Mechanics of Materials - 3D Combined loading example 1

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 41

  • @Dan_S_Z
    @Dan_S_Z 4 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    Why is no one saying how awesome this video is? Literally, this video is so well explained that it's insane

  • @riditasnim
    @riditasnim 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is the best video I’ve watched on combined loading and not to mention, I haven’t understood the right hand rule for YEARS because no one has ever explained it well to me, but this video cleared up all my confusion on everything. Everything I questioned that I didn’t even understand enough to question was explained so well! I wish I found this video sooner

  • @carrrlos1285
    @carrrlos1285 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    OMG... Thank you!!!! I was very confused with why the transverse shearing stress could be = to 0 sometimes and I spend hours trying to understand why and thanks to you I finally understand it, x1000 thanks, pls keep making videos, they're amazing!!!!

  • @hassankhalil9184
    @hassankhalil9184 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow i cant believe how simple you have made this for me, thank you very much really appraciate it.

  • @bora_yazilim
    @bora_yazilim 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you a lot for giving such a compact video, all in one concept. Our lecturer tried to teach this topic but it took his 2 hour to finish such kind a problem.

  • @hwasky98
    @hwasky98 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this really made it so much easier to understand seriously thank you !!

  • @nachoclown8969
    @nachoclown8969 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I hope you understand you have helped me and many other students before l because of this video, and I thank you for it.

  • @Mamdouh_
    @Mamdouh_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    very neat and well explained, thank you

  • @boranozdemir8200
    @boranozdemir8200 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    u re really lifesaver

  • @amitthakur257
    @amitthakur257 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Superb..simplified..clearing lot concepts..

  • @amatoallahouchen5894
    @amatoallahouchen5894 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing explanation thanks a million!

  • @goitzsquad8279
    @goitzsquad8279 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very well done and super helpful. Thanks!

  • @eddiemurphy4851
    @eddiemurphy4851 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing video, thank you

  • @zhengyangsong
    @zhengyangsong 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Many thanks!!!!!!!!!!

  • @AtliTobiasson
    @AtliTobiasson 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great explination, thanks

  • @williamfuentes6524
    @williamfuentes6524 ปีที่แล้ว

    hey, what app are you using? thanks for the video btw

  • @burakkaanozturk763
    @burakkaanozturk763 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It was great, thanks

  • @dingledanglson4010
    @dingledanglson4010 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really great video. I'm doing a lab on combined loading right now and I was wondering how you would calculate strain at point A in this problem if you have the modulus of elasticity?

  • @utilityzc2039
    @utilityzc2039 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In combined loading problem, are we considering a 2D square element on the surface of the member or a 3D cube stress element? I am getting confused on what the orientation of the element chosen is and how the stresses act on that element.

  • @EngMah.eldefey-jy9km
    @EngMah.eldefey-jy9km 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    great work 👍👍❤❤

  • @AM-xy8bg
    @AM-xy8bg ปีที่แล้ว

    why isn't the Fy force direction going the opposite direction considering that you got a - Fy in your calculation

  • @samkeloinnocent8316
    @samkeloinnocent8316 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    when using cross product I am getting +200 ; +300 ; +600, which is the best way of calculating the internal moments?

  • @SDCB754
    @SDCB754 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you! I have a quick question sir. The axial force that is perpendicular to the cut will cause a normal stress, and the other two axial forces will cause torsional and shear stresses. How do we differentiate which force will cause the torsional stress and which force will cause the shear stress?

    • @Daniela-it1fc
      @Daniela-it1fc ปีที่แล้ว

      if the force is an axial force, it will cause a normal stress. if the forces are parallel to the cross section (fx and fy) then they're shear forces that will cause a shear stress and a bending stress (using Mx and My) and if the moment (Mz) is longitudinal then it creates torsion

    • @SDCB754
      @SDCB754 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks, Daniela!@@Daniela-it1fc

  • @madelinemcgovern2069
    @madelinemcgovern2069 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    how do you know the force in the z direction is pointing that way?

  • @williamcase426
    @williamcase426 ปีที่แล้ว

    three forces and three moments are all you need bro

  • @jasonws1094
    @jasonws1094 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there no quantitative way of calculating the moments other than imagining it? i tried using cross product which is M= r xF but i always get the negative of what you get for moments.So i got -200000,-300000, and 600000. pls help

    • @engineeringdeciphered
      @engineeringdeciphered  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Remember that we are calculating the internal moments at the cut: they will be exactly opposite the external moments created by r x F. These are the internal moments at the cut that counteract (sum to zero) the external moments.

  • @Ijee12
    @Ijee12 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So basically are you saying there’s no normal force in this problem?
    Only shear forces?

    • @engineeringdeciphered
      @engineeringdeciphered  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      correct, there is no normal force because there are no forces in the z direction in this problem. There is normal stress, though, due to one of the moments.

    • @Ijee12
      @Ijee12 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@engineeringdeciphered oh okay.
      This topic really confuses me.
      Do you have other examples like this ?
      I really want to get a hold of it and master it.

    • @engineeringdeciphered
      @engineeringdeciphered  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The video before this is the explanation of 3D combined loading, and then there are two more examples after this one. You can these 5 videos in order on my mechanics of materials playlist

  • @shahidtv914
    @shahidtv914 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which book do you get the example?

  • @syarhanar-rawi9949
    @syarhanar-rawi9949 ปีที่แล้ว

    I thought the I of the circle supposed to be pi*d^4/64

    • @engineeringdeciphered
      @engineeringdeciphered  ปีที่แล้ว

      You can use your equation as well. That’s the same as pi*r^4/4 because r=d/2

  • @abdulsamedbilgen9872
    @abdulsamedbilgen9872 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    th-cam.com/video/vwqf54paRk4/w-d-xo.html part 2 guys

  • @user-uk1oq4to6b
    @user-uk1oq4to6b 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ims till struggling :(

  • @Josh-rd5dw
    @Josh-rd5dw 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    my god i hate physics