National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. Summary | quimbee.com

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ส.ค. 2024
  • A video case brief of National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 (1937). Read the full-text brief at www.quimbee.co...
    In 1935, Congress passed the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) which created the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) (defendant) to enforce federal fair labor practice standards, including the right of employees to unionize. After Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (JLSC) (plaintiff) fired ten employees that attempted to unionize at one of its Pennsylvania plants, the NLRB sanctioned the company for engaging in discriminatory employment practices in violation of federal standards. JLSC brought suit alleging that the NLRA was an unconstitutional exercise of Congress’s interstate commerce power, and the lower courts agreed. The NLRB appealed to the Supreme Court.

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @greysongoebel3718
    @greysongoebel3718 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You are a king/queen for posting this! My lord.

  • @TheCarioka2010
    @TheCarioka2010 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    AWESOME VIDEO!! THANK YOU!!

  • @gavintoohey6604
    @gavintoohey6604 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you dear friend :)

  • @Shark_Studios2
    @Shark_Studios2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you, amazing video!

  • @moonman239
    @moonman239 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don't get the reasoning...people who strike could affect interstate commerce, therefore Congress can establish a board that forces employers to do stuff?

    • @UnitedStatesExplained
      @UnitedStatesExplained 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i agree, this seems like a clear congressional overstep

  • @NicholasWongCQ
    @NicholasWongCQ ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a terrible decision.

  • @anabruges1730
    @anabruges1730 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't understand how this video is available here but not on the web page even though I have the bronze account. How does that even make sense? Fix your issues.