How to Evaluate New Keyforge Decks!!!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 72

  • @r3m3mb3r-m3
    @r3m3mb3r-m3 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice video! You are articulate, well spoken, knowledgeable, informative, organized, concise, and you lucked out: you have a good voice. I gave u a like, a subscribe, and a notify... super rare for me.
    Keep up with the effort and content! Thanks for the strategic content. I love your rating scale and its reasoning/logic. You're on your way to great TH-cam success because your keyforge analysis is no-bullshit, all valuable info.

  • @allenherinckx4474
    @allenherinckx4474 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    You forgot the most important thing ... The NAME!

  • @TheNickarnett
    @TheNickarnett 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for the vid! I don't necessarily agree with all of the analysis, but i can appreciate the deck evaluation methodology.

  • @IamSooty
    @IamSooty 6 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Hi Kevbot. Your videos aren't very watchable because you don't reference the cards you're talking about so only the people who are super familiar with what card does what can follow.

    • @kevbot734
      @kevbot734  6 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Hey IamSooty thanks for the feedback. You make a really good point and I will do more in post-production to include card images. I am still new to editing so I am learning as I go. Thanks for being patient and I hope you stick around!

    • @angroidgames
      @angroidgames 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@kevbot734 I agree, I think it would be enough to zoom in or do a zoomed-in overlay of the card you are mentioning. People can then pause and read the card. Thanks for the guide though , hope to see more!

    • @poyi1013
      @poyi1013 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is better to say what the cards do rather than use picture.

    • @777Godsgift777
      @777Godsgift777 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kevbot734 just sub to you because of your awesome attitude towards criticism

    • @kevbot734
      @kevbot734  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@777Godsgift777 Thank you my man! All criticism comes from a perspective I need to hear.

  • @galdanith
    @galdanith 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hey- I've looked high and low for those house win stats, but I can't find them. Where are they available?

  • @anthonyv3977
    @anthonyv3977 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really like your channel! I hope you do more deck analysis videos like this one in the future. Cheers!

    • @kevbot734
      @kevbot734  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the feedback! The more comments I hear requesting this content the more likely I am to jump into a video (or possibly series), so it helps my topic choice a bunch!

  • @mr.mammuthusafricanavus8299
    @mr.mammuthusafricanavus8299 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have only played 4 games so far with my buddy and each game, as we got more familiar with the decks, has become quite intensely close matched. My two decks: Professor J Chronocode (Brobnar, Dis, Mars) and Heroine of Bloodworld (Dis, Logos, Sanctum). If we consider the decks in a MTG setting it feels like Prof is an aggro deck and Heroine is a Esper Control:P

    • @kevbot734
      @kevbot734  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice observations! I have definitely seen different archetypes as I have been playing the game, but most decks I own feel midrange to me. Glad you are enjoying this awesome game!

  • @KristDC
    @KristDC 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good word. You speak with a good rythm and you have a nice voice too.

  • @doctoraadhara5116
    @doctoraadhara5116 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, thanks

  • @enphernoe3963
    @enphernoe3963 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hope you grow big sir.

  • @cur1ous238
    @cur1ous238 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    +Kevbot where do you get your stats on crucible online from?

  • @Zatara14
    @Zatara14 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video man! Look forward to seeing more of your content. Can you talk about horseman at all and if they are actually as powerful as people think? I saw that people had offered a guy $200 or more for his 4 horseman deck and that just seems absurd to me this early on.

    • @kevbot734
      @kevbot734  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey Jordan, I did see that horseman deck as well. I didn't do an in-depth evaluation on it but it seemed EXTREMELY strong. In addition to the horseman, it also has Library Acess (w/ Phase Shift, Wild Wormhole, 2x Library of Babble to support), 2x Batdrone, Blinding Light, good Sanctum creatures, and a really strong Brobnar pool with multiple rares. I presume the cost was also inflated due to the fact that the best deck on TableTop Simulator features the horsemen suite as well. I think this is an S tier deck and is easily worth $100+, but ultimately it will depend on how the meta shakes out whether the guy made a good investment.

    • @LeftoverCurry8593
      @LeftoverCurry8593 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kevbot734 could you talk about table top simulator some time?

    • @kevbot734
      @kevbot734  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LeftoverCurry8593 What about it? I don't play on there so I can't give you a lot of info, unfortunately. If you want to play online the service I use is www.thecrucible.online/

  • @ironocy496
    @ironocy496 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Realized my deck has an otk in it. Sweet!

  • @Ravapra
    @Ravapra 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice job. I have a deck named Capitana “Butch” Moore, I won six matches and lost only one until now against a double martian zoo keeper that locked the game archiving all my creatures. It is a Dis-Logos-Untamed with only 3 rares but I think it has a lot of good cards: 3 Arise (054), 3 Quijo (144) and a good Untamed pack of cards 323, 325, 349, 351, 367, 368. What do you think about?

  • @wolfie766
    @wolfie766 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Kevbot, I took the information you provided into account, and tried to see how viable my decks are with still being confused about it since I have 10 to go through lol. Would it be possible to get your input on them on which are viable so I really can focus on my better decks and figure out their strategies?

    • @kevbot734
      @kevbot734  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The easiest way for me to do that is if you could just send me the Archon cards of all your decks to kevbot06gaming @gmail.com. That way I could quickly compare them for you! Let me know if I should expect an email.

    • @wolfie766
      @wolfie766 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for getting back to me, I sent an email out your way. Thank you again for taking the time@@kevbot734

  • @projetkad2363
    @projetkad2363 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi and thx for your video man.
    I like the "Rating scale" but on the "do nothing cards", really i've won some games with the said "do nothing cards" because somethimes like you have said, they contain Aember...
    Thank you for your work !
    kad

    • @kevbot734
      @kevbot734  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey Kad thanks for the input! You can definitely find good spots for those "do nothing" cards and get use out of them. I just find narrow cards to be less than optimal in most decks. It also depends on the strategy you are trying to pull off in the deck and synergies with other cards, there's soo many variables!

    • @projetkad2363
      @projetkad2363 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kevbot734 Hi Kev ! Yes you're right, by the way i've only a couple of runs out for the moment, so i'll try to find some opponents near my home to test my decks with ... narrow cards on ;) Thank you again for your kindness bro' '!
      kad

  • @danieljulia948
    @danieljulia948 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi mate i only gwt 1 deck for now and im feeling it a litle weak in my local community can u grade it pls. The deck is Ship Diffwhu from the Paniter's Maelstrom it is uploaded on the vault app.Thank you

  • @greeple3287
    @greeple3287 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You say Lost In The Woods is very situational but can you explain why you think this? The card can be played regardless of what's in play at the time you use it so it's an effective mini wipe on your opponents creatures especially if you have nothing in play at the time and you get the amber for playing it so i'm not sure what's not to like? Thanks

    • @kevbot734
      @kevbot734  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey Greeple great question! I probably was a little harsh on it since I lumped it in with some other cards while talking about it. It certainly is very good when I don't have any creatures on board. However, since I only have 11 total in the deck, it is usually bad to be trading resources evenly if I have creatures on board as I am less likely to draw more threats. Also, if the quality of my creatures is better than the quality of my opponents' creatures it is objectively bad. I disagree that is can be played regardless of what's in play since sometimes it can be bad for you. Hope this clears my reasoning up!

  • @broncofun5636
    @broncofun5636 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. Could you post a more extensive list of powerful cards to look for?

    • @kevbot734
      @kevbot734  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I can definitely work on that! I can for sure do commons and uncommon but rares and above are hard to evaluate since I don't have much experience with them. I know others have worked on this as well you might find more resources on the Keyforge subreddit!

  • @stimhack
    @stimhack 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good analysis!

    • @kevbot734
      @kevbot734  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks stimhack hope it helps this weekend!

  • @lythienne
    @lythienne 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm just wondering if either of my decks are good, they are The Damned Devil of Ludhell and The Tranquil Symbiote of Kvensund. They are both uploaded and my username is batDrone. Thanks!

    • @kevbot734
      @kevbot734  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      1) cool username
      2) cool deck name
      3) The first deck seems medium but definitely playable. Got a board wipe and a decent creature pool with some interesting aember interaction. The second deck, unfortunately, looks like a pile of doo doo unless I am missing something. Not nearly enough creatures and a lot of worthless artifacts. Don't have time now for an in-depth analysis but hope that works!

    • @lythienne
      @lythienne 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kevbot734 Thanks! Hopefully can get some new decks soon!

  • @MrRyoga84
    @MrRyoga84 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    hmm i have 27 creatures in one of my decks :)

  • @jacksongamsby3575
    @jacksongamsby3575 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a deck that's Brobnar, Untamed, and Dis. This same deck has 25 creatures, 4 artifacts, and 7 actions. Is this good?

    • @kevbot734
      @kevbot734  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      It certainly could be! I would have to see the list to know for sure. If you upload it to the Keyforge app I can look it up.

    • @jacksongamsby3575
      @jacksongamsby3575 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kevbot734 ok, I uploaded the deck, the name is Warlord Sunthunder Van Ecks and has 1 win 1 loss against my father's decks.

    • @mr.mammuthusafricanavus8299
      @mr.mammuthusafricanavus8299 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      WOW 25 creatures! That sounds cool:P

    • @kevbot734
      @kevbot734  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jacksongamsby3575 Hey JC just looked at it and tbh it looks average to me, but like I said I don't have experience with decks of this type so take that with a grain of salt. I would love to try the deck though. It seems if you get ahead on board, it would be pretty easy to control your opponents side with your big Brobnar and Dis creatures. A weakness of the deck is you don't really have a lot of removal or aember interaction, but like I said if you can play a control-minded game you could have some success!

    • @jacksongamsby3575
      @jacksongamsby3575 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kevbot734 thank you for your feedback!

  • @loneXolf
    @loneXolf 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I find "Lost in the woods" to be an amazing removal card more so when having no board which this deck will likely have often. But yeah double hallowed blaster is a yikes, and you have no amazing regrowth combos with only one witch, but it helps the deck cycle more creatures. Overall, I agree with your rating, I find that untamed kit and the double Hallowed Blaster is what really made the deck a 2/5

    • @kevbot734
      @kevbot734  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great analysis. Since playing more games, Lost in the woods has performed better than I presumed it would. I still feel like I am at an experience advantage most games, so the deck isnt being pushed that hard. I am glad you agree with my rating!

  • @kevinlandon1267
    @kevinlandon1267 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good vid!..one of my decks is unfortunately a broken deck. It's a Mars, Brobnar, and Shadows and out of 8 games using it I've only won once. I've used it against 3 different people including my wife and it still gets destroyed. Mars decks equal a big thumbs down.

  • @Logan-bk8lz
    @Logan-bk8lz 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Kevbot. I’ve watched several of your videos and find them very helpful in learning KeyForge :) I was wondering if you would take a look at my deck and give me an honest opinion. The name is Tidebreaker Wenton Bizdregs.

    • @kevbot734
      @kevbot734  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey Logan first off super grateful for the support. Im really glad they are helping :). I just took a quick look. I actually quite like this list. But just bc I like it doesn't mean its good.
      Good: Library Acess + Labwork + Phase Shift is sick. Effervescent Principle is very synergistic here. 2x Quixo and Anomal Exploiter are decent. Phosphorous Stars is super. Decent mars creature pool. Ghostly Hand, Misama, Old Bruno, Dodger, Miasma, Duskrunner are all good.
      Bad: 14 Creatures is pretty low. 2x Rocket boots with not much logos creatures. Speed Sigil and Ammonia Clouds seem bad in this lineup. Like zero threats creature wise, only a couple in Mars.
      If you pop off with LA you probably win, if not you will probably struggle to keep up with aember generation. But you probably have just enough steal + capture to have a game with most decks.
      3/5 I'd say right at average. Def playable especially if you like Library Acess!

    • @Logan-bk8lz
      @Logan-bk8lz 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for replying! Yeah I think it’s a pretty fun deck to play :)

  • @renaudmayard9551
    @renaudmayard9551 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi kevbot i m a french player of keyforge.
    Have you got an email or facebook account for send my deck? For see if a good deck because i don't understand all your strategies.
    Sorry for my bad english.
    Ps: i very like all vidéos. 👍

    • @kevbot734
      @kevbot734  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey Renaud thanks for the comment! Absolutely I would love to help; send me a picture of the decklist to kevbot06gaming@gmail.com.

  • @eliasmtg4916
    @eliasmtg4916 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im first deck, The Watcher that Massacres Followers. Has 20 creatures. And 4 board clears. Its really awkward

  • @heldergattoni
    @heldergattoni 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I found a unplayed deck decksofkeyforge.com/decks/0f4a45d6-aa17-455b-9963-1eab6d8c642e
    the big problem here is mars. It have only one creature in this house. And half of the cards in mars need mars creatures to work like Red Planet Ray Gun, Swap Widget (useless), 3x Squawker (can use only the stun), 2 x Psychic Network (can steal only 1 and only if u have ur unique creature in play), Mothership Support (can do only 2 damage and only if u have ur unique creature in play).
    that is the fist deck that i opened, got realy frustrated, but now i found a playable deck

  • @robsevendaysaweek
    @robsevendaysaweek 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent what does it matter if you don’t do any building of any kind? You have no control over you deck. So if I buy a shitty deck, I buy a new one.

  • @neckutter
    @neckutter 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I wonder why people think 18 creatures is the max? I like more creatures.

    • @kevbot734
      @kevbot734  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nice observation! More can certainly be better. I used 14-18 since that the average number for decks I have been having success with. Intuitively it seems like a good thing, provided the creatures are of decent quality. I have yet to play with a deck that has more than 22 so I can't really speak on its performance.

    • @mr.mammuthusafricanavus8299
      @mr.mammuthusafricanavus8299 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      18 creatures is half the deck.I find that my 18 creature deck typically does better than my 14 creature deck. I think it is interesting to note also that one of my decks has 4 rares and the other only 2:p

    • @hunterl5115
      @hunterl5115 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have 20 creature deck with untamed Shadow and dis and iv had good creature support but I don't have as many actions and artifacts

  • @zig131
    @zig131 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    My initial impression is that Creatures don't stay on the battleline for very long so I'm only interested in those that have Static effects, Play effects or Destroyed Effects. My assumption is that if I play a Creature that is good at Fighting or Reaping, my opponent will kill it before it gets a chance to do those things or at least before it gets to Fight/Reap more than once. The decks I have seen have a fair amount of Creature removal on-top of nearly every Creature being able to act as Creature removal. Playing only Creatures that you don't care about surviving also nullifies all your opponent's Creature removal and makes board wipes one-sided.

    • @kevbot734
      @kevbot734  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great insight Thomas. One of my ideas surrounding this game is the notion of a threat, which is a creature that has a static effect that your OP must deal with. You are totally correct and those are the best types of creatures, but obviously, you can't have all perfect creatures in every deck. One point about reap/fight effect: if your opponent is having to use resources on those cards, they are likely taking a nonoptimal turn for their own aember generation and card deployment. The easy example is they give up the opportunity to reap with their card to fight one of yours. Some of the strongest effects come with reaping, so I would not discount these cards!

  • @crimson90
    @crimson90 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I learned nothing.

    • @cleverestx
      @cleverestx 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I learned nothing by your comment. Just sayin'