Welcome to Sanatan Dharma (Hinduism) sir. Sanatan Dharma believes entire universe is born from same source Whom we Hindus call AUM(OM). Hence we believe that Parmatma (God) is in every thing because all have born from same source and that same source is present within all as vital life force, hence all are equal that's why our Sanatan Dharma scriptures says "Vasudhaiv Kutumbakam" means not just 3-4 but whole world is our family. Love for all hatred for none. We believe within every living being there is divine God that's why we do namaste to all means I bow down to the divine in you. That's why you will find majority of Sanatan Dharmi Hindus vegetarian also as we see Parmatma (God) even within animals. Our Sanatan Dharma (Hinduism) is oldest civilization on planet Earth created by Parmatma. It all about spirituality and human salvation from cycle of birth and death. Welcome to Sanatan family. 😊
And finally they concluded that unknown thing as Sat Chith Ananad (always existed conciousness bliss). That is the final truth. That is the Athma(original form/ essense) of everything. Every living being is searching for ever lasting happiness (bliss). But where to search ? How to search ? With mind using five senses in five elements ? NO. That bliss is the source of the mind/thought. Take reverse gear. Know your self.
Wonderful hymn from Rigveda, shows philosophical richness of such an ancient time. Wonderful depiction of unknown related to creation and putting even Gods after creation of universe and accepting unknown.
@@nitinbull8720 Hymn's marvel is in the admission of ignorance & unknown therefore paving way for exploring the knowledge. Hymn doesn't give any "know it all" theological explanation of world around, it rather focuses on the vastness & beauty of unknown. It promotes questioning and that too thousands of years ago.
The profoundness of the Mother of all religions, the religion of humanity of grace and compassion of tolerance....one has to be born as sanatana dharmi, can never be converted... One can pray to be graced to be born a sanatanadharmi if one seeks liberation.
@@tafri961 he said "we don't know". That's the best explanation. Instead of others saying this happened and that happened - because then you can always ask how do you know? But this is the best - the poet of this hymn accepts that it is a mystery which will never be solved. He says "we do not know and even the gods do not know". Best description of the world's greatest mystery.
Vedic Rishi's were already contemplating about things like this and it makes me wonder the height the thought process and society had reached. I also feel sad where we have descended to from then. Where did we go wrong?
Divergent theories, freedom of natural innate spontaneous expression resulted in different schools and the blind followers ultimately we have lost that lofty inquisitive fresh Vision of our Rishis and Munis-- this is internal cause for our downfall!😂😞😠😭
The devtas like Indra Agni vayu and other demigods came after the creation of universe because Brahma created them after the creation of the universe that's why it says the Devas came after creation
Nasadiya sukta is best explained by Carl Sagan in his episode of Cosmos A personal voyage where he correlates this with Big bang, big rip and the continuous process of Brahma's day and night. Watch it. Very different view of Nasadiya Sukta by a Top NASA scientist of all times.
He might have tried to explain and understand it...but for sure it can't be best the origin has its own explanation until n unless we find it these superficial explanation are nothing but a piece of paper
Listening to this, reading the meaning of the verses reinforces that ancient Indian scholars attributed the creation not to any God or diety, rather formless one, which nobody can define. I find it very liberating, in a sense that one doesn't need to define a God, who really knows. It is beautiful and scientific view on creationism, and I think one is free to interpret its meaning. Listening to it is like an acceptance of one being nothing and still a part of everything. I can't really describe it. And I can't help but marvel at the astounding heights of intelligence and eloquence of the composer of this sukta. I am speechless, to say the least.
What are you even saying? The Ancients do attribute creation to Brahma, and Narayana (Vishnu). This clearly shows that later Hindus had different views tha. Earlier people Also Most religions also don't define God. They just do an attempt to define, but leave most of the explanation such as what's the real nature, or what's reality. From what I've studied, Absolute Metaphysics of Quran and Hinduism is more similar, as compared to Christianity.
@@asresalim6145bhrama and bhraman are different, if you read puranas word by word, you'll see they drop nuggets of wisdom including about different philosophies like sankya, Vedant, nyaay etc and bhraman(all pervading super consious) in between Stories. These stories makes deep sophisticated concepts accessible to common people , how these stories are to be read is also mentioned, which has three ways of reading it Adhi devik, adhi bhootik, adhi dehik.... One reads them as per his own wisdom.
Brahma and Narayana and Vishnu are just adjectives, not to be personified. It's said the world came from paramtatva narayana. Narayana is said to be in sleeping state in cosmos. Brahma comes from narayana and creates the universe. Brahma is big bang. Narayana is the param tatva, the element, the singularity which expanded into the cosmos. It is said that Brahma had four heads, from which he expanded. Brahma is personification of expansion of universe. @@asresalim6145
Oh, how I remember watching this program on Sunday doordarshan, and getting goosebumps even at such a young age of 9-12. Something about the scripts drew my attention to it…didn’t understand a thing, but now it makes sense.
You know that our ancestors talked about the yugas and how in kaliyuga people will mock vedas. Most people’s beliefs will become superficial. People will be less spiritual and more materialistic. For all that to happen, India’s downfall is a must. And that exactly what happened. Maybe it’s all a game of the intelligent creator. Maybe there is some truth to the yuga cycle, where slow deterioration of the human intelligence and consciousness level is important. If not the massive numbers (4.3 million years per yuga cycle), atleast some thousands of years of deterioration of human intelligence and then rise after some time is possible. It’s all a game you see. It makes sense to us when you see the world as a video game. Designed to be a certain way.
I played it 5 times but still I think i understood only 10% of meaning. I referred to other sites but cannot understand more than 10% I wonder none in this world can understand GOD more than 10%. Wonderful presentation by Doordarshan. Discourses about this in IIT Kanpur also give same 10%(but not in such a small duration of time). But I feel making such a deep presentation and make it understand upto 10% in one video is very good effort by Doordarshan. Full marks to Doordarshan. Great Efforts...... Infact it contains full 100% meaning of god. I am really speachless
I am referring to god who created all creatures and holding his creation and protecting and destroying accordingly... He is present everywhere and with us always in our hearts.. He is supernatural
It was the beginning of philosophical enquiry, later in the time of Upanishads, it was concluded that Krishna tu bhagwan swayam or Govindam adi purushan tvam aham bhajami. Bhagavad Gita and Brahma samhita or sutra.
So scientific... So logical... N understood n spread to the world by saints of sanatan We bow before you ... Our great ancestors We ... Whole humanity is indebted to you all
Ancient Greeks calculated Tilt of Earth, what would you say about it? You say acceptance of all thoughts, then go on to say "Most Scientific" while disrespecting all other religions and their own revolutions
@@asresalim6145 no one is disrespecting other religion, best path to realize truth is vaidic path { not saying that you can't achieve truth from other path/religion }, indeed greeks were good at science but indians also contributed many things to science you can't deny that, in fact contributions of ancient indians is not less than greek.
@@asresalim6145 yes but neither ancient Greeks nor this or anything scientific in the world has come out of your pieceful mazhab which is only a blot on humanity. Focus on what your mazhabi have contributed to planet rather than taking Refuge in ancient Greeks. your mazhab contribution is only boom💥. Also today most Greeks themselves are adopting Sanatan Dharma after finding it most peaceful and most scientific.
@@_Bappu_plus god sanctioned sex slave, paedophilia, slave trading, woman as adhi akal, farm of man, man with four wives and as many slaves as he wants. And it's just the tip of it, that's without mentioning the deep hatred for kaffirs and superiority complex for self.
@@kartiksangwan3302 Unfortunately, Indology is a subject that is threatened with extinction in Germany, there used to be more students. we are only 3 students in my semester
Nasadiya sukta align perfectly with what we call the Big Bang theory . Describing nothing but a singularity before all the duality such as devta & rakhshas, mrityu & jivan , satya & asatya and many more such things . Creators of Rig Ved knew much more and well before the time history has been recorded
The beauty of Sanskrit is scientifically proven. Listening to Sanskrit sholkas can help a lot in early fetal development in womb and even after being born impacts the brain development.
How do you know ? Does it have a scientific backup and proof ? Is there any experiment performed ? Is it just your intuition? Or you just believe without investigating the results ? Did you ask question that it happens just because of this mantra or anything other ? How do you know ?
Hamari Sanatan Parampara ko Shat-Shat Naman....Yeh hamara durbhaagya hi hai ..jo hum apni Sanaskriti aur Parampara ko bhul baithe hain, jo ki ek Aadhyatmik Shaanti Pradaan karta hai.
Dont you think we have reduced ourselves to sanskar and parampara only, and dont actually think as intellectually and freely as our Vedic forefathers? In last 5000 years, what have we added to the Vedic vault of wisdom? It's not like they told us that their word is last and final like middle eastern religions.
@@rairadio7119 May be reread whole book? Yajur Veda 13.12, ”O king, make progress in thy duty of administration, extend happiness to the virtuous. O terrible chastiser, burn down the irreligious foes. O splendid person, humiliate and consume utterly like dried up stubble, him, who encourages our foe.” Atharva Veda 12.5.62 Rend, rend to bits, rend through and through, scorch and consume and burn to dust, the one who rejects the Vedas Atharva Veda 12.2.23 He who dwells fixed in the atmosphere, smiting the blasphemers of the god that do not sacrifice to him be reverence with ten Sakvari-stanzas. Atharva Veda 10.3.3 He who dwells fixed in the atmosphere, smiting the blasphemers of the god that do not sacrifice to him be reverence with ten Sakvari-stanzas. Atharva Veda 20.93.1 May our hymns give you great delight. Display your bounty, Thudered. Drive off [kill] the enemies of the Vedas. Rig Veda 6.72.1 ye killed all darkness and the Gods’ blasphemers. Srimad Bhagvatam 4.4.17 Sati continued: If one hears an irresponsible person blaspheme the master and controller of religion, one should block his ears and go away if unable to punish him. But if one is able to kill, then one should by force cut out the blasphemer’s tongue and kill the offender, and after that one should give up his own life. Yaska Acharya also writes about terror, Nirukta 10.21 …These are hemistichs. Like a spear hurled, it inspires terror (among enemies) or courage (among friends)… “You can still see that the description of Raakshasas given therein tallies with the ugly appearance of the negroes of today.” Satyarth Prakash, by Dayanand Saraswati, Ch 8, page 266, Tr. Chrinajiva Bhardwaja Swami Prabhupada writes: “…An atheist is called a demon, and it is a fact that even a person born of good parents can turn into a demon by bad association…” Swami Prabhupada on Srimad Bhagavatam 3.3.6
@R-st2um , you are mlecchas , pedofile desert cult follower , this stuff too much philosophical for you to handle , please go and trust that sky book 🤡😚
🚩Jai Virat Visvakarma *Na Bhoomir Na Jalam Chaiva Na Teejo Nacha Vaayavaha Na chakasam na chitthasha Na budhi khrana gocharam Nacha Brahmaa Na Vishnuscha Na Rudrascha Taarakaaha Sarvashoonya niralambam Swayambhu Viswakarmana*
No human rendered voice feels as powerful as this...the CHANTS..WOW,UNIVERSE CAN REVERBERATE,so ROUSING AS IF MY BRAIN WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO HOLD N IT'LL EXPLODE UP....🙏
"Krishna Daipayan Vedvyas " Ji.....HE is one of The Incarnations of LORD VISHNU 🙏....we should always be grateful and thankful to These Priceless Shastras of The ancient Bharatvarsh....."The Four Vedas"...The four pillars of our culture and knowledge..."Om Namo Bhagvatey Vasudevaya"🙏🙏🙏
These musings about the origins of creation show the curiosity of early humans. If they were around today, they would have been happy to know the progress mankind has made in that endeavor. Do we share that curiosity, with our ancestors? Is the yearning to know still inherent in us even today?
English Translation: 1. Then even non-existence was not there, nor existence, There was no air then, nor the space beyond it. What covered it? Where was it? In whose keeping? Was there then cosmic fluid, in depths unfathomed? 2. Then there was neither death nor immortality nor was there then the torch of night and day. The One breathed windlessly and self-sustaining. There was that One then, and there was no other. 3. At first there was only darkness wrapped in darkness. All this was only unillumined cosmic water. That One which came to be, enclosed in nothing, arose at last, born of the power of knowledge. 4. In the beginning desire descended on it - that was the primal seed, born of the mind. The sages who have searched their hearts with wisdom know that which is, is kin to that which is not. 5. And they have stretched their cord across the void, and know what was above, and what below. Seminal powers made fertile mighty forces. Below was strength, and over it was impulse. 6. But, after all, who knows, and who can say Whence it all came, and how creation happened? the gods themselves are later than creation, so who knows truly whence it has arisen? 7. Whence all creation had its origin, the creator, whether he fashioned it or whether he did not, the creator, who surveys it all from highest heaven, he knows - or maybe even he does not know. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nasadiya_Sukta
this song should be remade with each line spoken in a major national language ... or how about whole poem (The Nāsadīya Sūkta also known as the Hymn of Creation ... the 129th hymn of the 10th mandala of the Rigveda) in each of major languages of world?
They are not asking questions as most people are assuming. It's a pun, they are simultaneously giving the answer. It's the ' Kah ' ' Who' a Vedic concept of divinity who is the answer. They call is ' Who ' because it can't be defined.
Hiee I am also searching for the Sanskrit track if you are able to find please do let me know and vice versa. We might have to reach to doordarshan for this. Mr vanraj Bhatia one of the composers passed away this may. may his soul rest in peace.
For those who are unaware, prajāpati parameṣṭhī is the ṛṣi who composed this beautiful and mystical sūkta. nāsadīya sūkta is the 129th sūkta of the 10th maṇḍala of our most ancient scripture, ṛgveda. It contains 7 hymns.
@@pratikwankhede6218 vedas are older than that .......vedas are first written scripture in human history ...... So don't believe in the dates which are given by Christians .......
नासदासीन नो सदासीत तदानीं नासीद रजो नो वयोमापरो यत । किमावरीवः कुह कस्य शर्मन्नम्भः किमासीद गहनं गम्भीरम॥ सृष्टी से पहले सत् नहीं था असत् भी नहीं अन्तरिक्ष भी नहीं आकाश भी नहीं था छिपा था क्या? कहाँ? किसने ढका था? उस पल तो अगम अतल जल भी कहाँ था? ।।१।। नहीं थी मृत्यू थी अमरता भी नहीं नहीं था दिन रात भी नहीं हवा भी नहीं साँस थी स्वयमेव फिर भी नही था कोई कुछ भी परमतत्त्व से अलग या परे भी ।।२।। अंधेरे में अंधेरा-मुँदा अँधेरा था जल भी केवल निराकार जल था परमतत्त्व था सृजन-कामना से भरा ओछे जल से घिरा वही अपनी तपस्या की महिमा से उभरा ।।३।। (The stanza number 3 above is not heard in all the versions but is there in the original rendering.) परम मन में बीज पहला जो उगा काम बनकर वह जगा कवियों ग्यानियों ने जाना असत् और सत् का निकट संबंध पहचाना ।।४।। फैले संबंध के किरण धागे तिरछे परमतत्त्व उस पल ऊपर या नीचे? वह था बँटा हुआ पुरुष और स्त्री बना हुआ ऊपर दाता वही भोक्ता नीचे वसुधा स्वधा हो गया ।।५।। सृष्टी यह बनी कैसे? किससे? आई है कहाँ से? कोई क्या जानता है? बता सकता है? देवताओं को नहीं ग्यात वे आए सृजन के बाद सृष्टी को रचां है जिसने उसको जाना किसने? ।।६।। सृष्टी का कौन है कर्ता? कर्ता है वा अकर्ता? ऊँचे आकाश में रहता सदा अध्यक्ष बना रहता वही सचमुच में जानता या नहीं भी जानता है किसी को नहीं पता नहीं पता नहीं है पता ।।७।।
It's in the cosmos from eternity ,the first three vedas are from satya yuga. Everything about universe is in the cosmos, one deeply willing to know can only know it.
i replied to another comment but i guess i should put one here directly. in the actual suktam...kah is addressed. now kah is translated as who but it is actually the name of the ultimate concept of god in rigveda. the one who is beyond,he's addressed as such. next in the last line the poet expresses his amazement at the world by using literary devices to make it seem like the universe is so marvellous that perhaps even the creator doesn't know where it came from. this is just for exaggeration as the poet himself explained creation previously. think how we exaggerate things in daily life. now compare that with the last line. the poet never has any doubt that the god he prays to might or might not know where this world came from or how it came to be.
Doesn't it reveal the essence of the theory of 'Creation from Absolute Void'.. the most modern theory of Cosmology.. 'The Big-Bang' ? I won't be surprised if people like Max Tegmark, in any of his future publication admits his indebtedness to this 'Hymn' as Robert Oppenheimer did to the 11th Chapter of Bhagawad Gita after he saw the 1st Atomic Explosion at Los Alamos !!!
Indeed each aspect of quantum exploration leads to this and these profound realisations - even the discoveries (not inventions) in LHC and Higgs fields converges to something written 8-10000 years back and still modern particle theories including string theory seems to give it a miss on aspects of consciousness - deliberate or otherwise is not known - former seems to be the pointer - as admittance of individual consciousness has a mention (by none other than Einstein himself) but seems admittance could lead to lots of foundational aspects (including tenets of quantum computing) to collapse and there is lot riding commercially on our shaky understanding in this areas - the problem of measurement still remains unanswered for over 100 years & Copenhagen interpretation is still best but most debated answer - Feynman said nobody understands quantum theory & we don't want to acknowledge Rigveda & Vedanta
Yes this sukta clearly mentioned "paramtatva" =big bang,but this sukta is not complete in later hymns they talked about unarranged thread means vibration ....rest is still mystery I am sure after things boson particle they will find vibration which we called "dhananjay rashmi"
Hiranyagarbha is the seed of the whole creation including the seven planes of consciousness and seven heavens . This seed is also known as ' Purush '. This Purush in conjunction with ' Prakruti ' gives birth to the whole creation , visible and invisible . Invisible creation includes seven planes of consciousness and seven heavens.
"He only knows or perhaps he knows not....."
How wonderfully they described the unimaginable vastness of existence and it's nature.
Whoever composed this hymn was one of the greatest philosopher to ever live.
Its Jamadagni who composed it.
Author of Nasadiya Sukt is Maharishi Prajapati Parmeshthi. Please check author on 129th sukta in 10th chapter of Rig Veda, you will get actual author
Welcome to Sanatan Dharma (Hinduism) sir. Sanatan Dharma believes entire universe is born from same source Whom we Hindus call AUM(OM). Hence we believe that Parmatma (God) is in every thing because all have born from same source and that same source is present within all as vital life force, hence all are equal that's why our Sanatan Dharma scriptures says "Vasudhaiv Kutumbakam" means not just 3-4 but whole world is our family. Love for all hatred for none. We believe within every living being there is divine God that's why we do namaste to all means I bow down to the divine in you. That's why you will find majority of Sanatan Dharmi Hindus vegetarian also as we see Parmatma (God) even within animals. Our Sanatan Dharma (Hinduism) is oldest civilization on planet Earth created by Parmatma. It all about spirituality and human salvation from cycle of birth and death. Welcome to Sanatan family. 😊
And finally they concluded that unknown thing as Sat Chith Ananad (always existed conciousness bliss). That is the final truth. That is the Athma(original form/ essense) of everything.
Every living being is searching for ever lasting happiness (bliss). But where to search ? How to search ? With mind using five senses in five elements ? NO.
That bliss is the source of the mind/thought. Take reverse gear. Know your self.
There is no author of vedas@@pankajkelkar198
आचार्य प्रशांत जी ने बताया था इस सूक्त के बारे में। लव यू आचार्य जी।
Wonderful hymn from Rigveda, shows philosophical richness of such an ancient time. Wonderful depiction of unknown related to creation and putting even Gods after creation of universe and accepting unknown.
But shukla ji they mentioned paramtatva,what was that paramtatva our scientist working on
@@nitinbull8720 Hymn's marvel is in the admission of ignorance & unknown therefore paving way for exploring the knowledge. Hymn doesn't give any "know it all" theological explanation of world around, it rather focuses on the vastness & beauty of unknown. It promotes questioning and that too thousands of years ago.
@@abhi4086 shukla ji hindi ko english m samjhoge to Matlab galat hi niklenga....
गजब दुनिया मे ऐसी कोई भासा नही जो संस्कृत के सामने टिक पाए ।
@@RDPOINTOFVIEW whi m kehra tha bhai angrezi gulam bne huwe h.. McCauley khush hora hoga wo kamyab hogya
Legendary was the sage who composed it, defines the very joy of existence, make me feel ecstatic to be alive. Om namo shivaya.
Maharshi Jamdagni.
No it doesnt mean that we should try for materialism because of this verse
जय सनातन धर्म।जय ऋषि मुनि। जय वेद। 🎉🎉😊
This sukta can only be revealed after deep saghan Dhyan or deep knowing.
What a beautiful!what a fantastic question!
The profoundness of the Mother of all religions, the religion of humanity of grace and compassion of tolerance....one has to be born as sanatana dharmi, can never be converted... One can pray to be graced to be born a sanatanadharmi if one seeks liberation.
Enjoyed this Sukta since 1989 and still Enjoy.
How True and Meaningful.
The person who composed this sukta was a genius.
Vyasa was a genius
He was genius of genius. The one. OM
@@Nova67827 vysa is only compiler not creater
True... and The Honest as well... he didn't impose rather suggest ... that's honestly 💯 👌
@@tafri961 he said "we don't know". That's the best explanation. Instead of others saying this happened and that happened - because then you can always ask how do you know? But this is the best - the poet of this hymn accepts that it is a mystery which will never be solved. He says "we do not know and even the gods do not know". Best description of the world's greatest mystery.
The suktas and the Vedas are formatted by superb minds and thoughts of the Rishis 🙏🏼🪔🙏🏼
I've watched this video countless times the last two years. Very powerful stuff
I have also watched so many times still everytime it feels fresh and powerful. There is huge attraction in these lines and music also.
Vedic Rishi's were already contemplating about things like this and it makes me wonder the height the thought process and society had reached.
I also feel sad where we have descended to from then. Where did we go wrong?
Islamic invasion & British education.
Divergent theories, freedom of natural innate spontaneous expression resulted in different schools and the blind followers ultimately we have lost that lofty inquisitive fresh Vision of our Rishis and Munis-- this is internal cause for our downfall!😂😞😠😭
When we stopped worshiping the vedic gods
@@bhumanandamaharaj8177 exactly
@@pratikagrawal8742 easy blame .....reflect
Bharat ek Khoj and Cosmos (1980) are my two best tv series.
Bharat ek khoj is full of incorrect events. Deprogram and reprogram your self. Dont trust nehru version.
@@sarak220 how do you know about inaccuracies?
@@devdhiman77 history has be corrected with evidence. Listen to new historians.
@@sarak220 😂😂neharu g ne history nhi likhi hai balki historians ke thoughts reffer kiye Hain Amit sah aur Modi nya itihas likh rhe hain unko pdh tu
Bharat ek Khoj was propoganda by nehru a British agent...
This called truth.
The gods came after universe ❤❤❤
Its deva that come after universe because veda talks about formless higher power so yaah all the devas we know came after universe
@@udittrivedi7181 when there was nothing Narayana alone existed.
@@gravity.inescapable narayana can be said but it Ishwar is mostly referred as Brahman,formless and almighty God who takes forms
@@kopshow660 Nārāyaṇa is Parabrahm. He is formless at the same time have a form which transcends the beauty of everything.
The devtas like Indra Agni vayu and other demigods came after the creation of universe because Brahma created them after the creation of the universe that's why it says the Devas came after creation
Nasadiya sukta is best explained by Carl Sagan in his episode of Cosmos A personal voyage where he correlates this with Big bang, big rip and the continuous process of Brahma's day and night. Watch it. Very different view of Nasadiya Sukta by a Top NASA scientist of all times.
He might have tried to explain and understand it...but for sure it can't be best the origin has its own explanation until n unless we find it these superficial explanation are nothing but a piece of paper
@@sanskrutikulkarni9636 आप कौन है यह बताओ मुझे
Shall share your knowledge.
No doubt by accident
Listening to this, reading the meaning of the verses reinforces that ancient Indian scholars attributed the creation not to any God or diety, rather formless one, which nobody can define. I find it very liberating, in a sense that one doesn't need to define a God, who really knows. It is beautiful and scientific view on creationism, and I think one is free to interpret its meaning. Listening to it is like an acceptance of one being nothing and still a part of everything. I can't really describe it. And I can't help but marvel at the astounding heights of intelligence and eloquence of the composer of this sukta. I am speechless, to say the least.
What are you even saying? The Ancients do attribute creation to Brahma, and Narayana (Vishnu). This clearly shows that later Hindus had different views tha. Earlier people
Also Most religions also don't define God. They just do an attempt to define, but leave most of the explanation such as what's the real nature, or what's reality.
From what I've studied, Absolute Metaphysics of Quran and Hinduism is more similar, as compared to Christianity.
This is exactly what Islam calls the Essence of God
@@TheoSophiiohh hell nah
@@asresalim6145bhrama and bhraman are different, if you read puranas word by word, you'll see they drop nuggets of wisdom including about different philosophies like sankya, Vedant, nyaay etc and bhraman(all pervading super consious) in between Stories.
These stories makes deep sophisticated concepts accessible to common people , how these stories are to be read is also mentioned, which has three ways of reading it
Adhi devik, adhi bhootik, adhi dehik.... One reads them as per his own wisdom.
Brahma and Narayana and Vishnu are just adjectives, not to be personified.
It's said the world came from paramtatva narayana.
Narayana is said to be in sleeping state in cosmos.
Brahma comes from narayana and creates the universe.
Brahma is big bang.
Narayana is the param tatva, the element, the singularity which expanded into the cosmos.
It is said that Brahma had four heads, from which he expanded. Brahma is personification of expansion of universe.
@@asresalim6145
Oh, how I remember watching this program on Sunday doordarshan, and getting goosebumps even at such a young age of 9-12. Something about the scripts drew my attention to it…didn’t understand a thing, but now it makes sense.
Came back to this because of #THEVACCINEWAR Thanks Vivek for reigniting the interest!
दुनिया का सबसे रहस्यमयी लिरिक्स और सॉन्ग! 🔥🔥❤️
The creation is mentioned superbly instead of pretending to know these sages said who knows when and who created it. 🙏
How we indians underestimate ourselves now , and other countries feel proud of themselves
Exactly only reason I can find is we stopped seeking
You know that our ancestors talked about the yugas and how in kaliyuga people will mock vedas. Most people’s beliefs will become superficial. People will be less spiritual and more materialistic. For all that to happen, India’s downfall is a must. And that exactly what happened. Maybe it’s all a game of the intelligent creator. Maybe there is some truth to the yuga cycle, where slow deterioration of the human intelligence and consciousness level is important. If not the massive numbers (4.3 million years per yuga cycle), atleast some thousands of years of deterioration of human intelligence and then rise after some time is possible.
It’s all a game you see. It makes sense to us when you see the world as a video game. Designed to be a certain way.
आज से करोड़ों साल पहले लोगो के ज्ञान को प्रणाम❤
I played it 5 times but still I think i understood only 10% of meaning. I referred to other sites but cannot understand more than 10% I wonder none in this world can understand GOD more than 10%. Wonderful presentation by Doordarshan. Discourses about this in IIT Kanpur also give same 10%(but not in such a small duration of time). But I feel making such a deep presentation and make it understand upto 10% in one video is very good effort by Doordarshan. Full marks to Doordarshan. Great Efforts...... Infact it contains full 100% meaning of god. I am really speachless
I am referring to god who created all creatures and holding his creation and protecting and destroying accordingly... He is present everywhere and with us always in our hearts..
He is supernatural
He has no name and I figure him as thinking power(for 100 crores of misfortunes there are infinite crores of ways to escape)
Most translations are in English which leaves out a lot of details and sometimes the inherent essence is lost. Hindi is still closer.
To understand what it is saying Read complete works of Swami vivekanand.... Volume 2......Its everything about Non-duality
It was the beginning of philosophical enquiry, later in the time of Upanishads, it was concluded that Krishna tu bhagwan swayam or Govindam adi purushan tvam aham bhajami. Bhagavad Gita and Brahma samhita or sutra.
This is the purest definition of Agnosticism.
So scientific... So logical... N understood n spread to the world by saints of sanatan
We bow before you ... Our great ancestors
We ... Whole humanity is indebted to you all
I become more confuse and more curious whenever i listen this mantras. Thanks vedas for giving me this kind of curiosity.
Most scientific Dharma... Acceptence of all thoughts..❤️
Ancient Greeks calculated Tilt of Earth, what would you say about it?
You say acceptance of all thoughts, then go on to say "Most Scientific" while disrespecting all other religions and their own revolutions
@@asresalim6145 no one is disrespecting other religion, best path to realize truth is vaidic path { not saying that you can't achieve truth from other path/religion }, indeed greeks were good at science but indians also contributed many things to science you can't deny that, in fact contributions of ancient indians is not less than greek.
@@asresalim6145 yes but neither ancient Greeks nor this or anything scientific in the world has come out of your pieceful mazhab which is only a blot on humanity. Focus on what your mazhabi have contributed to planet rather than taking Refuge in ancient Greeks. your mazhab contribution is only boom💥. Also today most Greeks themselves are adopting Sanatan Dharma after finding it most peaceful and most scientific.
@@asresalim6145 look who's saying this.. what your religion had contributed to world? An unnecessary terr0rism?
@@_Bappu_plus god sanctioned sex slave, paedophilia, slave trading, woman as adhi akal, farm of man, man with four wives and as many slaves as he wants. And it's just the tip of it, that's without mentioning the deep hatred for kaffirs and superiority complex for self.
Bharat ek Khoj.... What a masterpiece!!! Love every episode
Prods scientific thinking, shows intellectual honesty ...
No wonder the foundations of formal language theory are embedded in Sanskrit.
संपूर्ण विश्व कसे निर्माण झाले हे आपल्या वेदात स्पष्ट केलेले आहे, पण आपल्याला माहीत नाही, दुदैव आपले...
काहीही! सृष्टीच्या निर्मितीबाबत जिज्ञासा नासदीय सूक्त आणि हिरण्यगर्भ सूक्त यांतून दिसून येते मात्र त्या रहस्याची उकल पुराणे आणि उपनिषदे यांत आहे.
Greetings from Germany 🇩🇪👍 I need to learn this
May I know what led you here? Why are Germans so interested in Vedas? I see many Germans under the videos of Vedas.
@@kartiksangwan3302 I study Indology thats why :-)
@@SintiSchneck just curious haha
@@kartiksangwan3302 Unfortunately, Indology is a subject that is threatened with extinction in Germany, there used to be more students. we are only 3 students in my semester
Indology is huge. Everybody fails to understand the Vedic Sanskrit. People only know classical Sanskrit.
इस नासदीय सूक्त मै पूरा विश्व धर्म का ज्ञान विज्ञान समाया हुआ है
Nasadiya sukta align perfectly with what we call the Big Bang theory . Describing nothing but a singularity before all the duality such as devta & rakhshas, mrityu & jivan , satya & asatya and many more such things . Creators of Rig Ved knew much more and well before the time history has been recorded
This was written before 1500 BCE ❤
. See what mankind in India was doing at that time.. And now where we are and our dharma lies..
What 1500 BC? Vedas are way way older than this proposed timeline.It was given by christians to drag Vedic era closer to Jesus.
Vedas were made in Sat yug and it's millions of years old.
It is atleast 8000 years old.
Atleast 3100 year old.
Today no dharma only drama...
The beauty of Sanskrit is scientifically proven. Listening to Sanskrit sholkas can help a lot in early fetal development in womb and even after being born impacts the brain development.
How do you know ? Does it have a scientific backup and proof ? Is there any experiment performed ? Is it just your intuition? Or you just believe without investigating the results ? Did you ask question that it happens just because of this mantra or anything other ? How do you know ?
How do you know that you are even real?@@SanatanSurya12
@@SanatanSurya12 you were really a demanding PITA 😄 LOL You just bombarded that guy with a deluge of questions. Take it easy ..... 🙏🏽
Simple words mein itni deep baatein... Awesome
Our ancestors remembered all 4 Vedas by listening. They were in an another level 😊❤
Jai jagannath 🙏🚩 jai shree krishna 🙏🚩
Chup lindu
Is this what we call Pissful community?@@drdre5030
@@drdre5030mu//e chuth jal gayi
Kis baat ki jalan h ?@@drdre5030
@@drdre5030abe katuwe jaake 7ve asman m g marwaa
Just imagine this single verse is much older than Islam & Christianity...🙏
This is best intro ever made🙏🌹भारतीय तर्कशास्त्र का मूल
महान विचार
गूढ़ चिंतन ...
जो सवाल आज हमारा आधुनिक विज्ञान कर रहा है वो सवाल हमारे पूर्वज करोड़ साल पहले कर चुके है
Hamari Sanatan Parampara ko Shat-Shat Naman....Yeh hamara durbhaagya hi hai ..jo hum apni Sanaskriti aur Parampara ko bhul baithe hain, jo ki ek Aadhyatmik Shaanti Pradaan karta hai.
Dont you think we have reduced ourselves to sanskar and parampara only, and dont actually think as intellectually and freely as our Vedic forefathers? In last 5000 years, what have we added to the Vedic vault of wisdom? It's not like they told us that their word is last and final like middle eastern religions.
@@rairadio7119 May be reread whole book? Yajur Veda 13.12,
”O king, make progress in thy duty of administration, extend happiness to the virtuous. O terrible chastiser, burn down the irreligious foes. O splendid person, humiliate and consume utterly like dried up stubble, him, who encourages our foe.”
Atharva Veda 12.5.62
Rend, rend to bits, rend through and through, scorch and consume and burn to dust, the one who rejects the Vedas
Atharva Veda 12.2.23
He who dwells fixed in the atmosphere, smiting the blasphemers of the god that do not sacrifice to him be reverence with ten Sakvari-stanzas.
Atharva Veda 10.3.3
He who dwells fixed in the atmosphere, smiting the blasphemers of the god that do not sacrifice to him be reverence with ten Sakvari-stanzas.
Atharva Veda 20.93.1
May our hymns give you great delight. Display your bounty, Thudered. Drive off [kill] the enemies of the Vedas.
Rig Veda 6.72.1
ye killed all darkness and the Gods’ blasphemers.
Srimad Bhagvatam 4.4.17
Sati continued: If one hears an irresponsible person blaspheme the master and controller of religion, one should block his ears and go away if unable to punish him. But if one is able to kill, then one should by force cut out the blasphemer’s tongue and kill the offender, and after that one should give up his own life.
Yaska Acharya also writes about terror,
Nirukta 10.21 …These are hemistichs. Like a spear hurled, it inspires terror (among enemies) or courage (among friends)…
“You can still see that the description of Raakshasas given therein tallies with the ugly appearance of the negroes of today.” Satyarth Prakash, by Dayanand Saraswati, Ch 8, page 266, Tr. Chrinajiva Bhardwaja
Swami Prabhupada writes: “…An atheist is called a demon, and it is a fact that even a person born of good parents can turn into a demon by bad association…” Swami Prabhupada on Srimad Bhagavatam 3.3.6
Truth never changes it's location. The only thing matters is which direction you choose.
The hymn is from the Rig Ved..it was set to this tune by Shri Vanraj Bhatia and this excellent translation of the lines is by Pandit Vasant Deo 🙏 🇮🇳
thank u for that info. they must put it in the description box.
Rigveda ! Father of all Veda ! Undoubtedly!!!
@R-st2um , you are mlecchas , pedofile desert cult follower , this stuff too much philosophical for you to handle , please go and trust that sky book 🤡😚
@R-st2umis this what we call Pissful community ?
🚩Jai Virat Visvakarma
*Na Bhoomir Na Jalam Chaiva Na Teejo Nacha Vaayavaha Na
chakasam na chitthasha Na budhi khrana gocharam Nacha Brahmaa Na Vishnuscha Na Rudrascha
Taarakaaha Sarvashoonya niralambam Swayambhu Viswakarmana*
गजब दुनिया मे ऐसी कोई भासा नही जो संस्कृत के सामने टिक पाए ।
No human rendered voice feels as powerful as this...the CHANTS..WOW,UNIVERSE CAN REVERBERATE,so ROUSING AS IF MY BRAIN WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO HOLD N IT'LL EXPLODE UP....🙏
बहु उत्तमम्
धन्यवाद:,😀😍
Sanskrit always touch my soul
Beautiful hyms from Rigveda
"Krishna Daipayan Vedvyas " Ji.....HE is one of The Incarnations of LORD VISHNU 🙏....we should always be grateful and thankful to These Priceless Shastras of The ancient Bharatvarsh....."The Four Vedas"...The four pillars of our culture and knowledge..."Om Namo Bhagvatey Vasudevaya"🙏🙏🙏
This one suktam has more knowledge than whole abhramic religion.
Shyam Benegal will be chanting wherever he is in heaven. Condolences on his sad demise.
Wow. Spiritual masterpiece.
नासदासीन्नो सदासीत्तदानीं नासीद्रजो नो व्योमा परो यत् |
किमावरीवः कुह कस्य शर्मन्नम्भः किमासीद्गहनं गभीरम् ॥ १॥
न मृत्युरासीदमृतं न तर्हि न रात्र्या अह्न आसीत्प्रकेतः |
आनीदवातं स्वधया तदेकं तस्माद्धान्यन्न परः किञ्चनास ॥२॥
तम आसीत्तमसा गूहळमग्रे प्रकेतं सलिलं सर्वाऽइदम् |
तुच्छ्येनाभ्वपिहितं यदासीत्तपसस्तन्महिनाजायतैकम् ॥३॥
कामस्तदग्रे समवर्तताधि मनसो रेतः प्रथमं यदासीत् |
सतो बन्धुमसति निरविन्दन्हृदि प्रतीष्या कवयो मनीषा ॥४॥
तिरश्चीनो विततो रश्मिरेषामधः स्विदासीदुपरि स्विदासीत् |
रेतोधा आसन्महिमान आसन्त्स्वधा अवस्तात्प्रयतिः परस्तात् ॥५॥
को अद्धा वेद क इह प्र वोचत्कुत आजाता कुत इयं विसृष्टिः |
अर्वाग्देवा अस्य विसर्जनेनाथा को वेद यत आबभूव ॥६॥
इयं विसृष्टिर्यत आबभूव यदि वा दधे यदि वा न |
यो अस्याध्यक्षः परमे व्योमन्त्सो अङ्ग वेद यदि वा न वेद ॥७॥
Earliest scepticism.
Yes that is. In another words Agnotism
Hindu Sanatan Dharma is not religion . It's way of life acquired knowledge from long term experience of Nature.
What's the difference between scepticism and agnostism
@@manthanpandya7501 you mean, Agnosticism
.
@@Aspirants. 😂😂😂
दुनिया वेदों पर नहीं मरती वेदों की अमृतवाणी पर मर जाती है यही वेद पुराण की महानता है
Puran history hain aur distorted bhi. Ved hamare dharm granth hain. Aur use apourshey bhi mana jata hai. In dono ka koi comparison nhin hain.
These musings about the origins of creation show the curiosity of early humans. If they were around today, they would have been happy to know the progress mankind has made in that endeavor. Do we share that curiosity, with our ancestors? Is the yearning to know still inherent in us even today?
The eternal relevance of this sukta❤
These lines are from Rig Veda, the eternal knowledge, the DNA of material world.. Vedas are God's words
Jai Sri Krishna
Shyam benegal is a great director of india
Here after I heard it in THE VACCINE WAR trailer, enlightening ❤
English Translation:
1. Then even non-existence was not there, nor existence,
There was no air then, nor the space beyond it.
What covered it? Where was it? In whose keeping?
Was there then cosmic fluid, in depths unfathomed?
2. Then there was neither death nor immortality
nor was there then the torch of night and day.
The One breathed windlessly and self-sustaining.
There was that One then, and there was no other.
3. At first there was only darkness wrapped in darkness.
All this was only unillumined cosmic water.
That One which came to be, enclosed in nothing,
arose at last, born of the power of knowledge.
4. In the beginning desire descended on it -
that was the primal seed, born of the mind.
The sages who have searched their hearts with wisdom
know that which is, is kin to that which is not.
5. And they have stretched their cord across the void,
and know what was above, and what below.
Seminal powers made fertile mighty forces.
Below was strength, and over it was impulse.
6. But, after all, who knows, and who can say
Whence it all came, and how creation happened?
the gods themselves are later than creation,
so who knows truly whence it has arisen?
7. Whence all creation had its origin,
the creator, whether he fashioned it or whether he did not,
the creator, who surveys it all from highest heaven,
he knows - or maybe even he does not know.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nasadiya_Sukta
I wonder how a person can think with this logic 6000 years ago ?
@@Deepak_Dhakad No one think that .
Maybe few communist and islamists
most people have to ask google "how many days in april"??? lol lol lol
Humara rishi muni soch pata tha jab aadhi duniya Pato ka kapda pehenti thi
Sages did an intense deep meditation for years and years, the meditation was so intense that they started getting information
Not 6k , it's far far der than that.
this song should be remade with each line spoken in a major national language ... or how about whole poem (The Nāsadīya Sūkta also known as the Hymn of Creation ... the 129th hymn of the 10th mandala of the Rigveda) in each of major languages of world?
This is amazing👍
They are not asking questions as most people are assuming. It's a pun, they are simultaneously giving the answer. It's the ' Kah ' ' Who' a Vedic concept of divinity who is the answer.
They call is ' Who ' because it can't be defined.
नासदासीन्नो सदासीत्तदानीं नासीद्रजो नो व्योमा परो यत् |
किमावरीवः कुह कस्य शर्मन्नम्भः किमासीद्गहनं गभीरम् ॥ १॥
न मृत्युरासीदमृतं न तर्हि न रात्र्या अह्न आसीत्प्रकेतः |.......
- नासदीय सूक्त
Who has sung Sanskrit mantra in the beginning ? Anybody knows it? Please answer
The music used is also amazing!!
निर्गुण निराकार लिंग् रहित परमात्मा
Sanatana Dharma is all about seeking the truth n peace..
Hinduism: The only religion in world whose Holy book asks "who created the world before gods because gods is a later creation"
That's why Hinduism is paganism
I feel I am taking bath in holy Ganges while listening to this slokas
Yes, this is so profound
🙏🙏🙏
fiji water PUREST
*can someone taught me the concept of Nasadiya sukta ?*
Watch th-cam.com/video/iMbSd5e_sNI/w-d-xo.html
Bipasha saikia it's same as concept of Big Bang theory . The Singularity. 0=0=infinity .
@@UttarpurvBharat that's what I am trying to tell my friends that big bang theory is just as the same as described in this sukta above.
Pol Robson Hazarika
Very true and the Richa is further explained in Chandogya Upanishada
Deeply contemplative
Who wrote were genius 🙏🙏🙏
Composer has experienced it first hand.
Mantra name???
It is written in the title, "Nasadiya Sukta" .
Who has sung the first few lines in Sanskrit ? I would like to get this entire shloka in Sanskrit.
Hiee I am also searching for the Sanskrit track if you are able to find please do let me know and vice versa. We might have to reach to doordarshan for this. Mr vanraj Bhatia one of the composers passed away this may. may his soul rest in peace.
Go to rigveda mandala 10.129.1st few lines of rigveda were compsed by madhuchandas -last one was by SamvananaAngirasa Rshi
The last line "... perhaps he knows not🔥" man you say the same thing in some other part of the world & u will be dead for sure!
Sanatan Dharma 🔥🔥
For those who are unaware, prajāpati parameṣṭhī is the ṛṣi who composed this beautiful and mystical sūkta. nāsadīya sūkta is the 129th sūkta of the 10th maṇḍala of our most ancient scripture, ṛgveda. It contains 7 hymns.
Naman to our great rishis 🙏🙏
3:05 At, 1700 BC, look what Humanity was thinking
1700 BC did u knw how old are vedas
@@keshavsingh9148 Eben if not exact that time range isn't false.
@@pratikwankhede6218 i don't understand what u want to say
@@keshavsingh9148 I mean that the time range of 1700BC to 1000BC isn't wrong.
@@pratikwankhede6218 vedas are older than that .......vedas are first written scripture in human history ...... So don't believe in the dates which are given by Christians .......
Spelling mistake "Bharat Ek Khoj" ,not " Koj"
Imposition vs love , he chooses love
After btech mba llb i will do graduation in sanskrita literature
@Mohit Verma where? Can you share more details?
Phir aage kya karenge? Btayiye btayiye
@@Nishachar_2.0mandir me ghanta bajayenge or kya...
@@SHIVAMYadav-pw5uz there is something called passion
👍👍👍
नासदासीन नो सदासीत तदानीं नासीद रजो नो वयोमापरो यत ।
किमावरीवः कुह कस्य शर्मन्नम्भः किमासीद गहनं गम्भीरम॥
सृष्टी से पहले सत् नहीं था
असत् भी नहीं
अन्तरिक्ष भी नहीं
आकाश भी नहीं था
छिपा था क्या?
कहाँ?
किसने ढका था?
उस पल तो
अगम अतल जल भी कहाँ था? ।।१।।
नहीं थी मृत्यू
थी अमरता भी नहीं
नहीं था दिन
रात भी नहीं
हवा भी नहीं
साँस थी स्वयमेव फिर भी
नही था कोई कुछ भी
परमतत्त्व से अलग या परे भी ।।२।।
अंधेरे में अंधेरा-मुँदा अँधेरा था
जल भी केवल निराकार जल था
परमतत्त्व था सृजन-कामना से भरा
ओछे जल से घिरा
वही अपनी तपस्या की महिमा से उभरा ।।३।।
(The stanza number 3 above is not heard in all the versions but is there in the original rendering.)
परम मन में बीज पहला जो उगा
काम बनकर वह जगा
कवियों ग्यानियों ने जाना
असत् और सत् का निकट संबंध पहचाना ।।४।।
फैले संबंध के किरण धागे तिरछे
परमतत्त्व उस पल ऊपर या नीचे?
वह था बँटा हुआ
पुरुष और स्त्री बना हुआ
ऊपर दाता वही भोक्ता
नीचे वसुधा स्वधा
हो गया ।।५।।
सृष्टी यह बनी कैसे?
किससे?
आई है कहाँ से?
कोई क्या जानता है?
बता सकता है?
देवताओं को नहीं ग्यात
वे आए सृजन के बाद
सृष्टी को रचां है जिसने
उसको जाना किसने? ।।६।।
सृष्टी का कौन है कर्ता?
कर्ता है वा अकर्ता?
ऊँचे आकाश में रहता
सदा अध्यक्ष बना रहता
वही सचमुच में जानता
या नहीं भी जानता
है किसी को नहीं पता
नहीं पता
नहीं है पता ।।७।।
Excilent🙏
Everytime i got Goosebumps from this song
बहुत बहुत आभार
ध न्य वा द
Thanks a lot
Big bang theory poetically explained by 3000 year's ago.
How? What is the mathematical equation mentioned?
@@vinsin328 the Hymn literally ask you to prove differentiation of 0=0 = infinity .
It's in the cosmos from eternity ,the first three vedas are from satya yuga.
Everything about universe is in the cosmos, one deeply willing to know can only know it.
8000 to 10000 or even before - its way too profound and needs deep deliberations
Here big bang theory is not explained.
My quetion... hsi kisi msi himmat merra answar dene ka... i challenge... and invited.. past ptesent future.. i will question..😊
अद्वैत।
i replied to another comment but i guess i should put one here directly.
in the actual suktam...kah is addressed. now kah is translated as who but it is actually the name of the ultimate concept of god in rigveda. the one who is beyond,he's addressed as such.
next in the last line the poet expresses his amazement at the world by using literary devices to make it seem like the universe is so marvellous that perhaps even the creator doesn't know where it came from.
this is just for exaggeration as the poet himself explained creation previously.
think how we exaggerate things in daily life. now compare that with the last line.
the poet never has any doubt that the god he prays to might or might not know where this world came from or how it came to be.
Thanks to Acharya Prashant 🙌 that I'm here.
Doesn't it reveal the essence of the theory of 'Creation from Absolute Void'.. the most modern theory of Cosmology.. 'The Big-Bang' ? I won't be surprised if people like Max Tegmark, in any of his future publication admits his indebtedness to this 'Hymn' as Robert Oppenheimer did to the 11th Chapter of Bhagawad Gita after he saw the 1st Atomic Explosion at Los Alamos !!!
Indeed each aspect of quantum exploration leads to this and these profound realisations - even the discoveries (not inventions) in LHC and Higgs fields converges to something written 8-10000 years back and still modern particle theories including string theory seems to give it a miss on aspects of consciousness - deliberate or otherwise is not known - former seems to be the pointer - as admittance of individual consciousness has a mention (by none other than Einstein himself) but seems admittance could lead to lots of foundational aspects (including tenets of quantum computing) to collapse and there is lot riding commercially on our shaky understanding in this areas - the problem of measurement still remains unanswered for over 100 years & Copenhagen interpretation is still best but most debated answer - Feynman said nobody understands quantum theory & we don't want to acknowledge Rigveda & Vedanta
Yes this sukta clearly mentioned "paramtatva" =big bang,but this sukta is not complete in later hymns they talked about unarranged thread means vibration ....rest is still mystery I am sure after things boson particle they will find vibration which we called "dhananjay rashmi"
@@Robertpupo string is also mention in later hymns they said about unarranged thread
@@nitinbull8720dhananjay rashmi?
@@antiabrahamicreligion vedic rashmi theory by scientist agnivrat
Hiranyagarbha is the seed of the whole creation including the seven planes of consciousness and seven heavens . This seed is also known as ' Purush '. This Purush in
conjunction with ' Prakruti '
gives birth to the whole creation , visible and invisible . Invisible creation includes seven planes of consciousness and seven heavens.
That's sankya view, Advaita differs.
BHARAT EK KHOJ
Sir rashtrakuta vansh par vidious banaye
I loved this as a child