Robbie Gray took a mark and wasn't given a full 30 seconds to take his set shot (i think it was 15 seconds in the end) the umpire called play on and cheated port out of a win that day.
Nice video. This is the second in the series and while all the incidents highlighted are indeed dreadful decisions, the reality is you could probably make several hundred of these with equally bad umpiring blunders.
4:43 its a behind and can be proven with simple maths. the ball is seen directly over the goal post from mutliple angle, meaning if the post was taller, than the ball wouldve hit the post
In the 2009 grand final between St. Kilda and Geelong, Tom Hawkins snapped at goal and was awarded 6 points. Upon replay, the ball can be very clearly seen striking the post and changing direction yet it was called a goal. The ball-up that occurred gave Geelong a second goal giving them 11 extra points meaning that the final margin should've only been a point. Had the call been made correctly, the Cats would've led by a point, and under that sort of pressure, I'm pretty confident Geelong would've had to give and make a mistake. In my opinion, St Kilda should've won that Premiership.
In 2018, when Sydney played Hawthorn at SCG (last round of H&A), a free for deliberate out of bounds was paid against Paul Puopolo, a forward, which is rare. It was clear to everyone except the umpire that he was actually trying to keep the ball in. Didn’t affect the final result though. Btw, who was Geelong player Leigh Colbear? During his playing career his name was always pronounced as it looks, not like the mock French-style pronunciation used by a famous comedian in the USA
My Dad has physio that works for Carlton as a trainer. After the game he asked Caleb Marchbank if the ball had touched him and Marchbank responded by saying “ it touched my hand so clearly in nearly even touched my leg”. So to answer your question it was touched and the goal umpire was right.
We need to talk about all of the non high tackles against Collingwood vs GWS in the 2023 prelim that were *clearly* there, and compare them to all the high calls Nick Daicos got in the 2023 GF for dropping the knees/shoulder
It doesn't matter whether a team gains an advantage from playing on from a free kick. The reason we have the advantage rule after a free kick, is if a team deems that (in this example) a kick inside 50 is more advantageous than taking the freekick. Unfortunately, in the grand final's instance, there was plenty of time after the whistle was blown, and I guarantee that he heard the whistle as he was meters away (especially considering thousands of supporters heard it), just may not have registered to well in his head. Even if the free kick was paid, it would've had to have been a 60 metre kick from Lachie Neale, or an inside 50 against Collingwood's really strong defense. Just putting some words to some Brisbane supporters that think this one call "lost them the game"
Try watching American football. Holding, pass interference and roughing the quarterback are three things that are highly contested every game. I would say there are 30-40 questionable calls every weekend.
The 2016 Grand Final was abhorrent umpiring after half time if you are Swans fan. Worst umpiring ive ever seen was the Anzac Day game when Nathan Buckley mistakenly thought the crowd were booing Scott Pendlebury when he went up to collect the medal. That Leigh Colbert decision was a disgrace. Malceski deliberate rushed behind against the Blues in 2013 - a decision so terrible it's funny.
Mate i hate to be the one to point it out but Nathan Buckley accusing the crowd of booing Pendlebury was not umpiring. The umpire didn’t come out of nowhere and say “Crowd dissent follow me please 🤓“ The umpire actually isn’t relevant here except for the fact that Pendlebury deservedly won the ANZAC Medal. Don’t know what point you were trying to make by bringing that up.
@@musiceditz23 the crowd didn't stop booing because Collingwood won the game and the medal. The fact that Bombers fans stayed back after the game during the presentation showed how outraged they were.
@@melthoidserendipity1332 They were outraged because the team that won deserved it more? That’s pathetic sure the umpire was shit but that game wasn’t actually affected by it the Dons were ass
i agree but the advantage call was probably right until he kicked it into the fifty. should of been high and should of been downfield as he had already kicked it
And I’m a huge AFL fan so I don’t really play favorites, I have no one team I root for, but I thought at the time I watched this years grand final that the Lions should not have had advantage paid on that kick late in the game. Not sure what the umpire that the advantage was.
2:57 - 50m is not against Shane Edwards on the mark, it's against the Richmond player running through the protected zone - this is correct as the player is not involved in the contest and makes no attempt to exit in a timely manner, instead choosing the run directly through in order to man up on Carlton #42 7:38 - It is not up to the umpire to determine advantage, just whether or not the play is continuous. It's just unfortunate that Zac Bailey probably didn't hear the whistle but he keeps playing and elects to kick it inside 50 a couple of seconds after the whistle has gone, so the umpire has to pay advantage, whether or not it is actually advantageous to Brisbane or not.
The Carlton v GWS one was it was the ruling at the time and as a Carlton supporter, i don't like this rule but if you have to enforce such a rule, the umpire was 100% correct. plus there has been legitimate proof that the ball was touched for the Melbourne V Carlton game
you need to remember that sometimes the umpire has deemed it as no prior meaning aslong as they attempt to hit the ball it should be play on. If the umpire deems the player as having prior they have to dispose of it correctly
We like to talk about the advantage in this years granny but Collingwood were absolutley stiffed of a few calls, with the Mason Cox free and the Markov 50m penalty
Don’t bother. No one wants to discuss this as it doesn’t fit their anti Collingwood narrative. Notice that they flat out ignore the comments discussing this point? Yet are quick to talk about the advantage call (that wasn’t even guaranteed to result in a goal anyway)
The AFL pay umpires to make sure certain teams win, this is to attract bigger crowds to the games so the AFL gets more money. It is all about money, not the sport.
4:12 This was an excellent umpiring decision, to be under so much pressure to make the correct call in a crunch final but still get the call right is a rare umpire W. They say there wasn’t sufficient evidence that the kick was a behind when there actually bloody was, I’ve played it back multiple times and if the goalpost were a bit taller then the ball would’ve crashed into it making it a behind. How should it be paid any different just because the goalpost wasn’t tall enough? Richmond fans have probably let this go by now but it truly was the correct call
It's the one's that keep getting given against a side doing everything right to get back into it , only to be crucified by consistently bad one sided decisions that beat the oppersition , umpires , it's breaking one teams heart with constant poor decisions ,
In part 3 can you add the one in round 6 2024 Adelaide vs Bombers in Adelaide 50 end Taylor Waker tackled Sam Draper and umpire did not call a holding the ball free kick and it would of been a kick after the siren.
A clip for another video: Port v WC round 1 2024, 2:20 left in the first quarter, Waterman runs about 1m out of bounds before centring the ball for a goal.
I don't know what was on part 1, but Cam Zurhaar getting pinged for deliberately kicking it out of bounds when he was kicking it towards his own goals makes zero sense.
Nothing wrong with the Carlton ones, Doc 50m free, Tigers player ran past the restricted area (mcintosh) or the Marchbank touch decision. And Coniglio not only showed dissent, but he yelled/abused/argued with the decision.
Bro, have you even seen a rule book? Apart from the incredible Cats running mark and two goal umpire calls, the rest are dubious at worst. Hardly the ‘worst of all time’. That 50 against the Tigers was NOT the umpire making a bad call, the AFL writes the rules not the field umpires. They are league employees and follow what the directors instructions. Expect to see that rule change for 2024.
as a brisbane supporter i hate the umpire that called it advantage like lachie would’ve kicked that goal or kicked in to the square and someone would’ve marked it then brisbane would’ve won
In the 2023 preliminary Final between Collingwood and GWS. With less than a minute to go for the game Nic Daicos grabbed Toby Greene around the neck and held by the neck for at least 30 seconds in plain sight of two umpires. To the that he was chocking and the umpires were yelling play on. Needless to say if that was any other player, the free would have been paid. From memory it was right on the fifty.
You forgot the one on the same Adelaide vs Collingwood game at the MCG where daicos CONVINCED the umpires to pay a downfield and 50m penalty yet the same thing happened to Adelaide not long before and their free kick was brought back
Highlights the advantage call, yet forgets to mention the incorrect 50m against Markov or Bailey encroaching the mark against Cox. Two incorrect calls that handed Brisbane two extra goals…
Not Hearing the umpires whistle is no excuse because Oleg had got paid a 50m penalty against him for not standing and he could not hear the umpire this ended up lead to a goal for Brisbane.
I hate people who live to talk shit about small umpiring errors. jeez do you want umpires in the game or not. I love your videos man, just not this stuff about the umps - the past is the past
The last one didn’t mean anything, bringing back the kick to Neale just allows Collingwood to set up. Plus 1 minute earlier a Mcluggage out of bounds resulted in a Daniher goal.
they should’ve had the opportunity to kick inside 50 and win the game, that’s the problem, we all know who matt stevic wanted to win the game anyway so it doesn’t surprise me
@@jesser5872 should not have even been in the position for this play to make a difference because previous goal should have been a ball in on the wing.
worst decicion has to be dom sheed from the boundary in 2018, should have been play on but it wasnt, plus rioli did an illegal shepard on maynard the same exact play
So you mention the crows not getting a free at the end of the game but fail to mention the worst quarter of umpiring this season in the first crows v pies game. Murphy smashed in face as he was about to take a mark. No mark, no free but is bleeding. Then he is being taken off by the trainers but play doesn’t stop. De Goey kicks the ball away from Murphy and trainers to avoid a collision and is penalised for deliberate! Johnson then tackled round head as he is in the goal square but play on! Seriously take off the Collingwood bias and call a spade a spade. It might give your vid some credibility
free kick to luke shuey in the elimination final against port, after the siren in extra time. Rat ducked into it and shrugged it up around his neck after first contact was around his chest. Cost port the game and probably a premiership.
Ahahahhaha crying much? Your team had 26 scoring shots to us 18. You had your chances but couldn't put us away. Port weren't winning the flag either way. They would've been belted by GWS or Richmond in the coming weeks. Cry about it.
@@crashwoahcoot6478 except port were winning untill that kick, which means port dominated the game other then kicking goals. Even the umps said sorry for the wrong call. Then a rule was changed because of it. Port would have won the flag that year.
@richardfairbanks1620 your team had your chances and wasted them. You were not beating GWS, you were not beating Richmond, and even if you beat both, you would've been destroyed by Adelaide. They already belted you twice that year and it would've been a repeat of 2007 if you played the Crows.
Brisbane got a goal from a 50 meters against Markov for no reason and when the smother Mason Cox in the protected area and was no 50m, had the umpire made all the correct decisions Collingwood definitely still would of won
@@blackmoon34785don’t bother, mate. Doesn’t fit their narrative. Brisbane handed two gift goals from those two calls, yet they’re busy crying about the advantage call, 65m out 😂
The Lynch behind was the correct decision. Hardly the worst umpiring decision. I watched that game in higher resolution than you are showing here and it was a behind.
Again opinion based on nothing. Knowledge of the rules and grey area interpretations would go along way to being fair rather than being opinion based on other opinions
![ละลาย (LALALYE) - DAOU PITTAYA ต้าห์อู๋ พิทยา [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wo6r9TgausI/mqdefault.jpg)
Robbie Gray took a mark and wasn't given a full 30 seconds to take his set shot (i think it was 15 seconds in the end) the umpire called play on and cheated port out of a win that day.
Nice video. This is the second in the series and while all the incidents highlighted are indeed dreadful decisions, the reality is you could probably make several hundred of these with equally bad umpiring blunders.
absolutely you could.
4:43 its a behind and can be proven with simple maths. the ball is seen directly over the goal post from mutliple angle, meaning if the post was taller, than the ball wouldve hit the post
thats how they decide i know as an umpire
Notice how a lot of this years big games cost by umpires
Also there are so many with Adelaide
In the 2009 grand final between St. Kilda and Geelong, Tom Hawkins snapped at goal and was awarded 6 points. Upon replay, the ball can be very clearly seen striking the post and changing direction yet it was called a goal. The ball-up that occurred gave Geelong a second goal giving them 11 extra points meaning that the final margin should've only been a point. Had the call been made correctly, the Cats would've led by a point, and under that sort of pressure, I'm pretty confident Geelong would've had to give and make a mistake. In my opinion, St Kilda should've won that Premiership.
In 2018, when Sydney played Hawthorn at SCG (last round of H&A), a free for deliberate out of bounds was paid against Paul Puopolo, a forward, which is rare. It was clear to everyone except the umpire that he was actually trying to keep the ball in. Didn’t affect the final result though.
Btw, who was Geelong player Leigh Colbear? During his playing career his name was always pronounced as it looks, not like the mock French-style pronunciation used by a famous comedian in the USA
Another great video KingKaleen, keep it up bro!
My Dad has physio that works for Carlton as a trainer. After the game he asked Caleb Marchbank if the ball had touched him and Marchbank responded by saying “ it touched my hand so clearly in nearly even touched my leg”. So to answer your question it was touched and the goal umpire was right.
We need to talk about all of the non high tackles against Collingwood vs GWS in the 2023 prelim that were *clearly* there, and compare them to all the high calls Nick Daicos got in the 2023 GF for dropping the knees/shoulder
Joel Selwood used to do the same
It doesn't matter whether a team gains an advantage from playing on from a free kick. The reason we have the advantage rule after a free kick, is if a team deems that (in this example) a kick inside 50 is more advantageous than taking the freekick. Unfortunately, in the grand final's instance, there was plenty of time after the whistle was blown, and I guarantee that he heard the whistle as he was meters away (especially considering thousands of supporters heard it), just may not have registered to well in his head.
Even if the free kick was paid, it would've had to have been a 60 metre kick from Lachie Neale, or an inside 50 against Collingwood's really strong defense. Just putting some words to some Brisbane supporters that think this one call "lost them the game"
There is a great one where Razor Ray called a quarter early due to a mistake with his ear piece
Love it! Hopefully my Gold Coast doco out this weekend
i will definitely watch it
@@Kaleen_YTty man ❤❤
Try watching American football. Holding, pass interference and roughing the quarterback are three things that are highly contested every game. I would say there are 30-40 questionable calls every weekend.
The 2016 Grand Final was abhorrent umpiring after half time if you are Swans fan. Worst umpiring ive ever seen was the Anzac Day game when Nathan Buckley mistakenly thought the crowd were booing Scott Pendlebury when he went up to collect the medal. That Leigh Colbert decision was a disgrace. Malceski deliberate rushed behind against the Blues in 2013 - a decision so terrible it's funny.
Mate i hate to be the one to point it out but Nathan Buckley accusing the crowd of booing Pendlebury was not umpiring. The umpire didn’t come out of nowhere and say “Crowd dissent follow me please 🤓“ The umpire actually isn’t relevant here except for the fact that Pendlebury deservedly won the ANZAC Medal. Don’t know what point you were trying to make by bringing that up.
@@musiceditz23 the crowd didn't stop booing because Collingwood won the game and the medal. The fact that Bombers fans stayed back after the game during the presentation showed how outraged they were.
@@melthoidserendipity1332 They were outraged because the team that won deserved it more? That’s pathetic sure the umpire was shit but that game wasn’t actually affected by it the Dons were ass
that wasn’t advantage. even if it was bailey got tackled high without the ball. this should of been downfield kick to Daniher . robbed
I agree
I agree
Bailey tackle wasn’t high.
i agree but the advantage call was probably right until he kicked it into the fifty. should of been high and should of been downfield as he had already kicked it
Now it's a high tackle too? I can't wait to hear in 10 years time about how he was killed on the field and the umpires didn't whistle.
the carlton vs richmond 50m wasn’t for shuffling on the mark. it was for the richmond play running around the outside in the protected area.
And I’m a huge AFL fan so I don’t really play favorites, I have no one team I root for, but I thought at the time I watched this years grand final that the Lions should not have had advantage paid on that kick late in the game. Not sure what the umpire that the advantage was.
2:57 - 50m is not against Shane Edwards on the mark, it's against the Richmond player running through the protected zone - this is correct as the player is not involved in the contest and makes no attempt to exit in a timely manner, instead choosing the run directly through in order to man up on Carlton #42
7:38 - It is not up to the umpire to determine advantage, just whether or not the play is continuous. It's just unfortunate that Zac Bailey probably didn't hear the whistle but he keeps playing and elects to kick it inside 50 a couple of seconds after the whistle has gone, so the umpire has to pay advantage, whether or not it is actually advantageous to Brisbane or not.
The Carlton v GWS one was it was the ruling at the time and as a Carlton supporter, i don't like this rule but if you have to enforce such a rule, the umpire was 100% correct. plus there has been legitimate proof that the ball was touched for the Melbourne V Carlton game
Can we talk about the swans vs dogs 2023 that was rigged af
can't remember that game, rigged towards who?
@@Kaleen_YTtowards the dogs and same as the gws dogs prelim the week before
collingwood v adelaide 2023 ash johnson got done high in the goal square
And Nathan Murphy
you need to remember that sometimes the umpire has deemed it as no prior meaning aslong as they attempt to hit the ball it should be play on. If the umpire deems the player as having prior they have to dispose of it correctly
Libbers goal was a point .. fans behind the goals thought so
looks like Libba was the only dog fully celebrating (or at least trying to con the umpire) - others weren't that sure
We like to talk about the advantage in this years granny but Collingwood were absolutley stiffed of a few calls, with the Mason Cox free and the Markov 50m penalty
Don’t bother. No one wants to discuss this as it doesn’t fit their anti Collingwood narrative. Notice that they flat out ignore the comments discussing this point? Yet are quick to talk about the advantage call (that wasn’t even guaranteed to result in a goal anyway)
@@Bugman04 I don’t even think Lachie Neale has that kind of a boot on him anyway. I’ve never seen him kick a footy beyond 30m
Imagine if it landed in a lions hands in front of goal but they called it back too. Lions fans would be fuming
Again! I loved it it was amazing like always good vid!
Thanks again! Glad you liked it.
The AFL pay umpires to make sure certain teams win, this is to attract bigger crowds to the games so the AFL gets more money. It is all about money, not the sport.
You forgot that goal in the grand final that put up a biff in this year's final
4:12 This was an excellent umpiring decision, to be under so much pressure to make the correct call in a crunch final but still get the call right is a rare umpire W. They say there wasn’t sufficient evidence that the kick was a behind when there actually bloody was, I’ve played it back multiple times and if the goalpost were a bit taller then the ball would’ve crashed into it making it a behind. How should it be paid any different just because the goalpost wasn’t tall enough? Richmond fans have probably let this go by now but it truly was the correct call
when I play footy with my mates I call it a behind if I see the ball go over the goalpost, that's how it should be. I also agree with your opinion
@@gggumball Cheers 👍🏼
It's the one's that keep getting given against a side doing everything right to get back into it , only to be crucified by consistently bad one sided decisions that beat the oppersition , umpires , it's breaking one teams heart with constant poor decisions ,
In part 3 can you add the one in round 6 2024 Adelaide vs Bombers in Adelaide 50 end Taylor Waker tackled Sam Draper and umpire did not call a holding the ball free kick and it would of been a kick after the siren.
A clip for another video:
Port v WC round 1 2024, 2:20 left in the first quarter, Waterman runs about 1m out of bounds before centring the ball for a goal.
Yay you uploaded
Can you do a video of how Brad Close got robbed for that free kick against St Kilda
might be in a part 3 if I do one
Thank you.
I don't know what was on part 1, but Cam Zurhaar getting pinged for deliberately kicking it out of bounds when he was kicking it towards his own goals makes zero sense.
Nothing wrong with the Carlton ones, Doc 50m free, Tigers player ran past the restricted area (mcintosh) or the Marchbank touch decision. And Coniglio not only showed dissent, but he yelled/abused/argued with the decision.
Bro, have you even seen a rule book?
Apart from the incredible Cats running mark and two goal umpire calls, the rest are dubious at worst. Hardly the ‘worst of all time’. That 50 against the Tigers was NOT the umpire making a bad call, the AFL writes the rules not the field umpires. They are league employees and follow what the directors instructions. Expect to see that rule change for 2024.
Gold Coast doco premieres at 2pm and part 2 + blooper reel at 3:15pm can you make it? If not I’ll premiere it next week :)
yes i can
@@Kaleen_YT perfect 👍 by the way I’m recording a video like this one I’ll credit u in the desc
@@LucUltraRWB appreciate it
@@Kaleen_YT nah ofc
@@Kaleen_YT also a lot of the ones you used in this video are in my vid
as a brisbane supporter i hate the umpire that called it advantage like lachie would’ve kicked that goal or kicked in to the square and someone would’ve marked it then brisbane would’ve won
In the 2023 preliminary Final between Collingwood and GWS. With less than a minute to go for the game Nic Daicos grabbed Toby Greene around the neck and held by the neck for at least 30 seconds in plain sight of two umpires. To the that he was chocking and the umpires were yelling play on. Needless to say if that was any other player, the free would have been paid. From memory it was right on the fifty.
crazy, i'll have to look back, didn't see that
Giants fan here, the free kick was towards the end of the 3rd quarter right outside our forward 50. I agree it should’ve been a free kick to Toby
You forgot the one on the same Adelaide vs Collingwood game at the MCG where daicos CONVINCED the umpires to pay a downfield and 50m penalty yet the same thing happened to Adelaide not long before and their free kick was brought back
Highlights the advantage call, yet forgets to mention the incorrect 50m against Markov or Bailey encroaching the mark against Cox. Two incorrect calls that handed Brisbane two extra goals…
Not Hearing the umpires whistle is no excuse because Oleg had got paid a 50m penalty against him for not standing and he could not hear the umpire this ended up lead to a goal for Brisbane.
This is a shocking call hahahaha
That 23 decision was fine and not like the Rocca goal at all. Even if a free kick had been given, it was too far out to score.
Got rid of the ball illegally, it's called incorrect disposal !
What about the siren gate freo vs st kilda
good idea
I hate people who live to talk shit about small umpiring errors. jeez do you want umpires in the game or not.
I love your videos man, just not this stuff about the umps - the past is the past
The last one didn’t mean anything, bringing back the kick to Neale just allows Collingwood to set up. Plus 1 minute earlier a Mcluggage out of bounds resulted in a Daniher goal.
they should’ve had the opportunity to kick inside 50 and win the game, that’s the problem, we all know who matt stevic wanted to win the game anyway so it doesn’t surprise me
@@jesser5872 should not have even been in the position for this play to make a difference because previous goal should have been a ball in on the wing.
Surely if we're talking about this years grand final, you also have to talk about Bailey encroaching on Cox's protected area?
And Markov being paid 50 against him for literally going back to man the mark....
Nah, no one wants to talk about this - doesn’t fit their narrative.
The Zac Bailey one was fine because he was outside of the protected area when play on was called.
@@BigDogBuba tell me you haven't watched it back, without telling me you haven't watched it back lmfao
🏈 The Mark Blicavs one vs Brisbane is a very bad non - decision by the umpire.
09 02 2024
for sure
If only it had been an actual advantage.
worst decicion has to be dom sheed from the boundary in 2018, should have been play on but it wasnt, plus rioli did an illegal shepard on maynard the same exact play
yeah fuck up carnt
missed by a mile he cant kick
HOW ABOUT JUST A 2017 GRAND FINAL COMPILATION
I’m gonna be honest the umpires just wanted Docherty to kick a goal so it would be a nice story coz there was no 50 penalty there
So you mention the crows not getting a free at the end of the game but fail to mention the worst quarter of umpiring this season in the first crows v pies game.
Murphy smashed in face as he was about to take a mark. No mark, no free but is bleeding. Then he is being taken off by the trainers but play doesn’t stop. De Goey kicks the ball away from Murphy and trainers to avoid a collision and is penalised for deliberate! Johnson then tackled round head as he is in the goal square but play on! Seriously take off the Collingwood bias and call a spade a spade. It might give your vid some credibility
I missed the first part of that game as I was busy so did not see the first quarter, but maybe you're right
It was in the last quater @@Kaleen_YT
what about the markov 50 in the 2023 gf?
yes, definitely
And Mason Cox smother in protected area
Brisbane wouldn’t won anyway if it was advantage then a goal degoey would do what he did 3 minutes early
free kick to luke shuey in the elimination final against port, after the siren in extra time. Rat ducked into it and shrugged it up around his neck after first contact was around his chest. Cost port the game and probably a premiership.
Ahahahhaha crying much? Your team had 26 scoring shots to us 18. You had your chances but couldn't put us away. Port weren't winning the flag either way. They would've been belted by GWS or Richmond in the coming weeks. Cry about it.
@@crashwoahcoot6478 except port were winning untill that kick, which means port dominated the game other then kicking goals. Even the umps said sorry for the wrong call. Then a rule was changed because of it.
Port would have won the flag that year.
@richardfairbanks1620 your team had your chances and wasted them. You were not beating GWS, you were not beating Richmond, and even if you beat both, you would've been destroyed by Adelaide. They already belted you twice that year and it would've been a repeat of 2007 if you played the Crows.
iam a demons fan and the one aginest carlton was an ovious goal
Neale would have to kick 62 metres to kick the goal soo…
Maynard block ?
The umpire was suspended after that
The 2023 season confirmed that games are rigged.
I am convinced the competition is rigged.
The game Brissy vs Richmond wasn't a bad call it was a behind
fax
4:40 richmond fan spotted
all true
Leigh Cold Bear 🐻
It was touched
1. Correct non - HTB, no prior made an attempt to dispose
Correct dissent FK
2. Jenkins goal ????
3. Missed HTB - Evade
4. Missed OOB decision
5. Missed HC (ump blindsided)
6. ??? need ump comms to confirm 50m
7. Score review inconclusive
8. Score review
9. Incorrect ball up decision, clean mark
10. Inconclusive
11. Inconclusive
12. Correct trip
Correct advantage, brisbane showed intent to continue with play
That advantage could’ve changed the result of the game
absolutely
Brisbane got a goal from a 50 meters against Markov for no reason and when the smother Mason Cox in the protected area and was no 50m, had the umpire made all the correct decisions Collingwood definitely still would of won
@@blackmoon34785don’t bother, mate. Doesn’t fit their narrative. Brisbane handed two gift goals from those two calls, yet they’re busy crying about the advantage call, 65m out 😂
The Lynch behind was the correct decision. Hardly the worst umpiring decision. I watched that game in higher resolution than you are showing here and it was a behind.
bro the lions still had 60 seconds to win there just bad. It was a free kick but they still had it in there 50 and they had lots of seconds left
Dammm
Crows v bommers
UP THE DEES
Again opinion based on nothing. Knowledge of the rules and grey area interpretations would go along way to being fair rather than being opinion based on other opinions
1st
Dawson statistically one of the worst kicks for goal in the league btw