Third-Degree Price Discrimination or Segmenting

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ย. 2024
  • This video shows how to solve a basic price discrimination problem when the firm uses segmenting.
    If this video helps, please consider a donation: www.paypal.com...

ความคิดเห็น • 50

  • @tayyabaraza264
    @tayyabaraza264 5 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    25 is Q not 80.....when I was solving I recognized this mistake..Tc is 30Q

  • @michellemiddleton5173
    @michellemiddleton5173 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for the helpful video - none of my economics material explained it this well!

  • @fifihei
    @fifihei 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Loved this video! I got an exam in 2-3 hours. Hope that it will be save my life! Keep up with the great efforts!

  • @de5339
    @de5339 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you, for some extra help here :) some professors cant explain the most basic economic equations beacuse they only read results that they took from somewhere else anyway.

  • @damhippos
    @damhippos 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you so much! You are a million times better than my economics teacher. You are a goddamn hero.

  • @barovierkevinallybose1040
    @barovierkevinallybose1040 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you mislead me for my exam (but can't say I haven't learnt from you during the semester) but you are suppose to evaluate the appropriate price level before determining what quantity demand function to use. You went directly to just using the aggregate demand function.

  • @nicolasvoisard6139
    @nicolasvoisard6139 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you you saved my exams i love u

  • @yowanyowan5168
    @yowanyowan5168 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks sir I learnt lot from you 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼

  • @vuyontshangase8624
    @vuyontshangase8624 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You're the best!!!

  • @walidmohamed9237
    @walidmohamed9237 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    beautiful explanation. keep on the good work!

  • @MediaWorkify
    @MediaWorkify 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is awesome sir,
    thank you very much for uploading this!!!

  • @gunsandroses4
    @gunsandroses4 10 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    4:45 isn't Q = 25 and not 80?

    • @EconomicsinManyLessons
      @EconomicsinManyLessons  10 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Thanks for finding the error. The correction is noted in the video.

    • @Hercules003
      @Hercules003 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It was a typo, he still got the right result though of $1250-otherwise it would have been -400!

  • @teenskeey2157
    @teenskeey2157 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow man...God bless you

  • @dheliyaisuranga5205
    @dheliyaisuranga5205 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir,Please can explain me how to get the market supply equation of below question
    There are 100 identical firms in the market.
    P=200-2Q
    TC=32+20q+8q^2
    MC=20+16q

    • @EconomicsinManyLessons
      @EconomicsinManyLessons  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This video will help: th-cam.com/video/bvfhn_djYrI/w-d-xo.html

  • @aminurkhan5376
    @aminurkhan5376 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video sir. Thank you so much

  • @RAVIKUMAR-ky2rc
    @RAVIKUMAR-ky2rc 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super sir👍👌

  • @iDokka__BAE
    @iDokka__BAE 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks mate so much appreciated that was rly helpful. keep on going bro.

  • @daniellake9955
    @daniellake9955 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great Video

  • @henriettaifyede1737
    @henriettaifyede1737 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In the example without price discrimination, isn't p = 130- Q and MR = 130-2Q? where Q is 50 and not 25? How did you get p = 130-2Q?

  • @sophiamalik1729
    @sophiamalik1729 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    You're amazing! Thank you!!!!

  • @Mohareal
    @Mohareal 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Where did the 2Q come from?

  • @bulkacademy9267
    @bulkacademy9267 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    very helpful thanx

  • @Claudia-pp6on
    @Claudia-pp6on 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    very helpful

  • @aparnaagarwal4364
    @aparnaagarwal4364 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you so so much...

  • @liuzeyu1044
    @liuzeyu1044 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi, I understand that P=130-2Q but why you can get MR=130-4Q?

    • @EconomicsinManyLessons
      @EconomicsinManyLessons  7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      zeyu liu total revenue = PxQ = (130-Q)Q = 130Q - 2Q^2. After taking the derivative of total revenue, we get MR = 130 - 4Q.

    • @liuzeyu1044
      @liuzeyu1044 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you so much sir

  • @serinacat4781
    @serinacat4781 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    hope you can post a second price discrimination

  • @awsalmanmohamed8428
    @awsalmanmohamed8428 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    i think the inverse demand function is p=13-0.2Q.

  • @Mandy-sx7li
    @Mandy-sx7li 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you :)

  • @muhammadalim8038
    @muhammadalim8038 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    App NY explain achay tarap Kia hy... Magar Mera samj main nahe a rah hae app assan tareeka main explain krly app ka mehrbhani ho gy

  • @funnyvideobymonster2795
    @funnyvideobymonster2795 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it possible to do the problem without knowing the value of MC or MR?

  • @ardasev
    @ardasev 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is wrong you cant add up demand curves like that you need to make horizontal sum. if price were to be 10 first customers will buy 20 and second customers would buy 0 not -5 so demand is 20 for 10 . If you plug 10 in summed up equation demand becomes 15 . very wrong.............

  • @yutongkang578
    @yutongkang578 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    why MR is double of P?

    • @EconomicsinManyLessons
      @EconomicsinManyLessons  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's just a fact that MR will have a slope that is twice as steep as its linear demand curve. Here's the proof: p = a - bq. TR = pq = (a - bq)q and simplifying TR= aq - bq^2. To get MR take the derivative of TR or dTR/dq = MR = a - 2bq.

  • @emerenciananchimbi428
    @emerenciananchimbi428 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    i did,nt get it how 5p=65_q turned into p=130-2q

    • @EconomicsinManyLessons
      @EconomicsinManyLessons  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Emerenciana Nchimbi There is a decimal point in front of the 5; it should read 0.5p = 65 - q. After dividing both sides by 0.50, you get p = 130 - 2q.

    • @emerenciananchimbi428
      @emerenciananchimbi428 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      +1sportingclays sorry sir.0.5 how😞?

    • @EconomicsinManyLessons
      @EconomicsinManyLessons  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Emerenciana Nchimbi Q1 = 40 - 0.2P1 and Q2 = 25 - 0.3P2. Q1 + Q2 = Q = 65 - 0.5P.

    • @emerenciananchimbi428
      @emerenciananchimbi428 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      +1sportingclays okay.....thank you

    • @ericmokua3311
      @ericmokua3311 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EconomicsinManyLessons clearly it shows that's 5 and not 0.5

  • @abdelrahmankamel8417
    @abdelrahmankamel8417 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    incorrect results please revised your numbers

  • @MLSfootballz
    @MLSfootballz 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    boss

  • @MediaWorkify
    @MediaWorkify 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    You made an error. 83.33 - 3.33*8 is 56.69, not 56.67.
    Therefore profit etc is incorrect