Note***: I am aware of Linus' new video where he discussed poor latency response. Community thinking is his team left the default debounce setting as is, which I believe Glorious sets at 12-16ms(can't remember exactly but it's higher than most other company defaults). So that would make total sense as I didnt detect an increased 10-15ms delay over other mice. Especially in AimLabs that does track TTK I wasnt seeing an increase in my average timing over other mice.
@p man yeah I'm curious to see if the look into it more , but frankly they need to update their testing and also communicate how that feels in game/aim trainers. In terms of the weight thing like I said in the video there is a market for people who want a slightly higher weight , it's fine to have both options. Glorious just needs to make PRO versions of this and always be in stock , for the enthusiast side
Yeah LTT’s testing team is pretty incompetent it’s clear they didn’t adjust the debounce time and they do their mouse testing in web browser applications which is a huge no no. Them not testing properly and in turn blaming reviewers kinda sucks.
@@Chrishazy well said. Definitely a little out of their element on gaming mice but I'm sure Linus will get it in the right spot. The whole labs thing is a lot of moving parts for them . But ya I don't think they should be so quick to blame the reviewer
Out of all the reviews I've seen.. I think this is probably the best informed and most objective. There are better products out there, but they're more expensive. For the price, it's not THAT worth it, but discounted is absolutely worth it and one of the best at that price. That's what I've gathered. Honestly, it definitely has some issues and it's not a mouse for everyone (maybe just not for claw grip users). I had no issues with the original Model O. I've also tried Logitech G Pro Superlight and for me, I prefer the Model O's shape, the grip I use fits better for me and I like the side button placement.
Thats cool that they resolved your scroll wheel issue. I had the same issue with one of their mice and I got nothing. Had another issue with another mouse I bought from them and they didnt resolve that issue either. Its unfortunate to see so many people have a similar experience to what I had. I will never buy another glorious product again lol. Lesson learned
This is a hard pass for me, glorious took two steps forward in the right direction with the pro series but with some minor issues, then took 2 steps back with this mouse, they literally went back 2 years in terms of the mouse market evolution
Yeah that's totally fair ! but I think consumers having options is totally okay. Keep the standard weight mice but update the Pro series and keep them in stock like these. That way everyone has a good choice
@@UpgradeLemonade thats a really good point, cause everybody has their preferences but still if you put this mouse up against other recently released mice in a similar or even sometimes cheaper price range like the x2, lamzu atlantis, fantech aria, ninjutsuo sora, they all have relatively the same tech and better weight
@@mizuuukage a couple things on that... First off, those are all wildly different shapes. And a lot of those brands only have a very small catalogue of mice (some only 1 or two) Glorious has many different shapes of mice and products. Scaling everything in their lineup as quickly as others will take longer. 2nd ... The notion low weight is better or more "worth it" isn't necessarily a true thing. Some of the top aimers in the community still use a GPX which is a 61g mouse while others use things like GWolves HTX around 40g with similar scores. From an advancement standpoint sure it's impressive but that's why those things should go in the Pro series.
Personally, I like the aesthetic for honeycomb/circular. I'm not someone with tropophobia, so I'm fine with it. That said.. it is a big no in terms of how dirty it gets.. They probably don't want to use better materials for lightness to avoid higher costs, so the design is still around.
![กี่หมื่นฟ้า | Your Sky Series EP.1 [1/4]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vLGjxFL6U_I/mqdefault.jpg)
Note***: I am aware of Linus' new video where he discussed poor latency response. Community thinking is his team left the default debounce setting as is, which I believe Glorious sets at 12-16ms(can't remember exactly but it's higher than most other company defaults). So that would make total sense as I didnt detect an increased 10-15ms delay over other mice. Especially in AimLabs that does track TTK I wasnt seeing an increase in my average timing over other mice.
@p man yeah I'm curious to see if the look into it more , but frankly they need to update their testing and also communicate how that feels in game/aim trainers. In terms of the weight thing like I said in the video there is a market for people who want a slightly higher weight , it's fine to have both options. Glorious just needs to make PRO versions of this and always be in stock , for the enthusiast side
Yeah LTT’s testing team is pretty incompetent it’s clear they didn’t adjust the debounce time and they do their mouse testing in web browser applications which is a huge no no. Them not testing properly and in turn blaming reviewers kinda sucks.
@@Chrishazy well said. Definitely a little out of their element on gaming mice but I'm sure Linus will get it in the right spot. The whole labs thing is a lot of moving parts for them . But ya I don't think they should be so quick to blame the reviewer
@p man you mean entertainment and basic pc knowledge? Because they also lack in pc department. Compared to nexus, buildzoid, etc.
@p man yup, that what i thought when i saw "RandomFrankP mouse!" In recommendation. It's hilarious.
Out of all the reviews I've seen.. I think this is probably the best informed and most objective.
There are better products out there, but they're more expensive. For the price, it's not THAT worth it, but discounted is absolutely worth it and one of the best at that price.
That's what I've gathered. Honestly, it definitely has some issues and it's not a mouse for everyone (maybe just not for claw grip users).
I had no issues with the original Model O. I've also tried Logitech G Pro Superlight and for me, I prefer the Model O's shape, the grip I use fits better for me and I like the side button placement.
ngl I thought the o2 looked ugly in the renders, but it actually kinda looks cool now that I'm seeing it in reviews
Yeah it quite nice in person and starting to look less "generic" like some brands
Nice detailed review and comparison 🔥 I very much dislike mice that scoop over my palm when swiping! 😅
Thats cool that they resolved your scroll wheel issue. I had the same issue with one of their mice and I got nothing. Had another issue with another mouse I bought from them and they didnt resolve that issue either. Its unfortunate to see so many people have a similar experience to what I had. I will never buy another glorious product again lol. Lesson learned
Damn sorry :/ yeah they definitely can improve on customer care if that's the case
do the pretty lights make u aim faster?
+10% Hand Finesse Guaranteed ✅
@@UpgradeLemonade 🤓. be pretty cool if they gave the model o- some love or more small shapes.
@@ColByte agreed! Model o2 Minus or Minus Pro might be end game 😎
the most shocking part is how glorious made it a whole gram lighter
It do be shocking
@@UpgradeLemonade any plans on doing a review on the moondrop lans?
@@ApparentlyPeter probably not to be honest
@@UpgradeLemonade makes sense. What's the next review going to be about?
@@ApparentlyPeter the end game gear xm2we comes out later this week... Then early next week a mousepad roundup video for a few pads. Then we'll see 🙈
This is a hard pass for me, glorious took two steps forward in the right direction with the pro series but with some minor issues, then took 2 steps back with this mouse, they literally went back 2 years in terms of the mouse market evolution
Yeah that's totally fair ! but I think consumers having options is totally okay. Keep the standard weight mice but update the Pro series and keep them in stock like these. That way everyone has a good choice
@@UpgradeLemonade thats a really good point, cause everybody has their preferences but still if you put this mouse up against other recently released mice in a similar or even sometimes cheaper price range like the x2, lamzu atlantis, fantech aria, ninjutsuo sora, they all have relatively the same tech and better weight
@@mizuuukage a couple things on that... First off, those are all wildly different shapes. And a lot of those brands only have a very small catalogue of mice (some only 1 or two) Glorious has many different shapes of mice and products. Scaling everything in their lineup as quickly as others will take longer. 2nd ... The notion low weight is better or more "worth it" isn't necessarily a true thing. Some of the top aimers in the community still use a GPX which is a 61g mouse while others use things like GWolves HTX around 40g with similar scores. From an advancement standpoint sure it's impressive but that's why those things should go in the Pro series.
honeycomb mouse in 2024 BIG NO
Personally, I like the aesthetic for honeycomb/circular. I'm not someone with tropophobia, so I'm fine with it.
That said.. it is a big no in terms of how dirty it gets.. They probably don't want to use better materials for lightness to avoid higher costs, so the design is still around.