How did the girl in the third story? Close the door behind her when she first got in the vehicle. For her to be reaching around and then discovering. There is no handle, makes no sense. Because she would have realized it when she got in the vehicle. And tried to grab something to pull the door shut. It's not that a door can't be shut without a handle. But we're talking about getting into a strange vehicle and you automatically just go for the handle and when there is none you then can't be surprised later on.
He could've held the door for her, closed it and gone back to the driver's side. That was still fairly common back then. The story doesn't specify HOW she got in the car, after all.
Wait a minute, now let me get this straight. It's dark the houses are in the woods. There's a whole lot of discussions, so they're all aware about this black panther. That's roaming through the town, and even the guys themselves were nervous about it, to where they both went together. Instead of alone and they both carried guns, and yet you're trying to say that a young girl thought, oh wow, I'll do a prank or joke, and out in that darkness with that rumor that everyone's afraid of, and this girl, alone, goes out there without a gun without a flashlight and actually hides in the. Woods with the idea of just giving these guys a scare. No way, Jose. No young girl in a cabin at night in the dark is gonna go outside alone without a weapon, and hide in the woods just for the sake of a joke. Sorry, don't buy it.
It seems like you're disbelieving things just for the sake of disbelieving them... The premise of everything you wrote is "that would make these people dumb and that's impossible"... Everyone involved were being dumb. The guys for firing at something they couldn't see, despite no movement in their direction and the girls for thinking it was a good idea to prank their boyfriends in the middle of the night, when they'd both just bought guns and had taken them with them. Dumbness very much exists.
@VelkanAngels Well, you're entirely wrong as to what I said and second of all it seems to me. You're a little bit off base. Just by view and my internal brain working because nothing. You said came out of my mouth so you've decided what I was thinking. The one thing you said that makes entirely good sense is the fact that they were all dumb. Disbelieving things just for the sake of disbelieving. Really? That in itself makes no sense. No, the disbelieving by me was based on a concept put forth by the story. I still do not believe any young girl. Under the existing circumstances as described w. Have ever gone out there alone and hid in the dark if they believed the story of the panther. There is a huge difference between being dumb and doing something that if you were truly petrified, you wouldn't do. It might also be dumb, but it's not the motivation. And the motivation is the fact that it wouldn't happen. You wouldn't reach the stage of dumber, not. Of course, the guys were dumb for shooting at a sound in the night. I didn't address it because I didn't need it to be addressed. Now, that would be dumb and that, I would believe even if it's far-fetched. But under no circumstances would I believe that this young lady would do what she did. And then of course is the fact that it's a story. No more, no less no proof no names. Know nothing. But to determine that I for some reawant to disbelieve something. So thus, I wrote all those words to justify the fact that I don't believe it when, in fact, each thing that I said that happened in the story was a repetition of what happened in the story. And what was so important for you to write such a thing about nothing. You couldn't let it go. You just had to straighten out that guy who wrote something that you don't believe that he believed it. Where in this case didn't believe it. I'. M mostly amazed at the fact that you had anything to say because what you wrote entails your reading my mind and that's a big step.
No, these are not stories from the Paulanergarten. All three stories are true, you can google the names and places in the video and easily find multiple news articles from various real sources. I'd link them, but my comment would probably get flagged for spam if I post a link. I'm a big skeptic when I watch Mr. Ballen, and he does sometimes source things from Reddit stories that are unverified, but these are not those.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 87 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "ก้องชัย vs โชคปรีชา"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YN6e7HVnekw/mqdefault.jpg)
Yes! More of these. Such a good channel! 🤙
Babe...Wilburn Shenanigans just posted some Mr Ballen!!!
Calling another man babe is crazy UNC 😂😂
How did the girl in the third story? Close the door behind her when she first got in the vehicle. For her to be reaching around and then discovering. There is no handle, makes no sense. Because she would have realized it when she got in the vehicle. And tried to grab something to pull the door shut. It's not that a door can't be shut without a handle. But we're talking about getting into a strange vehicle and you automatically just go for the handle and when there is none you then can't be surprised later on.
He could've held the door for her, closed it and gone back to the driver's side. That was still fairly common back then. The story doesn't specify HOW she got in the car, after all.
Cougars, mountain lions, puma, and panthers in North America are the same thing.
I don't see how the Ted Bundy story is a prank, or even the bank one for that matter.
its not. the series is 3 STORIES THAT SOUND STRNAGE BUT ARE TRUE. he then adds a teaser about one of the stories in the title
@josh_cdb2412 Got it. Commented on the wrong title.
Wait a minute, now let me get this straight. It's dark the houses are in the woods. There's a whole lot of discussions, so they're all aware about this black panther. That's roaming through the town, and even the guys themselves were nervous about it, to where they both went together. Instead of alone and they both carried guns, and yet you're trying to say that a young girl thought, oh wow, I'll do a prank or joke, and out in that darkness with that rumor that everyone's afraid of, and this girl, alone, goes out there without a gun without a flashlight and actually hides in the. Woods with the idea of just giving these guys a scare. No way, Jose. No young girl in a cabin at night in the dark is gonna go outside alone without a weapon, and hide in the woods just for the sake of a joke. Sorry, don't buy it.
Two words. White people lol
Both girls went out together. They could've had flashlights but turned them before the boyfriends got there.
That grammar though…
It seems like you're disbelieving things just for the sake of disbelieving them... The premise of everything you wrote is "that would make these people dumb and that's impossible"... Everyone involved were being dumb. The guys for firing at something they couldn't see, despite no movement in their direction and the girls for thinking it was a good idea to prank their boyfriends in the middle of the night, when they'd both just bought guns and had taken them with them. Dumbness very much exists.
@VelkanAngels
Well, you're entirely wrong as to what I said and second of all it seems to me. You're a little bit off base. Just by view and my internal brain working because nothing. You said came out of my mouth so you've decided what I was thinking. The one thing you said that makes entirely good sense is the fact that they were all dumb.
Disbelieving things just for the sake of disbelieving. Really? That in itself makes no sense. No, the disbelieving by me was based on a concept put forth by the story. I still do not believe any young girl. Under the existing circumstances as described w. Have ever gone out there alone and hid in the dark if they believed the story of the panther.
There is a huge difference between being dumb and doing something that if you were truly petrified, you wouldn't do. It might also be dumb, but it's not the motivation. And the motivation is the fact that it wouldn't happen. You wouldn't reach the stage of dumber, not. Of course, the guys were dumb for shooting at a sound in the night. I didn't address it because I didn't need it to be addressed. Now, that would be dumb and that, I would believe even if it's far-fetched. But under no circumstances would I believe that this young lady would do what she did. And then of course is the fact that it's a story. No more, no less no proof no names. Know nothing. But to determine that I for some reawant to disbelieve something. So thus, I wrote all those words to justify the fact that I don't believe it when, in fact, each thing that I said that happened in the story was a repetition of what happened in the story. And what was so important for you to write such a thing about nothing. You couldn't let it go. You just had to straighten out that guy who wrote something that you don't believe that he believed it. Where in this case didn't believe it. I'.
M mostly amazed at the fact that you had anything to say because what you wrote entails your reading my mind and that's a big step.
Geschichten aus dem Paulanergarten 🙄
No, these are not stories from the Paulanergarten. All three stories are true, you can google the names and places in the video and easily find multiple news articles from various real sources. I'd link them, but my comment would probably get flagged for spam if I post a link. I'm a big skeptic when I watch Mr. Ballen, and he does sometimes source things from Reddit stories that are unverified, but these are not those.