MiG-29: The Soviet Answer to the F-16
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 มิ.ย. 2024
- Get Surfshark VPN at Surfshark.deals/mega and enter promo code MEGA for 85% off and 3 extra months for free!
Simon's Social Media:
Twitter: / simonwhistler
Instagram: / simonwhistler
This video is #sponsored by Surfshark.
Simon's Other Channels:
TodayIFoundOut: / todayifoundout
TopTenz: / toptenznet
Biographics: / @biographics
Visual Politik: / @visualpolitiken
Highlight History: / @highlighthistory
Geographics: / @geographicstravel
Business Blaze: / @brainblaze6526
"It's a shame that the F-16 and the MiG-29 never fought each other." Vladimir Putin: "Hold my vodka."
Biden; "Holding the vodka and the F-16's, now what?".
The polish air force simulated a dogfight, they have both planes. There's a video of that on TH-cam
@@TRATTORE1225 mig couldn't compete 😂. The f16s nuts
@@TRATTORE1225 a dogfight requires the Mig-29 to close from 160km AMRAAM range to 5km
Good luck
@@hypersonichobo4263 AMRAAM has no sustainer-engine, if you do some manoeuvres after it is shot it is quite likely it does not have enough energy to still reach you... Especially at max distance...
And you also have not that many tries...
But still F-16 is much better than MIG-29...
"Protect yourself online with a Mig-"
Love to. Threat of a strafing run would probably improve my ISP's customer service.
"Im having buffering issues."
"Thats not our problem."
"Its going to be your problem."
@@barneymiller7894
"That's not our problem."
"Look outside, what do you see?"
"What's that shadow in the skies?"
"That's my brother. Now it is your problem. What should I tell him?"
Laughes in Bbbbrrrrrttttt
I giggled when he said that. :)
"My internet is down again. Don't make me get my mig"
In May/June of 1990 we saw the Mig-29 and SU-27 fly at the Will Rogers Airport in OKC.
We were told by the announcer that we were among the first "Westerners" to see them fly.
First was the Mig-29, it was incredibly agile and did maneuvers that seemed to rely on pure Engine power it seemed, doing Cork-screw turns on its tail as it climbed at times with one Engine turned off.
The SU-27 looked a bit like a giant F-15. It was the most impressive of the two planes. It did every maneuver the Mig did, but did seem like a more refined aircraft. The Mig's engines smoked.
Both planes did the Cobra right in front of us which was very impressive. Finally the Pilots landed and got out and waved to the crowd. Beautiful aircraft. Both were painted in sky blue and light grey as I remember.
For what it's worth I thought I'd put that out there.
This is absolutely fascinating, thank you for sharing.
Smoke is execes fuel injection, it colls down combustion cases and reduces nitric oxides and prolongs engine life.
In air combat mode (flick of swich) its smoke free.
Look up of German experience, they were beter than F16 in close combat, off bore helment mounted sight.
They were in service in Germany up to 2000s
Love the Frankenstrat, EVH forever!
@@ljubomirculibrk4097 didn't know that the 29 had that "smokeless" switch. Cool! Because smoking engines is being said as a tactical disadvantage during dogfights because it makes the plane more visible and shows its trajectory. Thanks!
I hope everyone who is interested in the MiG-29 has read about the joint air training of german MiG-29s against US F-16s in the US and the results. :)
OKC represent
A Mig-29 can take-off from the same grass strip on a cow field that I learned to fly from with a 1947 85hp Aeronca 7DC Champ. That says a lot about a front-line fighter in 2022.
Significant tactical advantage
yea lol
I'm a bit amazed that you forgot the German Mig-29, that German inherited after the reunification. They were used extensively in training exercises with the US, so that pilots could train against a real Mig. Those exercises also showed some of the advantages the Mig had over the F-16 f that time, in close combat the Mig was almost unbeatable while the US planes had a clear advantage at beyond visual range. "Military Aviation History" has a great video about that.
The MiG was unbeatable in close combat because it had the R-73 combined with the helmet mounted sight. In terms of manoeuvrability, the MiG-29 is good, but no match for the F-16.
@@JohnGaltAustria True, this is the reason why the west now also has helmet sights
@Christopher Huxley While your point is techincally correct, DCS pilots are not a factor here. Luftwaffe fulcrum pilots from JG73 had an exchange with VFA-106 in 2000, where the germans realized the inferior ergonomics compared to the NATO-spec aircraft.
Not really true. German and american summarized the test with saying that the MIG-29 is a piece of crap. I don't know were the idea about how the MIG was unbeatable in a turning fight is coming from? The only thing positive about the MIG-29 (from the test results ) was that the close range AAMs (slaved to the helmet mounted sight) was almost invicible. That is why so much resources was put into a new gen AAM, like the AIM-9x, Meteor etc. The MIG-29 does NOT dominate the skys in a turning battle. It is very limited.
@@JohnGaltAustria You are absolutly right. People tend to misinterpret the test result (most likely becouse they never read them...). The Close range AAM slaved to the HMS was groundbreaking. Nothing else was.
The MIG-29 was not designed as an air superiority fighter, it was a tactical fighter, an interceptor that would fly close to the battle lines, the SU-27 was an air superiority fighter.
Su27 also know an su 30mk,su 34 or T 50
And now j15
So...your sister Su Sow's???... (Si)
So what is the reasoning behind cobra maneuver on a non superiority fighter?
Also, you lose so much energy on the maneuver you would be shot down by a handgun!
The Su-27 went into service a few years after the Mig-29, but they are both multirole and air superiority fighters. Su-30s and Su-35s are doing air to ground missions in Syria, bombing hospitals. New York TImes has some good videos about it on youtube.
One of the Mig-29’s designers was asked about its lack of range, he joked that it was “a fighter designed to protect the boundaries of its own airfield”
Loads of things wrong with this, so many it's difficult where to start the criticisms. Here's a few to begin with: The Mig was a point-defence fighter not an air-superiority fighter, the F-15 entered service in 1975. The Mig 29's original load was 4 tonnes, upped to 6 in later versions (you can find this info everywhere). Nothing is mentioned of the plane's helmet mounted sight & the capability of the R73 in close combat which caused a great deal concern in the west during the early 90s. The Mig's "party piece" was the tail-slide not the Cobra - that honour went to the SU 27. The '29 does not have FBW nor RSS, so although capable of performing a kind of Cobra manoeuvre, it's can only do it fleetingly & not to the same extreme angle that the Sukhoi can achieve. Having said that, a 1950's vintage Saab Draken can achieve the Cobra manoeuvre, & this does not possess a particularly high T/W nor fancy flight control avionics: the Cobra is all about aerodynamics & a "soft" stall-point. Another moot point is you're comparing late model F-16 figures to standard A series Mig 29s. During the cold-war, the F-16 was fitted with the less-powerful & fuel efficient PW F-100 engine & was a far-less capable machine. I suggest you spend more time researching your videos rather than honing your chit-chatty delivery.
Roasted
I seriously doubt the the “chit-chatty” man is the one doing the research.
Can’t be mad at him. He’s basically an actor reading a script.
Good on you for the corrections though. 👍
Do you know my dad?
He also got it wrong that it was Poland and Bulgaria that purchased MIG-29s. Romania (also part of NATO) has some aswell.
@@yopappy6599 he's the face of the channel which means its his credibility on the line.
No excuses.
There's actually one air force that, to this day, uses BOTH the MiG-29 and the F-16. Poland.
Going back in time and showing someone in the 1980s a picture of a MiG-29 and F-16 flying side-by side in the same livery would be pretty surreal.
Not unless they know their recent history , in WW 2 US & Russia were “ allies “ where they flew side by side on multiple occasions , also the Soviets bought and used US made equipment such as airplanes , tanks , transport jeeps and rifles
In 2003 22 MiG-29s were sold to the Polish Air Force for a symbolic *1 EUR per Fulcrum*, 14 were taken into service with the 41. elt after an overhauled. Of the remaining two German MiGs, one had crashed after a pilot’s fault, and one (the 29+03) is on display at Laage-Rostock airport. (migflug.com/jetflights/german-luftwaffe-mig-29-fulcrum/)
Poland is throwing the mig 29 away as it now has f35
Soon there's gonna be Bulgaria too cause they ordered some F-16s
@@aabb-zz9uw Poland doesn't hae F-35 yet. 32 have been ordered but still haven't been delivered.
Additional point worth noting, the MIG29 has vents in the top of the wing that allow it to draw air from above the wings for the engines, this enables it to take off from dusty runways and adds to the deployment options.
their effect is negligible at best. Don't drink the RT kool-aid
The so-called "gills".
2:10 - Chapter 1 - Background
5:05 - Chapter 2 - Export
6:25 - Mid roll ads
8:05 - Chapter 3 - The aircraft itself
13:00 - Chapter 4 - Armaments
13:40 - Chapter 5 - The americans MiG29s
14:35 - Chapter 6 - Operational history
17:00 - Chapter 7 - Mikoyan 1.44, the failed successor
19:05 - Chapter 8 - The dogfight of the imagination
Thank you
Something that’s super cool is that the Swedish jet fighter j-35 draken (dragon) from 1955 could also perform a cobra, but instead of using thrust vectoring it used a wing with control surfaces, and no extra pure control surface like a canard wing
Nothing Swedish is cool
Sorry bro
@@chrispekel5709 Everyone is entitled to their own opinion
@@chrispekel5709 Hard disagree. Archer, CV-90, NLAW, Gripen… For a country with only 10.42 million people they make a lot of impressive military tech. Glad to have them on our side (once Erdogan gets his head out of his ass😅). 🇳🇱🇸🇪💪
Denmark had Draken too. Popular among pilots, and a whole lot safer than our Starfighters. The Starfighters had this howl though, cool sound. The Cobra did not impress danish Draken pilots either.
Neither the mig 29 nor the su27 had thrust vectoring either
Germany also used the Mig 29's that they inherited from East Germany after rejoining.
This would have been VASTLY better if he talked to any of the Viper dudes that got to fly the Fulcrum on exchange tours.
There's literally a video on TH-cam of US Hornet's vs German MiG 29's that they inherited from East Germany when they United. Sigh
It"s the downgraded version
@@bosbanon3452 And the Vipers back then were Block 30s. What was your point?
and they sold it for one dollar each :D
Simon speaks about MiG-29 supermaneurability, the entire time it's Su-27 or Su-30 video demonstrating it. Hillarious
yeah but for non aviation enthusiast it can be hard to tell the difference between the sukhoi's and the mig's at a glance. i can understand it
And it also means the Mig29 lives on in these other designs! It's so pretty!
He said in the video around the cobra maneuver that it was a copyright thing. They are fairly similar looking airframes though
@@craigmoran893 they were all developed in parallel by two different bureaus with little exchange of information. Mig-29 is also known to perform Kolokol, but not Cobra until recently. While Su's perform Chakra which is even more impressing
Yeah, I also thought that he is talking about SU30's famous Cobra maneuver
No. The 29 is a pure point defense fighter, meaning it would fight off tactical ground attack aircraft and their escorts, presumably the longer range F-15, in vicinity of tactical targets. Thus the 29 is the answer to that.
The F-16 was conceived a cheap air defense fighter for allied nations in Europe. It would replace the F-104 and the underpowered F-5, and it did. The 29 stayed true to it’s role, while the F-16 became wildly successful as a true multi-role platform.
Being multi role or not is not a extremely good point, even more when you have one of the best bombers and ground attackers
@@St.Matthew422 The F-16 isn’t as good of a fighter as the 29, but it does much more. To small nations this is important.
I would agree, mr crafts are more economical for smaller nations, especially ones where developing an af cadre!
Amen on the point defense issue. The rest can be debated, which i ain't going to :D
@@Britva83 the only time f16s met mig29s were during the kosovowar 1999.
The dutch F16 won
How the heck do we still not have a video on the Su-27 and all of it variants?!?!?
Love the video, but thrust is measured in “lbf” meaning “pounds of force” as opposed to pounds of mass like when weighing oneself. “Pound feet” refers to torque, and is written “lbft”. Easy to misread, but something to clarify for the future
Haha Yes well said
Thank you or that clarification - I did wonder when he said it. I was like "but pound feet is torque so how does that translate??"
Yeah, I'm dumb. It's correct in the script.
COME ON SIMON. YOU HAVE ONE JOB.
Megaprojects you’re not dumb Simon, you were just distracted ;)
@Eddie Hitler You have an example? Pound feet is torque. It is force multiplied by the distance away from the centre of axis. The definition of torque. (btw... it's not lb/ft because that would be pounds per foot, which is wrong. It's "Lbft" (without the slash) because it's force multiplied by distance) the way you write it, it's the opposite (force divided by distance). In short - no; you're wrong
0:28 - I'll take the 29 over shurfshark
Haha 😂😂
Love your comment
Would love to hear of the Mig 35.
Competing against F-35 and the two canceled European designs. Also a question if those things will all be outdated by remote controlled drones unconstrained by the need to keep the pilot alive.
@@johndododoe1411
fighter jet drones would be scary as fuck .
With the pilot controlling it safely from a cozy base , the drones would be able to maneuver, reach speeds and withstand g forces piloted aircraft couldn't even dream of
@@constantinethecataphract5949 replace 'drone' with 'missile' and you have modern air warfare lol
The F-16 wasn't initially designed to be a multi-role fighter, but gradually evolved into one over time.
Aren't you talking about the F-15 instead?
Simon every time you uttered the word the 'Cobra Manoeuvre' you have managed to show an Su-30 doing that never a Mig 29
And there are actually plenty of Videos of an Mig-29 doing them. Especially from the Mig-29 you can fly on if you have the money for it xD
that is so true your right .it was done to test the g force on the whole structure during testing .i have a book on it just is case you can look it up on the net and the test pilot call
ed it that
Plenty of planes can do the maneuver, originally it was even called the “Dracen Super-Stall”, most Su-27 variants can do it, and so can the MiG-29.
Can someone who is more knowledgeable about dog fighting please tell me what the tactical advantage of a cobra maneuver would be? My understanding is that bleeding velo is a death sentence but I don't fly planes or anything so I should probably solicit advice from keyboard pilots
@@JusticeDutton I did my undergrad in Aerospace engineering so have some idea about it... it is used to suddenly reduce the aircraft speed to virtually zero while in a dog fight. In theory it can help the adversary aircraft overshoot and then the prey becomes the hunter . Also it could help to misguid the adversary radar which now ll think a ' stationary ' object as a clutter or noise ( again theoretically). With the advent of new generation of IR seeking missiles and BVRAAMs the use of such a maneuver in an actual fight is unlikely to provide any real benefit. However its jaw dropping good if you watch it live in an airshow
Whoa whoa whoa now, Simon, my dude
@11:00
A: The Cobra Maneuver was made famous by he Sukhoi Su-27 when it was first performed for the public at the 1989 Paris Airshow. The Mig-29 really isn't known for the maneuver.
B: That footage you show of the Cobra? Is of an Su-33/37, not a Mig-29
Could do a whole aviation channel for all those planes,
hmmm....
LOLs, ur right. I didn't clock that first time around but now I see ur comment I skipped to the time-sig & ur right about the Su-33/37. Well-spotted, dude.
MFW seeing this comment.
th-cam.com/video/hou0lU8WMgo/w-d-xo.html
Correct. Not sure why this channel cannot discern SU-27 from MiG 29, but whatever. Different airplanes.
@@StsFiveOneLima To be fair, in grainy ass old airshow footage from the 90's their silhouettes are kinda similar
You make great videos and provide mostly accurate information. Some of the videos of the “mig 29s” you showed doing the the wild maneuvers were actually SU-27 flankers.
To be fair, it's just demonstrating supermanoeuvrability. It doesn't really matter which plane it's showing.
And he said he cant find any that are not copyrighted
Mig-29's speciality is flawless high altitude (low density atmosphere) operation .
"You can protect yourself online with a MiG-29"... even Simon's promotional comments are entertaining!
Honestly that sounds better though. If your tech savvy enough to find IP addresses and someone hacks you, you can find them and drop a KAB-500 on their house!
Why was it removed yesterday? And could you do one on the F14 Tomcat as this is the TOP GUN beast you mentioned in your video
Lol. That was the first thing that came to my mind as well.
Yes please!
It was mentioned in his twitter why he removed it: twitter.com/SimonWhistler/status/1290307338641973248?s=20
@@Asianxiety Thank you for linking :)
The f14 kinda sucks tho....
Great video as always. If you're after ideas for other aircraft, I'd love to see one on the Su-47 "Berkut". Another fascinating project that fell victim to budget cuts and (apparently) issues with its forward swept wing design.
Нет, просто управляемый вектор тяги открыл новые перспективы для самолетов с крылом нормальной стреловидности. Но Беркут дал ооочень много материала для дальнейшего развития аэродинамики и восприятия нагрузок. И да, Беркут достоин отдельной истории. Ну а для меня Беркут - бессменный аватар уже лет 10))
Yeah, an unfortunate side-effect of the forward-swept wing is it's tendency to undergo significantly more wing-loading at transonic speeds compared to a regular aft-swept wing. This would mean that the wing could potentially fail catastrophically at much lower speeds during high-G (or high angle of attack) maneuvers. Based on these limitations it was decided that further development would be discontinued. The lessons learned about super-maneuverability were valuable though.
Thank you for doing a video about this aircraft, I was waiting for it:)
India: How many MiG-29 should we order?
Indian Government: Order 66
What?
@@vivekkaushik9508 StarWars Reference. Order 66
Nice one lol
"I'm not sure that's a practical amount..."
"Dew it."
hi M B...
'
what reason india want 66 ussr russia mig-29s for...
name of country want to war anti india
Well now you have to do the Soviet Hind helicopter. A attack chopper that could carry 8 troops as well.
We used to call it an airborne tank.
A truly magnificent thing. I have had a privilege to sit in a cockpit of one.
@@ts14a269 It is an airborne tank 🤣
rarely did the helicopter ever carry troops inside of it. most of the time the cargo bay was used to store extra ammo and fuel, and on rare occasions a crew chief would man a pk on the door windows
Even more incredible: Marat Tischenko, head of the Mil design bureau, visited Soviet Hind squadrons in the Afghan front lines in the 1980s. The pilots put on an air show, even pulling off barrel rolls. He was astounded as he thought it was impossible. Tischenko said of the Mi-24, "I thought I knew what my helicopters could do, now I'm not so sure!"
0:10: Gen. Radek’s MIGs in Air Force One:
Are we a joke to you?
I absolutely enjoyed your video, however, please allow my humble correction; the imperial unit lbf, used to rate the impulse force of jet engines stands for Pound Force, not Pound Foot. Pound Foot (lb.ft) is the imperial unit for torque, commonly used to rate the rotating force output of a piston engine or electric motor’s shaft. This unit is also not to be confused with Foot Pound, ft.lb, which is the imperial unit for work or energy, used to rate the impact energy of a moving object, as a bullet for example. This is a lot less confusing in the Metric system.
If you want to buy an aircraft that can go over Mach 2, the demilitarized MIG-29 is the cheapest one you can buy - Even to this day!
Cheap on purchase, but it failed per hour cost and is failing even as a Mig-35, painting new emblems and pasting new stickers will not solve its problems, unless if it decides to auger into the dirt as 50% of the mig-29 ever built have done.
Not true you can still buy a MIG-21-BIS second hand. Mach 2.05 at 13,000 meters.
@@gordonlawrence1448
I don't think the Mig-21 is in production anymore though ? Which makes spare parts an iffy proposition.
@@Grumpy_old_Boot It's not quite like that for military jets. EG the typhoon production lines were still open for 5 years after the plane stopped being made just too build up a stock of spares. There are a lot of spares that have never been out of the box for the MIC-21 and of course hundreds in "boneyard". There were nearly 12,000 of them made. Spares will not be an issue for a long time yet.
@@gordonlawrence1448
That's true.
I still think the MiG-29 will edge it on buying price (especially in the second hand market), and since it's still in production, spare parts is even less of a hassle.
But yes, you are correct, the MiG-21 is indeed a very attractive jet plane as well, if you want to go Mach 2+
Of course, both are essentially toys for the super wealthy, if you want an affordable jet, the civilian jet planes beat them in both price and running costs - But I don't think any of them can go Mach 2+ ... though I could be wrong.
The MIG 29 was never intended for the "air superiority" role, it was originally designed to be a multi role fighter capable of both ground attack and air to air operations and In that regard the Mig 29 and its successor the mig 35 have fulfilled the multi role fighter job beautifully, the su 27 and its successor the su 35 are the only russian fighters currently in service intended exclusively for the Air superiority role (even though they still can carry out ground attack operations but to a limited extent ), the su 27 was the soviet union's answer to the American F-15 eagle, the soviet union found itself unable to defend against this new aircraft because at the time they didn't possess an air superiority fighter capable of countering the American threat so that's they designed the Su 27.
And the F16 was an answer to the Mig23. The Americans got worried about the Soviet numbers advantage, so they decided to build a cheap fighter.
@@scratchy996 And the F-16 (Block 70/72) has now become an expensive plane as well. Funny how that works.
@@scratchy996 No the F-16 was an answer to the high cost of the F-15. It had nothing to do with Soviet fighters of any type.
@@dumdumbinks274 That's very much possible. I'm just saying what I saw on a documentary about the F-16.
@@scratchy996 Fair enough, though modern documentaries are not entirely reliable. You should look into the development of the F-16 starting with John Boyd and the Fighter Mafia, but don't take their ideas on what a fighter should be as fact... it was 50 years ago and a lot has changed/
I always thought the F-18 was similar. Seen together at 89 Abbotsford Airshow they looked really similar.
Sorry for the necro, but in many ways the MiG-29 is a closer analogue to the F-18 (or rather the YF-17) than to the F-16.
16:08 this video aged in a weird way
Surprised no one mentioned the two MIG-29 "features" that western bloc aircrafts don't have:
1. A flap in the main engine intake drops down during takeoff in muddy fields. This was a requirement because they couldn't rely on well built airports (or airstrips). Air is sucked from vents located above the main engine intake in that situation.
2. Laser range finder and targeting for the canon. The Soviets claimed it was deadly accurately and helped them reduce the need to carry more ammo. Pilots who used the ones acquired from East Germany said it didn't work well in real life.
Thanks for the info on the laser targeter / rangefinder. I always wondered how well it work in real life.
Soviet aircraft need this feature because after the main runways have been cratered by NATO aircraft they will now need to use the debris strewn taxiways and such. Western aircraft have less to worry about this happening.
@@johnknapp952 let´s wait and see !
MiG 29 also has helmet- mounted sight, which the F 16 doesn't have.
@@deltacharlieromeo8252 Yes it does. It's called the HMCS or HMDS or something like that. Even gets a special AIM-9X super agile off boresight missile to use with it.
Oh good its back
13:37 is a picture of a mig 29 outside of the air museum in Oregon at The Evergreen Aviation And Space Museum In McMinnville it's a really amazing place and I highly suggest visiting if you're near there it also houses the Spruce goose which is way bigger than you could think
Physics: *Exist*
Mig-29: We don't do that here
Suggestion: The Arecibo Observatory radio telescope in Puerto Rico
Trick ooh, good one
You mean Rogue Transmission?
@@SomePeopleCallMe I think the radio telescope in Battlefield 4 is set in China and is based on the real, extremely large, telescope referred to as "FAST," which is located in China's Guizhou Province. A MegaProject video comparing the two, along with how they may have influenced the game, would be a great suggestion.
You mean Alec Trevelyan's last stand?
Yeah, good idea champ
Back when Germany still had a few Mig29 there were regular combat simulations with other NATO nations and from what I've read the US pilots were always very impressed of the Mig's capabilities.
Yep. The German Air Force/Luftwaffe acquired quite a few MiG 29’s from East Germany when the wall fell. I was a Combat Medic with a Patriot Missile battalion in Germany from ‘95-‘98, during that time we did a NATO TACEVAL (we were evaluated in combat operations by the Germans, Brits, and pretty much everyone who has either had their asses kicked or saved by us). When we had the actual eval after 6 straight months of train up, one of the aggressor aircraft was a MiG 29 (along with some Hinds, and other Soviet aircraft). Considering the fact that I originally joined the Army in early 1989 when the Cold War was still in full swing, and we were trained in basic training about fighting the Soviets and Soviet doctrine, I definitely made the hairs on the back of my neck stand up to look up and see an actual, real deal MiG 29 “strafing” us. First time I ever saw one, although I had seen real Mi-24 Hind D’s at Ft Bliss during Roving Sands in ‘92 right after we came back from the Gulf.
Stefan Misch
were they impressed with the mig's or with proper pilots using mig's? even if avionics differences between NATO and USSR planes are huge, as we are even more away each day
Yea I listened to an interview with a british test pilote who flew one after the fall of the eastern block. It was apparebtöy very easy to fly. Alot of automatic controle for the engine.
When I seen the MiG-29 "Fulcrum" up close, it surprised me... It is MUCH smaller than I originally thought it was. At Evergreen Aviation Museum, (in McMinville, Oregon, that they show in this video with the MiG in front of the large glass front triangular building) they have a good number of aircraft (Including aircraft from the "Spruce Goose" to the B-52 "Stratofortress"). When comparing the F-4 "Phantom" to the MiG-21 "Fishbed", the Phantom is much bigger. When I compared the Fishbed to the Fulcrum, the Fishbed was bigger in a number of areas. Surprising al' right...
IMHO, the two most graceful-looking fighters ever are the F-16 and the Mig-29. Aviation Art. Russian engines: Engineer: "How much power do you want?" Pilots: "Yes".
3:34 the F-15 was a response to the MiG-25. or at least what the US thought the MiG-25 was going to be, which it turned out not to be at all.
Ironically enough it ended up being a pretty good response to the Mig-29 and Mig-35 though
@@todo9633 a respond to the future lmao
@@todo9633 Mig-35 is still not in service with any operator, including Russia, so this makes ZERO sense.
@@2005OEFArmy ehh, he probably meant the SU-27.
Nato couldn't get any good intelligence on the Mig-25, all they knew was it was big and it was fast. They didn't realize that the Foxbat couldn't maneuver, and was only designed to be a fast, high-flying, bomber interceptor. The Eagle was developed in 72 and it wasn't until 76 that the US was able to obtain a Foxbat from a defector, which was after the F-15 was put into service. So the F-15 would have been built to respond to what they speculated about the Mig-25 was capable of, luckily for nato, it wasn't that great.
The Mig-29 also scared the Americans who were under the impression that the Fulcrum had a really advanced radar as well as its other characteristics like the helmet-mounted display and the ability to fire high-off-boresight IR missiles. Once the Soviet Union collapsed and the German reunification the Germans inherited Mig-29s which they flew as adversaries for Nato pilots in exercises. Turns out that it had a fairly mediocre radar and the high-off-boresight fox-2 capability wasn't as horrifying as it sounded (they were afraid that they might not have any ability to compete in a dogfight but they were wrong) Which obviously the US has since developed their own helmet-mounted displays.
Did he almost say "You can protect yourself online with a MIG-29" during the promo at the start? xD
Sure, you can try to hack his computer, but there's a Russian fighter jet screaming towards your house at a couple of machs if you do.
IDF did that during the beginning of may 2019. A cyber attack was launched out of Gaza and was traced back to a specific building in Gaza. So the IDF bombed the building and destroyed the computers
;D
LOLs
I hate myself for this already but.....couple of mach* ...yup taste like bile
Hell yeah! I will buy a MiG-29 for that purpose!
Now where is the ad code for buying?
9 G's is pretty standard. 9 G is close to the limit of fighter pilots. Very dangerous for the pilot to lose consciousness while flying. Unmanned UAVs could out outmaneuver manned fighters. Some later models have more fuel tanks along the spine. ( conformal ? ). Lovely plane. A really beautiful change for Soviet fighters. Best since the Mig-15. Can still be dangerous. To the enemy.
You always post great content and this video was no exception.
how about the F-14 Tomcat from the actual movie Top Gun, it had it's issues but computer-controlled delta wing! Still used by Iran, although rarely
All of those issue were worked out by the time they introduced the F-14B.
And is also utilized by SDF1.
It IS and I will NOT HEAR OTHERWISE! 😉🔫
@@seanbrazell6147 The what?
@@OrdinaryDude Robotech dude, Robotech - Marcross Saga.
@@viperswhip Uh, ok...
Side-note:
At 5:57 of the video there's an image of four F-16 fighter jets in formation over water. I spied, with my little eye, a building on the shoreline that appears just above the blue tail of the lead plane. That building is the "Monona Terrace", a Frank Lloyd Wright-designed building in Madison, Wisconsin, USA...some 150 miles from where I live. Wright never saw the building, construction having begun 34 years after his passing...and opening in 1997, some 59 years after it was first proposed.
The occasion for the photograph was the 60th anniversary of the Wisconsin Air National Guard. 115th fighter wing, in 2007-8 and the 10th anniversary of the opening of Monona Terrace. Following the street directly behind the Monona Terrace, away from the lake, will have you at our lovely State Capitol (just out of frame) in two city blocks.
On Wisconsin!
im from baraboo myself.when i was younger,i used to see them fly over rhythm and booms at warner park,it was the highlight for me seeing them pass over just above the trees
On the invitation to suggest other aircraft, I recommend de Havilland's DH-82 Tiger Moth. Thousands and thousands built. Practically every commonwealth fighter and bomber pilot (and many Americans too) received WW2 elementary flight training in them.
But any video on any aircraft is something I'll eventually watch. This was a good one on the Mig 29. Thanks.
Mig-29 is one of my favorite jets in Ace Combat.
More jets would be great - F35, A10 warthog, AC-130 "spooky" gunship, etc
A10 first please 😃
Spooky isnt a jet but hells yeah i get ur point
I think he already has an episode of the A10
Shark
I think that was Real Engineering that did one recently.
@@negativeindustrial oops, sorru
Let’s get a video on The Hubble Space Telescope 🔭
the official story or the real one that the hubble was never meant to look away from earth that it was originally designed for the cia and was surplus this perfectly explains why it didnt function properly and needed to be altered as the lens that it was launched with was designed for viewing closer objects
@@paktahn And show that the earth was flat. Finally.
@@megaprojects9649 I think what they're trying to say is that it was built on a surplus spy satellite chassis (which IIRC it was, though heavily modified); though I don't think the focus issues have to do with poor conversion into a telescope [I'm pretty sure there wasn't anything left of the 'original' optics in it], I always heard it was a problem with calibration of the (new) computerised measuring equipment used by the company producing the telescope optics -- luckily when debugging the issue after the fact they could figure out exactly by what factor the calibration was off and produce a corrective lens to compensate, and at the time the Shuttle could do a mission to install it. Fun stuff to learn about, I'd also like to see a video on it!
@@megaprojects9649 We have been over this for years now! The earth isn't round... Nor is it flat, that would be just silly.
No the Earth is a CUBE!
@@CMDRSweeper Resting on cubic turtles, all the way down.
I swear to God I clicked the link for "Bathyscaphe Triest: The Quest to Actually Dive 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea" but some how ended up on the MIG-29 video... TH-cam is a fickle mistress.
yet we love it
I liked the video's juxtaposition of the Mig-29 and F-16. Would like to see a video comparing the M1-A1 and T-80. Or perhaps just focus on the M1-A1 or maybe the Chobham armor it got from the UK Challenger tank. Love your videos!
Please do MiG-31, the fastest aircraft flying today (and the Soviets' answer to Blackbird).
Yes do on mig-31
If he is going to do the Mig-31 he should just do a double feature of the Mig-25 and Mig-31 seeing as the 31 only really exists to fill the gap that the aging Mig 25 left.
@Ruturaj Shiralkar lol, sure mate, sure
@Ruturaj Shiralkar It isn't like the government that developed the majority of those planes collapsed or anything.......
@Ruturaj Shiralkar yep
I would says the Mig-29 was to counter the f-15 rather than f-16
Nah, the MiG-25 was. The Soviets learned that we were developing a supersonic fighter that could deliver nukes and needed something that could do the same.
What about Su-27?
@@duncanmcgee13 MiG-25 was developed as a response to SR-71 and XB-70 projects as a super fast interceptor. MiG-29 was supposed to be cheap frontline fighter, with the Su-27 being true air superiority fighter like the F-15.
Isn't there a new air superiority us fighter?
Nah guys. The Mig-25 came first, then the F-15 countered that, then they created the high-low and the F-16 was made, then the Russians realizing that the high-low thing works, built the Su-27 and Mig-29 to counter the F-15 and F-16 respectively.
The Cobra maneuver, yeah. It is good for air shows and movies but not much else.
I’m always up to watching a mega projects video on any military jet, especially fighters. So yes to all of them. The checkmate would be a good place to start with on the Russian end. An in depth episode on stealth in general would be nice. Sukhoi makes a few interesting examples.keep up the good work Simon.
Raising of the Kursk would be a fantastic Mega Project.
th-cam.com/video/uQJ6IMREvz8/w-d-xo.html
19:52 is a Sukhoi, the Mig29 doesn't have a tail-boom
Even the curvature is not there in Mig
@Caп¡s Aпuв¡s As well as their size the 29 is really smol
The Mig-29 is an underrate fighter jet quite capable of holding its own; in fact, when it entered service in 1982 it was superior to the F-16 until the 'C' generation of the F-16 was developed. The US did not come to fully appreciate the Mig-29's potential until after the re-unification of Germany when German pilots, from the former West Germany, started flying it and discovered its abilities. Many US pilots flew against it in mock fights only to be shot-down during these exercises by the Mig-29s flown by the German pilots. Germany only began flying it after the re-unification due to inheriting them from former East Germany and deciding to fly them just to see what they could do. The Mig-29 earned the respect of those pilots who have flown it.
Only superior due to it's air to air weapons. In terms of maneuverability the F-16 was better, and the F-16 also had longer range, better situational awareness, a lower IR signature, and was smaller. The MiG-29 was faster, but that doesn't matter at low altitude where most predicted WWIII battles would occur, or in a dogfight.
The West German, English, American, French etc pilots found that the MiG-29 was lacking in terms of maneuverability compared to the F-16 and Mirage, while being slightly more maneuverable than the F-15. In guns-only battles it lost more often than it won, even when facing F/A-18s. This was in part because the early MiG-29s had no FBW controls and were much more difficult to fly than anything the West had. And once the West developed their own HMD + IR missile systems by the early 2000s the MiG-29 had no notable advantages.
The MiG-29 earned the respect of pilots not because of it's performance, but because it was fun to fly a decently maneuverable fighter that had no computer-enforced restrictions. One German pilot in particular noted that it felt very much like flying an F-4 in terms of cockpit ergonomics and technology.
Nice video. Thank you very much. Yes I would like to see a video on the MIG 35. As well as the SU-27 and SU-35.
The cobra maneouver was first performed by the su-27 (shown in the video) and not the mig-29.
The first one was the J35 Draken
Actually, it was the Swedes who performed it first - though for some reason the Russians got more fame for it
@@JosePineda-cy6om probably because of the Russian jet which were the first to be able to make complex
maneuvers
@@JosePineda-cy6om The Cobra was complexed its years before Russia did it and Sweden don`t tend to Brag
@@Karl-Benny That's one big problem of Scandinavians (I'm including Finns here, though I know the "Scandinavian" title kinda not completely applies to them) in general and Swedes in particular: you guys are WAY TOO POLITE AND WAY TOO HUMBLE!!! So much so that sometimes you yourselves forget what your country is about (really SAS? Nothing is really Swedish?). Sweden is an awesome country. For your own good, you should brag a bit more
Why am I watching this? I don't even own a fighter jet.
Good point I never even thought of that.
Myself included
Like, we do??🙄
@@Ari-cd3sn you haven't got yours yet? I'd contact your local representative forthwith!
@@ollieb9875 😂😂
Well yeah me either so I gotta watch all these vids to decide!
Ghost of Kiev, reality or myth doesnt matter, go get them!!!
Is that F-16 video still in the works? Might I suggest the A-10 Warthog as a subject?
An Air Force buddy once told me a joke about an airframe discussion between 2 ordinance sergeants:
F-16 Ordie: We've got 9 hardpoints that can carry air to air missiles, air to ground missiles, smart bombs, recon pods, gun pods, rocket pods, and ECM pods... what can your hardpoints carry?
A-10 Ordie: F-16s.
I'd like to see more videos like this, I mean the raptor and su-37 or su-47 and so on. Mig-35 sounds like a fun video too! Also, does Russia have some stealth bombers like the B-2?
Not officially, but they most likely have analyzed the F-117 nighthawk that was shot down in Serbia and maybe in China right now.
Yes to a mig-35 video please.
@Против Глобал everything you claim could be true then again it could also be propaganda used by your country to garner more support for the war from its people
Против Глобал the us acknowledged they were shot down. That’s basic information, nothing was covered up
I think the closes they got to a stealth bomber was the Tu160, but there are rumors of a new generation stealth bomber project in the works called PAK DA.
The mig-29 is an interceptor that can dogfight if needed, when it came out it had several advantages over the f-16, helmet-mounted sight, r-73, and medium-range missiles. It heavily depended on ground control to point it in the right direction and turn its radar just before shooting the target. Pilots didn't even have a battleground picture in a display like the su-27, instead, it just has a HUD repeater. It was demonstrated to pilots before Mikoyan even finished the manual and more advanced features, like fly-by-wire were to be implemented later but then the soviet union ended. The Mig was stuck with the same old tech for a while. The f-16 on the other hand kept getting upgrades and ended up being one of the most popular multifunctional jets ever with superior avionics.
@Vulcan Logix ______
"but the soviet plane was far- far more Maintenance friendly"
It wasn't so much more maintenance friendly as that the Soviets (and later Russians) had no where near the safety margins and maintenance requirements for their aircraft that most western Air Forces have. Likely, given no maintenance whatsoever and most things being equal, a MiG-29 will lawn dart into the earth due to maintenance issues long before an F-16. It's just that the United States Air Force has the money to spend on maintenance and thus spends it to make sure that doesn't happen.
"as well as far more fuel efficient"
I would be absolutely shocked if the MiG-29's RD-33 engines were more fuel efficient. Especially since the F-16 has had multiple engine upgrades over the years. Even so, the original Pratt & Whitney F100 which has since been upgraded was probably a much more efficient engine. If the Indian and former East Germany MiG-29s have taught us anything, it's that the Soviets/Russians weren't nearly as good at making engines as the west. Even now with the Su-30MKIs that the Indians are primarily using, the engines are much more fragile than western counterparts. The Indian Air Force has to be super duper careful about foreign object debris being sucked into the engine and when something does happen to the engine it has to be shipped back to Russia for an overhaul/repair.
@Vulcan Logix ______
"Going to flexible afterburners the Soviets were thinking of Maintenance downtime whereas the Rapter requires 20,000 hours of maintenance after every flight"
Only a fool would compare a late 1970s fighter to a 5th gen stealth aircraft fighter in the first place. If you knew anything, you'd know that the stealth aircraft in the American fleet need extensive maintenance due to their RAM coatings. The B-2 even has a *_CLIMATE CONTROLLED HANGAR_* to safeguard it when it's parked. Try again.
"Whereas vector nozzles require maintenance due to temperature affecting the hydraulics of the engine's."
Truly a fool, you can't even tell the difference between variable exhaust nozzles (which the MiG-29 has, just as with most modern military jet aircraft with afterburner-capable engines) and thrust vectoring.
And, again - *_I was comparing the MiG-29 to the F-16. Why the hell are you bringing in stealth fighters and thrust vectoring?_*
"Fuel efficiency is becoming equal to the west only after latest power thrust engine design overhaul."
Nah.
"And dont forget the Soviets have latest cockpit ejection technology"
The Soviets have the latest technology when they haven't existed for 30 years? ...Okay.
"also radar upgrades"
...You're kidding yourself if you think Russian avionics and AESA radar are on the same level as the west, specifically America. America has been developing AESA radar for longer. And they've been doing a better job of it.
If you knew anything (you don't), you'd at least have been wise enough to cite Russian IRST systems where they did/maybe do have an advantage over America and the west on. But you didn't. Because you're a fool.
"The su-29 stands alone and has been in service for a longer time than the F-15."
The Su-29? The single engine propeller trainer from the 1990s? ...Okay. You're high.
"And even before it. American planes have always been behind soviet planes as far as quality but soviet planes have certainly been around much longer due to their build."
Yep. You've definitely been inhaling paint fumes or something.
@Vulcan Logix ______ It is like an ak47, not a sniper rifle I guess. Still deadly.
@Vulcan Logix ______
"I am still laughing about it because the SU - 29 was actually developed to counter the F - 14 Tomcat"
...AGAIN, the Su-29 is a single-engine propeller acrobatic/trainer aircraft developed in the 1990s. You can't even get the designation correct, FFS.
@@matchesburn Actually,Japan is the first country to use AESA radar on their fighter jet.Russia is way behind in AESA tech,their SU-35 is still using PESA radar(which used to be a big thing when most of the western countries still stuck at pulse-doppler radar) and only a handful of Mig-29K,Mig-35 and SU-57 have those AESA radar.Even Chinese already have AESA installed on their newer fighter jets when the Russians still stuck at PESA
Hi Simon, this just came through my feed in 2022. While I do have a few quibbles with some of the info here, it was VERY well done! FWIW, the people over at Sukhoi were quite displeased with the comparison of the MiG-29 and the Su-27 (a larger and more capable aircraft with an almost identical appearance). The Sukhoi folks claimed the MiG was a copy of their design! As far as the comparison between the American F-16 and the MiG, I note that during the current Russian invasion of Ukraine, various NATO nations have been providing war material to Ukraine. I will specifically mention Poland. Equipped with a number of MiG-29s, the Poles offered to lend/give their fighters to Ukraine (which used the same aircraft), as long as the USA would "backfill" the Polish Air Force with F-16s. Having direct experience with both types, I find it significant that the Poles were willing (anxious?) to replace their MiGs with the American-built competition.
Great video, mate! Will subscribe right now. FYI Romania, an important member of NATO, had 20 MiG-29s (9.12A) plus two UB's (two seaters) and operated them from 1989 til 2003. You may also want to check out the MiG-29 Sniper, what almost became the most advanced export upgrade but it never came to be. Cheers and keep up the great work!
The Indian Air Force used the MiG 29 in the 1999 conflict with Pakistan, flying jets in combat sorties at altitudes above 25,000 ft on craggy mountains.
Not a single MiG 29 was lost to enemy fire!
Because MIg29 never crossed the LOC to the Pakistani side.
@@anwarma1 Pak airforce chief surrendered after knowing Mig29 heading towards Pak, destroyed military bases. Pak airforce chief was afraid to bring F16 to fight mig29.
samrat julius dowerah that’s was then during kargill. It didn’t surrender dude . PAF during kargill didn’t have BVR hence was venerable . But now they have the BVR punch and many other things in store. On February 27, 2019 , PAF showed what it can do to IAF, you lost an SU30 and MIG21 . After denying loosing an SU30 why India is replacing that SU30 in the 12 aircraft order. 11 IAF SU 30 have been been lost in different training sorties but the 12th was lost on Feb 27, 2019. Cheers
@@anwarma1 haha a su30? really. It's you who lost an F-16 to a meager Mig-21 lol. Your airforce, just like your surrender army, doesn't know how to fly, you are only good bombing your Taliban on Durand line.
@@anwarma1 Also why didn't your airforce intercepted those Su30s and Mirage when they were bombing your terrorists in your territory? Cause you were too dumb and too late, and too afraid.
Protect yourself online with a Mig LMAO this joke is gold
F-16 were fighting the MiG-29s over Serbia as well. Most of them were destroyed during the initial cruise missile strikes on hangars but some of them went on suicide missions against NATO squadrons. Fun fact, one Serb pilot basically stole a MiG and sacrificed himself to distract an incoming NATO squadron and buy more time for his base to evac, he went 1 against 16 NATO fighter jets in a defective MiG29 (malfunctioning radar, no missiles onboard) and actually got them to flee for a few minutes (due to a sheer WTF moment that NATO pilots were experiencing) before AWACS realized that he was alone and they took him out with an AMRAAM. Its a cool story, the pilots name was Milenko Pavlovic.
I never heard about this story. If it's true: hats off and respect to this Serbian pilot
G'day Simon. An episode of Impossible Engineering recently shown on Australian telly featured the modular British Antarctic base. There was a segment featuring the M-18 Hellcat and its radical gearbox innovation. The program claimed the Hellcat was a famous WW2 tank destroyer - but I'd never heard of it. I checked it out online and it looks like something you'd have a ball with on Megaprojects.
Simon: 'there are scarier places out there'
Me: 'Business Blaze?'
Love the content as always
BB is a silly place
Im still waiting on Charles to take over, and crown himself "Charles the 1st, King of the Machines."
@@rucker69 but that's why we love it right?
@@Texassince1836 Charles the 1st, Heater of the Blaze, teller of conspiracies and King of the machines
Great video! Just one correction, the Cobra maneuver shown is done by a Sukhoi Su-30 and not Mig-29
14:27 - McMinnville Oregon - neat museum where you can see the Spruce Goose as well as a pretty extensive collection of Soviet fighter jets.
Great video Simon. I would like to hear about the F-14 Tomcat and the MIG-25 Foxbat. If you haven't done the F-4 Phantom, that would be a good one. It's lack of a gun in the design was a glaring failure in the Air Force's lack of understanding of how future battles would be fought, which I believe continues to this day. As far as the F-16 versus the MIG-29, they would engage with very different tactics. The F-16s advantage is not its maneuverability. It would lose in a turning fight so it would come in fast, take its shot, and bug out. The MIG-29 would want to engage in close and turn and burn with the F-16.
There was encounter between a Dutch F16 and a Serbian MIG 29 during the kosovowar 1999.
The F16 won
If you're going to talk about planes then there's a few i'd like to see.
English Electric Lightning - One of the first planes with supercruise.
F22 Raptor - Believed to be the daddy of the skies.
YF23 Black Widow II - Better than the Raptor - (change my mind)
AC130 Spectre Gunship - GUNS!!!
F14 Tomcat - Dat AIM-54 tho!
B29 Superfortress - Dropped the nukes on the Japs.
www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/34762/this-lecture-by-an-f-22-test-pilot-on-the-raptors-flight-control-system-is-bonkers
MiG 21 smiling in the background
SU-37 laughing behind it
Mig35 video, heck yes I'll watch any video you make about any jet that has ever been made. Your content is amazing!!
In Peru, in 2009, the American F-16s arrived for military training. My country was chosen because it has several Mig-29s in service, the results were very encouraging for the Peruvian pilots, considering that they were facing a world air power and perhaps the best and most capable pilots.
The best trained, and those who succeed the most in international air exercises are the Israelis (1st) and the Brits (2nd) , the US (3rd). We get more training hours per pilot than anyone else. What's interesting is that the Israeli Air force is based on the RAF and the USAAF. Those who started it were WWII veterans. However, the best pilots in the RAF were the Polish pilots...
How about doing one of these on the USS Nautilus, the first nuclear-powered submarine. Should be an interesting one given all of the engineering challenges they needed to overcome.
Simon: *says "smash that dislike button" on megaprojects*
Everyone from Business blaze: *"You weren't supposed to do that"*
taking action on video is the thing that counts. It does not matter for youtube, if action is positive or negative.
I recommend anyone who’s interested in this to search “Interview with Robert Hierl on the Mig 29 Fulcrum” on here. It’s the findings of a Luftwaffe pilot who assessed MiG 29s inherited from the DDR after unification, and may answer some questions.
Would love to see one of these videos on the history of the AH-64 Apache helicopter, which I feel is up there with the A-10 and the F-14/15/16 as iconic aircraft.
3:25 My favorite Nam era fighter, the F-4 Phantom, hope to see a video on those some day, there isn't a whole lot about them on the web.
I would love to see him do a vid on the F-4 (First modern miltirole joint strike fighter), but there is a ton of info about the F-4 out there.
@@dorsk84 There is? Oh, whenever i searched for documentaries or lengthy videos in general about the Phantom, usually there wasn't a lot coming up.
I mean, wikipedia is of course an extensive source for info, but i thought that there was kind of a void of Phantoms in videos.
Mig-29: Haha I win!
F-16: shut up.
F-15: Am I a joke to you?
no US crews......
Su35: better than all three and cheaper, just don't call the raptor on me.
@@KenNakajima07 f15ex
@@QwertyQwerty-tp1pd Yes!!!! now that is an awesome pick!
The Ghost of Kiev brought me here.
The "cobra maneuver" is not (apparently) limited to the MiG-29; Lt. Pete "Maverick" Mitchell executed the maneuver successfully in a F-14 "Tomcat" against a MiG-28 in 1986.
Mig 28?
Every video clip of the “cobra” maneuver is an SU 27 or SU 35... the MiG 29 can perform it.. but it’s far less visually striking.
The swedish, now retired, aircraft J35 Draken could perform a cobra like maneuver as well :) th-cam.com/video/jqiDEcfSnXs/w-d-xo.html check around 1:55 to 2:10.
@@climbingsnufkin actually Draken and MiG-21 can perform cobra and bell like su-27/35 and MiG-29/35 so you are bot wrong and correct at the same time
A MIG-29 cannot perform a cobra, it's close but it can't do it. A cobra requires an AOA exceeding 90° the MIG-29 is just short of that.
The SU-27 can do a whopping 120° of AOA
Although its only for show.
@@duck_that_quacks mig 29 ovt version can performe cobra
Yes lets see a *MiG-35* video please.
Simon, would you be interested in doing a video based off the mega project of super maneuverability off of avionics over airframe design? The design philosophies of East versus West are diametrically opposed but fascinating when you consider them as extreme mega projects as a whole!
I know I am a little late to this party but as far as American MiG-29, Jared Isaacman has a MiG-29UB that is used to train civilian astronauts. They used it for Inspiration4 and currently on the Polaris Dawn program.
Wow, those jet engines sure do put out a lot of TORQUE don't they. :P
Kind of brand new 😂
:D true
very good delivery!