailey just died recently at the age of the age of 90 so get your facts straight
Did that judge ever hold anyone "in contempt" during this trial?
It seems like he sure did threaten to a lot.
I was thinking the same
I think he fined Darden & Clark a few times mounting in 3000$ I believe Cochrane & Bailey were fined
Yes. Mostly Marcia. Her harassment of witnesses that didn't fit her agenda got so bad that judge Ito told her to stop.
She😮 was too 😢sure of herself .
@@nattyps3160u are correct
It’s shocking how much time was dedicated to such unrelated and useless testimony
Not really if you can't trust tge people collecting the evidence or investigating you can't trust the case cops and prosecutors should of done a better job .. Darden and the lady were way over there heads in this case to high profile for them
No matter how much we all know he’s guilty, I honestly couldn’t find him guilty either with all the ways they mishandled the evidence and things like those socks not being shown in that video. I mean that clearly shows that evidence had to have been planted 🤦🏽♂️
Framed.
@@philipwilliams1754 absolutely!!
I actually don’t think he did it.
How many of y’all believe his son did it… alone or with OJ?
@@thrillwillent OJ and his family had nothing to do with the murders.
The police weren’t looking for prints. It was ORENTHALS vehicle. So, of course, his prints were there. BLOOD BLOOD BLOOD!
Why did they take that blood back to the crime scene ? Why did they take that blood back to the crime scene ? Do you see how that looks ? The criminalist said himself that he had never seen that before in the ten years he was employed .
@Victorious Light- Well said! Like I said why was a LAPD Detective driving around L.A. with an test tube of OJs blood in his pocket drawn at the crime lab downtown?? That's so ridiculous and absurd it's not even funny. This was a BOLD DESPERATE ACT OF A CORRUPT COP ON A MISSION to plant evidence at the crime scene and there's just no getting around it!
Furhman himself was pissed at Vannatter for doing that as taking evidence home with you is something cops are not supposed to do.
8:25 Ito should have fined JC $500 right there for his comment, weak
37:00 Ito should have been fined for that very offensive comment............
wrong nazi troll
The socks on the bedroom carpet, in my opinion, are being blocked by the edge of the bed. They only show that one small portion of the carpet. If the video at any point showed the entire carpet, I imagine they would have used that shot in court. The photo of the socks show them much farther from the edge of the carpet than we would be able to see in the video.
The physical evidence was conclusive: Simpson’s blood was dripped at the murder scene; a cap with hairs matching his was found next to Ron’s and Nicole’s dead bodies; one of Simpson’s large leather gloves was lying between them; and the matching glove, still holding strands of the victims’ hair and stained with their blood and Simpson’s, was found outside his house. Size-twelve shoe prints, slightly pigeon-toed, were clearly stamped in the victims’ blood, at the murder scene. Simpson is among the 9 percent of the population who wears size-twelve shoes, and he is pigeon-toed. Those shoe prints made an impression that was matched to one sole in the world-a Silga sole, manufactured at the Silga factory in Civitinova Marche, Italy, for the upscale shoemaker Bruno Magli.
(Plaintiffs lawyers in the civil trial found pictures of Simpson wearing Bruno Magli shoes with the identical soles.)
Simpson's white Ford Bronco, parked outside his house, contained not only Simpson’s blood but Ron’s and Nicole’s, and a shoe impression consistent with the Bruno Magli stained the carpet on the driver’s side. A trail of Simpson’s blood was dripped up his driveway, into his house, and up to his bedroom and bathroom.
Planting of that blood was out of the question-because, just like the blood at the murder scene, it was found long before police investigators had taken any blood from his arm.
Simpson had cuts all over his hands the day after the murders but had no explanation for how he got them.
His socks were lying on his bedroom floor, spattered with his blood and Nicole’s. Blue black cotton fibers consistent with a dark sweatsuit were found at both the crime scene and in Simpson’s home, linking him to both locations.
Rare carpet fibers of the type used in his Bronco were found at the murder scene. His blood, his cuts, his clothing, his gloves, his shoes, his car, his house, his ex-wife’s blood, Ron Goldman’s blood . . . all pointed to O.J. Simpson-and to no one else.
No bizarre or speculative theories about individual pieces of evidence, such as the defence proposed, could possibly overcome all the evidence. Or even the strongest pieces of it.
There is no logical explanation that accounts for the evidence, no explanation acceptable to a reasonable, objective person, except that OJ Simpson killed the victims. He is guilty. Case closed.
Excellent analysis. Also watch vince bugliosis video oj 100% guilty & anyone will come away convinced. The prosecution was God awful. Unforgivable all the evidence they didn't put in yet spent weeks on dna the jury threw out anyway. In the Civil case it was clearly & easily Spoon fed explained in a paragraph what dna is & it works. Also helps that judge refused to allow the race card to be played come on ojs own bff Robert Kardashian gave Barbara Walter's an interview saying he had " doubts " b/c of the lord evidence. This guy was a lawyer in name only on the defense. He was there just to babysit Simpson as an old friend he had to renew his law liscense & I read he also did this to avoid being questioned by the d.a. their was something Shapiro had said to him about him possibly being charged. Some speculate he may have as a friend at the start who believed his old friend certain things that were illegal. Point is he dropped oj & I guess was being polite & careful as am attorney on the case even though he never really did anything never even asked a question but him saying the blood evidence made him have serious doubts tells u he knew it wasn't planted & he also said that as well he never believed that crap . Another thing is why would furhman planting a glove not knowing if oj had an airtight alibi
Literally everything you wrote is untrue.
@@Jim.Jim.32 Lol. Compelling argument ! Case dismissed ! Leading defense attorney "Jim Jim" has magically made the evidence disappear. A powerful argument. Rhetoric worthy of the finest legal minds.
"Literally everything you wrote is untrue".
Legal scholars will be citing that for centuries. It's so simple and so elegant, yet so full of force and conviction. Cicero himself would be in awe of the great "Jim Jim".
Why didn't OJ hire YOU ? Who needs a Dream Team when you've got Jim Jim ? OJ could have saved so much time and money, if all he needed to do, was hire Jim Jim.
Jim Jim, the only lawyer who took "brief" to mean "write 6 words". Lol. Top work. You'll be Chief Justice of the Supreme Court one day. With argument like that, it's a guarantee.
The media used it as a coffee table .. wtf 😳
Police tape can't touch the bronco but reporters can
One of the biggest loop holes in the courts goes something like this:
“did mans seem distraught and disheveled?”
OBJECTION,
“How did mans seem?”
Planting those seeds are so impressionable
The picture of the socks in OJs room are NOT on a “white” carpet .. they are clearly laying on what appears to be a oriental carpet that is of different colors .. this oriental carpet is NOT in the photos the msn took .. had someone placed a carpet ontop of a rug? The house keeper appeared to be nervous and anxiety and wanted to leave the country pretty quickly .. was she paid to do a “few” things before she left ?!! I can only hear Johnny saying right now objection your honor .. way to many things overlooked
If this trial would have been held in Santa Monica like it should have been, it would have lasted a month and OJ would be in prison for life without parole.
Yeah, I've always said the smartest thing the dream- team did was move the trial to Los Angeles county✔️
this was done to prevent riots. Better to have OJ put away by a BLACK jury. LAPD thought they had a solid case. Cost them millions. Thats why OJ was put away in Vegas. Payback for '94
@@blessedmslady7341The defense has no say on where a trial is held you dummy lol. Thats strictly the district attorneys call.
How dumb can you be? Lol.
@@blessedmslady7341Pretty sure Santa Monica IS in L.A. County. Downtown L.A. you meant.
The same Santa Monica grand jury who voted 18-0 to not indict OJ for lack of probable cause.
If he had on gloves , how'd he cut his finger ? If he had on gloves , how'd he cut his finger ? There wasn't a cut on the finger of the glove . A paper cut will trickle blood for awhile and you may have to place a bandaid on it . He shook hands and signed autographs , yet , no one remembers seeing a Johnson and Johnson bandaid .
It most likely fell off during the scrum with Ron, that’s why it was found AT the scene.
Yes. Ron wrenched the glove from his hand during the struggle.
@Victorious Light- RIGHT! I just posted the same exact thing just minutes before reading this post! Yeah, cut on OJs index finger but NOT on the corresponding index finger of the black glove! This all by itself is PROOF OJ didn't commit those murders! This proves it was NOT OJ's hands wearing those black gloves AND that was further proven based on the fact that those gloves didn't come anywhere close to fitting OJs hands that he openly showed the entire court. I saw an interview of Robert Shaprio on TH-cam recently where he discussed that he personally attempted to try on those gloves unsuccessfully in that he as NOT able to pull them completely onto either one of his hands and then he stated quote: "OJs hands are MUCH LARGER than mine."
Thats right .....
He lost it at the crime scene during the struggle. He cut his left fingers when he slashed their throats open. The left glove was dropped there. The right hand glove was on and held the knife and was later on lost back at his home.
Boy, those socks really screwed everything up, didn't they? There's a good time travel episode for a sitcom there. You know, our heroes travel back in time and someone grabs socks and puts them on, then realises they're _those_ socks and tries to clean them and put them back...
Adrian Colley-Which trial was that.
Bro. Adrian, I thought that the socks along with other "Huge Holes" the defense drilled in the prosecution case just showed that their "minds were not as prepared as the defenses'."
The difference between this officer and those directly involved with this case Thompson dosen't lie.
Unlike his fellow officer's.
Its amazing how long it took Darden to realize he was just window dressing in this case.
OJ was a suspect the moment they knew it was Nicole Brown Simpson at 12:15am......by 1:00am it was definently a positive identity; all this they didn't know it was Nicole Brown Simpson was just more LA bull$#!+....hours of standing around before they went to notify OJ Simpson house or maybe they had already went? That's why nobody took accurate notes of what they did at any given time, no notes from Vanatter, Phillips, Lang or Fuhrman that where adequate as to what they were doing!!!!???!!!
Fhurman and Roberts were already at Rockingham.Rosa told Fhurman,about the noise in OJs yard,the Bronco never left.
@@philipwilliams1754 that's why he never reported going to the Salazar's house that Rosa Lopez worked at. Even denying that he couldn't make out her voice. Fuhrman new he was in trouble when he saw her on the news. The defense team strategy was to force the prosecution team to defend Mark Fuhrman and every police officer in this case even after he pleaded the fifth amendment, not because he used racial epithets, but because he said he would frame a Black person or find something to make an arrest on those tapes. They would have to fire every white cop in America and Black one's too🤣 no police officer in America would ever be put on trial for calling Black people racial slurs. It was the planting of evidence that made Fuhrman pleaded the fifth amendment. Ms Clark had to know about Mark Fuhrman, but never dreamed that the defense attorneys were investigating the detectives who were involved in this case and yet they continued to lie. How could they expect the Jurors to believe the evidence collected by these people who obviously were trying to share the arrest of OJ Simpson, because this was the trial of the century. I can't believe that Lang and Fuhrman were stupid enough to allow themselves to be interviewed 25 years later, their worst then ever now their blaming the prosecution team 25 years later. 🤣🤣🤣
When Mark Fuhrman says, and I quote (bringing race into the trial was like bringing in sexual preference as a motive)......what the #u@k is he talking about 25 years later after planting that glove........
My GOD, he fled and went into hiding! How stupid.
Explain.
@@TDKiller415 So once he got to Mexico ,no one would recognise him.
@@TDKiller415 The things you mentioned were in his travel bag.
Shipiro put the entire legal team together!
When asked about a police frame up-Fred Goldman: "Police first on the scene found ONE glove. There wasn't a glove that appeared or disappeared."
Why is the bronco parked on the street 🤷
Question is and was never answered….who parked Bronco when oj left for airport
At the preliminary hearing Van testified he immediately he immediately took the cuffs off, at trial they had to explain something to him which was a negotiation for the cuffs to come off.
Vannatter was on Howerd Sterns agreeing he knew he was guilty that night, contradicting his testimony.
(13) OJ Simpson Lead Investigators Tom Lange and Philip Vannatter - TH-cam
So because the tow driver didn’t see blood means the pictures from the DAY BEFORE are not true????? This is so stupid
Blood in the Bronco recovered in August.
exactly
yes your post is stupid
How do you know the "blood" is even blood?
#6 thinks too much, without actually thinking….paralysis of analysis
Exactly. Cryer took 600 pages of notes that consist mainly of absolute nonsense.
Cochran was a fast talker but in reality he played the race card every time. Slimeball lawyer.
He was handcuffed when he got home. You bet- there was blood all over the place and a blood covered blod found on his property.
If there was blood whose was it .
@@philipwilliams1754 - OJ’s and those two people he killed. They had days and days worth of testimony on it…even broke it down to the molecular level. You should see all these episodes, the blood evidence is overwhelming.
@@sangertx9077 I watched all of it,all they had was the blood he gave them.
@@sangertx9077 All that testimony,and no one saw him at the murder scene,bleeding in LA,his Bronco at the murder scene.His prints not in the Bronco nor at the crime scene. The only evidence they had was his blood.
"He told me to placed the defendant in handcuffs." 1:45 Thomas
He turned his back on the on the Bronco to walk after Simpson, thus the car was deemed, abandoned evidence.
"Then he was ask to come downtown and talk to the police - maybe not asked., told." Johnny
Glen Rodgers killed them dumb ass look it up on you tube full confessions from the killer and his family along with law enforcement
Johnny was a professional liar. And no one told this cop to cuff Simpson. It was Vannatter who ordered him uncuffed. And Simpson could have had a lawyer but sent him for lunch.
@@ingurlund9657 The officer that hand cuffed Simpson,testified Vannatter instructed him to do so.
This is a joke. An entire police dept, several labs and workers and etc have motive to frame an innocent man with no gain for themselves? What would they gain from it being OJ or anyone else?! Give me a break.
@@ashleymcmeakin8590 There was no massive conspiracy,all it took was a little bit of blood from his vial.1.5 cc's is missing from his vial.
*shows video of carpet clearly 80% blocked by the bed*
“Do YoU SeE tHe SoCkS?!”
It’s amazing how fucking stupid and pathetic this entire case was
11:49 and then there's the truth according to you Johnnie
It was a case of a strong defense team consisting of a bunch of highly skilled liars, against a weak prosecution team. I remember Chris Darden saying to the jury something like „Your decision is not an easy one to make..“. That is like saying to them „There is reasonable doubt, so you must acquit“. Instead, he should have said „The defense suggest that your decision is difficult, but when you look at the evidence, in reality it is not. Blood matching the defendant‘s was found at the crime scene, in- and on his car, on his driveway, in his house and on his socks in his house. Furthermore, an imprint of Mr Simpson‘s expensive and rare Bruno Magli shoes was found at the crime scene. The defense is trying to divert your attention away from these facts. There can be no doubt that the defendant is guilty of savagely murdering his wife and her friend, and it is your duty to deliver your verdict based on this irrefutable evidence“. Everybody knows who killed Nicole and Ron : It was Orenthal James Simpson (but he is such a nice guy..🤮🤮🤮).
Yes, darden's closing argument sounded apologetic and therefore weak.
Darden really appears agitated, angry, argumentative and easily offended. It seems like the judge, opposing counsel, his own colleagues and even the states witnesses have beef with him. I’m sure the jury felt the same way about him as well.
What a bunch of BALONEY!!! All of OJ's blood had EDTA in it. Too damn much EDTA!! How did it get in the blood? Please explain why the FBI even said their unqualified lab worker, Roger Martz, skewed blood work towards the prosecution.
In my view, two things are true. Simpson is the mostly likely suspect and evidence was manufactured in an attempt to solidify the case against him.
Very proud of Officer Thompson. He was doing his job. And ORENTHAL was not cuffed within 30-45 seconds upon arrival as you can plainly see him walking up the drive uncuffed. Just getting out of a limo or cab takes 30-45 seconds…not to mention the various pieces of luggage. Of which at least one Robert Kardashian eventually made off with.
Ummm when OJ is walking up the driveway you can clearly see the cop grab his arm to start cuffing him. Just sayin. I think OJ was 100% guilty btw.
shame
22:36 this was a very messy job and all he expect us to believe is he is guilty based off of these smidges of blood
Yes. That’s how DNA works. If you weren’t there, your DNA wouldn’t be there either.
@@pommiebears Those specs were planted.
I really do get why they ruled not guilty. If you’ve never been on a jury, you’re instructed for beyond a reasonable doubt. There was enough doubt raised in this case. I can see it. I think he definitely did it but the integrity of the scene and physical evidence is bad…
12 coming ND going
The glove 🧤 being “found” on OJs property is problematic for me because of this…….
1. A glove is NOT an accessory that you “lose”’ and don’t notice. It’s not a earring or chain/necklace
*with that being said….leads me to the next question 🙋🏾♂️*
2. The theory is that he lost 1 glove in a struggle with Ron Goldman. Ok…I can see that….HOWEVER, explain to me WHY IN THE HELL would he do 1 of 2 things
a. WALK away from the scene with ONE ☝🏾 “BLOOD SOAKED” glove on?
ORz
b. Take the other glove off at the scene of the murders and shove it in his pocket!?!? 🤔 🤨 WHY?!? He surely would have noticed the other glove missing….he didn’t have enough time to look for the missing glove and decided 🤷🏾♂️ 💭 fuck it….I’ll just keep the other one *instead of taking the “Rockingham” glove off and leaving it there too!!!?!
Good questions. The real problem with the prosecutions theories is that they are not based on the true facts of the murders.
When we examine Ron Goldman's hands, we see bruises, as if he landed fist blows in that physical struggle he was said to have with O. J. However, on the photo of O. J. stripped to his underwear there were no bruises found on him, nor any evidence that he'd been in a physical altercation with anyone.
Naysayers won't talk about that.
He likely wasn't thinking too clearly about what evidence he had left behind. He was more concerned about fleeing the scene without being recognized, and then rushing home to a waiting limo so he could appear to have been at home preparing for the trip to Chicago, rather than viciously butchering two people, which he absolutely did. Chris Darden's book "In Contempt" is a great read. OJ is the one and only person responsible folks. He got away with murder. How shameful.
@@NkrumahTure Well said!
@@bobjohnson406 WRONG! Why was a significant cut found on OJs index finger but NOT on the index finger of either one of those black gloves??? EXPLAIN THAT! A razor sharp knife that was able to slash two people to ribbons would certainly be sharp enough to make a corresponding slash mark on the glove's finger that was deep enough to make a cut mark on OJs finger. Again EXPLAIN THAT!!!
@@archangelvvv The finger laceration occurred after the glove came off in the struggle, likely with Ron Goldman. The preponderance of evidence that OJ is the murderer is overwhelming, unless you choose to ignore basic facts and science. The idea of an agency-wide conspiracy to frame him is laughable. After savagely killing two people, he was more concerned about fleeing than finding a missing glove in the darkness.
The evidence was inside the Bronco. Not on the hood. I’d even toss the tiny smudge of blood above the driver door. INSIDE…is where the IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE WAS.
With all the Evidence in this case two people brutally killed n yet this man walked free..wat a world
The fact that the defence just goes after questioning everything to the least detail just shows they don't have a concrete defense for this guy.....Which makes it clear for any observer - with a logic in his head - that this guy is guilty beyond any doubt.
they actually had a very concrete defence: police misconduct and or framing. The fact that they ask to the least detail is just standard good lawyering and should show that they have a genuine interest in what happened. If their questions were irellevant the procecution could object
@@tobak952 The fact u used the word "OR" shows that it is actually concrete.
@@W.Khairi yes it is actually concrete. Also i said "and or" because at the very least police misconduct happened, and very possibly framing.
@@tobak952 I hope u can see thru ur wording - the use of -very least & very possibly- that u r just confirming what I have said.
@@W.Khairi you do realize that all the defence has to proove is reasonable doubt, right? like.. you do know how criminal trials work? yes?
look at the jury pool
Why is that not his peers. Or is it they are black ? Educate me . Years upon years whites have sat in judgment of black Hispanic. Citizen and nothing was said so please educate me I just want to know why that statement
@@medwards3156 he was beyond rich, the people of the jury, not. Social status totally different. OJ never would have suffered the discrimination that those people probably suffered
@@alyssamiller6292 -They framed him,EDTA in the blood.
@@alyssamiller6292 -You wanted an all white Jury.??
@@alyssamiller6292 -So the Rodney King Jury was blind and dumb.
Perfect circle droplets of blood lol 😂 not even a splash form to it
Magazine was the most onest.
Every time I see mark furhman I cringe…. Get that criminal off my screen
The police are comprised
I assumed press
Can’t believe no mistrial
All suspects are “detained”. “Arrested” is a separate issue. The FIRST suspect in ANY MURDER…mom, dad, sister, brother…is IMMEDIATE FAMILY. In the case of a spouse or former spouses death, the parent/parents of a deceased child…those are your FIRST SUSPECTS. WITH GOOD REASON.
I knew he'd done it the morning after.
9:17 YOU GOT THAT RIGHT 13:33 20:10 No Blood and Juror 29:55 42:15 EDTA IN SOCK
Can’t comment the truth….
15 press pass
29 anything out of the ordinary...
Actually you don’t lock the steering wheel for towing. Unnecessary…as front wheels are raised and not on the pavement during transport. If a standard it is put in “neutral”. So there’s one lie. No matter WHICH side benefits. It’s all a matter of finding the TRUTH. Which every juror ignored, with every fiber of their being.
You see the EDGE of a rug. No white rug directly below the foot of the bed. Which is where the socks would have been if he had sat his inferior ass on the bed to remove them. “Dey black…ain’t nobody gone see no blood” - ORENTHALS demented thoughts
What about Mary Ann Gerchas, who was a maid that worked for a residence across the street from O.J.'s house on Rockingham who said she saw his Bronco being tampered with one night? Anybody rermember that?
She said she saw a strange man doing something at the door handle of that Ford Bronco.
Right. Evidence tampering. Blood samples from the police lab.
No, not accurate. Gerchas, a known criminal and discredited defense ploy, never testified and was removed from the witness list because of her lack of credibility and history of fraud. Also, she was supposedly across from Bundy, not Rockingham. You're convaluting facts with reality. Folks, OJ Simpson is the one and only murderer.
@@bobjohnson406 No one testified they saw OJ bleeding in LA.
@@philipwilliams1754 I cut my finger at work last week. It bled quite a bit. I rinsed it and then applied pressure for 15 minutes. The bleeding stopped and I went about my day and interacting with people. None of then knew I was bleeding shortly beforehand.
@@bobjohnson406 In the OJ case,he almost bleed to death.His blood at the crime scene was found ,not mixed with anyone.
EDTA expert testimony. Take that Mr. GOLDMAN, got to see both sides of the trial not just a blind sided guilty verdict.
ICYMI, this series doesn’t show the whole trial. Clearly, you didn’t watch the whole trial, look at the evidence, or learn about EDTA. If you did, you’d know that the defense’s witnesses’ claims about EDTA were debunked and were forced to admit that not only was EDTA still used in food, it is found in the French fries and Big Mac that Simpson ate approximately one hour before the murders. They admitted that the samples in question did not contain a level of EDTA that was close to levels from a purple top tube. And admitted that EDTA could not be identified from a presumptive test and the identification test was inconclusive, meaning it could not even be EDTA at all. And Reiders admitted to lying about falsely quoting an EPA article about EDTA levels. And admitted that another witness was hired by the defense to conduct another ID test of the samples for EDTA (Ballard) but chose to not have him testify as to what the results were.
Further, Dr. Rieders (defense forensic toxicologist) testified at the civil trial in 1996, admitting during cross-exam "this might not be blood from a purple top tube" (EDTA) and that the results could be false positives as Martz would later demonstrate. The claim of EDTA on the sock coming from Nicole‘s reference vial was conclusively disproved by Dr. Cotton who showed the DNA in the reference vial was more degraded than the DNA on the sock, proving it could not have come from that vial. And the glove found at Rockingham never tested positive for EDTA.
🌈 💫 The more you know.
@@blue-calla The Defense called Roger Martz and Reiders.Nothing was debunked,EDTA was in the blood.If there's any in your blood,it came from a test tube.
@@blue-calla The FDA approves parts per billion,in our foods.Parts per million in the blood.Martz claimed he found 1000 parts per million in his blood.Means his blood came from a purple top tube.The RFLP testing burns off fifty percent of the EDTA.
@@blue-calla The two samples tested ,were not found on the day of the murders.The blood on the back gate was found 3wk's after the murders,after the property was washed down.It had degraded none.The blood on the sock,found 12wk's later.
Act sorry
Love the ignorance, the female Cochran attorney or the juror with the copious notes attempting to justify the racism of the jury. I could’ve gotten OJ off.
I wonder how long D. Fung remained a Criminalist 3… ?
in the series, Lang said that Fung got his ass handed to him by the defense while he was on the stand. If he remained, he watched every single thing he did after that case. LOL
Q4 coming and going
After watching the OJ25 on youtube l can say the LADP evidence came from objects they had access to. My understanding is that there were CC camera all over the place including the airport and the hotel lobby in Chicago to determine when did finger cut occurred
LAPD planted evidence. Namely the back gate blood, Bundy drops and bloody sock. This was proven 100 percent. Main reason for verdict. Also OJ cut hand in Chicago...they interviewed the front desk clerk who said OJ asked for bandage. Also found blood in room.
Roger Codsack
I know I keep saying this but the judge should of been fired immediately how do we give judges so much power and there allowed to act like children
Returned rock...no ofcr without car
“We’re not here for drama”
“I’m so mad at you guys I’m about to find you in contempt”
Judge ito - empty threats and complaining about the behavior HE ALLOWED. Ito is PURE drama.
18:00 van put 2 officers on it at 530 in the morning, unifom officers,.
19:00 Ididn't want to draw attention to the bonco.
Tow truck driver, status?
24:status, who the man was.
29:00 everything out of the rodinary is evidence.
Mark opened the most presents on the witness stand,
If the LAPD wasn't so incompetent in all phases OJ woulda gone to jail
If they weren’t so racists Fuhrman wouldn’t have been able to plant evidence. Damn White Supremacist in uniform.
He would have been sentenced to death.
@@bighomiemac3472 please show me any proof that fuhrman planted any evidence? I’ll wait patiently......
@@garethwilby4033 Please show me evidence that that Blue Koated Klansman Fuhrman didn't or wouldn't plant evidence. I'll wait.
@@bighomiemac3472 it’s hardly the same thing is it,anyone can accuse anyone of anything,but you’ve outright stated as fact that fuhrman planted evidence,so show me proof,better yet the “dream team” also accused him outright,show me just ONE speck of evidence that they presented that showed he did,and before you scream “he plead the 5th” that doesn’t count as they accused him way before that happened,bet you don’t reply With any evidence because none was presented,all they did was make claims that he did because no proof exists,as him planting the glove was impossible!
37:27 This guy is shady AF. All of his answers are inconclusive and simply subjective opinions. Gets agitated when examined. Wonder why he was labelled as an 'expert'.
Several things strike me as I watch this.
1. I'm sure OJ did it.
2. The cops/prosecutors was so used to no one having the resources to question their half-assed way of doing things that they were stunned when someone finally did.
3. I don't think the cops planted anything but the manner they went about conducting the investigation and the manner the evidence was collected was such shoddy work it allowed it all to be questioned.
4. The prosecutors made several major mistakes. They used Fuhrman, they did the stupid glove testing, they acted like they had a slam dunk case and in 99.99% of the time they probably would've had against a normal defendant but now they were up against someone with more resources then they did and who questioned everything they had done. They lost this case on arrogance an hubris!
You're blaming everyone except Simpson, after you think he did it
8 will cheap shop
AWFUL JUDGE
No
Holy Massive Grey Wig on the Bench. Make it a bit more obvious why don’t you.
What do u expect from a tow truck driver.