@@FishYellow3You can’t, but that’s not the reason why. Non-integers would work as you just have to multiply until the ratio is with whole numbers: for example, a polyrhythm with 0.5:3 is the same as a polyrhythm with 1:6 but at half the speed. The problem with irrational numbers is they, by definition, cannot be expressed by a fraction of two integers and therefore cannot be multiplied to become an integer. You could get close, but it’s physically impossible to have a polyrhythm with pi or sqrt(3) as part of it (or even just on their own, as at a certain point the time it takes the computer to compute its next action will be longer than the margin of error for the number)
*Listen.* I am not here for a normal polyrhythm. The thing is? Everyone here just wanted to see their comment slapped on a video for exposure. No. I am here for a different reason. The sheer effort and energy based in polyrhythms has drove me to the point of writing this essay-long comment. if you're sped, This is not a normal suggestion. This is a serious mark of fear into the lengths he goes. This is not an appreciation, this is a threat. My leave? 1, 2, 3, 8, *FIRST SKEWE'S NUMBER.* Fear me.
A circle has no points so it isn’t possible. Or maybe it is created with infinite points. It is either going to make no noise or infinite noise and will drown out any other rhythms.
I think the shape of 2.5 should be like two pentagons, but one upside down. And it takes two loops to go to the really top. Im spanish, I hope I wrote it OK
A forma geométrica de um lado deveria ser um círculo, não um ponto, pois um ponto não tem nem uma única vértice, e o círculo tem uma única vértica que conecta as pontas da circunferência, que são conectadas por uma única vérice. E o círculo não tem dois lados, porque o de dentro não é contabilizado. O ponto deveria ter rítimo infinito, pois ele tem perímetro zero, e não dá para se mover em seu perímetro logo sempre estaria encostando na ponta e criando rítimo infinto
new riddim album sounds fire
if you can do irrational numbers, do π:√3
Can't happen because you can't have 0.14159265...th of a point, it has to be a whole number
@@FishYellow3it would have to do it that many times per second which is possible just more effort
@@FishYellow3 aww
@@FishYellow3You can’t, but that’s not the reason why. Non-integers would work as you just have to multiply until the ratio is with whole numbers: for example, a polyrhythm with 0.5:3 is the same as a polyrhythm with 1:6 but at half the speed. The problem with irrational numbers is they, by definition, cannot be expressed by a fraction of two integers and therefore cannot be multiplied to become an integer. You could get close, but it’s physically impossible to have a polyrhythm with pi or sqrt(3) as part of it (or even just on their own, as at a certain point the time it takes the computer to compute its next action will be longer than the margin of error for the number)
Shape won’t be normal but it’s possible
Do 7:11:255:2048
7:15:31:63 is more swag
my guy 💀
Bro finna summon a circle
2^11 =D
@@WatermelonQeed That looks like an IP address
This is literally the most cursed comment section i have ever seen
i genuinely have no clue what's going on or what any of this means
same
Agreed.
the wonders of autism are insane
yup...
5:7 but 7 is 400ms too late
1:2:3:4:5:6:7:8:9:10:11:12:13:14:15:16:17:18:19:20:21:22:23:24:25:26:27:28:29:30
💀
Rip ears
to much
Yeah, but imagine it, what would the chaos be like
@ it would be like- *AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA*
0:57 “BEFORE YOU POINT YOUR FINGER YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT IM THE MAN!!!”🗣️🔥🔥🔥
for anyone looking for the biggest number, its at 13:45
Thank you!😁
I didn’t know there were 2 circles!
no way its the 7th sth victor sometime in 2025
me playing on the bongos while construction work is outside:
@@thisisanotherplaceholder sth 2025
2:15 was fire ngl
If the 6 was 3 it would be very fire
23:35 Paprika
*Listen.*
I am not here for a normal polyrhythm. The thing is? Everyone here just wanted to see their comment slapped on a video for exposure. No. I am here for a different reason. The sheer effort and energy based in polyrhythms has drove me to the point of writing this essay-long comment. if you're sped, This is not a normal suggestion. This is a serious mark of fear into the lengths he goes. This is not an appreciation, this is a threat. My leave?
1, 2, 3, 8, *FIRST SKEWE'S NUMBER.* Fear me.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Okay hear me out
2 : 3 : 5 : circle
1:7:55:9^^9:RAYO'S NUMBER
you know any number 10000 times the original polyrhythm will result in a pitch rather than a beat since drums are in fact notes.
@@sonicwaveinfinitymiddwelle8555literally extratone
can you try more than 4? like, the first 13 digits of the fibbonaci sequence?
2:4:6:8 would be the most normal one
same as 3:4
1:2:4:8 be like
@@JazzyKetchup235thats just not a polyrhythm
@@d500dev exactly
That would just be 1:2:3:4.
!..!..!..!..
!...!...!...
!.....!.....
!...........
15:48 I like the first 2, very catchy beat
The numbers referenced in the video’s title.
cool idea: make 1 a circle
1:3:8:infinity polyrhythm would go so hard
1:2:Googol:Google plex
A circle has no points so it isn’t possible. Or maybe it is created with infinite points. It is either going to make no noise or infinite noise and will drown out any other rhythms.
Then make it a teardrop@@FredericChopin-if5rn
THE ANIMATIONS ARE PHASE OFFSET JESSE! THEY'RE SLIGHTLY OFF SO THE OUTER ONES FINISH EACH LOOP LATER
I wanna see if fractions are allowed:
2.5:3.5
like 5:7 but 2x slower
I'm curious what the shapes will look like
chat is this fire?
@@Just_A_Random_Idiot_3.14I believeth so.
I think the shape of 2.5 should be like two pentagons, but one upside down. And it takes two loops to go to the really top. Im spanish, I hope I wrote it OK
I believe the shapes are gonna bq stellated polygons (more precicely a pentagram and a 2-heptagtam)
@@aaronj5882 you did 👍
Now do 3!:4!:5!:6!
Ghe exclamations are factorials
6:24:120:720 is what your saying
@tenplusten1116 yes
6:24:120:720
It's just gonna sound like 720 with accentuations since they can all divide 720
2:14 is just prog-african drumming
Can it be played with a backbeat? For example, 1:4b:5b:6b:7b
Do the Fibonacci Sequence.
that first one was fire asf
Can you do 2:2:2:2?
2:25
A forma geométrica de um lado deveria ser um círculo, não um ponto, pois um ponto não tem nem uma única vértice, e o círculo tem uma única vértica que conecta as pontas da circunferência, que são conectadas por uma única vérice. E o círculo não tem dois lados, porque o de dentro não é contabilizado. O ponto deveria ter rítimo infinito, pois ele tem perímetro zero, e não dá para se mover em seu perímetro logo sempre estaria encostando na ponta e criando rítimo infinto
What do you use to make these polyrythms?
Polyrhythm:
36, 40, 60, 90
Can you do 2,3,5,6,8 at 180 bpm
3. that's it that's the polyrhythm just 3
Pls do Ω:∞:3 Tree:10000000 and finnaly -10
real
not the tree function
The tree function can't output without an input silly
ok
4:4:6:7?
Make one of the squares have a 45° angle
pls do 2,4,10,12
2:37 bro that’s just a circle wtf
Do 10, 8, 6, 4, 2
Do 1 2 and i
Do 6,12,18,24
Do 282 ,38,4 ,48,1 ,7
Polyrhythm:
60, 90, 108, 120
2,7,6,3
Dare: play "MURDER EVREY 1 U KNOW" from femtanyl in polyrhythm
Good idea but idk if that’s possible
@floppa-films.coolguy th-cam.com/video/9XtPIhMTxdI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=iXzcKegG9Vkzmj2G it is possible in piano
@floppa-films.coolguy th-cam.com/video/9XtPIhMTxdI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=ISpPMQ4riRwXwYAB well...
I swear the 24:4:2:1 is actually 21:4:2:1?
the first 4 prime numbers after 3 plzz (5:7:11:13)
So 5:7:11:
So 5:7:11:13?
@@ens_kai yes
Polyrhythm:
3, 4, 8, 93
Do 1:10:3:8:67
a:b:c:d:e and e is a drum slightly to bong 76%
1:3:6:9:12 would probably sound good.
1:50 ping pong 2.0
Do 500:450:69:7802
ooh, can you do 8 : 12 : 18 : 27
I wonder how 32: 16:8:4 would look
Polyrhythm:
13, 28, 63, 123
also that 38 sounded like a railgun XD
I wonder what ∞ would sound like
@@yamensalman7849 A sound so high-pitched you wouldn't be able to hear it
Sprunki if it was geometry:
no
1:35 that's not 24 tho, that's 21
Do 1:9:2:6 it’ll sound good 👍
hmmm, you should try:
2.5:3:7,5:11:4096
WHY ARE THERE SO MANY POWERS OF TWO
can you do 50:51
The first 7 primes
Try 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, go as far as you want
so far only 4 numbers. later I will adapt the video for 5 numbers
@polyrhythmrelax oh ok nvm
What the color be with 5 colors
Per parte 48 fai 4, 5, 10, 15
Can you do 1:5:58:173
1:2:6:24:120:720
I think it will be cool because it is the first 6 factorials
so far only 4 numbers. later I will adapt the video for 5 numbers
Ok you can do the first 4 but I really wanna see the whole thing
Also ((3!)!!)÷3-3!=10
Thought I would give some math
101,235:136:7 would go crazy
24:00:00 Why does this take long
IS THAT GNARPY
@@le_meme_stealer OMG YOURE RIGHT IT IS GNARPY HOLY
Pls 11:22:33:44:55:66:77:88:99:110🎉❤
online sequencer drums?
100,50,25,12,6,3,1
do 3:3
Highest point ever
3:7:11:13:17
72:7 🤑🤑🤑
(Timestamp) 14:03 Asriel Dremurr 💀💀💀
19, 32, 14, 84
1,2,8,16,32,64,128
Do 1:3:4:12 that’ll be interesting I think
9, 0, 90, 99
what about 1:2:4:8
1 googol:TREE(2):5/129:RAYO’S NUMBER
Can you do
5:10:15:100
Do 1:2:3:5:8
2:3:5:7:11:13:17
Day 623 of asking to do 2:246:2468:24686
Wow
I do wonder what 2:3:4:8:16:64 sounds like.
22:40 pentegon
4,7,37,60
Try 17:38. Or 5:7.
1:♾️
Your ears will explode when you hear that 😭
boom WAAAAAWJIODJAWIOJDAOIWJOAWJDIAWDJIJFIOAJOIFJWIOJFIJIOJF boom DHWUWAHFUIEHFIOEWFUJIEKWDFJIDEWJFVOJWFV boom
@@BoxytabletIt won't have any sound cause the pitch will be so fast
1:34 trap
12,34,56,78
How about 6:4:120:40
17,3,2,4
1, 4, 6, 12
1, 10, 100, 1000
1 to 10 please
shh3973 and Hien-s7t have sold me fent in highschool
3, 14 ,15, 9, 26, 5
0:01 NONAGON
NONAGON IS AGITATEd
18,7,26,9
125, 1, 2, 5
3:4:8:6:12
76,13,4,7