MQ-1 Predator Drone: The Eye in the Sky

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 922

  • @Jsh0w
    @Jsh0w 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1293

    Please consider the GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM. The GPS is one hell of a mega project.

    • @pokiparkassistent
      @pokiparkassistent 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Got an upvote just because you tried for a while now to get the video about gps

    • @LarsaXL
      @LarsaXL 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      It sure is, and unlike most of the videos, it will be about something we actually make use of.

    • @Antoine7881
      @Antoine7881 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes! A mega project for sure!

    • @Souchirouu
      @Souchirouu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Fun fact: Most of the GPS satellites used in Europa are part of China's BeiDou network.

    • @MikeThaiger
      @MikeThaiger 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not just the GPS but even the 2 other positioning systems that is up there too.

  • @tigersharkzh
    @tigersharkzh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +275

    8:20 The Rotax 914 isn't a Turboprop, it's a turbo charhed 4 stroke 4 cylinder engine. A turboprop engine is a turbine engine that drives an aircraft propeller.

    • @martinmatola688
      @martinmatola688 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I was about to write the same thing. 😅

    • @YardenJZ
      @YardenJZ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Came here to see if anyone has already caught that before I comment!

    • @richardmillhousenixon
      @richardmillhousenixon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      To be fair, it is a 4cyl turbo-prop engine, it's just not a turboprop engine...

    • @tigersharkzh
      @tigersharkzh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@richardmillhousenixon No, just drop the "prop" from your description. It soesn't matter if it has a - in it or not, it's just wrong and missleading. Trust me, I was a ground engineer for a major airline for 37 years.

    • @richardmillhousenixon
      @richardmillhousenixon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@tigersharkzh It is a 4 cylinder turbo(charged) propeller engine. It's not a turboprop because its not a turbine engine, but it is a turbocharged propeller engine meaning it is technically a turbo-prop, just not a literal turboprop

  • @marshallcarhart579
    @marshallcarhart579 3 ปีที่แล้ว +258

    You can’t just casually mention the MQ-9 and not make a video about it

    • @ybing
      @ybing 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      and the Avenger? lol

    • @terenceconnors9627
      @terenceconnors9627 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Especially as the Reaper has mounted the ARGUS-IS sensor since 2014. PBS's NOVA was permitted limited access to the ARGUS program back in 2013. The capabilities revealed were staggering in their implications. Imagine what the US government didn't want known. You could easily fit highly capable LiDAR in that mount, and I'd bet ground-penetrating radar is possible, too.

    • @sibire8284
      @sibire8284 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@terenceconnors9627 see this is why civilian owned surface to air missiles need to be commonplace

    • @terenceconnors9627
      @terenceconnors9627 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@sibire8284 I'd lay odds you'll be able to find plans online for one built using commercial off-the-shelf parts within 2 years, if something's not already available. The real challenge is stabilizing the electronics against the accelerations involved; some kind of non-conductive polymer similar to what's used in naval electronics might do the job. Rockets, sensors, motors, CPUs, you can purchase them all on-line. Explosives are a different issue, one that would probably have you talking with the FBI and BATF. Enjoy that discussion.

    • @kekistanimememan170
      @kekistanimememan170 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sibire8284 every site the us goverment could use for drone is known. The people could shut down all the runways in a month.

  • @toymachine2328
    @toymachine2328 3 ปีที่แล้ว +171

    Mega Projects idea: Simon Whistler's TH-cam channel collection

  • @aceman67
    @aceman67 3 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    The footage recorded by the drone at the Battle of Roberts Ridge was the first time a Medal of Honor action was captured on film.

    • @rorschach7507
      @rorschach7507 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      And here it's mistakenly called "Roberts Bridge"
      Plus i've read somewhere it's rumoured to being made into a movie, if that's correct then it should be awesome.

  • @Rollin8.0
    @Rollin8.0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    Mig pilot: "crap I nearly died, I'm going to get this sucker!"
    Predator pilot: "I just got shot down. Oh well, time for lunch"

    • @andrewdoesyt7787
      @andrewdoesyt7787 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      If a MiG pilot got shot down he wouldn’t be talking anymore 🤣

    • @harderdaddyowo2153
      @harderdaddyowo2153 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      More like, I just got shot down... Im going to hear it from my Commander tomorrow morning

  • @UAVChief
    @UAVChief 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Thank you! Having worked with UAS for the last 25 years, I was impressed with your presentation of its history and its capabilities. I would enjoy seeing you make a Sideprojects episode on the current fleet of UAS used by the US and other nations. It's important to note that while there is no one "in" these aircraft, there is always a person, or in most cases many people, controlling/monitoring it and the information it is sending back. This is hardly ever highlighted in most media.

    • @johnp139
      @johnp139 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It is more manpower intensive than any manned aircraft system. Especially when you consider that analysis that goes into all of the data collected.

    • @UAVChief
      @UAVChief 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@johnp139 - I totally agree! There a "human in the loop" every phase of the operation. Unfortunately, I've had many conversations with civilians and (sad to say) military folks that think these aircraft are operating as some kind of autonomous Transformer, making decisions and firing munitions on their own. I'm sure you will see comments in this thread that display that belief.

    • @voodoo148
      @voodoo148 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SlocketSeven to extent yeah, its probably true. There is always a possibility that the UAV can lose its satellite link to the ground control station, this starts a lost link procedure where it will be programed to go or fly a certain course. So its possible that it was programed to fly to this airport under no ones control.

    • @UAVChief
      @UAVChief 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@voodoo148 - I concur. Every UAS that I am aware of has some sort of emergency procedure like this for a "lost link" situation. It will usually loiter in a designated (safe) location to avoid interference with other aircraft and give the operators time to correct the problem and notify others (higher-ups, airfield, etc,...). An automated emergency recovery would occur typically when the aircraft's fuel level hits BINGO.

    • @voodoo148
      @voodoo148 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@UAVChief it depends if its been programed correctly www.independent.ie/irish-news/missing-chad-drone-may-have-tried-to-fly-home-26497563.html whoops!

  • @andrewslovak1
    @andrewslovak1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Just an FYI, a "4 cylinder turboprop" doesn't make any sense. It looks like the 914 Rotax is a traditional 4 stroke combustion engine. It is turbocharged but that's not quite the same thing as a turbo prop. A turbo prop uses a turbine to drive a compressor which mixes with fuel and ignites to drive, well, the tribune and a shaft connected to a propellor whereas this engine uses a turbocharger to compress air and mix with fuel in a cylinder.

    • @yayayayya4731
      @yayayayya4731 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes. I thought of the same thing too and wanted to comment it. But saw your comment and decided to like it instead.

    • @unclebob6728
      @unclebob6728 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      On You Tube, they don't let facts get in the way of a good story. I call It - Pseudo History and Pseudo Science. Thanks for the video Dr, Felton!

  • @scythefaraday5122
    @scythefaraday5122 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I know everyone is talking about the engine, but few are talking about the aircraft itself. During the video there are graphics of the MQ-1, but also of the MQ-1C Gray Eagle and the MQ-9 Reaper.

  • @hankw69
    @hankw69 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I remember when these were in the prototype stages at Edwards AFB. I worked in the electrical shop and we were tasked with servicing the long row of batteries. Each weighed around 83 lbs and could seriously damage your mid-section if lifted improperly. But they were a good, modern design and only needed minor servicing to function.

  • @D0P1C3
    @D0P1C3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    ThrustSSC first land vehicle to officially break the sound barrier Simon please

  • @mycroft16
    @mycroft16 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    On of my favorite aircraft. Whether it was in recon or combat mode this thing was terrifying. You never knew if one was around, and if it was, you were being watch, and potentially fired on. The MQ-9 is just awesome as well. The Global Hawk drone is another great one to cover and even sees use in Hurricane hunting with overflights.

  • @jb76489
    @jb76489 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    9:05 fun fact, the hellfire is so accurate there is a variant, AGM-114R9X, that doesn’t have a warhead but rather blades that pop out before impact turning the missile into a giant, rocket propelled slap chop

    • @ethanilsley9496
      @ethanilsley9496 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This was just recently used to kill the current…. (Well not current anymore) leader of the taliban.

    • @odstclose2962
      @odstclose2962 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Naughty dictators get the aerial slap chop

  • @hiddenhood483
    @hiddenhood483 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I get chills almost every outtro they are just too good

  • @Midnight-Marauder
    @Midnight-Marauder 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    It was actually called Roberts Ridge...

    • @anguskeenan4932
      @anguskeenan4932 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yeah my bad, must have accidentally hit the B key haha

    • @danimal341
      @danimal341 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah was going to comment this. Great book as well.

    • @xram2010
      @xram2010 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad I wasn't the only one questioning that

  • @robertgarrett5009
    @robertgarrett5009 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A Rotax is a two stroke engine used mainly in ski-doo water and snow craft, made in Canada. the version your probably thinking of is a turbo charged version. Not a turboprop. These Engines are well known for their reliability and fuel efficiency.

  • @ThisHandleIsNotAvailableYall
    @ThisHandleIsNotAvailableYall 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    12:41 Those A-10s are ones formerly operated by the 188th Wing, current operators of MQ-9 Reapers. Cool coincidence.

  • @ludgatecircus15
    @ludgatecircus15 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Simon - you are my go to man on the internet. I just wanted to thank you for your hard work, in particular for expanding your coverage to new channels. Well done.

  • @joeyr7294
    @joeyr7294 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    14:00 very true Simon, think about it when buying a desktop or laptop...by the time it hits the shelf to be sold a newer version is being produced in the factory!

  • @VegasFlyboy
    @VegasFlyboy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Worked these for a couple years down range. Genuinely cool little aircraft.

  • @Discounthomelander
    @Discounthomelander 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Do an update! Cover the MQ-9 Reaper next!

  • @InSidious1805
    @InSidious1805 3 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    Mega projects suggestion: Shell Refinery in Baytown, Texas or any other large chemical refinery. The infrastructure is massive with many miles of pipes.

    • @fsxflyer253
      @fsxflyer253 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Oil refineries in general are absolutely fascinating.

    • @kaiyack
      @kaiyack 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hovensa in st croix was pretty massive too

  • @NorrlandPow
    @NorrlandPow 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Love your show! I think you meant "The battle of Roberts ridge", in wich the USAF combat controller John A. Chapman was posthumously awarded the medal of honor.

    • @detectiverohan
      @detectiverohan 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wasn't he awarded TWO medals of honor? Or am I wrong?

    • @MaceTrek
      @MaceTrek 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@detectiverohan No, just the one, and it took a HELL of a lot of work to get him that one, including reviewing the footage from the Predator that was overhead at the time. The Navy Seal who abandoned him on the ridge was given a MOH a few years earlier, for tactically abandoning TSgt Chapman on the field of battle. Chapman survived long enough to destroy a machine gun nest, and fight until his last breath, preventing the Taliban fighters from engaging his team's helicopter. He's the first Airmen to be awarded a MOH during the Afghan war/GWOT.

    • @rorschach7507
      @rorschach7507 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MaceTrek given a MOH for leaving a man behind? How does that work? Doesn't sound right to me.

    • @MaceTrek
      @MaceTrek 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rorschach7507 It's a pretty crazy story, the US Navy/Seal Community fought Chapman's award of the MOH, believing it would damage their reputation, alot of people believe that Slabinski should have stayed behind to recover TSgt Chapman's (still living) body, but that he retreated in an unbecoming way, and they navy covered that up by submitting him for an MOH himself. The book Alone At Dawn by Dan Schilling and Lori Chapman Longfritz goes into some of this, though, it could be considered slightly biased (Lori Longfritz was TSgt Chapman's sister).

  • @GlenHunt
    @GlenHunt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I love the blurry Ryan Air logo. On par with their execution of business.

  • @ChopperBruce
    @ChopperBruce 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Please consider the Distant Early Warming (DEW) Line. This was an early warning system that required the construction and supply of 63 installations well inside of the Arctic circle

  • @spyersecol0013
    @spyersecol0013 3 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    I am seeing a piston engine and you are saying turbo-prop Then you show a turbine engine. Since I am a (retired) Airframe and Powerplant technician (airplane mechanic) I know the difference between the 3 types you mentioned. I hate to say this but you got it wrong.

    • @dougaltolan3017
      @dougaltolan3017 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      "A 4 cylinder turbo-prop" got my attention, you said it much better though.

    • @AAaa-pm3rr
      @AAaa-pm3rr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Editing...

    • @Jack-hg1hq
      @Jack-hg1hq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      yep and they got the power of the trent wrong too

    • @punxnotdead185
      @punxnotdead185 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same thing I was just about to say but you already said it lol.

    • @WarblesOnALot
      @WarblesOnALot 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      G'day,
      SighMann is a mindless Talking Head, who unblinkingly unthinkingly unhesitatingly says whatever his pet tame Scribe "Danny"writes for him.
      Danny should have to write out 1,000 times ;
      "Turbo-CHARGED Does NOT Equal Turbo-Prop...!"
      They also neglected to mention the brand new Predator which flew off from Abdurdistan to Iran and landed at an Air Force Base, while defecting to a Team of Radio & Computer Experts from China.
      The Proletariat must nyet be peturbedski, y'see...!
      Such is Life
      Happy Solstice Festival.
      ;-p
      Ciao !
      Such is Life

  • @RAS_Squints
    @RAS_Squints 3 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    Simon 'Small Band of nerds'
    Business Blaze Homer: 'NEERDS!'

  • @user-cx2bk6pm2f
    @user-cx2bk6pm2f 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Simon has truly found his calling... to research and report. Only the called can make it look so easy and smooth.

  • @wiryantirta
    @wiryantirta 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    13:02 can you imagine what would’ve happened if the predator’s stinger actually hit the Mig25.
    “hahaha rc-plane launched manpad missile go brrrrrr”

  • @steverambo1648
    @steverambo1648 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I got to meet Mr Karem once and was personal friends with 2 others from the Leading Systems team. Awesome piece of tech

  • @limewoof
    @limewoof 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hey Simon, so the 914 Rotax is a piston engine (how ever it is turbo charged). A turboprop is a turbine (jet engine) driven propeller which uses a gearbox between the two

  • @tomclark6271
    @tomclark6271 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    BTW, the configuration of this UAV is not an inverted Y tail, it's an inverted V tail. Less drag than other designs.

  • @dwchen1
    @dwchen1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Simon, you explaining the size, weight, and height of the MQ-1 Predator with graphic of MQ-9 Reaper which is much larger in size.

  • @hellopinkham
    @hellopinkham 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Jeremy S is onto something.. a deep dive into the technology and the origins of GPS would be a fitting subject for, this; or one of the hundreds of other channels like, "Side projects" or "Today I found out". Thank you and thanks to your team for the great content.

  • @6973chris2
    @6973chris2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What about the MQ-9 MQ-20 RQ-4 and so on? I'd love to see videos on those aircraft

  • @TheTarrMan
    @TheTarrMan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I remember being a kid in the mid 90s reading about those in a magazine called "Popular Science".

  • @StinkPickle4000
    @StinkPickle4000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Great Vids guys I've been watching lots but this is first time I have ever found something worthy of commenting on...
    Correction: the rotax 914 is not a "turbo-prop" engine, it is at most a turbocharged piston engine, huge difference. The Rotax is like a snowmobile engine with turbo, a "turbo-prop" is pretty exotic/rare for most people and more closely related to the turbo jet engine you showed.

    • @GleichUmDieEcke
      @GleichUmDieEcke 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Actually came here to say the same. I don't usually comment, but that one grated on me.

    • @nhwilkinosn
      @nhwilkinosn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah... The rotax isn't a turbo prop. Hell, he even showed the cylinders 🤣

    • @Esser44
      @Esser44 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Came here to say the same. It was actually a highly modified 914 with an aftermarket high altitude turbo that was positioned on the top of the engine instead of the bottom. It was also fitted with an aftermarket fuel injection system. The engines were converted by Rotech in Vernon British Columbia

    • @StinkPickle4000
      @StinkPickle4000 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Esser44 Thanks for the extra info, that's really cool... I've been to Vernon lol

  • @grrjr215
    @grrjr215 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Since you mentioned Chinooks in this video, a megaproject video on a helicopter that has been in use since the late 50s I believe qualifies. Granted I'm biased since I worked on them for 20 years.

  • @Viper-dn8ix
    @Viper-dn8ix 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hey Simon!
    You should do a video on Denver International Airport.
    It's the largest airport in the world (King Fahd doesn't count...), fifth busiest in the USA, and the 15th busiest in the WORLD!)
    The airport has its share of conspiracy theories, gorgeous architecture, and plenty of budget overruns! It's truly a spectacular place that is deserving of a mega projects video.

  • @Ihasanart
    @Ihasanart 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Simon, you should do a side-projects episode on the AGM-114R9X. Related to the MQ-1's development lineage its a AGM-114 Hellfire II missile variant thats designed as a no-collateral missile, it has no warhead, but instead has 5 popout sword-like blades to turn its target into salsa.

    • @gdheib0430
      @gdheib0430 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      pffft...salsa would be envious of the fine material those blades create ;)

    • @Logic44
      @Logic44 ปีที่แล้ว

      The aftermath of the cars look metal as fuck, you can literally see where the blades cut through the car roof...

  • @ScootrRichards
    @ScootrRichards 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My father worked on rc drones during WW2 used to train navy gunners to shoot down kamikazes. Yes, they would fly the drones right into the ships. Usually the gunners got them first.

  • @jonathanwhistler9081
    @jonathanwhistler9081 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    First of all nice to meet another Whistler not many of us out there, second enjoyed this video considering i have been apart of this program since 2007. This is definitely a more accurate than others, keep up the videos.

  • @KkevrockK
    @KkevrockK 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why wouldn’t I let Simon fill my ear holes even more. Although I’m familiar with most of the topics you cover, the colour and enthusiasm you add to their stories is always worth the refresh. And as a suggestion maybe you want to look at confederation bridge in Canada as a future project?

  • @jonasbardinoandersen9639
    @jonasbardinoandersen9639 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Simon the engine you mentioned is not a turboprop engine. it is just a normal piston engine.
    The Rotax 914 is a turbo-charged, four-stroke, four-cylinder, horizontally opposed aircraft engine

  • @Dr.RichardBanks
    @Dr.RichardBanks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    While working EOR in HOA I waved at an MQ-1 in 2010, its camera system waved back 😅 good times.

  • @rickym5474
    @rickym5474 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Manapouri dam would make an awesome Mega Project.

  • @leviburki8722
    @leviburki8722 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Please consider: SpaceX‘s Starship or the first landing orbital rocket booster, Falcon 9 or Falcon Heavy

  • @michaelpipkin9942
    @michaelpipkin9942 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thank you so much for focusing on planes.
    It's fantastic.

  • @henryv.3272
    @henryv.3272 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    At you 7:45 mark you have your images mixed up. The upward facing rear flight control surfaces (they refer to them as rudder-vaders) are for the Predator B (MQ-9), and not the Predator A (MQ-1).

  • @idontrembe1
    @idontrembe1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I always thought that the MQ-1 should be named Basilisk. Because if it looks at you, you are pretty much screwed!
    Great Video BTW.

  • @timesathousand
    @timesathousand 3 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    Please Consider: Henry Ford's first assembly line factory.

    • @GeorgeEstregan828
      @GeorgeEstregan828 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      No

    • @kaiyack
      @kaiyack 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The rouge plant is mega too. Vertically integrated steel mill and autoplant. Mmmmmm.

    • @christopherallen1138
      @christopherallen1138 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah the Rouge plant would also be good

  • @montithered4741
    @montithered4741 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    7:47 is an image of an MQ-9 Reaper; which has vertical V tail rather than inverted ^ tail and uses a turboprop engine, not a piston engine.

  • @thedevilinthecircuit1414
    @thedevilinthecircuit1414 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The MQ1 has an inverted V tail. The MQ9 has a V-shaped tail. They are two *quite* different aircraft.

  • @skyden24195
    @skyden24195 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I live near a USAF Reserves training base, and I regularly see the drone being flown for training and testing purposes. It's fun to see it flying. It is also odd; because of the design you might not expect the drone to sound like a very quiet Cessna. :-)

  • @gatling216
    @gatling216 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    What's not often realized is that the Predator and its descendants have probably saved more lives than any other modern battlefield advancement. Being able to precisely locate and target an enemy position, then engage it with smart munitions, exponentially reduces the risk to everyone involved in the operation except for the target on the receiving end. When you're operating in urban environments, every missed shot means dead civilians. A single, well placed missile can easily destroy a hostile target, without doing anything more than rattling the windows of the neighboring building.

    • @metatron6066
      @metatron6066 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Funny how they still manage to murder so many children with them still 🤔

    • @intello8953
      @intello8953 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is this the type of drone that during Obamas years killed so many innocent people?

  • @alanhelton
    @alanhelton 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    I flew the Army version, the Warrior... Great but heavy times.

    • @pranjalsharma479
      @pranjalsharma479 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whats the NVH like 😂
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      jk man

    • @top6ear
      @top6ear 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      When I was in Afghanistan a soldier let me use the remote viewer for the camera, the tablet sized piece with microwave transceiver

    • @joeyr7294
      @joeyr7294 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      🇺🇲👍 thanks for your service 🍻

    • @Livi_Noelle
      @Livi_Noelle 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I was in Huachuca while they were testing the Israeli drones way back in '96. The Army gave me the option of becoming a drone pilot. I opted to be 96R1P instead.

    • @corylabove6851
      @corylabove6851 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      RIP Warrior-A. 😭

  • @rubiconnn
    @rubiconnn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    10:53 "They identified a man who matched his height, wore long white robes, and had a beard".
    Yes, there can only be one tall guy with white robes and a beard in the middle east. It must be Bin Laden.

    • @marc0523
      @marc0523 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Seeing as Bin Laden was shot years later... I wonder who it was?

    • @James.576
      @James.576 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      "Probably Bin Laden" 😂

  • @caphenning
    @caphenning 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Rotax 914 is not a turboprop, it is a 115hp turbocharged reciprocating (piston) engine.

  • @ignitionfrn2223
    @ignitionfrn2223 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    1:05 - Chapter 1 - Early iterations
    4:00 - Chapter 2 - Abraham karem
    7:30 - Chapter 3 - Design
    10:10 - Chapter 4 - Service
    13:25 - Chapter 5 - Retirement

  • @ozone5100
    @ozone5100 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Having been deployed during the War in Bosnia, I got to see the Predator up close. Working beside the runway and seeing this strange aircraft was un-nerving. No pilot. Non standard design. Sounded like a nest of hornets. The ones I saw were the un-armed ones. That was one of the most memorable deployments for me. Also got to watch Mig-21's launch and recover too

  • @Swelackattack
    @Swelackattack 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hey Simon, loving the amount of content you're putting out! Small point: 4 cylinder and turboprop are terms that cannot be used to describe the same engine due to fundamental differences in how they operate.

  • @supertyfon1736
    @supertyfon1736 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Rotax 914 is a 1.2 liter flat 4 piston engine the MQ-9 is powered by a Garret now Honeywell TPE-331-10 Turboprop.

  • @gwentchamp8720
    @gwentchamp8720 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    At 12:15, the Battle of Takur Ghar was known as the "Battle of Roberts Ridge" not "Bridge" as was incorrectly stated in this video.
    Also incorrect at 11:58, this video states that the F-22 Raptor was involved in that battle. However the battle took place in 2002, and the 1st recorded combat mission of the F-22 was in 2014 in Syria.
    Also incorrect at 7:54, the video shows an image of an MQ-9 Reaper instead of the MQ-1 Predator -they are not the same.
    Simon, you need to get your facts correct !!

    • @quokka7555
      @quokka7555 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They also wrote “Libia”, as opposed to, Libya*

    • @gwentchamp8720
      @gwentchamp8720 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@quokka7555 Just sloppy in IMO. I think Simon is just churning these out too fast w/o doing enough research.

  • @tensevo
    @tensevo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ideas for megaprojects:
    National Grid, Jodrell Bank, The M1 Motorway, London Sewers, Any major aircraft or jet engine, Millennium dome, Any major bridge or tunnel,

  • @ziragorn
    @ziragorn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Do a video on the KC-135! Almost as old as the buff and a rich history

  • @k2477-o3n
    @k2477-o3n 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Battle of Roberts Bridge either took place in a year other than 2002 or it didn’t include F-22s. The Raptor didn’t enter service until 2006!

  • @joshuamiller5017
    @joshuamiller5017 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Do a follow up on the MQ-9 (Predator B)
    I love your videos and the effort put into these, however one single inaccurate thing that I feel needs to be pointed out is the MQ-1 didn’t have a turbo prop engine. It had a conventional piston engine, it was depicted correctly but spoken to incorrectly.
    I know you strive for the best so maybe you can fix it 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @whitepony8443
    @whitepony8443 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are the best, Simon.

  • @xiro6
    @xiro6 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    8:17 its not a turboprop,its powered by a 4 piston engine.

  • @joshknight2696
    @joshknight2696 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    FYI the Rita’s 914 is not a Turboprop engine. It’s a 4 cylinder reciprocating light aircraft engine 😊

  • @MichaelRacer
    @MichaelRacer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Since you did an episode on the MQ-1 Predator, are you gonna do one on the MQ-9 Reaper?

  • @sackerproguy
    @sackerproguy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ace! Well presented!

  • @oscarmuffin4322
    @oscarmuffin4322 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    The Rotax 914 isn't a "turboprop" engine.
    It's a turbocharged engine.
    A turboprop is a turbine engine with a propeller attached.
    The fact that you said it has 4 cylinders instantly disqualifies it from being a turboprop.

    • @palethorpe01
      @palethorpe01 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can I put one in my GoKart?

    • @MisterAndrewBuckley
      @MisterAndrewBuckley 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@palethorpe01 yes but it'll never fly 😁

    • @palethorpe01
      @palethorpe01 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MisterAndrewBuckley well that depends on how hard I hit the kerbs...

  • @aggibson74
    @aggibson74 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video...but, the Rotax 914 is not a turbo prop engine. It is a turbo charged piston engine. 8:17

  • @johnp139
    @johnp139 3 ปีที่แล้ว +108

    500 miles away from the operators, more like 5,000+ miles away.

    • @thefunkosaurus
      @thefunkosaurus 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Reminds me of a song....
      th-cam.com/video/QDFTHiJR63U/w-d-xo.html

    • @oldenweery7510
      @oldenweery7510 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Yeah, I wondered about that myself, but I'm 80 and subject to doubting my memory. I thought I recalled that the Predators in the war zones were controlled from here in the US. Thanks. Stay safe. Happy Holidays!

    • @Markle2k
      @Markle2k 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      That's the 12-hour loiter combat radius. They can be controlled from anywhere with a satellite connection. This script seems like it was edited down from a much longer original by someone with no contact with the original author and little knowledge of the subject.

    • @henryv.3272
      @henryv.3272 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Markle2k I know a little about these aircraft and know that they can stay in the air for a long time. There is a phrase that is used about these aircraft which is "you can run if you want to, you will just die tired" Meaning they can follow a target for longer than you can stay awake to give you an idea of how long these can operate.
      The MQ-9ER (Extended Range) has external fuel tanks and larger wings that greatly extend its time in the air.
      What this video missed is how many versions there are, and how many different countries now have these aircraft.
      Also to be very clear these are permitted to fly over US airspace without an escort (another plane) since they lack a sense and avoid capability. Basically they don't have radar and don't know what is around them at all so they can fly into a tree, a mountain, a building or another plane.

    • @Markle2k
      @Markle2k 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@henryv.3272 There are other drones and the MQ-9 has been exported, but the USAF has put the MQ-1 into unrecoverable storage. None were exported. They stripped them of their avionics, and, of course, the mobile control units were designed to be able to be used with future drones.

  • @Nexfero
    @Nexfero 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love this drone!

  • @theangelbelow88
    @theangelbelow88 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This thing is literally the precursor to the Hunterkiller drone from the Terminator franchise

  • @agent_meister477
    @agent_meister477 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love how Simon DRONES on about these things 😋

  • @cuddlepaws4423
    @cuddlepaws4423 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    It was inevitable that drones would become part of the military. How long have people been using model aircraft? I'm kind of surprised it didn't happen sooner.

  • @dougduchateau443
    @dougduchateau443 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'd love the see you discuss ITER and/or the R101

  • @Raul_Menendez
    @Raul_Menendez 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    One of the few weapons systems that changed warfare as we know it.

  • @pierdelecto2612
    @pierdelecto2612 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can't wait to have mine. I just traded my Skydio2+ and DJI mavic 2 for this.

  • @johnp139
    @johnp139 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    4 cylinder turboprop engine? I didn’t know that turbine engines use cylinders/pistons.

    • @sadams12345678
      @sadams12345678 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He probably meant "turbocharged" Engine

  • @thepelicancase1062
    @thepelicancase1062 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Please consider the stratospheric observatory for your next in flight project, it would more certainly be a megaproject.

  • @i0ntempest
    @i0ntempest 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    8:41 "4 cylinder turboprop"??? You probably mean turbo charged piston driven prop

  • @codidevlugt2153
    @codidevlugt2153 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I would love a video on the A-10 Warthog. A plane with a gun so big they built the plane around the gun.

  • @TheWatz05
    @TheWatz05 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Having worked on flight lines and watched normal craft taxi watching and barely hearing this craft taxing was creepy.

  • @zv7ws
    @zv7ws 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Geez Simon, how many more channels are you going to start? xD Not complaining though. I enjoy most of them. Good luck on all of your endeavours.

    • @sandybarnes887
      @sandybarnes887 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Business Blaze
      Mega Projects
      Side Projects
      Top Tenz
      Today I Found Out
      Biographics
      Geographics
      Highlight History
      Xplrd
      Visual Politik EN
      The Simon Whistler Show
      I may have missed one.
      Visual Politk EN is now hosted by someone else. The Simon Whistler Show hasn't had new content for a while.

  • @russellmarcoux4916
    @russellmarcoux4916 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Sorry but that Rotax 914 engine is "not" a turbo prop engine. It is a piston internal combustion engine.

  • @beijingkoala4
    @beijingkoala4 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The MQ-1 engine is correctly stated as a Rotax 914 but it is incorrectly stated as a 'turbo prop' engine.
    The 914 is a turbo charged piston (4 cylinders internal combustion) engine, it is hugely different to a turbo prop engine!

  • @blurglide
    @blurglide 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The Rotax 914 is a piston engine, not a turboprop. A Rolls Royce Trent 900 produces 70k pounds of thrust. If it were doing so at 500 mph, that'd be over 90,000 horsepower, not 12,000

  • @mnsquatch1900
    @mnsquatch1900 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Robert's Ridge, named after Navy SEAL Neil C. Roberts(M.O.H.), and not to be picky, but the battle of Takur Ghar happened in March 2002. The F-22 did not even enter service until 2005 I believe.

    • @joboring8397
      @joboring8397 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was looking for this comment. This is what I thought but who knows what is actually true ever

  • @hathaway3979
    @hathaway3979 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The F-22 raptor was not in service until December 2005. i think you misinterpreted the a-10 and the f-22 for f-16 and f-15e which were used in the battle of Battle of Roberts Ridge.

  • @guilhermevitorio273
    @guilhermevitorio273 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is really convenient, drones were announced for war thunder recently and I wanted to learn more about them!

  • @beachboy0505
    @beachboy0505 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Funny thing.
    So many countries successfully took inspiration from this drone and made their own versions and used in recent conflicts.

  • @vectors2final36
    @vectors2final36 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Rotax 914 is not a turboprop. It is a turbocharged piston engine. A turboprop is a turbine engine...its more like a jet engine, which are also turbines.

  • @fvckyoutubescensorshipandt2718
    @fvckyoutubescensorshipandt2718 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Still waiting on the Bingham Canyon Mine. Also still waiting for the world's biggest man-made landslide to half fill that in in a few seconds as well.

  • @DaFinkingOrk
    @DaFinkingOrk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Suggestion: KH-1 (I won't say it's codename since it's too relevant to 2020 lol). Or "Keyhole" optical recon satellite series in general.
    Suggestion: James Webb Space Telescope.
    Sorry if you have already done any of these.

  • @harlyquin
    @harlyquin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    9:08 just wondering, is there a down side to using the "Y" tail?, if so i fail to understand why the propeller is so important to save in a crash and thats even if the inverted Y shape would even save the propeller in a crash, is the propeller worth more than the rest of the plane and what if it crash lands over the ocean? saving the propeller from breaking would be pointless if it sinks to the bottom of the ocean, maybe a tracking device has been installed onto the propeller for just such an incident, this leaves me to wonder would the propeller be worth the cost and risk to human life tho im guessing submergible drones could be utilized for a deep sea propeller recovery mission, but would the propellers on the submergible drone or drones also need or use a "Y" shaped tail to prevent damage in a crash under water?

    • @alanbrickey2617
      @alanbrickey2617 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      With the prop at the rear, it's real easy to have a prop strike on take off. I don't know if you noticed the tail configuration on the newer MQ-9, it has a "Y" arrangement that is right side up. It uses the vertical stabilizer mounted on the bottom of the plane to help prevent a prop ground strike.

    • @harlyquin
      @harlyquin 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alanbrickey2617 yep, i know, i said what i said because he said "crash"

    • @discovolante6624
      @discovolante6624 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alanbrickey2617 um, im pretty sure harlyquin was making a joke

    • @ivicamilosavljevic4706
      @ivicamilosavljevic4706 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It Is "inverted V tail" or "A tail", that can be udes instead of ailerons, to make rolls, yaw, turns etc. With only few servo motors and mixed commands...

    • @harlyquin
      @harlyquin 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ivicamilosavljevic4706 whats the down side to using a v tail?

  • @HeroesDie12
    @HeroesDie12 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am very biased for Army stuff. I would love a video on the M1 Abrams from start to recent next-gen upgrades. M1!!!