Economics of the Price Leadership (Dominant Firm) Model

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 22

  • @xxprincessaxx2
    @xxprincessaxx2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    You saved ma life for my economics exam. GOD BLESS YOU AND YOUR WORK

  • @AngeHikari
    @AngeHikari 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wasted 3 hours staring at my reading materials only to discover that this video explained the same thing in 8 mins. This channel's a lifesaver. Subbed

  • @nicknack5211
    @nicknack5211 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for a great explanation to a topic, where there wasn't a good explanatory video in German!
    Just one remark. Assuming 100 firms produce 7,325 output it's roughly 70 per firm, not 700.

    • @EconomicsinManyLessons
      @EconomicsinManyLessons  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for watching. Yes, I misspoke at the end of the video about the 700 firms--the output should be approximately 70 units per firm.

  • @justaturtlepassingthrough3972
    @justaturtlepassingthrough3972 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    My TA actually recommended us to watch this video before tomorrow's exam if we still had doubts, and this is very well explained, so thank you a lot!

  • @richyblitz
    @richyblitz 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your an inspiration, i appreciate your videos and your attention to detail!

  • @NKSamson
    @NKSamson ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello, first of all, thank you for these amazing videos. So helpful!
    I've however ran into a problem which is bothering me and i hope you can help.
    After getting the demand function for the Dominant firm QD = 40,000 - 125P , to get its TR function, i multiplied the QD function by P, since TR = Q*P. So the TR function of the Dominant firm became TR = 40,000P - 125P^2.
    When i plug into the values we got for P and QD i.e P = 265 and QD =6,875 into TR = 40,000P - 125P^2, I get the same answers as plugging them into your TR function of TR= 320QD -0.008QD^2.
    Now here comes the problem; getting the MR for each of those two TR functions by differentiation (one with respect to P and the other QD) gives different answers.
    At first i thought getting MR by differentiating TR with respect to P was wrong, but then i saw you use it in another video i.e Oligopoly Bertrand competition with differentiated goods.
    So, my question is: Why are the MR functions giving different values yet the TR functions are giving the same values?
    Thank you so much! I hope you respond...

  • @dinatauli
    @dinatauli 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very helpful! thank you!

  • @travelforjesusis4j143
    @travelforjesusis4j143 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for your videos. very helpful. Grateful if you could help me on these:
    1. In your price leadership/dominant market example, how will i get the minimum price in the price leadership oligopoly?
    2. How will i get the profit of both dominant firm and competitive fringe?
    Thank you.

  • @zehradilarakaradeniz7953
    @zehradilarakaradeniz7953 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are the greatest! Thanks

  • @exoticculture9363
    @exoticculture9363 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thumbs up dude

  • @McCordMusic7
    @McCordMusic7 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    best explanations dude :D

  • @lolalola-lj7tf
    @lolalola-lj7tf ปีที่แล้ว

    Please explain how can I find the "Small Firms Lerner Index".

  • @SuryanshGupta-x2t
    @SuryanshGupta-x2t 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    W channel

  • @worldfacts6519
    @worldfacts6519 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How you get the price equation???

  • @youwhatsuptube
    @youwhatsuptube 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    most questions TC is not given... only MC is given. does it matter?

  • @hariniamarasinghe9238
    @hariniamarasinghe9238 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot

  • @harrishassan2659
    @harrishassan2659 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank u

  • @vinayak136
    @vinayak136 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks guru :)

  • @GobyFC
    @GobyFC 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dont you mean on your first slide market demand for small firms. Or are you assuming that demand equals supply?

  • @AshishYadav-lw8ru
    @AshishYadav-lw8ru 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    its dominat and model not daaaaminant and maaaadel