Review of Canon 100-400mm II | Still worth buying in 2021?!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 มิ.ย. 2024
- This is my long term #review of the #Canon #100-400mm F/4.5-5.6L IS II after almost 4 years of regular use. I talk about all the #pros & #cons I've discovered and show you some of my #best #sample #images taken with this lens.
The question remains: in the current world of mirrorless cameras, is it worth #upgrading to the new #RF 100-500mm lens or stick with this one for considerably less #money? Will it produce similar #results in terms of #image #quality or fall considerably behind the new revamped #version for mirrorless systems?
Source for the charts used in this video:
www.the-digital-picture.com/R...
MUSIC CREDIT: music by Karl Casey @ White Bat Audio
----THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING---
/ @peterviragphoto
Table of contents:
0:00 Intro
1:09 Features & basic specs
2:46 Image stabilisation
3:33 Use of extenders
4:13 Mounting
4:32 MFD & Magnification Ratio
5:26 Summary
6:37 More Sample shots
Instagram: / peterviragphoto
Facebook: / peterviragphoto
Twitter: / peterviragphoto
---------------------------------------
Check out the lens here:
www.amazon.com.au/Canon-100-4... - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![[TH] VCT Pacific Stage 2 - Week 2 Day 1 // RRQ vs TLN | DRX vs PRX](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_OWt_-Lu3AE/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for watching everyone! Please SUBSCRIBE if you found the review useful! Cheers😉
Great review Peter 👌 one of those all time great lenses you always hang on to. Beautiful sample images mate 👍🙏
Thanks a lot Adrian. I have wanted to review this lens for ages. Your video last weekend must have inspired me to finish it!😀 I need to test it with the DCR-250 snap on lens, and see how much better it would be than the standard zoom lens I tested the other week on an APS-c body for macros. Have a great weekend & looking forward to watching your next upload later!😉👌👌📸
Hi Peter ! Great review. What an amazing lens , with fantastic image quality .
Thanks a lot mate, very kind of you. I agree re the image quality, really happy with it. Although if someone threw a 600 f/4 at me I wouldn’t say no🤣🤣🤣
Excellent review and very well explained, thank you.
Thanks a lot for your kind feedback. Have a good one!😊
Great review on this lens. I was fortunate enough to get this one a few years back as a gift from a friend who wasn't using it and what a lens it is. So happy. I use it in a lot of wildlife and pet photography. Love using it so much that I even tried it on some portrait outdoor photography and because of the quality of the glass in this lens, I loved it even in portraits outdoors. What an incredible lens it is. I have a older version, so I used the converter ring with my mirrorless and don't lose any quality or focus timing. Thank you Peter. Another amazing confirmation on a great product and happy to have seen this review, learned a bit more of technical things about my lens thanks to you.
Thanks a lot Jake for watching, much appreciated! Glad to hear you love this lens too. It is great optically and super versatile so not surprised you’ve tried it for potraiture as well!:) Have an amazing week!
@@peterviragphoto Thank you Peter, you do the same. Have a wonderful week.
great review.. amazing pictures
Thanks heaps Anita, very much appreciated! Hope you’re having a lovely week! Cheers:)
Thanks Peter for the review
Best channel!!!!
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻🤝🤝🤝
You’ve been one of my greatest supporters, so thank you!☺️😀
@@peterviragphoto my pleasure Peter 🤝
Peter, that was a great review. You put so much production into your videos. Seriously you should have way more subscribers than what you currently have. I see people with 50k followers and their pics/vids are not up to scratch. Good luck going forward.
Heh thanks Alex, need to always improve!😀😉
This is such a well done review. I'm watching it like I'm in the market for a Canon lens but I shoot nikon. Very well done 👏
Hey buddy. Haha thanks a lot, really appreciate it!😀😀
I bought this lens 2 years ago use on a crop Canon 80D and a full frame Canon 6dmk2 it is amazing for outdoor photography. You nailed it in this review hitting all the key points.
Hey Jeremiah, thanks heaps for your feedback. Glad you like this lens, it’s definitely one of my favourites as well! If you have instagram , I’d be happy to follow you there. Stay safe & keep shooting!😉🐦🐧📸
@@peterviragphoto I created an instagram account a while ago but havent been using it, here are some of my fav pics i took with that lens, for anyone to take a look for that matter. The IS seems to handle well in all situations it never has failed me for quality. Ill get on that instagram account soon. drive.google.com/drive/folders/19T3jRSSdFx-fW1H7NM8zNjlF7w9MUnUa?usp=sharing
@peterviragphoto I got my instragram account up and going today after many friends asking . Come check it out. Jer_young1
@@jeremiahyoung5931 hey buddy, done:) thanks for sharing!😉☺️
@@peterviragphoto thank you. Love the Macrophotography you've posted.
beautiful imagesss !
Thank you very much Arun, very kind of you! Have a great day & hope to see you around! Cheers
I have the mk1 and i want this new one. Weather sealing is the most important for me. Rest is bonus!
Hey buddy. I think you’d love it! Thanks for watching, appreciate the feedback! Cheers
well said
Hey Zac thanks a a lot for your feedback, much appreciated. Hope to see you around! All the best!👍
Love your work. Do you hold lessons? I'm in Melb. TIA. I have a 5D4, and want to get more from it
Hi Eddie. Thanks for your kind words, much appreciated. I don’t normally hold lessons but I’d be happy to help you if I can. What specifically were you thinking of? Feel free to contact me via my website which will forward the message to my email. You can find the link in the description of the channel. Cheers.
I think there is a misunderstanding of cropfactor and extender. Cropfactor means the pic is crop 1.4x from the fullframe, extender means it extend the focal length of a lens. So apsc camera doesnt mean it extend the focal length of a lens. It simply crop the pic 1.4x from the fullframe.
Correct me if i was wrong. Thank u.
Hi Riki, thanks for your feedback. The crop factor in Canon’s APS-C lineup is 1.6x, in Nikon cameras it’s 1.5x. You’re correct as in the actual physical focal length doesn’t change obviously but due to the change in field of view e.g. a 400mm telephoto lens gives you the equivalent of a 640mm lens on a full frame when using a body such as the 80D of mine. The extenders do physically “alter” the focal length by adding a lens element but with considerable degradation in image quality and AF performance, especially with the 2x extender as briefly mentioned. Hope this helps. Thanks again for watching & I hope you’re well!😉👍
good video.
so the answer to the question : "Still worth buying in 2021?!" is a BIG yes.
Thanks a lot! Yes, definitely ( in 2022 too😀) . Cheers
Sold!Thank you
Hey Viktor, haha thanks bud! I think you’re going to like this lens a lot. What body will you be using it with if I may ask? Thanks again for your feedback and hope to see you around on the channel!👍😉
@@peterviragphoto I’m going to use it with 90d,super excited to get those close shots of birds!is my first tele zoom lens tho;)Quality content mate
@@Isume90 hey Viktor, that’s awesome! I first started using it with my 80D, the 90D is a great upgrade of that lineup from what I’ve seen, it’s an awesome camera for sure ( great for macro as well! Love the crop factor😀) . Btw. feel free to sub, appreciate the support😝. Have a great evening! If you have instagram, I’d be happy to follow your work there. Cheers.👍
Hi Peter, someone said the lens' tele-end is shorter than 400mm by significant percentage, do you have comment on the same? I'm considering a purchase between the lens and RF100-500.
Hi Lawrence. I haven’t noticed such & on the R7 it provides you with the equivalent of 640mm on full frame. I’m loving it on the R7, performs really well w/o any issues. Good luck with whichever lens you end up buying. Here in Australia the RF 100-500 is so much more expensive so I’d still go with the EF version. Thanks for watching. Cheers
Hi Peter, interesting review. I use this lens on a Canon 7D MkII and cannot get it to work with a 1.4 extender at all. Absolutely nothing even close to being in focus. Anything obvious that I might be doing wrong?
Hey Nick, thx for your feedback. That’s frustrating! Is it the third version if I may ask? Cheers
@@peterviragphoto Hmm, I don't know. Just had a look at the lens and there doesn't seem to be anything obvious to let me know which version.
www.digidirect.com.au/canon-extender-ef-1-4x-iii?gclid=EAIaIQobChMImO6zgb2h8wIVm4NLBR3AXgCbEAUYBCABEgJjKPD_BwE
You can see on the side the version #. Maybe the first iteration had issues with Zoom lenses and only works on primes
@@peterviragphoto Aha, you meant the extender itself. Ok, I haven't heard of this so will check it out. It was an extender that I borrowed so will go back and ask my friend which version it was and see where this takes me. Thanks for that, it at least gives me some sort of clue that nobody had s
uggested before - I have met others who have had exactly the same problem with the same set up.
No worries mate. Sorry that it didn’t work with your setup but have a look here: shuttermuse.com/canon-cameras-autofocus-extenders-f8-aperture/
Have a great day Nick!
My friend going to 200-800 soon, so this will be mine for 1300€, with benefit that I know everything about history of that lens from day one. Its output isn't as magic as from 70-300mm L which I had years ago, lens with prime-like rendering, though another 100mm on the long end is a huge advantage.
Hey Gino. I think you’ll have plenty of fun with it! The 70-300 mm has the same variable aperture as this one so you’ll like it I’m sure. Thanks for dropping by. All the best! Cheers
I am wondering how this would go paired with my R5 for outdoor sports photography...
I think it would be perfect:)
It canon refurbished lens directly from canon. I’ll play around with it some more on my 90D. Thanks for your help . 😎
No worries mate, you’re very welcome. Maybe it just needs some micro adjustment. Good luck with the testing! Hope to see you around👍😉
@@peterviragphoto the canon software update solved the lens problem.
@@Scottye-yn8zc hey Scotty, That’s great news, very happy for you👍😉 btw. feel free to sub if you haven’t yet. Thanks for the support!😀
Não gostei da 90D + Sigma Contemporary, na questão de foco, você acha que a 90D + essa 400mm is ii usm daria um fico melhor?
90D + 400 IS II= 👍👍
I liked your fast-paced video, but one missing thing is showing the reach of 400mm and then adding extenders 1.4 or 2 if you had it with you.
Thanks Vimal. Don’t have either of those extenders, otherwise I would have included them, hence he short reference. Cheers
@@peterviragphoto Yes, understandably. No further complaining 🙂
@@vimalneha all good:) Have a great day!
I didn't like the 90D + Sigma Contemporary, in terms of focus, do you think the 90D + this 400mm is ii usm would be better? And in terms of camera, which one do you recommend with this 90D or RP lens? If you can answer, thank you, lol...
Hi Rui. I’m sure the 400 IS II would perform great with both. Cheers
@@peterviragphoto , but would the focus of the 90D improve with the 400mm compared to the sigma Contemporary?
AF accuracy is usually better with native lenses
@@peterviragphoto, 👍🇧🇷 !
Would it be ok on a crop sensor canon camera like the 90d?
Hey SR, great to hear from you. It certainly would, I still use it from time to time on my 80D & the 90D has better AF and a great upgrade, so I csn highly recommend. Thanks for watching & hope to see you around!
@@peterviragphoto thank you for your speedy reply
@@SR-sg7qk you are very welcome! Hope it has helped😊
Is that okay also for sports photography?
Yes, definitely!
Many TH-cam comments on this lens' 3 IS Modes are not entirely correct and have been very confusing because the commentator has no Canon Manual or has not read it. Canon Manual states: Mode 1 is for Stationary Subjects (eg Portrait or Landscape) and corrects hand motion in both horizontal and vertical. Mode 2 is for Moving Subjects and corrects hand motion in both horizontal and vertical and is activated by half pressing the shutter release before you take your picture. Mode 3 is the same as Mode 2 except that IS is activated after AF is set and before the shutter is released when you take the picture. This allows a more precise image capture and also conserves on battery power. Canon Manuals are available online.
Yep, correct Roland! Thanks for your feedback!
Excelente video.
Una consulta, quiero comprarme la canon ef 100 400 ii usada por 1500 dólares o la 100 500 rf por 2200 dólares. Vale la pena pagar esa diferencia? La usaré con la canon r6. Gracias
Hola, gracias por mirar y suscribirte. Estoy usando el traductor de Google. La calidad de imagen para ambos lentes es bastante similar, la versión RF puede ser un poco más nítida. Por la distancia focal adicional, pierde un punto de luz. Si tienes el presupuesto, puede que valga la pena comprar el nuevo objetivo, pero el antiguo también es increíble y no te decepcionará. Espero que esto ayude.
Muchas gracias por el video y también por la respuesta, mañana seré el nuevo dueño de una 100 400 ii 👍😊
@@marcosadrianurbieta Awesome!😀
@@peterviragphoto hey man just curious would this work for the canon eos rebel t7
Does it make noise inside after shooting?
Noise? Besides the optical IBS/AF sound there shouldn’t be anything else making noise. Cheers
Got my
Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM Lens. I noticed at full 400 the focus flutters (in and out of focus)at times. Anyone else seen this? If I focus slightly less than 400 (399)it’s fine. I also didn’t realize how noisy this lens is. Is there something wrong with my lens?
Hey Scotty that is unusual. Focus breathing can happen on occasions but I’ve never had any real issues, it’s 99% of the time very fast and accurate at all focal lengths. It’s interesting that yours is having issues at 400mm, The lens can be noisy though especially when image stabilisation is active. If you are concerned, maybe taking it back to an authorised Canon service centre might be a good idea. Hope you’ll be able to have it sorted! Good luck!
May I ask what Canon camera you are using?
Also AI-SERVO could do this on my old Canon, I used Single shot or multi-shot and avoided AI-SERVO. Newer and higher-end Canon probably should be fine with AI-SERVO
@@jamiefenner9443 hey Jamie, I use the 80D & the 1DX Mark II ( the latter for most of my wildlife shots except macro stills ). Not sure what Scotty’s camera body is. AI servo works perfectly fine on either of these and of course in the new mirrorless cameras too. What “old” body were you referring to if I may ask? Cheers.
Canon 90D, lens software update fixed issue
@@jamiefenner9443 canon 90D. Lens software update fixed issue
is it compatible with 5d mark 4?
Hi Talha. Thanks for your question. It certainly is! The 5D 4 has an EF mount so it workd perfectly with this lens. Hope to see you around. Please subscribe if you enjoy nature photography:) ny the way what would you buy this lens for? Wildlife? Cheers.
This lens is better or Canon 800 lens؟؟
Hi there. I assume you’re referring to the RF 800 f/11? I’d say this one is definitely better in terms of optical performance and AF unless you need the 800mm reach. Cheers
I´d love one of these lenses, but it's way out of my price range. If anybody's got a spare one they don't want, I´ll give it a good home 🙂
Thanks for your comment Peter. Yes, unfortunately EF lenses are still somewhat pricey and the RF versions are even more expensive:( There are a few more accessible 3rd party lenses out there that still produce great results. Cheers
@@peterviragphoto Yes indeed, Peter. I've been eyeing up the Tamron 150 -600 mm. I already own a Tamron lens - the 90 mm macro - and I have to say it's an excellent product.
That’s great to hear Peter. Hope you’ll be happy with whatever you chose. All the best & thanks again for dropping by. Cheers
What an intro
Heh hope it was ok🤣
400mm simply isn't enough for birds... Returned mine.
Good lens though.
Thanks for your comment. If you can’t get close enough and the bird species is tiny then yes it can be a struggle at times but it certainly is enough for bird photography. You can always opt to use an extender or use it on an APS-c body to circumvent the relatively low focal length. It might be better for you to go for something like the Sigma 150-600 or the Tamron equivalent. Good luck whichever you chose. Stay safe and enjoy photography! All the best!:)
The 100-500 only supports a 2X TC to 300mm then stops it so max. benefit is only to 600mm.
Hi there. The 100-400 works at 800mm, e.g. on a body like the 80D, even though you lose AF points through the viewfinder, the dual pixel cmos still works in live view and the focal length will be doubled. Note: this is the 3rd iteration of the teleconverter & in most cases primes with f/4 beyond the 500mm focal length work better .
@@peterviragphoto My question was concerning the RF 100-500mm $3000.00 usd lens , not the 100-400. Another channel said attaching a 2x extender on it limited its range specifically stops it at 300mm. I probably gotta email Canon N. America for exact limitation. Thanks.
@Dan The Man sorry misunderstood/misread your comment . That’s pretty meh ( esp. With that pricetag ), thx for clearing that up. Hopefully Canon will provide you with an explanation. Good luck!
I feel the still worth buying on 2021 or 22 or 23 now are entirely irreverent. if this lens is an L lens from 1995 and has ultrasonic motor it is still worth buying.
You’re totally right Renee! Release dates aren’t as relevant as one would normally expect especially with L series lenses but some people aren’t aware of that. I still agree ( might change the title haha ). Have a great weekend!
100-500 is so much better for rf.
You mean a native lens is better for a specific mount? What’s the surprise there? Also define “much better”. It’s not much better, has its own strengths and weaknesses. One primary negative is light loss at the equivalent 400mm focal length, besides being significantly more expensive. This video was not a comparison either.