Fastest van track battle: Transit vs Sprinter

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ส.ค. 2014
  • We set out to answer the question that has set van man against van man for generations. Which is faster, the Mercedes-Benz Sprinter or Ford Transit?
    Subscribe to our TH-cam channel bit.ly/11Ad1j1
    Subscribe to the mag subscribe.autoexpress.co.uk/yt
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 887

  • @WhiteTenpenny
    @WhiteTenpenny 4 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    Only watching this to improve my driving because Amazon's expectations are ridiculous.

  • @MJC-GSXS750
    @MJC-GSXS750 8 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I think you should of used a dualy sprinter, as that would be a more equal comparison. It also looks like the dual wheels on the transit gives it an advantage in the corners imo

    • @bigsheamy
      @bigsheamy ปีที่แล้ว

      Strong springs too

  • @blkjet117
    @blkjet117 9 ปีที่แล้ว +463

    This comparison was flawed from the beginning. The vans should have similar lengths and suspensions. If one has dualies then both should.

    • @ryanprentice1232
      @ryanprentice1232 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      +blk jet agreed

    • @MJC-GSXS750
      @MJC-GSXS750 8 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      I totally agree and just posted a comment about that a couple mins ago. I found the dual wheel on the transit probably helped it in the corners, by producing more over steer, rather than under steer. That is just my opinion tho, and not sure how others feel on this comparison?

    • @Renakaevo
      @Renakaevo 8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      and the sprinter chasis is now 10 years old (its only a restyling) and the transit is brand new.

    • @ianwhinnett7465
      @ianwhinnett7465 7 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Whose fault is that? Sprinter is utterly rubbish, should be called the Black Death van. No wonder the handling is rubbish it shares the front suspension with a Bedford ha van. Clutches are a doddle though, useful to know. Owners will change lots.

    • @iritantNL
      @iritantNL 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Transit has more grip in the rear double air.. And do the test again with a ton in de back

  • @komirshtembari1657
    @komirshtembari1657 8 ปีที่แล้ว +245

    transit 155bhp and dual wheel
    speinter 130bhp single wheel.

    • @TheMx5Channel
      @TheMx5Channel 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Komir Shtem Its for the loading capacity.....

    • @maciekapocaliptic
      @maciekapocaliptic 8 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      +Komir Shtem Permissible maximum mass:
      Transit: 4600 kg
      Sprinter: 3880 kg

    • @harris7695
      @harris7695 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Komir Shtem, unfair test the sprinters a better van

    • @AIexMan
      @AIexMan 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Anything above 3,5 t needs a lkv license to drive and they are limited to 95 km/h

    • @maciekapocaliptic
      @maciekapocaliptic 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      In Poland you can order Transit 470 with factory reduction to 3,5t than you will have a 350 hd. In other words, it`s transit for heavier loads.

  • @adam200784
    @adam200784 10 ปีที่แล้ว +690

    Nothing is quicker than a rental Transit

    • @MinecraftianProduce
      @MinecraftianProduce 9 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      i agree

    • @MrAtcjohn
      @MrAtcjohn 9 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      try getting your hand on a mercedes sprinter 212d they burn transits off i had 130 mph out of mine

    • @joeegavin
      @joeegavin 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      adam Robinson
      lol

    • @qasimmir7117
      @qasimmir7117 8 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Or a stolen one.

    • @3DPeter
      @3DPeter 7 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      I own a 312 sprinter for 15 years, and it does 90 mph max. i do know that there was a "longer"
      rear axle available, but no way that one could do 130mph. 112mph max, so your speedometer
      must be broken, because the fail often and even i had to fix mine 3 times.

  • @dwright2104
    @dwright2104 9 ปีที่แล้ว +111

    not fair having the twin wheel vs single wheel

  • @critical_mass8279
    @critical_mass8279 9 ปีที่แล้ว +119

    To all those saying its a pointless test, it isnt a pointless test.
    For the bank robbers of the world this is really important. The Transit was the most used van for bank robberies in the UK and they need to know if there a better alternative lol

  • @barbackers
    @barbackers 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just watched a few shows, great job. Can't wait for pt. 2 of the MX 5/Boxter battle! Subbed!

  • @daveberkovits4976
    @daveberkovits4976 9 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    You guys in Europe are lucky to have your choice of automatic and manual transmissions in new pick-ups and vans. Here in the U.S everything you buy has an automatic transmission.

    • @roywhiteo5
      @roywhiteo5 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      i wish my f150 had a 6 spd manual option

    • @daveberkovits4976
      @daveberkovits4976 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      roywhiteo5 I wish it did too.

    • @MrViegar0
      @MrViegar0 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I wish I lived in us most things here are manual I'd kill for a auto pickup

    • @CitarNosis317
      @CitarNosis317 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Dave Berkovits You do know that US vans and cars are MUCH MUCH more powerful, right? A US Transit even with an automatic gearbox is a BEAST compared to our whimpy DPF fitted ones.
      DPF murdered performance on any vehicle - and there is no end in sight.
      People said even stricter laws are on the way for Europe.
      So... yeah, we envy YOU, for having proper, fast, powerful cars, vans.
      I would give up transmission any day just to have enough power.

    • @Nonamenever557
      @Nonamenever557 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dave Berkovits But you also get v8s in your vans and pickups, we have 4 cylinders in most

  • @archechme
    @archechme 9 ปีที่แล้ว +113

    This test is stupid and unfair. The vans should have the most similar layouts possible. The reason why the Transit handled better is because it had a dual wheel rear axle and the Sprinter didn't. The sprinter was also a lot longer. They should have both been like the Sprinter with a single rear axle in a RWD format.

    • @sobolanu8671
      @sobolanu8671 9 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      i agree with you!
      i have a Mercedes Sprinter 511 with double wheels and it handles better than with simple wheels
      The 313 has only about 130 HP
      They should drive a 318 or a 319 to see what a Sprinter can do!

    • @archechme
      @archechme 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yep or even a 515, lol.

    • @sciroccopower3135
      @sciroccopower3135 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bjork Vlogdok i agree

    • @bfcricky
      @bfcricky 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The sprinter isn't as tall, therefore has a lower centre of gravity. That balances it out so its fair.

    • @adam200784
      @adam200784 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Bjork Vlogdok The LWB transit is roughly the same length as the LWB Sprinter

  • @Rocknium1
    @Rocknium1 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    You guys are out of your Minds :D I like your videos.

  • @edwardmiranda6922
    @edwardmiranda6922 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    thats the best video i have ever seen, props to you bud driving that crazy , how didnt you tip the vans lol!!

  • @syedomarnorth2561
    @syedomarnorth2561 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Video was epic,please do more if these,do City car track battle next ;)

  • @redlinethin
    @redlinethin 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I didnt think I'd enjoy this... but I did! Fun video!

  • @santadog9
    @santadog9 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    For almost a year, I was set to buy a Sprinter. Compared, test drove, watch all the youtube vids, read as much as I could.. then, I spoke to an old family friend who is a certified Mercedes mechanic for as long as I have been alive, and drives Mercs. He said the Sprinter is the only Merc he won't endorse. I was stunned. He gave his reasons, and I asked which van to go with, and he said Transit. I would never guess him to recommend Ford ever. Then said the Transit is outselling Sprinter in Europe.
    I got my Med/Med Transit Van in June. I love the pick up on it, and it was a blast to drive in the Colorado Mountains back in August. I hung a hammock in it. :)

    • @jimofannarbor1472
      @jimofannarbor1472 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Did you get the diesel or one of the gas engines? Thanks!

    • @santadog9
      @santadog9 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jim of Ann Arbor I was going to do a build this past summer, and get the Diesel with windows all around, but when I stepped up, building was done for 2016, and the 2017's no longer had the windows for the cargo van as an option, so I bought used.
      Eco Boost 6cyl gas.

    • @harris7695
      @harris7695 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Deanna Szuter , I really think the sprinter is better though, they refuse to die and there's so many more older models than there is older transits left.

    • @santadog9
      @santadog9 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mechanical Madness Do you have one? Again Not according to my Father's Best friend who was a Merc cert mechanic all my life. And I'm 48 years old. He said don't get it. First time I've ever heard that. I'll take the advice of a mechanic I've known all my life to the opinion of some guy who says "I really think the springer is better". I'm happy with the Transit. It's a 2015, so I'll have it for the next 15 years barring anything horrible..
      The pick up is amazing, and it doesn't top out at 82mph!!

    • @matthewp8003
      @matthewp8003 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@santadog9how’s that transit doing 7 years later?

  • @atahanozaydin
    @atahanozaydin 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good Battle!

  • @DionysisX
    @DionysisX 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Used to have a '06 Transit Medium Wheel Base - Full Height 2.3lt Petrol for my business. I bought it brand new and let me tell you from times to times I would drive it myself as well and it would make me smile! That thing was serious fun to drive! My driver told me that he thought it was actually way better than his Opel Astra! I couldn't agree more. It had a really well sorted out chassis, really good steering and brake feel. Keep in mind that my personal car was a quite rapid hot hatch so it was a surprise to actually find some love in a....van! LOL

  • @navneetverma1000
    @navneetverma1000 10 ปีที่แล้ว +93

    They should make an AMG van from Merc

    • @meadroad
      @meadroad 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Navneet Murti Mercedes make a Brabus spec, in the Vito... over 200 bhp

    • @yahyasajid5113
      @yahyasajid5113 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Apart from the fact it wouldn't sell a 500+bhp van would be awesome. Also it would just be a bigger r63 amg

    • @rogueleader6509
      @rogueleader6509 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They did. A V8 biturbo 503 bhp! Amg sprinter 63S look it up. It's wicked

    • @lethargicstove2024
      @lethargicstove2024 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Then Ford makes a transit raptor

  • @GewelReal
    @GewelReal 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That Transit sounds lovely. Very enjoyable to watch

  • @markuslappalainen6847
    @markuslappalainen6847 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This was very helpful. I need a work Van and i have a habit of being late. No More.

  • @lukahenigman8453
    @lukahenigman8453 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    This looks so fun!

  • @OverlandTT
    @OverlandTT 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice review - I will add that the Sprinter is almost a 20 year old chassis design where the Transit was all new from the ground up.

  • @mak450
    @mak450 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Surprisingly entertaining

  • @arasb3258
    @arasb3258 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, to actually see someone enjoying driving a van fast? I thought I'd never see this... pretty cool.

  • @supremewhip
    @supremewhip 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There was no point in this, but it was damn entertaining.

  • @TMFM458
    @TMFM458 10 ปีที่แล้ว +97

    Why did they put a mercedes sprinter with a weakest engine and without dual wheels, that is not a fair comparison. Mercedes have vans with dual wheels, and faster engine too.

    • @user-jz3vc9kd2j
      @user-jz3vc9kd2j 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      TMFM458 LOL the Transit comes with the ecoboost twin turbo gas engine...315 horse...it will leave any sprinter in the dust.

    • @chele089
      @chele089 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      1 2 It doesn't in Europe. There the sprinter's got the advantage with its Turbodiesel V6.

    • @limcharles9730
      @limcharles9730 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      for equal price comparison?

    • @davidjoseph1559
      @davidjoseph1559 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah but the Transit is still on top

  • @vp8392
    @vp8392 10 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Every turn he took i was like.. Now it will roll..Right here.. Oh close

  • @shaunmark1
    @shaunmark1 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is excellent, fun and kinda serious.

  • @mattrussell250
    @mattrussell250 10 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Bit unfair - a 130bhp Sprinter against a 155bhp Transit! Surely the 316 Sprinter with 160bhp would have been a better match?
    I'd like to see the Sprinter 319 V6 4x4 go round in low-roof, SWB form. Bet it'd cut those times down by 10-15 seconds!

    • @manumaxone
      @manumaxone 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good point!

    • @bazzie85
      @bazzie85 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      you need more than just power around a technical circuit like this. The 316 Sprinter might come closer to the transit, but there is no way in the world that it would cut 10-15 seconds off the lap time, because that would land you right into MX-5 territory.

    • @BradAshworth
      @BradAshworth 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I think they were looking more at price too!

    • @omarns
      @omarns 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      they're at the same price point so its fair

    • @fatihgumus6753
      @fatihgumus6753 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I have already tried it
      Ford wins, no doubt

  • @cutsomeone
    @cutsomeone 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just came to see if someone else had as much fun driving a transit as I do driving one everyday.
    It has to be the greatest introduction to rear wheel drive ever.
    I don’t even know what car delivers as much enjoyment just puttering around town without ever really having to exceed 60mph.
    A Miata maybe?

  • @997speedy
    @997speedy 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    more van track battles :)

  • @sjoerdburger8743
    @sjoerdburger8743 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow, watching this video I've got a great idea. What if you'd equip vans with the same seating arrangement as the McLaren F1? Since there are three seats already the only issue would be the connection of the steering wheel to the front wheels. But you'll be getting some mad handling

  • @x-man4702
    @x-man4702 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Geeat video! I would LOVE to see a Transit Connect vs a Fiat Doblo!

  • @xboxcrazee
    @xboxcrazee 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    no doubt the twin rear wheel transit had thr edge with more grip on the road...

  • @PrimiusLovin
    @PrimiusLovin 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Always loved the Transit, but I would also like to see a comparison that included the smaller passenger Transit, now called Transit Custom, in the 3.2L TDCi/Power Stroke I5 (rear wheel and 4wheel drive configurations) and/or the petrol 3.7L Cyclone V6 rear wheel drive

    • @Digi20
      @Digi20 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We do not have those big engines here in Europe ;) And the Transit Custom is always front wheel drive here.

  • @edv1912
    @edv1912 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ha ha ha ha ............still laughing. This is truly entertaining!. Thanks.

  • @jamesstephenson4422
    @jamesstephenson4422 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im sure you can turn traction control off, in the menu on the screen in the Instrument cluster. if its anything like a focus menu etc

  • @PotenzaCorsa
    @PotenzaCorsa 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    sickest review ever.

  • @mustsilm
    @mustsilm 10 ปีที่แล้ว +90

    Is this for bank robbers?

  • @jenniewilliamsmural
    @jenniewilliamsmural 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I see +Bjork Vlogdok also made the same observation - it does make sense to make sure that the 2 dueling vans as close as possible specs.

  • @AKABLACKKGYPSY
    @AKABLACKKGYPSY 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    looks like great fun chap!..lol

  • @almostinanambo
    @almostinanambo 10 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    think you guys could do an ambulance vs a police van? ;)

  • @RhysWills-bv3jb
    @RhysWills-bv3jb 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is how delivery drivers blast round by my house

  • @nickharris8274
    @nickharris8274 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I've had my Transit for nearly three years & love it to bits which I never thought I ever could.Ford have definitely upped their game.

    • @doctorboy5892
      @doctorboy5892 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Update please. Come on Nick how many things have broken and how many times have you been screwed trying to get them fixed.

    • @paintboy212
      @paintboy212 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@doctorboy5892 we have a 2018 at my work ive put over 100,000km on it, no issues so far..

    • @uppertributaries
      @uppertributaries 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@doctorboy5892 they are extremely reliable and cheap and easy to work on if needed.

    • @doctorboy5892
      @doctorboy5892 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@uppertributaries What are? I have forgotten what I wrote.

  • @cottagegymfun
    @cottagegymfun 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please do another test based on the 2019 models

  • @ssk3204
    @ssk3204 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Let's see a follow up with the New FORD AWD and Sprinters 4X4!

  • @pfandfreak8270
    @pfandfreak8270 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    On which circuit is this video recorded?

  • @goclunker
    @goclunker 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the Sprinter and recently i rented a transit and love it too. Both are excellent

  • @minitrundle
    @minitrundle 8 ปีที่แล้ว +99

    I think the Mercedes is much better looking than the Ford. Only the smaller Transits look good. These hi-tops looks odd personally.

    • @netfliks2813
      @netfliks2813 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      u guessed it

    • @Nick_Sand_Bager
      @Nick_Sand_Bager 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      From the back yes the biggest transit looks ugly

    • @louisok8948
      @louisok8948 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Adam Shellard o yeh! Thats right🤔

    • @SMGJohn
      @SMGJohn 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      No one buys a van for its looks, no one.

    • @berendtwohl-bruhn4668
      @berendtwohl-bruhn4668 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Adam Shellard yaah

  • @robertbidochon7949
    @robertbidochon7949 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    These two seems just perfect, what do I do? pick one blindfolded?

  • @jenniewilliamsmural
    @jenniewilliamsmural 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Can you really compare a doolie with a non-doolie? Double tires in the back (Ford ONLY) changes the ride completely - and would for Mercedes as well. Would have liked to see a more even match - because we are actually trying to make up our minds right now on this question. Thanks though for a great battle!

    • @stevel1451
      @stevel1451 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes and a 316 sprinter needs to be used for comparison. Maybe someone is a bit bias here

  • @comdrive3865
    @comdrive3865 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    this is going to be the van i get if i ever get one new lol

  • @coldshoulder4056
    @coldshoulder4056 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:25 Driving the van like he'd drive a wheelchair!

  • @alceuzinho
    @alceuzinho 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    A car journalist having fun without drifting...

  • @schanche1965
    @schanche1965 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Should do it again but include the equivenen Peugeot/Citroen and Iveco offerings

  • @TheSuperMotoHooligan
    @TheSuperMotoHooligan 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good times for sure...

  • @Zackary-gp7eh
    @Zackary-gp7eh 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    they should do pickups next

  • @dragonbutt
    @dragonbutt 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Also i have to wonder, if you pulled the fuse to the stability control in the transit (since you cant turn it off) would it flop over onto its side? It rolls a TON more than the sprinter, and is faster.

  • @Kneedragon1962
    @Kneedragon1962 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting. I used to drive cabs in Brisbane, Australia. I did at one time drive Maxi Taxis, yes, the vomit comet. My boss had a Sprinter, and a Transit. Two things to say. (1) With the options we had, the Sprinter handled well, not quite sportscar, but way closer than you'd think. The Transit thought it was a Greyhound Bus. Now that said, in pouring rain and when grip got very, VERY bad, the transit got better, but on anything like a normal dry road, the Sprinter KILLED it. (2) Both these beasts come in a bewildering array of options. Doing a normal test of a car would be easy. Comparing two cars would be fairly easy. Comparing two cars that come in many different varieties, get's harder. In a case like this, all you can do is state very clearly what the options are on the one(s) you have, and compare them. I did always wish the Sprinter I had, had a lot more power, because it was quite fun to drive. You just had to get used to the size of it. I had a long running fantasy I used to giggle over, of hiding a twin turbo V8 under one....

  • @thebuildmaster5482
    @thebuildmaster5482 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Every dpd driver be watching this saying i smash that time 🐐😂😂

  • @hadyanth
    @hadyanth 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    And for our next logically sound comparison video..
    Best salad tossing hair-dryer model: Braun vs Vidal Sassoon

  • @PerformanceY
    @PerformanceY 10 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    So which one should I take to beat Nurburgring records?

    • @DionysisX
      @DionysisX 10 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Definitely the Transit

    • @morbvsclz
      @morbvsclz 10 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Neither of those... You should take a VW Transporter with the 200hp gas engine, 4 motion and DSG gearbox. Will be less practical though :-D

    • @cdbtheclaw
      @cdbtheclaw 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The current lap record for vans on the Nürburgring was made with a Ford Transit which was driven by Sabine Schmitz for Top Gear. She did it in 10min 8sec, which is faster then most normal driver go around there with their Porsches and stuff. You have to watch the video it is just funny to see how she overtakes everybody in a van.

    • @HexaSquirrel
      @HexaSquirrel 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Transit P1

    • @drt5665
      @drt5665 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      just use the xj 220 swapped top gear version of the transit

  • @realimbored668
    @realimbored668 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's the equivalent measures for the engine in US measurements? As in horsepower and pound-feet of torque

  • @revolution51
    @revolution51 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    4:36-You are killing me...!

  • @iamtheAtomicPenguin
    @iamtheAtomicPenguin 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Didn't think I'd say that but the Transit wins in the field of looks! I've had my driving license for 7 months but still haven't driven a van, I really want to give it a try! :D

    • @adam200784
      @adam200784 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Its great fun, I find driving them easier than a car

  • @ce9345
    @ce9345 ปีที่แล้ว

    You all should try that same test with a Chevrolet Express or GMC Savanah Van!

  • @andreadevetak4325
    @andreadevetak4325 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    We test the 470 L4H3 version in the base trim.

  • @ebinbelji7381
    @ebinbelji7381 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you drift any of those of you want to ?

  • @acronus
    @acronus 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    The transit can be had here in North America with the ecoboost turbo v6. In the van, it's detuned for 300 ish horsepower. A lot more is possible.

  • @RandomOtherPerson
    @RandomOtherPerson 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nothing handles like a Sprinter, very very stable and confidence inspiring at high speed. The Transit is nimble in slow stuff but makes one very nervous at speed. As someone who does thousands of miles a week in a way you'd never expect a van to be driven, I know.

    • @stevel1451
      @stevel1451 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your right, I know we run both vans

  • @l.acemorris3505
    @l.acemorris3505 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    But you got to remember that's the long wheelbase like you said

  • @elmanitasdeplomo
    @elmanitasdeplomo 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    They're unfairly compared imho. The rear wheel setup makes quite a bit of difference, the transit probably has a heavier rear axle and beefed up springs as well.

    • @elmanitasdeplomo
      @elmanitasdeplomo 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just to add: I think the ford is the better van to drive, even with a normal rear wheel set up.

    • @iomex_
      @iomex_ 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I did think that. The Transit showed a 5t chassis, but he said it has a 1t load carry? Does that mean it's not a 5t chassis, but you can opt for twin rear wheels on the 3.5?

  • @nyc863
    @nyc863 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    now do an RS5 vs an M5 comparo - visiting ikea to buy and take home a flat pack kitchen. It makes as much sense :)

  • @deudjuidigital
    @deudjuidigital 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why you guys didn't use a sprinter with dual rear wheels like the Transit.

  • @tx2sturgis
    @tx2sturgis 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wish Ford, Dodge, Mercedes etc would offer a standard transmission in our vans here in the US...I like rowing thru the shifter when I'm driving a truck.

  • @Stephanie9959
    @Stephanie9959 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was scary.

  • @Cb7sohc
    @Cb7sohc 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    dually vs single set up comparison?

  • @gavinhosler5503
    @gavinhosler5503 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Normally I would choose a vehicle but these are a few of my favorite car companys.

  • @ScottPC
    @ScottPC 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    When I rented a van I have to admit there pretty fun!

  • @zoximrai2207
    @zoximrai2207 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Work for FedEx here and drive both the ford transit and Mercedes sprinter utilizing both of their gear shifters and both have dual clutch transmissions
    Ford transit does perform better imo, corners better, more dynamic, responsive, powerful, and rigid.
    Sprinters on the other hand have softer independent suspension, so they do flow through corners but bounce like crazy making it difficult to maintain traction for both tires. I’ve only driven diesel sprinters so there’s less power but when the turbo kicks in it’s fun af and fuel efficiency is much better. Tbh I fun sprinters more fun to drive, it requires more finesse with throttle control to fling the rear into a corner but also note that they are longer and come with much larger wheels. Also, they require a lot of maintenance that FedEx contractors don’t usually set time or money into.
    In summary, performance winner is transit but imo sprinters are more fun. Glad this video is out there to put my opinion out there considering I spent lots of time comparing the two vehicles

  • @PedroFTeixeira
    @PedroFTeixeira 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best track battle ever!
    Finally one that you don't know the outcome before the test ever begun! :)

  • @MaZEEZaM
    @MaZEEZaM 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am really surprised how stable vans are these days, I remember in the early 90s being a passenger in my friends van finding it scary as he went round sharp corners because of huge body roll.

  • @tonytran5608
    @tonytran5608 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Under 301 club =)) that vid was fun

  • @allanmacbadger5692
    @allanmacbadger5692 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Auto Express never seem to do absolutely like for like tests, however I had a 2013 Ford Transit Custom double cab Limited and I had a friend who had a similar age Mercedes Vito, have to say the Transit beat the Vito hands down in every way, don't remember driving anything that was so lethal going around corners in the wet as the Vito, reminded me of driving an old Ford Thames van.

  • @jesuss9709
    @jesuss9709 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    stability control? whats that?

  • @giutubospatubo1546
    @giutubospatubo1546 7 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    Obviously sponsored add. A really bad comparison. Auto Express is the looser here...

  • @LaLa-yp6dk
    @LaLa-yp6dk 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    My 2020 sprinter has been in the shop more than on the road 😰

  • @yokonsetsu
    @yokonsetsu 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Let's see some fully loaded track test's if your going to mention the carry weight. Im sure we would see at least 1 go over if not both

  • @dbauernf
    @dbauernf 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really wish you had a faster Sprinter.

  • @calvinwong8090
    @calvinwong8090 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow he is soo brave :) I wouldnt dare to push a van like this too scary

  • @erosangelos9422
    @erosangelos9422 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I thought you could do better than this))),,, I Like The Video ,Lets Transit!
    Thanks!

  • @JETZcorp
    @JETZcorp 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'd like to see a V10 Econoline van in this comparison. It'd handle like a dump truck, but they have some damn impressive power, as you'd imagine.

  • @krbuilders4685
    @krbuilders4685 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should try the new sprinter

  • @Brascofarian
    @Brascofarian 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    When Sprinters first came out they were well named, those things could shift for such a big lump of metal.

  • @WynterK
    @WynterK 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow the Ford rotates ever nice for its size. I can't tell it's sharp handling. Interesting

  • @freeganjustin6699
    @freeganjustin6699 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Only 1.1 tonnes payload? In a vehicle that size? I'd be terrified of being caught overloaded. My 1980's Sherpa 250 took 1.2 tonnes, legally, and it was half this size.

    • @tech4pros1
      @tech4pros1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      The low payload rating is due to European laws on goods vehicles and driving license classes, which go by the gross weight of the van. On a normal car license in Europe you're only allowed to drive up to 3.5 tons, any more you need a LGV license. Also anything over 3.5t used for commercial purposes needs a tachograph and all the regulations that go with those. As I understand it on a normal US car license you can drive anything up to 26k lbs (12.5 ton). Some US pickup trucks would be classed as LGV's here in Europe due to a

  • @aaron___6014
    @aaron___6014 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Posture man!!!

  • @lefrog87
    @lefrog87 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm not convinced, given the difference in costs that this was a very equal test. A comparison using mechanically similar specs would perhaps have been more objective. I would have preferred for them to have had the same axle setup, length, if possible similar payload capacity and equalish power to get a better idea. What about a run round a track with a 500 to 750kg payload just because we rarely run empty... I was very impressed with the reliability of my transit but I'm but one person and I'm not going piss on other people's choices or preferences.

  • @otomobilgezegenim947
    @otomobilgezegenim947 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice

  • @CoffeeTechClub
    @CoffeeTechClub 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i dont know why you think twerking in your seat will make the car go faster